Major Groups and Other Stakeholders High Level Political Forum Coordination Mechanism Terms of Reference

Similar documents
Major Groups and Other Stakeholders High Level Political Forum Coordination Mechanism Terms of Reference

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Common guidelines for major groups and other stakeholders to report to the high-level political forum on their implementation of the 2030 Agenda

Procedures and practices in civil society involvement by DESA

8 June Excellency,

Memorandum of Understanding Between VNGOC and NYNGOC

General Assembly review of 68/1 Co-Facilitators' zero draft resolution

Scope, modalities, format and organization of the high-level meeting on universal health coverage

The NGO Major Group Terms of Reference for Organizing Partners (OPs) (DRAFT 29 January 2016)

20 June Excellency,

26 August 09. Guidelines for Participation of Major Groups and Stakeholders in Policy Design at UNEP.

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest considerations.

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

6 July Excellency,

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

New York, November 14 th 2015

UNITED NATIONS MANDATES ON NGO ACCREDITATION AND PARTICIPATION IN UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCES AND MEETINGS

Comprehensive contribution:

(I) ~ 16 December Excellency,

Modalities for the 2016 Economic and Social Council Forum on Financing for Development follow-up Proposals by the ECOSOC Bureau

Further to my letter dated 12 June 2018,1 have the honour to enclose

29 March Please accept, Excellency, the assurances of my highest consideration.

The text now meets with the unanimous agreement of all delegations.

Pacific Resilience Partnership (PRP) Governance Structure

Universities and the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda

Harmonizing Gender in the Three Rio Conventions and the GEF

2007/40 Non-legally binding instrument on all types of forests

The United Nations Environment Assembly Made Easy to Understand Webinar, 17 June 2014

How to engage with the High Level Political Forum (HLPF) user guide

Arrangements for observer participation in the Board meetings

Lambert Okrah Major Groups Partnership on Forests Public Seminar March 9, 2016 Tokyo, Japan

I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China.

United Nations Environment Assembly of the United Nations Environment Programme

2/5. Delivering on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

CONSTITUTION OF THE ECOSYSTEM-BASED ADAPTATION FOR FOOD SECURITY ASSEMBLY

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

Ibstock plc. (the Company) Audit Committee - Terms of Reference

Civil Society Europe Draft Statutes (adopted on 18 December 2015 and established in front of a notary on 19 February 2016)

OVERARCHING FRAMEWORK UNEP GLOBAL MERCURY PARTNERSHIP

FOREST EUROPE Structures, Procedures and Work Modalities

Improving Trade Union Development Cooperation Effectiveness

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 December [on the report of the Second Committee (A/68/439)]

Making HLPF fit for purpose. Input from the panel at UN OSD by Jan-Gustav Strandenaes

UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

(I' \\IJ! 20 February Excellency,

28 February Miroslav Lajčák. All Permanent Representatives and Permanent Observers to the United Nations New York

HER EXCELLENCY MS. MARIE CHATARDOVÁ PRESIDENT OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL

Report of the Secretary General on Critical milestones towards coherent, efficient and inclusive follow-up and review at global level

Diversity of Cultural Expressions

BC-10/3: Indonesian-Swiss country-led initiative to improve the effectiveness of the Basel Convention

The decision of EFSA s Management Board to extend the mandate and composition of EFSA s Stakeholder Consultative Platform until 30 June ;

13 February Excellency,

Guidelines on Partners Engagement

NGO Proposal on the Structure for the 2011 Review of the Human Rights Council s Work and Functioning

Decision IG.21/13. Governance

Advancing the 2030 Agenda: Lessons learnt from the first cycle of the High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF)

About GYBN...3. Guiding principles...4. Establishment of GYBN...6. Youth Participation in the CBD...7. GYBN Structure...9. Membership...

