Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

Similar documents
Fantom: A Radio-Opaque Stent-Like BRS With Improved Expansion Characteristics

Company Update. 28 May REVA Medical, Inc.

Dr. Alexandre Abizaid Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Sao Paulo, Brazil

Dr. Alexandre Abizaid Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Sao Paulo, Brazil. On behalf of the FANTOM II investigators

BIOABSORBABLE POLYMER STENTS: IS THE FUTURE?

Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations

Approaching Commercialization

REVA Medical. Corporate Presentation November REVA Medical REVA Medical CC Rev. B

Approaching Commercialization

REVA Medical. Corporate Presentation January REVA Medical CC Rev. D REVA Medical.

For personal use only

For personal use only

Fernando Alfonso MD, PhD, FESC Hospital Universitario La Princesa Madrid. Spain. On Behalf of the RIBS VI Investigators

My Experience with BioMime SES & merit-v Randomized Clinical Trial Update

The Next Generation of Stents for the Lower Extremity: What s on the Horizon?

Cre8 TM BTK polymer-free DES technology: the Activ8 clinical trial

Bioresorbable Scaffold Program Update. Alexandre Abizaid, MD, PhD, FACC Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Sao Paulo, Brazil

NEUROVASCULAR CARDIAC RHYTHM MANAGEMENT ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY INTERVENTIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY GYNECOLOGY UROLOGY

Abbott Vascular Inc. - Product Pipeline Analysis, 2016 Update

Bioabsorbable Stents - Medical Devices Pipeline Assessment, 2015

For personal use only

LDDR Geneva, Switzerland February 04, Lewis B. Schwartz, M.D., F.A.C.S.

For personal use only

REVA Medical. Corporate Presentation November REVA Medical REVA Medical CC Rev. C

Responsibilities of Investigators for Clinical Trials from Consent to Safety Reporting

TOBA II and TOBA III Clinical Programme Updates

The Balance of Safety, Efficacy, and Reasonable Assurance in DES An FDA View

Bioresorbable Stent Implantation for Tibial Disease

Coronary Stent Innovation: EPC Capture

For personal use only

Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD

For personal use only

President St. Joseph s Heart and Vascular Institute Professor of Medicine Emeritus Emory University

Novel BioResorbable Vascular Platforms from India

REVA Medical. Corporate Presentation January REVA Medical 0 REVA Medical. CC Rev J

Case studies in the design, analysis and interpretation of non-inferiority trials

Symposium Biotronik High-Tech DRug Eluting Absorbable Metal Stent: dreaming the future! Didier Tchétché. Clinique Pasteur.

SAFE STEMI for Seniors: a PASSION proof of concept study

The RIBS IV Clinical Trial

REVA Medical. Corporate Presentation November REVA Medical CC Rev. I REVA Medical.

The Importance of Vessel Preparation

Clinical evaluation of the swirling flow stent: the MIMICS experience

REVA s Bioresorbable Scaffold Program Update. Alexandre Abizaid, MD, PhD, FACC Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia Sao Paulo, Brazil

Bioabsorbable Stents (BAS) - Medical Devices Pipeline Assessment, 2017

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Bioabsorbable Stents (BAS) - Medical Devices Pipeline Assessment, 2016

Asia (Singapore) as a Medtech Hub: Case Study of Biosensors

LUTONIX DCB Interim 24 Month Outcomes from Global BTK Registry

Bioabsorbable Stents. The Ideal Scaffold properties and kinetics. Jonathan Hill King s College Hospital King s Health Partners

Prestige Pilot: Phoenix atherectomy and Stellarex DCB in BTK interventions. Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC

SYNERGYTM. Everolimus-Eluting Platinum Chromium Coronary Stent System

Current developments in SFA treatment and future opportunities: The Alvimedica DES project

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report for Study CV Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier

Piloting the National Cardiovascular Research Infrastructure: The SAFE-PCI for Women Trial

How to Improve Stenting Results in Bifurcations? Platform and technique

Rationale and Design of the Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of 2 nd Generation BuMA DES in Europe

Clinical Trials and Medical Device Innovation in the US New Policies and Trends

Atherectomy as Primary Therapy for Lower Extremity Artery Disease: What will Be its Role in the Drug-Eluting Era

Bivalirudin (Angiomax ) vs. Heparin during Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Which is Better and How to Decide?

