Data Integrity in Clinical Trials the Sponsor Perspective

Similar documents
Use of computerised equipment, software and systems in clinical research

Clinical Trials & Regulatory

etmf A Regulators Perspective Paula Walker, GCP Operations Manager & Senior GCP Inspector

Your Complete Quality Solution Provider for the Life Science Industry

COMPUTER SYSTEMS VALIDATION

Considerations for Using etools in Research: Part 11 and System Validation

SAS Life Science Analytics Framework

Curriculum Vitae Dr. Joachim Schoch-Bösken. jsb-validierung Zwischen den Bächen 9 D Rheinfelden

EU Annex 11 US FDA 211, 820, 11; other guidelines Orlando López 11-MAY-2011

BIOCLINICA CLINICAL DATA MANAGEMENT

5 th Training Workshop for Micro-, Small- and Medium- Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

LEVERAGING YOUR VENDORS TO SUPPORT DATA INTEGRITY:

The European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX IV TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA:

About Trial Online. Trial Online is owned by Replior AB, a Swedish IT Operations provider focused on the Life Science sector.

Cross-walk between EU Annex 11 and US FDA 211, 820, 11; other guidelines and regulations Orlando López Rev19Dec14

Good Clinical Practice (GCP): how does a laboratory that supports a clinical trial ensure compliance with these Regulations

INTRODUCING CLINIC AUTOMATION IN A PHASE I UNIT WITH END-TO-END E-SOURCE DATA PROCESSING

Framework of Regulation /Guidelines

DATA INTEGRITY IN CLINICAL RESEARCH. Singapore Clinical Research Professional (CRP) Forum 25 August 2017

By: Augustine Onyeaghala Clinical Research/Quality Management Systems Consultant Global Health Trial Workshop Lagos,

CDISC Standards: Current and Future

FULL TABLE OF CONTENTS AND CHARTS & GRAPHICS

High Quality or Poor Quality DB

Cross-walk between EU Annex 11 and US FDA 211, 820, 11; other guidelines and regulations Orlando López Rev05MAR15

Data Integrity Compliance Project

APPLICATION OUTSOURCING. for life sciences

Audit Program Background Definition Management Example Content Risk assessment approach

[ WHITE PAPER ] A Basic Overview: Meeting the PIC/S Requirements for a Computerized System INTRODUCTION GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES

Topics summarised in this presentation are: method for defining quality level you want meaning of external controls quality assurance activities

Tufts Veeva 2017 eclinical Landscape Study

Central Monitoring by Data Management Edit checks, logical checks, automatic review of data, trend analyses

Building an etmf on Documentum. Sanofi-Pasteur s experience

Tufts CSDD-Veeva eclinical Study CRO Report

D.I.C.T - Data Integrity in Clinical Trials

EU Annex 11 US FDA , (g), (i), 11 Orlando López 09-APR

CUSTOMER AND SUPPLIER ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR 21 CFR 11 COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT. 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ. (Frequently Asked Questions)

Phlexglobal Whitepaper

etmf From Libraries of Paper to Electronic Filing Cabinets to Databases

Incorporating Risk- Based Monitoring Strategies: Challenges in Implementation Sherri Hubby, Director, U.S. Quality Assurance

Points to Consider When Developing a TMF (Trial Master File) Strategy

Annex IV to guidance for the conduct of good clinical practice inspections sponsor and CRO

Reflection paper on GCP compliance in relation to trial master files (paper and/or electronic) for management, audit and inspection of clinical trials

Constructing an etmf 12/2/2011. consider your current etmf structure!! The do s and don ts of EDM. Disclaimer

11 Hidden Features of electronic Trial Master Files (etmfs) to Optimize the Value of Your etmf

BIOMETRICS SERVICES ADVISORY DATA OFFICE UNBLINDING SECURE INDEPENDENT TEAM PROGRAM. ADaM TRAINER SAFETY SDTM COMPLIANT TA-EXPERTISE SDTM DATA

Cross-walk between EU Annex 11 and US FDA 211, 820, 11; other guidelines and regulations Orlando López Rev11AUG16

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS and DATA INTEGRITY...

