Crop Yield & Production Trends in Western Canada. R.J. Graf March 2013

Similar documents
Crop Yield & Production Trends in Western Canada. R.J. Graf March 2013

AAFC and the Future of Cereal Breeding

IN CANADA 2017 GROWING SEASON Canadian Wheat Crop in Review

Procedures for Evaluation and Recommendation for Registration of Cultivars of Field Pea for Western Canada, 2017

Factors that influence crop selection

THE GROWTH OF OATS. A Production Handbook

Participatory Plant Breeding Oat Selection Manual

Is blackleg creeping back? what we know/don t know and how to mitigate the risk?

How do Canadian growers manage blackleg, club root and sclerotinia in canola? Dr. Lone Buchwaldt

Exploring Options for Producer Involvement in Wheat and Barley Variety Development

Canola After Pulse Crops

Manitoba Flax Production

Don't Gamble With Fertilizer Rates!

2017 Annual Report for the Agriculture Demonstration of Practices and Technologies (ADOPT) Program

Agronomic, Economic and Environmental Benefits of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management

THE GROWTH OF. Oats. A Production Handbook. A Production Handbook

The Agronomic & Financial Benefits of One-Pass Seeding with the Bourgault Mid Row Bander Seeding System

Using Good Agronomic Practices to Managing Fusarium Head Blight in Durum Wheat When Using Bin Run Seed. Project # ADOPT 2015

Optimizing agronomic practices to improve yield and quality of malting barley. John O Donovan, AAFC, Lacombe, AB

CANADIAN 2017 WHEAT RESEARCH PRIORITIES OUTLOOK

OVERVIEW OF THE WHEAT SECTOR IN MANITOBA. Wheat is one of Manitoba s most important crops and occupies the largest area of crop by area.

Funding breeding research in Canadian Pulses Carl Potts Executive Director April 5, /8/2013 1

RETURNS TO RESEARCH WESTERN GRAINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION WHEAT AND BARLEY CHECK-OFFS. Funded by. Western Grains Research Foundation.

A Tax Incentive for Certified Seed: An Assessment

Cereal Silage Options for Western Canada

Pencil Sketch Alberta Crop Industry Development Fund Ltd.

CANADA: OUTLOOK FOR PRINCIPAL FIELD CROPS December 18, 2017

2016 Annual Report for the Agriculture Demonstration of Practices and Technologies (ADOPT) Program

Agricultural Outlook 2019

MANAGING FIELD CROP DISEASES

CANADA: OUTLOOK FOR PRINCIPAL FIELD CROPS February 16, 2018

Competitiveness of Rapeseed vs. Soybeans The Western Canadian Case

Description of CDC Aixe and CDC Marval spring einkorn wheat cultivars.

Spotlight on AWC-funded

Effects of Pulses in Rotations

CANADA: OUTLOOK FOR PRINCIPAL FIELD CROPS November 21, 2018

Virtual Soil Testing What Is It?

Proper Pre-harvest Glyphosate Timing in Wheat. Project #: Final report

AAFC Sector Science Strategies

CANADA: OUTLOOK FOR PRINCIPAL FIELD CROPS October 19, 2018

Herbicide Tolerant Canola: 10 years experience in Canada

RETURNS TO RESEARCH WESTERN GRAINS RESEARCH FOUNDATION WHEAT AND BARLEY VARIETAL DEVELOPMENT

Crop Sequence Considerations When Growing Canola

Canadian Grain Market Outlook

Correlating Soil Microbial Properties with Crop Yields in the Canadian Prairies

Regional Pulse Workshop Feb. 5, 2015, Regina, Saskatchewan

Soy Canada SOYBEAN PROCESSING WORKSHOP PRESENTATION NOVEMBER 16, 2017 BRANDON, MANITOBA

RentPlan Calculating Crop Land Rental Rates

Outline. L8- Agricultural Research Policy. Why is research important? Competitive firms adopt cost saving technologies 1/29/09

MARKET OUTLOOK REPORT Volume 1 Number 1

Funding models for wheat research in Canada. Richard Gray University of Saskatchewan

Agronomic Management Practices For Improving Selection Rate For Malting Barley

The Carbon Footprint of Canadian Crops. Don O Connor (S&T) 2 Consultants Inc. Calgary, Alberta April 11, 2017

Research Drive Saskatoon, SK S7N 3R2 T (306) F (306)

MARKET OUTLOOK REPORT Volume 2 Number 1

BRASETTO. A New Generation for Rye Production. Hybrid Fall Rye. Insights. Highlights

Soybean growth and maturity under varying environmental conditions in Manitoba

Committee Expertise & Staff Leads Trent Whiting. Priority/ Urgency. High/ High. Staff Lead: Dave Carey

Agronomic Research. William May and Tyler Wist AAFC Indian Head and Saskatoon

New Brunswick Census of Agriculture Graphs October 2017

Economics of Increasing Wheat Competitiveness as a Weed Control Weapon

WARC Feb 5, 2004 Brassica species for forages S. Phelps, SAFRR, M. Nielsen, and L. Nielsen, AAFC.

