Low-risk Substances. Dr. Bernd Brielbeck Senior Manager Regulatory Affairs Agrochemicals and Biopesticides SCC Scientific Consulting Company, Germany

Similar documents
PP 1/296 (1) Principles of efficacy evaluation for low-risk plant protection products

The future of microbial products and regulatory issues

Benefits of good regulation for plant biologicals

10041/16 ADD 1 GSC/lt 1 DG B 2B

Introduction of Biopesticide and Biofertilizer Regulations in APO Countries

Principles of efficacy evaluation for microbial plant protection products

Plant Biostimulants: Emerging European legislative Scenario

The new Biocides Regulation proposal and the key issues for pest control in Europe. Dr Andy Adams Bayer ES, Lyon Chairman, Cefic EBPF

REGISTRATION REPORT Part A Risk Management. Product code: Product name(s): ACTIOL. Southern Zone Zonal Rapporteur Member State: France

IBMA WHITE PAPER NEW EU REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR BIOPROTECTION AGENTS. IBMA Vision on how to improve regulation in the European Union

Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)

Efficacy for lowrisk. industry view, Efficacy workshop, Ede April David Cary, Executive Director of IBMA

FINAVESTAN EMA. Page 1 of 15. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

Efficacy requirements for the

EU Legal framework for Pesticides and Residues

Glyphosate in the EU

Biostimulants, Beneficial Substances & Plant Regulators: An EPA Perspective

Guidance on requirements for efficacy data for zonal evaluation of a plant protection product in the Northern Zone

OPEN QUESTIONS in the new system (1107/2009 EC)

The keystones of the proposed approach, presented in section 4 of that document, were the followings:

The most important items in the new EU pesticide Regulation

Importance of minor uses for the chemical industry and initiatives

Implementing Regulation 1107/2009 Stage of Progress An Industry Perspective CEUREG Forum, Brno, 7 October 2010

June, 2011 Guidance on requirements for efficacy data for zonal evaluation of a plant protection product in the Northern Zone

An overview of Niche Uses of Highly Specific Biocontrol Products: How to bring solutions to farmers. David Cary Executive Director IBMA

Workshop Assessment of Persistent, Bioaccumulative and Toxic (PBT) substances in different EU legislations

Biopesticides in the U.S. Risk Assessment/Risk Management Regulatory Processes & Emerging Technologies

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH AND CONSUMERS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

DISCOVER OUR SEGMENT AGROCHEMICALS & BIORATIONALS

Import tolerances in the European Union Can Import Tolerances be set for active substances impacted by the EU hazard-based criteria?

AT Experiences with the Zonal Evaluation Process (2)

Implementation of Regulation 1107/2009, current issues and future challenges

Comparative assessment

PAN Europe s briefing on:

Association of American Pesticide Control Officials Alexandria, VA, 9 March 2016 Biostimulants & Biopesticides

Proposal for a revised Fertilising Products Regulation. An update on the proposed Biostimulants Regulatory process in Europe

Biological products: their significance in IPM strategies and risk management. Wilma Mac Pherson Minor crop workshop 11 April 2018

Regulation on pesticide statistics. Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development

"PESTCIDE REGISTRATION SYSTEM IN POLAND - PROBLEMS EXPECTED IN THE LIGHT OF NEW EU REGULATION"

Questions and answers on the pesticides strategy

Sustainable plant protection. Dutch sustainable initiative and activities

Workshop Efficacy Requirements and Evaluation of Plant Protection Products based on Low-Risk Active Substances, Ede (NL), /07

Lorraine P. Berk et t. IPM Spec ialist Universit y of Verm ont

Framework Directive on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides

CHA 1526 Page 1 of 18. REGISTRATION REPORT Part A. Risk Management

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Safety of the food chain Chemicals, contaminants, pesticides

Technical Guidance Paper drr - Part B Section 7 - Efficacy. Versie 1. (2015)

Iain Weatherston Ph.D. Senior Managing Consultant Technology Sciences Group Inc. Washington, D.C.

