REINFORCING TABLES INSTALLATION MANUAL

Similar documents
Lintel Tables Design Notes and Limitations

HOW BIG IS AFRICA? Rules. recommended grades: 3-6

Benchmarking Standards, Model Codes, Codes and Voluntary Guidelines on the HERS Index

Product Information Bulletin

Watershed Condition Framework

Accelerating Energy Efficiency in Texas

ENERGY STAR Oil Furnaces Product List

Arxx High Performance Wallsystems

128 Million Reasons to Get BPI Certified

Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code, the 2000 International Building Code and the 2000 International Residential Code

Do you have staff reviewing formation filings for name availability purposes or is this done electronically?

Asphalt Pavement Mix Production Survey On Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement, Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles, And Warm-mix Asphalt Usage:

ANNEX E: Methodology for Estimating CH 4 Emissions from Coal Mining

Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi

See the IRC for additional information. See CPD-DS Information Bulletin 100 for Requirements for 1 & 2 Family Dwelling plan submittals.

Prescriptive Engineering Helix TM Above Grade Tables

LTC Implementation of LADOTD Mass Concrete & Maturity Testing Specifications. Presented by. Mark A. Cheek, PE, FACI Vice-President

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 28, 2012

U.S. Drought Monitor, September 4, 2012

ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California

U.S. Drought Monitor, July 31, 2012

Government Spending and Air Pollution in the US

Chapter TRI Data and Trends (Original Industries Only)

Intermodal Fuel Surcharge An Intermodal Fuel Charge will be assessed per container/trailer on all inland rates 'Door' location rates.

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Case Study: market growth strategy. - Selection of slides

NEAUPG Annual Fall Meeting

CALCULATING THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) PROGRAM ACCESS INDEX: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR 2013

130 Million Reasons to Develop a Green Workforce


2012 Distribution Best Practices Benchmarking Company Profile Data Packet

PUBLISHER S AUDIENCE STATEMENT December 2017

Forest Resources of the United States, 2017:

Labor Market Outlook. Labor Market Outlook Survey Q (October December) Published by the Society for Human Resource Management

CALCULATING THE SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP) PROGRAM ACCESS INDEX: A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE FOR 2015

STRUCTURAL ISSUES IN RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. Presented by: Susan L. Lasecki P.E., S.E.

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income 2014 Summary

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

Survey of Mineral Admixtures and Blended Cements in Ready Mixed Concrete

ALUMNI MAGAZINE. Media Kit

Armopanel Concrete Wall System. Design Guide B-3.1. BASEMENT WALLS

Knowledge Exchange Report

U.S. Drought Monitor, October 2, 2012

Table 3. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of IRC 2000 and 1997 NEHRP (Continued)

Third Avenue New York, NY. Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report September 30, Michelle L.

An Assessment of Parcel Data in the United States 2005 Survey Results

Salvatore Ray Granata, P.E., S.E. 146 Lee Road 2012 Opelika, AL Work: (678) Cell: (770) salgranata.

A Model Modernization: Edith Green-Wendell Wyatt Federal Building and GSA s Mid-Century Inventory

Trends in. U.S. Delivered Coal Costs: July 2012

Bridge and Highway Solutions

Does your company lease any provider networks from other dental plans or network management companies? (Please check all that apply)

Pollution Control Exemptions for Pipelines

PJM-MISO Stakeholder JCM Briefing June 30, 2005 Joint and Common Market Portal

The next big reliability challenge: EPA revised ozone standard

General Manager: Front Desk Manager: Front Desk/Shift Supervisor: Housekeeping or Environmental Services Manager: Housekeeping Supervisor/Inspector:

Milk Production, Disposition, and Income 2011 Summary

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 7, 2012

PA = Prior Appropriation R = Riparian AD = Absolute Dominion RU = Reasonable Use CR = Correlative Rights RSTMT = Restatement of Torts (Second)

EPA Stormwater Update

The Denver Water System

Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Update of the 2010 RPA Assessment

Legislative Trends: Upcoming Increases to Minimum Wage Round-up 2018

Crop Progress. Corn Mature Selected States [These 18 States planted 93% of the 2015 corn acreage]

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

AWEA State RPS Market Assessment Released September 26, 2017

Facts on Direct-to-Consumer Food Marketing

Cattle. January 1 Cattle Inventory Up 3 Percent

Technical Assignment #3 November 15, 2004 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

Electronic Check Service Quick Reference Guide

Salvatore Ray Granata, P.E., S.E. 146 Lee Road 2012 Opelika, AL Work: (678) Cell: (770) salgranata.

Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ

Crop Progress. NASS Survey Update!

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2016 corn acreage] Corn Emerged - Selected States ISSN:

Meat Animals Production, Disposition, and Income 2015 Summary

NTPEP REGEO Summary of Survey Results Use of the NTPEP REGEO Program and Installation damage Protocol Issues June 2014

Steers weighing 500 pounds and over, as of January 1, 2018, totaled 16.4 million head, down slightly from January 1, 2017.

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

HOLDOWN & STRAP SCHEDULE

90% Design Submittal Structural Calculations Parking Garage CDRL

The Clean Power Plan NJ Clean Air Council Meeting

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage] Corn Emerged - Selected States ISSN:

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21,

Exhibition Attendance Certification

Energy and Regional Economics

Potential Impacts to Texas of EPA s Clean Power Plan. Brian Tulloh Austin Electricity Conference April 9, 2015

American Board of Clinical Psychology (ABCP)

Erie on the Park. Timothy Moore Penn State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Prof. Ali Memari

Crop Progress. Corn Planted - Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage]

Crop Progress. Corn Harvested Selected States [These 18 States harvested 94% of the 2017 corn acreage]

U.S. Political Activity & Public Policy Report 2013

SOLUTIONS BRIDGE AND HIGHWAY. Building to Endure the Test of Time with APRIL Building tomorrow s high rise buildings today.

Overview and Background: Regulation of Power Plants under EPA s Proposed Clean Power Plan

U.S. Drought Monitor, August 14, 2012

Fatal Occupational Injuries in Maine, 2008

Industrial Energy Efficiency as a Resource by Region

Milk Production. January Milk Production up 2.7 Percent

Crop Progress. Corn Silking Selected States [These 18 States planted 92% of the 2017 corn acreage]

Customer Information Sheet

April June Labor Market Outlook. Published by the Society for Human Resource Management. Labor Market Outlook Survey Q (April June)

Transcription:

REINFORCING TABLES 201

REINFORCING TABLES Design Limitations Introduction The structural wall reinforcing and lintel design tables contained within the Appendix of NUDURA s Installation Manual have been prepared consistent with the design principals and practices that have been applied throughout the United States ICF industry for prescriptive design of insulated concrete form walls. The intent of these specific tables is to enable design and building reviewing professionals to competently determine reinforcement requirements for walls specifically constructed using the NUDURA Integrated Building Technology Insulated Concrete Form System. For this reason, reinforcement specifications may vary slightly from prescriptive reinforcement configurations that may be specified within the 2006, 2009 and 2012 International Residential Codes (IRC) or referenced documents therein, as the design reflects the specific geometry and reinforcement capabilities that are unique to the NUDURA Wall System. Design - General 1. These tables apply to one and two family residential structures that conform to the requirements of the 2006, 2009 or 2012 IRC and referenced design guides. All construction shall comply with the appropriate local building Codes. 2. It is the responsibility of the parties involved, including the builder and subcontractors, to review the applicability of these tables and notes to the project specific conditions. The Kachele Group and NUDURA assume no responsibility with regard to the misinterpretation or misuse of the attached tables. 3. If the proposed construction does not meet the design or applicability parameters noted herein, a local design professional shall be retained to prepare the design in accordance with applicable standards and design Codes. 4. These tables have been designed to resist gravity, wind, and earthquake forces, as specifically noted, in accordance with the International Residential Code, along with the design loads and factors that are indicated in Notes 5 & 6 and within the structural tables contained in this appendix. 202

