Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative

Similar documents
Gulf Hypoxia and the Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative

FARM BILL 2002 Colorado Conservation Provisions

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative

National Soil Health Initiative

Conservation Practices. Conservation Choices. These five icons will show the benefits each practice offers... 6/4/2014

USDA NRCS GRP WHIP CSP

NRCS Progress in the Great Lakes Basin (Past, Present and Future)

Natural Resources Conservation Service

NRCS Water Quality Practices

Analysis of Effectiveness of Ohio NRCS Practice Standards in Addressing Five Leading Causes of Water Quality Impairment

NRCS Conservation Programs Update

Efficiency and Conservation in Agricultural Water Use

The 2014 Farm Bill. Texas Watershed Coordinators Roundtable Waco, Texas July 31, 2014

Locally Led Conservation & The Local Work Group. Mark Habiger NRCS

Role of Woody Species in (Riparian) Buffer Plantings

Bastrop & Caldwell County Water Resources

Water Talk Series


N R C S. Farm Bill Projects on Vermont Vegetable and Berry Farms. Natural Resources Conservation Service

Environmental Issues: Opportunities and Challenges for Grazing Dairies. By Kevin Ogles Grazing Specialist NRCS ENTSC Greensboro, NC

Agricultural NPS Measures. Kevin Wagner Aaron Wendt

NRCS Standards and Criteria for Dead Animal Composting

orking Trees for Water Quality

Agroforestry Treasures in the USDA Farm Bill

Conservation Practices for Landlords There is growing concern over the possible

Focus on Financial Resources. Kristin Lambert, WI DNR Chris Miller, NRCS

Seasonal High Tunnels. Conservation Benefits Interim Practice Standard Financial Assistance Guidance

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

Mob Grazing vs. Tight Grazing vs. Low Utilization

Bob Broz University of Missouri Extension

Dust Bowl and USDA - NRCS. Kim Wright USDA-NRCS Program Liaison Bryan, Texas

Voluntary Conservation Works, and Further Water Quality Gains Can Be Achieved

Objectives ALPHABET SOUP A GUIDE TO NRCS PROGRAMS. General Agency Overview Programs & Practices Available Success Stories Questions??

Draft Decision Memo Santiam Junction Maintenance Station Truck Shop Extension

Hungry Creek Watershed Road Maintenance and Stony Quarry Development

Natural Resources Conservation Service

DECISION MEMO JASON MINE-BAT HABITAT IMPROVEMENT AND MINE CLOSURE Section 22, T. 13S., R. 2W. Union County, Illinois

Degradation of the resource Fertility loss Organic matter Tilth degradation. Water quality Sediment Nutrients

PROJECT INFORMATION Manchester Ranger District Apple Tree Release and Maintenance Project

Lambson Draw On/Off Allotment Livestock Conversion Decision Notice

Proposed Action. for the. North 40 Scrub Management Project

DOUGLAS SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN OF WORK JANUARY 1, 2012 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2012

NRCS WATER QUALITY PROGRAM

Woodland Planning for Success

Brief Overview of the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) for Missouri

USDA-NRCS Programs and Interpretation of Haney Soil Health Test Results

CONSERVATION PRACTICES INSTALLED IN THE ILLINOIS RIVER WATERSHED

January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017

Corn Objective Yield Survey Data,

United States and Canadian Cattle and Sheep

Conservation Corner. Announcements. New Website

Planning for Growth and Open Space Conservation

Livestock Watering Systems. Mark Green Lead Resource Conservationist USDA-NRCS Springfield, MO

Soybean Objective Yield Survey Data,

Wetland Functional Assessment- Agricultural Lands. Kim Farrell Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture October 13, 2015

DECISION MEMO FOURTH OF JULY PARK 2 USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Red River Ranger District, Nez Perce National Forest Idaho County, Idaho

Working Lands for Wildlife. Wildlife Habitat Financial Assistance Targeted for the Southwestern Willow Flycatcher

Preliminary Decision Memo Recreation Residence Septic Repairs

Effect of Cattle Grazing, Seeded Grass, and an Herbicide on Ponderosa Pine Seedling Survival and Growth

A Brief Overview of U.S. Agricultural Conservation Policy

How is Water Quality Affected by Land Use?

Local Government Commission California Adaptation Forum

USDA and other Government Agency efforts to Enhance Soil and Water Conservation

Government Conservation Programs

Why does the Forest Service need to propose this activity at this time?

