EU Water Framework Directive

Similar documents
Passive sampling. - A policy perspective - Gerrit Niebeek

Joint Research Centre

THE EU-LIST OF PRIORITY SUBSTANCES A NEW STRATEGY AGAINST WATER POLLUTION

Chemical Monitoring under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) - Current Challenges

URBAN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT. Passive Sampling a tool for Screening and Monitoring of New and Emerging Compounds

L 348/84 Official Journal of the European Union DIRECTIVES

Comments of CEDA, EuDA, ESPO and PIANC on the Technical Proposal for the review of the hazardous properties of waste

Official Journal of the European Communities. (Acts whose publication is obligatory)

Branislav Vrana. Monitoring of persistent organic compounds in European surface waters: current situation and perspectives

Drinking water protected areas and pesticides. Claire Bell WRc pesticide forum 3 rd November 2015

The Status of official standard

The Water Framework Directive and its Relevance to Plant Protection Products. Mark Crane

Licence Application FORM C

UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive

Application of LC-MS for monitoring of substances in surface water under WFD

Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants from Urban Areas - Source Characterisation

UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive

Introduction to Pesticides: general environmental problems, regulations in US and Europe, toxic effects and environmental levels. Y.

RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLANNING

EU Water Framework Directive

Passive Samplers for Monitoring of Pesticides in Water

Project 6D - Manufacture of pesticides and other agrochemical products

Overview and assessment of priority substances globally and regionally addressed and related Emission Limit Value (ELVs)

Jørgen Larsen. The Waterframework Directive how it affects Biocides

Republic of Turkey Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs DG Water Management Department of Water Quality

Qualitycheck Proficiency Testing Schemes Independent external evaluation of the analytical competence of testing laboratories. Application Form

The Water Framework Directive: a challenge for analytical chemistry

Importance of chemical legislation to water quality in agriculture

Key challenges in water protection Markus Salomon, Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen

Management of Emerging Pollutants in the Marine Environment from the Perspective of a National Monitoring Authority

Common document of CEN/TC 230 and DG ENV Activity CMA-3 Support to Standardisation

Current Analytical Challenges in Water Policy. Philippe QUEVAUVILLER Joint NORMA-EAQCWISE-CMA Workshop, Paris 21 October 2008

HELCOM: environmental protection focal point in the Baltic Sea Area

EEAs assessments of the status of Europe s waters EEA visit South Baltic Water District, Sweden 16. March 2018

OSPAR MSFD Advice Document on Contaminants

Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC)

Pollutants in WWTP-Effluents of Austria

UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive

International Conventions. Regional Training in Hazardous Waste September 30 October 2, 2014 San José, Costa Rica

Official Journal of the European Union

#15: Chemicals: Scientific Models #15: Chemicals: Scientific Models ESD.936 Noelle Selin

Strategy for micro-pollutants. - Strategy for municipal. and industrial wastewater -

Strategy for Response to New POPs in Japan

CLEAN WATER Clean Water PT Scheme Schedule Clean Water PT Scheme Schedule. Schedule subject to change see ERA s website at

WHAT IS A PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANT (POP)?

Assessment of the Ecological Status and Classification of Surface Water Bodies

UK Technical Advisory Group on the Water Framework Directive

Laboratory challenges in meeting the required priority substances EQS levels

An Introduction to the EU legislation on water. Title

Hazardous substances segment of the HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan

Biomonitoring in the Water Framework Directive

Analytical Test Results: (All values are reported in mg/l unless otherwise noted)

GC-MS (Multi-Residue) Screening for Pesticides; Emerging Organic Pollutants (EOP's) and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP's).

