About 900 total tests (that we know of)

Similar documents
groundwater/surface-water interactions Evan Christianson, PG Barr Engineering Company

Analysis of the Cromwell, Minnesota Well 4 (593593) Aquifer Test CONDUCTED ON MAY 24, 2017 CONFINED QUATERNARY GLACIAL-FLUVIAL SAND AQUIFER

Lab 6 - Pumping Test. Pumping Test. Laboratory 6 HWR 431/

*** IN THE PUMPING WELL

Evaluation of the Potential for Unreasonable Impacts from the EP Well Field, Hays County, Texas

WaterTech Brent Morin, B.Sc., P.Geol. Waterline Resources Inc.

Aquifer Science Staff, January 2007

SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY GROUND WATER HYDRAULICS

Comparison between Neuman (1975) and Jacob (1946) application for analysing pumping test data of unconfined aquifer

University of Arizona Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Dr. Marek Zreda

Daniel R. Hadley, PG and Daniel B. Abrams, PhD

Ground-Water Flow to Wells Introduction. Drawdown Caused by a Pumping Well

Hydrogeologic Characterization. Thomas Doe Winter 2009

Karst Spring: Generalized Monitoring Strategy

Regulatory Method (WAT-RM-26)

Leaky Aquifers. log s drawdown. log time. will the red observation well look more like?.. A infinite aquifer. D none of the above

Well Hydraulics. The time required to reach steady state depends on S(torativity) T(ransmissivity) BC(boundary conditions) and Q(pumping rate).

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

SEES 503 SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES GROUNDWATER. Instructor. Assist. Prof. Dr. Bertuğ Akıntuğ

Determination of hydrogeological parameters from pumping of water wells in Alberta

Calcareous Fen: Generalized Monitoring Strategy

Steady Flow in Confined Aquifer

Division of Drinking and Ground Waters. Division: Number: Category: Status: Issued:

Rudd Westside Winery Pump Test and Well Interference Analysis 4603 Westside Road, Healdsburg

Task 4.2 Technical Memorandum on Pumping Impacts on Squaw Creek

Part 1: Steady Radial Flow Questions

WELLHEAD PROTECTION DELINEATION REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE OF BEAR LAKE DECEMBER 2002

Investigation of Groundwater Resources and Airborne-Geophysical Investigation of Selected Mineral Targets in Namibia

10 Partially-penetrating wells

Flow-Through Lake/Wetland: Generalized Monitoring Strategy

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC TABLES AND CURVES

9 Multi-layered aquifer systems

COPYRIGHT. Thickness of sand filter bed = 4 ft [1.22m]

Characterization and Remediation of Diesel in a Fractured Rock Aquifer with a Nutrient-Flushing System

The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Infrastructure Msc.

Minimum Saturated Thickness Calculator

RESULTS OF AN AQUIFER TEST AT VERMILLION, SOUTH DAKOTA

SATEM 2002: Software for Aquifer Test Evaluation

Performance and Analysis of Aquifer Slug Tests and Pumping Tests Policy

Groundwater Occurrence & Movement: An Introductory Discussion with Application to Northeastern Illinois

APPENDIX 5: SAMPLE MODEL RESULTS

Modeling with MLU. applying the multilayer approach to aquifer test analysis. Tutorial. Kick Hemker & Jeff Randall. Amsterdam Seattle 1

Designing an ISCO Remedy for a Wood Treating Site Using Hydrogeologic Testing, High-Resolution Site Characterization, and 3D Modeling

Module 2. The Science of Surface and Ground Water. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur

Appendix F Pump Test Technical Memoranda

Case Study A Comparison of Well Efficiency and Aquifer Test Results Louvered Screen vs. Continuous Wire-Wrapped Screen Big Pine, California

FLOWING FLUID ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY PROFILING AN INVENTIVE AND COST EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO CONVENTIONAL DOWNHOLE HYDRAULIC PROFILING TECHNIQUES

Drainage area of wells defined as an oil reservoir area met pressure disturbance of production

