WATER AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS FOR THE CAPITAN TRADING POST SUBDIVISION CAPITAN, NM

Similar documents
INTRODUCTION DATA COLLECTED WATER BILLING AND PRODUCTION DATA

Contents 8/31/2017 DRAFT REGIONAL IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN & ANALYSIS

FEE SCHEDULE 7 Water Development and Connection Fees Aurora Water (Platted Before January 1, 2017)

City of Fredericksburg Water Conservation

Headwaters Underground Water Conservation. District Hill Country Priority Groundwater Management Area

Draft Population and Water Demand Projections for Municipal Water User Groups

Analysis of Potential Water Savings from Residential and Irrigation Accounts in the South Platte Basin Through 2050

Analysis of City of Davis 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Jessica Collado, Junyan Li, Vicki Lin

A P P E N D I X E D E M A N D & P A S S I V E S A V I N G S M E T H O D O L O G Y

Santa Fe County Sustainable Land Development Code ORDINANCE NO , December 8, 2015

3. Water Conservation Program

Water Use & Demand Management

Water Use & Demand Management. Arizona Water Issues 2012 The University of Arizona HWR203

Northeast Wyoming River Basins Plan Domestic Water Use Task 2B. Date: February 2002 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 4 SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA

WATER MANAGEMENT AND CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE BEAVER DAM VILLAGE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT FINAL. September 14, 2004 Job Number:

GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF CAPACITY ANALYSIS REPORTS

WATER END-USE AND EFFICIENCY PROJECT (WEEP) A CASE STUDY

Drought Response and Drought Rates. October 23, 2014

Marin Municipal Water District 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Water Demand Analysis and Water Conservation Measures Update FINAL

Drought Response and Drought Rates. Castro Valley, CA November 19, 2014

Tampa Bay Water Water Demand Management Plan Final Report

ORDINANCE NO. 58 ESTABLISHING INDOOR WATER CONSERVATION REGULATIONS WESTBOROUGH WATER DISTRICT

10497 Town and Country Way, Suite 600 Houston, Texas fax

Potential. Capital Cost

Analysis of Five Years of Municipal Water Use Data To Estimate Commercial and Institutional Per Capita Use

4.2 Step 2 Profile of Water Demands and Historical Demand Management

Water Hungry: A Water Conservation Study at Hennepin County Medical Center. Rachel Kosse

2010 California Green Building Standards Code: Nation s First Mandatory Statewide Standards Code to Green Construction and Fight Climate Change

SKAGIT WATERSHED RULE & EXEMPT WELLS CASE STUDY May 2008

2012 Water Management Plan

Exhibit 1 City of Lake Oswego WMCP Progress Report Progress Report for Benchmarks Listed in the 2007 WMCP (Appendix E: Matrix 1 and 2)

Water & Energy Conservation. Topics Covered

NFRWSP: Conservation/Irrigation Efficiency Methods Briefing. Jennifer Gihring SJRWMD February 17, 2015

Municipal and Industrial Water and Wastewater Demand Forecasting Methodology.

SPECIAL PUBLICATION SJ2006-SP13 POTENTIAL WATER SAVINGS OF CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES

APPENDIX K. Water Shortage Contingency. City of Modesto Drought Contingency Plan City of Modesto Resolution No Draft MID Resolution

WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS EAST SIDE WATER TREATMENT SUPPLY PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

WaterSense: Every Drop Counts

Water Supply Planning for the Morongo Basin Area

Update on Conservation and Executive Order B Erik Ekdahl Director Office of Research, Planning, and Performance

ENERGY EFFICIENCY GUIDEBOOK FOR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

KENT COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY

1006 UTILITIES, STREET LIGHTS, WATER SUPPLY, SEWAGE DISPOSAL, SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT, AND EROSION CONTROL

WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS EAST SIDE WATER TREATMENT SUPPLY PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER 4 Water Demand

GRAYWATER USE IN NEW MEXICO

Water Auditing 101. William D. Chvala, Jr., CEM. Greg Sullivan, PE, CEM. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

California Drought Discussion Water Conservation Action

MWRD Infiltration and Inflow Control Program Compliance Update. Committee of the Whole Meeting April 3, 2018

THE FINANCIAL BENEFITS OF WATER CONSERVATION: THE TUCSON STORY

Activity Water is Life

Section 3 - Land Use, Population, and Water Demands. Section 3

Lower Rio Grande Water Users Organization Water Symposium June, 2007 Jorge A. Garcia, Ph.D., P.E. Utilities Director

