MONALISA 2.0 Activity 4 Efficient Management of Safety Information Systems in Ports

Similar documents
MONALISA 2 0_D Sea Traffic Management A Holistic View

MONALISA 2 0_D Sea Voyage Costs

Report on ICT tool to support bridge operations with early warning of grounding

STM Validation Project. Project Description

Requirement Specification of the SES (Safe Evacuation System)

MONALISA 2.0 Activity 3 Pilot Application

Activity 2 - MONALISA 2.0. Defining Sea Traffic Management

EMSA s Integrated Maritime Services: Improving Operational Maritime Awareness at EU level

e-navigation workshop

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR VESSELS BOUND FOR OR LEAVING PORTS OF THE BALTIC SEA STATES AND CARRYING DANGEROUS OR POLLUTING GOODS

MONALISA in ICE (MICE) A Practical Approach to Sea Traffic Management in Ice Operations

STM Architecture Framework

User survey on maritime communication security

REPORTING HAZMAT IN SAFESEANET OBTAINING ACCURATE INFORMATION ON DANGEROUS AND POLLUTING GOODS ON BOARD SHIPS

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Report on platform recovery tests for OLRS systems

Sea Traffic Management - A Concept Creating the Need for New Maritime Information Standards and Software Solutions

S-100 PROPOSAL FOR ONLINE DATA EXCHANGE. Why do we need it? How do we achieve it?

SECTION 1: CURRICULUM SUMMARY. 1. Occupational Information. 1.1 Associated Occupation. 1.2 Occupation or Specialisation Addressed by this Curriculum

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. Blue Belt, a Single Transport Area for shipping

SOHAR Port Marine Manual

TRANSAS STM SOLUTIONS

Sea Traffic Management Concepts and Components

e-navigation Frequently Asked Questions

Ulf Siwe Sea Traffic Management & the MONALISA 2.0 Project Innovating the Maritime Transport

Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Harmful Substances

MARITIME TRANSPORT AND EC LAW AND POLICY

The Republic of Kazakhstan

Marine Asset Protection using AIS Data

RESOLUTION A.851(20) adopted on 27 November 1997

INTEGRATED MARITIME SERVICES OPERATIONAL AWARENESS ACROSS SECTORS AND SEAS

STAR Center Task Coverage by Course NVIC Ch. 1 Updated 25 February 2017

National Single Window Prototype

EU Legislation relevant to recreational boating

Bulgarian Vessel Traffic Management and Information System and Education and Training of VTS Personnel in Bulgaria

Use of ITS technologies for multimodal transport operations River Information Services (RIS) transport logistics services

2010-EU S MIELE Multimodal Interoperability E-services for Logistics and Environment sustainability

OPERATIONS SEAFARER CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE NOTE SA MARITIME QUALIFICATIONS CODE VTS

Canaport Energy East Marine Terminal Presentation Carlos Pardo September 26 & 28, 2016

MANDATORY SHIP REPORTING SYSTEM

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying document to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. REFIT Adjusting Course: EU Passenger Ship Safety Legislation Fitness Check

Appendix B to Tender Specifications

EU MRV Webinar. Verify. Comply. Navigate November 2016

e-navigation Development in Russia, industry View

The Current Situation

Innovative Geospatial Solutions towards a Sustainable Maritime Trade

Automating Continuous Integration over Complex IT Infrastructure

To all Registered owners, Managers and Representatives of ships flying the Cyprus Flag

Activity 2 Defining Sea Traffic Management STM Master Plan MONALISA 2.0 D2.4.2, D2.5.1, D2.5.2, D2.6.1 MONALISA 2.0 STM MASTER PLAN 1

ANNEX 1 RESOLUTION FAL.8(32) Adopted on 7 July 2005

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

WORK PROGRAMME. Submitted by Israel and Poland SUMMARY

List of participants: Participant Participant organisation name. Country

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT

STM Performance Target

RESOLUTION MSC.433(98) (adopted on 16 June 2017) GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA FOR SHIP REPORTING SYSTEMS

082596/EU XXIV. GP. Eingelangt am 25/05/12 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 25 May /12 TRANS 177 MAR 75

Challenges for maritime transport

Technical Publication. IMO requirements on carriage of publications on board ships /

Telematics in the transport of dangerous goods

MARIN Seminar "VTS, een uitdagende toekomst"

WP 4: Supervision, monitoring and control

12193/13 AV/cf 1 DG E 2 A

WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SHIP-GENERATED WASTE ISSUE 2

The VHF Data Exchange System (VDES) Connecting the maritime world.

