Technical Bulletin 132. Diffused Air Mixing Requirement. by:

Similar documents
Technical Bulletin 110. Membrane Life Expectancy. by:

Technical Bulletin 169. Design of Diffused Aeration System. by:

Outline. Introduction Case Studies. Anoxic Zone Mixing Channel Mixing. Theory and Criteria. Mixing Theory Design Criteria.

Technical Bulletin 166. Partial Mix Lagoon. Retrievable. Environmental Dynamics Dyna. by:

Jet Aeration Systems

An Efficient Aeration Strategy Sits on a Three-Legged Stool

Energy Efficiency Modifications. Small Blowers D.O. Control and VFD s. Joe Cantwell Focus on Energy Kris August Kiel Wastewater Utility

Assuming 100 gallons per capita per day, and 3 people per REU, design flows for the development are proposed to be:

Air Lift Pumps (Grit Pump) ST-027

Palmer Wastewater Treatment Plant Environmental Impacts. A summary of the impacts of this treatment alternative are listed below:

VARI-CANT Jet Aeration Systems. Water Technologies

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM

Solids Management for Today s Wastewater Systems

AERATION BLOWERS THEY ARE NOT ALL EQUAL Ken Brischke MWH 1801 California Street, Suite 2900, Denver CO, 80202

Energy Optimization for WWTPs Saving Green by Going Green

Advances in Aeration Control. MWEA Fall Process Seminar November 6, :15 AM East Lansing, MI Thomas E. Jenkins President JenTech Inc.

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved.

Aeration Blower Requirements. Tom Jenkins 06/15/2016

The ABC s (and 123 s) of Treating High Strength Wastewater

Optimizing Mixing Requirements for Moving- Bed Biofilm Processes

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

Technical Bulletin 138. Structural Analysis of Membrane Element for Tube, Disc, and Panel Diffusers. by:

Wastewater Treatment Plant Energy Reduction With High Efficiency Aerators

Energy Reduction and Nutrient Removal in WWTPs Using Feed- Forward Process Control

DESIGN OF HIGH STRENGTH WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS FOR FOOD SERVICE FACILITIES. By Allison Blodig 1

Alliance Power, Inc. Power Usage in the Aeration Basin

CHAPTER 10 PRELIMINARY TREATMENT

GE Energy. Roots * Wastewater Aeration Controls

Aeration System Improvements with a 5-Year Payback. Scott Phipps

Effluent Conveyance. Paul Trotta, P.E., Ph.D. Justin Ramsey, P.E. Chad Cooper

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

West County Treatment Plant Noise and Odor Control Project Update. June 29, 2004

Aeration Systems Past, Present and Future. What to Expect from Aeration System Upgrades

PERFORMANCE OF FLOATING HORIZONTAL AERATORS IN AERATED LAGOONS AND OXIDATION DITCHES

CLR Process. Vertical Loop Configuration

ECO-ANT21 Process ECO-ANT21 Corporation

Aeration University Advanced Concepts in Energy Efficiency

- 1 - Retrofitting IFAS Systems In Existing Activated Sludge Plants. by Glenn Thesing

Optimization of an Aeration System at an Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant

SECTION 8.0 NEWPCC SECOND PRIORITY CONTROL ALTERNATIVES

2/22/2011. Presentation Outline. Overview of Wastewater Aeration. Basic Equation. Some Acronyms. dc dt. dc dt TDS BP T C L

Calculating Aeration Flow and Pressure Requirements

Screening, Definition: The unit involved is called a screen.

The following biological nutrient removal processes were evaluated in detail in the 2016 Liquid Processing Facilities Plan:

Wastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis

The waste water industry relies purely on performance

Sanitary and Environmental Engineering I (4 th Year Civil)

A SIMPLE SOLUTION TO BIG SNAIL PROBLEMS - A CASE STUDY AT VSFCD S RYDER STREET WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Lycoming County Water and Sewer Authority WWTP Mechanical Thickened Aerobic Digester Case Study

11001 Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor

ADVENT INTEGRAL SYSTEM

Wastewater Treatment - Energy Saving Opportunity

PERMIT TO OPERATE SILVER CLOUD CT., MONTEREY, CA TELEPHONE (831) FAX (831)

/ Marley MARPAK Modular Biomedia /

WWTF Capacity Assessment Project

Client: City of Pontiac Project Name: Regional WWTP Feasibility Location: Pontiac, MI Project Number: Issue Date: October 23, 2006

HOW TO SELECT THE MOST EFFECTIVE BLOWER TECHNOLOGY FOR WASTEWATER APPLICATIONS

Fremont Water Pollution Control Center Plant Expansion for Nutrient Removal and Wet Weather Flow Treatment

Bioprocess Intelligent Operating System -Beyond Ammonia Control-

Norwalk, CT Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) CSO Capacity and Treatment Evaluation. Subject: Task 3 Existing Grit Removal System Assessment

Treatment Strategies and Improvements at the Blackhawk WWTP Alex Kuzovkov, P.E.