Flax Canada Flax Growers Survey 2006 and Dr. Scott Duguid Morden Research Station

Biomass Accumulation and Nutrient Uptake of Cereals at Different Growth Stages in the Parkland Region of Saskatchewan

Industry Health Indicators - Agriculture. Data Summary

Fusarium Head Blight

Fertility Requirements and Contributions of Pulse Crops. Jeff Schoenau PAg Dept of Soil Science

Fungicide effects on wheat at Conmurra

Sclerotinia Stem Rot of Canola: Challenges and Opportunities

Agronomics & Economics Crop Management Decisions Need Both!

AGRI-News. Magnusson Consulting Group. In this issue: Canadian Wheat Update. Smaller Supplies to Limit Brazil s 2018/19 Soybean Exports

Flax production management in Manitoba. Effect of Seeding Date

Managing wild oat in tame oat through the seeding date and seeding rate of tame oat

ADOPT Final Report-Project # Project Title: Demonstration the Use of Yellowhead Alfalfa in a One-Cut and Two-Cut Harvest System, Year Two

Procedures for Evaluation and Recommendation for Registration of Canadian Cultivars of Buckwheat for Western Canada.

GUIDELINES FOR TESTING AND SUPPORT FOR REGISTRATION OF SWEET LUPIN CULTIVARS

INDUSTRIAL HEMP. Site Information: Location: Dauphin, Manitoba Seeded: May 16, 2003 Cooperator: Robert Baker Harvested: Sept.

2012 SEASON VARIETY EVALUATION TRIALS REPORT GRAINSEARCH / SQP MEMBERS & AFFILIATES ONLY

Rising to the challenge of a growing need. Fungicide solutions for cereals from seeding to harvest.

Variety fact sheet Southern Zone. Razor CL Plus

Soybean Production (Research Experience in southern Alberta)

A Year in Review: 2001 Pest Problems Across Manitoba

Rice Seed Choices, Adoption, and Practices

Malting Barley Grower Best Management Practices:

An Overview of Agriculture in the Rural Municipalities of the Lower Souris River Watershed. Dana Harper Jim Unterschultz Scott Jeffrey

The 2002 Crop Season

CANADA: OUTLOOK FOR PRINCIPAL FIELD CROPS April 23, 2018

Agronomy Update Lethbridge, January 20, Industrial hemp. Jan J. Slaski Ph.D., P.Ag. (Dist.) Vegreville

The Move to a Voluntary Canadian Wheat Board: What Should be Expected? Kate Stiefelmeyer, Janalee Sweetland, Bob Seguin, and Al Mussell

10 Million Acres of Opportunity. Planning for a decade of sustainable growth and innovation in the Canadian soybean industry

Challenges for increasing crop productivity: Farmer & scientist solutions

Practicality of Managing Mycotoxins in our Grain System. Grain Farmers of Ontario

Innovation in the Wheat Industry. Jane DeMarchi Director of Government Affairs for Research and Technology AEIC Spring Meeting April 19, 2012

Genetic improvement of Canadian durum wheat for sustainable production systems

Implication of Reduced Herbicide Rates on Resistance Enrichment in Wild Oat (Avena fatua)

Western Canadian Deduction Annual Report

Demonstrating N Fertilizer Options to Maximize Spring Wheat Yield and Protein

CANARYSEED AGRONOMY in W.E. May Agriculture and Agri-food Canada Indian Head, SK

Industrial hemp: Agronomy backgrounder

Saskatoon Research and Development Centre. Felicitas Katepa-Mupondwa, PhD Director Research, Development, Technology Saskatchewan

Transcription:

Crop Yield & Production Trends in Western Canada R.J. Graf March 213

Crop Yield and Production Trends in Western Canada Data from Canada Grains Council (Statistics Canada). Examined crop production, area harvested and yield of canola and spring wheat from 1964/1965 to present. Actual yield results takes everything into account! YIELD GAINS = better genetics + improved agronomic practices + improved farm machinery + better pesticides + environment, etc. Major publicity on how much wheat yields need to increase in the next 2+ years often only the rate of genetic gain is mentioned. Yield increases represent much more than just genetic gain! What are the on-farm tends in western Canada? Graf 213 2

