Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

Similar documents
State Forest Land in North-Central Pennsylvania

PA Bureau of Forestry. Water Monitoring i for Evaluation of Potential Effects of Shale-Gas Development on State Forest Lands. Presented by: Ryan Szuch

MARCELLUSBYDESIGN: PLANNING FORESTRY WITHIN THE MARCELLUS CONTEXT RYAN WALKER

Where Funds are Spent

Marcellus Shale Gas Development in Maryland: A Natural Resource Analysis

14. Sustainable Forestry Principals

Using A Connected Landscape Strategy to Conserve Virginia s Forests

Forest Stewardship Management Plan

The following recommendations will need to be re-evaluated given the recent fire at the Kennedy Meadows Pack Station.

September 2016 ID Competency Statement Type

Forest Stewardship Program

State Forest Management: Pennsylvania

APPENDIX P EL DORADO COUNTY GENERAL PLAN: APPLICABLE SECTIONS FROM CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

The Fish River Chain of Lakes Concept Plan

The Fish River Chain of Lakes Concept Plan

Appendix 5A Priority Landscapes GIS Analysis Methodology

Pennsylvania Energy Impacts Assessment Executive Summary

Riparian Buffer Requirements. Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management

LOWER DRUM PLANNING UNIT Yuba-Bear River Watershed

(Draft) Addendum to 5-year Management Plan Mohican-Memorial State Forest

Riparian Vegetation Protections. Heritage Tree Protection

Community Benefits of Land Restoration

NATURAL RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP FOR HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATIONS

GEORGIA SOUTH CAROLINA. Location

Forest Stewardship Spatial Analysis Project Illinois Methodology March, 2007

Sustainable Recreation

Biodiversity Conservation

Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests Land Management Philosophy Overview

Private Forest Management

1/26/17. Senator Susan Glick Chair, Senate Natural Resources Committee 200 W. Washington St. Indianapolis, IN RE: SB420. Dear Senator Glick,

Warren Wagon Road Improvement Project McCall Ranger District, Payette National Forest Project Description

American Tree Farm System Management Plan Template

3/8/2015. What You Will Learn: Intermediate Use Areas: Considerations and Tools. Time line for Forestry Activities

State and Private Forestry Fact Sheet

Lake Britton Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT

AVALONIA LAND CONSERVANCY FEE LAND STEWARDSHIP PRINCIPLES

THE QUABBIN RESERVOIR Boston s Drinking Water Supply Area

TYPICAL CONTENTS OF A SITE-SPECIFIC NATURAL RESOURCE AND WOODLAND STAND DELINEATION MAP:

How to avoid getting bogged down by the Nova Scotia Wetland Conservation Policy

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Introduction. Lower Platte South NRD Past and Present 1. Map of Lower Platte South NRD 2. Vision for the Future 3.

DECISION MEMO OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (ODOT) SAND SHED CINDER PIT EXPLORATION PROJECT

SKIBO PROJECT SCOPING REPORT Laurentian Ranger District, Superior National Forest

PERMIT APPLICATION FEES Fees must be paid at time of application

USDA defers to the Department of the Interior regarding the impact of the legislation on the Department s programs and authorities.

Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the. Converse County Oil and Gas Project, Converse County, Wyoming

USDA FOREST SERVICE DAKOTA PRAIRIE GRASSLANDS LITTLE MISSOURI NATIONAL GRASSLAND MEDORA RANGER DISTRICT BILLINGS COUNTY, NORTH DAKOTA

Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

The Cool Soda Experience

Forest Management Planning for Marketing Forest Products

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan. What will you do with your woodland? Some landowners choose to let nature take its course.

Making a Plan for Your Woods

ATTACHMENT 2A- Issues Tentatively Resolved Decisions from the Board of Supervisors Hearing on September 11, 2007

PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION SITING REQUIREMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS

Wildlife Conservation Society Climate Adaptation Fund 2014 Restoring Oak Resilience at the Table Rocks, Rogue River Basin, Oregon FACT SHEET

MANZANITA LAKE PLANNING UNIT Willow Creek Watershed

Pennsylvania Bureau of Forestry

New Jersey Forest Stewardship Program Spatial Analysis Project Map Products And Data Layers Descriptions

11. Prioritizing Farmlands for Future Protection

8/5/2011. Lesson Overview. Disturbance/Fragmentation. Shifting Mosaic. Number one cause of biodiversity loss. Types of disturbance. - Scale, frequency

Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Forestry 2017 SFI Forest Management Public Summary Audit Report

DECISION RECORD for the Rattlesnake Negotiated Timber Sale (Reference:

DRAFT FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE APRIL 27, 2006 MEETING OF NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE HIGHLANDS COUNCIL

Watershed Management in the Crooked River Basin:

Bear River Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat BEAR RIVER PLANNING UNIT

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION WORKSHEET: RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Philmont Scout Ranch 2018 Public Summary Audit Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.0 FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING...

