Standards for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment

Similar documents
Metal Scaffolds. (1) Metal scaffolds shall be designed to support all dead, live, and wind loads to which they will be subjected.

INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRY OF METALLIC FORMWORK SYSTEMS

WOOD I-JOIST AWARENESS GUIDE

DEPAUL UNIVERSITY. Scaffolding Program. Environmental Health & Safety. April 2017

FrameFast Shoring System

1. Cast-in-place concrete is specified in Section

SECTION COLD-FORMED METAL TRUSSES

Safety Documents > Safety Manual > Scaffolds

User Manual: 1.8m Heavy-Duty Frame. pafili.com.au

Anchor bolts ASTM F1554, Gr. 36 Wide flange beams ASTM A992, Fy = 50 ksi Misc. structural steel ASTM A36, Fy = 36 ksi

DIVISION 03 CONCRETE SPECIFICATION : FORMS AND FORMWORK

SECTION PRE-ENGINEERED COLD-FORMED METAL ROOF AND FLOOR TRUSSES

Shoring and Reshoring Fundamentals

MODEL SPECIFICATIONS: Hydraulically Driven Steel Underpinning Pile Specifications

Statement of Special Inspections Michigan Building Code 2012 (MBC 2012)

SECTION PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR

Design, Testing and Utilization of Welded-Wire Rack Decking

Interior Hangers. Application

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES

Specifying Pre-Engineered CFS Floor and Roof Trusses 551f-98

Universal Panels & Accessories

STATE UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION FUND. UNIVERSITY CON DIRECTIVE 5-1 Issue date: October 2014

A. Provide all wood trusses as indicated on the drawings or as required to do a complete job.

Table of Contents Big expertise. Real convenience. Concrete commitment.

REINFORCED CONCRETE MASONRY SECTION

TCC/SHORE TRANSIT BUS MAINTENANCE FACILITY - PHASE II

STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMING

UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR METAL PLASTER BASES (LATH) PREFACE

SECTION WOOD FRAMING. A. Includes But Not Limited To 1. Furnish and install wood framing and blocking as described in Contract Documents.

SECTION NON-STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING

Nortrax Section David Manchester Road, Ottawa NON-STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING 16 May 2014 Page 1

Polycrete Big Block Standard Specification

SECTION (formerly 05425) PRE-ENGINEERED, PRE-FABRICATED COLD-FORMED STEEL ROOF & FLOOR TRUSSES

PRESENTATION PLAN A MODEL COMPARISON FLOOR CONSTRUCTION

AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD. Door & Access Systems Manufacturers Association, International ANSI/DASMA

Supported Scaffold Inspections

A. Product Data: For each type of cold-formed steel framing product and accessory.

C. Delegated-Design Submittal: For metal-plate-connected wood trusses indicated to comply with

SECTION STEEL JOIST FRAMING

Installation and Maintenance Manual for EMH Freestanding Workstation Jib Cranes

OSHA Rules for Scaffolding

SECTION VIBRATION CONTROLS FOR PLUMBING PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

DECK PERMIT APPLICATION

***************************************************************************************************************

SECTION VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

SECTION COLD-FORMED METAL FRAMING

research report Cold-Formed Steel Walls with Fiberboard Sheathing Shear Wall Testing RESEARCH REPORT RP REVISION 2006

SECTION WOOD FRAMING. A. Includes But Not Limited To: 1. Furnish and install wood framing and blocking as described in Contract Documents.

PRODUCTION SPECIFICATIONS INSULATED CONCRETE FORMS

PRODUCTION SPECIFICATIONS INSULATED CONCRETE FORMS

RB WEIR GATES MODEL GENERAL DESCRIPTION DESIGN CONSTRUCTION

SECTION VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

ENGINEERING INFORMATION

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: SENTINEL FENCE AND RAIL. For: 120 in by 42 in Fully-Welded Aluminum Guardrail Assembly with Intermediate Support Post

Home Depot Page 1 of 5 HDPB Humacao, PR 10/19/09

OUR COMPANY OUR WARRANTY OUR GUARANTEE

TILT-UP PRECAST CONCRETE SANDWICH PANELS. A. Work includes, but is not limited to, the following:

SECTION TILT-UP PRECAST CONCRETE SANDWICH PANELS. A. Work includes, but is not limited to, the following:

Temporary Structures. Form Materials and Accessories ATCE--II. Advanced Topics in Civil Engineering Form Materials and Accessories ATCE-II

Lamit Industries, Inc. 710 Marion Road Columbus, Ohio P-(614) F-(614)

SECTION CONCRETE FORMWORK

APPLICATION GUIDE PERFORM WITH PRECISION

WALL CANTILEVER WORK STATION JIB CRANE

CITY OF MOUNT DORA LIFT STATION CHAINLINK FENCE AND GATE SPECIFICATIONS

SECTION COLD-FORMED METAL FRAMING

SECTION ORNAMENTAL ALUMINUM RAILING

SECTION A. ACSE 7 Minimum Loads for Buildings and other Structures.