MTS Resilience: enavigation Best Practices

MONITORING AND CONTROLLING SYSTEMS of the ships for safety and environmental protection

PORT OF HAMINAKOTKA LTD. General guidelines

Guidelines on reporting Hazmat in SafeSeaNet. Version 3

Pre-arrival Procedure Form Preparation Guidelines

URUGUAY SOLAR AND WIND RESOURCE ASSESSMENT

Training and cooperation

Enabling Effective Port Resource Management: Integrating Systems of Production Data Streams

REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS

SESAME Straits Update on the Straits Traffic Management system

Safety of LNG-Shipping around Ports and Terminals

FAL Convention CONVENTION ON FACILITATION OF INTERNATIONAL MARITIME TRAFFIC, 1965, AS AMENDED Edition. Erratum June 2018

Prof. Pietro del Rosso

BUSINESS PLAN CEN/TC 15 INLAND NAVIGATION VESSELS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Resolution A.1072(28) Adopted on 4 December 2013 (Agenda item 10)

New Draft MO42 (Carriage, stowage and securing of cargoes and containers) open for consultation until 30 April 2016

DRAFT. Accuracy standards for weighing equipment approved by AMSA

JOB DESCRIPTON. Health & Safety / Security Officer. Purpose of the position:

ABI6010 International Technical Certificate in Jetty and Terminal Operational Safety UNIT 1 TERMINAL MANAGEMENT, SAFETY AND SECURITY

Marine incidents involving HNS and EMSA s services for chemical spills HNS-MS Final Stakeholder Meeting

Maritime Safety Stakeholders in Information Exchange Process

The Single Window. Solution: X Road. for Logistics. Valdo Kalm Chairman of the Management Board Port of Tallinn

ANNEX 2: PRIORITY "PRE-IDENTIFIED PROJECTS ON OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CORE NETWORK (RAILWAYS, INLAND WATERWAYS, ROADS, MARITIME AND INLAND PORTS) "

Clustering the Motorways of the Sea, Århus, 12 April 2011

OPERATIONS SEAFARER CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE NOTE SA MARITIME QUALIFICATIONS CODE. Deck: Cargo Handling and Stowage

TEN-T PROJECT NO: 2010-EU S ACTIVITY 1: CALL TO PORT PROCESS PRELIMINARY STUDY

SEA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT VALIDATION PROJECT

Document No: Title: Service instance description for the SSPA Route Optimization service. Date:

23.7 billion billion CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES ENHANCING SECURITY AND CONNECTIVITY WITH DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

Woodfibre LNG Limited Response to SIGTTO LNG Ports and Risk Reduction Options

MARITIME TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES 2030

Syllabus for Dangerous Goods Safety Adviser. Examinations

Activity 3 - MONALISA 2.0. Increased Maritime safety - Safer Ships

ISPS CODE: NAVIGATION AND PORT SAFETY

Transcription:

MONALISA 2.0 Activity 4 Efficient Management of Safety Information Systems in Ports Document No: MONALISA 2 0_D4.5.1 MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 1

Table of contents Page 1 Need for an integrated information system for safety management in a port 4 2 Location of the integrated information system for safety management in a port... 5 2.a The Port s Vessel Traffic Service... 5 2.b The Port s Emergency Control Centre... 6 3 Minimum information required for port safety management... 7 3.a Information about the vessels... 7 3.a.1 Data concerning the vessel s call at the port... 7 3.a.2 Information about the status of the vessels in the port... 8 3.b Information about terminals or port facilities... 8 3.b.1 Permanent contact details... 8 3.b.2 Emergency Plans... 8 3.b.3 Security Plans... 8 3.b.4 Dangerous goods in the terminal or port facility... 8 3.c Information about the port... 9 3.c.1 Documents and procedures for emergencies... 9 3.c.2 Dangerous or polluting goods... 9 3.c.3 Other port operations that may lead to potential emergencies... 9 3.c.4 Automatic alarms received... 10 3.c.5 Weather conditions in the port... 10 3.c.6 Electronic communications ith other external emergency control centres and services... 10 4 Integration of the minimum information required for port safety management 11 4.a Example of information integration... 11 4.b Heterogeneity of the softare used in European ports for safety & security and emergency management... 13 MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 2

