DISASTER LOGISTICS: HOW TO ESTIMATE THE EMERGENCY GOODS TO SUPPORT EARTHQUAKE RELIEF OPERATIONS

Similar documents
A PROCEDURE FOR ESTABLISHING FRAGILITY FUNCTIONS FOR SEISMIC LOSS ESTIMATE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS BASED ON NONLINEAR PUSHOVER ANALYSIS

Potential benefits of strengthening earthquake-prone buildings

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE AND RISK EXPERIENCE AND MODELLING IN NEW ZEALAND

DEMONSTRATION PROJECT OF EARTHQUAKE HAZARD FOR CHIA-I CITY OF TAIWAN

RECENT DEVELOPMENT IN EARTHQUAKE RISK MANAGEMENT PLANS AND PROGRAMS IN TEHRAN

The Study on Seismic Microzoning of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of IRAN

Earthquake Damage Assessment System for New Taipei City

Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Turkey Part II: Inclusion of Site Characteristics

STRATEGIC APPROACH TO MITIGATE HUMAN CASUALTIES CAUSED BY LARGE SCALE EARTHQUAKES <Engineering for Safer Non-engineered Houses>

Available at: Last Modified: December 2012

SEISMIC DAMAGE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT MAPS OF THE CITY OF GACHSARAN

Table 1. Study region population, households and building exposure by county

DEVELOPMENT OF HAZTURK AND APPLICATION IN ISTANBUL

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI SIMULATION OUTPUT FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT

Probabilistic earthquake risk assessment of Newcastle and Lake Macquarie, Australia: Part 2 Earthquake vulnerability and risk

JCI Activity on ISO Standard for Seismic Evaluation of Concrete Structures. Masaomi Teshigawara 1

Key Message and Lessons on Buildings

REDUCING EARTHQUAKE VULNERABILITY OF NON-ENGINEERED BUILDINGS: CASE STUDY OF RETROFITTING OF SCHOOL BUILDING IN INDONESIA


Hazus-MH: Earthquake Event Report

NZSEE CONFERENCE Jack Moehle University of California, Berkeley

Seismic Loss Estimation and Reduction after Structural Rehabilitation in Chiang Rai City

CASE STUDY: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CONFINED MASONRY HOMES IN INDONESIA. 16 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Santiago, Chile

SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM OF BUCHAREST

Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofitting of School Buildings in Indonesia

LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE 2007 PISCO EARTHQUAKE (PERU) AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DISASTER MITIGATION

Lecture 2: Commercial vs. Humanitarian Supply Chains

HAZUS-MH: Earthquake Event Report

HAZUS-MH: Earthquake Event Report

A Summary Report on Muzaffarabad Earthquake, Pakistan

Report on Retrofit Procedure of School Buildings in Islamic Republic of Iran

PACES: Preparedness for Appropriate accommodation in Emergency Shelters

DERIVATION OF HYBRID VULNERABILITY FUNCTIONS BASED ON OBSERVATIONAL DATA FOR IRAN

Damage to Building Structures Caused by the 1999 Chi-chi Earthquake in Taiwan

Chapter 1. 1 Introduction. 1.1 General Scope. Chapter 1

Earthquake Risk Assessment using PSHA in ArcGIS for developing countries - An easy and quick approach

SEISMIC RESPONSE EVALUATION AND RETROFIT OF A FIVE-STORIED RC BUILDING DAMAGED DUE TO THE 2017 TRIPURA EARTHQUAKE

Loss Modeling & Risk Assessment (Tasks 5 & 6) Donald Ballantyne, MMI Engineering Hope Seligson, MMI Engineering

[Bindu, 5(1): January, 2016] ISSN: (I2OR), Publication Impact Factor: 3.785

Sustainable evaluation of urban buildings for safety in environment management: the case of the Taiwan 921 earthquake

Initiative for Disaster Reduction through ODA

GLOBAL SEISMIC RISK REDUCTION PROGRAMS: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION IN ISTANBUL

Past, Present And Future: What Works In Achieving Safer Buildings

The importance of Disaster Risk Reduction

MALTA S RISK MINIMISATION TO EARTHQUAKE, VOLCANIC, TSUNAMI DAMAGE

FINAL REPORT JOINT RESEARCH (KERJASAMA PENELITIAN ) PT. INDOCEMENT TUNGGAL PRAKARSA Tbk.

