RESEARCH REPORT SHRM / GLOBOFORCE. Employee Recognition Survey FALL 2012 REPORT THE BUSINESS IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION

Similar documents
SHRM Survey Findings: Employee Recognition Programs, Spring In collaboration with and commissioned by Globoforce

research report Fall 2012 Report Revealing Key Practices For Effective Recognition

THE 2018 SHRM/GLOBOFORCE EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION REPORT Designing work cultures for the human era

BRINGING MORE HUMANITY TO RECOGNITION, PERFORMANCE, AND LIFE AT WORK

Know the numbers. Take a lead. Understand your employees.

BRINGING SMILES TO HERSHEY CASE STUDY

Recognition Manifesto. How Strategic Recognition Drives Every Facet of Your Integrated Talent Strategy

Applying Predictive Analytics to Improve Talent Retention

Tying Recognition to Business Initiatives: Trends and Insights for Success. Tying Recognition to Business Initiatives Vanessa Brangwyn

Global Workforce Analytics: The Next Big Thing? Featuring: Linda E. Amuso Radford Dan Weber Radford

LHRMA. >> Current Trends and Best Practices in Employee Recognition. June 2012

MOODTracker. Globoforce Workforce Mood Tracker The September 2011 Report. The Impact of Recognition on Employee Retention WORKFORCE TM

HOW TO GET EXECUTIVE BUY-IN FOR RECOGNITION JANUARY 29, 2014

MEASURING THE POWER OF YOUR EMPLOYEES. Presenting the Limeade Results Model

BENEFITS & COMPENSATION INTERNATIONAL TOTAL REMUNERATION AND PENSION INVESTMENT

How to Select, Align, Develop, and Retain Highly-Engaged People in Healthcare

I Know What You Said, Now Tell Me More! The Value of Non-Anonymous Surveys. White Paper

MERCER LEARNING EMPOWERING TOMORROW S HR LEADERS TODAY

SHRM Survey Findings: Diversity and Inclusion

Empowering Employees. The state of employee engagement and retention in higher education

Automating the Onboarding Process to Realize Significant Return on Investment

The Value of Employee Engagement. A Guide to Discovering the Business Impact of High-Engagement Employees

Executive Summary. The State of Employee Engagement pg. 2

Table of Contents. Globoforce Can Help Download and Share About the Author. Transform Performance Management with Strategic Employee Recognition

SHRM Poll: Drug Testing Efficacy

Sage HRMS. Workforce Career Development Planning: A Winning Strategy for Your Business and Employees

REASONS YOU NEED STRATEGIC RECOGNITION

MEASURING ENGAGEMENT TO UNLOCK YOUR COMPANY S COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Revamp Your Recognition and Rewards Program

Employee Engagement. What s Your Engagement Ratio?

The Intersection of Brand and Culture: Leveraging Engaged Employees as Brand Ambassadors

Increase Employee Engagement Through Training

The Cost of Disengagement to Your Company

Culture Trends FOR 2016

The average employee stays in one job for only 4.4 years. -Bureau of Labor and Statistics

SHRM Survey Findings: The Aging Workforce Basic and Applied Skills. Funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

O.C. Tanner Institute RECOGNITION IN THE MODERN WORKPLACE

2014 Performance Management Survey

ITA GROUP EBOOK. Are Employee Wellbeing and Engagement Part of Your Bottom-Line Success Strategy?

The State of Performance Management

CORPORATE MOBILITY TODAY: How Companies Are Purchasing Moving and Relocation Services

Challenges for human resource management in global business strategy

WHY DO EMPLOYEES LEAVE?

Employee engagement: An illusive force of motivation and emotional commitment of employees to the organization and its goals.

The Employee Experience of Healthcare Workers

EMPLOYMENT LIFE CYCLE

HR Connect Asia Pacific

Journée Towers Watson à l intention des leaders RH

Influences. Employee engagement results from a host of workplace

The Accenture 2011 High Performance Finance Study. Redefining High Performance in the Insurance Finance Function

Turning Employees into Brand Advocates. 4 Steps to an Effective Employee Engagement Program

Automating the Onboarding Process to Realize Significant Return on Investment

The Case for Employee Recognition. Build Your Case for an Employee Recognition Strategy

Special Report: The Secret to Increasing Workforce Performance through Great Objectives Management

