Susquehanna River Smallmouth Bass Disease Investigation

Similar documents
BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER OUTSIDE AGENCY DATA AND QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Susquehanna River Health What are the Fish and Water Quality Telling Us? By John Arway, PFBC Executive Director 26 April 2011

EXISTING AND READILY AVAILABLE DATA

Final Total Maximum Daily Load for the Susquehanna River, PCBs

Large River Semi-wadeable MMI. Dustin Shull 2017

An Evaluation of Antes Creek. Antes Creek has a drainage area of square miles and is a tributary of the

Impaired Watersheds and Stream Designations in Adams County

Nutrients. Water Quality Planning Branch Water Division Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality

303d Ag Impaired Delisting Process. Agricultural Advisory Board December 16, 2015

2012 Nutrient Regulations Update

5.0 NUTRIENT TMDL COMPONENTS

Draft National Rivers and Stream Assessment. Overview and Key Findings NRSA 2008/09

Final Total Maximum Daily Load for the Monongahela River, Greene County PCBs and Chlordane

Final Total Maximum Daily Load Allegheny River, Allegheny County PCBs

ARKANSAS NUTRIENT CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT. EPA Region 6 Nutrient RTAG Dallas, Texas April 14, 2015

Washington State Department of Ecology: Biological Assessment Model Development and Use in State Regulatory Programs

Septic Systems in High Quality and Exceptional Value Watersheds

Appendix D Monitoring Program

Jordan River TMDL Update

Septic Systems in High Quality and Exceptional Value Watersheds

John Vile, MS Water Monitoring & Standards Bureau of Freshwater and Biological Monitoring

Continuous Diurnal D. O. Water Monitoring. Water Monitoring and Standards Bureau of Freshwater and Biological Monitoring

2018 Monitoring Strategy for the Des Plaines River Watershed. Purpose

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER CAUSE AND EFFECT SURVEY PROTOCOL DECEMBER 2015

Morro Bay Watershed Creek Health For Water Year 2017

What is the purpose of the plan? Why did we choose Raccoon Creek? What pollutants does this TMDL address? Where do the pollutants come from?

REPORT ON RABBIT CREEK SPECIAL STUDY SUBWATERSHED 5.19

Jordan River Total Maximum Daily Load Study. Presented By: James Harris Utah Division of Water Quality

Maine Biological and Nutrient Criteria. Tom Danielson and Dave Courtemanch Maine DEP

Preamble: Proposed Stream Nutrient Assessment Procedure

Standards and Assessment

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

Update on Water Quality Models. TMDL Review Process

Pennsylvania s TMDL Program

2014 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Methods

EXPERT WITNESS CONFERENCING

Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Restoration:

Delaware River Basin Commission

Status of Water Quality in Ohio: The 2018 Integrated Report. April 25, 2018

Assessment Decision Report Indian Creek

6.1. UTILIZATION OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING DATA TO SUPPORT THE CITY OF DETROIT S LONG TERM COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW CONTROL PLAN.

INFORMATION SHEET. Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Bens Creek, located in Portage and Washington Townships, Cambria County, Pennsylvania

APPENDIX A-3 SALUDA HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT LOWER SALUDA RIVER BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE MONITORING AND ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

Presented by Jack Pflaumer

Ohio Bioassessments - Applicatio

QUICK FACTS. Stream Miles: Impaired Stream Miles: 0. DEP Listed Impairments: None. Watershed Municipalities:

Fact Sheet. Pennsylvania s Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy Goals for Nutrient and Sediment Reduction and Habitat Restoration

Tina Laidlaw US EPA 1

What is the purpose of the plan? Why did we choose Raccoon Creek? What pollutants does this TMDL address? Where do the pollutants come from?

Long Prairie River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) Report Summary

The Snapshot CONODOGUINET CREEK WATERSHED SNAPSHOT

INFORMATION SHEET. What is being proposed? A TMDL plan to improve the quality of water in the Redbank Creek Watershed.