Humanitarian Aid and Disaster Relief Operations: Logistics Perspective

Shaking Table Test of Two-Story Masonry House Model Retrofitted by PP-band Mesh

Building Safe School Programs. Seismic Zones and Codes Change 1976 (10% PE in 50 yrs) 6 Regions on 2008 USGS hazard map 4/6/2012

ResQ: An Earthquake Risk Prioritisation Tool

EARTHQUAKE PROTECTION IN EUROPE:

+ Soil Maps + Building Inventory Maps

Earthquake-prone, Dangerous and Insanitary Buildings Policy 2011

4. BUILDINGS, DWELLINGS AND BRIDGE

EARTHQUAKE LOSS ESTIMATION AND RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY FROM CONCEPT TO REAL APPLICATIONS YASIN M. FAHJAN

SEISMIC HUMAN LOSS ESTIMATION IN TEHRAN USING GIS

Retrofitting of 8-Storey Bumi Minang Hotel Building (Numerical Simulation)

Seismic fragility assessment of model buildings in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

The Northridge Earthquake Impacts, Recovery and Lessons from Catastrophic Planning

SEISMIC REHAB OF RC STRUCTURES

1- A brief introduction to Bam and the earthquake. 2- Reconstruction policies

Seismic Performance of Multistorey Building with Soft Storey at Different Level with RC Shear Wall

Shaking table test on seismic response behavior of 2-story masonry house model with PP-band mesh retrofitting

Seismic vulnerability assessment using satellite data

Background Paper on the Conversion of Damage Probability Matrices into Fragility Curves

BEHAVIOR OF RC STRUCTURES UNDER TSUNAMI TRIGGERED BY THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE

Humanitarian Disasters are Common and Important. Humanitarian Logistics. Humanitarian Disasters are Common and Important

LAURIE JOHNSON CONSULTING Progress Report: CCSF Lifelines Council Interdependency Study

Economics on Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Low-rise Building in Korea

New Strategy for Earthquake Risk Management - How to motivate people for safety-

RECONSTRUCTION PRACTICES IN ACEH AFTER 2004 TSUNAIMI DISASTER

MEXICO CITY RECOVERY UPDATE: SEVEN MONTHS AFTER THE M7.1 CENTRAL MEXICO EARTHQUAKE

"Impact of New IS 1893 & Related Codes on Design of tall Buildings, Including Trend Setting Structures

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Opening on Confined Masonry Wall under Cyclic Lateral Loading

KASHMIR EARTHQUAKE OF OCTOBER 8, 2005: FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND STUDY OF CURRENT SEISMIC PROVISIONS FOR BUILDINGS IN PAKISTAN

Earthquake Risk Assessment Using HAZUS. Muhammad Murad Billah Senior GIS Coordinator

Experimental Study on Wall-Frame Connection of Confined Masonry Wall

Proposed Damage Function for Existing RC Residential Buildings in Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan

EFFECTS OF SOFT FIRST STORY ON SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BUILDINGS AND SUSTAINABLE APPROACH TO RETROFIT

RADIUS PROJECT IN TASHKENT, UZBEKISTAN

Reconnaissance Report on the China Wenchuan Earthquake May 12, 2008

THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING IN THE URBAN RESILIENCE TO THE HAZARDS OF EARTHQUAKES AND FLOODS: THE CASE OF MOROCCO

THE FRENCH WEST INDIES EARTHQUAKE PLAN

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE RESULT OF SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF TOKYO, JAPAN

HOW PERUVIAN SEISMIC CODE GREATLY IMPROVED BUILDING RESPONSE TO REAL EARTHQUAKES. Javier PIQUE 1, Peter MARTEL 2 SUMMARY INTRODUCTION

Performance of Batten Columns in Steel Buildings During the Bam Earthquake of 26 December 2003

CDM-ITB Contributions to Disaster Mitigation in Indonesia

Strengthening of Single Bay Tunnel Form Building using Steel Angle, Steel Plate and CFRP Under Out-of-Plane Cyclic Loading

