Overview of USP Activities and How to Get Involved

Similar documents
9/2/2014. USP Monograph Modernization. Todays topics. USP basic. Todays topics. - USP basic. - USP publications. - USP monograph modernization

Role of USP Monographs and. General Chapters. Steve Zigler, Ph.D.

Challenges And Opportunities In Developing And Modernizing Public Standards For NF Monographs

Update to USP <621> Chromatography: What does this mean? USP 37 NF 32 1S Current as of August 2014

Latest USP Initiatives: Monographs, General Chapters, and Compounding

STIMULI TO THE REVISION PROCESS

USP Priority Excipient Monograph Modernization Updates

Proposed Revision of USP General Chapter Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography Compounding <823>

STIMULI TO THE REVISION PROCESS

Sample Sizes in Uniformity Measurements The Role of USP

Japanese Pharmacopoeia s Challenge to the Globalization

Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics

Elementverunreinigungen in Pharmaprodukten Neue Limits und Verfahren zur Bestimmung nach USP

USP Monograph Modernization Web Meeting. February 25, 2011

Quality of raw materials and manufacturing of advanced therapies. Fouad Atouf, Ph.D. Head, Global Biologics July 12, 2018

Commentary Pharmacopeial Forum 35(5) Sept.-Oct Interim Revision Announcements to USP 33-NF 28 Reissue

Thank You to United States Pharmacopeia for Their Sponsorship and Assistance

How we set specifications for impurities (including Genotoxic impurities) 24 May 2017 Elisabeth Kovacs, Apotex CSO Chemistry and Analytical Sci.

The United States Pharmacopeia Strategy on Biotherapeutic Products Standards. Jaap Venema, Ph.D. Chief Science Officer & Chair, Council of Experts

USP Standards for Ancillary Materials

USP/FDA OTC Drug Substances and Drug Products Workshop September 8-9, 2011 USP Headquarters Rockville, MD. Workshop Highlights and Recommendations

BRIEFING. . Over time, 466 may be used less frequently and may be withdrawn.

CANADA (HEALTH CANADA)

Role of Industry in USP Monograph Modernization. ExcipientFest Americas 2015 APRIL 29, Agenda

á1225ñ VALIDATION OF COMPENDIAL PROCEDURES

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES. Handling and working with Analytical Standards

Food Ingredients Stakeholder Forum Meeting #1 for the Cycle December 3, Discussion and Recommendations

Question-based Review (QbR)

Elemental Impurities and Animal Drugs An Update from CVM

Analytical Method Transfer Program. Richard B. Nguyen. Associate Scientific Liaison, Chemical Medicines, USP

Flexible and Pending Monographs

Analytical Methods Development and Validation

CANADA (HEALTH CANADA)

Overview of International Harmonization through the Pharmacopeial Discussion Group

Secundum Artem. USP Chapter <795> Pharmaceutical Compounding - Nonsterile Preparations INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND VOLUME 13 NUMBER 4

Validation/Verification of Test Methods An FDA Perspective. Laure H. Kairawicz, Ph.D. Senior Scientist Expert Witness

United State Pharmacopeia: Compendial Plastic Standards: Beyond Packaging

Elemental Impurities Update from CVM

How to Avoid Common Deficiencies in INDs and NDAs. Ramesh Raghavachari, Ph.D. Branch Chief, Branch IX ONDQA/OPS/CDER

Excipients Facing Increased Scrutiny How to Use Secondary Reference Standards to Help Maintain Regulatory Compliance

Implementation of the ICH Q3D guideline in the Ph. Eur.

Excipients in the Medicines Compendium: Progress and Perspectives

History and Update of Chapters 797 and 800

Derivation and Justification of Safety Thresholds

Capillary Electrophoresis Compendial Applications

Perspectives on Method Validation: Importance of Adequate Method Validation

USP: Advancing Public Health through Quality Standards

FUTURE-PROOF SOLUTIONS FOR REGULATED LABORATORIES IN THE FACE OF CHANGING USP <621> GUIDELINES

The Role of Chemists in the FDA Drug Approval Process

Identification of the need and uses of a reference standard

Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. CDER Small Business and Industry Assistance. (CDER SBIA) and New Drug Review.

