Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes

Similar documents
Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes

P and K Fertilization: Effects on Corn and Soybean Yields and Profitability

Enhancing Continuous Corn Production Under High Residue Conditions with Starter Fluid Fertilizer Combinations and Placement

Enhancing Continuous Corn Production Under High Residue Conditions with Starter Fluid Fertilizer Combinations and Placements

Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota, Waseca

On Farm Assessment of Critical Soil Test Phosphorus and Potassium Values in Minnesota. AFREC Year 4 Summary Report 8/31/2014 for

Institute of Ag Professionals

Gyles Randall Soil Scientist & Professor (Emeritus) Univ. of Minnesota

Corn Early Nutrient Uptake and Yield as Affected by In-Furrow Fluid Potassium Starter. Antonio P. Mallarino Iowa State University

Response to Starter Applied Sulfur in Combination with Nitrogen and Phosphorus across a Landscape

CROP NUTRIENTS FOR EVER-INCREASING YIELDS ARE CURRENT FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS ADEQUATE?

Validation of Ontario s N Fertilizer Recommendations For Corn In High Yielding Environments: 2013 Summary

STARTER POTASSIUM FOR CORN: WHY AND WHEN? Nicolas Bergmann, Antonio P. Mallarino, and Daniel E. Kaiser * Iowa State University, Ames.

CROP ADVANCES Field Crop Reports

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

P & K Research---Soil & Plant Testing Issues Daniel Kaiser Assistant Professor Department of Soil, Water and Climate

FERTILIZING SUGARBEET

Brian Williams Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Nutrient Efficiency and Management Conference February 15,2012 Morton, MN

Phosphorus and Potassium Recommendations for Illinois Crops

Liquid vs Dry Phosphorus Fertilizer Formulations with Air Seeders

Cropping System Nutrient Management

Sidedressing Potassium and Nitrogen on Corn Evaluations made on yield effects.

Should Soil Health Tests be Used in Generating Fertilizer Recommendations?

Fluids: The Keystone Of All Fertility Programs. Dale Leikam

UTILITY OF POLYMER-COATED UREA AS A FALL-APPLIED N FERTILIZER OPTION FOR CORN AND WHEAT

Purdue On-Farm Nitrogen Rate Trial Protocol

Ontario Corn Nitrogen Soil N Survey 2015

MANAGING CHAFF TRAILS AND NITROGEN FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS IN STRIP-TILL SUGAR BEET PRODUCTION

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

Re-evaluating Phosphorus and Potassium Management for Soybeans

Grain Sorghum Fertility Management Lucas Haag Ph.D., Asst. Professor/Northwest Area Agronomist K-State Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby

EVALUATION OF REDUCED APPLICATION RATES OF ACETOCHLOR TO REDUCE CONCENTRATION IN TILE DRAINAGE WATER

CORN RESIDUE HARVESTING EFFECTS ON YIELD RESPONSE TO N FERTILIZATION

Fertility Management of Soybeans

Phosphorus: You have choices! Charles Shapiro Soil Scientist Crop Nutrition

2014 Executive Summary

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Phosphorus Management

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

What Growers Expect from New Product Introductions and Claims

NNY Agricultural Development Program Project Report

Objectives: Background:

On-farm evaluation of fluid starter potassium fertilization for corn using precision agriculture technologies

Improving Cotton Production Efficiency With Phosphorus and Potassium Placement At Multiple Depths in Strip Tillage Systems

Manure P effects on corn growth and changes in soil test levels. Carrie Laboski Soil Science Department Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison

Fall Strip Tillage and Fertilizer Placement

WISCONSIN CORN AND SOYBEAN RESPONSES TO FERTILIZER PLACEMENT IN CONSERVATION TILLAGE SYSTEMS 1/ Richard P. Wolkowski 2/

The value of proper soil testing and use in precision Ag

INFLUENCE OF FERTILIZER RATE AND TIMING ON YIELD, TEST WEIGHT, AND PROTEIN CONTENT OF THREE IRRIGATED HARD RED SPRING WHEAT VARIETIES

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

Spring Wheat Nitrogen Response X Fungicide Interactions

Evaluation of Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Fertilizer Solutions for Tomato and Pepper Production in Florida George J.