Watershed Investigations: How to Assess the Health of a Stream

Marcelo Cerucci, Ph.D., Gopi Jaligama, Thomas Amidon, and James Cosgrove, P.E. Omni Environmental LLC 321 Wall Street Princeton, New Jersey

Report on Biological & Water Quality Monitoring in the East Branch DuPage Watershed: 2014

Pennsylvania DEP Multihabitat Stream Assessment Protocol

Aquatic Ecosystems of the Pittsburgh District

A BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE MULTIMETRIC INDEX FOR LARGE SEMI-WADEABLE RIVERS: TECHNICAL REPORT

Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy 26 East Exchange Street Suite 206 Saint Paul, MN

PA Bureau of Forestry. Water Monitoring i for Evaluation of Potential Effects of Shale-Gas Development on State Forest Lands. Presented by: Ryan Szuch

R.N. Nordin Ph.D. Resource Quality Section Water Management Branch Ministry of Environment (now called Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection)

Factsheet: Town of Deep River Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Appendix B: Analysis Worksheets

The Cuyahoga River Tributaries and Ship Channel 2018 Survey

Sabine River Basin Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Data Summary Report compiled by Texas Watch

Surveys of the Nation s Waters

Factsheet: Town of Trumbull Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Overview of PADEP 2014 Integrated List of All Waters (from Draft 2014 Pennsylvania Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report )

Fish Health, Pesticides and Endocrine Disruptors

Preliminary Draft Plan for Development of Nutrient Criteria in Maryland

Factsheet: Town of Hamden Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Factsheet: City of West Haven Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Modeling Eutrophication Processes in the Delaware Estuary to Link Watershed Efforts to Control Nutrient Impacts

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER RECREATIONAL USE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLING PROTOCOL

Today s Webinar: Types of Monitoring and Assessment Data and What They Mean

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey

Factsheet: Town of East Lyme Water Quality and Stormwater Summary

Impact of an Agricultural Point Source on Macroinvertebrate Communities and Water Quality on the Lamoille River

INFORMATION SHEET. Proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Stump Creek, Jefferson and Clearfield Counties, Pennsylvania

Understanding the 2014 NC Water Quality Assessment for the Integrated Report / 305(b)

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Numeric Nutrient Criteria: Current Status

Implementation Guidelines for the AMD Set-Aside Program in Pennsylvania. By Pam Milavec and Eric Cavazza Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation

Redwood Shores Lagoon November 2016 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2019 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Investment in the Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative: What s Different This Time Around

2010, 2012, 2016, and 2018 Integrated Reports Classified Use Support Evaluation. Compiled, Evaluated, and Written by R. W.

Watershed - Lake Model to Support TMDL Determinations for Lake Thunderbird

Watershed Monitoring Programs in Fairfax County

2017 Clean Rivers Program Steering Committee Meeting. March 10, 2016 Karnes City Lodge 309 S. US HWY 181, Karnes City, TX 78118

Critical Period for the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

Grand Marais Creek WRAP Stakeholder Meeting. April 18, 2013

Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2017 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

DRAFT CONTINUOUS PHYSICOCHEMICAL ASSESSMENT METHOD

North Carolina Nutrient Criteria Development Plan

Revised PCB Water Quality Criterion for Zones 2-6 and Enhanced Implementation for the Stage 2 PCB TMDLs for the Delaware Estuary

Biomonitoring in New Jersey: Status, Gaps, and Refinements

Finalizing the Chesapeake Bay Health Index (BHI)

Development of Nutrient Criteria for Wyoming Streams and Lakes

Eric McCleary. ACES and Ecosytem Markets Conference Ft. Lauderdale, Florida December 10-14, 2012

2017 Data Report for Fern Lake, Grand Traverse County

Transcription:

Susquehanna River Smallmouth Bass Disease Investigation May 9, 2013 Dial-in number for Audio: 1-877-668-4493 Event Number: 647 572 664 WebEx Technical Support: 866-229-3239 Note: You will not hear any audio until the beginning of the webinar. To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event.

AGENDA 1. Welcome 2. Review of 2012 Study 3. Preview of 2013 Study 4. Questions & Comments Note: WebEx Technical Support is available at 866-229-3239

Integrated Reporting Process DEP continually assesses streams, rivers, and lakes across the state. The Federal Clean Water Act requires DEP to report on the condition of all waters in Pennsylvania every two years. The report is a known as the Integrated Report. It is large and consists of many parts. The part that interests most is Category 5, the list of impaired waters. This is also known as the 303(d) list

Impairment: The Definition Impairment - All waters where required pollution controls are not sufficient to attain or maintain applicable water quality. In other words, there is more pollution entering the water than can be assimilated causing damage to the aquatic life, water supply, recreation, or consumption of fish.

Impairment: The Consequences Impaired water is placed on the impaired waters list of the biennial Integrated Report. A TMDL (pollution budget) must be developed for every impaired water. EPA recommends a TMDL be completed and approved within 13 years of the listing. A TMDL determines how much pollution must be removed by each source to fix an impairment.