5 Port Collaborative Decision Making (Port CDM)... 15 5.a Monalisa 2.0 Project s Activity 2... 15 5.b Port Collaborative Decision Making (Port CDM)... 15 5.c Integration of port authority information systems in Port CDM... 17 6 Conclusions... 18 MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 3

1. Need for an integrated information system for safety management in a port A commercial port is the set of physical components, usually including structures (breakaters, locks, quays, facilities, etc.) that make it possible to use an area on a coast or riverbank as a place here vessels can load and unload goods and passengers can embark and disembark under favourable conditions. Goods change their transport mode at the port, from land to sea or river. The area of a port consists mainly of land areas, hich may be adjoining or not, and a larger or smaller area of ater hich is used by vessels to enter and leave the port and also, depending on the layout of the port, to anchor. An accident or emergency in a port may involve a land facility or a vessel, and sometimes both of them, depending on the scale of the accident. It may also entail a hazard for other facilities and/or vessels. Response teams need to have as much information as possible to tackle the emergency ith maximum safety and efficiency. A ide range of information may be needed: about the vessel, the facility, the location and hazards of the goods, the procedures in place to be folloed hen tackling the emergency, prevailing eather conditions, operations underay at that time in the port, etc. Very often the Emergency Director does not immediately have this information to hand because it is in different formats (paper or electronic), in different places, hich means they have to contact the people ho handle it, or is simply unavailable. To get round these problems the information needed to tackle or prevent emergencies has to be readily available to the port centre or department tasked ith handling and coordinating emergencies that take place in the port. Hence, the softare needed to achieve this goal has to be included in the port s information systems. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 4

2. Location of the integrated information system for safety management in a port As noted in the previous section, the port safety information required to handle emergencies in the port has to be located in the centre or department tasked ith handling and coordinating emergencies. This centre or department is usually one of the folloing to: a) The Port s Vessel Traffic Service In many European ports this role is performed by the Port s Vessel Traffic Service (VTS). This service monitors the maritime traffic of vessels and ships in the port area ith the help of radar, CCTV, radiotelephony, an Automatic Identification System (AIS) for vessels, eather stations, etc., in order to track and control their movements and ensure their utmost safety hen sailing. A port s Vessel Traffic Service may be provided by the port authority itself or by the national maritime authority. If the port s VTS is provided by the port authority, it can also handle and coordinate emergencies taking place on board vessels and at the port s land facilities. VTS Operations Room Port of Dover VTS Control Toer Port of Gdansk MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 5

b) The Port s Emergency Control Centre In other European ports, emergencies on vessels and/or on land facilities are specifically handled by the port s Emergency Control/Coordination Centre (ECC) hich usually reports to the port authority. If the ECC does not provide the port s Vessel Traffic Service, it ill nevertheless be in constant contact ith this service, especially in emergencies. Emergency Control Centre (ECC) Port of Valencia The ECC and the VTS may also handle security incidents or emergencies concerning vessels and port facilities. By ay of example, Spanish legislation requires all national ports handling dangerous goods to have an Emergency Control Centre hich coordinates the response to emergencies. The ECC s organisation, equipment and operational system have to be jointly agreed by the Port Authority and the National Maritime Administration. Spanish legislation also requires every state-oned port to have an Emergency Plan and a Security Plan for the vessels, passengers and goods in port areas. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 6