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

Protecting, maintaining and improving the health of all Minnesotans

I almost horizontal line

Aquifer Airlift Testing

Results of Morris Bridge Sink Pumping Test Hillsborough County, Florida Final Report

EXPLORATION AND PUMPING TEST RESULTS FOR A HIGH-YIELD CRYSTALLINE BEDROCK WELL IN TOBAGO

Amah E. A 1, Anam G. S 1 1 Department of Geology, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

The case for longer duration of pumping tests and confined aquifer well deep well seals

COOLING TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE

Appendix C: 2014 Monitoring Results and Interpretation

FLOW IN POROUS MEDIA LUÍS RIBEIRO INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TECNICO UNIVERSITY OF LISBON

Determination of Groundwater Inflow Rates for Longwall Mining, German Creek, Bowen Basin, Queensland

Geothermal Power Capacity of Wells in Non-Convective Sedimentary Formations

Amendment to the Wellhead Protection Plan. Part I

discharges and recovery tests

Recharge Lake/Wetland: Generalized Monitoring Strategy

Hydrogeology 101 3/7/2011

Prediction of Water Production in CBM wells

Chippewa County Groundwater Study 3 rd Public outreach meeting

13 Recovery tests. Figure 13.1 Time drawdown and residual drawdown

Handbook of Ground Water Development

[ ] (6) The tidal correction procedure is repeated for all segments of the tidal and groundwater drawdown record.

4. Groundwater Resources

Groundwater and surface water: a single resource. Santa Cruz River, Tucson

WHPA AND DWSMA DELINEATIONS AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS

Groundwater Investigations for CCR Landfills in Karst Terrain

Characterizing Groundwater and Surface- Water Interactions in Selected Northeast Twin Cities Lakes

Uncertainty of estimates of groundwater yield for the Cambrian-Ordovician Aquifer in northeastern Illinois

Fracturing Overview: Fact vs. Fiction Andy Bond, Subsurface Manager December 8,

Underground pumped storage hydroelectricity using abandoned works (deep mines or. /

William Wilmot Matrix Solutions Inc. 118, Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Purpose: Continued development of a conceptual model, incorporating the hydrogeologic information.

Measuring Flow Rate in Crystalline Bedrock Wells Using the Dissolved Oxygen Alteration Method

Analysis of Sedimentary Geothermal Systems Using an Analytical Reservoir Model

PRESSURE TRANSIENT BEHAVIOUR OF A HORIZONTAL STEAM INJECTION WELL IN A NATURALLY FRACTURED RESERVOIR

16.1 Confined aquifers, unsteady-state flow

Advanced Well Test Analysis and Traditional Methods For Injection Well Evaluation 1

3 Method of Data Collection

Groundwater Protection Plan in Response to Release of Fracking Fluids in Shallow Sandstone

Production prediction model of coalbed methane wells at stable production stage

Supplemental Guide II-Delineations

Some geomechanical aspects of well integrity

AQTESOLV for Windows. User's Guide. By HydroSOLVE, Inc.

Investigation of Possible Extra ~Recharge During Pumping in N ottinghant.aquifer

> The Permsylvani a State Univ.ersity

ISCO of TCE-Impacted Groundwater in Bedrock through an Enhanced Fracture Network

Civil Engineering Department College of Engineering

HYDROLOGIC FACTORS AFFECTING SINKHOLE DEVELOPMENT IN A WELL FIELD IN THE KARST DOUGHERTY PLAIN, SOUTHWEST OF ALBANY, GEORGIA

Predicting Groundwater Sustainability: What Tools, Models and Data are Available?