DRAFT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

Gábor Tőkés Food Chain Safety Office Directorate for Plant Protection, Soil Conservation and Agri-Environment

FSC STANDARD. Indicators and thresholds for the identification of highly hazardous pesticides (HHP) Forest Stewardship Council FSC-STD V1-0 EN

New Regulation on Fertilising Products

Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development

Current activities of the European Commission in the area of pesticide residues

Introduction to GHS. The Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals. Cecilia Westöö April 2014 Bangkok

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 March /09 ADD 1 REV 1. Interinstitutional File: 2008/0002 (COD) DENLEG 51 CODEC 893

County Council of Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Ordinance No. O

Ordinance on the Placing on the Market and Handling of Biocidal Products

Guidance on the application of mutual recognition in Norway

The Danish Green Growth Action Plan initiative for authorisation of more alternative plant protection products. Henrik F.

DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD

Polgar ACRO Registration of Pesticides in Russia and Ukraine: Applicants feedback

Annual Biocontrol Industry Meeting. Lucerne, Switserland. Jeroen Meeussen 22 October 2007

Biopesticides: the way ahead. Wyn Grant & David Chandler University of Warwick

Review of the List of restricted substances under RoHS II

IFOAM EU position paper on the Commission proposal for a new fertiliser regulation. January 2017

Impact of organic legislation on the biocontrol business in the EU

Pesticides in USAID Projects: Environmental Requirements and Considerations. [February -2017]

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2017/2284(INI)

EPPO Workshop on Comparative Assessment in the framework of substitution Brussels, /07

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

DRAFT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION

Biopesticides in the United States

Council conclusions on the EU action plan for the circular economy

EN United in diversity EN A8-0270/373. Amendment. Pascal Durand on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Update from the Commission: latest developments in the biocides field

Registration of Pesticides in Ukraine: Procedure and Requirements. Tatsiana Palchekh

EN 1 EN 1. INTRODUCTION

Management of MRL applications submitted for active substances under Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and

Agricultural Biologicals today and tomorrow: potential and regulations. Pete Marshall, Monsanto Canada CSTA AGM, July, 2015

EUROPEAN COMMISSION SUMMARY REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON PLANTS, ANIMALS, FOOD AND FEED HELD IN BRUSSELS ON 22 JUNE 2016

value chain of a product

AmCham EU s position on the proposed Directive on lightweight plastic carrier bags

OECD, EU, US, CANADIAN, JAPANESE AND AUSTRALIAN NUMBERING SYSTEMS FOR DATA AND INFORMATION ON PHEROMONE AND OTHER SEMIOCHEMICAL FORMULATED PRODUCTS

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT AND SUBSTITUTION OF PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS IN SPAIN

CAP. 346 [Rev. 2012] Pest Control Products

Towards a non-toxic circular economy

A Global CRO STRONGER TOGETHER

(Acts whose publication is obligatory) DIRECTIVE 98/8/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL. of 16 February 1998

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

BIOPROTECTION GLOBAL

SVHC Authorisation and Restrictions

The Village of New Paltz Board of Trustees. Healthy Turf and Landscape Policy

ECPA Technical Guidance Paper No: 2012/1

252 nd American Chemical Society National Meeting and Exposition

IPM Plan for Campus Landscape

HARMONISING ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENTS OF PESTICIDES

Environmental Risk Assessment

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT AT YOUR FACILITY:

Transcription:

Low-risk Substances Dr. Bernd Brielbeck Senior Manager Regulatory Affairs Agrochemicals and Biopesticides SCC Scientific Consulting Company, Germany October 2017

Overview Regulatory and political framework Handling of low risk substance legislation and guidance Experience and way ahead Another issue 2

