Assessment of the Benefits of Ecosystem Restoration with i-tree Eco

Similar documents
Chicagoland Region i-tree Eco Assessment An analysis of the structure and function of the region s urban forest. Gary Watson

Assessing Your Local Urban Forest. David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY

David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service

Environmental Benefits Analysis for Trees in Clifton, Ohio

Minnetonka Code of Ordinances

The Value of Your Urban Forest: i-tree Tools Al Zelaya The Davey Institute

2016 Urban Forest Analysis within Three Parks in Burlington, Vermont

Invitation For Bids Timber Sale

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Public Trees for Springfield, Ohio

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Public Trees for Chillicothe, Ohio

Valoración ambiental y económica de la infraestructura verde en las ciudades de Estados Unidos y su replicabilidad en Ciudades Chilenas

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Trees for Beavercreek, Ohio T. Davis Sydnor and Sakthi Subburayalu School of Environment and Natural Resources

The Science Behind Quantifying Urban Forest Ecosystem Services. David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY, USA

An Analysis of Street Tree Benefits for

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Trees for Greenmount Cemetery in Springfield, Ohio

Benefits of Goshen s Public Trees. Stormwater Mitigation

STRATUM: The Benefits and Costs of the Green Infrastructure

Age Structure of Trees in. Du Page County Forest Preserves. Scott N. Kobal. Presentation to Commission February 21, 2017

Inventory and Assessment of Mud Pond Country Park

Quantifying Ecosystem Service and Values of the Urban Forest. David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY, USA

Inventory and Assessment of Shelburne Farms Woodlots

USDA Forest Service. Davey Tree Expert Co. National Arbor Day Foundation Society of Municipal Arborists International Society of Arboriculture

Environmental Benefits Analysis for Trees in Bowersville, Ohio

Collaborative Urban Forest Studies in the GTA. May 12 th 2010 Meaghan Eastwood

Evaluation of an Oak Woodland Restoration at Deer Grove Forest Preserve. Pete Jackson February 7, 2009

or Project Desert Canopy Growing a Healthier Community

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Trees for the Governor s Residence and Heritage Gardens

Climate Change & New England Forests

Frequently Asked Questions about the UFORE model (

Carbon Offsets & Urban Forests

An Analysis of Environmental Benefits. Park Trees

Sustaining Northern Forests in the face of Climate Change

STRATUM: The who, what, when, where and how of street trees

Summary Report Calculated Public Tree Values and Benefits for The City of Ann Arbor The City of Ann Arbor, Michigan July, 2009

Monitoring Urban Forest Structure and Function after Hurricane and Assessing Ecosystem Services for Louisiana Cities

i-tree Using Technology to Tell the Story of the Value of Community Trees Scott Maco The Davey Tree Expert Company

Tree Identification Topics: Original Bearing and Line Trees

8) Which of the following species is best adapted to poorly drained sites? a) Bur oak b) Eastern red cedar c) Black ash d) Yellow birch

Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values: Douglas County, Kansas

Adapting to Climate Change in the Northeast: Experiences from the Field. Climate Projections for Forests: A Quick Summary

Adapting to Climate Change in the Northeast: Experiences from the Field

An Analysis of Street Tree Benefits for. Bellbrook

STRATUM Technology Showcase

Overview. United States Department of Agriculture. Sampling error (percent) Sampling error (percent)

Forest Stewardship Plan

NTRALHARDWOOD NOTES. Estimating Oak Growth and Yield. Managed Stand Yield. Individual Tree Growth and Yield Models

The Hardwood Forests in Changing Times - Adapting to New Realities. Charlie Becker Utilization and Marketing Manager

Forestry Unit. 7.A.3a Measure length, capacity, weight/mass and angles using sophisticated instru ments (e.g., compass, protractor, trundle wheel).

Adaptation Demonstration: Menominee Forest

Maximizing the Environmental Services and Value of Plano s Urban Forest

State Forest Management: Pennsylvania

Considerations in Developing The Ohio State University Athletic Complex

Determining the Age and Benefits of a Tree

Defining Urban Forest Assets: Tree Assessments and Inventories

Street and Park Tree Inventories - How It Improves Pest Management

Projected Climate Change Impacts to Floodplain Forests in the Twin Cities Metro

The Ups and Downs of Final Harvests*

Tree Inventory Summary Report

Forest carbon 101. Climate change adaptation and mitigation considerations. Overview Module Silviculture Institute 5/24/2017

March 29, Caring for Trees in a Changing Climate

Timber Appraisal Report. Permit Holder Sale Type RAN Permit Number. Block # Legal Description Sec-Twp-Rng County Cd ,933.