Groundwater Modeling Guidance

Ground Water and Wells. Basic (Geo)Science for Sustainable a Future. Dr. David Boutt. UMass Amherst, Geosciences Department

ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR SATURATEDlUNSATURATED HYPORHEIC ZONE FLOW DUE TO ALLUVIAL WELL DEPLETIONS. Garey Fox and Deanna Durnford

Transcription:

A DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROCEDURE TO IDENTIFY THE EFFECTS OF BEDDING-PLANE FRACTURES AND IMPROVE THE ESTIMATES OF HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES IN THE PALEOZOIC BEDROCK AQUIFERS OF SOUTHEASTERN MINNESOTA An investigation of the impact of well efficiency on the variability of hydraulic properties Justin Blum Source Water Protection Unit

USED EXISTING DATA SETS About 900 total tests (that we know of)

~490 WITH UNIQUE WELL NUMBERS ~190 tests in bedrock aquifers ~ 90 tests in the St. Peter Prairie du Chien Jordan Aquifer System ~10 tests re evaluated, evaluated, so far

HOW DO WE KNOW THERE IS FRACTURE FLOW? MGS has Identified Bedding Plane Fractures in Bedrock Every Place we looked. Other lines of evidence, primarily hydraulic response

GEOPHYSICAL LOGGING JORDAN SANDSTONE

COMPARISON OF FLOW LOGGING AND RESULTS OF PRODUCTION TEST

HIGH VARIABILITY IN PROPERTIES BETWEEN WELLS, DURING TEST OF THIRD WELL

HYDRAULIC RESPONSE OF POROUS MEDIA FLOW WONEWOC SANDSTONE - RADIAL DISTANCE 940 FT.

HYDRAULIC RESPONSE OF FRACTURE FLOW WONEWOC SANDSTONE - RADIAL DISTANCE 70 FT.

HYDRAULIC RESPONSE OF FRACTURE FLOW GALENA GROUP

HYDRAULIC INDICATORS OF FRACTURE FLOW

ANOMALOUS HIGH-EFFICIENCY WELLS RESULT FROM AN ENHANCED WELLBORE: Common well construction techniques such as blasting and bailing And / or Naturally occurring bedding plane fractures Result in an increased surface area of aquifer available to the well

QUESTIONS IMPACT OF HIGH WELL EFFICIENCY ON: Drawdown at the pumping well? Drawdowns at nearby observation wells? Estimates of hydraulic properties?

WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE - DATA FROM TEST IN GLACIAL OUTWASH -

DRAWDOWN IN A 100 % EFFICIENT PUMPING WELL

DRAWDOWN IN AN INEFFICIENT PUMPING WELL

DRAWDOWN IN AN ENHANCED PUMPING WELL

TEST DATA FROM CANNON FALLS PWS WELLS, 1999 JORDAN SANDSTONE

TYPICAL OBSERVED DISTANCE DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN RELATIONSHIP EXAMPLE 1

NOT A GOOD FIT Breakdown of logarithmic relationship between drawdown and distance?

MATCH OBWELL DATA ONLY, BETTER FIT

WHY IS PUMPED WELL SO EFFICIENT?

WHAT IS THE EFFECTIVE RADIUS OF THE WELL?

DEFINITION IN LITERATURE Effective Radius Distance from the well that the theoretical drawdown equals the drawdown outside the screen.* *: JACOB, C. E. (1947) Drawdown Test to Determine the Effective Radius of Artesian Wells, Trans. ASCE, 112:1047.

EFFECTIVE RADIUS OF SCREENED WELL SCALE: INCHES

EFFECTIVE RADIUS OF ENHANCED BOREHOLE SCALE: FEET +

STEADY STATE CONDITIONS Thiem Equation For radial flow in a planar fracture intercepted by a well Where: R = radius of influence r w = radius of well H = hydraulic head at r = R h w = hydraulic head at r = r w

STEADY STATE CONDITIONS Thiem Equation Effective radius of enhanced borehole = radius of influence? Where: R = radius of influence r w = radius of well H = hydraulic head at r = R h w = hydraulic head at r = r w

POSSIBLE DEFINITIONS - SPECIFIC FOR FRACTURED ROCK AQUIFERS - Enhanced Well Radius Distance from the pumped well that the drawdown in the fractured rock aquifer equals the drawdown in the well. Radius of Fracture Influence Distance from the pumped well that the vertical lh head ddiff differences in the fractured rock aquifer caused by fracture flow flow are negligible.