EARTHQUAKE LOADS ON MULTISTOREY BUILDINGS AS PER IS: AND IS: : A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Earthquake Risk and Its Reduction Technology in Japan

APPENDIX B PROJECT PROBLEM STATEMENT AND PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT

Engineering Geology and Seismology. Structural Geology

RECONNAISSANCE OBSERVATION FROM MAY 12 CHINA EARTHQUAKE

Reassessment of Earthquake Design Philosophy in Australia after the Christchurch Earthquake

Evaluation of target seismic safety level and safety consciousness from user surveys

2011 HAZUS Scenario Study San Diego Region

THE 5 TH JORDANIAN INTERNATIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERING CONFERENCE:

Seismic Performance Evaluation of an Existing Precast Concrete Shear Wall Building

S E I S M I C RETROFITTING GUIDELINES

AN EXAMINATION OF DAMAGES OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSOLED BUILDINGS IN TURKEY DUE TO 17 AUGUST 1999 KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE

Transcription:

DISASTER LOGISTICS: HOW TO ESTIMATE THE EMERGENCY GOODS TO SUPPORT EARTHQUAKE RELIEF OPERATIONS by R. Oktarina 1,2, S. Nur Bahagia 3, L. Diawati 3, K. S. Pribadi 4, and K. Okazaki 5 1 PhD Student, Department of Industrial Engineering, 2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Widyatama University, Bandung, Indonesia 3 Department of Industrial Engineering, 4 Department of Civil Engineering, 5 Disaster Management Program, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Tokyo, Japan E-mail: rienna.oktarina@students.itb.ac.id, rienna.oktarina@widyatama.ac.id ABSTRACT Disaster logistics, or humanitarian supply chain management, has attracted research attention in recent years. This paper develops an estimation model to estimate the types and quantities of emergency goods necessary to support earthquake relief operations. It is crucial that the buffer stock for earthquake relief be well defined and ready to deliver to disaster areas when an earthquake occurs. This paper therefore serves as a guide to disaster logistics, especially how to estimate the emergency goods needed for earthquake relief operations. It not only reviews the literature to describe current practices and research trends in disaster logistics but also provides a model framework to estimate the emergency goods necessary in this regard. KEYWORDS Humanitarian Logistics, Disaster Logistics, Earthquake, Earthquake Relief, Emergency Goods, RADIUS Tool INTRODUCTION Indonesia occupies a very active tectonic zone, because it is located at the meeting point of three of the world s major tectonic plates and nine smaller plates (Bird, 2003 in Irsyam, et al., 2010). The existence of these tectonic plate interactions makes the region vulnerable to earthquakes (Milson, et al., 1992 in Irsyam, et al., 2010). Indeed, between 1897 and 2009, there occurred more than 14,000 earthquakes with a magnitude M > 5.0 (Irsyam, et al., 2010). In the past six years, various major earthquake activities have been recorded in Indonesia. These activities have included the Aceh earthquake accompanied by tsunami in 2004 with a magnitude M = 9.2, the Nias earthquake in 2005 (M = 8.7), the Yogya earthquake in 2006 (M = 6.3), the Tasikmalaya earthquake in 2009 (M = 7.4) and the West Sumatera earthquake in 2009 (M = 7.6). These earthquakes caused thousands of casualties and considerable damage to collapsed infrastructure and buildings and cost billions of rupiah in rehabilitation and reconstruction (Irsyam, et al., 2010). Based on these facts, it can be inferred that Indonesia should be prioritized for earthquake relief operations. Earthquakes are a serious disruption for society, causing widespread loss of human life in addition to material, economic and environmental losses. These losses can exceed the capabilities of local communities to resolve them using their own resources, and thus locals frequently need help from other areas, which require a well-designed earthquake relief system. The earthquake relief system relies on demand management to allow the emergency response to be carried out quickly, precisely and accurately. The pattern of demand management in emergency relief is irregular with respect to quantity, time and place. Thus, prediction models for emergency goods that support earthquake relief operations are required. Examples of emergency goods included food and drink, medicine, milk for babies and diapers. This research develops prediction models that can predict the types and quantities of emergency goods necessary to support earthquake relief operations. Buffer stock for earthquake relief must be well defined and ready to deliver to disaster areas when an earthquake occurs so that emergency response activities can be carried out immediately.

