EFFECT OF DIFFERENT STRATEGIES OF MANAGEMENT OF ELEPHANTGRASS ON PASTURE AVAILABILITY AND MILK YIELD OF CROSSBRED HOLSTEIN X ZEBU COWS.

Similar documents
PREDICTION OF DRY MATTER INTAKE BASED ON RUMINAL DEGRADATION FROM MILKING COWS GRAZING COAST-CROSS GRASS , CNPq scholarship.

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ENERGY ON GROWTH OF GRAZING AND DRYLOT FED HOLSTEIN HEIFERS. L.P. Novaes¹ and C.E. Polan²

ANIMAL PERFORMANCE IN PASTURES OF Panicum maximum cv. IPR 86 FERTILIZED WITH NITROGEN. A. de Morais 5. Abstract

IMPACT OF INCREASING NITROGEN FERTILIZER RATES UPON AN IRRIGATED TANZANIA GRASS PASTURE. 1. DRY MATTER YIELD

Grazing time and milk production of crossbred cows in a rotational area of Elephant grass and Tanzania grass*

INGESTIVE BEHAVIOR OF BEEF CATTLE FED EITHER PROTEIN OR ENERGY SUPPLEMENTS UNDER A ROTATIONAL GRAZING SYSTEM. 1

Comparative Efficiency of Autumn and Spring Calving for Pasture-based Dairy Systems

Integrating the Use of Spring- and Fall-Calving Beef Cows in a Year-round Grazing System (A Progress Report)

Results of Organic Dairy Economic Survey. V.E. Cabrera University of Wisconsin-Madison Dairy Science

The effect of pasture allowance on the performance of growing dairy heifers

Forage mass and stocking rate of elephant grass pastures managed under agroecological and conventional systems

Y. Kawamoto 1, T, Namihira 1,Y. Imura 1 and M. Nagano 2. Japan; 2 College of Bioresources Science, Nihon University, , Kanagawa, Japan

AGRONOMIC EVALUATION OF ALFALFA CULTIVARS IN RIO GRANDE DO SUL, BRASIL. (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brasil,

METHANE EMISSION FROM GRAZING DAIRY CATTLE IN TROPICAL BRAZIL: MITIGATION BY IMPROVING PRODUCTION

Benefits of Raising Heifers on Pasture

E conomic Favorability of Feeding

ESTABLISHMENT OF TANZANIA GRASS PASTURE USING MILLET AS A COMPANION CROP. Abstract

KBS research on Complementary Forages for Pasture Systems

Protocol for Study: Effect of feeding Moringa oleifera leaves and green stems to dairy cows on milk production and composition

Pasture Stick. Plate Meter. Estimating Dry Matter Intake. C-Dax Pasture Meter 3/31/2014

HIGH YIELDING AND DISEASE RESISTANT ELEPHANT GRASS SUITABLE FOR INTENSIVE SMALLHOLDER DAIRY FARMERS IN KENYA. A.B. Orodho

Low Input Dairying Challenges and Opportunities Sinclair Mayne, AFBI. 26 January, 2016 Novotel,Bristol

PERFORMANCE OF DAIRY CATTLE UNDER TWO DIFFERENT FEEDING SYSTEMS, AS PRACTICED IN KIAMBU AND NYANDARUA DISTRICTS OF CENTRAL KENYA

Integration of Pasturing Systems for Cattle Finishing Programs: A Progress Report

Spring Rotation Planner

Effects of Creep Supplementation While Grazing Improved Irrigated Pastures

Application of Lineweaver Burk data transformation to explain animal and plant performance as a function of nutrient supply

Forage Systems for Dairy Grazing. Robert Kallenbach University of Missouri

Livestock Nutrition & Grazing Management

Resilient milk production systems for an expanding Irish dairy industry post 2015

Effects of Supplemental Undegradable Protein on the Performance of Fall-Calving Cows Grazing Dormant Native Range

Tools for managing g pasture

INTEGRATING PASTURES INTO THE TRADITIONAL SLASH-AND-BURN CYCLE IN NORTHEASTERN PARÁ, BRAZIL. Göttingen, Germany. Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

Comparison of Weaning System on Cow-Calf Performance and Intake

Elephant grass response to amino-acid synthesis inhibitor herbicides

SPATIAL AND TIME DISTRIBUTION OF DAIRY CATTLE MANURE IN AN INTENSIVE PASTURE SYSTEM. Abstract

Regular estimates of paddock pasture mass can improve profitability on New Zealand dairy farms

Managing to Get More Milk and Profit from Pasture Lawrence D. Muller Pennsylvania State University

KBS research on Complementary Forages for Pasture Systems

DETERMINANTS OF SMALLHOLDER MILK PRODUCTION EXPANSION IN FOUR BRAZILIAN REGIONS

Animal and Forage Interactions in Beef Systems

Forage-Livestock Research Progress Report. Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Overton. Research Center Technical Report

Economics of Grain Supplementation for Organic Dairy Cows

38 Trop Anim Prod :1

Guidelines and tools to get the most from grazing in Ireland

Dry Matter Intake and Manure Production for Management Intensively Grazed Dairy Cattle

PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER REQUIREMENTS FOR TEMPERATE DAIRY PASTURES AND MILK PRODUCTION IN SOUTH EASTERN AUSTRALIA

Drying-off thinner cows earlier in late lactation is it beneficial?

