The Situation of Investigator Initiated Trials in Europe. Dr.N.Gökbuget

Similar documents
5 th Training Workshop for Micro-, Small- and Medium- Sized Enterprises (SMEs)

European Academy of Hospital Pharmacy Biotechnology Educational Summit. Clinical trials David Gerrett (Acknowledgment Mark Howells)

Independent academic study groups organised in the

Recommendations for Strengthening the Investigator Site Community

Good Clinical Practice (GCP) & Clinical Trial Registries

Study Files and Filing

ENTR/F/2/SF D(2009) Assessment of the Functioning of the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC Public Consultation

Impact of the transposition of the European Clinical Trials Directive. CEMO, Paris 17 November 2004

WRITTEN SUBMISSION ON THE OPERATION OF THE CLINICAL TRIALS DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC) AND PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE

Public Consultation Paper: Assessment of the Functioning of the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC

Exploring Good Clinical Practice guidance in clinical trials meeting summary

Stakeholder: Academic research organization for independent research

Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials

Risk-adapted approach to clinical trial regulation and monitoring

Guidance for applicants for ethics committee opinion on the conduct of a clinical trial of pharmaceuticals

Comments from: 1. General comments

Regulatory Challenges of Global Drug Development in Oncology. Jurij Petrin, M.D. Princeton, NJ

Highlights of the proposed Clinical Trials Regulation in Europe

EU Perspective on Regulatory Issues for Biologics

Track III: International Clinical Trials: Global Compliance Norms and EU Focus

Comments of the University-based Network of Coordinating Centers for Clinical Trials

Prof. Li Wei National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Corporate Presentation. October 2017

Clinical trials from CRA s point of view

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR RESEARCH. 17. Study Close Down

RESEARCH AUDIT Standard Operating Procedure

A Study of Practical Parameters and Their Relative Importance as Perceived by Various Stakeholders in Clinical Trials

Volunteering for Clinical Trials

Information for clinical researchers on transparency of clinical trial reporting

Global Clinical Trials in Korea

Guideline for participating sponsors

Investigating Clinical Trial Costs Comparative Analysis of Trial Cost Components in Key Geographies Table of Contents

Availability of human medicinal products in Europe how big is the problem and what can we do?

Good Clinical Practice (GCP): how does a laboratory that supports a clinical trial ensure compliance with these Regulations

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies

The European Medicines Agency Inspections ANNEX IV TO PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING GCP INSPECTIONS REQUESTED BY THE EMEA:

Framework of Regulation /Guidelines

Natalia Nayanova Director of Clinical Operations and General Manager. Accell Clinical Research 2016

Regulatory issues for academicled multinational trials in Asia: Who takes responsibility?

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Developing Strong Partnerships to Ensure Success With Global Medical Device Trials. 23-February-2017, OCT Burlingame

Trial Services. The allround trial specialist in cardiology Leading since cardialysis.com

Conducting Clinical Trials of Investigational Medicinal Products

OFFICE FOR RESEACH PROCEDURE. Site Initiation and Close-out

GCP Basics - refresher

Audit and Regulatory Inspection Nopanan Yaibuathes Clinical Research and Compliance Manager Roche Thailand Ltd.

Implementation of the EU-law. Tom Van Paepegem Quality co-ordinator D.R.U.G.

Advanced-therapy medicinal products: new competencies in hospital pharmacy Seminar PH4. Relevant Financial Relationships - None

OVERVIEW OF DIRECTIVE 2001/20. Paul Derbyshire. Background & History. Aims of Directive 2001/20

Topics summarised in this presentation are: method for defining quality level you want meaning of external controls quality assurance activities

Comments on: Name of Organisation

Standard Operating Procedure. GCP Auditing of Research Studies. SOP effective: 23rd January 2018 Review date: 23rd January 2020

1.0 Scope. 2.0 Abbreviations

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Standard Operating Procedure for Archiving

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 320. Developing a Research Protocol

FEBRUARY 2015 D. Lee Spurgin, Jr., PhD

Clinical trial applications in the EU and US

GCIG PRINCIPLES OF INDEPENDENCE v Sept The foundation of this has been directly taken from the 2010 document and updated/revised.

COMMON MARKET OF MEDICINES OF THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION: RULES OF GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE AND GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE

GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING CLINICAL TRIALS.

Standard Operating Procedures

COMMENTS FROM EUROPABIO GENERAL COMMENTS

E O. The EORTC Strategy for New Drug Development THE EORTC PROVIDES: The EORTC is the leading pan-european partner for high-quality clinical research

CTFG 10 September 2010

Good Clinical Practice

Overview of Privacy Requirements and Compliance Issues in International Clinical Trials

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

PROTOCOL DRAFTING GUIDE

IMP Management and Accountability

Harmonized Standard Operating Procedures for Academic Trials

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 805. Clinical Data Management System - CDMS SET-UP. Joint Research Office. Chief of Research and Innovation

How did it evolve? o Public disasters, serious fraud and abuse of human rights. o Trials of War criminals-nuremberg code 1949

The role of the Clinical Trials Unit Emma Hall PhD CStat Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU)

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Bulgaria

Regulatory Requirements for Medical Devices in China

What s New in GCP? FDA Clarifies, Expands Safety Reporting Guidance

Objectives Discuss the importance of proper data collection. Identify the types of data collected for clinical trials. List potential source documents

Author Signature: Date: 10 October 2017 The author is signing to confirm the technical content of this document

ESSENTIAL DOCUMENTS FOR THE CONDUCT OF A CLINICAL TRIAL

Primary Care mcta 2013: Guidance for use

Review of EU Clinical Trial Directive. 15 May 2012 Mike Beckers Sidley Austin LLP, Brussels

NIS Considerations - Bulgaria

NUVISAN GROUP. Our Philosophy

Guide to EU Clinical Trial Application Form

Position Description Clinical Research Associate

GCP Convergence Improves Transportability of Medical Device Clinical Data

Establishment of Clinical Trial Infrastructure

The compassionate use of medicinal products. An example: the French ATU system. 0ff label use in France

Impact of Clinical EU Directive on the implementation of Early development studies in Europe

1.4 Applicable Regulatory Requirement(s) Any law(s) and regulation(s) addressing the conduct of clinical trials of investigational products.