URBAN FORESTED WATERSHEDS ADAPTATION PLANNING AND PRACTICES

Climate Change Response Framework

Local Ecosystem Analysis Garland, Texas Calculating the Value of Nature

Greening Oakland s Infrastructure Tree by Tree

Illinois Route 47/I-88 Interchange Improvements

Total Tons Stored: Total Tons Sequestered (Annually):

Crop Tree Management. How to help your forest grow high quality timber by giving your trees ample room to grow. Paul Bane IDNR Forester

Appendix B: Site Index Curves for Selected Tree Species. Interpreting Site Index Curves

An Analysis of Environmental Benefits for Canfield Fairground Trees

Page 1. 1 An excerpt from the Executive Summary of Urban Trees and Forests of the Chicago Region written collaboratively by

STANDARD FOR TREE PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION. Definition

APPENDIX 2 -- EASTERN U.S. SITE-TREE SELECTION CRITERIA AND FIA FOREST TYPE ALGORITHM FOR THE U.S. EASTERN U.S. SITE-TREE SELECTION CRITERIA

Total Tons Stored: Total Tons Sequestered (Annually):

The Greening of Detroit

2015 Wisconsin Envirothon KEY Forestry Exam

The Forest For the Trees: The Value of Community Forest Master Planning. Lee Mueller

STRATUM Technology Showcase

2017 Regional Envirothon

Software for Sustainable Landscapes

Energy, Climate Change, Air Quality and Urban Greening

Using i-tree to Estimate Environmental Services. Eric Kuehler Technology Transfer Specialist USDA Forest Service

Wildlife Habitat & Forest Resource Management Plan. Hickory Hills Park and Casey s Paha

South Dakota s Forest Resources in 2005

An Analysis of Tree Benefits for Ohio Statehouse Grounds

ADVANCING INDIVIDUAL TREE BIOMASS PREDICTION: ASSESSMENT AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE COMPONENT RATIO METHOD

Characteristics of Five Climax Stands in New Hampshire

ANALYZING REGIONAL FIA DATA IN THE ARCVIEW GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM 1

Introduction. Plot Methods

Minnesota Forestry Research Notes Published by the Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul

The Status of Timber Resources in the North Central United States

Adapting Forestry Programs for Climate Change

Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the Unit Manager, GWINN MANAGEMENT UNIT, for certain timber on the following described lands:

i-tree User Group Meeting 2011 Partners in Community Forestry Conference

ARTICLE X LANDSCAPE AND TREE CONSERVATION REGULATIONS. URBAN FOREST CONSERVATION Division 51A

Christopher M. Oswalt Forest Inventory & Analysis Factsheet

Summary of Tree Valuation Based on CTLA Approach

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan. What will you do with your woodland? Some landowners choose to let nature take its course.

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan

FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN For the PINNEY-PURDUE AG. CENTER WOODLAND

Transcription:

Assessment of the Benefits of Ecosystem Restoration with i-tree Eco Jason Henning, The Davey Institute and US Forest Service Philadelphia Urban Field Station

Talk Outline What is i-tree? What does i-tree Eco do? Example Applications Questions & Answers

i-tree Putting USFS Urban Forest science into the hands of users Credible, USDA FS peerreviewed tools Public domain software Accessible Continuously improved www.itreetools.org

Benefit Based Approach Strategic Management & Advocacy Ecosystem Services Comprehensive Value Structure

i-tree Suite of Software www.itreetools.org

Assessing Urban Tree Populations i-tree Eco assesses: Structure Function Energy Air pollution Carbon Avoided runoff Value ($) Management needs Pest risk Tree health Exotic/invasive spp.