Regulatory and political framework REGULATION 1107/2009 of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of Plant Protection Products on the market REGULATION 1185/2009 of 25 November 2009 concerning statistics on pesticides DIRECTIVE 2009/128/EC of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides DIRECTIVE 2009/127/EC of 21 October 2009 amending Directive 2006/42/EC with regard to machinery for pesticide application COM(2012) 79 final on the European Innovation Partnership 'Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability COM(2012) 60 final Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Directorate E Biotechnologies, Agriculture, Food, Unit E.1 Horizontal aspects: Innovating for Sustainable Growth - A Bioeconomy for Europe of 13 February 2012 REGULATION 1305/2013 of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) REGULATION 1306/2013 of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy REGULATION 1307/2013 of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy REGULATION 1291/2013 of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Agriculture and Rural Development, Study - Precision Agriculture: an opportunity for EU farmers - potential support with the CAP 2014-2020 of June 2014. REGULATION 233/2014 of 11 March 2014 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation for the period 2014-2020 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on technological solutions for sustainable agriculture in the EU (2015/2225(INI)) European Parliament resolution of 15 February 2017 on Low-risk Pesticides of biological origin (2016/2903(RSP)) 3

Regulatory and political framework (cont.) REGULATION 1107/2009 of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of Plant Protection Products on the market 4

Regulatory and political framework (cont.) REGULATION 1291/2013 of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) 5

Regulatory and political framework (cont.) Motion for a European Parliament resolution on technological solutions for sustainable agriculture in the EU (2015/2225(INI)) European Parliament resolution of 15 February 2017 on Low-risk Pesticides of biological origin (2016/2903(RSP)) 6

Regulatory and political framework (cont.) Motion for a European Parliament resolution on technological solutions for sustainable agriculture in the EU (2015/2225(INI)) + European Parliament resolution of 15 February 2017 on Low-risk Pesticides of biological origin (2016/2903(RSP)) Clear criteria for defining Low-risk Active Substances for the development and use of Low-risk Pesticides Non-chemical alternatives to Plant Protection Products such as biological controls, should be given provisional approval for use and priority for evaluation Faster approvals process would increase the availability of Low-risk Plant Protection Products on the market and reduce the risk of resistance to Active Substances and the effects on non-target species linked to commonly used Plant Protection Products Invite the Member States to include the use of Low-risk Pesticides of biological origin in their national action plans on the protection of the environment and of human health 7

Regulatory and political framework (cont.) EU Regulation 1107/2009: This Regulation shall apply to substances, including micro-organisms having general or specific action against harmful organisms or on plants, parts of plants or plant products, referred to as active substances Microbials Semiochemicals /pheromones OECD Macrobials/ Invertebrates (nationally) Plant extracts/ botanicals FAO Plant- Incorporated- Protectants Biochemicals Plant strengtheners (nationally) Upcoming new EU fertiliser regulation Biostimulants No legal definition of Biopesticide in the EU. To account for a character of an active substance different risk categories are used regardless of type or origin of the Active Substance or its chemical or microbial origin Basic Substance Low-risk Substance Any other Active Substance 8

Regulatory and political framework (cont.) Basic Substance Article 23(2) Including foodstuff Approved Not Approved 15 5 Risk profile Low-risk Substance * 10 0 Reduced risk Active Substance renewal only Conventional Active Substance 395 808 Candidate for substitution Active Substance 73 5 Cut-off Active Substance 0 * 38 substances AIR 4 renewal programme (05/2017) Group 2 - presumably Low-risk Substances 493 818 Pending 28 Not a PPP 20 High risk profile 9

Handling of Low-risk Legislation and Guidance SANTE-2016-10616 rev 7 of May 2017 Group 1 substances with expiry date before 30 April 2019 51 substances, 32 applications for renewal submitted, 25 substances are presumed to be Low-risk Group 2 Low-risk Substances 38 substances, all substances are presumed to be low-risk substances; all substances will be postponed with one year Group 3 substances that may fail to satisfy approval criteria 13 substances. For all substances there is indication that they may fail to satisfy the criteria listed in points 3.6.2 to 3.6.5 and point 3.7 of Annex II to Regulation 1107/2009 Group 4 substances with current expiry dates between 31/07/2019 and 31/12/2021 112 substances. Current expiry dates will be postponed with either 2 or 3 years 10

