Application for Historic Review. Reconstruction of a Existing Detached Garage. 815 Washington Street Oregon City

Similar documents
Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development. Applicant: Kevin Bott

2031 Sixth Street. Attachment 1 Draft Findings JULY 20, Structural Alteration Permit LM # PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

524 Arctic Court Property Development Feasibility Study

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Good Rear Porch Enclosure and Remodel PLNHLC East 900 South March 5, 2015

CONSERVATION DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490; Albany, OR 97321

SECTION 5 EXCEPTIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

SECTION 6.3 DOWNTOWN HISTORIC DISTRICT (DTH)

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Neighborhood Suburban Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Neighborhood Traditional Single-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Request. Staff Recommendation. Options. Planning Division Department of Community and Economic Development

The developer / builder desires to follow the Design Guidelines and Design Features as listed below in lieu of the Basic Standards.

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BENT TREE OF ROGERS

CHAPTER 21 - HEIGHT, AREA AND YARD REQUIREMENTS

SECTION GENERAL PROVISIONS PURPOSE.

Overlay Design Guidelines. Prairie Village Overlay Design Guidelines

BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS

Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development. Applicant: OC Tanner, represented by Rob Pett, architect

B-2 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. Uses allowed in the B-2 Community Commercial Business District are subject to the following conditions:

HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Sec Development Standards in P-N-T Districts.

MENDOCINO HISTORICAL REVIEW BOARD 08/1/2016

An ordinance amending CHAPTER 51A, "PART II OF THE DALLAS. DEVELOPMENT CODE," of the Dallas City Code, as amended, by establishing

Residential Design Standards Draft 9 August 2013

City of Aurora, Ohio. Architectural Board of Review. Residential Guidelines

MULTI FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF ROCK HILL, SOUTH CAROLINA

STAFF BRIEF. Kristin Park

GREEN PASTURES - RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW GUIDELINES

Staff Review Date: April 10, 2019 HDC PID#

Corridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

Community Development Department 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321

The Crossing at Twenty Mile

Z HISTORIC DISTRICT Proposed Historic District designation of the Fraber House located at 1612 N. Quincy St.

PART R3-L ZONE, LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE DWELLING DISTRICT

WHEREAS, the proposed Land Management Code (LMC) amendments enhance the design standards to maintain aesthetic experience of Park City; and

ARTICLE 3 OVERLAY ZONES. Table of Contents

An ordinance amending CHAPTER 51A, "PART II OF THE DALLAS. DEVELOPMENT CODE," of the Dallas City Code, as amended, by establishing

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. TRACY AVIARY CONDOR EXHIBIT PLNHLC Liberty Park, 589 East 1300 South September 6, 2012.

HENSON FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION BUILDER PACK

HC15-07; 210 N. Kansas Avenue (One Room Schoolhouse Museum)

Residential Uses in the Historic Village Core

Neighborhood Suburban Multi-Family District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

MISTLETOE HEIGHTS HISTORIC AND CULTURAL DISTRICT GUIDELINES

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION

E Main Street June 14, 2010 Landmarks Commission Meeting

CITY OF ST. HELENA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1480 MAIN STREET- ST. HELENA, CA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 18, 2016

MEMORANDUM PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS

EXHIBIT V G LEHIGH ACRES DESIGN STANDARDS CHECKLIST LEHIGH ACRES PLANNING COMMUNITY

Fence and Wall Requirements

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Catalina. Catalina is a 111 lot, single-family home community by Costain Arizona, Inc.

Holdener Farm Area P.U.D. Enumclaw,Washington DESIGN STANDARDS PHASE ONE

4) Garage placement must be in compliance with Sec. 6.3.G.2 below.

r e s i d e n t i a l o u t s i d e v i l l a g e c e n t e r

EASTERN SE & 750 CHERRY SE - REQUEST FOR NEW BUILDINGS

With Illustrated Guidelines for Implementation

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Terrace Falls Sun Deck PLNHLC & PLNHLC East 3 rd Avenue January 15, 2015

2018 APPROVED/DENIED CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS LETTERS

ORDINANCENO An ordinance amending the zoning ordinances of the City of Dallas, as amended, by