06/02/2017 A PROFITABLE CROSS CALVE REARING AND FINISHING SYSTEM ON PASTURE. Introduction

The Effect of Winter Feed Levels on Steer Production

Resilient milk production systems for an expanding Irish dairy industry post 2015

This article was presented on June 26, 1996 at the Purdue Hay Day.

Grazing System Effects on Enteric Methane Emissions from Cows in Southern Iowa Pastures

Forage Value of Cover Crops. Jim Paulson Nutritionist and Forage Specialist Fieldstone Consulting

Impact of changes in nitrogen and energy inputs at farm level. Léon Šebek. Efficiency and Environmental impact

Grazing Wheat Did Not Reduce Beef Cow Pregnancy Rates

Maximizing health and performance of dairy calves and heifers

Tropentag 2007 University of Kassel-Witzenhausen and University of Göttingen, October 9-11, 2007

What stocking rate for my farm? Maximising milk production from pasture

Update on Southwest Center Dairy Research MU Pasture-based Dairy Team

Joint IGFA/Teagasc Nutrition Event 27 th June Resilient farming systems for an expanding Irish dairy industry

PRODUCTION AND QUALITY OF Paspalum FORAGE IN STATE OF SÃO PAULO 1. L.A.R. Batista, A. Regitano Neto and R. Godoy

Your cattle need Rumensin

The Importance of Maintaining Proper Grazing Height. Sarah Kenyon, Ph.D. University of Missouri Extension

Winter Grazing Systems for Gestating Ewes

Evaluation of production efficiencies among primiparous suckler cows of diverse genotype at pasture

Managing rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) cv. Callide to improve diet quality. 1. Effects of age of regrowth, strip grazing and mulching

Approximate stocking rates to maintain vegetation cover for rangeland and pastures in the San Francisco bay area

INFLUENCE OF SWARD HEIGHT, CONCENTRATE SUPPLEMENTATION AND SEASON ON GRAZING ACTIVITY OF BEEF COWS

Measure, Monitor & Manage. The 3 M s of Pasture Management Ted Probert University of Missouri Dairy Specialist

Using a Grazing Stick for Pasture Management

Intensified Cow/Calf Production Systems in the Southern Great Plains

Article Title: Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cattle Raising in Brazil

Making Livestock Decisions in Dry Times

Introduction to Management-intensive Grazing

Efficiency of calf production of cows from two genetic groups

Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists

Efficient use of grazed herbage by dairy cows

TECA. Zero-grazing of improved cattle breeds using drought tolerant fodder in Uganda. TECHNOLOGIES and PRACTICES for SMALL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS

Lincoln University Dairy Farm Farm Walk notes

HEIFER REARING IN THE TROPICS. J. Ugarte

Forage maize seminar UCD Lyons Estate Research Farm Forage Maize Research Programme update

Heat stress in ruminant production : Effects of heat stress, how to alleviate

Pasture Management. Mark Landefeld OSU ANR Educator Monroe County, Buckeye Hills EERA

Winter Feeding & Management

2017 Pasture Productivity Trial

Heifer rearing cost: Critical control points

Getting Stocking Rates Right & Integrating the Outside Block

California s Rangelands. Annual Grassland Dominated Systems

Impact of climate change on the livestock component of mixed farming systems

Developing a Forage Management Strategy to Maximize Fall and Winter Grazing

AMMONIA LOSSES BY VOLATILIZATION FROM COASTCROSS PASTURE FERTILIZED WITH TWO NITROGEN SOURCES 1. da Silva 3. Abstract

Beef economics = Heifer management

National Organic Program (NOP) Access to Pasture (Livestock)

IMPROVING PASTURES BY RENOVATION Ed Ballard,Retired Animal Systems Educator University of Illinois Extension

Pasture Monitoring. Charles Fletcher Edgewood Dairy Purdy, Missouri

THE EFFECTS OF GRAZING SYSTEM AND EARLY WEANING ON PRODUCTIVITY OF FALL CALVING COWS IN OKLAHOMA

3.3 Denmark (Mette Vaarst, Anne Braad Kudahl)

Milk Production, Cow Traffic and Milking Duration at Different Milking Frequencies in an Automated Milking System Integrated with Grazing

