John Corini - PE. Key To Successful Tower Installations: Under Stack And Over Guy

Similar documents
STAAD.pro 2007 Design of Wind Turbine Foundations

HF Tower Collapse ! We re not the only ones. NSARC HF Operators 1 KFI KRBC-TV

Project ULA 120D Snow-0 Seis-IV

TSE TOWER TRANSMISSION TOWERS AND ELECTRICAL SUBSTATIONS

Office Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari

HIGH RISE CONDO SOHO, NEW YORK, NY

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

Using CSA S37-01 in TOWER and PLS-POLE

John Jay College Expansion Project

Page 1 of 46 Exam 1. Exam 1 Past Exam Problems without Solutions NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: C. Law of Sines:

Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials. Preliminary Exam - Structural Design

Example of a modelling review Roof truss

Level 6 Graduate Diploma in Engineering Structural analysis

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

STANDARDIZED STRUCTURES

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania

1000 CONTINENTAL SQUARE

Belleville Spring. The relation between the load F and the axial deflection y of each disc. Maximum stress induced at the inner edge

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

Arlington, Virginia December 3, 2007 TECHNICAL REPORT III LATERAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND CONFIRMATION DESIGN

Structural Design Engineers 120 Montgomery Street, Suite 1410 San Francisco, California / Fax 415/

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Modjeski and Masters, Inc. Consulting Engineers 04/18/06 St. Croix River Bridge 3D Analysis Report Introduction

twelve rigid frames: compression & buckling ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2019 lecture

School of Engineering and Applied Science Building Miami University, Oxford, OH Technical Assignment 3 December 3, 2007

SIDDHARTH GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS :: PUTTUR Siddharth Nagar, Narayanavanam Road QUESTION BANK (DESCRIPTIVE)

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

Council on Tall Buildings

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FZE. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2015/2016

STEEL REACTION FRAME

Executive Summary Building Description: Introduction... 13

THE SOFTWARE FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF TALL SLENDER STRUCTURES

twenty one Steel Construction 1 and design APPLIED ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS

AISC Live Webinars. Thank you for joining our live webinar today. We will begin shortly. Please standby.

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS NEW WINDOW OPENING IN EXISTING PERIMETER LOAD BEARING WOOD FRAMED WALL Project Address: Job #: 80167

Technical Report 1. Seneca Allegany Casino Hotel Addition. Salamanca, NY

Southwest Housing, Arizona State University

PEER Tall Building Seismic Design Guidelines

Question Paper Code : 11410

8 Design Specification

North Shore at Canton Baltimore, MD Beau Menard Technical Report 1

Types Of Roofs - Vault

CHANGES ON THE WIND MARK MALOUF, P.E. AGL (ABOVE GROUND LEVEL) AUG/SEP 2005 pp

Rosenberger. Rosenberger Site Solutions, LLC. Lightweight Tower Catalog

Jonathan R. Torch Thesis Proposal Columbia University. Thesis Proposal. Columbia University Northwest Science Building

Stress Analysis of Fixed Site Series 6000 Antennas

Florida Structural Engineers

80M 4-Square. An antenna project to obtain a bigger signal on the 80 Meter (3.5 to 3.8 MHz) amateur radio band. Bruce Whitney W8RA

Inelastic Torsional Response of Steel Concentrically Braced Frames

Appendix J Structural Analysis

AIA St. Louis January 4 th, 2017 Phillip Shinn, PE Jacobs Engineering Washington University in St. Louis, Sam Fox School of Design and Visual Arts

REINFORCED ENGINEERING HANDBOOK CLAY AND CONCRETE MASONRY SEVENTH EDITION. John M. Hochwalt, PE, SE KPFF Consulting Engineers

SAMPLE TC6K Elevator Design Summary. Order No PO-47201

8 Design Specification

PRECAST CONCRETE CONNECTIONS - US PRACTICE

CVEN 483. Structural System Overview

THE DESIGN AND INSTALLATION OF A FIVE-STORY NEW TIMBER BUILDING IN JAPAN

30 kip/ft (Dead load) 5 ft. 20 ft

Park Potomac Office Building E

BAS-010 B.TECH. (AEROSPACE ENGINEERING) LC) PROGRAMME (BTAE) BAS-010 : MACHINE DESIGN

Structural Behaviors of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge With A-Shaped Tower Due to Three Wind Speeds

