CTA Blue Line Forest Park Branch Feasibility/Vision Study Village of Forest Park Board of Directors. Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Similar documents
Slide 1: CTA Blue Line Forest Park Branch Feasibility/Vision Study

CTA Blue Line Forest Park Branch Feasibility/Vision Study: Transit Ridership Forecasting Analysis Technical Memorandum Submitted By

SYSTEM-WIDE RAIL CAPACITY STUDY

Construction Project Briefing. March 9, 2016

Chicago Transit Authority Orange Line Alternatives Analysis Study

Section IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 7. Implementation Plan

Red and Purple Modernization Phase One Project Redevelopment Project Area Transit Tax Increment Financing. Public Meeting. September 13, 2016

Alternatives Identification and Evaluation

Red and Purple Modernization (RPM)

Construction Project Briefing. May 9, 2018

I-290 Eisenhower Expressway

Construction Project Briefing. November 19, 2014

CTA Capital Construction Update August 8, 2007

Corridor Advisory Group and Task Force Meeting #2

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses

Section IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 7. Implementation Plan

RPM Phase One: Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization

Construction Project Briefing. June 14, 2017

Construction Project Briefing

Tier 1 EIS Round 2 Local Officials Briefing Fall 2011

Appendix W Energy Technical Memorandum DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Business Advisory Committee. June 17, 2015

Table of Contents. YRT/Viva at a Glance 17 Our Commitment 18

Construction Project Briefing. November 16, 2016

3 Documentation of Alternatives

Construction Project Briefing

Construction Project Briefing. November 14, 2012

Welcome and thank you for spending time with us today to talk about the 75 th Street Corridor Improvement Project.

Green Line COLLEGE AVENUE TO MYSTIC VALLEY PARKWAY. November 20, 2017 Public Information Meeting

Construction Project Briefing. December 9, 2009

This letter is intended for inclusion in the Public Record

2004 FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE

Priorities are for AG comment at today's meeting. Four time frames proposed for implementation

Construction Project Briefing. July 11, 2018

WELCOME EAST LINK OVERLAKE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

Chapter 4. Recommendations

Resources: Industrial Corridors. 20 Chicago Sustainable Industries

Ann Arbor Station Environmental Review. Public Information Meetings April 2, 2014

Construction Project Briefing. October 10, 2018

Ashland. Environmental Assessment Bus Rapid Transit. November Prepared for: The Federal Transit Administration 79th. Prepared by.

Green Line extension Project Fall 2009

Construction Project Briefing. September 11, 2013

CHAPTER 2 DESIGN REFINEMENTS

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 275

Region of Waterloo Stage 1 Light Rail Transit Project. Definitions, Acronyms, Cited References Article 1 Definitions.

Construction Project Briefing. November 9, 2011

I-290 Construction Approach. April 2016

EMU: BN/UP ALTERNATIVE ARVADA RIDGE STATION OPTION A

Executive Summary and Staff Recommendation

August 30, Public Meeting #1

Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Draft Environmental Impact Report

4.0 Coordination and Consultation 4.0 Coordination and Consultation

RECOMMENDATION. (b) that the Shift Communications Plan, attached hereto as Appendix B, BE RECEIVED;

Construction Project Briefing. September 9, 2015

Construction Project Briefing. August 8, 2012

High-Speed Rail - Chicago to St. Louis Alton Regional Multimodal Transportation Center Project

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Metro Blue Line Improvements & Project Update

PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION

King of Prussia Rail Project Frequently Asked Questions - Archive Version: Summer 2018

Construction Project Briefing. January 16, 2015

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

Overview of Alternatives Analysis

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service in Downtown Los Angeles

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Construction Project Briefing. April 13, 2012

2.0 ALTERNATIVES. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 No Build Alternative

Rail Freight and Passenger

Federal Way Transit Center to Tacoma Dome Light Rail

S-09: Auburn Station Access Improvements

Federal Transit Administration Region V. Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)

Moving the first state forward! Delaware s Statewide Long- Range Transportation Plan November 17, 2010 WILMAPCO Our Town

