Project Findings: Appendix 2

Similar documents
Project Findings: Appendix 2

ENTRY FORM. DVASE 2017 Excellence in Structural Engineering Awards Program

UNIT-1 RETAINING WALLS

East Lyme Middle School EAST LYME MIDDLE SCHOOL

UNREINFORCED MASONRY STRUCTURES -PART I - DEFINITIONS AND PROBLEMS UNDER LATERAL LOADS

Lessons learned: 3.2.Stability concepts

Structural Engineering

COMPARISON OF MULTISTORY WALL RESULTS BETWEEN ADAPT-EDGE 1 AND ETABS 2 CONCRETE FRAME WITH SHEARWALLS

Restoration of vaults

Volume 1. HOW TO MAKE A DREAM HOUSE EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT Contents

City of Washburn Building Assessment

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON DAMAGES SUFFERED BY MASONRY BUILDINGS IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE L AQUILA EARTHQUAKE OF 6 th APRIL 2009

Effect of Infill as a Structural Component on the Column Design of Multi-Storied Building

EVALUATION OF NONLINEAR STATIC PROCEDURES FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF BUILDINGS

STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (WCCUSD)

CE2401-DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE AND BRICK MASONRY QUESTION BANK

An Experimental Study on the Effect of Opening on Confined Masonry Wall under Cyclic Lateral Loading

GUIDELINES FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN

PAT Construction Technology of High rise Building. Lateral System: Steel Building

9'-2 1/2" 72" Whirlpool Tub Unit 6'-0" 9'-2" x 11'-6" Bathroom. 66" Vanity. 60" Shower 5'-0" 5'-8" Laundry Room 9'-2" x 5'-7" 5'-7 1/2"

K.L. Fashion Ltd. (10982) 75/1, Master Bari, Tongi, Gazipur ( N, E) 01.July.2014

REPORT OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS TECOLUCA, EL SALVADOR. Prepared by: Global Village Engineers

SEISMIC TEST OF CONCRETE BLOCK INFILLED REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES

Wenchuan Earthquake May 12 th, 2008

ENG.ACA.0001F Madras. New Zealand significant. (a) spandrel 2010) were solid

Session 5: Precast Concrete Floors. Rick Henry Courtesy of University of Auckland, Faculty of Engineering

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A TYPICAL LOW-RISE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDING IN THE PHILIPPINES

COLUMNS 1- Definition: The Egyptian code defines columns as : 2- Types of concrete columns

STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF TARA HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (WCCUSD)

Structural Condition Assessment

CONFINED MASONRY CONSTRUCTION

REPORT ON THE DAMAGES ON BUILDINGS FOLLOWING THE SEISMIC EVENT OF 6 TH OF APRIL 2009 TIME 1.32 (UTC) L AQUILA M=5.8 V1.10

No structural deficiencies were observed to the west exterior elevation.

On Cold-Formed Steel Construction. Light Gauge Steel Engineers Association Washington, D.C Toll Free (866)

Utah Knitting & Dyeing Ltd #9533. Boran, Monipur, Mirzapur, Gazipur 03.May.2014

Main Floor Plan Scale: 1/8"=1'-0"

5-story Residential Building

RR Program Summary: Complete renovation with addition and code upgrades for a historic academic building

Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD. Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA

Detailed Seismic Assessment Report. Islington Substation August 2011

CADS A3D MAX. How to model shear walls

KNOXVILLE HISTORIC ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATION

15.2 Approximate Analysis of a Continuous Beam for Gravity Load

Plan Check No. Checked by: An Appointment Is Required for Verification

Here is a rubric to consider.

City of Richmond Zoning Ordinance Page 12-1

Chapter 2 Notation and Terminology

APPENDIX 3E HAZELWOOD HOTEL SPECIFICATIONS

Reinforced Concrete Design. Lecture no. 1

Pushover Analysis of High Rise Reinforced Concrete Building with and without Infill walls

Underpinning. Underpinning

SEISMIC DESIGN OF STRUCTURE

SEAU 5 th Annual Education Conference 1. ASCE Concrete Provisions. Concrete Provisions. Concrete Strengths. Robert Pekelnicky, PE, SE

Earthquake Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Hotel Buildings in Hawaii

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

Pulaski County, Virginia Practical Wall Bracing

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

PRODUCER'S PRODUCE CONCEPT MASTER PLAN 501 North Main, Springfield, Missouri. Prepared for: Joe Costello and Charlie Hoke October 12, 2009