Code No: R Set No. 1

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design November 15, 2004

ST7008 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON WESTERN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE FZE. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER ONE EXAMINATION 2018/2019

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICE EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR

1. BS 5950: Structural use of steelwork in building Part 1: Code of practice for design of simple and continuous construction, BSI, 1990

eight plates and grids APPLIED ACHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2018 lecture STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMS ARCH 631

Nonlinear Analysis and Design of a Guyed Mast: Comparison of Two Design Proposals

CHAPTER 4. 1:6-Scale Frame: Stiffness and Modal Testing 4.1 OVERVIEW

Determination of the main characteristics of semi-rigid beam-to-column connections through numerical and experimental method

Structural Analysis of a New Generation of Guyed Telecom Mast with a Wind Turbine

6. Design of Portal Frames (For class held on 20 th, 26 th and 27 th March 07)

Trailer Stage. Structural design calculations. 2nd September [00]

Traditional vs FEA Based Analysis/Design of Baseplates for Tall Telecommunication & Transmission Poles

15.2 Approximate Analysis of a Continuous Beam for Gravity Load

eight plates and grids Plates, Slabs & Grids Plates, Slabs & Grids Term Project plates horizontal plane, rigid slabs thin, flat, rigid

(a) Pin-Pin P cr = (b) Fixed-Fixed P cr = (d) Fixed-Pin P cr =

Composite Steel/Concrete

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE PIER COLUMNS SUBJECTED TO SEISMIS LOADING

Design of Column Base Plates

NON-LINEAR BEHAVIOR OF STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL WITH LARGE RECTANGULAR OPENING

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1

Conventional Paper II (a) Draw a crank rocker mechanism and identify all instantaneous centers.

QUIZ 2 Allotted Time: 3 hours

Simplified Building Schematic for Typical Floor (Levels 9 through 22):

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

eleven rigid frames: compression & buckling ELEMENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SPRING 2014 lecture

Mechanical behavior and design method of weld-free steel structure with knee brace damper using square tube column

Analysis and Design of Steel

Release Notes for RISA-3D


Response of TBI case study buildings

A Study on Efficient Design of Tall Telecommunication & Transmission Pole Bases

Introduction to Substation Design TADP 542

Stress-Laminated / Steel T-Beam Bridge System

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

CE 591 Fall 2013 Lecture 21: Beam-Column Connections

Transcription:

John Corini - PE Key To Successful Tower Installations: Under Stack And Over Guy Tom Wagner N1MM 1

KE1IH BACKGROUND First Licensed as KA1MDG in 1983 One of The YCCC Smaller Guns Practicing Design/Structure Engineer of 25 years Currently an Aerospace Composite Structures Engineer for Pratt and Whitney Registered Professional Engineer in Mass. Have Design and Stamped Towers in Ma., Ct and NY. 2

A Look At Computer Modeling Amateur Radio Towers - KE1IH Free Standing Tower Topics of Discussion: Wind Loading Calculations Guy Wire Tension Importance of Mast Length Guyed Tower Beam Properties Method Guyed Tower Beam Element method Questions 3

Free Standing Tower Free Body Diagram Loads in Blue, are Known Antenna and Mast Forces Loads in Green need to be determined Wind Load Tower Base Reaction Shear Force Tower Base Reaction Axial Force Tower Base Moment Reaction 4

An Extreme Ham Tower This 70 foot tower was originally to be 100 feet designed to withstand 110 MPH The Tower Steel is over 6 1/2 feet wide at the base Typical Bolted Brace 5

The Concrete Base is 8 6 wide on each side and over 7 feet deep. There is over 18 Yards of Concrete in the base and it weighs over 70,000# ( 35 tons). An Extreme Ham Tower 6

This tower model has 400 nodes and 992 elements Welded Section The deflection at the top to the tower is 28, the deflection at the top of the mast is 48 Bolted Sections 7

Wind Loading Comparison EIA 110 MPH WIND NO ICE EIA 100 MPH WIND NO ICE EIA 82.5 MPH WIND ¼ Radial ICE MASS CODE 90 MPH WIND NO ICE Tower Section MEDIAN HEIGHT Max Pressure Max Force Max Pressure Max Force Max Pressure Max Force Max Pressure Max Force 10 31 973 26 804 17 673 21 588 30 31 804 26 664 17 576 21 476 50 35 550 29 434 20 480 31 430 70 38 535 32 443 22 510 31 380 90 41 421 34 348 24 425 31 280 8