SECTION STRUCTURAL METAL FRAMING

SECTION A. ACSE 7 Minimum Loads for Buildings and other Structures.

STANDARD PRACTICE INSTRUCTION

FIGURE R502.2 FLOOR CONSTRUCTION

Smarter. Safer. Leaner.

Project Address: Name of Person Completing Form:

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY PROJECT NAME JOB # ISSUED: 03/29/2017

RB 133 RIM BOARD PRODUCT STANDARD. Version 2.3

Rapid Axial Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

SECTION METAL PLATE CONNECTED WOOD TRUSSES PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 RELATED DOCUMENTS

Minimum Guidelines for the Design and Use of Underpins When Performing Foundation Stabilization and/or Supplementation UP-08

DIVISION 5 METALS SECTION METAL DECKING

Typical Deck Details. Albemarle County, Virginia. Based on the 2012 Virginia Residential Code

Superior Aluminum Guide Specification 10/4/2016 Non-Welded Aluminum Pipe Railing

GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS CURA ADJUSTABLE REROOF FRAMING SYSTEMS SECTION REROOFING ADJUSTABLE FRAMING SYSTEM

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICE EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR

SECTION HANDRAILS AND RAILINGS. A. Section Cast-In-Place Concrete; coordination with substrate.

K. ASTM F436- Standard Specification for Hardened Steel Washers; 2011.

References. EM , Sections 22 OSHA 29CFR (Subpart L ) UFGS [Latest] ANSI A

Typical Deck Details. Shenandoah County, Virginia. Based on the 2012 Virginia Residential Code

SECTION VIBRATION AND SEISMIC CONTROLS FOR ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS

Typical Deck. CONSTRUCTION TIP SHEET 5 Basic Decks w/ 60 lb Live Loading

SECTION MECHANICALLY ASSISTED MOBILE STORAGE SHELVING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

Elevated Slab Sequence

SECTION VIBRATION CONTROLS FOR HVAC PIPING AND EQUIPMENT

research report The Strength of Stiffened CFS Floor Joist Assemblies with Offset Loading RESEARCH REPORT RP REVISION 2006

SECTION 552 HELICAL ANCHORS AND HELICAL PILES

P: F: Resi-Ply FORMING SYSTEM BY DAYTON SUPERIOR

Shore X. Higher Capacity And Unique Extension Frames Can Cut Costs. Shore X. Heavy Duty Shoring

PREFABRICATED STEEL TRUSS SPECIFICATIONS

OPERATING PROCEDURES

Transcription:

ANSI/SSFI SH300-2007 American National Standard Standards for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute, Inc. Sponsor: Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute, Inc. 1300 Sumner Ave Cleveland, Ohio 44115-2851

ANSI/SSFI SH300-2007 SCAFFOLDING, SHORING & FORMING INSTITUTE Standards for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment Sponsor Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute, Inc. i

Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute A Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute (SSFI) standard or recommended procedure is intended as a guide to aid the manufacturer, the consumer, and the general public. The existence of an SSFI standard or recommended procedure does not in any respect preclude anyone, whether he has approved the standard or recommended procedure or not, from manufacturing, marketing, purchasing or using products, processes, or procedures not conforming to the standard or recommended procedure. Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute standards and recommended procedures are subject to periodic review and users are cautioned to obtain the latest editions. NOTICE: Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute standards and procedures may be revised or withdrawn at any time. The procedures of the SSFI require that action be taken to reaffirm, revise, or withdraw standards and recommended procedures no later than five years from the date of publication. Purchasers of Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute standards and procedures may receive current information on all documents by calling or writing the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute. Sponsored and published by: SCAFFOLDING, SHORING & FORMING INSTITUTE 1300 Sumner Avenue Cleveland, OH 44115-2851 Ph: 216/241-7333 Fax: 216/241-0105 E-Mail: ssfi@taol.com URL: www.ssfi.org Copyright 2001 by Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Suggestions for improvement of this standard will be welcome. They should be sent to the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute, Inc. Printed in the United States of America ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 2. Scope... 1 3. Definition of Terms... 1 4. General Test Requirements... 3 5. Test Methods... 4 Appendix A Vertical Shoring Assembly Test Report Form... 8 Appendix B Horizontal Shoring Assembly Test Report Form... 9 Appendix C Truss Assembly for Vertical Shoring Test Report Form... 10 Appendix D Horizontal Shoring Beams and Assemblies Test Report Form... 11 Appendix E Truss Assembly for Vertical Shoring Test Report Form... 12 Appendix F Column or Wall Mounted Shoring Bracket Test Report Form... 13 iii