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Tech Report 3 10/17/2014. PSUAE Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

RESIDENTIAL SEISMIC RETROFITS

OREGON BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS TOOL FOR EVALUATION OF SEISMIC REHABILITATION GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATIONS USER S GUIDE APPENDICES

SEISMIC RESPONSE OF A MID RISE RCC BUILDING WITH SOFT STOREY AT GROUND FLOOR

EXPLORATION OF DIFFERENT RETROFITTING OPTIONS FOR RC FRAME BUILDINGS IN KATHMANDU

Christchurch City Council

INSPECT DIRECT Pty Ltd

North Mountain IMS Medical Office Building

Report on Building Damage in Central Ibaraki Prefecture by The 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake Released on April 3, 2011

Ductile Detailing for Earthquake Resistant R C Structures. Dr. S. K. PRASAD Professor of Civil Engineering S.J. College of Engineering Mysore

Temecula Medical Center Temecula, CA

Check the strength of each type of member in the one story steel frame building below.

La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON THE INTERACTION OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES WITH PRECAST-PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FLOOR SYSTEMS

EARTHQUAKE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS OF BUILDINGS. By Ir. Heng Tang Hai

BUILDING INTEGRITY SUMMARY REPORT

KDS IDR Ltd. CDA Plot # 15 (P)+16, Mohora I/A, Chandgaon, Chittagong ( N, E) Survey Date: 11 th March 2015

Technical Assignment #3 November 15, 2004 Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

Damage to urban buildings in zones of intensities VIII and VII during the Wenchuan earthquake and discussion on some typical damages

Table (1) characteristics of magnitude measured by Richter Scale

Structural Investigation Report

MOUNTAIN STATE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD HEADQUARTERS

STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Pentagon Source Material: Mlaker et. al., The Pentagon Building Performance Report, ASCE, 2002.

Thesis Proposal. La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower San Diego, California. December 13, 2013

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #3 November 21,

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF DOVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (WCCUSD)

ARCHITECTURE DARK HORSE GOLF CLUB CLUBHOUSE A4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FRONT PERSPECTIVE / EAST ELEVATION REAR DECK PERSPECTIVE / WEST ELEVATION

MASONRY, ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND BUILDING STANDARDS

SHAKE-TABLE TESTING OF A 3-STORY, FULL-SCALE, REINFORCED MASONRY WALL SYSTEM

THE DISASTERS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 DAVID T. BIGGS, P.E. Principal Ryan-Biggs Associates, P.C. Troy, New York USA

TP: 89'-0" BP: 86'-6 1/4" 2'-0" Typ TP: 89'-0" BP: 86'-6 1/4" 2'-0" Typ S201 TW: 89'-0" TF: 86'-0" S201 TW: 87'-11 1/4" S201 TF: 86'-10 1/4" S201

CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF AN INNOVATIVE STEEL SHEAR WALL SYSTEM

Modelling of RC moment resisting frames with precast-prestressed flooring system

Structural Inspection

Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel Western Podium

TESTS ON AN INTERIOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM-COLUMN JOINT. R. Park*, L. Gaerty**, and E.C. Stevenson***

CRM Homes BUILDER Mangan Drafting Jim Mangan

La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower

Photographer: Richard M. Casella, Historic Documentation Company, Inc., Portsmouth, RI November 2007 DESCRIPTION OF PHOTOGRAPHS

Transcription:

NSF Final Report CMMI-1034874 Project Findings: Appendix 2 Selected Damage Photos of Engineered Buildings PART 1. St. Louis Gonzague Cafeteria Building Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics Department University of Arizona 18 September 2012 1

Fig. A2-1. Plan view of the one-story cafeteria building with column lines indicated. Fig. A2-2. Front view of cafeteria with (1) East dining hall to the left; (2) Kitchen region in center; and (3) West dining hall to the right. 18 September 2012 2

18 September 2012 3

Fig. A2-3. Inner Courtyard: (a) Front View of East Wing; (b,c) Views of East Dining Area; (d) View of Kitchen Area. 18 September 2012 4

H1-3 H1-2 Fig. A2-4. Inner Courtyard Foundation Views: (a) Kitchen showing cantilever pier columns; (b) West Wing showing rip-rap stem wall and pipe supports for outrigger floor beams and roof panels. 18 September 2012 5

