Derbyshire Constabulary GUIDANCE ON POLICE STAFF JOB EVALUATION USING HR PROGRESS POLICY REFERENCE 08/218 This guidance is suitable for Public Disclosure Owner of Doc: Head of Department, Human Resources Date Approved: March 2008 Review Date: July 2018 1
INDEX Heading Page No 1. Guidance Identification Page... 3 2. Legislative Compliance... 4 3. Part One: General Operating Issues... 4 4. Part Two: Detailed Analysis and Appeals Procedure... 5 5. Changes Identified by Management... 5 6. Procedure for Individual Claim... 6 7. Procedure when a Post Becomes Vacant... 6 8. Procedure for Evaluation of a New Post... 7 9. Appeals Procedure... 7 10. Part Four: Protection Issues... 8 2
1. Guidance Identification Page Guidance title: Guidance on Police Staff Job Evaluation Using HR Progress Registry Reference number: 08/218 Guidance implementation date: March 2008 Guidance review date: July 2018 Department / Division responsible: Guidance owner: Human Resources Head of Department Last reviewed by: Gemma Johnson Date last reviewed: July 2017 Impacts on other policies / guidance / documents (list): None Disclosable under FOI Act: YES Guidance to be published on Intranet YES Guidance to be published on Force Website YES 3
2. Legislative Compliance This document has been drafted to comply with the principles of the Human Rights Act. Proportionality has been identified as the key to Human Rights compliance, this means striking a fair balance between the rights of the individual and those of the rest of the community. There must be a reasonable relationship between the aim to be achieved and the means used. Equality and Diversity issues have also been considered to ensure compliance with the Equality Act 2010 and meet our legal obligation in relation to the equality duty. In addition, Data Protection, Freedom of Information and Health and Safety Issues have been considered. Adherence to this policy or procedure will therefore ensure compliance with all relevant legislation and internal policies. It is important that high quality customer service is provided as part of the Job Evaluation HR Progress Procedure and the standards specified in the Customer Service Policy apply throughout this document. 3. Part One: General Operating Issues 1. With effect from the agreed implementation date, HR Progress shall be used to determine the appropriate grading for all police staff posts. 2. The grading of each post shall be subject to analysis whenever any of the following circumstances arise: - (a) Organisational reviews which result in changes to the role undertaken by police staff. (b) Review of role instigated by management due to significant changes that have occurred. (c) Individual claim due to significant changes in the role. (d) A post becomes vacant. (e) A new post is created. 3. Any re-evaluation of a post may result in a change in grade that could go up or down. Any changes in grade will be backdated to the date the changes became substantive (subject to agreed protection arrangements). 4. Any reference to protection arrangements throughout the documentation will be to negotiated and agreed force protection arrangements in relation to the Job Evaluation process. 5. Jobholders who are UNISON members have the right to UNISON representation at all stages of the Job Evaluation process. 6. Following all evaluation and appeals procedures, all relevant documentation will be retained on file in the HR Department for a minimum of two years. 7. The Job Holder Questionnaire can be found under Force Forms Form 155. 4
4. Part Two: Detailed Analysis and Appeals Procedures Organisational Review a) Whenever an organisational review takes place, a revised job holder questionnaire. (Form 155) for each post is drawn up and agreed with jobholder(s) as appropriate. This MUST then be submitted to the HR Department for analysis and grading to be undertaken BEFORE the review is implemented. Where posts evolve or change significantly following an organisational review, the posts, on request will be reviewed on the first anniversary of the relevant implementation date. The review will be undertaken by the jobholder, line manager and appointed job analyst. b) The Jobholder, Line Manager or Head of Department/Divisional Commander as appropriate should complete the Jobholder Questionnaire (Form 155). Where the post is occupied, the completed questionnaire must be agreed between the Jobholder and the Line Manager and signed off by the Head of Department before the evaluation can proceed. c) Within 20 working days of receipt, the Job Analyst interviews the person who completed the questionnaire. d) Job evaluated by HR Progress. e) Within 15 working days of the interview, the Job Analyst or HR Department will communicate results in writing to the Head of Department/Divisional Commander and Jobholder. f) Role profile is finalised by Line Manager and a representative from HR. 5. Changes Identified by Management Whenever a Manager considers that, over a period of time, significant changes have occurred in the roles undertaken by Police Staff the following procedure must be followed. a) Job Holder Questionnaire completed by Jobholder if in post or the Line Manager or Head of Department/Divisional Commander if the post is vacant. b) Within 20 working days of receipt of completed questionnaire, Job Analyst interviews jobholder. c) Job evaluated by HR Progress. d) Within 15 days of interview, results communicated in writing to the Head of Department/Divisional Commander, the HR department and Jobholder. e) ICF Role Profile is finalised by Line Manager and HR. f) Jobholder has right of appeal under the appeals procedure. 5