REINFORCING TABLES 5. The following maximum UNFACTORED loads were assumed in the design of the structural tables featured in this appendix: A) Roof Snow Load (Live) = 49 psf (70 psf ground snow load) B) Occupancy Load (Live) = 40 psf C) Roof and Floor Load (Dead) = 15 psf D) Soil Equivalent Fluid Pressure = 30, 45, and 60 psf / ft E) Concrete Density (Dead) = 150 lb/ft 3 F) Seismic Design Categories A, B, C, D 0, D 1, and D 2 6. Design assumes that ALL walls are laterally supported at the top and bottom by building foundation, roof and floor systems, and associated diaphragms, designed by others. 7. Design limits concrete deflection to L/480. 8. Foundation walls are not designed for either hydrostatic pressure or additional lateral soil pressure associated with surcharge loading. These loading conditions require additional review. 9. Design assumes that the minimum 28 day compressive strength of concrete used in the installation shall be 3,000 psi. Actual design of the concrete mix is the responsibility of the ready mix supplier. 10. Design assumes that the reinforcing steel will be deformed rebar, placed in accordance with standard industry practice and ACI placement requirements and shall be supplied at the following yield strength: ASTM A615 Grade 60 (fy = 60 ksi) Grade 40 reinforcement may be substituted at 1.5 times the number of bars noted, or similarly 2/3 the spacing listed for requirements specified as on center spacing 11. All wall reinforcement shall be proportionally and evenly distributed in both the transverse and longitudinal directions of the building. 203

REINFORCING TABLES Design Limitations 12. The following maximum building dimensions are permitted for use: A) Building Width = 60 ft B) Floor Span = 32 ft C) Roof Span = 40 ft 13. Design is limited to one floor below grade and a maximum of two stories above grade, as well as a maximum mean roof height of 35 feet. 14. Maximum height of above grade walls = 10 ft. Reinforcement and wall information provided beyond this height as indicated by tan shaded section on each design table is for estimating purposes only. A local design professional is to be contacted for a site specific design at these locations. 15. Maximum height of foundation walls = 10 ft. Reinforcement and wall information provided beyond this height as indicated by tan shaded section on each design table is for estimating purposes only. A local design professional is to be contacted for a site specific design at these locations. 16. It is the responsibility of the roof or floor designer to ensure that adequate bearing for all framing members is provided on the concrete walls. Use of Design Tables Specific Notes Regarding Vertical & Horizontal Steel Specifications General 17. Height of foundation wall is defined as the distance from the top of the basement floor slab to the point of bearing for the floor system. 18. Backfill height is defined as the distance from the top of the basement floor slab to the finished exterior grade level. 204

REINFORCING TABLES 19. Except as otherwise indicated in Details C-12 through C-16, C-17 and C-19, all below grade wall vertical reinforcing shall be placed with the center axis of the bar being located 1 1/2" from the interior face of the concrete in the ICF forms (on the tension side of the wall). 20. Interpolation between backfill heights and soil equivalent fluid density is not permitted. 21. For walls above grade, vertical reinforcing shall be placed at the middle (or center axis) of the wall. 22. Horizontal reinforcing shall consist of #4 continuous bars at 36 on center, which includes (1) #4 continuous bar within 12 from the top of the wall and at floor levels, unless noted within the wall tables. Rules for Reinforcement at Openings 23. In addition to the wall reinforcing indicated with the design tables of this appendix, a minimum of (2) #4 bars shall be installed at both sides of all openings in concrete, maintaining a minimum cover of 1. Bars shall extend vertically for the full height of the wall pour, as shown in drawing L1 located within the Lintel Design Limitations document for concrete lintels. Vertical bars shall be installed with adequate splices at construction joints. (2) #4 bars shall also be installed at the base of the opening, again extending bars a minimum of 24 beyond both sides of the opening. 24. For foundation walls, the length of solid wall between two openings should be equal to the average width of the openings and shall be no less than a minimum of 4-0. 25. Openings in a foundation wall shall not exceed a maximum width of 6-0. Egress walls outside of the foundation shall be self supporting and shall not be designed or constructed to induce additional lateral loading on the ICF foundation. 26. Each foundation wall shall not have a total width of openings in the wall constituting more than 25% of the length of the wall. 205