Analytical Test Results: (All values are reported in mg/l unless otherwise noted)

Analytical Test Results: (All values are reported in mg/l unless otherwise noted)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Supporting Information for Matthies et al

Dr Dimitra VOUTSA, Assistant Professor

COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (2000/60/EC)

Introduction to Persistent organic pollutants: general environmental problems, regulations, toxic effects and environmental levels

Source control of priority substances in Europe EU-project within the sixth framework program

Evaluation of Quality Standards (EQS) and Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNEC)

Contamination by Hazardous Substances

Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality FOURTH EDITION

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Monitoring inland surface waters and transitional waters under the WFD and classifying status

National Implementation Plan for the Stockholm Convention Sweden

The analysis of natural and synthetic estrogens at sub ppt levels in surface water, crude influent and final effluent waters

Pan-European information needs on quality of freshwater

The Nine New POPs. Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)

1. GENERAL INFORMATION

Combined evaluation of EPRTR and UWWTD reporting

Phthalates : Environmental Health Issues & Reduction Strategies. Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ ACWA Water Quality Committee April 7, 2016

Chemical summary tables

Automated Solid-Phase Extraction of Organochlorine Pesticides from Drinking Water. Pranathi R Perati Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, USA

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Ontario Soil Standards (other than sediment) II (mg/kg) Potable Ground Water Non-Potable Ground Water. Industrial/ Commercial

RECOMMENDATIONS TO ECE GOVERNMENTS ON THE PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION FROM HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES

Risk Assessment Report on 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8,- hexamethylcyclopenta-γ-2-benzopyran (HHCB) Environmental Part

BIOTA MONITORING ASPECTS

Skretting Australia. Residue Monitoring. Summary of Results Issued April 2014

BIFENOX. Molecular weight (g.mol -1 ) Major metabolites observed in the environment Soil:

Introduction to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (SC) Prof. Dr. Ivan Holoubek

Analysis of Drinking Waters for a Suite of Pesticides using GC with dual ECD (US EPA Method 508.1) after SPE Concentration

EMODnet Thematic Lot n 4 - Chemistry Proposal for generating dedicated maps on contaminants

COBB COUNTY WATER SYSTEM Office of Environmental Compliance 680 South Cobb Dr., Marietta, GA or

Automated Solid-Phase Extraction of Organochlorine Pesticides from Drinking Water

FILED 12/13/ :20 AM ARCHIVES DIVISION SECRETARY OF STATE

EA WATER QUALITY PESTICIDES IN THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

Spoil and Water. Irish Ports Association Conference Ciaran Callan Dublin Port Company. 26 th September 2008

Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants

USEPA s National Fish and Wildlife Contamination Program

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER TECHNICAL BACKGROUND. Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

The occurrence of 12 EU priority substances in Swiss surface waters and biota a review of monitoring data

Uptake and translocation of non-ionised pollutants by plants

Risk Assessment Report on 6-acetyl-1,1,2,4,4,7- hexamethyltertraline (AHTN) Environmental Part. CAS No.: or

Special request, Advice May Review of environmental assessment criteria or equivalents

Ecotoxicology of agrochemicals. U n i v e r s i t y o f G i r o n a

NELAC PT for Accreditation Fields of Proficiency Testing with PTRLs Solid and Chemical Materials Effective January 3, 2012

Irish Water Strategy on the Control of Pesticides in Drinking Water. Mark Macaulay Water Supply Strategy Lead EPA National Drinking Water

Transcription:

EU Water Framework Directive Mario Carere National Institute of Health, Department Environment, Italy, Rome Topical Workshop Sediment Risk Assessment Helsinki, ECHA 7-8 May 2013 1

To protects and enhances all aquatic ecosystems and prevent further deterioration To promote sustainable water use based on a longterm protection of available water resources To reduce and eliminate emission and discharges of priority and priority hazardous substances WFD (key aspects) To achieve good ecological status for all waterbodies within 2015 To apply a combined approch through emission controls and setting of EQS for water, sediment and biota To achieve good chemical status for all waterbodies, included groundwaters within 2015 2

WFD-River Basin districts 3

4

Phytoplancton Biological Quality Elements Rivers-Water Framework Directive Macrophytes and Phytobenthos Benthic Invertebrate Fauna Fish Fauna 5