ICH Q3D Guideline Impact on the Users: Perspective of a Finished Product Manufacturer John Glennon

Regulatory Approach to Nanotechnology-Based Drugs For Animals

Synopsis: FDA Process Validation Guidance

Strategies for IND Filing Success: Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls

Pharmaceutical Reference Standards: Overview and Role in Global Harmonization

Plastic Packaging Standards: Grandfathering Exemption. Horacio Pappa, Ph.D. Director, General Chapters

Why Q3D? Elemental Impurities: Is Your Company Prepared for ICH Q3D

Reflection Paper. The Role of Product-specific Monographs for Biotherapeutic Products in Pharmacopoeias

Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

CANADA (HEALTH CANADA)

Q & A on USP General Chapter <823> Revision Proposal Webinar held on 21 February 2011

THE USE OF NON-PHARMACEUTICAL GRADE SUBSTANCES IN THE UA ANIMAL CARE & USE PROGRAM

General concepts in the Ph. Eur.: theory and rationale

Tina Morrison, Ph.D. Chair, Committee on Modeling and Simulation Office of the Chief Scientist U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Excipient Stakeholder Forum Updates Stakeholder Forum Progress and Achievements. Steve Boudreau Gelatin Manufacturers Institute of America

Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and Biologics

Guidance for Industry

Future of Question-based Review and Regulatory Submissions

USP Chapters <232> and <233> Implementation Strategy. Horacio Pappa, Ph.D. Director - General Chapters U.S. Pharmacopeia

CONCEPT PAPER FOR COMMENT

PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

PQRI/USP Workshop on Implementation Status of ICH Q3D Elemental Impurity Requirements

Latest Trend of Drug Quality in Korea In-Kyu Kim, Ph.D. Division Director Drug Evaluation Department

Investigational New Drug Application

COMMENTARY First Supplement to the USP 33-NF 28 Reissue

Impurity Control in the European Pharmacopoeia

Drug Products, Labeling, and Packaging

FDA Guidance and Current Experience with New Drug Submissions

CURRENT CHALLENGES IN GLOBAL REGULATORY COMPLIANCE QUALITY OF PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS PHARMACOPOEIAL HARMONISATION PROCESS

Impurities from degradation of Drug Substances

CGMP Requirements for Investigational Products

A Generic Industry Perspective on Establishing Impurity Limits And a Corresponding Control Strategy

Guidance for Industry

Validation of Impurity Methods, Part I


Writing a Convincing Dossier on Impurities and Method Validation. Dr. Hans Ulrich Gally Swissmedic Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products

for IND and RDRC Regulated PET Compounding

CANADA (HEALTH CANADA)

Pharmacopoeial Reference Standards

Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Overview of comments received on 'Draft Guideline on the chemistry of active substances (veterinary) (EMA/CVMP/QWP/49477/2017)

European Regulations for Medicines. Place and Role of the European Pharmacopoeia in Europe Ph. Eur. concept

CDRH Scorecard Metric Determination. Presentation to the Balanced Scorecard Interest Group March 17, 2005

The European Pharmacopoeia

Established Conditions: Reportable CMC Changes for Approved Drug and Biologic Products Guidance for Industry

Tools to Ensure Safe Medicines: New Monograph Tests in USP- NF.

Session 7 Clinical Trial Assessment Bioequivalence Studies

Comparative Study of Regulatory Requirements for Biologics Filing in United States and European Union

Guidance for Industry

Transcription:

Overview of USP Activities and How to Get Involved Ravi Ravichandran, Ph.D. Principal Scientific Liaison, Chemical Medicines United States Pharmacopeia

Outline Introduction to the USP USP Standard Setting Process Monograph Up-to-Date Opportunities for Involvement 3

Introduction to the USP

About USP Mission: USP s mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods. Founded in 1820, nonprofit, private, independent, and self-funded USP is cited in US Law US FDA (product approval) USP Documentary Standard and Reference Standards (product compliance in US) Internationally recognized and globally focused More than 900 employees worldwide Laboratory facilities in U.S., India, China, Brazil, and Ghana Offices in Switzerland, Ethiopia, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Nigeria Works with more than 900 scientists, practitioners, and regulators to revise standards that help protect public health Values-driven organization focused on empowering its staff and volunteers 5