17. WATER SUPPLY. TABLE 17.1 Average Daily Potable Water Demand

Developer s Packet. Water Construction

4. Which of these use process water? [Choose three] A. Toilets B. Urinals C. Cooling tower D. Washing machine E. Dishwasher

YCWRS - Yakima County Water Resource System

PREPARING FOR AN UNCERTAIN WATER FUTURE: CONSERVATION, DEMAND

Utility Customer Profile Guide for Water Conservation Planning

Boise City Climate Protection Program Advisory Committee Recommendations August 2007

Analysis of implementation of water conservation strategies by regional water planning groups by Ken Kramer

North Florida Regional Water Supply Plan 2015: Demand Projection Methods / Results

Appendix 2: Water Demand Projections

Table 17.A1 and Table 17.A2 below show water demand and supply for the Project respectively. Table 17.A1 Potable and Non-Potable Water Demand [1]

Water Supply and Conservation

Evaluation of Water Use Reduction Achieved Through Residential Toilet Fixture Replacements

INDIAN WELLS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2010 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN MAY Prepared by

2015 Water Resources Status Report

UNIFORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR EXTENDING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SECTION 2 DESIGN STANDARDS

PCCD Groundwater Rules Overview

WaterSense The Next Decade

W A T E R C O N S E R V A T I O N P L A N

WRIA 59 Water Bank Feasibility Study

Individual Water Reduction in Accordance with California State Water Mandate. Becker, Jake Karabinos, Brian Smith, Kyle

GUIDANCE DOCUMENT WATER SUPPLY CAPACITY MANAGEMENT PLANS MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Livingston County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division. Hydrogeologic Investigation Requirements for Land Division Developments

DALLAS COUNTY PARK CITIES MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN ADOPTED: APRIL 9, 2019 PREPARED BY:

Investing In Water: Business Opportunities in Water Efficiency. Rob Zimmerman, LEED-AP Sr. Channel Manager Sustainability Kohler Co.

Water Conservation Partnering to Save Water Essex County Environmental Commission Verona, NJ. April 4, 2016

Energy Efficiency & Sustainable Construction Act of 2008, EESCA

Address: South Elgin, IL Phone: ( ) - Fax: ( ) - Cell: ( ) - Phone: ( ) - Fax: ( ) - Cell: ( ) - Contact Person:

DROUGHT MANAGEMENT AND WATER CONSERVATION IN CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE COUNTY

Revising Water and Wastewater Impact Fees in a Time of Rapid Change in the West

APPENDIX K ESTIMATION OF SAVINGS AND COSTS FOR WATER CONSERVATION STRATEGIES

Utility Service Application

Water Conservation Plan

Green River Basin Plan Executive Summary

ANALYSIS OF WATER DEMAND AND CONSUMPTION BY SECTOR

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

HYDROLOGIC DETERMINATION Water Availability from Navajo Reservoir and the Upper Colorado River Basin for Use in New Mexico.

Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority Water Demand Analysis

AUGUST 30, 2016 DRAFT WATER SYSTEM PLAN TEXT AND TABLES BYWATER BAY WATER SYSTEM WITH SHINE PLAT

Water Meter Monitoring

Technical and Physical Feasibility Fact Sheet Alternative 28: Infill/Density

Technical Memorandum. Prepared for: Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission Project Title: Sustaining Scioto Project No.:

Montara Water and Sanitary District 2011 New Customer CIP and Water Capacity Charge. Presentation to Board April 21, 2011

Developer s Packet. For Developments Requiring Large Meters

Supporting Information for Rainwater Catchment Rebate:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW SENATE BILL 668

Transcription:

WATER AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS FOR THE CAPITAN TRADING POST SUBDIVISION CAPITAN, NM PREPARED BY BENCHMARK ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, INC OCTOBER 26, 2011

NOTICE This document is prepared for submittal with the Final Subdivision Plat. It is based on the data, findings, and recommendations contained in the duly adopted 40 Year Water Plan for the Village of Capitan and is not intended to supersede that document to any degree nor can it be construed to bind the Village in any way. Only new data of public record are introduced and the analysis of these data is intended to assist Village staff in deciding if there is sufficient water to serve the proposed subdivision.