Draft action plan for DCF-GPEDC complementarity and synergies

Cities Alliance CHARTER

7 th Economic and Social Council Youth Forum

Action for Sustainable Development ( Platform Governance Proposal for Bogota Meeting 29 April 2016

ICAP Governance Framework

RAVEN RUSSIA LIMITED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Terms of reference of the Audit Committee

GUIDING FOR ACCOUNTABILITY:

Corporate Governance Statement Australian Men s Shed Association

TWN. Third World Network. Expert group meeting on the agenda-setting for the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) 30 April 2014, New York

We aim at distributing to all Member States the revised version of the modalities resolution on Thursday 19 November 2015.

Improving the working methods of the Security Council

International Seminar on Challenges to SFM:

Questionnaire on scope and methodology of a global sustainable development report

POLICY ON STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Philippine Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (PH-EITI) Multi-Stakeholder Group (PH-EITI MSG) Amended Terms of Reference

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2017/134

PRINCIPLES GOVERNING RELATIONS BETWEEN THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS 1

Council Working Group on international Internet- related public policy issues

GOVERNANCE PLAN DRAFT. Operating Guidelines for the Central New York Population Health Improvement Program Advisory Structure

UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT (CSTD), twentieth session Geneva, 8-12 May 2017

Economic and Social Council

CHARTER OF THE GLOBAL JUDICIAL INSTITUTE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

Independent Assessment of the International Arrangement on Forests (IAF) Report ot the Team of Independent Consultants Team Presentation to AHEG 2

A/C.2/67/L.22. General Assembly. United Nations. Final Draft 6 December 2012

LUPP. Good Practice. Series. Urban Participatory Planning: The role of Resident Area Development Organisations

Report of the Independent Group of Experts on New Mechanisms for Stakeholder Engagement at UNEP

Critical milestones towards a coherent, efficient, and inclusive follow-up and review of the 2030 Agenda at the global level COVER NOTE:

THE NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES BYLAWS

Avenues for Advocacy in the U.N. Human Rights Council

Briefing Session Package for Civil Society Organizations & Other Stakeholders

A/HRC/25/NGO/176. General Assembly. United Nations

Joint UNDP, UNFPA and UNOPS Executive Board Orientation Briefing

CARIBBEAN POLICY DEVELOPMENT CENTRE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

1. Background. UPR cycle

ICC BASIS submission to enhanced cooperation consultation

ADVANCED UNEDITED VERSION

Remarks by. H.E. Mr. John W. Ashe President of the 68 th Session of the United Nations General Assembly

IPU Committee on United Nations Affairs Item 4 10 October 2011

The Gym Group plc. (the Company ) Audit and Risk Committee - Terms of Reference. Adopted by the board on 14 October 2015 (conditional on Admission)

Regional Views on 2030 Agenda Follow up and Review Framework 1

Zero draft paragraphs

Transcription:

Major Groups and Other Stakeholders High Level Political Forum Coordination Mechanism Terms of Reference As amended 6 January 2017 1. Recalling Section C, paragraphs 42 to 55 of the Rio+20 outcome document The Future We Want, explicitly involving major groups and other stakeholders (MGoS) in all matters relating to the UN and Sustainable Development; 2. Further recalling paragraph 84 of the Rio+20 outcome document The Future We Want, which incorporates all practices from the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) into the High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HLPF); 3. And finally recalling UN General Assembly Resolution 67/290 which established the HLPF, particularly referencing paragraphs 8c, 13, 14, 15, 16, 22, and 24 which all mandate MGoS to be actively involved in all activities pertaining to the HLPF at all levels; 4. We MGoS, have therefore decided to establish a coordination mechanism for the HLPF. I. Title 1. The group shall be called the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM. II. Membership 1. Membership of the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM is open to all representatives of the nine Major Groups and other relevant stakeholders active in sustainable development. III. Objectives of the Mechanism 1. Ensure broad, open, transparent and inclusive participation in the HLPF. 2. Ensure that the rights of access and inclusive participation of MGoS in the HLPF are protected 1 and upheld as mandated by 67/290 and potentially expanded. 3. Facilitate the coordination among, and promote the participation of, all stakeholders that are involved in the HLPF process and want to contribute to it, including organizations and groups that are not part of the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM, to ensure the broadest participation possible. 4. Convene an annual forum for MGoS at which an annual review of engagement activities is presented, including recommendations for future action. 1 67/290, op. cit., paragraph 8c, 13, 14, 15, 16, 22, 24