J1-5 J1-6 J1-7 J1-8 Fig. A2-5. Cafeteria Exteriors, West Face: (a) Exterior looking toward front of building; (b) Rear. 18 September 2012 6

J-9 I-9 Fig. A2-6. Cafeteria Exteriors: Composite of back (south) face of West Wing. A1-1 A1-0 18 September 2012 7

18 September 2012 8

A1-0 Fig. A2-7. Cafeteria Exteriors East Face, East Front Porch Bay from A1-0 to A1-1: (a) Overall view; (b) Close-up of porch frame top beam showing spalling at top and cracking at bottom of intermediate strut; (d) Close-up of floor beam region indicating in-plane interface cracking of partial height parapet wall. 18 September 2012 9

A1-1 A1-0 a b A1-2 A1-1 18 September 2012 10

A1-2 b A1-1 A1-2 A1-1 b Fig. A2-8. Cafeteria Exteriors East Face, Typical Damage to Window Wall Frame: (a) Horizontal splitting crack along partial height parapet wall; (b) View of typical Bay showing window struts only at quarter points; (c) typical damage at the window strut top; (d) typical damage at the window strut bottom. 18 September 2012 11

A1-3 A1-2 a A1-6 A1-5 b Fig. A2-9. Cafeteria typical damage at window strut bottom: (a) at joint; (b) above joint. 18 September 2012 12

A1-7 A1-6 18 September 2012 13

A1-7 A1-7 18 September 2012 14

A1-6 Fig. A2-10. Cafeteria Exteriors East Face, Rear of East Wing: (a) Overall View (note moment frame A and gravity frame B in interior background); (b) crack in upper beam originating from door jamb; (c) damage to window pier at A1-7; (d) Close up of in-plane failure of window wall column at A1-7; (e) Close up of in-plane failure of window wall column at A1-6. 18 September 2012 15

B-8 B-7 A-8 A-7 A1-8 18 September 2012 16

A1-7 A-7 Fig. A2-11. Cafeteria East Rear Courtyard: (a) Partial/Full Height Masonry Infill Walls at Col Lines 8, 7; (b) Frame at A1-8 (weathering); (c) Column joint damage at A1-7; (d) Column base damage at A-7. 18 September 2012 17

C1-1 C1-2 C1-2 C1-3 Fig. A2-12. Cafeteria Exteriors East Wing West Face, Window Pier damage at C1: (a) in plane damage at column C1-1 and horizontal cracking through pier infill; (b) horizontal crack moves to interface. 18 September 2012 18

C1-4 C1-5 Fig. A2-13. Cafeteria Exteriors East Wing West Face, Typical Window strut damage: (a) top of strut, which occurred always at joint; (b) bottom of strut which sometimes occurred at joint. 18 September 2012 19

C1-5 C1-6 18 September 2012 20

C1-6 C-6 Fig. A2-14. Cafeteria Exteriors East Wing West Face, Window wall damage at rear: (a) View of Bay C1-; showing separation at the end of the window wall; (b) close-up of damage at kitchen interface with pounding damage at C6 visible in the background. 18 September 2012 21

A1-0 A1-1 b a A1-0 Fig. A2-15. Cafeteria Exteriors East Wing East Face from Interior: (a) Bay A1-0, 1; (b) Damage at A1-0. 18 September 2012 22

A1-0 b a A1-1 A1-0 Fig. A2-16. Cafeteria East Wing East Face from Interior at intermediate struts (See Fig. A2-7a for exterior view). 18 September 2012 23

A1-1 b a A1-2 a Fig. A2-17. Cafeteria East Wing East Face from Interior, bay A1-1 to A1-2, indicating in plane (N-S) frame action with significant compression at the leading toe (racking toward rear of building). 18 September 2012 24

A1-2 A1-3 b a a Fig. A2-18. Cafeteria East Wing East Face from Interior, bay A1-2 to A1-3, indicating in plane (N-S) frame action with significant reversal. 18 September 2012 25

b Fig. A2-19. Cafeteria East Wing East Face from Interior, bay A1-5 to A1-6, indicating in plane (N-S) frame action with significant reversal. Fig. A2-20. Cafeteria East Wing East Face from Interior, A1-6 to A1-7 (See Fig. A2-8 for exterior view). 18 September 2012 26

A1-0 A-0 A-1 18 September 2012 27

A-0 A1-0 A-0 A1-0 Fig. A2-21. Cafeteria East Wing North Face: A1-0 to A-0: (a) exterior; (b) interior; (c) parapet damage. 18 September 2012 28