Ecological Status in Rivers-Water Framework Directive Eleme nts High status Good Status Moderate Status Benthic Inverte brate Fauna The taxonomic composition and abundance correspond totally or nearly totally to undisturbed conditions. The ratio of disturbance sensitive taxa to insensitive taxa shows no signs of alteration from undisturbed levels. The level of diversity of invertebrate taxa shows no sign of alteration from undisturbed levels. There are slight changes in the composition and abundance of invertebrate taxa from the type-specific communities. The ratio of disturbancesensitive taxa to insensitive taxa shows slight alteration from type-specific levels. The level of diversity of invertebrate taxa shows slight signs of alteration from typespecific level. The composition and abundance of invertebrate taxa differ moderately from the typespecific communities. Major taxonomic groups of the type-specific community are absent. The ratio of disturbancesensitive taxa to insensitive taxa, the level of diversity, are substantially lower than the type-specific level and significantly lower than for good status. 6

Good Chemical Status-WFD Compliance with environmental quality standards (EQS), derived for the substances of the European List of Priority. The EQS can be defined for water column, sediment or biota. 7

European Priority Substances-Sediment/Biota Matrix Priority Substance Sedimentt Biota Priority Substance Sediment Biota Alachlor O --- Naphthalene O O Anthracene P O Nick el and its compounds O O Atrazine --- --- Nonylphenols O O Benzene --- --- Octylphenols O O Brominated diphenyl ethers P P Pentachlorobenzene P O Cadmium and compounds O O Pentachlorophenol O --- compounds C10-13 - chloroalkanes P P Polyaromatic Hydrocar bons P O d Chlorfenvinphos O --- Simazine --- --- Chlorpyrifos (- ethyl, - methyl) O --- Tributyltin compounds P e P 1,2 - Dichloroethane --- --- Trichlorobenzenes --- --- Dichloromethane --- --- Trichloromethane --- --- Di(2 - ethylhexyl)phthalate O O Trifluralin O --- Diuron --- --- DDT (including DDE, DDD) P P Endosulfan O --- Aldrin O O Fluoranthene P O Endrin O O Hexachlorobenzene P P Isodrin O O Hexachlorobutadiene O O Dieldrin O O Hexachlorocyclohexane b O P Tetrachloroethylene --- --- Isoproturon O --- Tetrachloromethane --- --- Lead and its compounds O O Trichloroethylene --- --- Mercury and its compounds O P P = preferred matrix, O = optional matrix 8

EQS (environmental quality standard)- WFD definition The concentration of a particular pollutant or group of pollutants in water, sediment or biota which should not be exceeded in order to protect human health and the environment. 9

Protection Objectives Pelagic community (inland waters) Methodology for derivation of specific quality standard Acute and chronic bioassay Use of assessment factors (annex V Directive 2000/60/EC) Pelagic community ( marine waters) Benthic community (inland waters) Benthic Community (marine waters) Acute and chronic bioassays Use of assessment factors/ TGD Equilibrium partitioning method-toxicity data benthos Equilibrium partitioning mehod toxicity data benthos Top predators (marine mammals) Toxicity data-birds diet-use of BCF e BMF Human Health (consumption of fish products) Tolerable daily intake- Use of BCF Human Health (consumption of drinking water) European Directive 75/440/CE Drinking water directive 98/83/CE 10 Removal Efficiency

DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on environmental quality standards in the field of water policy 2008/105/EC Article 16 Water Framework Directive 11

Key components EQS Directive EQS for water phase for 33 priority substances EQS for 8 list I substances of dangerous substances directive (DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin..) EQS Biota for hexachlorobenzene, mercury and hexachloroutadiene. Establishment of an inventory of emission, releases and losses of priority substances. Use of Background and bioavailability for the metals 12

Environmental Quality Standards EQS: Annual average (Based mainly on Chronic bioassays) EQS: Maximum allowable concentration (Based mainly on acute bioassays) Difference between inland waters (rivers, lakes) and other waters (transitional, coastal and territorial). Specific dispositions for Metals 13

Role of Sediments Possibility for the Member States to derive EQS for the sediment compartment for the substances of the list of priority for specific waterbodies. Obligation of trend analysis in relation to the nodeterioration objective of the water framework directive. 14

Commission adoption New Priority Substances 31 January 2012: The Commission adopted a report on its review of the list of priority substances, and a proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and the Council amending Directives 2000/60/EC* and 2008/105/EC** as regards priority substances in the field of water policy. Discussion in place (EU Commission, EU Parliament and EU Council).