Handling of Low-risk Legislation and Guidance (cont.) SANTE/11953/2015 - rev. 3.1 of 6 November 2015: Low-risk Substances are in many cases botanical Active Substances, Semiochemicals, Micro-organisms or Minerals. However, neither must the scope of Low-risk Active Substances be limited to this non-exhaustive list of substance groups, nor can all substances belonging to these groups be considered as Low-risk Substances without further assessment SANCO/11188/2013 - rev. 2 of 14 September 2015: Guidance document on criteria for the inclusion of Active Substances into Annex IV of Regulation 396/2005 11

Handling of Low-risk Legislation and Guidance (cont.) EPPO PP 1/296: Principles of efficacy evaluation for Low-risk Plant Protection Products Voting September 2017 Publication scheduled for October 2017 Acceptability of non-gep trials if scientifically sound and in line with other applicable EPPO Standards Data to demonstrate that product can give a benefit to the user Reduction of number of direct efficacy trials, phytotoxicity trials, etc. if applicable Possibilities for extrapolation from field trials on crops or pests other than those for which registration is proposed Use of EPPO extrapolation tables for minor uses also to be applied for major uses Scientific approach and justifications e.g. use of MoA to extrapolate between different crops and pests, Comparability of target biology Use of worst case circumstances regarding product performance to extrapolate to less critical circumstances Comparability of target biology, growth habit and structure of crop, etc. 12

Handling of Low-risk Legislation and Guidance (cont.) Regulation 1107/2009, Annex II REGULATION 2017/1432 of 7 August 2017 A.s. other than microorganism shall not be considered as Low-risk Explosive Explosive Carcinogenic Carcinogenic category 1A, 1B or 2 Mutagenic Mutagenic category 1A, 1B or 2 Toxic to reproduction Toxic to reproduction category 1A, 1B or 2 Sensitizing chemicals Skin sensitizer category 1 NEW: Respiratory sensitizer category 1 Very toxic or toxic Acute toxicity category 1, 2 or 3 Specific Target Organ Toxicant category 1 or 2 Endocrine disruptor Neurotoxic Immunotoxic Priority substance New categories of toxicity: Skin corrosive category 1A, 1B or 1C Serious damage to eyes category 1 NEW: Toxic to aquatic life of acute and chronic category 1 Endocrine disruptor Neurotoxic Immunotoxic Identified as priority substance under Directive 2000/60/EC Persistence > 60 days and bio-concentration > 100 13

Handling of Low-risk Legislation and Guidance (cont.) REGULATION 2017/1432 of 7 August 2017 Naturally occurring Active Substance Other than micro-organism and does not correspond to any of the categories above, may be considered as being low-risk, even if it is persistent: Half-life > 60 days Bio-concentration > 100 Active substance for communication Other than micro-organism, and does not correspond to any of the categories above, Shall be considered as being low-risk, when Emitted and used by plants, animals and other organisms for communication Baculoviruses shall be considered as being of low-risk Unless at strain level they have demonstrated adverse effects on non-target insects 14

Handling of Low-risk Legislation and Guidance (cont.) REGULATION 2017/1432 of 7 August 2017 Micro-organisms An Active Substance which is a micro-organism may be considered as being of Lowrisk Unless at strain level it has demonstrated multiple resistance to anti-microbials used in human or veterinary medicine BUT e.g. CTGB: In general all micro-organisms which fit the approval criteria and do not show multiple resistance to anti-microbials used in human or veterinary medicine will be considered as Low-risk substances. Some exceptions however are made. For example, the recently approved Beauveria bassiana 147 was not granted low-risk status due to a relevant metabolite COM: we are still working on a focused technical document with respect to implementation of Low-risk criteria Will the exception to the rule become the rule? 15

Handling of Low-risk Legislation and Guidance (cont.) REGULATION 1107/2009 Article 47 - Placing on the market of Low-risk Plant Protection Products 3. The Member State shall decide within 120 days whether to approve an application for authorisation of a low-risk plant protection product Does not apply to: Article 43 - Renewal of authorisation 5. Member States shall decide on the renewal of the authorisation of a plant protection product at the latest 12 months after the renewal of the approval of the Active Substance, safener or synergist contained therein 16