3. Minimum information required for port safety management Based on the above, the ECC (or port VTS as applicable) needs to have the folloing information available at all times so it can use or provide it if there is an emergency at the port. 3.a) Information about the vessels 1. Data concerning the vessel s call at the port This means all the information required by: Directive 2010/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 th October 2010 on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States; and by Directive 2002/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 th June 2002 establishing a Community vessel traffic monitoring and information system and repealing Council Directive 93/75/EEC. All the information is received in each port by electronic data transmission through a single indo that is in turn connected to the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) SafeSeaNet system, national customs electronic systems and other national electronic systems such as border control, etc. The most important information needed for emergency management can be summarised as follos: Information about the vessel: Vessel identification (name, call sign, IMO identification number, MMSI number, flag, port of registry, etc.). Technical specifications of the vessel (vessel type, length, breadth, G.T., etc.) Vessel s shipping company or shipping agency. Vessel s shipping agent in the port. Family name and given name of the captain Family name and given name of the ship security officer and their contact details. Family name and given name of the company s maritime security officer and their contact details. Information about the cre and passengers: Cre: number of cre, given and family names, capacity on board, nationality, date of birth and identification number. Passengers: number of passengers, given and family names, nationality, date of birth and identification number. Information about the dangerous or polluting goods on board the vessel: MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 7

Type of dangerous or polluting goods (solid bulk, liquid bulk or in packages and their transport units). Position of the goods on board. Class and UN number of the goods. Net eight of the goods. Where applicable, registration of the transport unit and its contents. Material Safety Data Sheet for the different dangerous or polluting goods. 2. Information about the status of the vessels in the port Position of each vessel: berthed, at anchor, etc. The vessel s operations at all times: loading, discharging, bunkering, aste collection, repairs, hot ork, engine shutdon, idle, etc. 3.b) Information about terminals or port facilities 1. Permanent contact details Given and family name of the person responsible for the safety of the facility and their contact details. Given and family name of the person responsible for the security of the facility and their contact details. 2. Emergency Plans Availability of the Emergency Plan of the terminal or port facility. 3. Security Plans Availability of the Security Plan of the terminal or port facility. 4. Dangerous goods in the terminal or port facility Bulk liquid dangerous goods stored in tanks: Class, UN number and proper shipping name of the goods stored in each tank. Volume and eight of the goods in each tank. Map of the tank or group of tanks in each terminal. Bulk solid dangerous goods in arehouses: Class, UN number and proper shipping name of the goods in each arehouse. Volume and eight of the goods in each arehouse. Map of the arehouse or arehouses in each terminal. Packaged dangerous goods or in transport units: Identification data of each package or registration of each transport unit (container, vehicle, etc.). MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 8

Class, UN number and proper shipping name of the goods in each package or transport unit. Position of each package or transport unit in the terminal (arehouse, yard, etc.). Map of the locations of the arehouse and/or yard in each terminal. 3.c) Information about the port 1. Documents and procedures for emergencies The port s Emergency Plan and its operating procedures. The port s Security Plan and its operating procedures. IMO codes for dangerous goods (IMDG Code, IGC Code, IBC Code, IMSBC Code, etc.). Europe agreements for dangerous goods carriage (ADR, RID, ADN). 2. Dangerous or polluting goods Authorisations issued on entry into the port of the dangerous or polluting goods. Material Safety Data Sheet for the dangerous goods authorised in the port. Emergency Schedules (EmS) of the IMDG Code for fire or spill of dangerous goods. European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) Emergency Response Intervention Cards (ERICards). Other information concerning interventions ith dangerous goods: CANUTEC Emergency Response Guidebook, etc. Softare for consequence analysis and planning zones in case of accident ith dangerous goods: leaks, spills, fires and explosions. Softare on motion prediction models for oil slicks in the ater. 3. Other port operations that may lead to potential emergencies Supplies of fuel and gas to tanks in port facilities for their on use or production processes. Underater ork. Trains. Operation of locks. Operation of moveable bridges. Other. 4. Automatic alarms received About the operation of maritime signals. About the operation of firefighting ater netorks. About the operation of drinking ater netorks. About the operation of the port s locks. About the operation of the port s moveable bridges. About the operation of the port s rail netork. About the operation of tunnels and underpasses in the port. About the operation of poer grids and transformer stations. About the operation of the port s internal telecommunications netorks. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 9

About sensors installed to measure potential sea or air pollution. About data detected by eather stations: ind speed, etc. From anti-intrusion detectors or systems. Other. 5. Weather conditions in the port Data received from eather stations and oceanographic buoys in the port or very close to it. o Wind speed, ind direction, temperature, degree of humidity, atmospheric pressure, rainater collected, etc. o Current speed, ave height, ater temperature, etc. Official eather forecasts received. 6. Electronic communications ith other external emergency control centres and services Data received via technological platforms for emergency management and communications ith civil defence emergency control centres and services. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 10