REINFORCING TABLES 27. For sections of wall between openings conforming to the above notes, the spacing of the vertical reinforcing must be decreased in these walls by a factor as calculated within the following formula: width of wall between openings. (width of wall between openings + average width of the two openings) 28. If the spacing of the wall vertical reinforcing required between or on each side of openings is determined by the above calculation to be less than 4, a local design professional shall be retained to prepare the design in accordance with applicable standards. Shear Walls 29. Shear walls and lateral resisting elements are to be in accordance with the 2006, 2009 or 2012 IRC. Refer to the additional referenced PCA 100 design guide where required by these Codes, including Seismic Design Category D, and wind speeds exceeding 130 mph, 110 mph, and 100 mph for exposure categories B, C, and D respectively. 30. Reinforcement tables are not to be used for structures classified as irregular in Seismic Design Categories C and D. 31. Reinforcement tables are not to be used for structures located where topographic factors may induce additional lateral loading. Point Loads 32. All point loads, such as concentrated loads created by girder trusses, columns and beams, shall bear directly on top of the concrete wall, and shall not be hung or in any other manner create an eccentric loading on the concrete wall. 33. The minimum horizontal length of solid wall without openings directly below point loads, such as concentrated loads created by girder trusses, columns and beams, shall be 6-0. In addition to the wall reinforcing required within the structural tables of this appendix, two additional #5 vertical bars shall be installed directly below the point load. 206

REINFORCING TABLES Reinforcement at Corners 34. Two full height vertical bars, equal to the vertical reinforcing within the wall system, are to be installed at all corners. Installation General 35. The design and construction of all work on site shall conform to the latest editions of the applicable building codes for the region where installation is taking place, including local applicable code regulations and bylaws as well as all applicable health and safety regulations. Footing Reinforcement 36. Strip footings are to be fitted with dowels to provide connection between the footing and the wall cavity. Dowels shall be installed along the center axis of the strip footings and shall be installed as per the details shown in this appendix. 37. Where footings or frost walls are not a requirement, when the footing is incorporated as part of a slab on grade foundation, dowels shall be embedded in the slab at equal size and spacing as the vertical reinforcement. Minimum embedment into both the slab and wall cavity shall be consistent with bar development and lapping requirements. General Reinforcement Installation 38. Reinforcement placement must be in accordance with the specified design as per these notes and drawings produced in accordance with the NUDURA Structural Tables contained in Appendix C. 39. Minimum bar lap length shall be 40 bar diameters. 207

REINFORCING TABLES Concrete Placement 40. Concrete work shall conform to the latest editions of ACI and ASTM standards for materials, placement, and workmanship: 41. Construction joints shall be made and located so as not to impair the strength of the structure. All specified reinforcing bars shall have minimum lap lengths across all construction joints. 42. Placement of concrete including adequate vibration is the responsibility of the contractor. 43. Concrete pours shall be terminated at locations of lateral support, such as provided by roof and floor systems. Protection of Structure During Installation 44. Adequate frost protection shall be provided for all foundation walls and footings both during construction and in the final installation. 45. The contractor shall make adequate provision to protect concrete from exposure to freezing temperatures and precipitation for at least seven days after concrete placement. 46. Backfill shall be drained in accordance with IRC requirements 47. Walls shall be laterally supported at top and bottom prior to backfilling. 48. Surface grading around the foundation shall be sloped away from building to allow surface runoff to drain away. Provide a minimum slope of 6 over the first 10 feet or adequate drainage swales. 49. The contractor shall make adequate provision for construction loads and temporary bracing to keep structure plumb and in true alignment at all phases of construction. 208

REINFORCING TABLES 50. All work shall conform to the latest editions of ANY of the following codes and standards that are deemed applicable for your region including but not limited to: 2006, 2009 or 2012 International Residential Code. Document PCA 100 as referenced in the 2009 and 2012 IRC. Local building codes, local regulations, and laws Occupational Safety and Health Association Regulations. 209

