Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 9. Basic Oligopoly Models

Similar documents
UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST CAPE COAST - GHANA BASIC OLIGOPOLY MODELS

Managerial Economics Chapter 9 Practice Question

OLIGOPOLY: Characteristics

14.1 Comparison of Market Structures

Chapter 14 TRADITIONAL MODELS OF IMPERFECT COMPETITION. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.

Business Economics BUSINESS ECONOMICS. PAPER No. 1: MICROECONOMIC ANALYSIS MODULE No. 24: NON-COLLUSIVE OLIGOPOLY I

11. Oligopoly. Literature: Pindyck and Rubinfeld, Chapter 12 Varian, Chapter 27

ECON6021. Market Structure. Profit Maximization. Monopoly a single firm A patented drug to cure SARS A single power supplier on HK Island

Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

Chapter 15: Industrial Organization

Oligopoly: How do firms behave when there are only a few competitors? These firms produce all or most of their industry s output.

Lecture 2 OLIGOPOLY Copyright 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.

ECON 115. Industrial Organization

INTERMEDIATE MICROECONOMICS LECTURE 13 - MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY. Monopolistic Competition

ECONOMICS. Paper 3 : Fundamentals of Microeconomic Theory Module 28 : Non collusive and Collusive model

9 The optimum of Oligopoly

Chapter 12. Oligopoly. Oligopoly Characteristics. ) of firms Product differentiation may or may not exist ) to entry. Chapter 12 2

Chapter 12: Limit Pricing and Entry Deterrence

The Analysis of Competitive Markets

Prof. Wolfram Elsner Faculty of Business Studies and Economics iino Institute of Institutional and Innovation Economics. Real-World Markets

Recall from last time. Econ 410: Micro Theory. Cournot Equilibrium. The plan for today. Comparing Cournot, Stackelberg, and Bertrand Equilibria

Chapter 13. Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

Chapter 13. Chapter Outline. Some Specific Oligopoly Models : Cournot, Bertrand and Stackelberg Competition When There are Increasing Returns to Scale

Chapter 8 Competitors and Competition

Microeconomics (Oligopoly & Game, Ch 12)

Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 33 Oligopoly (Contd )

Quiz #4 Week 04/05/2009 to 04/11/2009

Econ Microeconomic Analysis and Policy

Market Structure - Oligopoly

Textbook questions: Competitors and Competition

ECN 3103 INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION

Market Structure & Imperfect Competition

Quiz #5 Week 04/12/2009 to 04/18/2009

Chapter 12. Oligopoly. Oligopoly Characteristics. Oligopoly Equilibrium

Use the following to answer question 4:

The Basic Spatial Model with a Single Monopolist

Economics 384 B1. Intermediate Microeconomics II. Assignment 2. S Landon Winter 2007

2007 Thomson South-Western

Unit 6 Perfect Competition and Monopoly - Practice Problems

Overview 11/6/2014. Herfindahl Hirshman index of market concentration ...

Lecture 22. Oligopoly & Monopolistic Competition

Hotelling s (1929) linear city. Hotelling

Market Equilibrium, Price Floor, Price Ceiling

Slides and Images, Worth Publishers Inc. 8-1

FINALTERM EXAMINATION FALL 2006

EconS Oligopoly - Part 1

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Chapter 15 Oligopoly

Lecture 3 OLIGOPOLY (CONTINUED) 13-1 Copyright 2012 Pearson Education. All rights reserved.

29/02/2016. Market structure II- Other types of imperfect competition. What Is Monopolistic Competition? OTHER TYPES OF IMPERFECT COMPETITION

EXAMINATION #4 VERSION C General Equilibrium and Market Power November 24, 2015

REDEEMER S UNIVERSITY

Firm Supply. Market demand. Demand curve facing firm

Contents in Brief. Preface

Economics II - October 27, 2009 Based on H.R.Varian - Intermediate Microeconomics. A Modern Approach

Competition among banks. Managerial Economics MBACatólica

Contents. Concepts of Revenue I-13. About the authors I-5 Preface I-7 Syllabus I-9 Chapter-heads I-11

Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly

Name FIRST HOUR EXAM ECN 4350/6350

Textbook Media Press. CH 12 Taylor: Principles of Economics 3e 1

Entry Deterrence and Predation. Chapter 9: Entry Deterrence and Predation

Oligopoly Pricing. EC 202 Lecture IV. Francesco Nava. January London School of Economics. Nava (LSE) EC 202 Lecture IV Jan / 13

14.54 International Trade Lecture 17: Increasing Returns to Scale

ECONOMICS CHAPTER 9: FORMS OF MARKET

Econ 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics

Handout 1: Monopolistic Competition and International Trade

Final Examination Suggested Solution ECON 201

Lecture 10: Market Power and Monopoly

Chapter 6: Market Structure

Intermediate Microeconomics IMPERFECT COMPETITION BEN VAN KAMMEN, PHD PURDUE UNIVERSITY

Oligopoly. Fun and games. An oligopolist is one of a small number of producers in an industry. The industry is an oligopoly.