How does i-tree Eco work? 1. Design Project Determine what benefits you want to estimate Standard metrics Optional metrics Define area of interest 2. Define Inventory Method 3. Collect Field Data Sample plots (recommend 200, 1/10 th acre for urban areas) Complete inventory (for small areas) Web-enabled mobile device, PDA, or paper data sheets Measure variables DBH, height, crown base, crown width, crown light exposure, condition Submit data for processing

Example restoration applications 1. Establish baseline comparisons Using i-tree Eco to predict the benefits associated with existing tree populations 2. Estimate benefits of urban proposals Examine the benefits associated with projects in urban areas

1. Establish baseline comparisons Monitor natural areas in Three Rivers Park District 27,000 acres of parks and trails Assess current structure of the forest resource Estimate benefits associated with resource Use a plot based i-tree Eco project

1. Establish baseline comparisons Summary of forest structure Species distribution Diameter distribution Species origin Species importance Species diversity Tree condition Leaf area Biomass Etc. Summary by species Summary by land cover types Species Name Percent Percent Leaf Importance Population Area Value Sugar maple 27.9 31.7 59.6 Eastern hophornbeam 17.4 9.4 26.8 American elm 10 7.9 17.9 Northern red oak 5 12 17 American basswood 6.4 10 16.4 Green ash 6.4 6.9 13.4 European buckthorn 9.2 3.2 12.4 Boxelder 4.7 4.4 9.1 Bur oak 1.3 4.1 5.4 White oak 1.1 3.3 4.4 Figure Table 1. 1. Tree Most species important composition species in in Three Rivers Parks District Figure 3. Percent of tree population by diameter class Figure (DBH=stem 4. Percent diameter of live at trees 4.5 feet) by species origin

1. Establish baseline comparisons Summary of forest benefits Air pollution removal By species Monthly Hourly Carbon sequestration Carbon storage Oxygen production Avoided run-off VOC production $ value of ecosystem services Etc. Species Oxygen (tons) Net Carbon Leaf Area Sequestration Number of trees (square miles) (tons/yr) Sugar maple 12,793.07 4,797.40 1,085,515.00 31.97 Northern red oak 7,220.84 2,707.82 194,573.00 12.06 Green ash 2,210.09 828.78 250,897.00 6.99 Boxelder 2,183.78 818.92 184,333.00 4.42 Bur oak 2,063.97 773.99 51,204.00 4.16 Eastern hophornbeam 1,848.86 693.32 675,887.00 9.51 American basswood 1,642.27 615.85 250,897.00 10.06 European buckthorn 1,559.84 584.94 358,425.00 3.19 Bigtooth aspen 1,199.37 449.77 66,565.00 2.18 American elm 1,069.42 401.03 389,147.00 7.95 White oak 612.65 229.74 40,963.00 3.37 Black ash 531.55 199.33 35,842.00 1.96 Black cherry 366.11 137.29 92,166.00 0.51 Bitternut hickory 361.91 135.72 40,963.00 0.6 Slippery elm Figure 7. Carbon Figure 255.24 sequestration 6. Pollution 95.71 and removal value (bars) for 56,324.00 species and associated with 0.67 greatest overall value carbon (points) sequestration for trees in in Three Three Rivers Rivers Parks Northern hackberry 227.22 85.21 30,722.00 Parks 0.43 District District. Pollution removal and value for PM10 Button bush 114.7 43.01 5,120.00 0.42 excludes PM2.5 removal and value. Quaking aspen 87.3 32.74 15,361.00 0.07 Siberian elm 53.44 20.04 10,241.00 0.13 Common chokecherry 31.66 11.87 5,120.00 0.02

2. Benefits of Urban Projects Phoenix park in Camden, NJ Restore riverside marsh Provide access to waterfront Involves planting 56 trees

2. Benefits of Urban projects Method: Create a list of mature trees of desired species (e.g. DBH 10-20 inches) Predict possible tree characteristics (i.e. crown parameters) Import the data to i-tree Eco and predict benefits. Results: Structural/replacement value of $90,000 Storing 10 tons of carbon Sequestering an additional 1,200 lbs of C/yr Filtering 45 lbs of pollution from air each year EPA estimated value of $620/yr Preventing 5,500 gallons of rainfall from becoming runoff each year

Summary: What can i-tree do for you? Provide estimates of the value of restoration Evaluate different restoration scenarios Monitor restoration projects and estimate changes in benefits Provide documentation to support restoration proposals and projects No, seriously, What can i-tree do for you?

Thank You Questions Visit www.itreetools.org i-tree Technical Support: info@itreetools.org Jason.Henning@davey.com