HORIZON 2030: Plan Projects November 2005

Similar documents
PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

2. Goals and Objectives

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

MARC Congestion Management Process Policy

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

Database and Travel Demand Model

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

2030 Transportation Policy Plan SUMMARY PRESENTATION. Land Use Advisory Committee November 15, 2012

AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

1RUWKZHVW#:LFKLWD 0DMRU#,QYHVWPHQW#6WXG\

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

Mobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

Appendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements

AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA

OKI Congestion Management System Analysis. Data Collection Report Year 1

Transportation Problems and Issues Excerpts from WWW Links

Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan

2017 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL KIPDA REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN MARCH 30, 2018

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Project Initiation Form

The Victorian Transport Plan (Department of Transport, 2008).

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

Congestion Management Process Update

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

Updated Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations Administrative Guidelines

New York Metropolitan Transportation Council. Plan Regional Transportation Plan A Shared Vision for a Sustainable Region

HCM 6th Edition Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide (PPEAG) to the HCM Bringing Back-of-the-Envelope Back.

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

SECTION 5. Existing Conditions TRANSPORTATION NETWORK TRANSPORTATION

Transportation Advisory Board May 21, 2014

Chapter 5. Congestion Management Program. Chapter 5

Grottoes. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process

Article 16 Traffic Impact Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2050

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:

Webinar Series for Comprehensive Plan Updates. Transportation Overview

CHAPTER 8 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE. Joint Study Session April 13, 2017

GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

TBARTA 2015 Regional Transportation Master Plan 2040 Regional Long Range Transportation Plan AUGUST 2015

THE REGION S PLAN POLICY FRAMEWORK. August 2015

RTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015

City of Menifee. Public Works Department. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines

Section 7 Environmental Constraints

Funding Intelligent Transportation Systems in the Los Angeles Region

MPO Member Communities:

There are two (2) amendments for which staff is requesting recommendation to the Transportation Policy Council this month:

POLK COUNTY TPO Polk County 2060 Transportation Vision Plan Final Report. ADOPTED June 18, 2009

Joint Meeting- Stakeholder Committee & Technical Committee

2.0 ACCESS OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIES

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS

SOUTHWEST LRT (METRO GREEN LINE EXTENSION)

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

Chapter 4: Transportation and Land Use

Committee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No

Chapter 9: Vision Plan. Chapter 9. Vision Plan. Lake Loveland. Image 179 Credit: City of Loveland

Appendix E-1. FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook. (Excerpts)

The Level of Service Metric and. Alternatives for Multi-Modal Transportation. in Oakland

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018

Kentucky River Area Development District

Transportation and Utilities

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

Louisville (KY-IN) Metropolitan Planning Area

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

Chapter 2 Transportation Element Goals, Objectives and Policies

APPENDIX D. Glossary D-1

TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN AND COUNTY REGULATIONS VISION FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ROAD NETWORK SECTION 7

Lubbock Outer Route Feasibility Study Report Executive Summary

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF MAPS CHAPTER 1: REGIONAL GOODS MOVEMENT: LINKS TO OUR PAST AND TO OUR FUTURE

Chapter 5 - Transportation

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

Mendocino Forest Products Grading For Industrial Land Improvements

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm

Project Evaluation Criteria

County of Calaveras Department of Planning

Administrative Modification 22 FY FY 2021 Transportation Improvement Program October 25, Page 1

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

DES MOINES AREA MPO. Environment Roundtable. October 13, 2015

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

I-710 Project Committee Meeting

Once known as warehousing and distribution, the process

TRB WEBINAR PROGRAM Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual: Contents

Transcription:

Horizon PROJECTS 2030 Projects 10-1

10-2

The Horizon 2030 Project Information section is comprised of individual project information in alphabetical order by project name. The information provided for each individual project includes: Project Type Project Name KIPDA Identification Number Description Purpose Primary Contact Agency (Project Sponsor) State Identification Number County in which Project is located Project Cost The Year in which the Project is estimated to be complete Regional Priority Status Air Quality Status Subject to CMS Review Proximity to a Freight Network Corridor Proximity to a Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority Corridor Whether or not a project includes bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities Individual Project Map (where applicable) Several of these items warrant further explanation: Regional Priority Status A Yes indicates the project is a Regional Priority. The project has been found to meet at least one criterion for being identified as a Regional Priority. For more information please turn to page 2-1. Air Quality and Project is considered Regionally Significant Status A Yes indicates the project may alter travel behavior in a significant manner and subsequently impact the area s air quality, making the project regionally significant. Regionally significant projects are defined as those projects (other than an exempt project) that are on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside of the region, major activity centers in the region, major planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, etc., or transportation terminals as well as most terminals themselves) and would normally be included in the modeling of a metropolitan area s transportation network, including at a minimum all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer an alternative to regional highway travel. Projects that impact air quality are reviewed by federal, state, and local agencies to assure their inclusion in the Transportation Plan s air quality analysis. A No indicates the project is exempt from air quality analysis or its impact was not significant enough to impact travel behavior to a degree which could be measured using analysis tools. For more information please refer to the Air Quality section. Subject to CMS Review All projects were considered for the Congestion Management System (CMS) Project Level Review. A Yes indicates that it met the criteria for undergoing the CMS Project Level Review. A No may mean one of several things: 1) the project did not meet the criteria for completing the 10-3

CMS Project Level Review, 2) a CMS Project Level Review had already been completed during previous planning activities, 3) the project had advanced to a point where funding resources had been identified and they were funds other then federal funds. For more information about the CMS Project Level Review please turn to page 2-6. Freight Corridors Within a ¼ Mile or on a Freight Corridor: A Yes indicates that some part of the project is located on or within a ¼ mile of a segment of the Freight Network Corridor. For more information please refer to the Freight section of Horizon 2030. Bicycle & Pedestrian Priority Corridors Within a ¼ Mile or on a Bicycle & Pedestrian Priority Corridor: A Yes indicates that some part of the project is located on or within a ¼ mile of a segment of the Bicycle & Pedestrian Priority Corridor. For more information please refer to the Alternate Mode section. Project Type Most projects and programs included here accomplish more than one specific function; the Project Type classification allows the reader to quickly surmise the main function of a particular project. There are a total of 11 project types: BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN - The implementation of physical bicycle and/or pedestrian amenities. MAINTENANCE - Transportation infrastructure preservation. OPERATIONS - Improvements to existing traffic operations, such as a turning lane, traffic signal timing, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) components, etc. PROGRAM - Funding for program administration, such as ridesharing programs, etc. ROADWAY CAPACITY - Projects that include the addition of a motorized vehicle travel lane. SAFETY - Safety improvements. STREETSCAPE - Improvements along a street or roadway; these may range from installation of sound barriers to the planting of wildflowers. STRUCTURE - The construction/renovation of buildings that utilize transportation funds. STUDY - Transportation plan for a specified area, such as a corridor or intersection. TRANSIT - Public transportation improvements. WETLAND - Creation of a wetland. Individual Project Map - Project Location Inventory The Individual Project Map depicts the proposed physical location of a project and the quartermile area surrounding it. In addition, the project location inventory included in past long-range transportation plans as a matrix is being shown herein graphically; airports, superfund sites, 100-year and 500-year flood plains, historic sites, schools, etc., are shown on Individual Project Maps in Horizon 2030 to offer more understanding of the relationship between a project, its physical surroundings, and the environmental and community impacts it may have. 10-4

Individual Project Maps are not available for every project since there are some projects that can not be mapped. Programs may not have a specific geographic location. Studies may not have a defined geographic scope. A project with an open to public date of 2025 may be too conceptual at this point to pinpoint an exact location. Where possible, the Individual Project Map is provided. On the following project pages, there are maps associated with various projects. Due to space constraints, the legend for all symbols appearing on those maps is located here. Intersection Non-Motorized Transit Structure Non-Motorized Improve- Roadway Improvement Transit Improvement School Historic/Archeological Bicycle & Pedestrian Priority Freight Corridor Railroad Street Centerline Major Roads Streams 1/4 Mile Project Buffer Wetland Superfund Site 100 Year Flood- 500 Year Flood- Ohio River County Boundary Need More Information? Should you need additional information on any project or other information included in Horizon 2030, contact either KIPDA staff or the Primary Project Sponsor. KIPDA staff can be reached by phone: (502) 266-6084; by fax: (502) 266-5074; by regular mail: KIPDA Transportation Division, 11520 Commonwealth Drive, Louisville, Kentucky, 40299; or by email: kipda.trans@ky.gov. 10-5

10-6