Lecture 11: Market Power and Monopoly

Economics 101 Spring 2001 Section 4 - Hallam Quiz 10. For questions 1-9, consider firms using a technology with cost and marginal cost functions:

Economics of Strategy Fifth Edition

Chapter 13. Microeconomics. Monopolistic Competition: The Competitive Model in a More Realistic Setting

ECONOMICS SOLUTION BOOK 2ND PUC. Unit 6. I. Choose the correct answer (each question carries 1 mark)

1. Why is utility subjective? 2. What are inferior options? 3. Suppose the price of A is 1, the price of B is 2 and the price of C is 1.

Lecture 11: Market Power and Monopoly

Unit 13 AP Economics - Practice

MICROECONOMICS - CLUTCH CH PERFECT COMPETITION.

4 Effects of a change in marginal cost (Extra) α β q * 1. The reason is that this is the first-order condition for the firm's choice of quantity.

ECON 102 Kagundu Final Exam (New Material) Practice Exam Solutions

Managerial Economics

INTRODUCTION ECONOMIC PROFITS

Principles of Economics. January 2018

Managerial Economics

Principles of Microeconomics Assignment 8 (Chapter 10) Answer Sheet. Class Day/Time

Part III: Market Structure 12. Monopoly 13. Game Theory and Strategic Play 14. Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A) Fall 2013

Chapter 9: Static Games and Cournot Competition

Econ8500_Imperfect_Competition

UC Berkeley Haas School of Business Economic Analysis for Business Decisions (EWMBA 201A)

ECON 230D2-002 Mid-term 1. Student Number MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

ECON 115. Industrial Organization

Three Rules and Four Models

Three Rules and Four Models

Perfect Competition CHAPTER14

Micro Chapter 10 study guide questions

ECON 311 MICROECONOMICS THEORY I

Transcription:

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 9 Basic Oligopoly Models

Overview I. Conditions for Oligopoly? II. Role of Strategic Interdependence III. Profit Maximization in Four Oligopoly Settings Sweezy (Kinked-Demand) Model Cournot Model Stackelberg Model Bertrand Model IV. Contestable Markets

Oligopoly Environment Relatively few firms, usually less than 10. Duopoly - two firms Triopoly - three firms The products firms offer can be either differentiated or homogeneous. Firms decisions impact one another. Many different strategic variables are modeled: No single oligopoly model.

Role of Strategic Interaction Your actions affect the profits of your rivals. Your rivals actions affect your profits. How will rivals respond to your actions?

An Example You and another firm sell differentiated products. How does the quantity demanded for your product change when you change your price?

P D 2 (Rival matches your price change) P H P 0 P L Q H1 Q H2 Q 0 Q L2 Q L1 D 1 (Rival holds its price constant) Q

P D 2 (Rival matches your price change) Demand if Rivals Match Price Reductions but not Price Increases P 0 Q 0 D D 1 (Rival holds its price constant) Q

Key Insight The effect of a price reduction on the quantity demanded of your product depends upon whether your rivals respond by cutting their prices too! The effect of a price increase on the quantity demanded of your product depends upon whether your rivals respond by raising their prices too! Strategic interdependence: You aren t in complete control of your own destiny!

Sweezy (Kinked-Demand) Model Environment Few firms in the market serving many consumers. Firms produce differentiated products. Barriers to entry. Each firm believes rivals will match (or follow) price reductions, but won t match (or follow) price increases. Key feature of Sweezy Model Price-Rigidity.

Sweezy Demand and Marginal Revenue P D 2 (Rival matches your price change) D S : Sweezy Demand P 0 D 1 (Rival holds its price constant) MR S : Sweezy MR Q 0 MR 2 MR 1 Q

Sweezy Profit-Maximizing Decision P D 2 (Rival matches your price change) P 0 MC 1 MC 2 MC 3 Q 0 MR S D 1 (Rival holds price constant) D S : Sweezy Demand Q

Sweezy Oligopoly Summary Firms believe rivals match price cuts, but not price increases. Firms operating in a Sweezy oligopoly maximize profit by producing where MR S = MC. The kinked-shaped marginal revenue curve implies that there exists a range over which changes in MC will not impact the profit-maximizing level of output. Therefore, the firm may have no incentive to change price provided that marginal cost remains in a given range.

Cournot Model Environment A few firms produce goods that are either perfect substitutes (homogeneous) or imperfect substitutes (differentiated). Firms control variable is output in contrast to price. Each firm believes their rivals will hold output constant if it changes its own output (The output of rivals is viewed as given or fixed ). Barriers to entry exist.