IV. Methods of Work 1. Meetings of the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM will be held on a regular basis as needed. Remote participation will be possible for those unable to attend in person. 2. DESA/DSD will provide technical facilitation for meetings of the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM, as well as maintain the official records of meetings, the list of participants, engagement, and results. 3. DESA/DSD is also expected to share and to bring to the attention of the President of ECOSOC and/or President of the General Assembly relevant information about the work of the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM. V. The Steering Group 1. A STEERING GROUP will be established by the organizing partners of the nine major groups 2 and focal points of the other stakeholders, or their designated representatives, as identified and outlined in the mentioned resolutions. The organizing partners of the major groups and the focal points of other stakeholders shall not represent more than one group/constituency in the Steering Group. 2. The STEERING GROUP will be responsible for facilitating the participation of MGoS at HLPF related activities. 3. The STEERING GROUP will facilitate the work of the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM 3 to prepare for processes related to the mandate of the HLPF, and in line with A/RES/67/290. 4. The STEERING GROUP will be comprised of one principal and one alternate representative of each major group and other stakeholder, defined as follows: a. Major Groups as Identified in Agenda 21: i. Women; ii. Children and Youth; iii. Indigenous Peoples; iv. NGOs; v. Local Authorities; vi. Workers and Trade Unions; vii. Business and Industry; viii. Scientific and Technological Community; ix. Farmers. b. Stakeholders as Mentioned in HLPF Res 67/290: 2 Major groups identified in Agenda 21, op. cit. 3 Check Para 16. Encourages the major groups identified in Agenda 21 and others stakeholders, such as private philanthropic organizations, educational and academic entities, persons with disabilities, volunteer groups and other stakeholders active in areas related to sustainable development, to autonomously establish and maintain effective coordination mechanisms for participation in the high-level political forum and for actions derived from that participation at the global, regional and national levels, in a way that ensures effective, broad and balanced participation by region and by type of organization.

i. Private philanthropic organizations/foundations; ii. Educational and academic entities; iii. Persons with disabilities; iv. Volunteer groups. c. Stakeholders Mentioned in Rio+20 Outcome - The Future We Want: i. Older persons; ii. Local communities; iii. Migrants. d. Other Relevant Stakeholders Active in Sustainable Development: *This is an open category that intends to capture the fully inclusive and transparent nature of this group and the mentioned resolutions. Examples within this category may include global networks whose primary mandate is to work on HLPF related matters, regional groups on a rotational basis, constituencies working on the main theme of HLPF, human rights defenders, environmental groups, etc. Admittance and number of seats under this category will be subject to a joint decision of the existing STEERING GROUP, including demonstrable governance requirements placed on existing members, particularly as outlined in section V.6 below. e. Stakeholder mechanisms for frameworks/processes, not already included in the above listings and that have a mandate formally linked to the HLPF, for example, but not limited to*: i. Financing for Development CSO Group; ii. 10 Year Framework of Programmes for Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns; iii. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. * This is a category that wishes to give voice and include representatives of the organized major groups and other stakeholders from other UN processes and agendas that are also expected to report through the HLPF. Participation in the Steering Group would require a submission of a letter from the stakeholder mechanism and/or the respective secretariat confirming the nomination of focal point and alternate, who have been through the necessary internal consultation and decision-making process. Besides, it is required that the focal point and alternate are from different organizations and constituency. Admittance under this category will be subject to a joint decision of the existing STEERING GROUP, including demonstrable governance requirements placed on existing members, particularly as outlined in V.6 below. 5. The composition of the STEERING GROUP will, as much as possible, ensure regional and gender balance among its members. 6. All members of the STEERING GROUP must have clear governance structures, consultative processes, and meaningful accountability mechanisms towards their membership as per DESA and additional jointly agreed requirements, including how these organising partners and/or focal points are elected, selected, or appointed, as well as provide some type of governance reporting. 7. Members of the STEERING GROUP may produce joint statements and take joint advocacy action in order to facilitate the participation of MGoS at the HLPF.