4. Integration of the minimum information required for port safety management Integration of all the minimum information required for port safety management is designed and conducted in its on ay by each port or national ports system and there is no uniform model for ports in the European Union. 4.a) Example of information integration For example, the Port Authority of Valencia has created proprietary softare for the tin purposes of integrating the necessary information about the port and also managing any emergencies that take place in it. This is done mainly through to computer programs called ESTRABON and SOCAIRE. ESTRABON GIS format computer softare that presents real-time information that the Emergency Control Centre may require concerning the port status: vessels in port, dangerous goods on board and in terminals, and other active events that may change safety conditions. It dras on the PAV s databases to provide full information about means of contact, vessel characteristics, dangerous goods, emergency response intervention cards, first aid, etc. Other ESTRABON features: Safety distances from the accident point. Measurement of distances and surfaces. Security log - black box. Emergency simulator: evolution of toxic clouds. Other. SOCAIRE MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 11

SOCAIRE s aim is to attack accidents or incidents before they happen. It manages safety from a holistic perspective by hybridising the concepts of industrial, environmental and occupational safety and port security. Events are input in SOCAIRE. An event is something that is happening in the port that could cause a future emergency. For example, events are: bunkering of ships, hot ork on board ships, immobilisation of vessel s engines, underater orks, orks in utility tunnels, roadblocks, anticipation of adverse eather events, vessels or facilities at a higher security level, loered crane booms ithout a vessel alongside, stoaays on board ships, maintenance orks on firefighting systems, etc. Described events: Control and monitoring of dangerous goods. Control of fire alarm systems. Collaboration ith national SAR services. Oil & HNS spillage response. Knoledge of operational facilities status. Working ith medical emergency services. Collaboration ith national security forces. Collaboration ith security officers (ships and facilities). Rescue of people in the ater. Stoaays. Piloting, toage and mooring services. Ship and facility bunkering. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 12

Special situations on ships. MARPOL collection. Aids to navigation. Ship operations: hot orks, repairs, immobilization of propulsion and steering systems, others. Weather conditions. Control of port roads. Control of recreational and sport events in port aters. 4.b) Heterogeneity of the softare used in European ports for safety & security and emergency management As noted above, European ports have various kinds of softare developed in-house or acquired from a softare company to integrate information on safety and security and handle emergencies that take place in the port. These programmes communication modules connect to the emergency services of the port itself or ith those of the city, region or country. It is thought that none of them is as yet ready or designed for communications ith other technology platforms such as Port CDM (Port Collaborative Decision Making) to be developed as part of the Sea Traffic Management in MONALISA Project 2.0. Hence the connection of port authorities information systems to Port CDM technology platform ould have the folloing teething troubles. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 13

Different softare used by European ports to manage safety & security. Ports information systems unprepared to transmit and receive safety & security information to or from Port CDM. What kind of information should be transmitted to Port CDM? MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 14

5. Port Collaborative Decision Making (Port CDM) 5.a) Monalisa 2.0 Project s Activity 2 The aim of Monalisa 2.0 Project s Activity 2 (Sea Traffic Management: Definition Phase Study) is to define and propose a comprehensive Sea Traffic Management (STM) concept that increases operational efficiency and safety as ell as generating environmental benefits in the maritime industry. Safety, environment and efficiency are defined as the Key Performance Objectives in STM and are supported by five strategic enabling concepts defining STM: Strategic Voyage Management concerns hat can be done before the journey has started in order to optimise it. An example of a solution that ould optimise management is the implementation of a Voyage ID, similar to the flight number in air traffic. Dynamic Voyage Management concerns optimising maritime information exchanges in order to improve the voyage of the individual ship. Vessels can travel at an optimised speed and select the best route to the destination. Port Collaborative Decision Making is inspired by air traffic but taking into account the uniqueness of the maritime industry. Closer collaboration beteen the operators in the port and the ships provides conditions for improved traffic coordination. The ports ill kno hen the vessels arrive and as the port is ready for them, the ships ill receive a precise ETA. Tests ill be conducted in Gothenburg and in Valencia. Flo Management concerns optimising the flo of traffic, particularly in restricted aters, channels and near ports. Monitoring the traffic and having information about the vessels routes ill allo arnings to be sent that may prevent grounding and collisions. System Wide Information Management applied in the maritime domain is a concept for information exchange and ill serve as a trusted infrastructure for organisations that participate in information exchanges. 5.b) Port Collaborative Decision Making (Port CDM) The Port Collaborative Decision Making concept (Port CDM) enables port operations and vessel turnaround processes to be performed just-in-time. By interfacing existing port information systems, Port CDM supports involved actors in the port call to share information about their intention constituting situational aareness for increased predictability. Such situational aareness enables long-term planning, resource optimisation and handling of late changes. By port call synchronisation, arriving vessels can avoid unnecessary anchoring and steam sloer, thus saving money and the environment. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 15