What We Do: USP: The Organization Establish and disseminate public written standards for the quality, purity, identity, strength, and labeling of medicines Provide physical Reference Standards to support tests and assays in the USP NF and FCC Educate producers, practitioners, and others seeking information on quality and USP standards Verify products for manufacturers and award the USP Verified Mark to those that meet our standards Work with international health agencies to improve the quality of medicines worldwide 6

USP Standards-Setting Bodies USP Convention Council of Experts Joint Standards-setting Subcommittees USP Staff Expert Committees Subcommittees Expert Panels Advisory Bodies Stakeholder Forums & Project Teams XXXX = Election of Experts = Recommendation = Makes recommendation XXXX = Decisional body

Participants in Standards-setting Activities 724 volunteers serving on 24 Expert Committees, 58 Expert Panels 415 Expert Committee members 309 Expert Panel members* 144 Government Liaisons from FDA CDER: 99 ORA: 4 CFSAN: 8 OC/ONDQA: 3 CBER: 9 CDRH: 1 CVM: 20 8 other Government Liaisons (US and international) Industry and consultants comprise almost 70% of volunteers 35% EC members are new, 25% are international * Does not include Expert Committee members also serving on Expert Panels

Shared Goals but difficult to balance FDA Public Safety (maximize) Unambiguous enforceable specifications Referee method(s) U.S. scope, participate globally 9

FDA Engagement Goes Beyond Enforcing USP Standards FDA reviews proposed standards in Pharmacopeial Forum and provides comments Participates as delegates, provides resolutions, provides members to the council of the Convention and other Convention committees Provides FDA liaisons to USP s expert committees Participates in workshops and stakeholder forums Works with USP through cooperative research and development agreements Collaborates with USP through quarterly meetings, pharmacopeial discussion group and special topics such as OTC monograph modernization, compounding, structured product labeling, pharmacologic classes 10

Council of Experts 6 Collaborative Groups and 24 Expert Committees 11

USP Standard Setting Process

Science is the Base of USP Standard Setting 13

Types of Standards Development New monographs: Proposed tests, limits, and validation (according to <821>,<1821>, <823> and <1823>) Packaging, storage, and labeling requirements Reference Standard commitments as needed Revisions: Reasonable justification Adequate supporting data for methods and specifications showing improvement USP-initiated revisions: Modernizations and other revisions can be based on other pharmacopoeias standards, ICH specifications, etc.

Monograph Development Timeline Depends on several factors such as the level of sponsor participation, complexity of the information, etc. Typically three to six months for preparation of draft Availability of the required RS bulks, inadequate information or lack of timely responses from sponsor may cause delays Publications process (3 4 months) It can take 18 to 24 months after publication in PF for a monograph to become official

Sources of Request for Revision Manufacturers with or without US-FDA approval US-FDA Expert Committee Members Expert Panels USP staff (scientific liaison, reference standard scientists, and others) Harmonization with other pharmacopeia Trade and other organizations 16

Monograph Up-to-Date

United States Pharmacopeia National Formulary A compendia of internationally recognized standards for drug substances, dosage forms, compound preparations, excipients, and dietary supplements. It contains: More than 4,900 monographs with specifications for identity, purity, quality, and strength. 2% of the monographs are related to radioactive articles More than 320 General Chapters, with step-by-step tests and methods. 4 general chapters are related to radioactive articles Standards that when deemed official by USP, are FDA-enforceable for drugs manufactured or marketed in the U.S. 18

Chemical Medicines Demographics Expert Committees Therapeutic Category Number of Official Monographs Total Number of Volunteers % new volunteers Chemical Medicines 1 Chemical Medicines 2 Chemical Medicines 3 Chemical Medicines 4 Chemical Medicines 5 Chemical Medicines 6 Antiviral, Antimicrobials & Antibiotics 977 15 53 Cardiovascular, Cough, Cold, & Analgesic 678 16 38 Gastrointestinal, Renal, Endocrine and Ophthalmology, Oncology, Dermatology & Veterinary Psychiatric, Psychoactive, Neuromuscular, Aerosol, & Radioactive drugs, Imaging agents 959 17 41 799 18 39 Pulmonary & Steroids 570 16 38 Over the Counter (OTC) 475 18 27 19