Inverse Demand in a Cournot Duopoly Market demand in a homogeneous-product Cournot duopoly is ( ) P = a b + Thus, each firm s marginal revenue depends on the output produced by the other firm. More formally, MR MR 1 = a bq2 2bQ1 2 = a bq1 2bQ2

Best-Response Function Since a firm s marginal revenue in a homogeneous Cournot oligopoly depends on both its output and its rivals, each firm needs a way to respond to rival s output decisions. Firm 1 s best-response (or reaction) function is a schedule summarizing the amount of firm 1 should produce in order to maximize its profits for each quantity of produced by firm 2. Since the products are substitutes, an increase in firm 2 s output leads to a decrease in the profitmaximizing amount of firm 1 s product.

Best-Response Function for a Cournot Duopoly To find a firm s best-response function, equate its marginal revenue to marginal cost and solve for its output as a function of its rival s output. Firm 1 s best-response function is (c 1 is firm 1 s MC) a c1 1 Q1 = r1 ( Q2 ) = Q2 Firm 2 s best-response function is (c 2 is firm 2 s MC) a c2 1 Q2 = r2 ( Q1 ) = Q1 2b 2b 2 2

Graph of Firm 1 s Best-Response Function (a-c 1 )/b = r 1 ( ) = (a-c 1 )/2b - 0.5 r 1 (Firm 1 s Reaction Function) M

Cournot Equilibrium Situation where each firm produces the output that maximizes its profits, given the the output of rival firms. No firm can gain by unilaterally changing its own output to improve its profit. A point where the two firm s best-response functions intersect.

Graph of Cournot Equilibrium (a-c 1 )/b r 1 M Cournot Equilibrium * r 2 * M (a-c 2 )/b

Summary of Cournot Equilibrium The output * maximizes firm 1 s profits, given that firm 2 produces *. The output * maximizes firm 2 s profits, given that firm 1 produces *. Neither firm has an incentive to change its output, given the output of the rival. Beliefs are consistent: In equilibrium, each firm thinks rivals will stick to their current output and they do!

Firm 1 s Isoprofit Curve The combinations of outputs of the two firms that yield firm 1 the same level of profit r 1 A B D C π 1 = $100 Increasing Profits for Firm 1 π 1 = $200 M

Another Look at Cournot Decisions r 1 Firm 1 s best response to * * π 1 = $100 π 1 = $200 * M

Another Look at Cournot Equilibrium r 1 Firm 2 s Profits M Cournot Equilibrium * Firm 1 s Profits r 2 * M

Impact of Rising Costs on the Cournot Equilibrium r 1 * r 1 ** Cournot equilibrium after firm 1 s marginal cost increase ** Cournot equilibrium prior to firm 1 s marginal cost increase * r 2 ** *

Collusion Incentives in Cournot Oligopoly r 1 Cournot π 2 M Cournot π 1 r 2 M

Stackelberg Model Environment Few firms serving many consumers. Firms produce differentiated or homogeneous products. Barriers to entry. Firm one is the leader. The leader commits to an output before all other firms. Remaining firms are followers. They choose their outputs so as to maximize profits, given the leader s output.

Stackelberg Equilibrium r 1 π 2 C Follower s Profits Decline π F S Stackelberg Equilibrium C S π L S π 1 C r 2 C S M

The Algebra of the Stackelberg Model Since the follower reacts to the leader s output, the follower s output is determined by its reaction function Q a c 2b 2 ( Q1 ) = 0. Q1 2 = r2 5 The Stackelberg leader uses this reaction function to determine its profit maximizing output level, which simplifies to Q 1 a + c 2 = 2b 2c 1

Stackelberg Summary Stackelberg model illustrates how commitment can enhance profits in strategic environments. Leader produces more than the Cournot equilibrium output. Larger market share, higher profits. First-mover advantage. Follower produces less than the Cournot equilibrium output. Smaller market share, lower profits.

Bertrand Model Environment Few firms that sell to many consumers. Firms produce identical products at constant marginal cost. Each firm independently sets its price in order to maximize profits (price is each firms control variable). Barriers to entry exist. Consumers enjoy Perfect information. Zero transaction costs.

Bertrand Equilibrium Firms set P = P 1 2 = MC! Why? Suppose MC < P 1 < P 2. Firm 1 earns (P 1 - MC) on each unit sold, while firm 2 earns nothing. Firm 2 has an incentive to slightly undercut firm 1 s price to capture the entire market. Firm 1 then has an incentive to undercut firm 2 s price. This undercutting continues... Equilibrium: Each firm charges P = P 1 2 = MC.

Contestable Markets Key Assumptions Producers have access to same technology. Consumers respond quickly to price changes. Existing firms cannot respond quickly to entry by lowering price. Absence of sunk costs. Key Implications Threat of entry disciplines firms already in the market. Incumbents have no market power, even if there is only a single incumbent (a monopolist).

Conclusion Different oligopoly scenarios give rise to different optimal strategies and different outcomes. Your optimal price and output depends on Beliefs about the reactions of rivals. Your choice variable (P or Q) and the nature of the product market (differentiated or homogeneous products). Your ability to credibly commit prior to your rivals.