JCM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 17 July 2013 J. Clin. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/jcm.01357-13 Copyright 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Evaluation of the BD BACTEC MGIT 320 for Detection of Mycobacteria and Drug Susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Abigail Duque 1, S-Y Grace Lin 1, Edward Desmond 1*, Somsak Rienthong 2, Dhanida Rienthong 2 and Chanattree Boonin 2. Microbial Diseases Laboratory, DCDC, CID, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California 1 ; National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Bangkok, Thailand 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 * Corresponding author: Mailing address: Microbial Diseases Laboratory, CDPH, 850 Marina Bay Parkway, Richmond, CA 94804. Phone: 510-412-3781. Fax: 510-412-3704 E-mail: ed.desmond@cdph.ca.gov. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Abstract Two different laboratories evaluated growth and detection of mycobacteria and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the BD BACTEC MGIT 320 using the BD BACTEC MGIT 960 (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD) as a reference method. Out of 359 processed sputum specimens for detection of Mycobacteria, 99.7% were in agreement between the MGIT 320 and MGIT 960. Streptomycin (STR), Isoniazid (INH), Rifampin (RIF), Ethambutol (EMB) (collectively known as SIRE) and Pyrazinamide (PZA) drug susceptibility testing was performed on 89 clinical strains, prepared from both liquid and solid inocula. The results of SIRE and PZA were 100% reproducible between the two instruments tested at both laboratories. 34 35 36 37
38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious global public health problem. Twelve million prevalent cases were reported worldwide in 2010 (5). To achieve early diagnosis and effective treatment of TB, rapid and accurate drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods must be used. The World Health Organization and the U.S. Center for Diseases and Control Prevention have recommended the use of liquid culture systems for DST and for improving time-to-detection (2,6). DST of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) with the BD BACTEC MGIT 960 system produces accurate results more rapidly than the conventional agar proportion method (3,4). The BD BACTEC MGIT 320 contains only one drawer, holds 320 MGIT tubes, can be placed on a bench top and uses the same technology as the MGIT 960. It is designed for laboratories with limited space and workload. For example, MGIT 320 could be used by a laboratory that cultures up to 40 mycobacteriology specimens per week, with an incubation period of six weeks, and performs up to five drug susceptibility tests per week. From April 2010 to February 2011, a study was conducted by the Microbial Diseases Laboratory (MDL) of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (NTRL) of Bangkok, Thailand, to evaluate the performance of MGIT 320 for detection of mycobacteria and DST for Streptomycin, Isoniazid, Rifampin, Ethambutol (collectively known as SIRE) and Pyrazinamide (PZA). Here we report these results using the MGIT 960 as a reference. This study compared the growth detection of mycobacteria and DST performance of the MGIT 320 with the MGIT 960. Sputum samples were processed by the N-acetyl- L-cysteine (NALC)-NaOH method (6), and inoculated in parallel for growth detection in both MGIT instruments and also inoculated on solid media. The growth in instrument-
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 positive MGIT tubes was stained for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and identified. Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex was accomplished at MDL by use of a molecular beacons assay (7) and at the NTRL by the presence of characteristic cording morphology, growth rate, and lack of pigmentation. Isolates of various drug susceptibility profiles were chosen and prepared in parallel for DST. DST inocula were prepared from both solid (Lowenstein Jensen or LJ) and liquid (MGIT) media following the manufacturer s protocol. The SIRE and PZA results by MGIT 320 were compared with those by MGIT 960. Any discrepancies were repeated once for final data analysis. For growth detection of Mycobacterium species, the NTRL tested 359 sputum specimens. For DST, the two laboratories tested a total of 89 strains including 35 pansusceptible strains and 54 resistant strains with various patterns of drug resistance. The NTRL tested 33 strains using MGIT as the source of inoculum and 30 strains using LJ as the source of inoculum. The MDL tested 27 strains in parallel, one set using LJ and the other set using MGIT as the source of inoculum. For growth detection, 0.8 ml of BD PANTA antibiotic mixture was added to each MGIT tube to be inoculated with 0.5 ml of a processed sputum. For DST preparation, 0.8 ml of growth supplement provided in the SIRE or PZA kits and 0.1 ml of the specific drug were added to each MGIT or PZA media tube. Each isolate was prepared in DST sets of 5 tubes (control and SIRE) and 2 tubes (control and PZA). The control tube contained growth supplement without drug. The test concentrations for SIRE were STR 1.0 µg/ml, INH 0.1 µg/ml, RIF 1.0 µg/ml, EMB 5.0 µg/ml and that of PZA was 100 µg/ml.