City of Elk River Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements. Achieving Wastewater Treatment Goals

COMPARISON OF PROCESS ALTERNATIVES FOR ENHANCED NUTRIENT REMOVAL: PERSPECTIVES ON ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS

Reduce Grid Required Energy to Utilize Your Wastewater Treatment Facility

Aeration Basics the Bug s Eye View

AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL

ETE Flowers WWTP A case study Mapal Green Energy Ltd Andy Carling UK Sales Manager

LAKESIDE Water Purification Since Bulletin #1218 Revised June Spiravac Clarifier. Peripheral Feed Center Takeoff Suction Sludge Removal

AERATION EFFICIENCY FOR A LEACHATE TREATMENT PLANT

LEMNA BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PROCESS LEMTEC TM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

MEMBRANE AERATED BIOFILM REACTOR

Biological Treatment of Wastewater

The Superior Jet Aeration System

The Jet Aerator from Flygt. For improved wastewater treatment

Energy Efficiency / Conservation Case Studies in Waste Water Treatment Facilities

Energy Efficiency Projects for Aeration Systems:

Aeration Products FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

Liquid Stream Fundamentals: Diffusers

Surface Aeration System Modeling Using COMSOL

Figure Trickling Filter

EVALUATION OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY USING A ROTATING LOW-ENERGY NON-BLOWER AERATOR

CHAPTER 12 TRICKLING FILTER PLANTS

EDI Commitment to Quality

Module 17: The Activated Sludge Process - Part III Answer Key

Ditches for Energy Efficiency and Improved Nitrogen Removal

Brightwater: The Design Challenges of a 39 mgd (150 MLD) Membrane Bioreactor

TIDEFLEX MULTIPORT MIXING SYTEMS Four High-Performance Mixing Systems

Start and Finish Dates: You will have 90 days from this date in order to complete this course

Evaluation of Energy Conservation Measures. for Wastewater Treatment Facilities

Evaluation Of Aeration Control

Environmental Dynamics International

Field and CFD Analysis of Jet Aeration and Mixing

APPENDIX A. 1. Background. 1.1 Existing Facilities. Page 1

Winery FAST & Floating FAST

Chapter 11. Secondary Clarifiers

Omnipac Field-Erected SBR Package Plants. jet tech sbr technology

than 2.1 lb per ft 3 or 33 lb per module (2 ft x 2 ft x 4 ft bundle of fastened sheets).

Transcription:

Technical Bulletin 132 Diffused Air Mixing Requirement by: Environmental Dynamics International Published: 6/2005

DISCLAIMER Technical Bulletins are presented as a service by Environmental Dynamics International headquartered in Columbia, Missouri USA. For additional more information regarding this particular bulletin or your specific aeration application contact Environmental Dynamics International by calling +1.573.474.9456, toll free at +1.877.EDI.AIR8 (877.334-2478), or via email at techbulletins@wastewater.com. 1

TECHNICAL BULLETIN REQUIREMENTS 132 DIFFUSED AIR MIXING Considerable confusion exists about the ability of diffused aeration systems to mix basins for various treatment processes. In particular, it seems the use of 20-30 cfm/1000 cf of reactor volume is a common criterion without many people realizing how the numbers were derived. For diffused aeration systems, this criterion can create a very unrealistic mixing requirement unless the fundamental criteria are understoodd and properly applied. Some examples will demonstrate the problems associated with universally applying cfm of air/1000 cf. Ten State Standards for aerobic digester requirements suggest 30 cfm/1000 cf. A key point is the Ten State Standards are guidelines that will ensure proper function in almost any design, and is not always the most optimized solution. The application of these criteria is subject to engineering and analysis interpretation. EDI has been very successful in getting consideration at regulatory agencies for "rational" mixing design criteria. Let us consider a two basin geometries and the airflow requirements of each: 1. Basin Dimensions = 10ft x 10ft x 10ft (Length x Width x Depth) a. Volume = 1000 cubic feet b. Mixing Airflow per 30scfm/1000ft 3 = 30 scfm of air c. Mixing Airflow = 0..3 scfm/ft 2 of floor area d. Energy requirements = 1.0 BHp 1 2. Basin Dimensions = 10ft x 10ft x 20ft (Length x Width x Depth) a. Volume = 2000 cubic feet b. Mixing Airflow per 30scfm/1000ft 3 = 60 scfm of air c. Mixing Airflow = 0..6 scfm/ft 2 of floor area d. Energy Requirements = 4.0 BHp The energy requirement to mix the 20 ft deep basin has increased by a factor of almost 4 while the tank volume and air volume was only increased by a factor of 2. As the basin gets deeper, this criterion becomes even more unrealistic due to spatial constraints across the tank floor. 1 Based on rule of thumb efficiencies for rotary positive blowers. 2