Port CDM constitutes the interface beteen sea operations and port operations ithin the STM concept Objectives of Port CDM - The efficient and collaborative port. At the time of riting this, deliverable tests for information transmission beteen the ports of Gothenburg and Valencia ere being carried out. It is not planned to include information about emergencies or incidents affecting the port that may be of interest to Port CDM users in this testing phase. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 16

5.c) Integration of port authority information systems in Port CDM Section 4 above identified the problems that might be entailed by integrating port authorities safety and security information to be sent to or received from Port CDM. Once the technological problems have been sorted out, e think that the folloing information about the safety and security of the port as a hole, and hich is to be provided by port authorities to the Port CDM system, ould be useful or necessary: Port safety information: Closing the port to navigation due to eather conditions or any other cause. Nautical accidents of vessels in port aters involving immobilisation of the ship hile it is being repaired afloat in port or having to take it to a shipyard. Adverse eather conditions in the port: ind speeds, ban on mooring, etc. Port terminal emergencies involving stoppage of operations. Marine pollution in port aters: o o Ships not alloed to depart until the ater and/or hull is cleaned up. Ship not alloed to depart as it is the cause of the pollution. Other information. Port security information: ISPS 2 or 3 levels in the port. ISPS 2 or 3 levels in a port terminal. Other information. Other information: Port orker strikes that affect the entire port. Strikes in technical nautical services (piloting, toage and mooring). Other strikes leading to stoppages in port terminals (land transport, etc.). Other information. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 17

6. Conclusions Operational and safety conditions in a port are a key factor in Sea Traffic Management (STM), since accurate information about incidents or accidents occurring in it or eather conditions affecting it should be knon immediately by ship operators so they can take decisions hich make their management more efficient. Although each port has its on safety management system, it is not feasible to integrate them into a joint technology platform. Moreover, it is likely that port authorities may be reluctant to provide certain information about port safety, arguing that such information might be a eak spot for overall port security. Port Collaborative Decision Making (Port CDM) should be driven and developed ith the greatest possible consensus of national port administrations so that it becomes a mandatory tool to be used by each European port authority. This document has sought to indicate hat information about the safety and security of the port provided by the port authorities should be integrated into the final technology platform hich is developed for the purposes identified by Port CDM, regardless of hether it is finally decided to add more information in this respect. MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 18

39 partners from 10 countries taking maritime transport into the digital age By designing and demonstrating innovative use of ICT solutions MONALISA 2.0 ill provide the route to improved SAFETY - ENVIRONMENT - EFFICIENCY Sedish Maritime Administration LFV - Air Navigation Services of Seden SSPA Viktoria Sedish ICT Transas Carmenta Chalmers University of Technology World Maritime University The Sedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Danish Maritime Authority Danish Meteorological Institute GateHouse Navicon Novia University of Applied Sciences DLR Fraunhofer Jeppesen Rheinmetall Carnival Corp. Italian Ministry of Transport RINA Services D Appolonia Port of Livorno IB SRL Martec SPA Ergoproject University of Genua VEMARS SASEMAR Ferri Industries Valencia Port Authority Valencia Port Foundation CIMNE Corporacion Maritima Technical University of Madrid University of Catalonia Technical University of Athens MARSEC-XL Noregian Coastal Administration.monalisaproject.eu MONALISA 2.0 - EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SAFETY INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN PORTS 19