Jane Hedges, Manager, Nuclear Waste Program Washington Department of Ecology

Similar documents
Hanford Overview. SITE OWNER US Dept of Energy. SIZE 586 square miles. NEARBY TOWNS Richland, Pasco, total pop ~250,000 WORKFORCE ~11,000

Hanford Site Outlook

DOE Environmental Management Clean Up Focus for FY

Supplemental Treatment Hanford Immobilized Low Activity Waste Discussion National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine

Update on the. Federal Facilities Task Force/ May 28, Assistant Secretary

Analysis of Approaches for Supplemental Treatment of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Printed in the United States of America

THE AMERICAN REINVESTMENT AND RECOVERY ACT: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP OPERATIONS

PROTECTING NORTHWEST STAKEHOLDERS FROM HANFORD S TANK WASTE Suzanne Dahl Washington State Department of Ecology

Overview of Hanford Site Risk Assessment to Support Cleanup Decision Making

WM Symposia AND FY 2013 Budget Overview. David Huizenga Senior Advisor for Environmental Management February

DOE Environmental Management Brief

Washington Closure Hanford: Cleaning up the River Corridor

DOE Environmental Management

RIVER PROTECTION PROJECT WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONCEPT AND APPROACH. M. J. Lawrence, British Nuclear Fuels Ltd., Inc.

Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Mission

Progress on Footprint Reduction at the Hanford Site

EM Program Update. Frank Marcinowski Deputy Assistant Secretary for Waste Management June 4,

EM Transportation Update

Hanford Tank Wastes from Past Production of U.S. Nuclear Weapons: Statutory Authorities and Related Issues

Radioactive Tank Waste from the Past Production of Nuclear Weapons: Background and Issues for Congress

How does the WIPP shutdown Impact New Mexico, Idaho, and South Carolina?

HANFORD S GROUNDWATER/VADOSE ZONE INTEGRATION PROJECT PROTECTING THE COLUMBIA RIVER

Transportation in Environmental Cleanup

Los Alamos National Laboratory Waste Management Program

With this FY 2007 budget request, we are proposing several shifts between program offices with the completion of cleanup.

The Positive Impacts of American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) Funding to the Waste Management Program on Hanford s Plateau Remediation Project

Waste Management Fiscal Year 1998 Progress Report

FFTF DECOMMISSIONING. FFTF Decommissioning Alternative 1: No Action. FFTF Decommissioning Alternative 2: Entombment

HANFORD TANK WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM. T. Z. Smith, S. A. Wiegman U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection

1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Purpose and Scope. M. J. Hartman

Radioactive Waste Determination Process Plan for Waste Management Area C Tank Waste Residuals

Waste Management Idaho Lessons Learned

EM Packaging and Transportation Update

THE WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT: HOW WELL IS ACCELERATED CLEANUP WORKING?

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Tank Farm Remediation Technology Development Project: An Exercise in Technical and Regulatory Collaboration

Hanford Low Activity Waste Historical Overview. David Swanberg February 2018

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. PORTS D&D Project Update Piketon High School January 24, 2017

Analysis of Approaches for Supplemental Treatment of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Applying Lean Concepts to Waste Site Closure 13137

Rocky Flats Closure Project

Office of River Protection

GESTION DES DECHETS RADIOACTIFS AUX USA

CLEANING UP AMERICA S NUCLEAR WEAPONS COMPLEX

Full Focus Needed on Finishing Hanford s Waste Treatment Plant

West Valley Demonstration Project Overview

Savannah River Site Missions, Accomplishments and Funding

Tank Farm Workers. Seattle, Washington

W. T. (Sonny) Goldston Savannah River Nuclear Solutions phone fax

Hanford Site River Corridor Cleanup. K.D. Bazzell U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office 825 Jadwin Avenue, Richland, Washington 99352

WM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

D4 Project Innovations and Challenges. J.C. Fulton Washington Closure Hanford 2620 Fermi Avenue, Richland, Washington 99354, USA

STGWG Open Session with Environmental Management

WM2011 Conference February 27 - March 3, 2011, Phoenix, AZ

WM07 Conference, February 25 March 1, 2007, Tucson, AZ

Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High Level Radioactive Waste

Don J. Moak*, Glen C. Triner**, Lori D. West**, Richard L. Grondin*

Central Plateau Inner Area Cleanup Principles

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Observational Approach to Chromium Site Remediation 13266

WM2015 Conference, March 15-19, 2015, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

1.2.5 Fast Flux Test Facility Deactivation Decision and Record of Decision/Environmental Impact Statement for Deactivation Decision

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona USA. Waste Feed Delivery Planning at Hanford 13232

Brief History of the Hanford Site. Michele S. Gerber, Ph.D.