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

MOBILE HOME DISTRICT OR "MH" DISTRICT AND MOBILE HOMES EXCLUSIVE OF MOBILE HOME DISTRICTS (Ord.No )

TOWN OF BRUNSWICK, MAINE

Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community and Economic Development. Conditions of Approval

APPLICATION FOR Second Dwelling Unit

FIRST READING March 26,

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

County Board Adopted September 20, 2014

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING

MEMORANDUM. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Design Review Application #DR Dorset Street

Introduction. Massing and Overall Form. Andalusia I and II

APPLICATION FOR WINDOW/DOOR REPLACEMENT

Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report HEARING DATE: APRIL 20, 2016

RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY BUILDING SETBACKS. April 17, 2014 Staff Memo

MASONRY, ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND BUILDING STANDARDS

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RULES

Certificate of Appropriateness Case Report

BIRMINGHAM HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 3, 2016 Municipal Building Commission Room 151 Martin, Birmingham, Michigan

(Ord , ); (Ord , ) CHAPTER 7-11b. DESIGN STANDARDS: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

STAFF BRIEF. Doors: Unknown

ORDINANCE NO. BEING the northwest portion of City Block 302 and all of City Block 303, and containing approximately acres,

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION. RONALD McDonald HOUSE PLNHLC East South Temple February 2, Request.

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. ATWORTH COMMONS PRELIMINARY PLAT and PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PPU & PPL th Court SW

Corridor Residential Traditional District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

CITY OF SAVANNAH HISTORIC DISTRICT BOARD OF REVIEW REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

7.0 Design Guidelines

Architectural Inventory Form

LDR RESIDENTIAL LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (LDRs) CODE UPDATE C.O.W. January 19, 2017

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES (RF)

CITY OF SNOHOMISH Founded 1859, Incorporated 1890

Appearance Review Board Staff Report

MAGENS BAY ARCHETECTURAL REVIEW GUIDELINES

Village of Greendale. Building Board Principals and Standards of Review

Corridor Residential Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

An ordinance amending CHAPTER 51A, "PART II OF THE DALLAS DEVELOPMENT

HISTORIC PROPERTIES COMMISSION DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

RZ-1 LEGEND FUTURE ACCESS TO ALIGN W/ EXISTING HARRIS COVE DRIVE FUTURE ACCESS TO ALIGN WITH PROPOSED ACCESS OPPOSITE COX ROAD

Transcription:

Application for Historic Review Reconstruction of a Existing Detached Garage 815 Washington Street Oregon City 1

Project: Application: Garage reconstruction Historic Review for new construction with preservation incentive Applicant: Property Owner: Design/ Construction Denyse McGriff Denyse McGriff & Rob Guttridge 815 Washington Street Oregon City, Oregon 97045 WILLCO Construction Aluna Schroeder 920 SE Caruthers Street Portland, Oregon 97214 Project Information Site Address: Site Area: Zone: House, c.1912 815 Washington Street, Oregon City, Oregon T2S R2E Section 31AA Tax Lot 11300 3,780 square foot lot area/249 +/- square foot garage R-3.5 McLoughlin Conservation District Designated Historic Landmark: The H.B. & Pearl Cartlidge Proposed Project: Reconstruction of a detached single-car garage in the same as the existing structure 2