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

Optimizing Strip-Till and No-Till Systems for Corn in the Biofuel Era

Although the use of urea ammonium

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT. Figure 1. The availability of P is affected by soil ph.

CROP AVAILABILITY OF SUGAR BEET FACTORY LIME PHOSPHORUS

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTHWESTERN AND WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Exeter Demo Plot: Split vs Single App of Nitrogen, Fungicide or No Fungicide

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

R.G. Hoeft, G.W. Randall, J. Vetsch, E.D. Nafziger F.G. Fernández, and K. Greer 1

RELAY INTERCROP WHEAT-SOYBEAN PRODUCTION UTILIZING GLYPHOSATE AS A WHEAT HARVEST AID TO INCREASE SOYBEAN GRAIN YIELDS AND MAINTAIN WHEAT GRAIN YIELDS

2018 Soybean Planting Date x Variety Trial

Minnesota Wheat Check- Off

Soil Testing for P and K in Annual Crops

2016 Southern Consultants Meeting High Yield Soybean Production

Corn Responds Positively to Rate & Timing of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) & Urea

Optimizing yield while minimizing phosphorus water quality impacts: Some do s and don ts

SULFUR AND NITROGEN FOR PROTEIN BUILDING

CROP ADVANCES Field Crop Reports

Swine Manure Nutrient Utilization Project

Variable Source N Fertilizer Applications to Optimize Crop N Use Efficiency

Advanced Crop Advisers Workshop, Feb , Fargo, ND

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

Tissue Testing Guidelines for Nitrogen Management in Malting Barley, Maricopa, 1998

THIS PRESENTATION: EMPHASIS ON USE OF FLUID STARTERS

N Sentinel: Nitrogen Monitoring for Higher Yields and Greater Nitrogen Use Efficiency

FERTILIZER PLACEMENT OPTIONS FOR IRRIGATED NO-TILL CORN 2005 THE DAKOTA LAKES STAFF

SIDEDRESSING NITROGEN: USEFUL ON ALL SOILS? Larry G. Bundy 1. Introduction

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial SEEDING RATES

IN-FIELD PROFITABILITY ASSESSMENT. Analyses & Tools to Aid Profitable In-Field Outcomes Suzanne Fey Data Analyst

BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGING NITROGEN IN NO-TILL

2011 Protocol for On-Farm Research Trials: Evaluating Early-Applied Foliar Fungicide to Corn

On-Farm Evaluation of Polymer Coated Urea Rates and Blends on Potato Yield and Quality

Corn nitrogen rate management: Facts, concepts, and Mother Nature

Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Placement Consequences for Corn: A Look at Controlling Factors

November 2003 Issue # TILLAGE MANAGEMENT FOR MANURED CROPLAND

CROP AVAILABILITY OF PHOSPHORUS FROM SUGARBEET FACTORY LIME

CROP ADVANCES Field Crop Reports

Top Strip-Till Practices for Corn and Soybean

N and P Placement and Timing of Dryland Winter Wheat Varieties K. J. Larson and L. Herron 1

USE OF STRIP-TILLAGE FOR CORN PRODUCTION IN KANSAS

Improving Cotton Production Efficiency With Phosphorus and Potassium Placement At Multiple Depths in Strip Tillage Systems

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley

NITROGEN TIMING AND SOURCES. Larry G. Bundy Dept. of Soil Science Univ. of Wisconsin

Best Management Practices for Nitrogen Use in SOUTH-CENTRAL MINNESOTA

Fertilizer Placement Options Demonstration

Seed-placed versus side-banded phosphorus fertilizer effects on faba bean establishment and yield. Project # ADOPT 2016

Increasing Importance of Sulfur for Field Crops

Transcription:

Variable Rate Starter Fertilization Based on Soil Attributes Jeffrey Vetsch and Dr. Daniel Kaiser Univ. of Minnesota Fluid Fertilizer Forum, Scottsdale, AZ February, 15 and 16, 2016

Justification A fluid starter fertilizer, like ammonium poly phosphate (APP), applied in-furrow may be an efficient and economic alternative to a traditional broadcast application. Especially: on short-term rented land, where the farmer is not necessarily interested in building soil test levels, when commodity prices are lower and input cost reductions are desired and on high ph soils that have the potential to fix P.

