Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 529 Department of Transportation July Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Similar documents
OHD L-52. Aggregate Proportioning Guide For Optimized Gradation Concrete Mix Designs

OHD L-52. Aggregate Proportioning Guide for Optimized Gradation Concrete Mix Designs

LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for CALIBRATION OF MECHANICAL SIEVE SHAKER

Chapter 6 Tex-204-F, Design of Bituminous Mixtures

Tex-204-F, Design of Bituminous Mixtures

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENT 1126 DEVELOPING AND SUBMITTING A PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE MIX DESIGN FOR ACCEPTANCE

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (GRADE P1M)

OPTIMIZED 3/4" GRADATION LIGHTWEIGHT AGGREGATE REPORT

SAMPLING OF AGGREGATES FOP FOR AASHTO T 2 (11)

Foreword... iii Table of Contents...v List of Figures...vii List of Tables...viii. Chapter 1 : Background...1

AGGREGATE WAQTC FOP AASHTO T 2 (11)

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 106 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 614 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

FLAT PARTICLES, ELONGATED PARTICLES, OR FLAT AND ELONGATED PARTICLES IN COARSE AGGREGATE ASTM D 4791

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 106 Department of Transportation Revised May Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION

ENGINEERING MATERIALS Assignment #8: Concrete Mix Design

3- Highway Materials Aggregates

Standard Test Procedures Manual

Stabilization Assessment of Aggregates in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures I. Akiije, G. L. Oyekan

Asphalt Concrete Properties

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 606 Department of Transportation March 2016 Page 1. Laboratory Testing Section. Method of Test for

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

PCC Pavement Mix Proportioning and Strength

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE GRADE P1, MODIFIED

LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for AIR CONTENT OF HARDENED CONCRETE

Modified Concrete Mixes and Optimized Aggregate Gradations. Ethan Bahmer MDOT s Statewide Concrete Construction Engineer

2.5. ASTM D 4791; Standard Test Method for Flat Particles, Elongated Particles, or Flat and Elongated Particles in Coarse Aggregate

3. Brush adhering grains from the outside of the measure and determine the mass of the cylinder and contents to the nearest 0.1g.

INVESTIGATION OF THE DESIGN OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES USING MINNESOTA TACONITE ROCK

Superpave Volumetric Mix Design

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 507 Department of Transportation October Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

METHOD OF TEST FOR CEMENT CONTENT FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS

DESIGN OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES

Apr 17, 2000 LAB MANUAL TRIAL MIX PREPARATION BATCHING - PROPORTIONING TRIAL MIXES - FORMULAS

Mix Design and Pumped Concrete

HMA Economics 101. Bailey Method for Achieving Volumetrics and HMA Compactability ASPHALT INSTITUTE

Superpave Mix Design

Application and properties of Fiber Reinforced Concrete

CHAPTER 5 FRESH AND HARDENED PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE WITH MANUFACTURED SAND

Concrete Materials CIVL

Asphalt Concrete Properties

Civ E 391 Midterm Exam (Soils and Asphalt Concrete)

CHAPTER 5 BLENDING AGGREGATES

Optimized Mix Design Proportioning Procedures COMPASS

MOLDING, TESTING, AND EVALUATING ASPHALT BLACK BASE MATERIALS

CE 240 Soil Mechanics & Foundations Lecture 3.3. Soil Compaction (Das, Ch. 5)

Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)

To determine relevant properties of aggregates used in the making of hot mix asphalt (HMA).

Project : Implementing Strategies for Mitigating or Preventing Premature Concrete Deterioration in Texas Bridge Structures

CIVE.3100 ENGINEERING MATERIALS ASSIGNMENT #8: CONCRETE MIX PROPORTIONING

Aggregate Optimization. Quality Assurance Workshop February Justin Bryan. Frank Bryan Inc. Bryan Materials Group

SECTION 706 AGGREGATES FOR PORTLAND CEMENT PRODUCTS SCOPE

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR AGGREGATES - MISCELLANEOUS

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SUPERPAVE HMA MIXTURES. C&T:CJB 1 of 5 C&T:APPR:SJP:DBP: FHWA:APPR:

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR AGGREGATES - GENERAL

CHAPTER 3 MATERIAL PROPERTIES AND MIX DESIGN

OPTIMIZED GRADATION FOR CONCRETE PAVING MIXTURES BEST PRACTICES WORKSHOP

SECTION 329 PLANT MIXED SEAL COAT CONSTRUCTION

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR AGGREGATES - MISCELLANEOUS

Workshop Introduction

Aggregate Proportioning and Gradation for Slip Formed Pavements. Daniel Cook, Nick Seader, Ashkan Ghaeezadeh, Bruce Russell Tyler Ley, P.E., Ph.D.

LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for DETERMINATION OF ASPHALT CONTENT AND GRADATION OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURES BY THE IGNITION METHOD

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, 2015 EDITION

DR P.SRAVANA 2 Professor, Dept of Civil Engineering, JNTU College of Engineering, Hyderabad, A.P-INDIA,

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 2 SIEVE ANALYSIS AND FINENESS MODULUS

CCIL BC/MB/NB/NL/SK Aggregate and Soil Proficiency Sample Program Please read the following instructions carefully BEFORE you start testing!