Exposition Light Rail Transit Project

Appendix S10 - Airport Business Zone Structure Plan

Millennium Line Broadway Extension Project. Cost Report

Environmental Impact Statement for the Green Line to the Airport Project. ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

Service Development. Committee of the Whole April 3, 2019 Adam Harrington, Director of Service Development 1

Stakeholder Consultation Outcomes

LAKE + FOREST CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE

APPENDIX H- ALTERNATIVES PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED

Cook County Long Range Transportation Plan MULTIMODAL ANALYSIS SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS

Transportation Facility Inventory

Construction Project Briefing. April 20, 2015

LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT

Executive Summary October 2017

Harlem Avenue Interchange Design Discussion. August 24, 2015

Consequences of Sprawl

Federal Transit Administration s New Starts Process. Red Line Extension Alternatives Analysis Study

Construction Project Briefing. December 14, 2016

Bow Concord I-93 Improvements City of Concord Transportation Policy Advisory Committee

Will County Freight Advisory Council Meeting. April 11, 2017

Transit Service Guidelines

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 216

CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS

Appendix C Presentation Slides with Script

Mankato Transit Development Plan Executive Summary Report. June 2018

WELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017

RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPC ON TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSIT, DATED 2017 MAY 17:

Saskatoon BRT A Catalyst for City Building

Transcription:

CTA Blue Line Forest Park Branch Feasibility/Vision Study Village of Forest Park Board of Directors Tuesday, October 13, 2015 1

Purpose & Study Process Purpose of the study The 55-year old Forest Park Branch is beyond its useful life Evaluate existing conditions and infrastructure options Evaluate markets and service options Conduct outreach to project stakeholders Identify policy and funding options Coordinate planning with IDOT for I-290 corridor Forest Park Open House, Fall 2015 2

Study Area Study Area Boundary 3

Summary of Existing Conditions Assessment Minimal upgrades have been completed as needed Special Trackwork: crossovers & switches recently upgraded (except Lathrop) Signals: recently upgraded Remaining elements beyond useful life and severely worn Track: contaminated ballast, deteriorated ties, poor drainage, worn rail Stations: over 50 years old, only 4 of 12 are accessible, narrow platforms Structures: approaching end of useful life Traction Power: substation, cabling, third rail, etc require upgrading Communications System: warrants technical improvements Maintenance Shop: approaching end of useful life; inadequate track configuration and capacity 4

Overall Recommendations Complete reconstruction/modernization for the Forest Park branch Maintain existing entrance locations Improve customer experience Improve infrastructure Improve terminal site Maintain existing service Work with IDOT on corridor improvements 5

Maintain Existing Entrance Locations Retain double and triple entry station entrances Harlem, Oak Park, Austin, Illinois Medical District, Racine, UIC-Halsted Dual headhouses possible for single entry stations with bus connections Cicero, Pulaski, Western 6

Forest Park Terminal Station - Background Terminal Station for Blue Line Forest Park Branch Station rebuilt in 1982 with ADA access Terminal serves Pace Buses #301, #303, #305, #308, #310, #317, #318, #320 and #757 (no CTA routes) 1,051 available Park and Ride spaces, 650 spaces on CTA property (397 in main lot, 200 in overflow lot near cemetery, and 53 south of I290 bridge) 401 on Village of Forest Park property Weekday ridership ~3,800 entries/day Over 1/3 of weekday riders transfer from bus (37%, March/April 2013) Annual 2014 ridership consistent (+0.1%) with 2013 at 1,157,040 entries 7

Forest Park Terminal Station - Background Pace Bus Daily Boardings and Alightings, January-March 2013. 82 percent of Pace Blueline ridership occurs at the Forest Park terminal, where nine of the 12 Pace routes that serve the Blue Line terminate. 8