6. Procedure for Individual Claim If a jobholder or group of jobholders working to a common Role Profile believe that significant changes have occurred in the role which may affect the grading of their post(s) they may submit an individual claim. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) A claim may be made on the grounds that there are substantial changes from the data collected at the last job evaluation and the role now performed. The Jobholder(s) must complete Form 151 and agree this with the Line Manager. The Head of Department/Divisional Commander or their nominated representative must agree that the terms of the claim are compatible with the Divisional/Departmental requirements and objectives. Once confirmed, the claim will be allocated to an analyst. If not confirmed, the claim will be referred back to the claimant(s) with advice to discuss with the management team. Within 15 working days of receipt of the completed questionnaire a Job Analyst will interview the claimant. Job evaluated by HR Progress. Within 15 working days of the interview, the results will be communicated in writing to claimant(s) and/or their representatives. If necessary, the ICF Role Profile relating to the post is revised by the line manager in conjunction with the HR department and issued to the job holder(s). The Jobholder(s) has the right of appeal. 7. Procedure when a Post Becomes Vacant (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) When a manager is aware of an impending vacancy the post MUST be reviewed as soon as possible to prevent any delay in the recruitment process. If substantial changes are identified a Job Holder questionnaire should be completed by the Line Manager/Head of Department/Divisional Commander. Within 20 working days of receipt of the completed questionnaire a Job Analyst will interview the Line Manager. Job evaluated by HR Progress. Within 15 working days of the interview the results will be communicated in writing to the Head of Department/Divisional Commander and HR. If an appointment is made prior to the completion of the Job Evaluation process, the advertisement and any subsequent letters of appointment, must specify that the grade is under review. 6
8. Procedure for Evaluation of a New Post Whenever a new post is created, the Job Holder Questionnaire MUST be submitted to HR for analysis and grading prior to advertising. New posts may be reviewed on the first anniversary of the jobholder s date of commencement of the post. The jobholder and line manager should instigate this if significant changes to the role have occurred. (a) (b) (c) (d) Questionnaire completed by individual developing the new post and agreed it with senior management. Within 20 working days, job analyst interviews appropriate individual with knowledge of job requirements. Post evaluated by HR Progress. Within 15 working days of the interview, results communicated in writing to the Line Manager, HR and Head of Department/Divisional Commander. 9. Appeals Procedure (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) The Jobholder(s) and/or their representatives should make appeals in writing to the HR Department within 20 working days of the evaluation results being notified to them. Any appeals received after this time scale will be considered in exceptional circumstances only. Receipt of the appeal will be acknowledged within 15 working days. A second analyst will be appointed to review the data from the original evaluation with the original Job Analyst and jobholder and/or Jobholders Line Manager as appropriate. Each relevant factor is addressed. Within 28 working days of receipt of appeal, a meeting will be held between the Jobholder(s) and/or their representative and the nominated analyst. Validity of the data is checked and the Analyst will agree with the Jobholder whether any amendments to the original data are necessary. Any amendments to the original data are made and the reason for each amendment recorded. After the amendments have been made the job is evaluated by HR Progress. Within 15 working days of the meeting, the results are communicated in writing to the Jobholder(s) and/or their representative, the Line Manager, HR and the Job Analyst. If the claim is successful, the date of implementation will be either the date of the original claim, implementation date of review or the commencement of employment, as appropriate. 7
10. Part Four: Protection Issues Where a re-evaluation of a post leads to a decrease in the grade, the negotiated and agreed Force Protection under the Reorganisation, Redeployment and Redundancy Policy will apply. 8