DISASTER LOGISTICS Disaster logistics (also called humanitarian logistics) is defined as the process of planning, implementing and controlling the efficient and cost-effective flow and storage of goods and materials, as well as related information, from the point of origin to the point of consumption for alleviating the suffering of vulnerable people (Thomas and Kopczak, 2005). Two major streams of disaster logistics can be distinguished, namely continuous aid work and disaster relief. According to Ertem et al. (2010), the main objective of disaster logistics is to save lives and help beneficiaries in contrast to that of commercial logistics, which is to maximize profit. Kovács and Spens (2007) further stated that humanitarian logistics could be characterized by time delays, which may result in the loss of lives. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY This research develops a model to estimate and determine the types and quantities of emergency goods needed by disaster victims during the emergency response phase of an earthquake. The mapping of the research approach is illustrated schematically in Figure. 1. FIGURE 1 RESEARCH APPROACH To this end, five main models should be considered: - Model #1: Estimation of Earthquake Risk. The outputs from this model are the estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) and estimation of Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) for the area analyzed. - Model #2: Estimation of Building Damage. The output from this model is the damage to buildings following the earthquake, i.e. number of damaged residential buildings, schools, hospitals, shopping centers and industrial facilities. - Model #3: Estimation of Death and Injury. This model consists of two models; the first one estimates injuries, while the second estimates fatalities. - Model #4: Estimation of Displaced Population. This model estimates displaced populations by category, such gender and age. Specific categories of displaced populations are needed to estimate the specific emergency goods for children, adults and the elderly. - Model #5: Estimation of Emergency Goods. This model is based on the estimations provided by Models 1 4. It determines the types and quantities of emergency goods needed by disaster victims in the emergency response phase. The approach to this research is based on the already existing RADIUS (Risk Assessment Tools for the Diagnosis of Urban Areas against Seismic Disasters) tool. According to Okazaki et al. (2000), RADIUS is an initiative of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (1990 2000), which was launched in 1996. This promotes worldwide activities for reducing seismic disasters in urban areas, particularly in developing countries. RADIUS provides a methodology and guidelines for risk assessment based on the findings of case studies in nine selected cities. In particular, it offers a spreadsheet-based program for estimating earthquake damage and casualties in an area or city with limited information. The program can thus be used to evaluate the earthquake risk situation in a city. The output of RADIUS is the estimated damage caused by an earthquake, including number of deaths and injuries, based on the prevailing conditions, such as information on demographics, relative density of buildings, soil type and inventory information related to buildings. The results of RADIUS can be used to develop a mitigation plan to prepare the city to face future earthquakes.