Impairment: The Consequences There can be substantial costs to achieve the needed pollution reductions. The impaired listing and the TMDL can be legally challenged by affected parties. All listings and TMDLs must be based on science that justifies the pollution reductions and can withstand legal challenge. The information available during the evaluation for the 2012 Integrated Report did not meet the standards required to impair 98 miles of the river.

Impairment: the Facts No special monetary funds come with an impairment listing. Should at some point the river be determined to be impaired, TMDL development would take many years to complete. An impairment is not needed for cooperation. DEP is cooperating with any one concerning the river with or with out an impaired listing. The decision not to impair the river was based solely on the recommendation of DEP technical staff after review of the data and not on politics.

Susquehanna: The Responsibility The proper course was to expand and intensify studies to determine if there is an impairment caused by pollution and if so what are the cause(s). DEP has committed as many staff and funds as possible to the studies. The remainder of this presentation will be about what was done in 2012 and what is being done in 2013.

2012 Water Quality Monitoring Continuous Instream Water Quality Monitoring (CIM) Water Chemistry Grab Sampling Discrete Water Quality Transect Characterization Periphyton (Algae)Monitoring Macroinvertebrate Sampling (Aquatic Insects) Androgenicity/Estrogenicity Passive Sampler Deployment

2012 Monitoring Locations

2012 Delaware Monitoring Location

2012 Harrisburg Monitoring Location

Cont. Instream Water Quality Monitoring (CIM) Deployed at 8 locations over the period Mid-July to early September Dissolved Oxygen Water Temperature Specific Conductance ph

Cont. Instream Water Quality Monitoring (CIM) Next four slides show 30-minute reading from each CIM at the three Harrisburg sites There were differences in water quality comparing the Harrisburg West, Middle, and East sites. Susquehanna partitions into three rivers as a result of upstream influences. More on this later in the presentation. Temperature did not vary as much as dissolved oxygen, ph, and specific conductance.

Cont. Instream Water Quality Monitoring (CIM) Dissolved Oxygen, Susquehanna at Harrisburg Sample Location 6/14/12-8/31/2012

Cont. Instream Water Quality Monitoring (CIM) Temperature, Susquehanna at Harrisburg Sample Location 6/14/12-8/31/2012

Cont. Instream Water Quality Monitoring (CIM) ph, Susquehanna at Harrisburg Sample Location 6/14/12-8/31/2012

Cont. Instream Water Quality Monitoring (CIM) Specific Conductance, Susquehanna at Harrisburg Sample Location 6/14/12-8/31/2012

CIM Dissolved Oxygen Minima dissolved oxygen for the period occurred on July 8, 2012 Harrisburg West - 5.45 mg/l Harrisburg Middle - 5.35 mg/l Harrisburg East - 6.26 mg/l Juniata at Newport North - 4.79 mg/l Sunbury East - 5.93 mg/l Delaware River Morrisville West - 6.74 Delaware River Morrisville East - 6.72 mg/l.

CIM Dissolved Oxygen Example showing dissolved oxygen daily fluctuations at the three Harrisburg sites and the minimum that occurred on July 8, 2012

CIM ph Maxima ph for the period across sample locations and sample sites varied temporally. Values were consistently higher at Juniata River Newport North and Delaware River Morrisville East and West. The highest maxima (9.61) occurred at Delaware River Morrisville East and the lowest (8.43) occurred at Susquehanna Sunbury West.

CIM ph As will be discussed later, both the level and the amount of time that a ph level persists must both be taken into account when assessing ph. The next slide shows an example of ph readings using the data collected by the CIMs at the Harrisburg location.

CIM ph Maxima ph, Susquehanna at Harrisburg Sample Location 6/15/12-6/29/2012

CIM ph Summary of maximum and mean ph at each site Maxima and Mean ph, All Sites

Evaluation of CIM Data Certain standards must be met in order to properly assess data from CIMs. Quality assurance protocols must be followed. Instruments must be periodically calibrated and the final readings corrected for drift. The analytical uncertainty is the ability of the instrument to discriminate between small differences in a measurement. This uncertainty must be considered when an ambient measurement is compared to a numeric WQS criterion. The CIMs must be placed in an area that is representative of the stream segment as a whole.

Defining Criteria Exceedance Dissolved Oxygen and ph criteria are defined in Pennsylvania s water quality standards in Chapter 93.7. These criteria must be met 99% of the time as defined in Chapter 96.3(c) of the water quality standards. CIM data is unique in that data can be continuously recorded at 15-, 30- or 60-minute intervals. Period of evaluation is one year. If a CIM is not deployed for an entire year then there must be justification for extrapolating the available results to a year. In this case, the CIMs were deployed during the critical time of year (low flows and warm temperatures) when dissolved oxygen is lowest and ph highest.