Max Stress 100 Foot Free Standing Tower Results Tower Section Tower Section Element Maximum Tower Leg Load 110 MPH Wind Load NOICE Maximum Tower Leg Stress AISC Maximum Allowable Load or Stress Max Allowable Tower Leg Load Max. Allowable Tower Leg Stress 7N 12 43,977 pounds 29,775 psi 50,685 pounds 34,310 psi 6N 31 46,980 pounds 31,808 psi 50,686 pounds 34,310 psi 5N 62 49,030 pounds 28,962 psi 55,624 pounds 34,150 psi 4N 102 31,270 pounds 25,485 psi 40,389 pounds 32,910 psi 3WN 163 17,029 pounds 24,680 psi 22,423 pounds 32,480 psi Tower Section Element 82.5 MPH Wind Load - 1/4 Radial Ice AISC Maximum Allowable Load or Stress Maximum Tower Leg Load Maximum Tower Leg Stress Tower Section Max. Allowable Tower Leg Stress 7N 12 34,530 pounds 23,378 psi 50,685 pounds 34,310 psi 6N 31 35,950 pounds 24,340 psi 50,686 pounds 34,310 psi 5N 62 37,390 pounds 22,086 psi 55,624 pounds 34,150 psi 4N 102 22,780 pounds 18,566 psi 40,389 pounds 32,910 psi 3WN 163 11,430 pounds 16,565 psi 22,423 pounds 32,480 psi 9

Guyed Tower Free Body Diagram Loads in Blue, are Known Loads in Red are unknown Loads in Green need to be determined Antenna and Mast Forces Upper Guy Wire Reaction Force Wind Load Lower Guy Wire Reaction Force Tower Base Reaction Shear Force Tower Base Reaction Axial Force 10

Tower Section Nodal Loadings Wind Force Applied to Nodes Intersection of Tower Tubes and Braces 11

EIA-222-F Wind Loads Wind Loading ASCE/EIA RS-222 90 Total height of Tower and Mast 90 V = Wind Speed in MPH - ASCE Exposure B 0.166667 Mast Width 1.169881 G = Wind Gust Factor - Exposure B - ASCE 0.211649 Af = Tower section area perpindulcar to wind - Ft^2 - per foot 2.539792 0.850694 At = Total tower section area 10.20833 0.248796 e = ratio of tower free area to total tower area 0.248796 2.441117 cf - Wind force coeficient - ASCE 0.601569 r - coeficient for round members F= qz*af*l*coef*g qz - Velocity Pressure Wind force Coef Height Kz - Pounds/Ft^2 F - Wind Force - pounds Wind Force per tower section node L 10 7.5 0.654872 15.88632 10 1.4685 108.9367 6.05 20 25 0.923741 22.40872 10 1.4685 153.6626 8.54 30 35 1.016954 24.66994 10 1.4685 169.1683 9.40 40 45 1.092661 26.50649 10 1.4685 181.7621 10.10 50 55 1.157139 28.07063 10 1.4685 192.4878 10.69 60 65 1.213708 29.44293 10 1.4685 201.898 11.22 70 75 1.26436 30.67168 10 1.4685 210.3239 11.68 80 85 1.310393 31.78837 10 1.4685 217.9814 12.11 85 85 1.310393 31.78837 14 1.2 104.1281 Mast Wind Force 7.44 Antenna wind forces 12

Antenna Drag Force Calculations Calculation of Drag Forces of Antenna Boom Drag Force Cd 1.2 = Drag Force Coefficient A 24.8. 2 = Boom Length X Boom Diameter - Sqare Feet 12 ρ.0763 Density of Air at 60 deg F v 100. 5280 v 146.667 60 2 = g 32.2 Acceleration due to Gaverity Boom Drag Force = Df Cd. A. ρ. v 2 2g. Df = 126.411 pounds Stagnaton Pressure - 100 mph = Sp Df A Sp = 30.583 13