Soil parent materials of Minnesota Glacial till / bedrock Loess Outwash Glacial till Lacustrine

Very High High Medium Low Very Low Should we vary starter rates based on soil test P or ph?

Additional questions What is the benefit of starter fertilizer with and without broadcast P fertilizer? How do starter and broadcast P applications affect yield response across the landscape?

The objectives of this study were to: 1) measure the effect of APP rate on early growth of corn and grain yield; 2) determine if the optimum rate of APP varies within a typical Minnesota field; 3) develop and calibrate an algorithm for making variable rate starter applications based on soil attributes; and 4) compare and contrast the effects of a traditional broadcast P application on the response(s) observed in objectives 1, 2 and 3.

Experimental design Modified strip trial design Treatments randomized within replications in a split-plot arrangement Main plot: Broadcast P rate (2) Sub plot: APP starter rates (4) 16 replications per location 16 reps 8 treatments = 128 plots Response data from replications with similar soil attributes are pooled together 2 3 7 5 2.5 5 5 0 405 406 407 408 4 1 6 8 7.5 0 2.5 7.5 401 402 403 404 5 6 4 3 0 2.5 7.5 5 205 206 207 208 8 7 2 1 7.5 5 2.5 0 201 202 203 204 10' 10' 65' 65' 65' 65'

Methods and measurements Ten field studies were conducted from 2012-2015 on fields with varying soil test P and ph. Broadcast P applied at 0 and 120 lb P 2 O 5 /ac (TSP). APP applied in-furrow at 0, 2.5, 5 and 7.5 gal/ac or about 0, 10, 20 and 30 lb P 2 O 5 /ac. At V5-6 harvest 8 whole plants measure: yield, P concentration and P uptake. Grain harvest measure: yield, moisture, P concentration and P removal in corn grain.

Methods (continued) Soil samples analyzed for Bray P1, Olsen P, ph, CaCO 3 and exchangeable K 0-6 inch samples: one composite (8 cores) sample from two neighboring plots or an area about 15 ft. by 35 ft. 6-12 inch samples: one composite (16 cores) for each replication or an area 40 ft. by 130 ft (0.12 ac).

Precipitation and temperature at New Richland Daily precipitation, inch 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Precipitation Daily average temperature Normal temperature 90 80 70 60 50 40 Temperature., deg F. 0.0 30 5/1/15 6/1/15 7/1/15 8/1/15 9/1/15 10/1/15

Weather summary: 2012 2015 2012: early spring (planting), very warm early, summer drought reduced yields 2013: cool and wet spring, snow delayed planting, late summer drought reduced yields 2014: awful growing season, record wet June, cool, summer drought, early frost 2015: early spring (planting) but cool, ample well distributed rainfall, EXCELLENT growing season

Summary of soil test attributes (2015) Soil ph Olsen P Location Depth SOM Avg. Range Avg. Range inch % --- ppm --- New Rich. 0-6 5.6 7.6 7.0-7.9 9 3-17 6-12 4.7 7.0 6.7-8.0 3 3-9 Clarkfield 0-6 4.2 7.8 6.8-8.0 9 4-20 6-12 4.0 7.9 7.6-8.1 3 2-5

Figure 1. Increase in early plant growth over the control (no starter or broadcast P) averaged across eight southern Minnesota field locations. Increase in V5-V7 Plant Mass (%) 30 25 20 15 10 5 No Starter 2.5 GPA 10-34-0 5.0 GPA 10-34-0 7.5 GPA 10-34-0 0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 No Broadcast P 120 lbs P 2 O 5 Broadcast

Summary: V5-6 whole plants When averaged across sites: Starter as APP applied in-furrow increased V5 corn plant mass. Broadcast P increased plant mass but not as much as starter Plant mass increased slightly with increasing APP rate.