Data Collection: Statistics Canada Field Crop Reporting Series Data collection 6 times per year Area, Yield, Production: March, June, July, September, November. Stocks: December, March, July/August. Target Population All farms in Canada enumerated in Census of Agriculture. Not institutional, First Nations, farms in NWT, YT, NU & Atlantic. Cross-sectional design Sampling stratified into homogeneous groups: farm size, crop area, etc. Sample Size: March: 13, June: 25, July: 15, (212) Sept.: 11,7 Nov.: 29, Dec.: 1,5 Response is mandatory. Refusal rate = 8-9% In this study: Verified reported Yield by dividing Production / Harvested Area 1981/82 to Present: Difference usually within 3 kg/ha (about.5 bu/ac). Graf 213 3

1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/7 197/71 1971/72 1972/73 1973/74 1974/75 1975/76 1976/77 1977/78 1978/79 1979/8 198/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) Spring Wheat Yields by Province (1964/65-212/13) 35 Spring wheat yield, 1964/65-212/13 Graf 213 3 y = 3.926x + 154.6 y = 26.242x + 158. 25 y = 17.617x + 1437.2 2 15 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 4

1964/65 1965/66 1966/67 1967/68 1968/69 1969/7 197/71 1971/72 1972/73 1973/74 1974/75 1975/76 1976/77 1977/78 1978/79 1979/8 198/81 1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) Canola Yields by Province (1964/65-212/13) 25 Rapeseed / Canola yield, 1964/65-212/13 Graf 213 2 y = 24.19x + 729.67 y = 2.422x + 84.38 15 y = 13.242x + 92.86 1 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 5

Trend Line Analysis 1981/1982 good starting point. 1981: registration of Katepwa CWRS wheat. 1982: registration of Westar B. napus canola. Yield penalty associated with canola quality now overcome. Canola well adapted and agronomic systems established. Another break at 2/21. WGRF wheat investment (1994) starts producing varieties. Hybrid canola starting to be introduced not yet popular. Herbicide tolerant canola on about 5% of acres. Location of break is somewhat arbitrary and will affect results. Trend from 1981/1982 to present is most robust. What changed during the two periods? Graf 213 6

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) Spring Wheat Yields by Province (1981/82-212/13) 35 Spring wheat yield, 1981/82-212/13 Graf 213 3 y = 39.47x + 1862.5 y = 26.874x + 1952 25 y = 22.266x + 1641.1 2 15 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 7

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) Canola Yields by Province (1981/82-212/13) 25 Canola yield, 1981/82-212/13 Graf 213 2 y = 29.943x + 125.9 y = 24.51x + 1119.2 15 y = 17.15x + 168.2 1 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 8

Yield Increases over Time Based on exponential curve fitting Graf 213 AB SK MB PP 1981/82 to 212/13 Spring wheat 63% 42% 43% 43% Canola 8% 45% 66% 56% 1981/82 to 1999/ Spring wheat 4% 26% 14% 25% Canola 21% 5% 42% 18% 2/1 to 212/13 Spring wheat 42% 49% 17% 42% Canola 5% 6% 17% 36% 9

Yield Increases over Time Based on exponential curve fitting Graf 213 AB SK MB PP 1981/82 to 212/13 Spring wheat 63% 42% 43% 43% Canola 8% 45% 66% 56% 1981/82 to 1999/ Spring wheat 4% 26% 14% 25% Canola 21% 5% 42% 18% 2/1 to 212/13 Spring wheat 42% 49% 17% 42% Canola 5% 6% 17% 36% 1

Yield Increases over Time Based on exponential curve fitting Graf 213 AB SK MB PP 1981/82 to 212/13 Spring wheat 63% 42% 43% 43% Canola 8% 45% 66% 56% 1981/82 to 1999/ Spring wheat 4% 26% 14% 25% Canola 21% 5% 42% 18% 2/1 to 212/13 Spring wheat 42% 49% 17% 42% Canola 5% 6% 17% 36% Using percentage increase can be misleading Number of data points and type of curve fitting affects results. Yield of canola is lower than wheat. E.g.: a 5 increase in a penny stock represents a large % increase compared to a 5 increase in a high value stock. 11