A1-1 A-1 18 September 2012 29

A-1 A1-1 Fig. A2-22. Cafeteria East Porch A1-1 to A-1: (a) Exterior looking south; (b) Interior looking north. 18 September 2012 30

H1-1 H1 H1 H1-1 18 September 2012 31

H1-1 H1 H-0 H1-0 Fig. A2-23. Stair entrance West Wing Column Damage; (a) Overall; (b) Column bases; (c) Upper region; (d) In-plane damage to parapet wall at West Wing Stairs. 18 September 2012 32

Fig. A2-25. Column B-0, part of one bay moment frame at front of East Wing gravity column line B. 18 September 2012 33

Fig. A2-26. West Wing Porch Region at West end: (a) Front view; (b) view down the porch. 18 September 2012 34

J-1 J1-1 18 September 2012 35

J1-1 J1-1 J1-0 Fig. A2-27. West Wing Porch Region at West end. 18 September 2012 36

(a) East Wing between Column Lines A and C (b) West Wing between Column Lines H and J Fig. A2-28. Post-Earthquake State of Partial Height Infill Walls on Column Line 1, Exterior View. 18 September 2012 37

(a) East Wing between Column Lines A and C (b) West Wing between Column Lines H and J Fig. A2-29. Post-Earthquake State of Partial Height Infill Walls on Column Line 1, Interior View. 18 September 2012 38

Fig. A2-30. Post-Earthquake State of Central Columns Line 1: (a) East Wing B; (b) West Wing I. Fig. A2-31. Post-Earthquake State of Central Columns Line 1,West Wing I: (a) damage at joint I1; (b) out of plane failure of masonry infill wall at door jamb. 18 September 2012 39

Fig. A2-32. Close up of post-eq State of Column Line 1 central columns. Buckled bars in joint region #2 ties @ 4 o.c. at col ends No ties in joint (beam projection) Fig. A2-33. Close up of post-eq State of Moment Frame Columns in the dining area. 18 September 2012 40

Roof Barrell Shell Unit Cap Beam Detail Rigid Beam Joint J4 I3 I2 Circular Gravity Column Moment Frame Fig. A2-34a. Vaulted concrete shell roof supported by moment frame at end (column line J with window wall J1 in background) and gravity frame at midspan (circular columns on line I). N-S Gravity Frame E-W Roof Panel N-S Gravity Frame Circular Gravity Column B2 Fig. A2-34b,c. Close-up of top of Gravity column B-2. 18 September 2012 41

Roof Barrell Shell Unit Rigid Beam Joint Window Wall C1 Moment Frame Column C5 Fig. A2-35. Moment frame columns: (a) Line C showing C5; (b) Column A3. 18 September 2012 42

Fig. A2-36. Moment frame columns faces: (a) Line C showing C5; (b) Column A3. 18 September 2012 43

Roof joint damage Spandrel beam splitting Roof joint damage C7 C6 C1-6 H1-6 H6 H7 Pounding damage Pounding damage Window Wall damage Pounding damage Pounding damage Fig. A2-37. Pounding Damage at cafeteria building expansion joints: (a) Column C6; (b) Column H6. 18 September 2012 44

A-7 A-7 18 September 2012 45

B-7 B-7 18 September 2012 46

B-7 C-7 Fig. A2-38. Full-height infill wall along column line 8 (See Fig. A2-9a for exterior view) 18 September 2012 47

B-8 B-7 Fig. A2-39. Framing across the courtyard at column lines 7 and 8 with pounding damage in kitchen wall in the background. 18 September 2012 48

Transverse crack across barrel roof at moment frame beams Longitudinal crack along barrel roof peak Longitudinal crack along barrel roof spandrel 18 September 2012 49

Longitudinal crack along barrel roof spandrel Fig. A2-40. Cracking in Concrete Roof Panels; Map of Roof Panel. 18 September 2012 50

Fig. A2-41. Kitchen Region: Overall Views. 18 September 2012 51

Fig. A2-42. Kitchen Region: (a) Columns; (b) Shear Wall showing shear crack and beam spalling. 18 September 2012 52

Fig. A2-43. Rear of Kitchen: (a) Shear Crack in wall at kitchen rear door; (b) Stairs to bottom level. 18 September 2012 53

Fig. A2-44. Cafeteria SouthEast Exterios: (a) Collapsed sunshade over rear stairs; (b) South east corner showing minimal damage (note repair region). 18 September 2012 54