Proposed Action for 30-day Notice and Comment Emerald Ash Borer SLow Ash Mortality (SLAM) Hoosier National Forest Brownstown Ranger District

Livestock Watering Systems

Land Values 2013 Summary

On/Off periods Improvements Grazing System. 2 fence segments. 1 water development, 2 cattle guards

Stonewall Vegetation Project FEIS Errata

Draft Decision Memo OHV Trails 22 and 42 Reroute Project

Role of Soils in Water Quality. Mike Marshall Extension Associate Texas A&M-Institute of Renewable Natural Resources

Technical Training and Certification Program Individual Development Plans for technical employees

Reservoir age, increasing human population,

Watercourses and Wetlands and Agricultural Activities

DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO

Nutrient Management in. A presentation to the West Metro Water Alliance

Drainage Water Management: Optimizing nutrient use while managing risk. Presented by: Rob Sampson NRCS National Water Management Engineer

CARBON FARMING IN MARIN

Wheat Objective Yield Survey Data,

Watershed BMPs. Notes from NRCS online site on BMPs. Focus on key BMPs

The Science of Maryland Agriculture

Decision Memo. North Fork Calispell Creek Restoration Project

Modeling the Impacts of Agricultural Conservation Strategies on Water Quality in the Des Moines Watershed

Agriculture & Water Quality Shifting Perceptions & Shifting Policies

Supervisor s Office 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA

Edge-of-Field Monitoring

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT

Targeting Best Management in Contrasting Watersheds

ANNUAL PLAN MURRAY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT. Slayton, MN. January 1, December 31, 2018

Moonlight Aquatic Organism Passage Project

Tillage Management and Soil Organic Matter

NUTRIENT TRACKING TOOL

Soil Health: Resource Concerns and Conservation Planning. David A. Lamm National Soil Health Team Leader Greensboro, NC

Final Decision Memo. Murphy Meadow Restoration Project. USDA Forest Service Willamette National Forest McKenzie River Ranger District

West Branch LeClerc Creek Watershed Restoration Project Environmental Assessment

Great Lakes Restoration Initiative in Wisconsin

United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service

Puerto Rico - Various

Transcription:

Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watershed Initiative A Progress Report for Arkansas Presented by: Mike Sullivan, State Conservationist

FY 2010 12 States 41 Focus Areas FY 2011 Added two focus areas: SD/MS 7 AR Focus Areas 3 shared with MO 2 shared with LA

Back to the Future Legacy Principles Assess the resources, problems, and opportunities. Draw on various sciences and disciplines and integrate into a plan for the whole property. Work closely with land users so that the plans for conservation reflect their objectives. Through implementing conservation on individual properties, contribute to the overall quality in the watershed.

Arkansas MRBI Focus Watersheds

Primary Cooperative Conservation Partners Project Sponsors Local Conservation Districts Arkansas Association of Conservation Districts Arkansas Association of RC&D Councils The Nature Conservancy Point Remove Irrigation District Monitoring Partners University of Arkansas University of Arkansas Extension Service Arkansas State University Agricultural Research Service

Collaborating Conservation Partners for Projects Conservation Districts 16 Conservation District Associations - 1 Non-Government Organizations - 5 RC&D Councils 3 Associations of RC&D Councils - 1 Arkansas State Agencies - 5 Federal Agencies - 3 Educational Partners - 4 Cities - 1 Irrigation and/or Drainage Districts - 4

MRBI vs General Conservation Programs MRBI Projects proposed and sponsored by conservation partners Partners choose ranking questions Partners choose conservation practices Funding is provided within a specific project area Water quality monitoring and evaluation is included in conservation practices General Programs Funding provided through NRCS without matching contributions from partners State Technical Committee chooses ranking questions Most available practices can be selected by farmers Funding is statewide Water quality monitoring and evaluation is not available

NRCS Conservation Program Funds Dedicated to MRBI Project Total Project Funds L Anguille $1,054,000 Larkin Outlet Creek 1,320,000 Point Remove 4,761,000 Lower St. Francis (1) Lower St. Francis (2) 2,908,836 4,302,275 Little River Ditches 3,156,614 Cache River (CCPI) Cache River (WREP) Middle Bayou Macon Lower Bayou Macon Bayou Boeuf 1,054,000 15,750,000 5,450,000 3,253,000 1,666,317 Total $44,676,042

Project Watershed Approach Total Project Acres Predicted Acres To Be Treated L Anguille 148,783 115,000 Larkin Outlet Creek 14,800 7,400 Point Remove 462,949 48,000 Lower St. Francis (1) Lower St. Francis (2) 482,414 169,611 106,800 53,400 Little River Ditches 214,153 160,500 Cache River (CCPI) Cache River (WREP) Middle Bayou Macon Lower Bayou Macon Bayou Boeuf 156,419 80,113 130,881 28,090 193,805 55,000 10,000 27,700 14,000 116,000 Total 2,082,018 713,800