Project Summary: The project will be to reconstruct the existing detached single-car garage. The garage is located adjacent to the historic resource, the H.B. & Pearl Cartlidge House. The house was designed and built by the Fredrick and William White, architects and builders. It is noted that Harry B. Cartlidge contributed to the design. The property is located in the McLoughlin Conservation District. The property is located in the original plat of Oregon City, Block 52, lot 2. The property is located in the Latourette Canyon portion of the District and surround by other historic resources Adjacent resources include to the north: the OA Pace Residence-1926, east- St. Paul s Episcopal Church & the H. Leighton Kelly House-c.1900; south- Judge Harvey Cross House, 1885-90; west- John Inskeep House-1914; George Hankins House- c.1914 and the Kent Moody Residence-1922. The existing garage is the second detached structure on the property. The current garage was constructed in the 1940 s by the former owner, Mrs. Winifred Preston. The garage is approximately 249 +/- square feet. There is a small window in the rear façade and an opening for a single garage door (9x7). The siding is California drop. The garage is being crushed by a large cedar tree, on its rear elevation and the 70 year old foundation is crumbling. The tree will be removed to allow for the reconstruction of the garage. The reconstruction garage will have the same California drop siding; a small window in the rear elevation and a carriage style garage door. The garage was constructed 4.8 feet from the rear property line and.83 feet from the north property line. A preservation incentive is being requested to allow for the garage to be reconstructed in the same location on the north elevation. The north façade will be constructed with a 1 to 2 hour fire wall. All applicable building codes will be followed. The adjacent property concurs with the reconstruction (see attached statement). The following design is being proposed: The existing window on the rear elevation will be rehabbed to be reused. If the window cannot be rehabilitated then a new window will match the existing. The garage will be painted to match the main body and trim colors as the main house. The garage will add a small parapet on the front elevation and a two trim pieces similar to the detail on the porch. The pergola will be reattached to the garage and the driveway area will remain the same. Historic Design Review Criteria and narrative response: A. Except as provided pursuant to subsection I of this section, no person shall alter any historic site in such a manner as to affect its exterior appearance, nor shall there be any new construction in an historic district, conservation district, historic corridor, or on a landmark site, unless a certificate of appropriateness has previously been issued by the historic review board. Any building addition that is thirty percent or more in area of the historic building (be it individual or cumulative) shall be considered new construction in a district. 3

Further, no major public improvements shall be made in the district unless approved by the board and given a certificate of appropriateness. This project requires historic design review. B. Archeological Monitoring Recommendation. For all projects that will involve ground disturbance. The foundation and ground disturbance occurred with the construction of the garage in 1948. C. For exterior alterations of historic sites in an historic district or conservation district or individual landmark, the criteria to be used by the board in reaching its decision on the certificate of appropriateness shall be: 1. The purpose of the historic overlay district as set forth in Section 17.40.010 The reconstruction of the accessory garage will continue to enhance the preservation of the historic resource 2. The provisions of the city comprehensive plan; The comprehensive plan supports and promotes the preservation and enhancement of historic resources 3. The economic use of the historic site and the reasonableness of the proposed alteration and their relationship to the public interest in the structure's or landmarks preservation or renovation; The property has been used as single-family residence since its construction in 1912. The reconstruction of the garage will continue to support the residential occupancy of the property. 4. The value and significance of the historic site; The Cartlidge House was the first building constructed on the east portion of Block 52, of the original 1844 plat of Oregon City. The house is significant for its age, style, association with the White Brothers and HB Cartlidge. 5. The physical condition of the historic site; The condition of the property is excellent. The reconstruction of the garage will enhance the value of the property 6. The general compatibility of exterior design, arrangement, proportion, detail, scale, color, texture and materials proposed to be used with the historic site; The garage will be reconstructed to match the existing structure. New garage doors are being proposed as well as exterior lighting (similar to porch lightening the house). 7. Pertinent aesthetic factors as designated by the board; 8. Economic, social, environmental and energy consequences; and The reconstruction garage will continue to provide off street parking on one of the owner s vehicles as well as storage of tools and bicycles. 9. Design guidelines adopted by the historic review board. The reconstructed garage will use the same siding as the house and feature a cornice and appropriate trim features around the window and garage door. The garage will be repainted to match the house body and trim colors. The proposed single car garage door shown on sheet A2.1, will have rectangular windows and panels in keeping with key elements on the house. The window will either be refurbished or a new window fabricated to match the existing multiplied wood window. The reconstructed garage will be sited in the same location as the existing garage. The garage is currently is smaller in scale of the house. The area around the garage has a paved driveway pad and a concrete walkway between the house and garage. No new landscaping is being proposed, other than a new climbing rose for the pergola. 4

Context photos: Looking East St. Paul s Episcopal Church Looking East Rectory and H. Leighton Kelly House 5

Looking South Judge Harvey Cross Residence Looking North O. A. Pace Residence 6

Existing Garage: Front Elevation Washington Street Side Elevation South 7

Southwest Corner (with tree) Interior Rear Elevation- interior 8

North Elevation North Elevation 2 9

H.B. and Pearl Cartlidge House, 1912 10

House in 1948 11