INTRODUCTION TO ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR MANAGERS AND OWNERS ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION OF OREGON

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR IN-PLACE FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND UNDERLYING GRANULAR

Potential Use and Applications for Reclaimed Millings

Geotechnics, Inc. East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR AGGREGATES - CONCRETE

Spectrum of Axles Approach

Effect of Aggregate Size and Gradation on Compressive Strength of Normal Strength Concrete for Rigid Pavement

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION 3048 Permeable Concrete

City of Brandon Division 2 Standard Construction Specifications Section January 2009 (Revision 3) Page 1 of 6 READY MIXED CONCRETE

-vs- Figure 4.1. Comparison of the residual asphalt content of different binders.

HANDS-ON TRAINING: MATERIALS AND MIX DESIGN

Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method

Tex-205-F, Laboratory Method of Mixing Bituminous Mixtures

Mix Design For Concrete Roads As Per IRC:

STUDIES ON MARSHALL AND MODIFIED MARSHALL SPECIMENS BY USING CRMB

Improving Hot Mix Asphalt Performance with SUPERPAVE

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR IN-PLACE FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND UNDERLYING GRANULAR

Why the Box Test & Super Air Meter are Important to Your QA Program

Seattle Public Utilities Materials Laboratory

Civil Engineering Materials SAB 2112

CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR IN-PLACE FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND UNDERLYING GRANULAR

CHAPTER-3 MIX DESIGN AND STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF GPC

Chapter 32 Tex-236-F, Determining Asphalt Content from Asphalt Paving Mixtures by the Ignition Method

Scope. Overview. Apparatus. FOP for AASHTO T 255. FOP for AASHTO T 265. Total Evaporable Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying

High RAP Asphalt Mixes and Asphalt Mixes with Shingles

MATERIAL SPECIFICATION FOR AGGREGATES - MISCELLANEOUS

Engineering Technical Letter (ETL) 97-5 (Change 1): Proportioning Concrete Mixtures with Graded Aggregates for Rigid Airfield Pavements

STRATA Certified Laboratory Tests

Sampling of Aggregates. for. Use as Highway Materials. Overview. Importance and Types of Sampling. Segregation, Degradation, Contamination

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 130 Department of Transportation January Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION. Method of Test for

2.3. KT-3; Material Passing No. 200 (75µm) Sieve by the Wash Method

Highway Engineering Materials - CE 400 Spring 2009 Aggregate Labs Draft Due February 4, 2009 Final Report Due February 11, 2009

Aggregate Specifications

Transcription:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania PA Test Method No. 529 Department of Transportation 6 Pages LABORATORY TESTING SECTION Method of Test for DETERMINING THE OPTIMIZED AGGREGATE GRADATION FOR HYDRAULIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT MIX DESIGNS 1. SCOPE 1.1 This method describes a procedure for analyzing combined aggregate gradations for use in optimized concrete pavement mix designs. 2. OUTLINE OF METHOD 2.1 The development of an optimized concrete mix gradation entails calculation of the combined gradation of aggregates to be included in a concrete pavement mix and identification of the percent of cumulative material retained on all required sieves on the percent retained chart to determine the desired characteristics of the combined aggregate structure. The basis of trial mix design components is one cubic yard. 3. APPARATUS 3.1 The apparatus used for sampling aggregates and performing sieve analysis will be as provided in PTM 607 and PTM 616. 4. PROCEDURE 4.1 Sieve Analysis 4.1.1 Submit a sieve analysis report for the proposed aggregate showing the cumulative combined percent, the cumulative combined percent retained, and the combined percent retained as shown in Table 1, Example Sieve Analysis. Include all standard sieve sizes in the sieve analysis report beginning with the maximum nominal aggregate size of the proposed aggregate and proceeding in decreasing particle size to include the No. 200 sieve. 4.1.2 Perform sieve analysis in accordance with PTM 616 for each aggregate to be used in the mix. Complete the Sieve Analysis Report for the blended aggregates by calculating the cumulative combined percent, the cumulative combined percent retained, and the combined percent retained. Use the sieve analysis percent results of each aggregate gradation, the percentage of each aggregate for the concrete mix, and the following equations for the calculations. 4.1.3 Determine the percent of each aggregate used in the mix design combined aggregate gradation.