HOW DOES WELL EFFICIENCY IMPACT AQUIFER TEST DATA? INTERIM CONCLUSIONS: Drawdown in the pumping well is not representative of intergranular conditions within the aquifer system Efficiency affects the steady state state analysis, apparent transmissivity is too large when pumping well is included These characteristics i are caused by a large effective radius of the pumping well, on the scale of tens to hundreds of feet

HOW DOES WELL EFFICIENCY IMPACT AQUIFER TEST DATA? ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS: Is the enhanced well radius correct and is it useful? How does high well efficiency affect transient data? What analysis technique(s) work best to evaluate this issue?

TRANSIENT (THEIS) DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN TYPE CURVE

TRANSIENT (THEIS) DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN TYPE CURVE Time / Radial distance 2

THEIS DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN CANNON FALLS DATA

THEIS DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN PLOT

THEIS DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN PLOT

THEIS CURVE MATCH CLOSEST OBWELL

EFFECT OF AN ENHANCED WELLBORE

CAN MATCH OF PUMPING WELL DATA BE IMPROVED? MODIFY DRAWDOWN? Too hard to do (much like modeling) MODIFY RADIAL DISTANCE? Use range of enhanced radii from steady state state plot Pick an average radius (out of a hat) Project the data from a twenty four hour test to 10,000 minutes to estimate true steady state state conditions

ENHANCED WELL RADIUS - UNCERTAINTY Between 100 and 210 feet

TRY ENHANCED WELL RADIUS OF ~160 FEET

THEIS DISTANCE-DRAWDOWN DRAWDOWN PLOT

GOOD MATCH OF PUMPING WELL AND NEAREST OBWELL

HOW DOES WELL EFFICIENCY IMPACT AQUIFER TEST DATA? CONCLUSION: Both steady state state and transient analysis are affected in a symmetrical way These distance drawdown drawdown analysis techniques, used together, can work to evaluate and correct the influence of anomalous well efficiency on T, S, and L The process is highly circular (use with caution)

ESTIMATED HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES? Original T = 5,500 ft 2 /day, +/ 800 ft 2 /day S = 5.0e 5 L = 1760 feet

ESTIMATED HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES? Original T = 5,500 ft 2 /day, +/ 800 ft 2 /day S = 5.0e 5 L = 1760 feet Revised T = 4,250 ft 2 /day, +/ 220 ft 2 /day S = 5.0e 5 L = 4000 feet (minimum)

HOW DOES THIS PROCEDURE IMPROVE ESTIMATES OF HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES? Forces consistency between conceptual models of flow system: for a given T, and storage (transient) is consistent with leakage (steady state) state) Identifies wells with an anomalous response to pumping Potentially corrects response, or Allows well to be excluded from analysis Reduces number of individual analyses (plots/well) and produces summary plots

PROCEDURE Gather bunches of data minimum 24 hour test duration pumping well and a minimum of two observation wells at different radial distances Apply both steady state state and transient solutions to Identify well efficiency efficiency issues and other poorly matched dd data Estimate the enhanced radius of pumping well from steady state state analysis (semi log plot) Test the revised radius with Theis distance drawdown drawdown plot

CAN PROCEDURE BE USEFUL IN OTHER SETTINGS?

AS APPLIED TO AN INEFFICIENT WELL SEMI STEADY-STATE STATE

AS APPLIED TO AN INEFFICIENT WELL STEADY-STATE STATE

EFFECT OF NEGATIVE WELL EFFICIENCY

EFFECT OF NEGATIVE WELL EFFICIENCY

BRING OUT YOUR TESTS Distance drawdown techniques appear to work well to detect and correct the influence of a borehole with an effective radius that differs from the well construction Many existing datasets are amenable for re evaluation evaluation for the influence of an enhanced wellbore Minimum data requirements are a pumping well and at least two observation wells at different radial distances