The criterion of cfm/1000ft 3 has a history that must be recognized before it is applied. This criterion was developed assuming: 1. Water depth of 8 to 10 ft deep was normally associated with the early package plants in this industry. 2. The diffusers were coarse bubble diffusers. 3. The diffusers were arrayed along one side of the tank only. 4. Diffusers 2 ft off the floor. Using the above assumptions the 30 cfm/1000 cf was a value that worked well for these package plant units. Broad application of this criterion without reference to depth of tank, type of diffuser, or diffuser location is not appropriate. To utilize this same criterion for all mixing applications does not optimize the design and power requirements of the plant. By comparison, surface or mechanical aeration systems are based on approximately 1.0 Hp/1000 cf reactor volume which is a directly proportional factor rather than a squared factor. In many cases, this is the analysis used to justify energy savings for mechanical mixing devices versus diffused air by using deep tanks and an apparent savings based on criteria only. An example of the type of mixing energy EDI would expect to be required for any aeration system is given in the ASCE and WPCF MOP for wastewater treatment plant design. For fine bubble diffusers applied in a grid or floor cover configuration, they indicate 0.12 cfm of air would be required per square foot of floor in activated sludge reactor (Requirements of 0.05 to 0.12 cfm/ft 2 are suggested by the EPA Fine Pore Aeration Manual. Using this value, you can see our 10 ft x 10 ft reactor would have only 12 cfm of air total required for mixing regardless of how deep the basin. The value of 0.12 cfm/ft 2 is also developed for a given set of conditions. 1. Fine bubble diffusers. 2. Full floor cover application. 3. Typical biological activated sludge system. EDI suggests the cfm/ft 2 is the proper design basis for diffused aeration systems. In applying this cfm/ft 2 the following items must be recognized: 1. What type of diffuser is employed? 2. The density and geometry of the diffuser application. 3. What type of material is being pumped, i.e., is the installation in an aeration basin, aerobic digester, sludge holding, etc.? 3

EDI recommends supplying a maximum flow rate based on scfm per 1000 cubic feet of basin volume to provide a completely mixed environment at peak conditions. It is proposed that the average design condition and recommended operating condition be based upon a basiss of scfm per square foot. As a result, EDI would suggest typical mixing values for fine bubble diffusers would be in the general criteria outlined below: 1. Design Conditions a. Aeration basin with primary treatment = 0.12 scfm/ft 2. b. Aeration basins w/o primary treatment = 0.15 scfm/ft 2. c. Aerobic digesters with less than 3% sludge concentration = 0.25 scfm/ft. d. Aerobic digester with greater than 3% sludge concentration = 0.3 scfm/ /ft 2. 2. Peak Conditions a. Aeration basin with primary treatment = 15 scfm/1000ft 3. b. Aeration basins w/o primary treatment = 20 scfm/1000ft 3. c. Aerobic digesters with less than 3% sludge concentration = 30 scfm/1000ft. d. Aerobic digester with greater than 3% sludge concentration = 45 scfm/1000ft. It is recognized these above values are general guidelines and each design must be evaluated independently. Using the above values as guidelines allows a realistic and rational design basis to be developed for mixing any reactor. Using this scfm of air/ft 2 allows a directly proportional energy level to be used in design regardless of basin depth. This is both realistic and rational because any evaluation of diffuser mixing can demonstrate that vertical mixing is easily achieved, i.e., the bubble will always go up regardless of how deep it is released. Horizontal mixing is much more difficult and requires the same scfm regardless of water depth; therefore, the scfm/ft 2 of floor is a rational design basis. Coarse bubble diffusers will tend to require slightly more air per square foot of reactor than fine bubble diffusers. This higher air volume is required because the surface area of the bubbles is less, as a result, there is less pumpage of liquid per scfm of air applied. Coarse bubble diffusers create greater turbulence but not as much pumpage per unit of air volume applied. See Technical Bulletin 105 for discussion of mixing capabilities of coarse bubble versus fine bubble. 4