Foreword (This foreword is included for information only and is not part of ANSI/SSFI SH300 Standard for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment.) This standard was developed by the Shoring Section of the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute, Inc. as an assistance and guide to the manufacturers, purchasers, and users of shoring. It provides methods for testing and rating shoring equipment. The methods in this standard are intended to provide a means of comparison only. Due to the wide variety of situation specific factors involved in the use of shoring, it is not possible to develop a method that will apply to all possible situations while still providing useful information upon which comparisons can be made. The ratings derived from the methods in this standard apply to the specific conditions contained in the test procedures. The ratings are not intended to represent actual use conditions, but, rather, they are intended to provide a reference point at which a comparison can be made. Users, purchasers, specifiers, and other interested parties should contact the manufacturer for ratings of specific configurations. SSFI recognizes the need to periodically review and update this standard. Suggestions for improvement should be forwarded to the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute, Inc., 1300 Sumner Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, 44115-2851. All constructive suggestions for expansion and revision of this standard are welcome. The existence of a Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute (SSFI) standard or recommended procedure does not in any respect preclude any member or non-member from manufacturing or selling products not conforming to the standard or recommended procedure and the SSFI is not responsible for the use of the standard or recommended procedure. iv

ANSI/SSFI SH300-2007 Standards for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment 1. Introduction This standard contains procedures for testing and rating shoring components and assemblies. These procedures are intended to be used as a guide for industry testing practice and are not intended to supersede procedures set forth in any applicable Federal, State, or local regulations. The Institute believes that adherence to these procedures will yield reliable test results. It takes no responsibility for such results. The methods in this standard are intended to provide a means of comparison only. Due to the wide variety of situation specific factors involved in the use of shoring, it is not possible to develop a method that will apply to all possible situations while still providing useful information upon which comparisons can be made. The ratings derived from the methods in this standard apply to the specific conditions contained in the test procedures. The ratings are not intended to represent actual use conditions, but, rather, they are intended to provide a reference point at which a comparison can be made. Users, purchasers, specifiers, and other interested parties should contact the manufacturer for ratings of specific configurations. Normal shop safety practice and, when applicable, safety precautions described by OSHA or other regulatory agencies should be observed during the administration of these tests. 2. Scope This standard provides methods for testing and rating the following: 3. Definition of Terms Vertical shoring posts, assemblies, and components Horizontal shoring beams and assemblies Truss assemblies used with horizontal shoring Column or wall mounted shoring 3.1 ACCESSORIES Those items other than frames, braces, or post shores used to facilitate the construction of shoring. 3.2 ADJUSTMENT SCREW or SCREW JACK* A leveling device or jack composed of a threaded screw and an adjusting handle used for the vertical adjustment of the shoring. 3.3 ALLOWABLE LOAD or RATED LOAD * The ultimate load divided by a factor of safety. 3.4 BASE PLATE - A device used to distribute the vertical load. 3.5 COUPLING PIN An insert device used to connect and align lifts or tiers vertically. 3.6 CROSS BRACING A system of members that connect frames or panels of shoring laterally to make a tower or continuous structure. 3.7 DEAD LOAD - The weight of forms, stringers, joists, reinforcing rods and the actual concrete to be placed. 3.8 EXTENSION DEVICE Any device, other than an adjustment screw, used to obtain vertical adjustment of shoring equipment. 3.9 FACTOR OF SAFETY The ratio of ultimate load to the allowable load. 3.10 FORMWORK The material used to give the required shape and support of poured concrete, consisting primarily of: (1) Sheathing Material which is in direct contact with the concrete such as wood, plywood, metal sheet or plastic sheet (2) Joists Members that directly support sheathing. * These terms may be used synonymously 1