84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 The 359 sputum specimens were processed using the NALC-NaOH decontamination/digestion method. After specimen processing, 0.5 ml of the concentrated sputum sediment was added to two MGIT tubes and one drop to solid medium. One tube was placed in the MGIT 320 and the other in MGIT 960. The solid medium was incubated at 35-38ºC. Inocula for DST were prepared from LJ cultures within 14 days of growth detection, and MGIT cultures after 1-5 days of incubation following detection of growth. SIRE and PZA were set up in parallel sets following the BD package insert protocols. One set was placed in the MGIT 320, the other placed simultaneously in MGIT 960. M. tuberculosis, H37Rv (ATCC 27294), was set up once every week for SIRE and PZA as a quality control (QC) strain using the same procedure as the test strains. If the QC strain did not yield pan-susceptible results for SIRE and PZA, strains tested the same week as the failed QC results were repeated. Isolates producing any discrepancies in DST results between the two instruments or yielding error codes were repeated once. NTRL. Table 1 shows NTRL s comparison of the MGIT 320 and the MGIT 960 when preparing SIRE DST sets from liquid MGIT media, and table 2 shows the comparison with inoculum prepared from solid LJ media. 564 total DST results were generated from 282 parallel sets of cultures between the two instruments. All results (from all 286 parallel sets) were in 100% agreement. Table 4 shows the growth agreement between the MGIT 320 and MGIT 960. Out of 359 processed sputum sediments, 216 tested as true negatives and 134 as true mycobacteria positives. One discrepancy occurred, testing negative by MGIT 320 and identified as non-tuberculosis Mycobacterium (NTM) by MGIT 960. Eight sputum
107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 specimens were contaminated with non-mycobacterial contaminants including three MGIT 320 and five MGIT 960 cultures. The contamination rates in MGIT 320 (0.8%) and in MGIT 960 (1.4%) were similar, and the difference was not considered to be due to instrumentation. Three out of the four NTMs isolated were identified as Group III nonphotochromogens and one was a group II scotochromogen. Overall, growth data between the MGIT 320 and MGIT 960 were in 99.7% agreement. MDL. Table 3 shows MDL s comparison data. Each system produced 135 DST results. IRE and PZA were all in 100% agreement between the two instruments as well as the archived results. A discrepancy occurred between Streptomycin from the same isolate, inoculated from different media. The strain tested STR-susceptible by MGIT 960 but resistant by MGIT 320 with growth units of 374 and 121 for inoculum prepared from positive MGIT and LJ, respectively. After retesting, the strain tested susceptible by both MGIT 960 and MGIT 320, which was concordant with the archived results. A 100% correlation was realized for SIRE and PZA between MGIT 320 and MGIT 960 after discrepancy resolution (or 99.3% correlation before discrepancy resolution [268/270 total]). The correlation of Mycobacteria detection from processed sputum and DST SIRE and PZA results between the MGIT 320 and MGIT 960 using both types of media was excellent. Although Streptomycin resulted in a single discrepant strain, 100% agreement was realized after re-testing. The isolate that initially tested STR-resistant may have possibly been a borderline STR-resistant strain, suggested by the growth units of the STR drug tubes under 400 (374 and 121). Overall, reproducibility of DST results was nearly perfect for all five drugs tested. The results from this study verify the equivalency
130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 between the MGIT 320 and MGIT 960. Note that while the instrument cost and space requirements for the MGIT 320 will be less than that of the 960, some of the same constraints will apply in resource-limited settings, namely the cost of MGIT media and supplements and the need for a containment laboratory with well-trained personnel and rigorous safety precautions. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Materials used in this study were provided by BD Diagnostics (Sparks, MD). REFERENCES 1. Scarparo, C., P. Ricordi, G. Ruggiero, and P. Piccoli. 2004. Evaluation of the Fully Automated BACTEC MGIT 960 System for Testing Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Pyrazinamide, Streptomycin, Isoniazid, Rifampin, and Ethambutol and Comparison with the Radiometric BACTEC 460TB Method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1109-1114. 143 144 145 146 2. Tenover, F.C., J.C. Crawford, R.E. Huebner, L.H. Geiter, R. Horsburgh, Jr., and R. Good. 1993. The resurgence of tuberculosis: is your laboratory ready? J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:767-770. 147 148 149 150 151 152 3. Tortoli, E., M. Benedetti, A. Fontanelli, and M.T. Simonetti. 2002. Evaluation of Automated BACTEC MGIT 960 System for Testing Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Four Major Antituberculous Drugs: Comparison with the Radiometric BACTEC 460TB Method and the Agar Plate Method Proportion. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 607-610.
153 154 155 4. World Health Organization. 2011. WHO report Global tuberculosis control 2011. The sixteenth global report of tuberculosis. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 5. World Health Organization. 2007. Use of liquid TB culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST) in low and medium income settings. Summary report of the expert group meeting on the use of liquid culture media. 26 March 2007. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. 6. Kent, P.T., and G.T. Kubica. 1985. Public Health Mycobacteriology: a guide for the level III laboratory. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control. 7. Lin, S-Y, W. Probert, M. Lo, and E. Desmond. 2004. Rapid detection of isoniazid and rifampin resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex from cultures or smear-positive sputa by molecular beacons. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 42(9): 4204-4208.
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 Table 1. NTRL Comparison of MGIT 960 and MGIT 320 DST Results (MGIT inoculum) MGIT 960 NTRL S R OVERALL % AGREEMENT STR S 26 0 R 0 7 100 (33/33) MGIT 320 INH S 24 0 R 0 9 100 (33/33) RIF S 30 0 R 0 3 100 (33/33) EMB S 32 0 R 0 1 100 (33/33) Table 2. NTRL Comparison of MGIT 960 and MGIT 320 DST Results (LJ inoculum) MGIT 960 NTRL S R OVERALL % AGREEMENT STR S 25 0 R 0 5 100 (30/30) INH S 24 0 R 0 6 100 (30/30) MGIT 320 S 28 0 RIF R 0 2 100 (30/30) EMB S 29 0 R 0 1 100 (30/30) PZA S 30 0 R 0 0 100 (30/30) Table 3. MDL Comparison of MGIT 960 and MGIT 320 DST Results 1 MGIT 960 MDL S R OVERALL % AGREEMENT STR S 21 0 96.3 (26/27) R 1* 5 *100% agreement when re-tested MGIT 320 INH S 18 0 R 0 9 100 (27/27) RIF S 22 0 R 0 5 100 (27/27) EMB S 24 0 R 0 3 100 (27/27)
180 181 182 183 184 185 186 PZA S 25 0 R 0 2 1 Results were the same for both MGIT and LJ media. 100 (27/27) Table 4. NTRL Growth Agreement between MGIT 320 and MGIT 960 MGIT 960 MGIT 320 NO GROWTH GROWTH NO GROWTH 216 1 GROWTH 0 134