ESTIMATING EMERGENCY GOODS TO SUPPORT EARTHQUAKE RELIEF OPERATIONS The mapping of the models described in Section 3 can be seen schematically in Figure. 2. First, an earthquake scenario for the disaster area should be agreed. The epicenter, magnitude and occurrence time (day or night) should also be determined. Ground shaking intensity or PGA at the site usually becomes greater as the magnitude becomes larger or the distance from the site to the epicenter becomes smaller. Ground shaking is also greatly influenced by the ground conditions of the site. Thus, an earthquake hazard value can be estimated from the parameters of the earthquake scenario and ground conditions. Damage is then estimated from this hazard value and existing structures in the area (i.e., number of structures as well as types of buildings or lifeline facilities) using vulnerability functions derived for each type of structure. Vulnerability functions reflect the relationship between seismic intensity and the degree of damage to a structure. Casualties such as deaths and injuries are also estimated if the population distribution is known. Then, the total amount and distribution of damage can be estimated if the chosen earthquake scenario were to occur. Thus, the displaced population can be predicted and the emergency goods necessary to respond estimated. A seismic intensity scale is the most familiar index to indicate the strength of ground shaking and/or how an earthquake will affect an area. Several types of intensity scales exist and different types are used throughout the world. The most commonly used scale is the MMI scale, which is applied herein, although PGA is also used for the convenience of engineers since this parameter is adopted in the design and analyses of structures. In RADIUS, PGA can be calculated using one of four attenuation formulas: Joyner and Boore (1981), Campbell (1981), Fukushima and Tanaka (1990) and Young (1997). PGA is then converted into MMI using the empirical formula of Trifunac and Brady (1975). The estimations of PGA and MMI are calculated in Model 1. The RADIUS Tool also adopts four ground classifications based on the surface soil, namely "Hard Rock," "Soft Rock," "Medium Soil" and "Soft Soil." For an effective estimation of damage to buildings, a building classification is necessary. Buildings can be classified according to various parameters. RADIUS adopts a simple building classification that categorizes buildings into the following 10 types: (1) RES-Informal construction, (2) RES2-URM-RC (URM = Unreinforced Masonry, RC = Reinforced Concrete) composite construction, height up to three stories, (3) RES - URM- RC composite construction, height four to six stories, (4) RES4-Engineered RC construction, newly constructed multistory buildings, (5) EDU1-School buildings, up to two stories, (6) EDU2-School buildings, greater than two stories, (7) MED1-Low to medium rise hospitals, (8) MED2-High rise hospitals, (9) COM-Shopping Centers, and (10) IND- Industrial facilities, both low and high risk. Building damage caused by earthquakes contributes to disasters and causes casualties and fires. Earthquake damage to buildings is greatly influenced by the types of buildings. The estimation of collapsed or heavy damage to buildings, which is considered to be the main cause of death and injury during an earthquake, is calculated in Model 2. Casualties can be calculated based on the number of damaged buildings. Information on the number of people found inside buildings during the earthquake is necessary for casualty and injury calculations. The number of people inside buildings during the day and night is usually different since the ratio of building usage differs. For example, day population is smaller than night population in residential dwellings. Alternatively, school and office populations are higher during the day and almost non-existent during the night. In RADIUS, day and night populations are estimated individually for each type of building classification. Daytime is defined as from 6 am to 6 pm and nighttime from 6 pm to 6 am. The estimation of deaths and injuries during an earthquake is calculated in Model 3. The next step is to estimate the displaced population based on the population distribution by age, estimation of building damage (from Model 2), average number of household occupants and estimation of deaths and severe injuries (from Model 3). The estimation of the displaced population during an earthquake is calculated in Model 4. The outputs of this model are divided into the following age categories: 0 years old, 1 3 years old, 3 69 years old, more than 70 years old and women aged 10 55 years old. Finally, we must calculate the types and quantities of emergency goods necessary to support earthquake relief activities. This estimation should be well prepared to respond to devastating earthquakes, especially in the emergency response phase. The estimation of emergency goods is based on the displaced population output (from Model 4) as well as on standards or guidance to fulfill the basic needs for emergency goods. The estimation of emergency goods is calculated in Model 5.

FIGURE 2 FRAMEWORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ESTIMATION MODEL CONCLUSION This paper not only reviewed the literature to describe disaster logistics but also provided a model framework to estimate the emergency goods necessary to support earthquake relief operations. Further research is needed to extend the mathematical formulation or equation in order to describe how to estimate emergency goods. The mathematic formulation should be considered to be a one-shot decision estimation, because the emergency response should be carried out as quickly as possible, as there is no chance to reorder emergency goods.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was completed while I was a visiting scholar at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS). It was funded by the DGHE, Ministry of National Education Republic of Indonesia (scholarship program, Contract no. 1203/E4.4/K/2012). REFERENCES Ertem, Mustafa A., Buyurgan, Nebil., Rossetti, Manuel D., (2010): Multiple-buyer procurement auctions framework for humanitarian supply chain management, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40 (3), 202-227. Irsyam, Masyhur and Research Team. (2010), Ringkasan Hasil Studi Tim Revisi Peta Gempa Indonesia, Research Report, ITB Bandung. Kovács, Gyogyi., and Spens, Karen M., (2007): Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37 (2), 99-114. Okazaki, Kenji and RADIUS Team. (2000), RADIUS Initiative for IDNDR - How to Reduce Urban Seismic Risk, Proceedings of 12 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (12WCEE-) in New Zealand. Thomas, Anisya S.S. and Kopczak, Laura.R. (2005), From logistics to supply chain management: the path forward in the humanitarian sector, available at: http://www.fritzinstitute.org/pdfs/whitepaper/fromlogisticsto.pdf (accessed 15 January 2013).