Determining the costs and revenues for dairy cattle

Transcription:

ID#22-36 EFFECT OF DIFFERENT STRATEGIES OF MANAGEMENT OF ELEPHANTGRASS ON PASTURE AVAILABILITY AND MILK YIELD OF CROSSBRED HOLSTEIN X ZEBU COWS Fermino Deresz Embrapa - National Dairy Cattle Research Center - Rua Eugênio do Nascimento, 610 - Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil, 36038-330. CNPq Fellowship Abstract The trial was done to study different strategies of pasture management on milk production of cows grazing Elephantgrass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum.). The treatments were: Elephantgrass with 30 days of resting and fertilized monthly (30MF), fertilized every two months (30BF). Elephantgrass with 45 days of resting and a stubble height of 90-100 cm (45HS) or a stubble height of 40-50 cm (45LS). The stubble height for treatments 30MF and 30BF was 90-100 cm. The study was done using six crossbred Holstein x Zebu cows/treatment, with 100 days of lactation, on average. The experimental design was a completely randomized block design with two replication. The stocking rate was 4.5 cows/ha and no concentrate was fed. The pasture was fertilized with 200 kg/ha/year of N and K 2 O. It was also applied 40 kg/ha/year of P 2 O 5 and 1,000 kg/ha/year of dolomitic limestone. The average fat corrected (4%) milk yield was 10.3, 10.5, 9.3 and 9.2 kg/cow/day for treatments 30MF, 30BF, 45HS and 45LS, respectively. There were no effects (P>0.05) of stubble height or fertilization frequency, but the treatments with 30-day resting produced more (P<0.05) milk than those grazing at 45-day resting (10.4 versus 9.3). The overall average dry matter availability during the period was 1,652, 1,465, 1,821 and 1,707 kg/ha/cycle for the

treatments 30MF, 30BF, 45HS and 45LS, respectively, and there was no treatment difference (P>0.05). Keywords: Crossbred milking cows, Pennisetum purpureum Schum., resting period, rotational grazing, stubble height. Introduction Elephantgrass (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum.) is a high yielding tropical forage, in general, well adapted to the Brazilian conditions, since it is cropped from North to South of Brazil. It is possible to get 15,000 kg/ha of milk during the 180 days of the rainy season (Deresz, 1994) using crossbred Holstein x Zebu cows. Deresz et al. (1994) reported daily average milk yield of 12 to 14 kg with crossbred Holstein x Zebu cows, grazing Elephantgrass during the rainy season, without concentrate supplementation. In this case Elephantgrass pasture was fertilized with 200 kg/ha of N and K 2 O, during the rainy season. The resting period is an important factor in relation to the pasture management, since it interferes with the pasture quality, quantity, number of paddocks and milk yield response as reported by Deresz et al. (1994). The literature lacks information about the effect of different resting periods on milk yield on Elephantgrass pasture. However, Aroeira et al. (1999) found no effect of 30 versus 45 days resting period on milk yield or feed intake on Elephantgrass rotationally managed pasture, but there was significant effect on dry matter availability in favor of 45 days resting period. The objective of this study was to compare 30-versus 45-day resting, two stubble height with 45 days resting and monthly and bimonthly fertilization with 30 days resting on dry matter availability and milk yield. Material and Methods The study was carried out during the rainy season of 1995, using an area of Elephantgrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.) that have been utilized in grazing trials since

1988, annually fertilized with 200 kg/ha/year of N and K 2 0. The treatments were: Elephantgrass with 30 days of resting and fertilized monthly (30MF) or bimonthly (30BF). Elephantgrass with 45 days of resting and a stubble height of 90-100 cm (45HS) or 40-50 cm (45LS). The stubble height for 30MF and 30BF was 90-100 cm. The study was conducted using Holstein x Zebu cows, with 100 days of lactation, on average. The cows were allotted to the treatments in a completely randomized block design, based on body weight and milk yield. There was two area replication and three cows/replication. The stoking rate was 4.5 cows/ha and no concentrate was fed. Each paddock was grazed for three days. The pasture was fertilized with 200 kg/ha/year of N and K 2 O, divided in three or six applications (30BF and 30MF) and after each grazing cycle for the (45HS and 45LS). It was also applied 40 kg/ha/year of P 2 O 5 and 1,000 kg/ha/year of dolomitic limestone. The stubble heights for all the treatments were established by hand cuttings the residue a day after the cows left each grazed paddock. The hand cuttings started on November 19 th of 1994 and finished on January 5 th of 1995. However, because of a short dry period observed in January the experiment started on February 5 th. Most of the cows calved in October- November of 1994. The forage dry matter availability was estimated monthly, one day before grazing period, using the hand plucked method observing the stubble height of each paddock. It was chosen a tall and a short tuft, in two places of each replication. To get the estimation of dry matter yield an area of 100 m 2 was used to obtain the number of tufts of each height to be able to estimate the dry matter yield, assuming that the tall tufts represented 50 %. A sample of this material was used to determine the chemical composition of forage. The experiment finished on May 31, the beginning of the dry season of the year. Results and Discussion