Yield Increase per Year Based on exponential curve fitting Graf 213 AB SK MB PP 1981/82 to 212/13 Spring wheat 1.6% 1.1% 1.2% 1.2% Canola 1.9% 1.2% 1.7% 1.4% 1981/82 to 1999/ Spring wheat 1.9% 1.3%.7% 1.3% Canola 1.1%.3% 2.%.9% 2/1 to 212/13 Spring wheat 3.% 3.4% 1.3% 2.9% Canola 3.4% 4.% 1.3% 2.6% 12

Yield Increase per Year Based on exponential curve fitting Graf 213 AB SK MB PP 1981/82 to 212/13 Spring wheat 1.6% 1.1% 1.2% 1.2% Canola 1.9% 1.2% 1.7% 1.4% 1981/82 to 1999/ Spring wheat 1.9% 1.3%.7% 1.3% Canola 1.1%.3% 2.%.9% 2/1 to 212/13 Spring wheat 3.% 3.4% 1.3% 2.9% Canola 3.4% 4.% 1.3% 2.6% 13

Yield Increase per Year Based on exponential curve fitting Graf 213 AB SK MB PP 1981/82 to 212/13 Spring wheat 1.6% 1.1% 1.2% 1.2% Canola 1.9% 1.2% 1.7% 1.4% 1981/82 to 1999/ Spring wheat 1.9% 1.3%.7% 1.3% Canola 1.1%.3% 2.%.9% 2/1 to 212/13 Spring wheat 3.% 3.4% 1.3% 2.9% Canola 3.4% 4.% 1.3% 2.6% Remember that using percentage increase can be misleading 14

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) PP Spring Wheat and Canola Yield (1981/82 212/13) 35 Prairie province spring wheat and canola yield, 1981/82-212/13 Graf 213 3 y = 26.284x + 1825.4 25 2 y = 21.28x + 181.9 15 PP Wheat Yield PP Canola Yield Linear (PP Wheat Yield) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 For this time period (1981/82-212/13): Spring wheat yields increased at a rate of 26.3 kg/ha (.39 bu/ac) per year. Canola yields increased at a rate of 21.2 kg/ha (.38 bu/ac) per year. Linear (PP Canola Yield) 15

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Canola Yield (% Wheat) PP Canola Yield relative to Spring Wheat (1981/82-212/13) 1 Prairie canola yield as a percent of wheat yield, 1981/82-212/13 Graf 213 9 8 7 y =.1745x + 6.64 6 5 4 Based on this method of calculation, canola yields increased.17% per year faster than spring wheat. Canola Yield Linear (Canola Yield) 3 2 1 16

Comments: Spring Wheat 1981/1982 to 1999/2 versus 2/21 to present: What influenced the rate of gain? What was the yield gain per dollar invested? 211/12: Total Wheat Investment = approx. $25 Million. Spring Wheat: WGRF supported varieties start be registered. First CWRS varieties with ND germplasm (McKenzie, Superb, etc.) First semi-dwarf CWRS varieties (Superb, CDC Go, etc.) Wheat midge resistance introduced (Unity, Goodeve, etc.) FHB resistance breeding reduced rate of progress. Graf 213 Source: AAFC 17

Comments: Canola 1981/1982 to 1999/2 versus 2/21 to present: What influenced the rate of gain? What was the yield gain per dollar invested? 211/12: Total Canola Investment = approx. $8 Million. Canola: Excellent weed control with herbicide resistance. Hybrids introduced and eventually predominate. Lower yielding B. rapa (Polish canola) phased out. Increased investment by private industry. Graf 213 Source: CSTA 18

Canola Grown and Managed in Preference to Wheat Given that: The input costs of canola (not just seed) are higher than wheat. There is good potential for excellent net returns from canola. The result has been: Better (best?) management practices are applied to canola. Canola is usually seeded on the best land available. As canola acreage increases the next best available land is likely to be diverted away from wheat (and other crops). Wheat has become a secondary crop that does not necessarily receive the same care as canola. This trend also reduced the observed rate of yield gain in wheat. Graf 213 19

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) PP Spring Wheat Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 3 Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 16 Graf 213 25 14 12 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 2 y = -185.67x + 22197 1 15 8 1 5 For this time period, for every hectare taken out of spring wheat production, total spring wheat production was reduced by 1.3 tonnes. (Average spring wheat yield over period = 2.22 t/ha) y = -179.37x + 11583 6 4 2 2

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) PP Canola Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 3 Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 16 Graf 213 25 14 12 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 2 For this time period, for every added hectare of harvested canola, total canola production increased by 2.8 tonnes. (Average canola yield over period = 1.5 t/ha) 1 15 8 1 y = 162.21x + 1651.6 6 y = 336.85x + 924.73 4 5 2 21

