LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test

Similar documents
Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Envoke Weed Control/Crop Tolerance Test

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Spring Burndown Test

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles

4/11/2010 (C4 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia. Palmer amaranth seed return as impacted by weed management program.

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel

Adjuvant Studies in Soybean

University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service

Previous Crops Previous Pesticides Year 1. soybean various 2002

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Corn

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Rattail fescue control in chemical fallow

2016 Demonstration of the herbicide components in dicamba soybean, PRE plus POST and POST only applied at 3 and 6 inch weed at Rochester, MN.

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

(21 08 CRRLL-21 Corn Herb Study Cadet Resource) Site Description Northeast Research & Extension Center

Evaluation of the "Fit" of Amber and Rave in Tall Fescue Pastures

Cucumber No-Till Weed Management Study.

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions Date 5/5 5/25 6/1 6/12 Treatment POST II (C) PRE (A) POST I (B)

THE EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON HERBICIDE EFFICACY AND OAT YIELD I

1/17/2010 (Veg27 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 6 University of Georgia Weed and pepper response to a potentially new fumigant.

Treatment Date June 3 June 28 July 8 July 19 July 29

SUGARCANE WEED MANAGEMENT

where as pyroxasulfone at lbai/a and Dual at 1.2 lbai/a failed to provide acceptable control (63% and 33% respectively)

Foliar Nitrogen Fertilization of Irrigated Maize University of Nebraska South Central Agricultural Laboratory

(TA-05-03) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Osprey tank mix study -- broadleaf control. Phone No:

Effect of Linex Application Rate and Timing on Sweetpotato Katie Jennings NC State University

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO. Joel Felix Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2009.

Sugarcane Fertilizer Recommendations. R. Johnson, H.Viator, B. Legendre

University of Illinois Crop Sciences Department ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF FUNGICIDES ON CORN YIELD AND DISEASE

There were no apparent differences in corn stand. No corn injury was observed on May 25. However, on June 5, 3 to 10% injury was observed with EPOST

Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 19/May/2003

Influence of rainfall amount, rainfall timing, organic matter, and soil ph on sulfentrazone dry pea injury and yield (2004)

Comparison of "Full Load" Glyphosate Formulations in Roundup Ready Soybean - Waterhemp.

No significant differences in corn stand between treatments were determined. No PRE applied treatment caused corn injury when observed on May 29,

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions in Date 5/4 5/24 6/2 6/17 Treatment Temperature (F) Relative Humidity (%)

WEED MANAGEMENT AND BIOLOGY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE

WEED CONTROL IN PROCESSING VEGETABLES RESEARCH RESULTS 2012 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2015)

WEED CONTROL RESEARCH WITH LABELED AND NEW HERBICIDES

Soil Moisture: Moist Emergence Date: 13/May/2003. Pest Description Pest 1 Type: W Code: ABUTH Abutilon theophrasti Common Name: Velvetleaf

WEED MANAGEMENT IN CARROTS, RED BEETS, VINE CROPS, COLE CROPS, TOMATOES, PEPPERS AND SWEET CORN. Grant Number: CORD Reference #: CORD 9026

Performance of Flumioxazin on Lychee. IR-4 Project: P Submitted by: Wilfredo Robles, University of PR, Mayaguez.

WEED CONTROL IN PROCESSING VEGETABLES RESEARCH RESULTS 2009 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2009 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN COLLEGE FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

WEED CONTROL IN PROCESSING VEGETABLES RESEARCH RESULTS 2010 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

CONCLUSIONS

Roundup ProMax for Henbit, Mouseear Chickweed, and Seedling Tall Fescue Control

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2011 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, UNIV. GUELPH, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

California Pepper Commission Complete Annual Report, 2011

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2010 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, UNIV. GUELPH, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

HERBICIDE SCREENING TRIALS IN GARBANZO BEANS. Kurt Hembree 1. Objective: Evaluate preemergent herbicides for weed control and crop response.

Influence of Different Herbicides on Weeds and Dry Beans at Scottsbluff, NE during the 2008 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

2007 Pasture and rangeland results.pdf 1

PREEMERGENCE AND POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN FIELD CORN

HERBICIDE COMBINATIONS AND ADJUVANTS FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN GLYPHOSATE-RESISTANT SUGAR BEET

2005 Annual Research Report. Refinement of Roadside Vegetation Management Practices in Oklahoma. Produced under OSU/ODOT Joint Project: 2157

Planting Date vs. Rice Water Weevil Beaumont, TX 2006

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Soybeans

WEED CONTROL IN RED BEETS RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Round Ready Flex Cotton: Glyphosate Tolerance and Weed Management

Foliar Fungicide Study Block 5S Beaumont, TX 2009

Foliar applied insecticide control of the Soybean Aphid (2011) Summary Background