8. The STEERING GROUP will meet on a regular basis as needed. Remote participation will be possible for those unable to attend in person. 9. The STEERING GROUP will have a rotating co-chair system. The CO-CHAIRS should be composed of 2 representatives: 1 from a major group and 1 from a stakeholder group, rotated on a yearly basis, with the term of the representative from the major group starting 1 February and ending 31 January of the following year and the term of the representative from a stakeholder group starting 1 August and ending 31 July of the following year. The incoming CO-CHAIRS will be elected by members of the STEERING GROUP a month before the respective terms of office. The CO-CHAIRS will be responsible for, among other tasks: a. Proposing meeting agendas, including for the annual review meeting of the full membership of the Coordination Mechanism; b. Reviewing agreements; c. Proposing and following up on actions; d. Preparing notes of the meetings or appointing others to do so; e. Sharing information; f. Facilitating the participation and contribution of all members of the STEERING GROUP. 10. Each STEERING GROUP member has one vote. The STEERING GROUP aims to make decisions based on consensus; however, if consensus cannot be reached, a vote will be conducted. The simple majority of the votes prevails. STEERING GROUP members must attend at least two-thirds of the meetings during a six months period in order to be able to exercise their vote and they must demonstrate engagement. The CO-CHAIRS are expected to keep records of member participation. 11. The STEERING GROUP, or upon suggestion of any member of the Coordination Mechanism submitted to it, may create subcommittees for specific collective tasks, and thematic groups for coordination of substantive ongoing thematic areas with members of the broader COORDINATION MECHANISM. These subcommittees will carry out their work and report back directly to the STEERING GROUP. Subcommittees will operate under the auspices of the STEERING GROUP, which will transmit results and recommendations, once approved, to the COORDINATION MECHANISM. Subcommittees can be disbanded by the STEERING GROUP, as and when appropriate. 12. Minutes of all meetings of the STEERING GROUP will be publicly available. 13. The list of the members of the STEERING GROUP (representatives and alternates) will be publicly available. VI. Objectives of the Steering Group 1. Facilitate multi-stakeholder inputs into the HLPF programme through DESA/DSD and at meetings with the President of ECOSOC. 2. Propose draft programmes for Expert Group Meetings (EGMs) and other related events that address themes relevant to MGoS and their work in the context of sustainable development. 3. Propose draft guidelines and templates for stakeholder role in national and regional reviews of implementation of the 2030 Agenda.

4. Identify key representatives to be funded and/or non-funded speakers, panelists, and moderators at all stakeholder engagement opportunities in the context of the HLPF. An open and transparent call for speaker nominations will be facilitated by DESA/DSD. The STEERING GROUP shall review nominations and select these speakers, panelists, and moderators. Specific criteria for selection will be set by the STEERING GROUP accordingly. Selection processes shall not preclude, unbalance, or compromise the engagement of MGoS, especially those with lower financial capacity. The final selection of speakers and participants will be based upon a balanced approach towards constituency, region, gender, and age, as well as expertise. 5. The STEERING GROUP will act to facilitate the integration of broad and diverse perspectives at the HLPF, setting clear, transparent, and inclusive criteria for engagement. 6. Facilitate dialogue and, whenever possible, identify consensus on core issues regarding the participation of MGoS in the HLPF. 7. Mobilize actions and concrete outputs that will strengthen the overall credibility, visibility, and influence of MGoS in the HLPF. 8. Facilitate the production of position papers on the theme of HLPF meetings as needed. 9. Develop and promote communication and outreach strategies that supports public awareness and increased understanding of the HLPF. 10. Organize meetings of the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM and propose the agenda. 11. Maintain the mailing list of the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM. 12. Consider issues related to fundraising, including administration of a trust fund that may be established. VII. Amendments 1. These Terms of Reference may be amended, as and when necessary, by the STEERING GROUP for approval by the MGoS HLPF COORDINATION MECHANISM. ADOPTED: 6 January 2017 * * * * *