Have Things Changed Since 2/1? 1981/82 to 1999/: Average spring wheat yield = 2.1 t/ha (31.3 bu/ac). Rate of yield increase = 1.25% per year. Average canola yield = 1.3 t/ha (23.2 bu/ac). Rate of yield increase =.92% per year. 2/1 to 212/13: Average spring wheat yield = 2.47 t/ha (36.7 bu/ac). Rate of yield increase = 2.94% per year (1.8 bu/ac per year). Average canola yield = 1.37 t/ha (29.9 bu/ac). Rate of yield increase = 2.62% per year (.78 bu/ac per year). Plant breeding investment required to sustain current overall rates of yield increase (based on 211/12 investments) Wheat: $25 Million per year. Canola: $8 Million per year. Graf 213 22

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) PP Spring Wheat and Canola Yield (2/1 212/13) 35 Prairie province spring wheat and canola yield, 2/1-212/13 Graf 213 3 y = 68.137x + 1996.4 25 2 y = 41.59x + 1349.9 15 PP Wheat Yield PP Canola Yield Linear (PP Wheat Yield) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 For this time period (2/1 212/13): Spring wheat yields increased at a rate of 68.1 kg/ha (1.1 bu/ac) per year. Canola yields increased at a rate of 41.5 kg/ha (.74 bu/ac) per year. Linear (PP Canola Yield) 23

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Canola Yield (% Wheat) PP Canola Yield relative to Spring Wheat (2/1 212/13) 1 Prairie canola yield as a percent of wheat yield, 2/1-212/13 Graf 213 9 8 7 y = -.1928x + 67.921 6 5 4 Based on this method of calculation, canola yields decreased.19% per year relative to spring wheat. Canola Yield Linear (Canola Yield) 3 2 1 24

23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 Yield (kg/ha) Selective Data Mining: S. Wheat and Canola Yield (23/4 211/12) 35 Prairie province spring wheat and canola yield, 23/4-211/12 Graf 213 3 y = 58.561x + 2298 25 2 y = 52.925x + 1479.5 15 PP Wheat Yield PP Canola Yield Linear (PP Wheat Yield) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 For this time period (23/4 211/12): Spring wheat yields increased at a rate of 58.6 kg/ha (.86 bu/ac) per year. Canola yields increased at a rate of 52.9 kg/ha (.94 bu/ac) per year. Linear (PP Canola Yield) 25

23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 Canola Yield (% Wheat) Selective Data Mining: Canola relative to S. Wheat (23/4 211/12) 1 Prairie canola yield as a percent of wheat yield, 23/4-211/12 Graf 213 9 8 7 y =.5364x + 64.562 6 5 4 By doing some cherry-picking of the data, this trend line indicates that canola yields increased.54% faster than spring wheat. Canola Yield Linear (Canola Yield) 3 2 1 26

Questions to Ponder While yield net returns ultimately pay the bills What is disease resistance worth vs. the cost of fungicides? KVD reduced progress in wheat effects of removal just starting. Wheat yield gains were made with current registration system. More difficult to determine differences with less testing. Can t tell the difference? Mediocrity increases. Is there a problem that needs fixing? Yield may increase faster with fewer registration impediments. Every trait added reduces effective population size. What are some of these impediments? Graf 213 27

A Double-Edged Sword Fewer registration impediments may mean faster progress: Every trait added reduces effective population size. What are some of these impediments? Graf 213 Disease resistance: - Stem rust? - Leaf rust? - Stripe rust? - FHB? - Bunt? - Loose smut? - Leaf spots? Agronomics: - Early maturity? - Sprouting tolerance? Pest resistance: - Wheat stem sawfly? - Wheat midge? - Wheat curl mite? Quality: - Sprouting resistance? - Protein content? - Milling yield? - Consistency? Every trait added will slow down progress in other traits. What are the benefits/costs for these and other traits? Is the added cost of fungicides, potential grade loss, etc. offset by higher yields? 28

A Few Basic Conclusions Spring wheat yields have not stagnated in western Canada. On-farm spring wheat and canola yields have increased substantially, particularly since 2/1. Observed rates of on-farm yield increase were faster from 2/1 212/13 than 1981/82 1999/ for both crops. 1981/82 1999/: S. wheat yields increased faster than canola. Since 2/1: Rate of canola yield increase is faster than wheat. Environment plays a large role in observing yield potential. Greater breeding investment resulted in higher rates of progress. The registration system for wheat has not been a major bottleneck to the introduction of superior genetics. Graf 213 29