Spring Canola Seeding Rates

2014 Giant Ragweed Control with Diflexx Herbicide in Field Corn in Rochester, MN.

OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

HERBICIDE EVALUATION IN ARKANSAS COTTON, 1999

(01-ASC-10) Common ragweed leaf no. - numerous height (inch) - 2-4

Calibration of Sugarcane Sprayers

WEED CONTROL IN PUMPKINS & SQUASH RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Evaluation of Herbicides for Greens Crops, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins and Angela Harrison. Interpretative Summary

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Corn. Dewitt, MI Average Corn Yield. Field 1. Field 2. Location: Dewitt, MI (2015)

R. Allen Straw, SW VA AREC, VPI Farm Rd., Glade Spring, VA 24340,

Using Applied Research on Your Farm

These data will be used to support the URMULE submission to register Callisto on highbush blueberry.

Weed Management in Strip-Tillage Corn.

Vernon Center Technical Report # prepared by. Brian Olson John Sij Todd Baughman

DEVELOPMENT OF NEW HERBICIDE OPTIONS FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO PRODUCTION

Treatment Date June 3 June 27 Application Preemergence Postemergence

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE. In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station

Use of Residual Herbicides for Tough to Control Weeds in Snap Beans Final Report for 2012

IR-4 MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page 1

Project Number: 13K Weed control in vegetable seed crops. Tim Miller and Carl Libbey, WSU NWREC. Reporting Period:

Foliar applied insecticides, application rates, and application timings for the control of the Soybean Aphid insecticide (2016)

Cotton population and yield following rye and crimson clover termination with roller/crimper and herbicides in an Alabama no-till system

Conducted Under GEP (Y/N): Y Guideline Description: To Protocol

Efficacy, Crop Safety, and Yield Trials Conducted As Part of The Oregon Seed Council Research & Regulatory Program

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN 2007

The research objectives are to evaluate the effectiveness of various approaches for Palmer amaranth control.

Weed Control in No-Till Pumpkins

EVALUATION OF REDUCED APPLICATION RATES OF ACETOCHLOR TO REDUCE CONCENTRATION IN TILE DRAINAGE WATER

BUR CUCUMBER CONTROL IN CORN WITH POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES

BILLET PLANTING RESEARCH

OPVC FINAL PROJECT REPORT: 2016 PROJECT YEAR: 1 of 1. Project Title: Tolerance of Carrots to Bicyclopyrone and Tolpyralate, 2016

2017 Turfgrass Proceedings

Seeded Cover Crops in Sugarbeet

SUGAR CROPS PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AT THE IBERIA RESEARCH STATION. Iberia Research Station Jeanerette, LA 2

COTTON HERBICIDE SUGGESTIONS Read and follow all label directions before product use. Products with Residual Control Highlighted in Yellow

Flue-cured Tobacco Layby Herbicide Evaluation

Evaluating Corn Row Spacing and Plant Population in thetexas Panhandle

Sugarcane: Winter Weed Control, Herbicide Updates, and New Weed Problems. Jim Griffin

Transcription:

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test Experiment number... : 01SC08JG Location... : St. Gabriel Research Station - St. Gabriel, LA Experimental design... : Randomized complete block Number of reps... : 4 Plot size... : 12 x 40 Row width/# per plot... : 72 /2 Soil type... : silt loam %OM... : 1.0 ph... : 5.9 Planting date... : 09-13-00 Harvest date... : 12-11-01 Crop/Variety... : Sugarcane/LCP85-384 (plant cane) Uniform std. treatment... : N/A Application type... : PRE POST1 POST2 Layby Date applied (mm/dd/yy)... : 04-04-01 04-12-01 05-02-01 05-16-01 Time (hh:mm-hh:mm)... : 12:00-4:00 pm 8:05-9:15 am 12:00-1:00 pm 2:45-3:00 pm Incorporation equipment... : N/A N/A N/A N/A Incorporation depth... : N/A N/A N/A N/A Air/Soil temperature (F)... : 85/77 80/67 89/72 94/77 Wind (mph, direction)... : 5/SW 5/S 6/S 1/S Cloud cover (%)... : 40 70 50 40 Relative humidity (%)... : 68 82 62 48 Soil/Leaf surface moist... : dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry dry/dry Crop stage/height... : 5-8" to collar 7-11 to collar 8-15" to collar 13-19 to collar Sprayer type/mph... : trctrca/3.75 bkpckco 2 /3.4 trctrca/3.75 trctrca/3.75 Nozzle type/size... : FF/8002VS FF/11002VS FF/8002VS FF/OC-04 Boom ht/#noz/sp. (in)... : 18 /3/36 18 /3/15 18 /3/12 40 /2/72 GPA/psi... : 20/33 20/32 20/33 10/28 Applied by... : Jones Siebert/Jones Jones Siebert Weed species (population) ---------(height/# leaves)----------- N/A Rainfall (in.) 0-24 hr/1-3 days... : 0.00/0.31 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.00 4-7 days/2nd week... : 2.29/0.00 0.00/2.05 0.38/0.00 0.19/0.00 3rd week/4th week... : 0.00/0.00 0.00/0.38 0.19/0.00 5.90/15.01