Change the way the world works. The Cost of Disengagement to Your Company

HR Metrics that Matter

TOTAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: MAPPING PERFORMANCE TO EQUITABLE TALENT SELECTION

Attraction and Retention Framework: Overview Summer 2006

Building a Culture of Employee Effectiveness & Engagement. It Requires More Than Just a Survey

Total Rewards Implementation and Integration. research. A report by WorldatWork and Mercer July 2010

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION KEY THEMES PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE KEY THEMES IN DETAIL... 4

WF ED 573 Rewards and Recognition Needs Assessment. Michelle Neel. Pennsylvania State University

Driving high performance

Office of the Director of National Intelligence. IC Annual Employee Climate Survey. April Summary Results

SHRM Research Overview: Talent Acquisition. SHRM Research Overview: Talent Acquisition

2010 Hay Group. All Rights Reserved. Store Managers Mobilization Study: How to engage the Store Managers to Feel and Act as Owners AB Vassilopoulos

STRATEGIC COMPENSATION SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Making pay for performance work

2016 Tech Industry Report. Increased Turnover Risk & Other Trends in Workplace Engagement

The Employee Experience Index

Onboarding Best Practices to Maximize Employee Engagement

Employee Value Proposition. Make the Most of your HR Investment

INDUSTRY SNAPSHOTS. Business and Professional Services

Jeffrey Brenner. Senior Director of Corporate Solution Sales Rymax Marketing Services

The Transformation Imperative for Small and Midsize Companies

creating a culture of employee engagement

Digital Employee Engagement Whitepaper 2018

HR Practices in Ireland Survey 2018

Today s Alliance Professional... Tomorrow s Strategic Leader

TIPS TO CREATE. Happier Employees

Improving Employee Engagement Through Social Learning

EFFECTIVE WAYS OF USING HR ANALYTICS to DESIGN and TRACK REWARD PROGRAMMES. DR JACLYN LEE- PhD SENIOR DIRECTOR-HR & OD

Building A Business Case for Your Financial Wellness Program

2012 Employee Climate Survey. Monica R. Allen, PhD Performance & Evaluation Manager September 18, 2012

Workforce Optimization

2010 High Performance Workforce Findings:

Professional Development in Higher Education Survey

5 Signs of a Disengaged Employee

INSIDE EMPLOYEES MINDSTM

The Missing Piece of the Customer Experience Puzzle: Customer-Centric Employees

Candidate Experience From End-to-End: What s Your Weakest Link?

Whitepaper. Improving Employee. A New Strategic Wave

Employee engagement is promoted by a myriad of

forces A forces How Top Sales Teams Drive Performance Executive Summary

The Strategic Approach to HR

Your Culture Checklist

Table of Contents. Page 2 of 10

Collaborative Solutions

Perspectives. The Human Capital Framework. Making the Connections That Drive Business Results

Polypropylene Resin Supplier Customer Value & Loyalty Benchmarking Study

Transcription:

SHRM / GLOBOFORCE Employee Recognition Survey FALL 2012 REPORT THE BUSINESS IMPACT OF EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION RESEARCH REPORT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 2 Succession planning, employee engagement and culture management are top of mind for HR leaders. One key question is how to design an effective recognition program that can be leveraged to help manage these key HR issues. After all, they are not only metrics of our human capital success, but also key drivers of our businesses. Twice a year, Globoforce commissions a survey with the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM ), the world s largest association devoted to human resource management. Our goal is to elicit trends among HR leaders and practitioners about what challenges they are facing and what strategies help them conquer those challenges. This August, we surveyed 815 HR professionals, and asked them to share their experiences, practices and perceptions. The Fall 2012 survey uncovers new insights on emerging employee recognition trends and best practices. We looked in particular at these questions: * What are the top issues facing HR management today? * Is it important that core values be aligned with recognition? * How are emerging practices like peer-to-peer recognition affecting engagement? * What is the impact of recognition on employee enablement? * What are the best practices for spending on a recognition program? KEY FINDINGS From 815 respondents, we uncovered the following five findings: 1. The top three challenges faced by HR organizations today are succession planning, employee engagement and culture management. 2. Companies with strategic recognition programs report less frustrated and more enabled employees. 3. Strategic recognition programs tied to corporate values are more effective than programs without ties to corporate values. 4. Empowering employees to both give and receive formal recognition yields better results. 5. Organizations that spend more than 1% of payroll on employee recognition experience better results.