Hanford Site River Corridor Cleanup Effectiveness of Interim Actions and Transition to Final Actions

Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Disposal of Greater-

PAGE 2 OF 11. History. Savannah River Site Focus. Ongoing Missions

Cleanup at the Los Alamos National Laboratory The Challenges

Transportation Program Overview

Savannah River Site Making Solid Investments for a Sustainable Future

Update on Waste Disposition & Transportation. Intergovernmental Meeting

Emerging Issues With U.S. DOE Prime Contractors

Groundwater Strategy for Hanford: A Contrast in Citizens Vision and Goals With USDOE s and its Partner Tri-Party Agreement Agencies Vision and Goals

Small Business Procurement and Contracting Opportunities with DOE and DOE Prime Contractors

Susan Leckband, Chair Shelley Cimon, Vice Chair

Reprocessing and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management at the Savannah River Site

An Approach to Characterizing and Evaluating Alternatives for the Decommissioning of Sub-Grade Structures at the Plutonium Finishing Plant

Transportation in Environmental Cleanup

Part 2. EVPP 111 Lecture Dr. Largen

DOE ORDER "RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT" SRS & DOE COMPLEX IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES AND COSTS. W.T. Goldston Westinghouse Savannah River Company

WM2013 Conference, February 24 28, 2013, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Collaboration in Long-Term Stewardship at DOE s Hanford Site 13019

History of the Western New York Nuclear Service Center. May 3, 2016

A Summary of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL U.S. Department of Energy. AUDIT REPORT OAI-L September 2017

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

AECL and Radioactive Waste Management

WIPP and Surplus Plutonium

3M Woodbury Disposal Site Proposed cleanup plan for PFCs

Cleanup Progress Summary. Early Action Initiated/Completed. 1 of 5 3/12/2015 9:30 AM

Dr. Ernest Moniz Professor Massachusetts Institute of Technology

WIPP CAPACITY National Academy of Sciences

Radioactive Waste Management (Joint with the Agriculture & Energy Committee)

SURVEYING EXCESS DOE FACILITIES FOR TRANSFER TO DEACTIVATION AND DECOMMISSIONING

Nuclear Issues 5. Decline of Nuclear Power? Three Mile Island Chernobyl Waste Disposal

Nevada National Security Site Industrial Sites Project Closeout 12498

An Unprecedented Marvel of Science, Technology and Engineering

CLOSING ROCKY FLATS BY

($ in Thousands) Governor s Planning Estimates. Governor s Rec. Agency Request

NUCLEAR ENERGY AND WATER USE IN THE COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN

Getting Remediation Done at ORNL

Transcription:

Jane Hedges, Manager, Nuclear Waste Program Washington Department of Ecology National Conference of State Legislatures June 20, 2012

586-square-mile site 2,400 waste management units/areas of concern ~72 square miles of groundwater contaminated above drinking water standards 177 high-level waste tanks buried underground 9 plutonium production nuclear reactors 6 canyon processing buildings 1 sodium-cooled test nuclear reactors 72 radioactive landfills 43 miles of landfill trenches (remaining)

Hanford historical timeline 1940s Building Hanford 1945-1985 Weapons Production Present Cleanup 1990s Decommissioning

Ecology s role at Hanford Keeping people and the environment safe from the dangers of mixed radioactive and chemically hazardous waste by overseeing the U.S. Department of Energy s Hanford cleanup activities.

TPA & regulatory oversight The Tri-Party Agreement was signed in 1989 between Washington, USDOE & EPA. The agreement provides the legal framework for Hanford Site cleanup and schedules. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) and Washington State s Hazardous Waste Management Act govern the management (treatment, storage, and disposal) of hazardous and dangerous wastes to minimize threat to human health and the environment. A state permit issued by Ecology outlines general conditions for the treatment, storage, and disposal of dangerous wastes at the site.

Washington s cleanup priorities Continue progress on groundwater cleanup & protection of Columbia River Support tank retrievals & construction/design of the Waste Treatment Plant Continue soil cleanup on Columbia River corridor Complete Plutonium Finishing Plant demolition work Protecting Washington s air, land, and water is part of Ecology s core mission.