Cross-walk between EU Annex 11 and US FDA 211, 820, 11; other guidelines and regulations Orlando López Rev22APR16

Preparing for a Software Quality Audit

Top Challenges with Late Stage Trial Master Files

Computer. Systems Validation. Full Time Part Time Online.

MASTER VALIDATION PLAN PROCEDURE DRAFT DRAFT OF A POSSIBLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS VALIDATION MASTER PLAN PROCEDURE

Achieves International Standards

Ensure Data Integrity Compliance Enterprise-Wide

What you missed at the 3 rd Trial Master File Summit January 28-29, Alexandria, VA.

Audit and Regulatory Inspection Nopanan Yaibuathes Clinical Research and Compliance Manager Roche Thailand Ltd.

DATA INTEGRITY ASSURANCE AS KEY FACTOR FOR SURVIVING CORPORATE AUDITS AND REGULATORY INSECTIONS

Addressing the Paradigm Shift in Regulatory Inspections


The Case for ICH E6(R2) Compliance Assessment

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Corporate Presentation. October 2017

XClinical Software & Services Fast - Flexible - Focused

Good Clinical Practice

Research Study Close-down and Archiving Procedures

St. Luke s University Health Network

Data Integrity Through the Life Cycle Balancing Quality and Innovation. Sion Wyn Conformity +44 (0)

Strategies for Risk Based Validation of Laboratory Systems

Sponsors, CROs and all

Research & Development. J Illingworth and S Moffat. Research, pharmacy and R&D staff

Clinical Data Standards & Automation

EDC, esource, and epro.

New Data Integrity Regulations and Practical Advice for Life Science Laboratories. we prove it.

Standard Operating Procedure. SOP effective: 21 December 2017 Review date: 21 December 2019

Data Integrity Why is it important? DADM Conference - 22 August 2017

It s All About The RISK

Industrialized Clinical Data Standards Management Speed of automation, Power of accuracy and Transforming clinical data into business intelligence

Atlant s atwatch CAPA TM. Corrective and Preventive Action System (CAPA) Product & Services Bundle for

NN DM 1002 NEURONEXT NETWORK STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT SOP: NN DM 1002 Version No: 2.0 Effective Date: 21Oct20

Copyright 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Computerised Systems. Inspection Expectations. Paul Moody, Inspector. 18/10/2013 Slide 1. ISPE GAMP COP Ireland Meeting, Dublin, 17 th October 2013

Competence in Clinical Trials the Regulators Perspective.. (Jennifer Martin Senior GCP Inspector, 9 June 2014)

GCP Basics - refresher

Current Trends in Data Quality and Integrity Issues in Inspections and Risk Based Approach to Investigations; EU perspective

Source Documents Elettronici: Criticità Applicative e approccio alla convalida. Paolo Morelli CEO - Arithmos

Data Integrity in GXPs

GCP INSPECTION FINDINGS Singapore Research Ethics Conference 2018

2015 PDA/FDA Joint Regulatory Conference September 28-30, 2015 Renaissance Washington, DC Downtown Hotel Washington, DC

Inspections: an academic perspective

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 725 CAPACITY, CAPABILITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRIALS HOSTED BY NNUH

FDASmart Inc. EDC & CDM Solutions

TMF Reference Model. Topline results of 2014 TMF Survey #4. August 2014 Fran Ross TMF Survey Sub-team

Implementation and Operation of CDISC ODM-based EDC by UMIN

Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) Management Standard Operating Procedure

COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM VALIDATION

Summary of Significant Changes. Policy

ICH GCP E6 (R2) : What is Oversight and how can we ensure it

Standard Operating Procedure

OCTC 2012 CRO Selection

Transcription:

Data Integrity in Clinical Trials the Sponsor Perspective Maximilian Stroebe, GSK Vaccines Three differences to Commercial Manufacturing Long process chains Source Data, Clinical Sites and Outsourcing Trial specific Clinical sites CROs Programming Database configurations System use 1