(3) Stringers or ledgers Members that directly support the joists, usually wood or metal load-bearing members. 3.11 FLYING FORM Large mechanically handled section of formwork, which may include supporting trusses, beams or frame units. 3.12 FRAME OR PANEL * - A principal prefabricated, welded structural unit used as a component of a tower. 3.13 HORIZONTAL SHORING Load-carrying beams, adjustable or nonadjustable, or fabricated trussed sections used to carry a shoring load from one bearing point, column, frame, post, or wall to another. 3.14 INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY An organization or company which is not affiliated with a shoring manufacturer and which conducts tests of shoring assemblies and components. An Independent Testing Laboratory must be designated as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL), or must be accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), or must be accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). 3.15 JOISTS See Formwork. 3.16 LEG Vertical load bearing component of a shoring frame 3.17 LIFTS OR TIERS * The number of frames erected one above the other in a vertical direction. 3.18 LIVE LOAD The total weight of workers, equipment, buggies, vibrators, and other loads that will exist and move about on the shoring equipment. 3.19 LOAD BEARING MEMBER Any component of a shoring system that is directly subjected to a load. 3.20 LOAD MEDIA Units of known weight, such as steel beams or concrete blocks 3.21 NET DEFLECTION The measured deflection at a specific location from the unloaded condition to the loaded condition minus initial camber or required shimming. 3.22 POST See Leg* 3.23 POST SHORE or POLE SHORES * - Individual vertical member used to support loads. (1) Solid Sawn Timber Post Shores Individual wooden timbers used with an adjustment device and not normally manufactured as a complete unit. (2) Fabricated Single Post Shores Single, manufactured post, with a fine adjustment screw or device in combination with a pin and hole arrangement or clamp for gross adjustments. 3.24 QUALIFIED ENGINEER An engineer who, by possession of a recognized degree, certificate, or professional standing, and who by extensive knowledge, training, and experience, has successfully demonstrated the ability to solve or resolve problems relating to shoring, shoring assemblies, and shoring components. 3.25 RATED LOAD See Allowable Load* 3.26 RE-SHORING A system used during the construction operation in which the original shores are removed and replaced in a sequence planned to support partially cured concrete. 3.27 SAFE LEG LOAD The load that can safely be directly imposed on a frame leg. (See Allowable Load ). 3.28 SCREW JACK See Adjustment Screw 3.29 SHOCK LOAD Impact of material such as concrete as it is released or dumped during placement. 3.30 SHORE HEADS Flat or formed metal pieces that are placed and centered on vertical members. * These terms may be used synonymously 2

3.31 SHORING LAYOUT A design drawing prepared prior to erection showing arrangement of shoring equipment. 3.32 SILL OR MUD SILL * A member (typically wood) that distributes the vertical loads to the ground or slab below. 3.33 SPAN The horizontal distance between supports. 3.34 STRINGERS OR LEDGERS * See Formwork 3.35 TESTING APPARATUS OR FIXTURE A special purpose device fabricated for the express purpose of testing shoring equipment. 3.36 TESTING MACHINE A machine of a type usually found in universities, colleges, and testing laboratories which imposes a controllable load on the shoring equipment. 3.37 TIMBER STRESSES Stress-grade lumber conforming to recommended tables in National Design Specifications for Wood Construction, by National Lumber Manufacturers Association, Washington, D.C. 3.38 TOWER A composite structure of frames or independent legs, braces and accessories. 3.39 TRUSS A structure composed of top and bottom horizontal members (chords), connected by web members, so as to constitute a rigid framework. 3.40 ULTIMATE LOAD The maximum load that may be placed on a component or assembly before its failure to support any additional load. 4. General Test Requirements 4.1 Calibration of Testing Devices 4.1.1 Devices used to determine applied loads shall be calibrated and certified by a reputable testing laboratory during the preceding 12 month period. 4.1.2 Testing machines used for compression testing shall be calibrated in accordance with ASTM E4-99 Standard Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines or latest revision during the preceding 12 month period. 4.1.3 Testing machines used for calibration in Part 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 above, shall be calibrated in accordance with ASTM E74-95 Standard Practice for Calibration of Force-Measuring Instruments for Verifying the Force Indication of Testing Machines or latest revision during the preceding 12 month period. 4.2 Test Specimens: Specimens to be tested shall be selected at random and shall exhibit approximately the same variations in measurements as would be expected from random sampling, including mill tolerances on thickness of various members. 4.3 Sample Size: For each individual loading condition, the minimum number of tests shall be carried out on each piece of equipment or accessory as follows: for metal equipment or accessories, a minimum of three tests shall be performed; for wooden equipment or accessories, a minimum of ten tests shall be performed; for equipment made of other homogenous, non-wood materials, follow the requirements and procedures for metal equipment. 4.4 Average of Test Results: The average of the valid test set shall be used to determine ratings as stated in 4.5. The valid test set shall comprise the following: 4.4.1 For metal equipment and accessories, if three successive tests result in a maximum variation between the average of the three tests and each individual test result of 10%, the three tests shall be the valid test set. 4.4.2 For metal equipment and accessories, if three successive tests result in a maximum variation between the average of the three tests and each individual test greater than 10% but less than or equal to 15%, conduct a fourth test. If the four successive tests result in a maximum variation between the average of the four tests and each individual test result of 15%, the four tests shall be the valid test set. * These terms may be used synonymously 3