1 / The top three challenges faced by HR organizations today are succession planning, employee engagement and culture management. Although survey respondents indicated that issues around retention, performance management, recruitment, enablement and employee satisfaction were all concerns, the top three challenges faced by HR today were succession planning, employee engagement and culture management. (Figure 1) SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 3 FIGURE 1 WHAT ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT HR CHALLENGES TO YOUR ORGANIZATION? Succession planning Employee engagement Culture management Performance management Recruitment Employee retention Employee satisfaction 30% 28% 28% 25% 24% 41% 40% Employee enablement Relieving employee frustrations 21% 21% Productivity Revenue per FTE Other 5% 12% 11% SUCCESSION PLANNING More than two-fifths (41%) of those surveyed cited succession planning as a key HR challenge. This is likely due to growing pressure from the growing talent shortage, which has sharpened concerns about turnover and put increased emphasis on retaining, promoting and training talent from within. HR leaders are looking for ways to identify and key influencers within their organizations, so that they can be groomed as leaders of tomorrow. EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Nearly tied for the spot at the top of the list is employee engagement. Most HR leaders see the critical connection between high engagement and better business results. Gallup, Hay Group, Towers Watson and others have all done research that shows engaged companies are more profitable, more customer-focused and safer. CULTURE MANAGEMENT Culture management is another key concern and cited as a top challenge faced by today s HR organizations. In part this is likely because culture is so critical, yet traditionally so difficult to measure and quantify. Companies are searching for reliable metrics for gauging culture and cultural change that can reinforce company values and drive business goals.

2 / Companies with strategic recognition programs report less frustrated and more enabled employees. Even the highest engagement scores will not yield true business results if employees are not also put in a position to succeed. This is known as employee enablement, and it means having people in the right roles and providing them with both the resources and support to get things done. Unless engaged employees are also enabled, they run the risk of becoming frustrated or disengaged. SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 4 The SHRM/Globoforce survey found that when companies have strategic recognition programs programs where all recognition awards are tied to corporate values their employees feel more enabled and empowered to succeed and less tempted to jump ship. Employees with strategic recognition programs also possess a stronger understanding of organizational objectives and feel more capable of achieving them. This is likely due to strategic recognition s ability to reinforce values, encourage strong working relationships and clarify must-win battles. Our survey found: * Organizations with strategic recognition programs in place exhibit 28.6% lower frustration levels than companies without recognition programs. (Figure 2) * Organizations with strategic recognition programs are 25.4% more likely to have a clear understanding of organizational objectives than companies without a recognition program. (Figure 3) * Employees feel 21.5% more enabled to help achieve organizational objectives at companies with strategic recognition programs in place, compared to those without recognition. (Figure 4) * Companies with strategic recognition reported a mean employee turnover rate that is 23.4% lower than retention at companies without any recognition program. (Figure 5) What is Strategic Recognition? Moving beyond simple appreciation or scattershot recognition practices, a strategic recognition program links each recognition moment directly back to your organization s core values and strategic objectives, giving those moments more meaning and reinforcing your core values in the minds of your employees. By tying recognition to your business objectives and then measuring and monitoring that activity, you are able to manage your culture and your talent and help shape behavior at all levels of the organization. Strategic recognition is: * Tied back to your core values and goals * Measured, recorded and analyzed * Universal, consistent and centralized for easy reporting

SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 5 FIGURE 2 LOWER FRUSTRATION LEVELS Q. How would you rate your employees current frustration level with getting things accomplished at your organization? (Scale 1-5) FIGURE 3 BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF OBJECTIVES Q. Do employees have a clear understanding of organizational objectives? 25% 35% Strategic Recognition No Recognition 79% 63% Strategic Recognition No Recognition 4 or 5 Yes FIGURE 4 MORE ENABLED EMPLOYEES Q. Are employees enabled to help achieve organizational objectives? FIGURE 5 LOWER TURNOVER RATES Q. Approximately, what was your organization s voluntary employee turnover rate in 2011? 79% 65% Strategic Recognition No Recognition 14% 18% Strategic Recognition No Recognition Yes Mean

3 / Strategic recognition programs tied to corporate values are more effective than programs without ties to corporate values. SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 6 When we analyzed key metrics, we found that when recognition programs are directly tied to organizational core values, they are more effective. The fact that these programs consistently reinforce company goals and give real-world modeling of desired behaviors may explain their higher impact on things like engagement and satisfaction. These kinds of recognition programs also yield actionable data that provides deeper insight into company culture and talent performance, which enables organizations to better manage and measure those areas. * 72% of companies with strategic recognition programs reported that employees were rewarded according to their job performance, compared to only 55% of employees at companies with non-strategic recognition programs. (Figure 6) * There is also a strong tie between companies that have recognition programs tied to values and a sense of having accurate performance appraisals. 62% of survey respondents at companies with strategic recognition reported that performance reviews in their organization were an accurate appraisal of performance vs. only 50% for companies without strategic recognition. (Figure 7) * And critically, 37% of companies with strategic recognition report high percentages (71% or better) of workers with high engagement levels versus only 25% of companies without strategic recognition. (Figure 8)

