STANDARD OF LIVING,ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ENVIRONMENT IN BULGARIA Prof. Daniela Zlatunova Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Faculty of Geology and Geography, e-mail: mail:zlatunova@gea.uni-sofia.bg Prof. Marin Rwsev - Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Faculty of Geology and Geography, e-mail: rusevm@abv abv.bgbg STANDART OF LIVING,ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ENVIRONMENT IN BULGARIA The countries from Eastern Europe change of the attitude society environment in the transition period; assessment of the ; Energy consumption and pollution of the environment. Three main points are discussed The countries from Eastern Europe change of the attitude society environment in the transition period. Classification of the countries in Europe according to their complex efficiency ( territory, population, GDP, pollution of the air). There are n numbers of factors about spatial objects, such as demographical and ecological density. F = α i E i / α i Where E 1 E n are factors and α 1 are % share. Two indexes: 1.Relative share of given country in respect to four principal indexes of the Europe: Territory - A Population - B Gross domestic product - C Emissions in the air - D 2.Conditional coefficients of density in relation to the territory of the given country (A) : demographical density - economical density - ecological density The territory is constant, so it is important to know, what has happened on it. This method allows harmonizing of the results, independently of the considerable differences in the demographical, economic and ecological parameters.
Social Economic coefficient =F (E + G )/2, Where: F economical density; E demographical density; G ecological density. The social economic coefficient is used for arranging the countries within a given group. The European countries are grouped in four groups according different proportion between the coefficients of density. I st type countries inefficient development - symbol V II nd type countries depressive development symbol \.7.2 2.3-1.44 Serbia 1. 1.39-1.8 1.2.3 2.4-1.2 Armenia 1.31.4 -.47 Moldova ungary 1.29 1...74.91 2. -.9 -.8 Azerbaijan.92.17.8 -.33 Ukraine Czech 1.33. 1.1 1.1 2.3 -.74 -.7 Georgia.78. -.2 Macedonia -.1.9.33 -.8 Bosnia.7.8.48 -.4 Albania 1..31 -.2 This group includes 1 countries and all of them are from the former socialist European counties. They are united in a group on the base of the symbol for complex economic efficiency. It is combination between low Economic density and high demographical and ecological density. Which means that there is a big stress on the environment which do not lead to high standard of living. The Caucasus countries have not so big anthropogenic stress on the environment which is result from low economic activity. III rd type countries - extensive development symbol / IV th type sustainable developing countries symbol Λ 1.2 1.89 1..49.81.83 1.31-1.8.99 1.7 1.4.82.4.2.74 1.7 -.8 Italy 1.92 2.3 1..8 Iceland.3.4.8 -.2 Great Britain 2.7 3.2 2.2 1.1 Belgium 3.11 4. 3.1 1.34 Sweden..2.9 1.99 3.2 1.9 1.4 Switzerlan d 1.7 3.1.2 1.83 olland 4.24.17 2.18 2.9 The III rd group of countries have high standard of living and it is the result of especially big anthropogenic stress on the environment. This group includes ten developed countries from Western Europe. They have low demographical and ecological density but high economic density which provide high standard of living and low environmental degradation.
Energy efficiency key elements of the Classification of the European countries according to their energy efficiency Energy efficiency key elements of the Italy Switzerland Portugal Ireland Ton/fuel/ $ GDP.9 Slovenia Macedonia Czech Republic Estonia Bosnia Latvia Ton/fuel/ $ GDP.22 is the country with one of the lowest energy efficiency in Europe. The main reason for the lowest energy efficiency - lack of efficient energy resources and high extent of using of the lignite. Litva Croatia Moldova.24 Slovakia.24 Belgium.1 Iceland.2 Norway.1 Belarus ungary.17.29 Energy efficiency key elements of the 28% 14% 1% 24% Combustible balance of - 9 % 7% Combustible balance of - 1 27% 3% 44% Coal Petroleum products Natural gas Nuclear energy Others Coal Petroleum products Natural gas Nuclear energy The ineffective fuels are leading in the energy balance of. Is there a transition toward sustainable development in? Structure of the Total Industrial production in (%) Industrial activity Chemical industry Food products Machine - building Energy Metallurgy Logging and Paper and pulp Others Total 89 1 2 27 3 12 92 2 17 11 8 7 94 22 22 1 8 9 2 14 13 98 1 18 11 4 99 21 14 4 There is not a transition toward sustainable development in according to economy restructuring. Is there less Energy consumption in? Million kwh Production of electricity 43 42 41 4 39 9 9 % 8 4 Share in the production of electricity 9 9 Electric Pow er plants Nuclear Pow er plants Water Pow er plants Yes,there is. At present produces less electricity than 9. But the reduction of the electricity production is different for particular Power stations. It decreases by % for thermoelectric power stations; and increases by.9% for Nuclear power stations and also increases by 2.3% in ydro-electric power stations. Consumption of Energy Energy efficiency of the economy Consumption of energy $GDP...37.2.22. Consumption of electricity $TIP (kwh) 2.92 1.83 1.82 1..7.73.4.4.39.3.3 has the lowest energy efficiency which define the lowest.
Is there a decrease or an increase of Is there a decrease or an increase of CO2 equivalent., Gg Total emissions of the greenhouse gases 1 88 91 93 9 97 99 1 The Energy sector has largest share from total emissions in the air about 7%, following by agriculture and industrial processes. The emissions during are decreased with % in comparison to 88, so as a result of this the state of the atmosphere becomes better. Is there a decrease or an increase of Main conclusions Gg, CO2 - екв. Тренд на емисиите на основните ПГ 14 8 4 88 9 91 92 93 94 9 9 97 98 99 1 години The improvement of the atmosphere is not the result from long-term ecological policy and optimization of the economy structure. It is consequence from economic crisis; CO2 C4 N2O ОБЩО The state of the of atmosphere becomes better in the transition period due to decreasing in emissions in the air. Main conclusions The slow economy restructuring toward sustainable development is result of the influence of the two main factors: 1. Lack of financial resources for long- term investments with ecological direction. 2. The predominant foreign investments are directed to the Energy, Metallurgy, Chemical Industry, Cement Industry and Paper and pulp. These branches of the economy form above 7% from air emissions. Tendencies in the development of the Economy of The possible variants for overcome economic crisis are: 1. continues to develop eavy Industry which intensify the ecological crisis; 2. Long term restructuring of industry includes: - an increase in % share of the igh- Technology Industries and a decrease in % share of the export directed branches of the eavy Industry.
Tendencies in the development of the Economy of Tendencies in the development of the Economy of The success of this policy could be guaranteed with significant financial economic support from developed European countries. This approach will contribute for the improvement of the ecological state in local, regional, and global scale.