New Possible Priority Substances Substance BCF Log Kow Major Uses Methyl 5-(2,4- dichlorophenoxy)-2- nitrobenzoate (Bifenox) 1500 3.64 It is used as a control of weeds in post-emergence applications in winter cereals Terbutryn 181 3,48-3.77 Selective herbicide, triazine compound Cybutryne (Irgarol ) 160-30000 2,8-3,95 Effective herbicidal biocide mainly used as an antifouling agent in paints for boats and vessels. It is applied at marine as well as at inland freshwater sites Cypermethrin 1204 6.6 Insecticide Dichlorvos 1,2 1.9 organophosphorous insecticide

New Possible Priority Substances Substance BCF Log Kow Major Uses Heptachlor/Heptachlor epoxide 56000 5.40-6.10 Organochlorine insecticide-banned Dioxins PCDD+PCDF+PCB DL 30000-50000 6.1-8.20 PCDDs and PCDFs are unintentionally formed and released from thermal processes as a result of incomplete combustion or chemical reactions. Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and its salts (PFOS) 2796 5.16 (KOC) Providing grease, oil and water resistance to materials such as textiles, carpets, paper and in general coatings

New possible Priority Substances Substance BCF Log Kow Major Uses Hexabromo- cyclododecane (HBCDD) 18100 5.07-5.62 Used as a flame retardant Quinoxyfen 5040 4.66 Fungicide Dicofol 8050-13500 6 Organochlorinated acaricide

New Possible Priority Substances Substance BCF Log Kow Major Uses Aclonifen 2896 4.37 Diclofenac 69-2732 3,28-4.02 herbicidal active substance belonging to the chemical class of diphenylether pharmaceutical ingredient used by patients for the treatment of inflammation and pain 17alphaethinylestradiol 610 3.67-4.2 synthetic steroid Beta-Estradiol - 4.01 Estrogenic hormone

Water Directors conclusions

21

22

23

24

. 25

WFD Article 8 Monitoring Objective= establishing a coherent and comprehensive overview of water status within each river basin district concerns surface waters (rivers, lakes, transitional and coastal waters), ground waters and protected areas Surveillance (every management plan) Operational (status assessment for waterbodies at risk). Investigative (accidents, unknown deterioration causes) - Data 2000-2008 - Surface water - 26 Member States + CH and NO - 19 613 stations - 5 water body types - 545 387 sampling - 14 567 816 analysis 26

Sediment Monitoring-Member States 2008 912 821 analysis Fraction <50um 0,20% Fraction <63um 1,03% Fraction <20um 13,72% Fraction <2mm (whole) 85,04%

Guidance on sediment/biota monitoring Quality Assurance/Quality Control Sampling Strategy (e.g. frequency, selection of sampling stations) Technical Aspects of sediment sampling Analytical methods (metals and organic) Normalisation Passive Sampling Techniques Sediment Ecotoxicity test for the evaluation of investigative monitoring and ecological status 28

Future perspective European Report on Effect-Based Tools (biomarker, bioassays in vitro/in-vivo, EDA, Spear, OMICs) in the context of WFD Use as early warning systems (e.g. biomarkers) Selection of monitoring points, e.g. grouping of water bodies for operational Selection of quality elements based on ecological relevance. Use for investigative monitoring to identify the reason for any failure to achieve environmental objectives, in circumstances where the reason is unknown.. Detection of mixture of pollutants 29

Publications and links of Interest http://circabc.europa.eu (documents water framework directive). http://water.europa.eu/ (wise-water information system for europe). http://ec.europa.eu/enviro nment/water/index_en.ht m (website of DG Environment) 30

Thank You mario.carere@iss.it www.iss.it orbetello lagoon-tuscany/central italy 31