FIGURE 6 EMPLOYEES FEEL MORE ACCURATELY REWARDED Q. Do employees at your organization feel rewarded according to job performance? SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 7 72% At companies with recognition program tied to corp values 55% At companies with recognition program not tied to corp values FIGURE 7 MORE ACCURATE PERFORMANCE APPRAISALS Q. Are annual performance reviews at your organization accurate appraisals for your employees work? 62% 50% At companies with recognition program tied to corp values At companies with recognition program not tied to corp values FIGURE 8 MORE ENGAGED EMPLOYEES Q. Based on engagement surveys conducted by your organization, what percentage of your employees feel highly engaged in the workplace? 37% 25% At companies with recognition program tied to corp values At companies with recognition program not tied to corp values Report engagement levels of 71% or higher

4 / Empowering employees to both give and receive formal recognition yields better results. SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 8 In metric after metric, SHRM/Globoforce survey results showed that companies that have implemented peer-to-peer recognition perform better. These companies have recognition programs with greater impacts on their financial results. HR managers perceive that employees are better attuned with company values and in turn feel that rewards are given out according to job performance. These companies are also more likely to feel highly engaged at work. * When you look at companies that promote peer-to-peer recognition versus those that don t, they are 11.5% more likely to impact engagement in the workplace; 28% more likely to reinforce corporate values; 34.8% more likely to help with employee retention; and 35.7% more likely to have a positive impact on financial results. (Figure 9) * Companies that use peer-to-peer recognition have seen marked positive increases to key business metrics across the board. 57% have seen increased engagement, 41% have seen and increase in customer satisfaction and 32% have seen an increase in customer retention, 32% have seen increased productivity, 28% have seen boosts in employee retention according to HR managers perceptions. (Figure 10)

FIGURE 9 THE IMPACT OF PEER-TO-PEER RECOGNITION Q. Does your organization s recognition program produce the following? SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 9 Yes, we use peer-to-peer No, we don t use peer-to-peer 87% 78% 82% 64% 62% 46% 57% 42% Has a positive impact on employee engagement Helps the company instill and reinforce company values to employees Helps the company retain employees Has a positive impact on company s financial results FIGURE 10 MORE IMPROVEMENT ACROSS THE BOARD Q. What increases have you seen in the following categories due to employee recognition? 57% 46% 28% 21% 32% 18% 30% 41% Yes, we use peer-to-peer No, we don t use peer-to-peer

5 / Organizations that spend more than 1% of payroll on employee recognition experience better results. SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 10 One critical question for HR managers has always been how much to allocate to reward and recognition programs. When we compared those who allocated less than 1% of payroll with those who spent 1% or more, differences emerged. Companies that allocated 1% or more of payroll to recognition see higher engagement levels, better retention and better financial results. They also have employees with stronger ties to company values. * Engagement levels show that 74% of organizations that spend LESS than 1% of payroll saw a positive impact on employee engagement from their recognition programs. However, when companies spend 1% or MORE of payroll, 85% see a positive impact on engagement. (Figure 10) * Only 33% of companies that spend LESS than 1% have reported positive financial results due to recognition. However, 59% of the organizations who spend 1% or MORE reported that their financial results have been positively impacted as a result of recognition. (Figure 11) * Finally, where only 60% of respondents who spend LESS than 1% feel that their recognition program has helped the company to reinforce company values, 77% of companies who spent 1% or MORE felt that recognition was instilling and reinforcing those values. (Figure 12) * 42% of companies that spend LESS than 1% of payroll felt employee recognition helped the organization retain employees. Of the companies spending 1% or MORE, 61% indicated that employee recognition programs helped with retention. (Figure 13)