Thank You Dr. Robert Graf Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge Research Centre 543-1 st Avenue South P.O. Box 3 Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1 Tel.: 43-317-2258 E-Mail: robert.graf@agr.gc.ca 3

Supplementary Information 31

1981/82-212/13 complete set of graphs 32

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) Spring Wheat Yields by Province (1981/82-212/13) 35 Spring wheat yield, 1981/82-212/13 Graf 213 3 y = 39.47x + 1862.5 y = 26.874x + 1952 25 y = 22.266x + 1641.1 2 15 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 33

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) Canola Yields by Province (1981/82-212/13) 25 Canola yield, 1981/82-212/13 Graf 213 2 y = 29.943x + 125.9 y = 24.51x + 1119.2 15 y = 17.15x + 168.2 1 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 34

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) PP Spring Wheat and Canola Yield (1981/82-212/13) 35 Prairie province spring wheat and canola yield, 1981/82-212/13 Graf 213 3 y = 26.284x + 1825.4 25 2 y = 21.28x + 181.9 15 PP Wheat Yield PP Canola Yield Linear (PP Wheat Yield) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 For this time period (1981/82 212/13): Spring wheat yields increased at a rate of 26.3 kg/ha (.39 bu/ac) per year. Canola yields increased at a rate of 21.2 kg/ha (.38 bu/ac) per year. Linear (PP Canola Yield) 35

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Canola Yield (% Wheat) PP Canola Yield relative to Spring Wheat (1981/82-212/13) 1 Prairie canola yield as a percent of wheat yield, 1981/82-212/13 Graf 213 9 8 7 y =.1745x + 6.64 6 5 4 Based on this method of calculation, canola yields increased.17% per year faster than spring wheat. Canola Yield Linear (Canola Yield) 3 2 1 36

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) PP Spring Wheat Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 3 Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 16 Graf 213 25 14 12 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 2 y = -185.67x + 22197 1 15 8 1 5 For this time period, for every hectare taken out of spring wheat production, total wheat production was reduced by 1.3 tonnes. (Average spring wheat yield over period = 2.22 t/ha) y = -179.37x + 11583 6 4 2 37

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) PP Canola Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 3 Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 16 Graf 213 25 14 12 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 2 For this time period, for every added hectare of harvested canola, total canola production increased by 2.8 tonnes. (Average canola yield over period = 1.5 t/ha) 1 15 8 1 y = 162.21x + 1651.6 6 y = 336.85x + 924.73 4 5 2 38

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) 3 PP Spring Wheat & Canola: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat & Canola 16 Graf 213 25 2 14 12 1 Wheat Production Canola Production Wheat Area Canola Area Linear (Wheat Production) Linear (Canola Production) Linear (Wheat Area) Linear (Canola Area) 15 8 1 6 4 5 2 39

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) AB Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 8 Alberta: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 4 Graf 213 7 6 y = 55.796x + 565.3 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 y = -16.232x + 266.3 2 3 15 2 1 1 5 4

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) AB Canola: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 8 Alberta: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 y = 4.957x + 812.24 2 3 y = 19.97x + 546.18 15 2 1 1 5 41

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) SK Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 16 Saskatchewan: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 9 Graf 213 14 12 8 7 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 1 6 8 y = -23.23x + 1329 5 4 6 4 y = -131.85x + 6926.5 3 2 2 1 42

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) SK Canola: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 16 Saskatchewan: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 9 Graf 213 14 12 8 7 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 1 6 5 8 4 6 y = 88.352x + 582.3 3 4 y = 16.36x + 21.49 2 2 1 43

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) MB Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 8 Manitoba: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 y = -38.241x + 412.6 2 3 15 2 y = -31.295x + 1996.2 1 1 5 44

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ 2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) MB Canola: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-212/13) 8 Manitoba: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 2 3 15 2 y = 32.95x + 257.3 y = 66.517x + 168.6 1 1 5 45

1981/82 1999/ complete set of graphs 46

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Yield (kg/ha) Spring Wheat Yields by Province (1981/82 1999/) 3 Spring wheat yield, 1981/82-1999/ Graf 213 y = 42.681x + 1859.5 25 y = 15.386x + 249. 2 y = 23.161x + 1661.6 15 1 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 47

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Yield (kg/ha) Canola Yields by Province (1981/82 1999/) 18 Canola yield, 1981/82-1999/ Graf 213 16 y = 26.396x + 199.9 14 y = 13.914x + 1173.4 12 y = 3.4386x + 123.2 1 8 6 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 4 2 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 48