USP-NF Up to Date USP Convention Resolution 2: USP will meet the needs of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), industry, and other stakeholders for modern monographs within USP NF. USP will work to: eliminate the existing backlog of monographs in need of modernization, and proactively evaluate and update monographs to maintain their relevance given scientific advances and evolving manufacturing and regulatory approaches. USP will work with industry and FDA to explore new strategies for sharing analytical methods and specifications needed to modernize monographs. 20

USP-NF Up to Date What does USP-NF Up to Date mean? Current: Add new monographs & general chapters in timely manner. Omit monographs / general chapters that are no longer needed Relevant: Modernize and/or revise monographs & general chapters to reflect state of the industry practices. Ensure availability of Reference Standards Suitable for their intended use: All components clear, complete and correct. Remove unnecessary tests. Appropriate selection of reference standards 21

Monograph Up to Date Prioritization Scheme OTHER Test Update packaging and storage conditions Update some test methods Delete non-relevant procedures (animal distribution test) Add identification test(s) ASSAY procedure (Strength) Replace nonspecific tests (wet chem., UV-Vis, titration, etc. as appropriate) Radionuclidic Identity Radiochemical Identity Tests (Identity) Eliminate Hazardous Solvents and reagents Replace obsolete chromatographic columns (GC packed columns or non commercially available HPLC columns) Add impurity method Combine multiple impurity tests or eliminate non value added tests Radionuclidic and Radiochemical Impurities procedure (Purity)

Monograph Modernization - Identification, Assay, Organic Impurities, Other Sections Add Identification Test Add Organic Impurities Replace HPLC with TLC or vice versa Eliminate hazardous procedures and materials such as solvents, reagents, and other chemicals Delete non value added procedures Update on Reference Standards Up-to-date Omission Reagents tagging Additional monograph information (e.g., chemical structure, chemical name. etc.) where appropriate

Updated Identification Test A. Radionuclidic Identity (See Radioactivity 821, 5. Identification of Radionuclides, 5.1 Half-Life Determination.) 1S (USP41) Its half-life, determined using a suitable detector system (see Radioactivity 821, Half Life Determination ), is 9.5 10.5 min. The half-life of 18F is 105-115 min. 1S (USP41) B. Radiochemical Identity: The Rf value of Fludeoxyglucose F 18 in the Sample solution corresponds to the Rf value of USP Fludeoxyglucose RS in the Standard solution, as obtained in the Radiochemical purity Acceptance criteria: The R F value of fludeoxyglucose 18F in the Sample solution is 90% 110% of the R F value of fludeoxyglucose as determined in the Standard solution in the test for Radiochemical Purity. 1S (USP41) 24

Other Updates Deleted the Specific activity ph : 791 4.5 7.5 Replace the requirement of using ph meter with ph paper Analysis: Apply a suitable volume of Injection on a suitable ph indicator paper, short-range. Acceptance criteria: 4.5 7.5 1S (USP41) 25

USP-NF Up to Date Opportunities and Challenges Opportunities: Stakeholder collaborations and global expert panels can stimulate additional avenues for both update and harmonization. Sourcing procedures from other compendia, literature, etc. Use of global USP laboratory facilities to develop and validate procedures. With FDA involvement, prioritizing and requesting submissions - the hope is that industry is much more likely to submit a proposal. Challenges: Prioritization of monographs and chapters in need of updating Obtaining procedures and acceptance criteria from sponsors Balancing the need to introduce modern methodology with the feasibility to implement by users

Opportunities for involvement Provide test procedure with validation data and approved specifications Get your own free online subscription to PF http://www.usp.org/usp-nf/pharmacopeial-forum Review PF proposals and send your comments Submit your application on-line for panel consideration Contact USP rr@usp.org 301-816-8330 Periodically visit the site http://www.usp.org/usp-nf/key-issues/standards-radioactive-articles-usp-nf 27