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

"Insight Heart" is also available at potential studies identified on PubMed and titles reviewed for possible retrieval

Biosensors International Group. 28 th Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference January 2010

Evolution of Intravascular Technology for Coronary Artery Disease Treatment

Nuts & Bolts of Clinical Trials, DSMBs, Event Committees, Core Labs and Data Standards

THE MICHELANGELO OASIS 5 PROGRAM. MichelAngelo : The Creation of Man (Fragment of the Sistine Chapel ceiling- Detail) ( )

Current Issues in Device Development and Approval An Academic Perspec7ve

Gary Maharaj. Tim Arens FEBRUARY President and CEO

Antithrombotic Treatment of Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

Some key multiplicity questions on primary and secondary endpoints of RCCTs and possible answers

Regulatory Science: FDA Paths Forward With Real World Evidence Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, FACC

Case Report Case Report of First Angiography-Based On-Line FFR Assessment during Coronary Catheterization

The evolution of stent design for chronic iliac vein obstruction

Peripheral Vascular Stents for the Lower Extremity

Decide, guide, treat and confirm: The Philips Volcano CLI solution

Perspective on initial Limflow experience in the US. Peter A. Schneider, MD Kaiser Foundation Hospital Honolulu, Hawaii

For personal use only

STUDY OF STENT DEFORMATION AND STRESS DEVELOPED AT DIFFERENT STENT DEPLOYMENT PRESSURES

Interventional Cardiology Advisory Group Meeting held 17 February (minutes for web publishing)

Which is the best anticoagulant during primary PCI (p-pci) for STEMI?

Cost-effectiveness of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in non-st-elevation acute coronary syndrome in Canada (OASIS-5)

Bridging Innovation and Evaluation Internationally

Manual of Interventional Cardiology

Comparative Effectiveness and the United States Healthcare System: Success, Failure and Politics

Yukon Choice 4 DES Translumina - Allows natural healing

INNOVATIONS IN BIORESORBABLE STENTS BRS at the crossroad: technological development to reduce complications. Patrick W. Serruys

Postmarket Safety Surveillance: A Medical Device Perspective

OR NOT TO OUTSOURCE. Omar Merhi, PhD Director, Clinical Research Operations ABIOMED, INC.

Non-Inferiority Trials: What are they and why are they so difficult?

Tailoring best practices for the evaluation of endpoints in clinical device trials

Health Status Benefits of Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk

Navifocus WR IVUS is the promising imaging device for navigating the guide-wire into true lumen during CTO intervention: initial clinical experience

Bioabsorbable metal stents: properties, modeling and open questions

Optical Fiber Sensors for Biomedical Applications

A Coordinated Registry Network Based on the Vascular Quality Initiative: VISION. Vascular Implant Surveillance & Interventional Outcomes Network

WARNING LETTER VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS. an investigator from the FDA

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Design and Discovery of Resorbable Polymers for Coronary Stents

Investigator Guide Reporting of Unanticipated Problems to the IRB

Contrarian Play in Cardiology:

Quality Control in Clinical Trials Blinding, Clinical Event Committees, Core Labs, and Data Standards

Transcription:

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G. Ellis MD Dean J. Kereiakes MD and Gregg W. Stone MD for the ABSORB III Investigators NCT01751906

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company Consultant and research funding Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic

Background The BVS provides early drug delivery and mechanical support similar to metallic DES, followed by complete bioresorption with recovery of vascular structure and function, and is intended to reduce late MACE d/t the irritant effect of metallic stents which has been associated with a 2%/yr risk from year 1 onward. Despite expected excess in early thrombotic events d/t larger device struts, the ABSORB III trial met its primary outcome measure at 1 year (non-inferiority of TLF; cardiac death, TVMI or ID-TLR) in 2,008 patients with CAD randomized 2:1 to the BVS vs. CoCr-EES Clinical outcomes through 3 years, the approximate time of complete scaffold bioresorption, have not previously been reported from the ABSORB III trial

Key Patient Eligibility Criteria >18 years old Evidence of myocardial ischemia (stable/unstable/postinfarction angina or silent ischemia) No elevation of CK-MB 1 or 2 de novo target lesions in up to 2 native coronary arteries (max 1 lesion per artery) Diameter stenosis 50% and <100% with TIMI flow 1 If <70%, abnormal functional test (including FFR 0.80), unstable angina or post-infarct angina RVD 2.50 mm and 3.75 mm (site-determined) Lesion length 24 mm (site-determined)

Study Flow and Follow-up Randomized 2:1 N=2008 (ITT) ABSORB N=1322 N=686 ABSORB N=1312 ABSORB N=1296 ABSORB N=1276 N=4 lost to follow-up N=6 withdrew consent 1-Year Follow-up 2-Year Follow-up N=6 lost to follow-up N=3 withdrew consent 99.2% Complete 98.7% Complete N=10 lost to follow-up N=6 withdrew consent N=4 lost to follow-up N=2 withdrew consent 98.0% Complete 97.8% Complete N=14 lost to follow-up N=2 withdrew consent N=3 withdrawn by physician/site N=1 other 3-Year Follow-up N=8 lost to follow-up N=1 withdrew consent N=1 withdrawn by physician/site 96.5% Complete 96.4% Complete N=677 N=671 N=661

Target lesion failure (%) Target Lesion Failure 30% 25% 20% HR [95% CI] = 1.31 [0.99, 1.73] p = 0.056 15% 10% 7.8% 11.0% 13.4% 10.4% 5% 6.2% 8.1% No. at Risk: 0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 1322 686 Time Post Procedure (Months) 1189 630 1135 604 1074 577 The 3-year window includes follow-up through 37 months