Experience and way ahead Scientific approach often not sufficient regulatory execution of data requirements requested Actual handling of Low-risk Substances often contrary to intentions as stated e.g. in Parliament motion 2015/2225(INI) A.s. batch analysis: Peak clarification < 0.1% to additionally prove Low-risk status Additional toxicity testing to prove Low-risk status (incl. vertebrate testing) FOCUS calculations for micro-organisms Availability GLP labs for micro-organism characterization Copyright issues for publications to be cited in dossiers Lack of transfer of knowledge to farmers use, relevance and incorporation in IPM unclear Market acceptance for Low-risk a.s. and products impaired Existing/upcoming Guidance e.g. endocrine (loss of nat. substances such as Vitamin D3, caffeine, Genistein ) 17

Experience and way ahead (cont.) Besides development of new Legislation and the Guidance there are several positive new developments regarding Low-risk, also at MS level, e.g. DGAL/SDQPV/2016-279 du 01/04/2016: Liste des produits de biocontrôle mentionnée à l article 1er de l arrêté du 9 mars 2016 fixant le taux de la taxe sur la vente de produits phytopharmaceutiques CTGB (2017): Evaluation Manual for the Authorisation of Biopesticides according to Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 - Microorganisms, Botanicals, Semiochemicals version 1.0; July 2017 Maintain risk assessment at a high level (2016/2903(RSP)) Keep snake oil products out of the market Verify reliability of Low-risk Products (and Biopesticides) to foster IPM and Precision Farming Systems and safeguard EUs future agricultural needs 18

Another issue Revision of Regulation 1107/2009 and Definition Current Art. 2 of Reg. 1107/2009 Upcoming Art. 2 of Reg. 1107/2009 (b) influencing the life processes of plants, such as substances influencing their growth, other than as a nutrient (b) influencing the life processes of plants, such as substances influencing their growth, other than as nutrients or other than as plant biostimulants Upcoming Addition to Art. 3 of Reg. 1107/2009 34. "plant biostimulant" means a product stimulating plant nutrition processes independently of the product's nutrient content with the sole aim of improving one or more of the following characteristics of the plant: (a) Nutrient use efficiency (b) Tolerance to abiotic stress (c) Crop quality traits 19

Another issue Existing categories and approvals Regulation 1107/2009 Pesticide Categories Acaricide (AC) Algicide (AL) Attractant (AT) Bactericide (BA) Desiccant (DE) Elicitor( EL) Fungicide (FU) Herbicide (HB) Insecticide (IN) Molloscicide (MO) Nematicide (NE) Other Treatment (OT Plant Activator (PA) Plant Growth Regulator (PG) Pruning Repellant (RE) Rodenticide (RO) Safener Soil Treatment (ST) Synergist Virus Inoculation (VI) Sea-algae extract (formerly sea-algae extract and seaweeds) Acts as a growth regulator in many horticultural crops. In particular it: - Promotes root development increasing plant s ability to take up nutrients - Promotes growth of young tissues - Improves crop yields through improved blooming and fruit set - Improves quality of fruits - Improves plant resistance to stress, frost, adverse weather conditions, pests and diseases (DAR) No application for renewal of the a.s. submitted 20

Another issue Existing categories and approvals Regulation 1107/2009 (cont.) Pesticide Categories Acaricide (AC) Algicide (AL) Attractant (AT) Bactericide (BA) Desiccant (DE) Elicitor( EL) Fungicide (FU) Herbicide (HB) Insecticide (IN) Molloscicide (MO) Nematicide (NE) Other Treatment (OT Plant Activator (PA) Plant Growth Regulator (PG) Pruning Repellant (RE) Rodenticide (RO) Safener Soil Treatment (ST) Synergist Virus Inoculation (VI) Prospects of regulatory differentiation of abiotic and biotic stresses: - Loss of useful Substances/Products required in plant protection especially regarding IPM and resistance management - (Illegal) use of PPP uses (biotic stress) under fertiliser regulation? Alternative - Registration of biostimulants under PPP legislation with strongly reduced data requirements 21