Cleanup timelines Tanks/Waste Treatment Plant* 2019: Complete WTP construction (now 60% done) 2022: Initiate WTP operations 2040: Retrieve all single-shell tanks 2047: Treat all tank waste Groundwater 2024: Complete all groundwater remediation along the Columbia River corridor *New deadlines recently negotiated in 2010 consent decree

Cleanup progress Hanford received nearly $2 billion in American Recovery & Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds in 2009. (Funding ended 9/30/11) Ecology credits USDOE and its contractors for having projects ready to go and making good use of the funds Significant progress was made in areas of groundwater treatment facility construction, Plutonium Finishing Plant deactivation and decontamination, and tank farm infrastructure upgrades Ecology is working closely with the USDOE and EPA to prioritize projects so progress continues Washington has strong support of Congressional delegation for continued cleanup funding

ARRA Accomplishments Richland Office Reduced the cleanup footprint 66% (385 square miles) Completed 3 major groundwater treatment systems Installed 303 groundwater wells and decommissioned 280 old wells and boreholes Demolished 76 facilities Retrieved 2, 602 cubic meters of Transuranic waste from underground storage and shipped 2,121 cubic meters for treatment Remediated 73 waste sites Built 2 major super cells for the landfill disposal facility Removed 130 high hazard radioactive glove boxes from the highest risk building on Hanford Plutonium Finishing Plant

ARRA Accomplishments Office of River Protection Completed $326M worth of Tank Farm Project Upgrades Met all 70+ Recovery Act contract milestones 200,446 cubic feet of waste removed from the Tank Farms Accelerated $68M of Waste Feed Delivery Projects in support of early start up of the Waste Treatment Plant Completed Technology Development objectives Base Operation efficiencies and cost reductions realized 242-A Evaporator, 222-S Laboratory; and within Tanks Farms

Progress Groundwater remediation Progress made over past 20+ years has been Tri-Party team effort. Goal: Treat 3,200 gpm Additional treatment capacity (up to 6,000 gpm) 1989: TPA signed Stop liquid discharges 2009: Tri-Parties signed Gov. Gregoire s initiative to accelerate GW cleanup to offset other delays 1994: Regulators, stakeholders, and tribal nations develop a sitewide strategy Period of stagnancy due to focus on Columbia River corridor soil cleanup Acceleration of ongoing system 2009-11: Stimulus funding 2012-15: Stop chromium and strontium from entering the Columbia River 2024: Complete all river corridor GW remediation 2015: Full-scale implementation

Status Hanford tank waste Retrieving and treating this waste is Hanford s greatest challenge. Volume and Curies 177 tanks 28 double shell and 149 single shell (~67 leaked) 53 million gallons of mixed high-level waste Approximately 195 million curies 190,000 tons of chemicals hazardous waste 8 of 149 single-shell tanks retrieved West Valley 1% Managed as mixed high-level waste, regulated under Dangerous Waste/RCRA Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) under construction 0.5 million gal. Hanford 59% 53 million gal. Idaho 3% 3 million gal. Savannah River 37% 34 million gal.

USDOE 2012 & 2013 Budget Proposed Budgets Office of River Protection (Tank Farms) Office of River Protection (WTP) Richland Office 2012 Appropriation $445 Million $ 740Million $1,022 Million Hanford DOE Requested 2013 (compliant) House Proposed 2013 $ 519.1 Million $ 970 Million $ 1,429.5 Million $473 Million $ 690 Million $953.2 Million

Cleanup budget concerns Federal government s Continuing Resolution and lower FY2012 budget is affecting cleanup schedules Tri-Party Agencies agree to revise TPA to change eight deadlines, which delays some work in central Hanford, but still maintained major milestone final dates. Now considering additional delays Governor was informed November 21, 2011 that due to funding and technical concerns USDOE would likely not be able to meet Consent Decree milestones established in October 2010 for the Waste Treatment Plant for technical and budget reasons First Lifecycle Scope, Schedule & Cost report released in August finds it will take another $115 billion to finish Hanford cleanup through 2090

Delays to the Waste Treatment Plant Completion and Startup USDOE indicates with the expected appropriations they can t maintain the schedule. Optimal funding of $840M in 2012 increasing to $960M in 2014 maintains the CD schedule. Well known technical issues need to be resolved for completion; State believes these can be resolved or other options can be used to allow the project to continue. Proposal would slow down or stop construction on the pretreatment facility which would in turn delay startup up from 2 to 5 years

State Budget and Ecology s Work on Hanford Two primary sources of USDOE funding for our work: Mixed Waste Fees pay for our Hazardous Waste Act work overseeing mixed radioactive and chemical contamination Federal Grant pays for soils, groundwater and building demolition oversight work. These and other fee-supported funds cover ~99% of Hanford oversight Only state funds used for Hanford oversight are State Toxic s Account funding used for litigation Yucca Mountain High Level Waste Disposal and Natural Resources Damage Assessment.

Questions?