Forest Park Terminal Station Pace Bus Routes Forest Park Terminal 9

Forest Park Terminal Station - Background Forest Park Branch Ridership, Annual Average 2014 Forest Park Blue Line Station Average Weekday Average Staturday Average Sunday Annual Entries Market Share Clinton 3,748 1,539 1,394 1,116,639 11% UIC-Halsted 5,836 2,215 1,579 1,695,108 17% Racine 2,474 1,346 979 757,731 8% Illinois Medical District 3,703 1,230 856 1,057,932 11% Western 1,737 1,176 912 556,858 6% Kedzie-Homan 2,353 1,552 1,235 752,306 8% Pulaski 1,946 1,509 1,259 647,672 7% Cicero 1,492 1,042 796 480,685 5% Austin 2,107 1,065 796 638,728 7% Oak Park 1,882 809 591 556,353 6% Harlem 1,179 693 528 367,351 4% Forest Park 3,803 1,968 1,466 1,157,040 12% Blue Line - Forest Park Total 32,260 16,144 12,391 9,784,403 100% 10

Improve Customer Experience: Conceptual Rendering Draft Conceptual Rendering Wider Platforms Shelter/weather protection 11

Forest Park Terminal Station Conceptual Rendering Draft Conceptual Rendering 12

Improve Customer Experience: Conceptual Rendering Draft Conceptual Rendering ADA accessible Landscaping Pedestrian crossings/refuges Station entrance design and locations Reduced noise via station design Bike racks Lighting CTA maintenance & construction 13

Forest Park Terminal Station - Improve Terminal Site Redesign Forest Park terminal, yard and shop Improve site circulation Bus circulation and transfers Bike and pedestrian access to the terminal Highway and traffic flow around the terminal Meet increased rail yard and shop needs Inadequate fleet storage Inadequate shop size Improve yard configuration 14

Forest Park Terminal Existing Site Plan Residential Area Cemetery Residential Area Bus Transfer Park-n-Ride Cemetery Kiss-nRide Cemetery Residential Area 15

Forest Park Terminal Station Proposed Site Plan 16

CTA Proposal Forest Park Terminal Station Improvement Plan Retaining wall CTA Prairie Path Lot Parking CTA ComED Lot Parking 17

Forest Park Terminal Station Improvement Plan Pros Shop building can be accommodated within the existing footprint of CTA s property Express bus route access from I-290 can be accommodated New terminal can be constructed north of existing terminal Shop and maintenance access can be accommodated via route underneath the new rail yard Cons Parking would need to be relocated off site on north side of Van Buren St. (Identified in Forest Park Comp Plan, no work completed to date) Requires realignment of track and new bridge to access the terminal Requires shifting of car maintenance to another shop during construction of new shop Outstanding elements Traffic analysis of Van Buren Street Environmental obligations to advance planning 18

Maintain Existing Service Long-term Bring service speeds up to state-of-good-repair No 3rd track or express service Already serves as west side express due to current station spacing Remove stations closed in 1970s Continue working with Forest Park and local officials up through construction Short-term (immediate) CTA continues to perform interim slow zone maintenance work on branch, which began in spring 2014 5 nights/week, occasional weekends From Clinton to Forest Park, but focusing on west end of branch Continue working with Forest Park and other municipalities 19

Intermodal Coordination Continue to work with IDOT on corridor improvements Coordinate on overhead bridges to improve stations and access from street Project may be segmented into stations and track Potential for coordinating long term cost savings for both projects Provide transit alternative during highway construction 20

Summary of Overall Recommendations Complete reconstruction/modernization for the Forest Park branch Maintain existing entrance locations Improve customer experience Improve infrastructure Improve terminal site Maintain existing service Work with IDOT on corridor improvements Work with local municipalities 21

Next Steps Present results to public in coordination with IDOT I-290 Public Hearing Continue to evaluate funding options and project phasing 22

More Information Visit the project web site for more information and updates http://www.transitchicago.com/blueweststudy/ The study team is interested in hearing your ideas and opinions! If you have questions or comments about the study or would like to sign up for the mailing list, please write to us at: Chicago Transit Authority Attention: Maria-Teresa Roman, Government and Community Relations Officer 567 West Lake Street Chicago, IL 60661 blueweststudy@transitchicago.com 23