The need to established the stubble heights (hand cuttings) in treatments was one of the reasons of delaying the beginning of the trial. In treatments 45HS and 45LS there was necessity to cut the stubble for every grazing cycle since the cows were not able to maintain the planned stubble heights probably due to the selectivity of grazing. Also the pasture grew to above 2 m high during each cycle especially in treatment 45LS, so the stubble was always higher than 40-50 cm high. The same problem with high stubble occurred in treatment 45HS but in a less severe form. In treatments 30MF and 30BF with stubble heights of 90-100 cm, rarely, there was necessity to adjust it and when it was necessary to do so, it was done only in small spots inside the paddocks. The overall average dry matter availability during the rainy season was 1.652, 1.465, 1.821 and 1.707 kg/ha/cycle for treatments 30MF, 30BF, 45HS and 45LS, respectively (Table 1). There was no treatment effect (P>0.05) for the dry matter availability. The dry matter availability was higher for the 30MF and 30BF than for 45HS and 45LS treatments during January and February and lower during March and April, respectively. The reason for this may be related to the hand cutting management, adopted for all the treatments in the beginning of the trial, and for every grazing cycle on the 45LS treatment, since the stubble height was always higher than that planned. The average dry matter availability for the intire period probably was lower than normal values and the reason could be related to the short drought period occurred in January of 1995. However Aroeira et al. (1999) found similar values for Elephantgrass pasture grazed with 30 or 45 days of resting during the rainy season, in the same area, but in different years. The average chemical composition of the forage hand plucked during the rainy season was 15.8, 15.9, 15.4 and 15.8 % of dry matter and 15.1, 14.5, 14.9 and 14.7 % of CP and 66.5, 67.1, 67.2 and 66.4 % of NDF, for the 30MF, 30BF, 45HS and 45LS treatments, respectively.

The overall average fat corrected (4 %) milk yield was 10.3, 10.5, 9.3 and 9.2 kg/cow/day for treatments 30MF, 30BF, 45HS and 45LS, respectively. There were no effects (P>0.05) of stubble heights or fertilization frequency, but the treatments with 30-day of resting or regrowth produced more (P<0.05) milk than those grazing at 45-day resting (10.4 versus 9.3 kg/cow/day). Similar results were observed by Deresz et al. (1994). However, Aroeira et al. (1999) observed no milk yield difference between 30 versus 45 days resting on Elephangrass pasture. Average 4% fat corrected milk yield in a weekly basis are shown in Figure 1. In conclusion, cows grazing Elephantgrass managed with 45-day resting produced less milk than cows grazing Elephantgrass with 30 days resting. There was no milk yield difference between the monthly and bimonthly fertilized treatments, neither between the 45 high stubble and 45 low stubble treatments.

References Aroeira, L.J.M., Lopes F.C.F., Deresz F., Verneque R.S., Dayrell M.S., Matos, L.L.de, Maldonado-Vasques H. and Vittori A. (1999). Pasture availability and dry matter intake of lactating cows grazing elephant grass (Penissetum purpureum, Schum.). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 78:313-324. Deresz, F., Cóser A.C., Martins C.E., Botrel M.de A., Aroeira L.J.M., Vasquez H.M. and Matos, L.L.de. (1994). Utilização do capim-elefante (Pennisetum purpureum, Schum.) para a produção de leite. In: Simpósio Brasileiro de Forrageiras e Pastagens, Campinas. Anais... Campinas-SP: CBNA, p.183-199. Deresz, F. (1994). Manejo de pastagem de capim-elefante para produção de leite e carne. In: SIMPÓSIO SOBRE CAPIM-ELEFANTE, 2. Juiz de Fora. Anais. Coronel Pacheco, MG: Embrapa Gado de Leite, p.116-137. Table 1 - Average dry matter availability (kg/ha) of Elephantgrass pasture managed with different resting periods during the rainy season of 1995. Months Treatments 30MF 30BF 45HS 45LS January 1,282 1,091 1,153 881 February 2,041 1,921 1,783 1,561 March 1,557 1,521 2,024 2,333 April 1,727 1,327 2,324 2,052 Standard error Mean 1,652 1,465 1,821 1,707 163.1

4% FCM (kg/cow/day) 13,5 12,5 11,5 10,5 9,5 8,5 7,5 6,5 30MF 30BF 45HS 45LS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Weeks Figure 1 - Milk yield (4% fat corrected) on Elephantgrass pasture managed with different resting periods during the rainy season of 1995.