FIGURE 10 HIGHER ENGAGEMENT LEVELS Q. Does your organization s recognition program: Have a positive impact on engagement? FIGURE 11 BETTER FINANCIAL RESULTS Q. Does your organization s recognition program: Have a positive impact on the company s financial results? SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 11 74% 85% less than 1% of payroll 1% or more of payroll 33% 59% less than 1% of payroll 1% or more of payroll Recognition Program Has a Positive Impact on Employee Engagement Recognition Program Has a Positive Impact on Organization's Financial Results FIGURE 12 REINFORCED COMPANY VALUES Q. Does your organization s recognition program: Help the company instill and reinforce values to its employees? FIGURE 13 LOWER TURNOVER Q. Does your organization s recognition program: Help the company retain employees? 77% less than 1% of payroll 61% less than 1% of payroll 60% 1% or more of payroll 42% 1% or more of payroll Recognition Program Helped the Organization Instill and Reinforce Corporate Values to its Employees Recognition Program Helped the Organization Retain Employees

CONCLUSION SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 12 More than ever before, HR leaders are looking for tools that will help them to show the business value of human capital and culture management. By transforming existing recognition into strategic, social programs that yield measurable data, HR leaders are beginning to see positive shifts in metrics that matter including retention, employee satisfaction, talent and culture management, engagement scores and financial results. From 815 respondents, we uncovered the following five findings: 1. HR organizations are concentrating efforts on longer-range strategic challenges, citing their top three challenges as: succession planning, employee engagement and culture management. 2. Organizations that practice strategic recognition are less plagued by frustrated employees, have higher levels of enablement, and have a better overall understanding of organizational objectives. 3. Organizations that tie their recognition programs to their corporate values report higher success rates with those programs than organizations who do not tie recognition to corporate values. 4. Organizations that practice peer-to-peer recognition empowering employees to both give and receive formal recognition see better results than those who do not. 5. When organizations spend 1% or more of payroll on employee recognition, they report a significant positive impact on metrics such as engagement, retention and financial results, compared with organizations who spend less than 1%. Next Steps Learn more about strategic, social recognition and how it can drive business results for you by visiting us at www.globoforce.com, emailing info@globoforce.com or calling 1-888-743-6723.

COMPANY BREAKDOWN SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 13 ORGANIZATION STAFF SIZE 500-2,499 48% 2,500-24,999 39% 25,000+ 13% Does your organization have U.S.-based operations (business units) only or does it operate multi-nationally? U.S.-based operations only 56% Multinational operations 44% Is your organization a single-unit organization or a multi-unit organization? Single-unit organization: An organization in which the location and the organization are one and the same. 13% Multi-unit organization: An organization that has more than one location. 87% What is the HR department/function responded for throughout this survey? Corporate (company-wide) 55% Business unit/division 26% Facility/location 18% For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and practices determined by the multi-unit headquarters, by each work location or both? Multi-unit headquarters determines HR policies and practices 46% Each work location determines HR policies and practices 2% A combination of both the work location and the multi-unit headquarters determine HR policies and practices 52%

ABOUT THE SURVEY The SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Survey was commissioned by Globoforce and conducted by the Society for Human Resource Management from August 31, 2012 to September 21, 2012. This is the third deployment of the semi-annual survey since its launch in June 2011. This edition of the survey was sent to 6000 SHRM members at a manager level or above. The final sample of the survey was composed of 815 randomly selected HR professionals who are employed at organizations with a staff size of 500 or more employees. The survey had a response rate of 14% percent and a margin of error of +/- 3 percent. SHRM/Globoforce Fall 2012 Report // 14 Results include responses from organizations in North America across a wide range of business to business and business to consumer industries. (Additional details about demographics are provided at the end of the report.) ABOUT GLOBOFORCE Globoforce is the world s leading provider of social recognition solutions, redefining how companies understand, manage, and motivate their employees. Innovative companies around the world use Globoforce s cloud-based social recognition software to reveal the true performance and influence of every employee and strengthen company culture. With Globoforce, HR and business leaders can take a strategic approach to recognition programs that result in measurable benefits to the bottom line driven by increases in employee engagement, retention, and productivity. Globoforce is co-headquartered in Southborough, Massachusetts, and Dublin, Ireland. ABOUT THE SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world s largest association devoted to human resource management. Representing more than 250,000 members in more than 140 countries, the Society serves the needs of HR professionals and advances the interests of the HR profession. Founded in 1948, SHRM has more than 575 affiliated chapters within the United States and subsidiary offices in China and India. Learn more about strategic, social recognition and how it can drive business results for you. VISIT OUR SITE: globoforce.com» READ OUR BLOG: globoforce.com/globoblog» EMAIL US: info@globoforce.com» CALL US: +1 888 7-GFORCE 2012 Globoforce Limited. All rights reserved.