Comments: Injury ratings for April 27 were reflective of herbicide treatments applied on April 4 (PRE) and on April 12 (POST1). Significant injury was observed for Valor applied April 12 (20%), but injury for the same rate applied April 4 was 7%. Application of Regiment on April 12 injured sugarcane 44%. Injury was no more than 14% for the Velpar K4 treatments. For the May 29 rating date, sugarcane was injured when Valor was applied at POST2 27 days earlier (28%) and when Valor was applied twice on April 4 and at layby on May 16 (25%). Sugarcane injury at the May rating was 78% where Regiment was applied in mid-april. Sugarcane yield and sugar yield were significantly reduced when Valor was applied at POST1, POST2, or PRE followed by layby compared with only a PRE application. Even so, yields for these treatments were equal to the standard of Prowl + Karmex applied PRE in April and at layby in May. Sugarcane and sugar yields for the Velpar K4 treatments were also equal to the Prowl + Karmex standard. The excessive injury observed with Regiment resulted in a sugar yield reduction of 36% compared with the standard. Results clearly show that application of Valor over-the-top of sugarcane in mid-april should be avoided.

Cane Cane Cane Cane injury injury injury height % % % cm Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Appl 04-16-01 04-27-01 05-29-01 09-13-01 No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Code 12DAPRE 23DAPRE 27DAPRE 1 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 6 cd 7 de 9 cd 131.60 ab 2 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 31 a 20 b 16 c 130.65 ab Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/a POST1 3 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 1 d 1 ef 28 b 128.57 abc Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/a POST2 4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 8 bcd 6 de 25 b 123.70 c Agridex L 10 % v/v PRE Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/a Layby 5 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a PRE 14 bc 9 cd 3 d 130.38 ab 6 Atrazine 4 L 1.5 lb ai/a PRE 17 b 14 c 9 cd 129.77 ab Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a POST1 7 Atrazine 4 L 1.5 lb ai/a PRE 3 d 0 f 13 c 129.45 ab Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a POST2 8 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a PRE 10 bcd 6 de 8 cd 127.32 bc Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a Layby

Cane Cane Cane Cane injury injury injury height % % % cm Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Appl 04-16-01 04-27-01 05-29-01 09-13-01 No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Code 12DAPRE 23DAPRE 27DAPRE 9 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 10 bcd 5 def 3 d 132.85 a 10 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 18 b 44 a 78 a 118.38 d Regiment 80 S 0.020 lb ai/a POST1 Kinetic L 0.125 % v/v POST1 Layby L 1.0 % v/v Layby LSD (P=.05) 9.5 5.0 7.4 4.700 Standard Deviation 6.6 3.4 5.1 3.239 CV 55.65 30.88 26.98 2.53 Replicate F 0.414 1.484 3.930 3.867 Replicate Prob(F) 0.7446 0.2419 0.0194 0.0201 Treatment F 7.302 55.715 76.215 7.013 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

Cane Cane Cane yield TRS sugar yield Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Appl ton/a lbs/ton lbs/a No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Code 12-11-01 12-11-01 12-11-01 1 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 49.2 a 232 a 11397 a 2 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 45.2 b 209 b 9448 c Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/a POST1 3 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 42.9 b 211 ab 9075 c Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/a POST2 4 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 42.1 b 211 ab 8915 c Agridex L 10 % v/v PRE Valor 50 WP 0.25 lb ai/a Layby 5 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a PRE 50.1 a 222 ab 11118 ab 6 Atrazine 4 L 1.5 lb ai/a PRE 44.4 b 226 ab 10029 bc Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a POST1 7 Atrazine 4 L 1.5 lb ai/a PRE 50.0 a 217 ab 10840 ab Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a POST2 8 Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a PRE 43.0 b 223 ab 9580 c Velpar K4 60 DF 2.4 lb ai/a Layby

Cane Cane Cane yield TRS sugar yield Trt Treatment Form Fm Rate Appl ton/a lbs/ton lbs/a No Name Amt Ds Rate Unit Code 12-11-01 12-11-01 12-11-01 9 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 48.9 a 206 b 10083 bc 10 Prowl 3.3 EC 3.0 lb ai/a PRE 30.1 c 214 ab 6429 d Regiment 80 S 0.020 lb ai/a POST1 Kinetic L 0.125 % v/v POST1 Layby L 1.0 % v/v Layby LSD (P=.05) 3.66 18.4 1155.6 Standard Deviation 2.52 12.7 796.4 CV 5.66 5.83 8.22 Replicate F 1.259 0.575 0.963 Replicate Prob(F) 0.3082 0.6363 0.4244 Treatment F 22.447 1.670 12.774 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.1455 0.0001