Defining Criteria Exceedance The table below characterizes common sampling rates or how often data is recorded and the number of criteria exceedances that would be expected for impairment of a water. Sample Sample Rate Exceedances Expected for Impairment 15 Minutes 351 30 Minutes 176 60 Minutes 89

Summary of CIM Data Percent Criteria Exceedances for ph and Dissolved Oxygen CIM data. Percentage greater than 1.00 is impairment. Sample Site 2012 Parameter % Criteria Exceedance Delaware East ph 1.81 Delaware East Dissolved Oxygen 0 Delaware West ph 0.23 Delaware West Dissolved Oxygen 0 Juniata Newport ph 0.7 Juniata Newport Dissolved Oxygen 0 Susquehanna Harrisburg West ph 0.36 Susquehanna Harrisburg West Dissolved Oxygen 0 Susquehanna Harrisburg Middle ph 0 Susquehanna Harrisburg Middle Dissolved Oxygen 0 Susquehanna Harrisburg East ph 0 Susquehanna Harrisburg East Dissolved Oxygen 0 Susquehanna Sunbury West ph 0 Susquehanna Sunbury West Dissolved Oxygen 0 Susquehanna Sunbury East ph 0 Susquehanna Sunbury East Dissolved Oxygen 0

Water Chemistry Grab Sampling Del. E. Del. W. New. N. HBG East HBG Mid. HBG West Sun. W. Sun. E. (Dissolved Ortho-Phosphorous was not detectable all Susquehanna sites)

Discrete Water Quality Transect Characterization The Susquehanna at Harrisburg sample location exhibited the most discernible differences in water quality moving across the river from bank to bank. The Harrisburg North transect data is used as the example in the following slides. The other Harrisburg sites showed a similar pattern.

Discrete Water Quality Transect Characterization

Susquehanna River @ Harrisburg Discrete Water Quality Transects

Susquehanna River @ Harrisburg Discrete Water Quality Transects

Susquehanna River @ Harrisburg Discrete Water Quality Transects

Susquehanna River @ Harrisburg Discrete Water Quality Transects

Susquehanna River @ Harrisburg (Three Distinct Influences) Harrisburg East is heavily influenced by the Susquehanna Mainstem Harrisburg Middle is heavily influenced by the West Branch Susquehanna Harrisburg West is heavily influenced by the Juniata River

Periphyton Monitoring (Fixed Transect & Random) A nutrient study plan was implemented at each sample location to: Characterize nutrient levels in surface water Measure nutrient levels in algae Measure algal biomass Identify the types of algae in the river The study was divided into two phases: Phase 1 intense targeted transect nutrient and algal sampling conducted during the summer low-flow critical condition. Phase 2 - random site selection, artificial substrate nutrient and algal sampling effort, also conducted during the summer low-flow.

Random Periphyton Block & Tile Sampler

Fixed Transect Periphyton Sampled Rocks

Periphyton Monitoring (Fixed Transect & Random) Samples are now being analyzed and interpreted by: Dr. Hunter Carrick Central Michigan University

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Macroinvertebrates (aquatic insects, snails, clams, etc.) were collected mid-july through mid-august at each Phase 1 sample site The Susquehanna is a wide river and there is variation in water quality across the width. As a result, multiple macroinvertebrate samples collected across the width are required to properly characterize the river at a location. As an example, the Susquehanna at Harrisburg sample location had three sets of samples collected, one each at the Susquehanna at Harrisburg East, Middle and West sites. The collections are summarized by calculating biological index scores. The next slide shows two relevant individual indicies; taxa richness and intolerant taxa. The index of biological integrity (IBI) score is a composite of several important indicies. The indices ranged from fair to good.

Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Relationship between selected metrics and the large IBI score at sample locations.

Androgenicity/Estrogenicity Passive Sampler Deployment Polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS) were deployed for approximately 30 days during July and August, 2012. POCIS samplers collect water quality data that are not always detectable in grab water samples, because some pollutants can be harmful at less than detectable levels. Pollutant data were collected as total androgenicity and estrogenicity. They were placed at all three Susquehanna River at Harrisburg sites and at the Delaware River at Morrisville East site (control). Grab water samples were also collected during sampler deployment and sampler retrieval. Total estrogenicity results are reported but the androgenicity is still to be analyzed by the National Cancer Institute.