Most Critical Processes in Clinical Trials Source Data to Submission Clinical Site Systems > EDC > DM > Stats > RA > Health Authority e.g. ECD, LIMS, EPR Adverse Events to Reporting Systems of First Recording > AE db > Signal Detection > Health Authority e.g. CRM, Call Center Clinical Trial Material to Use Manuf. > QC Labs > Release > IRT > Distribution > Env. Monitoring > Usage > Recovery Risk higher where the raw data is! Risk high for central databases. Extra compliance attention to etmf: needs to contain True Copies, maintaining dynamic nature of data. Few boxes, many web based systems Many processes involve data only (AEs, Source Data) Unlike in manufacturing, the computerized systems are not physical boxes in a company building Many client server systems, often hosted by vendors or providers Processes need to be actively analyzed to find gaps System inventories can mislead 2

Multi system landscape How is data moved from system to system? Metadata? Can I see in the last system who has originally entered the data? Can I trust previous reviews and approvals? Which changes have been performed on the way? Which data has been deleted on the way? Any unprotected systems on the way? E.g. xls files on a Sharepoint? Which is my last system? etmf, Archive System? A true copy may be retained in a different electronic file format to the original record, if required, but must retain the equivalent static/dynamic nature of the original record. [MHRA] Source Data All information in original records and certified copies of original records of clinical findings, observations, or other activities in a clinical trial necessary for the reconstruction and evaluation of the trial. Source data are contained in source documents (original records or certified copies). (CPMP/ICH/135/95) 3

Control Triangle in Clinical Studies Health Authorities: compare Source Data at sites to submitted data Subjects PI: Records Source Data Sponsor: collects, analyzes, and submits Source Data What changes if Source Data is electronic only? No paper at sites to inspect? EMA: Reflection paper on expectations for electronic source data [ ] in clinical trials Scope: 1. Electronic Case Report Forms (e CRFs) 2. Electronic patient data capture devices for epro 3. Instruments supplied to investigators for recording clinical data 4. Instrumentation or electronic [ ] where analysis, tests, scans, imaging, evaluations, etc. are performed in support of clinical trials. 5. Electronic Health Records. 4

EMA: Specific to esource Data: Topic 3: Control The investigator should maintain the original source document or a certified copy. Source data should only be modified with the knowledge or approval of the investigator. The sponsor should not have exclusive control of a source document. Source documents should be protected against unauthorized access. EMA: Electronic Health Record Systems at Clinical Sites Sponsor must assess EHR systems for GCP compliance, e.g. Data used for the study fully attributable Monitor, Auditor, Inspector direct access, but not to non subject data Are copies complete and accurate? 5

Multi organization landscape Sponsor Principal Investigator GP? Hospital? University? Central laboratory Radiology System vendor Hosting provider Outsourced System Admins? Clinical Research Organizations Outsourced Call Centers Is all staff trained on GCP? Are Quality Agreements in place with all parties? Project Character of Clinical Trials Per Trial, different Countries Clinical Sites CROs Computerized Systems (e.g. ediaries) Analytical endpoints/laboratories IMP Logistics 6

Trial specific applications ecrfs SAS Data Standards Interfaces to Outside What to Do? Cultural Change Involve/Train Business Process Owners Involve/Train Procurement Start with high criticality areas Work risk based 7

Risk Based Approach ICH E6 Starting Point: Critical Process and Data Identification Then: Risk Identification, Evaluation, Identification, Control, Communication, Review, Reporting How to identify risks meaningfully Performed by a cross functional team, especially including experts from the business process. Create brainstorm like atmosphere. Helpful questions to structure the discussion: 1.Consider all 5 system components (Hardware, Software, Processes, People, Documentation) 2.Walk along the Data Life Cycle and all Data Flows 3.Which business processes will use a specific computerized system? For complete list, see GAMP GPG on GCP Systems 8

Conclusion Understand the Business Processes and Risks Map the Data Flow, including Outside Which systems are on the data flow? Are all systems on the way validated for the use in question? Work strictly risk based Involve Business and Procurement Keep your source data under control and get it properly into the submissions and etmf Thank you for your Attention!!! Questions are Welcome! 9

Terminology CSV and DI Data Integrity The extent to which all data are complete, consistent and accurate throughout the data lifecycle. [MHRA GxP Data Integrity Definitions and Guidance for Industry] Computerized System Validation Achieving and maintaining compliance with applicable GxP regulations and fitness for intended use by the adoption of principles, approaches, and lifecycle activities within the framework of validation plans and reports, and the application of appropriate operational controls throughout the life of the system. [GAMP] This requires an understanding of the computerised system's function within a process. [MHRA] 10