Antenna Wind Loading Cont. D1 R10 Dr D10 D15 D1010 14

Antenna Drag Force Calculations Continued TH6DXX CW LOW D1 95.5 12. 1.25 2. 35.5 12 12. 1.13. 41.5 2 12 12. 7. 2 D1 = 2.467 16. 12 R10 55 12. 7. 23.5 2 8. 12 12. 5. 36.5 2 8. 12 12. 7. 2 16. 12 R10 = 1.094 Dr 48.5 12. 1.25 2. 39.5 12 12. 1.13. 32.5 2 12 12. 7. 6 2 16. 12 12. 1. 2 12 Dr = 1.743 D10 53 12. 7. 45.5 2 8. 12 12. 7. 2 D10 = 0.921 16. 12 D15 55 12. 7. 23.5 2 8. 12 12. 5. 48.5 2 8. 12 12. 7. 2 16. 12 D15 = 1.167 D1010 D1020 48. 12 2. 1.25 29 12 12. 1.13. 72.5 2 12 12. 7. 2 16. 12 At D1020 D15 D10 Dr R10 D1 At = 9.121 D1020 = 1.729 8.09 square feet per hy-gain Antenna Drag Force Based Upon the Elmenets = Dfe At. Sp Dfe = 278.947 15

Importance of Pretension in Guy Wires N12 N13 E11 E12 N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 E1 N6 N7 N8 N9 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 Beam-Column Condition Simple - Simple Supports Fixed - Free Supports Fixed - Fixed Supports Fixed - Hinged Supports Guyed Column - Ks = 0 Guyed Column - Ks = 1 Guyed Column - Ks = 10 Guyed Column - Ks = 100 Guyed Column - Ks = 1,000 Guyed Column - Ks = 10,000 Guyed Column - Ks = 100,000 Guyed Column - Ks = 1,000,000 Guyed Column - Ks = 10,000,000 Exact Solution NISA Solution % Difference NISA - Exact 7903.90 7,904.02 1.000015 1975.97 1,975.98 1.000005 31,615.6 31,622.3 1.00021 16,166.4 16,170.3 1.00024 1,975.96 1,976.0 1.000010 2,460.30 2,460.33 1.000012 6,587.10 6,587.2 1.0000076 15,612.0 15,613.0 1.000060 16,125.0 16,126.1 1.000066 16,164.9 16,166.0 1.000066 16,168.8 16,169.9 1.000066 16,170.3 1.000066 16,169.2 16,170.3 1.000066 Beam-Column Condition NISA Solution Fixed - Free Supports 1976.03 Guyed Column - Ks = 1,975.98 0 Guyed Column - Ks = 2,028.74 1 Guyed Column - Ks = 2,499.66 10 Guyed Column - Ks = 6,762.03 100 Guyed Column - Ks = 21,132.5 1,000 Guyed Column - Ks = 39,157.0 10,000 Guyed Column - Ks = 40,789.8 100,000 Guyed Column - Ks = 40,923.7 1,000,000 Guyed Column - Ks = 40,936.9 10,000,000 Guyed Column - Simple 40,938.3 Supports at Guy Locations Guyed Column - Fixed 126,488. Supports at Guy Locations N10 N11 E10 Guy Wire Stiffness verses Buckling Load - Single Guy Guy Wire Stiffness verses Buckling Load - 2 Guys This Information Was Published By the CSME in 1997 Minimum Practical Guy Wire Stiffness 16

Importance of Pretension in Guy Wires Continued Stiffnes Stiffness of of 1/4" ¼ EHS EHS Guy Guy Wire Wire P 400 Preload - pounds E 29000000 Modulas of Elasticity of Steel - pounds/square insches d.08 Diameter of Wires in Guy Wire - in A 7 d2.. π A = 0.035 Cross Sectional Area of Guy Wire - in 4 L 95. 12 Length of Longest Guy - in δ PL. AE. δ = 0.447 K P δ K = 895.078 17

Importance of Pretension in Guy Wires Continued Using The Same Methodology: The Stiffness of 3/16 Guy Wires: 537 #/in or a Decrease of ~ 360 #/in The Stiffness of 5/16 Guy Wires: 1512 #/in or an Increase of ~ 610 #/in 18

Importance of Mast Length F1 F2 L1 F1 = Wind Force of Antenna 1 F1 = Wind Force of Antenna 2 L1 = Distance Between Antenna 1 and 2 = 10' L2 = Distance Between Antenna 1 and Tower Thrust Bearing = 2' L3 = Distance Between the Tower Thrust Bearing and the Antenna Rotor = 8' R1 L3 L2 R2 Mast Length Overall Mast Length = 20' F1 200 F2 200 L1 10 L2 2 L3 8 R1 ( F2.( L2 L3) ( F1.( L1 L2 L3) L3 R2 ( R1 ( F1 F2) ) R2 = 151 R1 = 551 R1 = The Force at the Thrust Bearing R2 = The Force at the Rotor 19