4.4.3 For metal equipment and accessories, four tests out of a set of 5 tests as follows: 4.4.3.1 Conduct four tests. If the maximum variation between the average of the four tests and three individual test results is 15%, with variation between the fourth individual test and the average being greater than 15%, a fifth test shall be performed. 4.4.3.2 Determine the average of the three test results identified in 4.4.3.1 (those within the maximum 15% variation) and the fifth test. If the maximum variation between this average and each individual test result is 15%, the three tests identified in 4.4.3.1 and the fifth test shall be the valid test set. 4.4.3.3 If the maximum variation between the average determined in 4.4.3.2 and any individual test result is greater than 15%, another complete set of four tests shall be run and all nine tests shall be considered the valid test set. 4.4.4 For wood equipment and accessories, ten successive tests if the maximum variation between the average of the ten tests and each individual test result is 30%. 4.4.5 For wood equipment and accessories, 20 tests if the maximum variation between the average of the first ten successive tests and each individual test result is greater than 30%. 4.5 Determination of Rating: The average obtained as specified in 4.4 shall be divided by the appropriate factor of safety to determine ratings. 4.6 Published Ratings: All published ratings and load charts prepared by utilizing this standard shall reference this standard and, where applicable, shall clearly indicate the type of test conducted to determine the ratings. 4.7 Measurements: Thickness measurements, when required, shall be made with a suitable micrometer. All other dimensions shall be made with a commercially obtainable measuring tape. All dimensions shall be reported to the nearest 1/16 inch. 4.8 Certification of Tests: All tests shall be witnessed by a qualified engineer or independent testing laboratory that shall be designated as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL), shall be accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA), or shall be accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). The qualified engineer or a representative of the independent testing laboratory shall certify that the tests were performed in accordance with applicable provisions of this standard and that recorded results are factual. 5. Test Methods 5.1 Methods for Testing and Rating Vertical Shoring Posts, Assemblies, and Components 5.1.1 Scope: This procedure addresses the compression testing of vertical shoring posts and assemblies, and components. 5.1.2 Test Setup: The shoring assembly to be tested shall be erected in such a manner as to simulate expected conditions and aligned vertically so that it is not out of plumb more than 1/8 in three feet, but this maximum deviation in the completed structure shall not exceed the diameter or minimum outside width of the vertical member. No greater attempts should be made to adjust the components concentrically than would be expected in actual use. 5.1.3 Loads: 5.1.3.1 The load shall be applied directly to the load bearing member or members by use of load transfer beams, or cross head of testing machine, or directly by hydraulic jacks in an appropriate testing apparatus or fixture. 5.1.3.2 The shoring assembly shall be subject to increasing loads until the ultimate load is reached. 5.1.3.3 The rate of loading on the shoring assembly shall not be less than 5,000 lbs. per minute nor more than 10,000 lbs. per minute. The load shall be recorded at load intervals not to exceed 25% of anticipated ultimate load. The load shall be held at the reading interval until the reading has stabilized for a period of one minute. 5.1.3.4 The rate of loading on post shores and extension devices shall not be greater than 1,000 lbs. per minute. Load readings shall be recorded at load intervals not to exceed 25% of anticipated ultimate load. The load shall be held at the reading interval until the reading has stabilized for a period of one minute. 5.1.3.5 The rate of loading in each test shall remain constant. 4