BENCHM RK ENGINEERING SURVEYING PROJECT NO. 310305 Introduction WATER AVAILABILITY ANALYSIS FOR THE CAPITAN TRADING POST SUBDIVISION CAPITAN, NM This report is to provide supporting documentation for the requirement of the preliminary plat submittal that includes: A Water Supply Plan, certified by a registered professional engineer or professional hydro-geologist. Water must be sufficient in quantity to fulfill the maximum annual water requirements of the subdivision for indoor and outdoor use for a 70-year period, as certified by a letter from the Village Water Department or other water utility providing the water. This is a two-part requirement. The first is a water supply plan certified by an engineer or hydrogeologist, and the second is certification by the Village that there is sufficient water to supply the subdivision for a 70 year period. There is already the duly adopted 40-Year Water Plan 2000-2040 that was prepared for the Village of Capitan by Livingston Associates in 1998. In order to assist the water department which would have to certify that there is a sufficient quantity of water to supply the subdivision for a 70 year period, this report shall use the 40 Year Water Plan to help quantify the effects of the proposed new subdivision on Capitan s water supply. This will amount to applying the data contained in the Water Plan and extrapolating the identified trends to project the impact of the subdivision on Capitan s water supply. Even though it is now 2011, the 70-year period should be from 2000-2070. This is in order to make meaningful comparisons with the data and findings of the Water Plan and is no different than, say, calculating present, past, or future worth as needed when comparing financial projections. Following are my preliminary findings arranged by topic in the same order as presented in the 40 Year Water Plan. Existing Water Demands The Water Plan tabulates water use by class as of 1997, and water meter installations from 1994 through 1997. These are reproduced here for reference Benchmark Engineering & Surveying -1- PO Box 1281

Existing Water Use by Class (1997) Use Class Water Meter Installations 1994 to 1997 We don t know from the Water Plan alone how many of these meters are domestic, but it is safely conservative to include the high-use meters and divide the total water use by the total number of meters. Accordingly, the domestic use in 1997 should not be more than 207 gallons per meter per day. Assuming that patterns of use remain more or less constant over the years, this quantity should remain representative of household use for Capitan in future years. Existing Water Rights Gallons/ Year Gallons/ Month The total ground water rights available for diversion at the time of the Water Plan are 264.5925 acre-feet/annum (AF/AN) and of this the consumptive use is 221.3535 AF/AN. There was an additional 22.5875 AF/AN increase identified if waste water return flow credits are applied for and approved, and it appears that this has since been done. Additional surface and groundwater rights are held in the interest of the Eagle Creek Water Association (ECWA), and these comprise 800 AF/AN surface water rights and 38.88 AF/AN groundwater rights. At the time of the Water Plan, a draft proposal was under consideration by the Office of the State Engineer (OSE) to transfer 500 AF/AN to Capitan s well field (OSE File H-685) and to lease the remaining 300 AF/AN to Ruidoso. Gallons/ Day Total AC FT % of Total Total 54,773,500 4,564,458 150,064 168 100% Domestic 49,798,185 4,149,849 136,433 153 91% School 1,328,364 110,697 3,639 4 2% Irrigation 1,877,578 156,465 5,144 6 3% Smokey Bear Restaurant 1,769,373 147,448 4,848 5 3% Year New Meters Installed Total No. of Meters Percentage Increase 1994 620 1995 25 645 4.0% 1996 30 675 4.7% 1997 49 724 7.3% Average 5.3% Since that time, the surface water rights were successfully transferred to Capitan s well field. An abstract of OSE File H-685 dated January 31, 2006 shows that Capitan is permitted a total diversion of 1018.914 AF/AN for consumptive use. This is subject however to a temporary Benchmark Engineering & Surveying -2- PO Box 1281