Sampling POCIS in Susquehanna River August 2012

Total Estrogenicity Sample Results Location Site Grab Water Sample @ Deployment EEQ* (ng/l) Grab Water Sample @ Retrieval EEQ (ng/l) ng/poci S Susquehanna River @ Harrisburg Harrisburg East BD** BD 0.879 Susquehanna River @ Harrisburg Harrisburg Middle BD BD 0.617 Susquehanna River @ Harrisburg Harrisburg West 0.174 BD 2.948 Delaware River @ Morrisville Morrisville BD BD 1.222 Fabrication Blank N/A -- -- BD Field Blank All -- -- BD *EEQ = estrogen equivalents **BD = below detection; detection limit = 0.35 ng/l All grab samples were either below detection or less than one. POCIS results represent an accumulation over a 30-day period. Estrogenicity was over one at the Harrisburg West and Delaware Trenton sites. But since the results are a 30- day total it cannot be determined if the exposure was ever over one on a daily or hourly basis.

Proposed Water Quality Monitoring 2013 Water Chemistry Grab Sampling Discrete Water Quality Transect Characterization Continuous Instream Water Quality Monitoring (CIM) Periphyton Monitoring (Fixed Transect & Random) Experimental Periphyton Growth Studies at Varying Nutrient Levels. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Androgenicity/Estrogenicity Passive Sampler Deployment Routine Fish Tissue Sampling Semi-Quantitative Fish Sampling (Great River and Wadable) Herbicide/Pesticide Storm Sampling @ WQN Stations

Proposed Water Quality Monitoring 2013 Multi-Agency Cooperation DEP will continue to cooperate with: PFBC on its young-of-year smallmouth bass studies. USGS studying the fish pathology. USGS Northern Appalachian Research Laboratory with an experiment involving nutrients, sediment, and their effect on stream periphyton. The Susquehanna River Basin Commission during its river studies.

Proposed Water Quality Monitoring 2013

Proposed Water Quality Transects 2013

Proposed Water Quality Transects 2013 Discrete Water Quality Transect CIM Algae Phase 1 (Site) Algae Phase 2 Sediment (Site) PFBC YOY (Site) WQN (Site) Susquehanna - Danville X Danville WQN0301 West Branch Sus. - Lewisburg X Lewisburg WQN0401 Susquehanna - Sunbury X West & East West Shady Nook WQN0203 Susquehanna - Browns Island X X Mahantango Susquehanna - Clemson Island X X New Buffalo Juniata - Newtown Hamilton X X Newtown Hamilton Juniata - Thompsontown X X Thompsontown Juniata - Lewistown Narrows X X X X Tony's TBD Juniata - Newport X South & North South? WQN0214 Susquehanna - Rockville X X West Rockville TBD Susquehanna - Harrisburg North X East Susquehanna - Harrisburg Middle X Middle & West Susquehanna - Harrisburg South X Fairview WQN0202 Susquehanna - Dock Street Susquehanna - Marietta X West & East West Wrightsville WQN0201 Delaware - Morrisville X West & East East WQN0101 Allegheny Franklin X West West Franklin WQN0804(Intactive)

Great River Fish Sampling 2013 Large River Fish Sampling CIM Site(s)/Location Site Description(s) PFBC YOY (Site) WQN (Site) Susquehanna - Great Bend TBD TBD Hallstead WQN0306 Susquehanna - Falls TBD TBD Falls WQN0307 Susquehanna - Danville TBD X TBD Danville WQN0301 West Branch Sus. - Karthaus TBD X TBD WQN0404 West Branch Sus. - Jersey Shore TBD TBD WQN0448 West Branch Sus. - Lewisburg X TBD Lewisburg WQN0401 Susquehanna - Sunbury X 2 West & East Shady Nook WQN0203 Susquehanna - Browns Island TBD X 2 West & East Mahantango Susquehanna - Clemson Island TBD X 2 West & East New Buffalo Juniata - Newtown Hamilton TBD X TBD Newtown Hamilton Juniata - Thompsontown TBD X TBD Thompsontown Juniata - Lewistown Narrows X TBD X Tony's TBD Juniata - Newport X 2 South & North? WQN0214 Susquehanna - Harrisburg North X 1 East Susquehanna - Harrisburg Middle X 2 Middle & West Susquehanna - Marietta X 2 West & East Wrightsville WQN0201 Delaware - Morrisville X 2 West & East WQN0101

QUESTIONS? Please type your questions into the chat window.