5.1.4 A Series Tests (Towers): Vertical shoring leg load tests shall consist of towers composed of four (4) vertical legs with manufacturer s normal recommended bracing, base plates, and/or adjustment screws. When adjustment screws are being used they shall be extended 12 inches on the top and 12 inches on the bottom. The test specimen shall not be laterally restrained. All four load bearing legs shall be subjected to simultaneous loading until the ultimate load is reached by the weakest leg. Tests performed according to this method are A series tests. 5.1.5 B Series Tests (Post Shores): Post shores shall be tested individually. Shores may be tested using one of two procedures: 1) At minimum and maximum heights and at every foot throughout the operating range or 2) At minimum and maximum heights. Operating loads for heights between the minimum heights will be determined using a straight line graph between the operating loads at the minimum and maximum heights. The shores may be tested in either a braced or unbraced condition with the individual test data displayed as a graph or chart showing allowable load versus overall height, with the method of bracing, if any, clearly indicated. Loading shall be continued until ultimate load is reached. Tests performed according to this method are B series tests. 5.1.6 C Series Tests (Extension Devices): Extension devices shall be positioned in or upon legs of the shoring tower and tested in the configuration outlined in paragraph 5.1.4. The extension device may be tested extended from the top, bottom or both ends of the legs. Extension devices may be tested using one of two procedures: 1) At minimum and maximum heights and at every foot throughout the operating range or 2) At minimum and maximum heights. Operating loads for heights between the minimum and maximum heights will be determined using a straight line graph between the operating loads at the minimum and maximum heights. The extension devices may be tested in either a braced or unbraced condition with the individual test data displayed as a graph or chart showing allowable load versus overall height, with the method of bracing, if any, clearly indicated. Loading shall be continued until ultimate load is reached. Tests performed according to this method are C series tests. 5.1.7 D Series Tests (Components): Shoring Component Testing Except for standard shapes and beams of homogeneous materials with established physical chemical properties and constant cross-section, e.g., AISC, all proprietary load-bearing individual shoring components shall be tested independently in a configuration for which they were designed to be used to obtain their ultimate load capacity. When components are supported by other shoring members, a test fixture of design similar to these supporting members shall be used to support the components being tested to assure that the test load can be transferred to the adjacent members. All components, including horizontal bearing components, shall be tested to ultimate load. Tests performed according to this method are D series tests. 5.1.8 Test results shall be reported on SSFI Vertical Shoring Assembly Test Report Form for Towers (Series A) (See Appendix A), SSFI Vertical Shoring Assembly Test Report Form for Post Shores (Series B) or Extension Devices (Series C) (See Appendix B),or SSFI Vertical Shoring Assembly Test Report Form for Components (Series D) (See Appendix C) including drawing of test setup, failure mode, ultimate total test load, ultimate leg load or component test load as applicable, type of test, rating determined through testing, certification, laboratory report of tested materials, number of tiers, and screwjack extension. 5.2 Methods for Testing and Rating Horizontal Shoring Beams and Assemblies 5.2.1 Scope: This procedure addresses the compression testing of horizontal shoring beams and assemblies. 5.2.2 Test Setup: Horizontal shoring beams shall be tested in pairs or individually, at the discretion of a qualified testing engineer, to obtain their ultimate load. The test fixture shall permit placement of the shores to simulate expected conditions and the load application device shall simulate uniform loading as close as practical. The test specimens shall not be laterally restrained except when lateral bracing is specified by the manufacturer. 5.2.3 Loads: 5.2.3.1 The load shall be applied directly to the load bearing member or members by use of load transfer beams, cross head of testing machine, or directly by hydraulic jacks in an appropriate testing apparatus or fixture. 5.2.3.2 The shoring assembly shall be subject to increasing loads until the ultimate load is reached. 5.2.3.3 The rate of loading on horizontal shoring assemblies shall not be less than 1,000 lbs. per minute. The load shall be recorded at load intervals in increments not to exceed 25% of the anticipated ultimate load. The load shall be held at the reading interval until the reading has stabilized for a period of one minute. 5.2.3.4 The rate of loading in each test shall remain constant. 5