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Yield (kg/ha) PP Spring Wheat and Canola Yield (1981/82 1999/) 3 Prairie province spring wheat and canola yield, 1981/82-1999/ Graf 213 25 y = 25.84x + 1854.1 2 15 y = 12.113x + 1167.9 PP Wheat Yield PP Canola Yield 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 For this time period (1981/82 1999/): Spring wheat yields increased at a rate of 25.8 kg/ha (.38 bu/ac) per year. Canola yields increased at a rate of 12.1 kg/ha (.22 bu/ac) per year. Linear (PP Wheat Yield) Linear (PP Canola Yield) 49

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Canola Yield (% Wheat) PP Canola Yield relative to Spring Wheat (1981/82 1999/) 1 Prairie canola yield as a percent of wheat yield, 1981/82-1999/ Graf 213 9 8 7 6 y = -.2175x + 63.65 5 4 3 Based on this method of calculation, canola yields decreased.22% per year relative to spring wheat. Canola Yield Linear (Canola Yield) 2 1 5

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) PP Spring Wheat Production & Harvested Area (1981/82 1999/) 3 Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 16 Graf 213 25 2 y = -69.639x + 21483 14 12 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 1 y = -151.58x + 1141 15 8 6 1 For this time period, for every hectare taken out of spring wheat production, total spring wheat production was reduced by.46 tonnes. (Average spring wheat yield over period = 2.1 t/ha) 4 5 2 51

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) PP Canola Production & Harvested Area (1981/82 1999/) 3 Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 16 Graf 213 25 14 12 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 2 For this time period, for every added hectare of harvested canola, total canola production increased by 1.54 tonnes (Average canola yield over period = 1.3 t/ha) 1 15 8 6 1 y = 198.86x + 1459.1 4 5 y = 36.72x + 1422.5 2 52

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) 3 PP Spring Wheat & Canola: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82-1999/) Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat & Canola 16 Graf 213 25 2 14 12 1 Wheat Production Canola Production Wheat Area Canola Area Linear (Wheat Production) Linear (Canola Production) Linear (Wheat Area) Linear (Canola Area) 15 8 1 6 4 5 2 53

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) AB Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82 1999/) Alberta: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat Graf 213 8 4 7 y = 83.79x + 494.3 35 Production Area Linear (Production) 6 3 Linear (Area) 5 25 y = -1.533x + 2638.4 4 2 3 15 2 1 1 5 54

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) AB Canola: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82 1999/) 8 Alberta: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 y = 52.73x + 761 2 3 15 2 y = 89.823x + 818.85 1 1 5 55

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) SK Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82 1999/) Saskatchewan: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat Graf 213 16 9 14 8 Production Area 12 y = -144.54x + 12699 7 Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 6 1 y = -125.99x + 696.4 5 8 4 6 3 4 2 2 1 56

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) SK Canola: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82 1999/) 16 Saskatchewan: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 9 Graf 213 14 12 8 7 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 1 6 5 8 4 6 3 4 y = 14.39x + 56.92 2 2 y = 14.66x + 54.24 1 57

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) MB Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82 1999/) 8 Manitoba: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 y = -8.8118x + 3843.2 2 3 y = -15.58x + 1856.4 15 2 1 1 5 58

1981/82 1982/83 1983/84 1984/85 1985/86 1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/9 199/91 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/ Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) MB Canola: Production & Harvested Area (1981/82 1999/) 8 Manitoba: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 2 3 15 2 1 y = 41.77x + 191.16 1 y = 76.241x + 99.412 5 59

2/1-212/13 complete set of graphs 6

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) Spring Wheat Yields by Province (2/1 212/13) 35 Spring wheat yield, 2/1-212/13 Graf 213 y = 78.22x + 23. 3 y = 15.386x + 249. 25 y = 68.681x + 1696.2 2 15 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 61

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) Canola Yields by Province (2/1 212/13) 25 Canola yield, 2/1-212/13 Graf 213 y = 58.791x + 1411.5 2 y = 23.626x + 1573.1 y = 57.143x + 1115.4 15 1 AB MB SK Linear (AB) Linear (MB) Linear (SK) 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 62

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Yield (kg/ha) PP Spring Wheat and Canola Yield (2/1 212/13) 35 Prairie province spring wheat and canola yield, 2/1-212/13 Graf 213 3 y = 68.137x + 1996.4 25 2 y = 41.59x + 1349.9 15 PP Wheat Yield PP Canola Yield Linear (PP Wheat Yield) 1 5 Kg/Ha Bu/ac wheat canola 5 7 9 1 15 18 15 22 27 2 3 36 25 37 45 3 45 54 35 52 62 4 59 71 For this time period (2/1 212/13): Spring wheat yields increased at a rate of 68.1 kg/ha (1.1 bu/ac) per year. Canola yields increased at a rate of 41.5 kg/ha (.74 bu/ac) per year. Linear (PP Canola Yield) 63