Avoiding, Controlling, Trapping (ACT) Avoiding ACT Trapping Controlling

Core Conservation Practices AVOIDING 328 - Conservation Crop Rotation 340 - Cover Crop 528 - Prescribed Grazing 590 - Nutrient Management 633 - Waste Utilization CONTROLLING 329 - Residue & Tillage Management - No Till/Strip Till 345 - Residue & Tillage Management - Mulch Till 346 - Residue & Tillage Management - Ridge Till 412 - Grassed Waterway 512 - Forage and Biomass Planting 554 - Drainage Water Management 643 - Restoration & Management of Declining Habitats 645 - Upland Wildlife Habitat Management TRAPPING 390 - Riparian Herbaceous Cover 657 - Wetland Restoration 391 - Riparian Forest Buffer 658 - Wetland Creation 393 - Filter Strip 659 - Wetland Enhancement 656 - Constructed Wetland

Supporting Conservation Practices AVOIDING 313 - Waste Storage Facility 317 - Composting Facility 327 - Conservation Cover 381 - Silvopasture Establishment 382 - Fence 472 - Access Control 511 - Forage Harvest Management 558 - Roof Runoff Structure 561 - Heavy Use Area Protection 612 - Tree & Shrub Planting 632 - Solid/Liquid Waste Separation Facility 634 - Waste Transfer CONTROLLING 324 - Deep Tillage 342 - Critical Area Planting 362 - Diversion 386 - Field Border 410 - Grade Stabilization Structure 430 - Irrigation Water Conveyance 447 - Tailwater Recovery 449 - Irrigation Water Management 468 Lined Waterway or Outlet 484 - Mulching 533 - Pumping Plant 587 - Structure for Water Control 607 - Surface Drainage 620 - Underground Outlet 638 - Water & Sediment Control Basin TRAPPING 342 - Critical Area Planting 533 - Pumping Plant 350 - Sediment Basin 587 - Structure for Water Control 356 - Dike 629 - Waste Treatment 436 - Irrigation Storage Reservoir 638 - Water & Sediment Control Basin 490 - Forest Site Preparation 646 - Shallow Water Development and Management

Conservation Systems Approach CCPI Projects Primary Practices (2010 & 2011) L Anguille Larkin Outlet Creek Irrigation reservoirs, tailwater recovery, pumping plants Cover crops, residue and tillage management Point Remove Lower St. Francis Little River Ditches Cover crops, crop rotation, grass planting, prescribed grazing, stream crossings Nutrient management, irrigation practices Nutrient management

Tailwater Recovery

Nutrient Management Injecting split applications of nitrogen emphasizes the four R s: Right Source of Nutrients, Right Time of Application, Right Rate, and Right Method of Application This practice lines up with the national nutrient management strategy.

Cover Crop Reduce runoff from water erosion Increase soil organic matter content reducing nutrient inputs. Capture and recycle or redistribute nutrients in the soil profile. Promote biological nitrogen fixation and reduce energy use. Increase water quantity and availability for plant uptake. Suppress Weeds. Manage soil moisture. Minimize and reduce soil compaction. Enhance nutrient use efficiency

Expected Water Quality Results Reduced nitrogen and phosphorus loading into waterways Reduced sediment from sheet & rill erosion Reduced sediment from irrigation-induced erosion

Water Quality Monitoring and Evaluation

Water Quality Evaluation and Monitoring Voluntary monitoring to determine effects of conservation practice installation Partnering with University of Arkansas, Arkansas State University, and U.S. Agricultural Research Service Discovery Farm Protocols EPA Specifications 1 or 2 farms per project

Point Remove Wetlands Reclamation and Irrigation District MRBI Project Willow Bend Farm Erosion problems on the Willow Bend Farm 1456 acres of crop/pasture enrolled in EQIP Agricultural waste will be applied according to conservation plan and needs on 1000 acres Grid soil sampling on 1325 acres allow precise management of nutrient application Conservation crop rotation - 320 acres Cover crops - 270 acres Edge of field monitoring I needed NRCS expertise to figure out what works best on this farm. Ruth Spiller

L'Anguille River MRBI Project 85 acres on Crowley s Ridge - gulley erosion WHIP and EQIP contracts Edgar Perry Farm Critical area treatment - level gullies, plant grass on the highly-erodible land Sediment basin to catch debris and sediment and trap nutrients Planting 40 acres in native grasses and managing for upland wildlife habitat Planting trees on 11 acres through the Conservation Reserve Program for a riparian buffer to filter and trap sediments and nutrients NRCS has been great to work with. Edgar Perry

Adaptive Management Adding focus areas or expanding boundaries of areas Adding additional conservation practices as needed Adjusting ranking criteria Annual review of projects with sponsors

Potential Initiative Modifications in Lower Mississippi River Basin for Future Consideration Water management additions/ revisions to current MRBI Multi-state Mississippi River batture lands forestry/wildlife initiative

Potential Areas to Consider

Questions? Follow-up questions can be sent to: Mike Sullivan State Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service Michael.sullivan@ar.usda.gov or call 501-301-3100

To File a Complaint of Discrimination: The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S. W., Stop 9410, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call toll-free at (866) 632-9992 (English) or (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (English Federal-relay) or (800) 845-6136 (Spanish Federal-relay). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.