Significance of treatment main effects for grain yield and moisture by location (2015). Parameter Location Broadcast P Starter P Bdct*Starter --------------------P > F-------------------- Grain Yield New Richland 0.644 0.253 0.954 Clarkfield <0.001 0.498 0.156 Grain Moisture New Richland 0.614 0.927 0.691 Clarkfield 0.320 0.698 0.410

Corn grain yield, bu/ac Corn yield as affected by broadcast P 250 225 200 175 150 NS 7 bu 9 bu 25 bu NS None 120-lb P 2 O 5 8 bu NS 24 bu NS 13 bu 125 G-12 S-12 NR-13 W-13 J-13 NR-14SC-14 W-14 NR-15 C-15

Main effects summary for grain yield Broadcast P increased grain yields at 1 of 2 sites in 2015 and 6 of 10 sites overall. Yield response ranged from 7 25 bu/ac. Starter fertilizer increased grain yields in 3 of 10 sites overall, none in 2015.

Relative yield as affected by treatment main effects across locations. Treatment Effects Relative yield Olsen P Level or Class % Very Low (0-3 ppm Olsen) 83.2 c Low (4-7 ppm Olsen) 96.6 b Medium (8-11 ppm) 99.0 a High (12-15 ppm) 100.9 a Very High (16+ ppm) 100.1 a Broadcast Rate 0 lb P 2 O 5 /ac 92.7 b 120 lb 99.3 a Starter (APP, 10-34-0) Rate 0 gal/ac 93.5 b 2.5 gal 94.8 b 5.0 gal 98.0 a 7.5 gal 97.6 a

Relative yield as affected by treatment main effects across locations. Treatment Effects Relative yield Interactions, (P > F) Olsen Level Broadcast Rate <0.001 Olsen Level Starter Rate 0.103 Broadcast Rate Starter Rate 0.001 Olsen Level Broadcast Starter 0.124

Relative yield as affected by the interaction between Olsen P level and broadcast P. Relative Corn Grain Yield (%) 110 No Broadcast P 120 lb P2O5 100 90 80 70 ** ** ** * ns V. Low Low Medium High V. High Soil Test P Class

Relative yield as affected by the interaction between broadcast and starter P rates. Relative Corn Grain Yield (%) 105 100 95 90 85 No Starter 2.5 GPA 10-34-0 5.0 GPA 10-34-0 7.5 GPA 10-34-0 *** ns 80 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 No Broadcast P 120 lbs P 2 O 5 Broadcast

Summary for relative yield across sites. All main effects (Olsen P level, broadcast P and starter P) affected relative yields. A significant Olsen P level broadcast P rate interaction showed: broadcast P increased yields at Very Low, Low, Medium and High Olsen P levels but not at Very High level (>16 ppm). A significant broadcast starter P interaction showed starter P increased yields only when broadcast P was not applied.

Relative yield as affected by broadcast and starter P rates across soil test P classes. Relative Corn Yield (% of Max.) 110 100 90 No Starter no P 2.5 GPA APP 5 GPA APP 7.5 GPA APP Broadcast P 2.5 GPA APP + Broadcast 5 GPA APP + Broadcast 7.5 GPA APP + Broadcast 80 No Broadcast + Broadcast No Broadcast + Broadcast No Broadcast + Broadcast Low STP Medium STP High STP

Conclusions Should we vary starter rates based on soil attributes like soil test P or ph? No. What is the benefit of starter fertilizer in addition to broadcast P fertilizer? Small yield increase when STP low Early growth and grain moisture. How do starter and broadcast P applications affect yield response across the landscape? Response to broadcast P driven by STP, not so for starter. These data were not clear on the optimum rate of APP likely about 5 gal/ac

Acknowledgements The authors are most grateful to: the, Minnesota Corn Growers, Corn Research and Promotion Council for funding this project FFF partnering labs for in-kind support research crews at the Department of Soil, Water, and Climate and Southern Research and Outreach Center for their assistance farmer cooperators for their assistance and the use of land

QUESTIONS Jeffrey Vetsch Univ. of Minnesota Southern Research and Outreach Center jvetsch@umn.edu http://sroc.cfans.umn.edu/people/staff/jeffreyvetsch/index.htm