REINFORCING TABLES D-1 210

REINFORCING TABLES D-2 211

REINFORCING TABLES D-3 212

REINFORCING TABLES D-4 213

REINFORCING TABLES D-5 214

REINFORCING TABLES D-6 215

REINFORCING TABLES D-7 216

REINFORCING TABLES D-8 217

Engineering Certification for USA Appendix D The wall reinforcing tables in Appendix D for use in the USA have been reviewed and certified on June 15, 2017 by Keystone Structural Solutions for use in the continental USA. These tables have also been reviewed for conformance to the following Codes and Regulations: Alabama Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas - 2015 IBC & 2015 IRC - 2012 IBC & 2009 IRC adopted for health care facilities & manufactured. housing statewide. IBC & IRC adopted as by county or jurisdiction - 2012 Arkansas Building Code, 2012 IBC, & 2012 IRC - 2012 California Building Standards Code (California Code of. Regulations, Title 24), 2015 IBC, & 2015 IRC - 2015 IBC, & 2015 IRC adopted for all state-owned buildings, &. facilities, & statewide public schools, junior colleges, & health care. facilities. IBC & IRC adopted as by county or jurisdiction - 2016 Connecticut State Building Code, 2012 IBC, & 2012 IRC - IBC & IRC adopted as by county or jurisdiction - 2013 District of Columbia Building Code, 2012 IBC, & 2012 IRC - 2014 (5 th Edition) Florida Building Code, 2012 IBC, & 2012 IRC - 2012 IBC & 2012 IRC - 2015 IBC adopted for public education facilities statewide except City. of Chicago. IBC & IRC adopted as by county or jurisdiction - 2014 Indiana Building Code, 2005 Indiana Residential Code, 2012 IBC,. & 2003 IRC - 2015 Iowa State Building Code, 2015 IBC, & 2015 IRC adopted for. state-owned or rented structures. IBC & IRC adopted as by county or. jurisdiction - IBC & IRC adopted as by county or jurisdiction

Engineering Certification for USA Appendix D (Continued) Kentucky - 2013 Kentucky Building Code, 2013 Kentucky Residential Code, 2012. IBC, & 2012 IRC Louisiana - 2013 Louisiana State Uniform Construction Code, 2012 IBC, & 2012. IRC Maine - 2009 Maine Uniform Building and Energy Code, 2009 IBC, & 2009 IRC Maryland - 2015 Maryland Building Performance Standards, 2015 IBC, & 2015 IRC Massachusetts - 8 th Edition Massachusetts State Building Code, 2009 IBC, & 2009 IRC Michigan - 2015 Michigan Building Code, 2015 Michigan Residential Code, 2012. IBC, & 2012 IRC Minnesota - 2015 Minnesota State building Code, 2012 IBC, & 2012 IRC Mississippi - 2015 IBC & 2015 IRC Missouri - IBC & IRC adopted as by county or jurisdiction Montana - 2012 IBC & 2012 IRC Nevada - 2012 IBC & 2012 IRC adopted for state-owned buildings. IBC & IRC. adopted as by state or jurisdiction New - 2015 New Hampshire Building Code, 2009 IBC, & 2009 IRC Hampshire New Jersey - 2015 IBC (New Jersey Edition), 2015 IRC (New Jersey Edition), & 2015. International Building and Residential Code (New Jersey Edition Combo) New Mexico - 2015 New Mexico Commercial Building Code, 2015 New Mexico. Residential Building Code, 2015 IBC, & 2015 IRC New York - 2010 Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code, Energy Conservation. Construction Code of New York State, 2015 IBC, & 2015 IRC North Carolina - 2012 North Carolina State Construction Code, 2012 North Carolina. Residential Code, 2009 IBC, & 2009 IRC Ohio - 2011 Ohio Building Code, 2013 Ohio Residential Code, 2009 IBC, &. 2009 IRC Oklahoma - 2015 IBC & 2015 IRC Oregon - 2014 Oregon Structural Specialty Code, 2014 Oregon Residential. Specialty Code, 2012 IBC, & 2009 IRC Pennsylvania - 2015 Pennsylvania Uniform Construction Code, 2009 IBC, & 2009 IRC

Engineering Certification for USA Appendix D (Continued) Rhode Island - 2013 (11 th Edition) Rhode Island Building Code, 2013 (11 th Edition). Rhode Island One and Two Family Dwelling Code, 2012 IBC, & 2012. IRC South Carolina - 2015 South Carolina Building Code, 2015 South Carolina Residential. Code, 2015 IBC, & 2015 IRC Tennessee - 2012 IBC & 2012 IRC Texas - 2006 IBC & 2006 IRC Utah - 2015 IBC & 2015 IRC Vermont - 2015 Vermont Fore and Building Safety Code, & 2015 IBC. IRC adopted. as by county or jurisdiction Virginia - 2012 Virginia Uniform Building Code, 2012 IBC, & 2012 IRC Washington - 2015 Washington State Building Code, 2015 IBC, & 2015 IRC West Virginia - 2015 IBC & 2015 IRC *Version subject to adoption by county Wisconsin - 2011 Wisconsin Commercial Building Code, 2011 Wisconsin Uniform. Dwelling Code, & 2009 IBC Wyoming - 2015 IBC & 2015 IRC