Page 2 4.1.4 Calculate the cumulative combined percent each sieve using the following equation: Where: CCCC = {(PPPP)(BBBB)} Cp = Cumulative Combined Passing Px = the Passing of each Aggregate Bx = the of the Total Aggregate Gradation 4.1.5 Calculate the cumulative combined percent retained on each sieve using the following equation: Cr = 100 - Cp Where: Cr = Cumulative Combined Retained Cp = Cumulative Combined Passing equation: 4.1.6 Calculate the combined percent retained for each sieve using the following Where: C = Cr Crx 4.2 Gradation Analysis C = Combined Retained for each sieve Cr = Cumulative Combined Retained Crx = Cumulative Combined Retained of the next larger sieve size 4.2.1 Submit a combined gradation percent retained chart for the proposed aggregates as shown in Figure 1, Combined Gradation Percent Retained Chart. 4.2.2 Calculate the total volume of the coarse portion of the fine aggregate by adding the Combined Retained (C) on each sieve from the No. 8 sieve to the No. 30 sieve inclusive. Total Volume of Coarse Portion = C No. 8 + C No. 16 + C No. 30

Page 3 The total volume of coarse portion of the fine aggregate must be a minimum of 15 percent; therefore, if the Total Volume of Course 15, then the aggregate combination is acceptable. 4.2.3 Calculate the total volume of the fine portion of the fine aggregate using the Combined Retained (C) on all the sieves from the No. 30 sieve to the No. 200 sieve inclusive. Total Volume of Fine Portion= C No. 30 + C No. 50 + C No. 100 + C No. 200 The total volume of fine portion of the fine aggregate must be from 24 percent to 34 percent; therefore, if 24 Total Volume of Fine Portion 34, then the aggregate combination is acceptable. 5. EXAMPLE 5.1 An example table with sample calculations for this test method. Table 1 Sieve Analysis Example Report Coarse Aggregate Fine Aggregate Cumulative Combined Combined (per sieve) #1 #2 #3 #1 #2 retained retained Sieve sizes P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 Cp Cr C 2 1/2 2.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2 2 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1 1/2 1.5 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.75 99.0 100.0 100.0 99.6 0.4 0.4 3/4 0.75 92.0 100.0 100.0 96.5 3.5 3.1 1/2 0.5 50.0 100.0 100.0 78.0 22.0 18.5 3/8 0.375 12.0 98.0 100.0 61.0 39.0 17.0 No. 4 0.187 2.0 20.0 97.0 42.9 57.1 18.1 No. 8 0.093 1.0 3.0 80.0 32.9 67.1 10.0 No. 16 0.047 0.0 2.0 68.0 27.5 72.5 5.4 No. 30 0.024 0.0 0.0 40.0 16.0 84.0 11.5 No. 50 0.012 0.0 0.0 25.0 10.0 90.0 6.0 No. 100 0.006 0.0 0.0 5.0 2.0 98.0 8.0 No. 200 0.003 0.80 0.80 2.20 1.4 98.6 2.0* of Total Blended Aggregate (Bx) 44.0 16.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 *The No. 200 sieve includes what remains on the Pan

Page 4 5.2 To provide assistance in complete the sieve analysis report, example calculations for the No. 8 sieve are shown for the cumulative combined percent, the cumulative combined percent retained, and the combined percent retained. Cumulative Combined Passing Cp = (P1 x B1) + (P2 x B2) + (P3 x B3) Cp = (1 x 44) + (3 x 16) + (80 x 40) Cp = 0.44 + 0.48 + 32.0 Cp = 32.9 Cumulative Combined Retained Cr = 100 - Cp Cr = 100-32.9 Cr = 67.1 Combined Retained C = Cr - Crx C = 67.1 57.1 C = 10.0 5.3 Example calculations to determine the total volume of the course portion and total volume of the fine portion using the calculated combined percent retained in Table 1, Sieve Analysis Example. Total Volume of Coarse Portion = C No. 8 + C No. 16 + C No. 30 Total Volume of Coarse Portion = 10 + 5.4 + 11.5 Total Volume of Course Portion = 26.95 26.95 > 15, the aggregate combination is acceptable Total Volume of Fine Portion= C No. 30 + C No. 50 + C No. 100 + C No. 200 Total Volume of Fine Portion = 11.5 + 6 + 8 + 2.0 Total Volume of Fine Portion = 27.5 24 < 27.5 < 34 the aggregate combination is acceptable

Page 5 6. EVALUATE COMBINED AGGREGATE GRADATIONS 6.1 Combined Gradation Percent Retained Chart Create the combined gradation percent retained chart for the combined aggregate mix by plotting the combined (per sieve) percent retained on the vertical axis vs. the sieve sizes on the horizontal axis, as shown in Figure 1. The combined percent retained aggregate must be within the limits outlined in Table 2 below. Table 2 Combined Percent Retained Limits Sieve Size Lower Limit Upper Limit 1 ½" 0 0 1" 0 16 ¾" 0 20 ½" 4 20 3/8" 4 20 No. 4 4 20 No. 8 0 12 No. 16 0 12 No. 30 4 20 No. 50 4 20 No. 100 0 10 No. 200 0 2 6.2 Selection of Optimized Aggregate Gradation Develop trial mix designs based on the aggregate gradations and percentages of the combined percent retained plot previously discussed. Select materials that plot within the limits of the chart. Develop trial batches from gradations meeting the limits of the chart, required fine aggregate volumes, and flat and elongated limits to determine which proportions meet the strength requirements of the project.

Page 6 Combined Gradation Percent Retained Chart 25 Lower Upper Retained 20 Percent Retained 15 10 5 0 2" 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" # 4 # 8 # 16 # 30 # 50 # 100 # 200 Sieve Size Figure 1 Combined Percent Retained Chart