transfer of 599.92 acre-feet to Ruidoso that is in effect. This temporary transfer is itself subject to reversion by written request of Capitan. Population Projections Since the time of the Water Plan, the results of the 2000 Census and the 2010 Census are available. The historical populations of Capitan are shown to the right. During the period from 1970 to 2010 the population increased from 439 to 1489. Although the actual increases are not steady, the average yearly growth rate for this period is 3.1% calculated as follows: Census Population 1960 552 1970 439 1980 762 1990 840 2000 1443 2010 1489 / 1 0.031 This is consistent with the moderate growth rate scenario (3.0% annual growth) identified in the Water Plan and it is appropriate then to use this scenario for the purposes of projecting future water demands. A revised projection that starts with the actual 2000 population and assumes an annual growth rate of 3.1% is shown to the right. It overestimates the actual 2010 projection, but should be reasonably predictive of the growth over a 40 year period. Projected Year Population 2000 1489 2005 1735 2010 2021 2015 2354 2020 2742 2025 3194 2030 3721 2035 4335 2040 5049 Future Water Demands The water plan assumed that meter installations would continue at an annual rate of 5% until 2010 and then would continue following one of the low, moderate or high growth rates. Here we will assume installation continues only at the moderate growth rate after 2010. The Water Plan assumed that the water demands for the Smoky Bear Restaurant and school Year 2000 2005 MGY 75.10 90.37 AF/AN 230.56 277.43 irrigation will not change. Otherwise, it assumed that school, commercial and domestic water demands will all follow the domestic growth rate. 2010 108.61 333.45 2015 125.33 384.77 The Water Plan further assumes that the current demand is 135 2020 2025 144.71 167.18 444.27 513.24 GPCD and that this would be reduced after 2010 to 123 GPCD through conservation programs. 2030 193.23 593.21 2035 223.42 685.90 Accordingly, the future water demands from the Water Plan 2040 258.38 793.24 assuming moderate growth are as shown to the left. Benchmark Engineering & Surveying -3- PO Box 1281

Note that at 123 GPCD along with an assumption that domestic use is 90% of the total, 258.38 MGY translates to a population of 5230 persons. Available Lands for Growth According to the Water Plan, there are approximately 1,600 building sites within the municipal boundaries. In 1997 there were 724 meters so approximately 876 of these were not served as of 1997. The Water Plan assumes an average population of 3.2 persons per household so that at total build-out the population should be approximately 5120 persons. This is within 2% of the number of people that the water demand table equates to at the end of 2040. Therefore build-out can be reasonably expected to occur at about the end of the 40 year period. Capitan s total permitted diversion for consumptive use is 1018.914 AF/AN. This means that after serving all existing building sites, there are an excess of 225.674 AF/AN for new development. Water Conservation The Water Plan shows the historical consumption rate for Capitan is 208 gallons per household per day, which is 0.232 AF/AN. At 3.2 persons per household, this is 65 GPCD. Below is a table showing national averages based on increasing levels of conservation along with estimates prepared by Atkins and Associates for a comparable project in Lincoln County: Indoor Use (avg. day) AWWARF Vickers AWWA Atkins Conservation None None Some Max None Some Max Toilets 18.50 20.40 8.20 12.20 18.50 8.20 7.70 Showers 11.60 15.90 13.30 2.60 11.60 8.80 7.49 Baths 1.20 - - - 1.20 1.20 4.20 Faucets 10.90 12.00 6.00 6.00 10.90 10.80 10.50 Dishwasher 1.00 1.10 0.70 0.40 1.00 0.70 0.85 Washing Machine 15.00 18.90 10.00 8.90 15.00 10.00 3.90 Leakage 9.50 3.42 1.91 1.51 9.50 4.00 1.73 Other 1.50 - - - 1.60 1.60 - Sub Total (gpcd) 69.20 71.72 40.11 31.61 69.30 45.30 36.37 Per Lot (@3.2/lot) 221.44 229.50 128.35 101.15 221.76 144.96 116.38 Atkins Outdoor Use (avg. day) Per Lot 9.80 Total Indoor & Outdoor Per Lot 126.18 The current 65 GPCD is in line with national averages where there is no conservation and so the current 208 gallons per lot per day can be dramatically reduced. Benchmark Engineering & Surveying -4- PO Box 1281

For a new subdivision, with modern appliances and strict conservation measures in place, a reasonable expectation of water use is 127 gallons per household per day, which is 0.142 AF/AN per household. So, according to the Water Plan using the moderate growth scenario over a period of 70 years, it appears that Capitan has sufficient water rights to meet complete build-out of lands now within its municipal boundaries with 225.674 AF/AN remaining for new development. With achievable conservation measures applied to new development this remainder should accommodate 1590 new households. Benchmark Engineering and Surveying, Paul van Gulick, PE, PS, CFM NOTICE This document is prepared for submittal with the Final Subdivision Plat. It is based on the data, findings, and recommendations contained in the duly adopted 40 Year Water Plan for the Village of Capitan and is not intended to supersede that document to any degree nor can it be construed to bind the Village in any way. Only new data of public record are introduced and the analysis of these data is intended to assist Village staff in deciding if there is sufficient water to serve the proposed subdivision. Benchmark Engineering & Surveying -5- PO Box 1281