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Canola Yield (% Wheat) PP Canola Yield relative to Spring Wheat (2/1 212/13) 1 Prairie canola yield as a percent of wheat yield, 2/1-212/13 Graf 213 9 8 7 y = -.1928x + 67.921 6 5 4 Based on this method of calculation, canola yields decreased.19% per year relative to spring wheat. Canola Yield Linear (Canola Yield) 3 2 1 64

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 Canola Yield (% Wheat) PP Canola Yield relative to Spring Wheat (2/1 211/12) 1 9 Prairie canola yield as a percent of wheat yield, 2/1-211/12 This graph removes the influence of 212/13 Graf 213 8 7 y =.2424x + 65.89 6 5 4 By removing the influence of the relatively poor canola yields in 212/13, the trend line indicates that canola yields increased.24% faster than spring wheat. Canola Yield Linear (Canola Yield) 3 2 1 65

23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 Canola Yield (% Wheat) PP Canola Yield relative to Spring Wheat (23/4 211/12) 1 9 Prairie canola yield as a percent of wheat yield, 23/4-211/12 This graph removes the influence of 2/1, 21/2, 22/3 and 212/13 Graf 213 8 7 y =.5364x + 64.562 6 5 4 By doing some cherry-picking of the data, this trend line indicates that canola yields increased.54% faster than spring wheat. Canola Yield Linear (Canola Yield) 3 2 1 66

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) PP Spring Wheat Production & Harvested Area (2/1 212/13) 3 Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 16 Graf 213 25 14 12 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 2 y = 196.43x + 15342 1 15 8 1 5 y = -15.93x + 752.3 For this time period, despite an average reduction of 15,93 ha/yr in harvested spring wheat area, total spring wheat production rose by 196,43 tonnes/yr. (Average spring wheat yield over period = 2.47 t/ha) 6 4 2 67

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) PP Canola Production & Harvested Area (2/1 212/13) 3 Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 16 Graf 213 25 14 12 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 2 For this time period, for every added hectare of harvested canola, total canola production increased by 2.25 tonnes. (Average canola yield over period = 1.67 t/ha) 1 15 8 y = 338.6x + 3248.4 6 1 y = 759.43x + 479.6 4 5 2 68

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) 3 PP Spring Wheat & Canola: Production & Harvested Area (2/1-212/13) Prairie Provinces: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat & Canola 16 Graf 213 25 2 14 12 1 Wheat Production Canola Production Wheat Area Canola Area Linear (Wheat Production) Linear (Canola Production) Linear (Wheat Area) Linear (Canola Area) 15 8 1 6 4 5 2 69

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) AB Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (2/1 212/13) Alberta: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat Graf 213 8 4 7 y = 225.95x + 479 35 Production Area Linear (Production) 6 3 Linear (Area) 5 25 y = 24.388x + 216.4 4 2 3 15 2 1 1 5 7

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) AB Canola: Production & Harvested Area (2/1 212/13) 8 Alberta: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 y = 114.8x + 976.68 25 4 2 3 y = 292.2x + 1257.1 15 2 1 1 5 71

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) SK Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (2/1 212/13) 16 Saskatchewan: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 9 Graf 213 14 12 8 7 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 1 6 8 y = 42.68x + 769.9 5 4 6 4 y = -85.925x + 443.7 3 2 2 1 72

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) SK Canola: Production & Harvested Area (2/1 212/13) 16 Saskatchewan: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 9 Graf 213 14 12 8 7 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 1 6 5 8 6 y = 18.6x + 1494.8 y = 383.59x + 1553.6 4 3 4 2 2 1 73

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) MB Spring Wheat: Production & Harvested Area (2/1 212/13) 8 Manitoba: Total Production and Harvested Area - Spring Wheat 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 2 3 y = -72.21x + 3562.9 15 2 y = -44.394x + 146.2 1 1 5 74

2/1 21/2 22/3 23/4 24/5 25/6 26/7 27/8 28/9 29/1 21/11 211/12 212/13 Production (tonnes x 1) Harvested Area (Ha x 1) MB Canola: Production & Harvested Area (2/1 212/13) 8 Manitoba: Total Production and Harvested Area - Canola 4 Graf 213 7 6 35 3 Production Area Linear (Production) Linear (Area) 5 25 4 2 3 y = 43.191x + 776.92 15 2 y = 83.823x + 1268.9 1 1 5 75