Importance of Mast Length Using The Same Methodology: For a 16 Mast With 6 in the Tower: Radial Load At The Thrust Bearing, R1 = 900#, an Increase of 350# Radial Load At The Rotator, R2 = 500#, an increase of 350# For a 14 Mast With 4 in the Tower: Radial Load At The Thrust Bearing, R1 = 1600#, an Increase of 1050# Radial Load At The Rotator, R2 = 1200#, an increase of 1050# Conclusion: Longer Length of Mast in The Tower a Major Benefit 20

Tower modeled using 3D beams with equivalent Rohn 25 properties Computer Model of Rohn 25 Tower Beam Method Results: Max Tower Moment = 2800 ft/# Allowable Moment = 6720 ft/# Margin of Safety = 2800/6720 =.42 Max Mast Moment = 28800 in/# Mast Bending Stress = Mmax/S =84,850 #/in^2 Guy Wires Modeled as Compression Only Elements Max Guy Wire Force= 430# Max Deflection (mast) = 30.3 21

Tower Deflection FEM Results 2.5 Tower Deflections vs. Tower Height 20 foot mast- loose guys, fixed at base 2 20 foot mast 2 guys 20 foot mast- tight guys, fixed at base 1.5 Tower Deflections - in 1 0.5 20-free 16-free 14-free 20-fixed 20-2_guys 20-lose 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 14 foot mast, free at base -0.5 20 foot mast-free at base Tower Height - ft 16 foot mast-free at base 22

Tower Bending Moments 3000 2500 Bending Moment - ft-poun 2000 1500 1000 80 Tower Fixed at Base Free to Rotate at Base 80 Tower 2 Guys 20-free 20-fixed 20-2-guys 500 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Tower Height - ft 23

80 Rohn 25 at KE1IH QTH 24

NASTRAN FEM MODEL of TOWER and ANTENAS 40-2CD 40 meter beam TH6DXX Rohn 25 Tower Tower has 590 Elements and 226 Nodes Guy Anchors fixed in all directions Tower Base fixed in all directions case 1 Tower Base free to rotate case 2 25

Tower Model Details Rotor & Bearing Plates Modeled as Rigid Regions Tower Tubes and Mast Modeled as 3D Beam Tower Braces Modeled as 3D Beams Guy Wires Modeled as Rods, with Springs as Anchors 26

Tower Wind Load Distribution Max Wind Load 12 pounds per node 100 MPH Wind Speed 27

Tower Deflections Due To Wind Max Deflection at Mast = 61 Max Tower Deflection = 12 28

Tower Deflections Second TH6DXX Max Tower Deflection = 12 Second TH6DXX Location 29

Tower Bending Stress Due to Wind Max Stress is 69,800 psi in Mast 30

Bending Stress at Tower Top Max Mast Stress Un-deformed tower 10,400 psi stress in tower due to mast bending 31

Tower Base Bending Stress Single TH6DXX Max Tower Bending Stress is at the Base = 11,800 psi Base Fixed 32

Tower Base Bending Stress 2 TH6DXX Max Tower Bending Stress is at the Base = 11,800 psi Base Fixed 33

Tower Axial Stress 34

Tower Base Stress- Single TH6DXX Max Tower Axial Stress is at the Base = 23,200 psi Max allowable stress per AISC = 23,400 Base Fixed 35

Tower Base Stress- Single TH6DXX 2 Guys Max Tower Axial Stress is at the Base = 27,500 psi Max allowable stress per AISC = 23,400 Base Fixed 36

Tower Base Stress- 2 TH6DXX Max Tower Axial Stress is at the Base = 17,800 psi Rigid Region used to Model Pier and Plate Base Free to Rotate Pier Pin 37

Tower Base Axial Stress 2 TH6DXX Max Tower Axial Stress is at the Base = 27,500 psi Max allowable stress per AISC = 23,400 Base Fixed 38

Tower Axial Stress at Tower Top Max Axial Stress 23,000 psi Due to mast and bearing plate 39

Antenna and Mast Rotations Due to Torque 24,000 in-pound Torque applied to mast 40

Tower Base Stress Due to Self Weight 41

Summary of Tower Base Axial Stress 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 Axial Stress Allowable 5,000 0 Fixed 2 Fixed 2 Free 2 Guys 42

Contact Information KE1IH KE1IH@ARRL.net This Presentation is available at: http://www.yccc.org/articles/articles.htm 43