5.2.4 Adjustable Horizontal Shoring Beam Tests: Adjustable Horizontal Shoring Beams shall be tested at maximum and minimum extensions and at the middle of the adjustment range. The net deflection at midpoint shall be recorded at every load interval. Test the beam to ultimate load and record. It is recommended that load values be recorded for net midpoint deflection of 0.25 inches and L/360. 5.2.5 Fixed Length Horizontal Shoring Beam Tests: Fixed Length Horizontal Shoring Beams shall be tested in accordance with 5.1.7. 5.2.6 Test results shall be reported on the SSFI Horizontal Shoring Beams and Assemblies Test Report Form (See Appendix D) including drawing of test setup, failure mode, ultimate total test load, deflection, rating determined through testing, certification, and laboratory report of tested materials. 5.3 Methods for Testing and Rating Truss Assemblies for Vertical Shoring 5.3.1 Scope: This procedure addresses the testing of truss assemblies used for vertical shoring. 5.3.2 Test Setup: The truss assembly shall be erected according to the manufacturer s recommended procedure and in such a manner as to simulate expected conditions. The truss assembly shall be aligned vertically so that it is out of plumb no more than 1/8 inch in 3 feet, but this maximum deviation in the completed structure shall not exceed the diameter or minimum outside width of the vertical member. No greater attempt should be made to adjust the components concentrically than would be expected in actual use. 5.3.3 Loads 5.3.3.1 The load shall be applied as uniformly as practical to the truss assembly using a testing machine or by application of load media. 5.3.3.2 The truss assembly shall be subject to increasing loads until the ultimate load is reached. 5.3.3.3 The rate of loading, when using a testing machine, shall not be less than 5,000 lbs. per minute nor greater than 10,000 lbs. per minute. The load shall be recorded at load intervals not to exceed 25% of the anticipated ultimate load. The load shall be held at the reading level until the reading has stabilized for a period of one minute. 5.3.3.4 If using load media, the media shall be applied in layers, with each new layer starting in the center and working towards the ends in both directions. 5.3.3.5 The rate of loading in each test shall remain constant. 5.3.4 Test Procedure 5.3.4.1 Truss assembly load tests shall consist of two trusses erected with manufacturer s recommended crossbracing, extension legs and screw jacks at maximum extension recommended by manufacturer. Joists spanning the trusses shall be spaced and secured to the top chord of the trusses, per manufacturer s recommendation. A plywood surface may be mounted to the joists. 5.3.4.2 Uniformly apply load to the truss assembly until the ultimate load of the truss assembly is reached. 5.3.5 Test results shall be reported on the SSFI Truss Assembly for Vertical Shoring Test Report Form (See Appendix E) including drawing of test setup, failure mode, ultimate total test load, rating determined through testing, certification, and laboratory report of tested materials 5.4 Methods for Testing and Rating Column or Wall Mounted Shoring Brackets 5.4.1 Scope: This procedure addresses load testing procedures for column or wall mounted shoring brackets. 5.4.2 Test Apparatus: Column or wall mounted shoring brackets shall be tested on a test fixture designed to allow the application of a vertical load on the horizontal surface of the brackets in a configuration for which they are designed to be used. 5.4.3 Loads 5.4.3.1 A vertical load shall be applied to the horizontal bearing surface of the column or wall mounted shoring bracket.. 6

5.4.3.2 The rate of loading shall not be less than 1,000 lbs. per minute. The load shall be recorded at load intervals in increments not to exceed 25% of the anticipated ultimate load. The load shall be held at the reading interval until the reading has stabilized for a period of one minute. 5.4.3.3 The rate of loading in each test shall remain constant. 5.4.4 Procedure of Test 5.4.4.1 Fasten the column or wall mounted shoring bracket to the test fixture according the manufacturer s recommendation. Prepare detailed illustration(s) of the test configuration. Record the identity of the illustrations on the test report. 5.4.4.2 Record in the test report the method in which the shoring bracket is fastened to the test fixture. 5.4.4.3 Begin loading the bracket. Continue to apply load on the shoring bracket until load refusal occurs. 5.4.4.4 Determine the load on the shoring bracket at the time of load refusal. Record that value in the test report. 5.4.5 Report of Test Results: Test results shall be reported on the SSFI Column or Wall Mounted Shoring Bracket Test Report Form (See Appendix F) Specify the mode of failure, ultimate load, allowable load rating determined through testing, and certification. 7

Appendix A Vertical Shoring Assembly Test Report Form for Towers (Series A) Manufacturer: Model #/Product ID: # of Tiers: Test Date: Test #: Test Location: Factor of Safety (FS): Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 (if needed) Test 5(if needed) Average Ultimate Load Series A Readings Leg 1 Load Leg 2 Load Leg 3 Load Leg 4 Load Series A Rating Total Ultimate Load Failure Mode (Use Notes if needed) Tests 1-3 Tests 1-4 (if needed) 4 Out of 5 Tests (if needed) Maximum Variation % for Test # % for Test # % for Test # Allowable Leg Load Rating (Avg / FS) Sketch: Attach Sketch of Test Set-up and Failure Mode Notes: Witnesses Name Company Signature Title Certification I certify that I am a qualified engineer or a representative of an independent testing laboratory as defined in the SH300 standard. I also certify that the above described tests were performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Methods for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment, as published by the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute in the SSFI SH300 standard, and that the stated results and values are accurate. (Name) (Signature) (Company) (Date) (Address/city/state/zip) (Phone) (e-mail) 8