Developing a European First-in-Human Study: Three Key Decisions

RBM Risk Based Monitoring GCP Training 12/SEP/2015. Gabor Kiss Synexus Hungary2015

R&D Administration Manager. Research and Development. Research and Development. NHS Staff Trust-Wide THIS IS A CONTROLLED DOCUMENT

GCP/Clinical Investigation in Japan

UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UNIVERSITY OF LOUGHBOROUGH & UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST JOINT RESEARCH SUPPORT OFFICE

Outsourcing in Clinical Trials Europe 2014

The 6 th Kitasato-Harvard Symposium Session3:New Challenges Disease Areas. Investigator Initiated Trial (IIT) Future for IIT from the past experience

Biosimilar Medicines: Opportunities for Sustainable Healthcare. Opening Address Greg Perry Director General EGA London 3-4 May 2007

Transcription:

The Situation of Investigator Initiated Trials in Europe Dr.N.Gökbuget

Investigator Initiated Trials in Europe Difficulties and Possibilities 1. Situation for academic clinical trials after the EU directive 2. Practical approaches to deal with the situation 3. Perspectives and next steps

History of the EU Drug Regulation ICH-GCP Guidelines (Initiative of regulatory authorities / pharm. industry from EU / Japan / USA, 1996) Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EG (Later: EU GCP Directive (2005/28/EC) 08.4.2005) Transfer into national legislation Germany AMG Novelle 6.8.04 Other Countries Deadline: 2004 Major consequence for academic research: Therapy optimisation trials (TOPs) and Investigator Initiated Trials (IITs) have to follow the same rules as registration studies of pharmaceutical industry

Idea for a study and scientific concept Sponsor of study System of contracts Principal Investigator Pharmaceutical company CRO Hospitals Pharmacies Therapy protocol CRFs / EDC Quality Management Qualified Staff Selection of Hospitals - Qualification Budget application Schematic Course of a Study Registration Patient Insurance EUDRACT Application IRB Approval BfArM Confirmation Peer Review / Funding Local Authorities Activation of a Study Study Hospitals Information Initiation Study Meetings Randomisation - Advice Monitoring (Study Medication) Preparation, Labeling, Stocking, Dispatch Documentation Data Base Design, Data Entry, Validation Software, Honorarium, Archivation Analysis Improvement of Outcome Internet Presentation Public Relations SAE/SUSAR Reporting Source Data Monitoring Interim Reports End of Study

European Leukemia Net 2004: Major Aim to Foster International Academic IITs in Leukemias? Major field - Rare diseases, as leukemias - Treatment and research done in parallel (only way for progress in rare diseases) - Questions without commercial interest Low Budget (public funding, university budget, partly supported by industry) High potential costs - Multicenter, many hospitals (Health Care Standard!) - Long-term observation - High patient numbers IITs in Leukemias: Few industry-independent trials after the EU directive Danger: Industry-dependence of akademic research

Method: Topic: Eight specialised UK Clinical Trials Unit (CTUs) were interviewed Consequences of CTD on information flow, start, conduct, finalisation and cost of clinical trials Results: - Doubling of the cost of running non-commercial cancer clinical trials - Delay to the start of trials in the order of 6 to 10 months - Reduction / stop of international trials - Lack of central guidance - Lack of clarity regarding the interpretation of the guidance notes - Increase in essential documentation and paperwork - Staff is working beyond capacity and demoralised - Even experienced staff anxious about correct interpretation of CTD

Lancet 2003: if the commercial sector, in whose interests the Directive is principally drafted, forecasts an intolerable increase in red tape, publicly funded investigators are right to be very afraid indeed

Aim: EWALL- Procedure for Planning of an IIT Questionnaire To collect information for each country on - centers - laboratories - regulatory procedures (who can do what?) - all types of costs which may occur - practical procedures Pre-requisite for - contracts - budget planning

Clarification of Regulations and Costs per Country Questionnaire Country Sponsor Tasks to be taken France E-CRF Lab Centers Pharmacy Insurance Doc.fees National Language Hospital Admin. Monitoring Spain Italy Romania Germany Czech Republic

Current Situation of Academic Trials: Summary No harmonisation of trial regulations in Europe Different interpretation of laws and different attitude of authorities e.g. during inspections Excess of bureaucracy all over Europe High costs for akademic trials No success on political level

The Good Clinical Practice Guideline: A bronze standard for clinical research Grimes et al, Lancet 2005 GCP is not evidence-based Benefit not demonstrated Authorship and responsiblity not clear Written for registration trials Despite all this 1. It became a law and physicians are threatened with legal consequences 2. Scarce research funds are diversified to activities of unknown value

Investigator Initiated Trials in Europe Difficulties and Possibilities 1. Situation for akademic clinical trials after the EU directive 2. Practical approaches to deal with the situation - How to organise an academic international trial - Sources for support 3. Perspectives and next steps