3-Year Clinical Events (N=1322) (N=686) HR (95%CI) P value All Death 3.1% (40) 3.4% (23) 0.90 [0.54, 1.51] 0.70 - Cardiac Death 1.4% (18) 1.2% (8) 1.17 [0.51, 2.69] 0.71 All MI 10.2% (132) 7.6% (51) 1.36 [0.98, 1.88] 0.061 - TV-MI 8.6% (112) 5.9% (40) 1.47 [1.02, 2.11] 0.03 - Related to device thrombosis - Unrelated to device thrombosis 1.9% (25) 0.6% (4) 3.26 [1.13, 9.35] 0.02 6.8% (88) 5.3% (36) 1.28 [0.87, 1.88] 0.21 Note: The 3-year window includes follow-up through 37 months

Device thrombosis (%) Device Thrombosis 5% 4% 3% HR [95% CI] = 3.12 [1.21, 8.05] p = 0.01 2% 1.5% 1.8% 2.3% 1% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% No. at Risk: 0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 1322 686 Time Post Procedure (Months) 1264 665 1242 647 1197 630 The 3-year window includes follow-up through 37 months

Device thrombosis %) Device Thrombosis: Landmark Analysis Stratified by Vessel Size RVD <2.25 mm RVD 2.25 mm 10% 8% 0 1 Year HR [95% CI] = 3.07 [0.68,13.85] p=0.12 1 3 Years p=0.47 10% 8% 0 1 Year HR [95% CI] = 1.53 [0.42,5.67] p=0.52 1 3 Years p=0.03 6% 6% 4% 4.6% 4% No. at Risk: 2% 0% 1.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 242 133 Time Post Procedure (Months) 224 129 229 121 223 115 2% 0% 0.8% 0.5% 0.9% 0.0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 1074 549 Time Post Procedure (Months) 1044 537 1023 528 984 517

Limitations ABSORB III enrolled patients with stable ischemic heart disease and stabilized ACS, and excluded complex lesions is a first generation device and was used for the first time by most operators within this trial The optimal implantation technique was still evolving during the initiation and enrollment of ABSORB III - Detailed analysis of the impact of PSP on outcomes will be presented in the Featured Clinical Research session Tuesday 10/31 at 12:45 pm in Mile High Ballroom 1A-1B

Summary and Conclusions In the large-scale ABSORB III trial, device-related clinical events (TLF) continued to accrue between 1 and 3 years following PCI with both BVS and EES, although to a slightly greater extent with BVS Three-year rates of composite adverse events were increased with BVS compared to EES, driven by greater rates of scaffold thrombosis and TVMI Longer-term clinical follow-up is necessary to determine whether more normal coronary structure and function after complete scaffold bioresorption will result in a favorable late net safety and efficacy profile of BVS compared to permanent metallic DES

ABSORB III 3-Year Publication JACC 2017:on-line

BACK UP SLIDES FOR QUESTIONS

3-Year Clinical Events (N=1322) (N=686) HR (95%CI) P value All revascularization 16.4% (210) 12.7% (85) 1.31 [1.02, 1.68] 0.04 - ID-TVR 11.6% (148) 7.7% (51) 1.54 [1.12, 2.11] 0.01 - All TLR 7.3% (93) 5.9% (39) 1.25 [0.86, 1.81] 0.25 - ID-TLR 7.2% (92) 5.9% (39) 1.23 [0.85, 1.79] 0.27 - Related to device thrombosis - Unrelated to device thrombosis 2.2% (28) 0.7% (5) 2.92 [1.13, 7.55] 0.02 5.2% (66) 5.2% (34) 1.01 [0.67, 1.53] 0.96 Note: The 3-year window includes follow-up through 37 months

Target lesion failure (%) Target Lesion Failure: Stratified by Vessel Size 30% RVD <2.25 mm HR [95% CI] = 1.49 [0.88, 2.52] p = 0.14 30% RVD 2.25 mm HR [95% CI] = 1.26 [0.91, 1.75] p = 0.16 25% 20% 18.4% 20.9% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 12.9% 8.3% 11.6% 14.9% 15% 10% 5% 6.6% 5.7% 9.4% 7.3% 11.8% 9.4% No. at Risk: 0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 242 133 Time Post Procedure (Months) 206 119 193 109 182 101 0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 1074 549 Time Post Procedure (Months) 979 509 938 493 888 474

Device thrombosis %) Device Thrombosis: Stratified by Vessel Size 10% RVD <2.25 mm HR [95% CI] = 3.34 [0.75, 14.91] p = 0.09 10% RVD 2.25 mm HR [95% CI] = 3.08 [0.91, 10.47] p = 0.06 8% 8% 6% 4.6% 4.6% 5.0% 6% 4% 4% No. at Risk: 2% 0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 242 133 1.5% Time Post Procedure (Months) 224 128 1.5% 222 120 216 114 1.5% 2% 0% 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 1074 549 0.8% 0.5% Time Post Procedure (Months) 1036 535 1.2% 0.5% 1016 525 977 514 1.7% 0.5%