Manufacturer: Appendix B Vertical Shoring Assembly Test Report Form for Post Shores (Series B) or Extension Devices (Series C) Model #/Product Identification: Test Date: Test #: Test Location: Factor of Safety (FS): Series B or C Readings The following tests are performed with Post Shore or Extension BRACED UNBRACED (check one). Minimum Extension Min. plus1 Min. plus 2 Min. plus 3 Min. plus 4 Min. plus 5 Min. plus 6 Maximum Extension Failure Mode Use Notes if needed Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 (if needed) Test 5 (if needed) Alternate testing method for tests 2 thru 5: In addition to loads at the minimum and maximum also note the first height of extension at which column buckling failure is the failure mode. Minimum Extension Load at Col. Buckling Ht. Maximum Extension Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 (if needed) Test 5 (if needed) Series B or C Rating Tests 1-3 Tests 1-4 (if needed) 4 out of 5 tests (if needed) Average Ultimate Load Maximum Variation Allowable Load Rating (Avg. Ult. Ld. / FS) Sketch: Attach Sketch Notes: Witnesses Name Company Signature Title Certification I certify that I am a qualified engineer or a representative of an independent testing laboratory as defined in the SH300 Standard. I also certify that the above described tests were performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Methods for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment, as published by the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute in the SSFI SH300 Standard, and that the stated results and values are accurate. (Name) (Signature) (Company) (Date) (Address/city/state/zip) (Phone) (e-mail) 9

Appendix C Vertical Shoring Assembly Test Report Form for Components (Series D) Manufacturer: Model #/Product ID: Test Date: Test #: Test Location: Factor of Safety (FS): Series D Readings Ultimate Load Failure Mode (Use Notes if needed) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 (if needed) Test 5(if needed) Series D Rating Tests 1-3 Tests 1-4 (if needed) 4 Out of 5 Tests (if needed) Average Ultimate Load Maximum Variation % for Test # % for Test # % for Test # Rating (Avg / FS) Sketch: Attach Sketch of Test Set-up and Failure Mode Notes: Witnesses Name Company Signature Title Certification I certify that I am a qualified engineer or a representative of an independent testing laboratory as defined in the SH300 standard. I also certify that the above described tests were performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Methods for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment, as published by the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute in the SSFI SH300 standard, and that the stated results and values are accurate. (Name) (Signature) (Company) (Date) (Address/city/state/zip) (Phone) (e-mail) 10

Appendix D Horizontal Shoring Beams and Assemblies Test Report Form Manufacturer: Model #/Product ID: Fixed or Adjustable: Test Date: Test #: Test Location: Factor of Safety (FS): Max. Extension or Fixed Length Readings Min. Extension Middle of Adj. Range Failure Mode (Use Notes if needed) Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 (if needed) Test 5(if needed) Rating Tests 1-3 Tests 1-4 (if needed) 4 Out of 5 Tests (if needed) Average Ultimate Load Maximum Variation % for Test # % for Test # % for Test # Rating (Avg / FS) Sketch: Attach Sketch of Test Set-up and Failure Mode Notes: Witnesses Name Company Signature Title Certification I certify that I am a qualified engineer or a representative of an independent testing laboratory as defined in the SH300 standard. I also certify that the above described tests were performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Methods for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment, as published by the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute in the SSFI SH300 standard, and that the stated results and values are accurate. (Name) (Signature) (Company) (Date) (Address/city/state/zip) (Phone) (e-mail) 11

Appendix E Truss Assembly for Vertical Shoring Test Report Form Scaffold Manufacturer: Model #/Product Identification: Test Date: Test #: Factor of Safety (FS): Test Location: Readings How Is Load Applied (media or machine?): Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 (if needed) Test 5 (if needed) Ultimate Load Failure Mode Average Ultimate Load Rating Tests 1-3 Tests 1-4 (if needed) 4 Out of 5 Tests (if needed) Maximum Variation % for Test # % for Test # % for Test # Rating (Avg / FS) Sketch: Attach Sketch of Test Set-up and Failure Mode Notes: Witnesses Name Company Signature Title Certification I certify that I am a qualified engineer or a representative of an independent testing laboratory as defined in the SH300 standard. I also certify that the above described tests were performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Methods for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment, as published by the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute in the SSFI SH300 standard, and that the stated results and values are accurate. (Name) (Signature) (Company) (Date) (Address/city/state/zip) (Phone) (e-mail) 12

Appendix F Column or Wall Mounted Shoring Bracket Test Report Form Ultimate Load Readings Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 (if needed) Test 5 (if needed) Failure Mode Average Ultimate Load Rating Tests 1-3 Tests 1-4 (if needed) 4 Out of 5 Tests (if needed) Maximum Variation % for Test # % for Test # % for Test # Rating (Avg / FS) Sketch: Attach Sketch of Test Set-up and Failure Mode Notes: Witnesses Name Company Signature Title Certification I certify that I am a qualified engineer or a representative of an independent testing laboratory as defined in the SH300 standard. I also certify that the above described tests were performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Methods for Testing and Rating Shoring Equipment, as published by the Scaffolding, Shoring & Forming Institute in the SSFI SH300 standard, and that the stated results and values are accurate. (Name) (Signature) (Company) (Date) (Address/city/state/zip) (Phone) (e-mail) 13