3-13 Other Required Findings and Regulatory Compliance

The Georgia Model Solar Zoning Ordinance

BURNEY GARDENS PLANNING UNIT Cow-Battle Creek Watershed

Environmental Trail Screening Tool. Legislation & Guidelines. Legislation/Guidelines. Implications for Trail Development

CLEARWATER TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Forest Stewardship Plan

Response: Eastern Shore will require additional permanent easement and temporary workspace (TWS) in the following municipalities:

District 12 - Lucas County Natural Resources Conservation Council Scoring Methodology =========================

Fontana Project Scoping Record August 2013

JUNE 20, Collaborative Initiatives: Restoring watersheds and large landscapes across boundaries through State and Federal partnerships

COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

How Much Habitat Is Enough? How Much Disturbance is Too Much?

DECISION MEMO MANHATTAN FUELS REDUCTION PROJECT U.S. FOREST SERVICE CANYON LAKES RANGER DISTRICT LARIMER COUNTY, CO

land more than 20 years ago and continues to expand these efforts.

Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Asset Mapping in the Rappahannock-Rapidan Region. Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Commission December 2015

CITY OF SNOHOMISH 116 UNION AVENUE SNOHOMISH, WASHINGTON (360)

CITY OF SNOHOMISH 116 UNION AVENUE SNOHOMISH, WASHINGTON (360)

Statement of. Tony Ferguson, USDA Forest Service Director of Minerals and Geology. Management. Before the. House Committee on Natural Resources

NSF International Forestry Program Ohio Division of Forestry Public Summary Audit Report

Forest Legacy Program

Alberta s Biodiversity Policy DRAFT

COLORADO STATE FOREST SERVICE. Orientation for Master Volunteer Forest Steward

In 2013, Gunnison sage-grouse was proposed for an "endangered" listing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under the Endangered Species Act.

FINAL DECISION MEMO. Wizard Falls Fish Hatchery Rearing Pond Replacement

Appendix B. WOODPECKER DESIGN CRITERIA

Goose Creek Watershed Assessment Summary October 2003

The Marsh Project: An Ecosystem Services Approach to NEPA Project Planning

Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone Comprehensive River Management Plan

CLAREMONT CONSERVATION COMMISSION CONSERVATION PLAN Adopted 7/21/2016

Transcription:

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure Dan Devlin Director, Bureau of Forestry www.dcnr.state.pa.us

Connection between Pipelines & DCNR Commonwealth s forests Fragmentation or reduction in forest cover Native Wild Plants Jurisdiction of Endangered & Threatened Plants Invasive species reduction of native plants State Forest Land Largest landowner in PA: 2.2 million acres State Park land LWCF & C2P2 PNDI Tool

Bureau of Forestry Mission: Ensure the long-term health, viability and productivity of the Commonwealth s forest and to conserve native wild plants.

The Bureau accomplishes our mission by: Managing state forests under sound ecosystem management, to retain their wild character and maintain biological diversity while providing pure water, opportunities for low-density recreation, habitats for forest plants and animals, sustained yields of quality timber, and environmentally sound utilization of mineral resources. Protecting forestlands, public and private, from damage and/or destruction by fires, insects, diseases and other agents. Promoting forestry and the knowledge of forestry by advising and assisting other government agencies, communities, landowners, forest industry, and the general public in the wise stewardship and utilization of forest resources. Protecting and managing native wild flora resources by determining status, classifying, and conserving native wild plants.

Focus of Today s Presentation State Forest system Established in 1898 2.2 Million Acres 48 of 67 Counties Created for: Continuous supply of timber & wood products Protect watersheds & conserve the waters Furnish opportunities for healthful recreation

State Forest land Management Zoning 11 % 0.6 % 23 % 53 % 4 % 0.4 % 8 % www.dcnr.state.pa.us

State Forest Values Clean Water over 5,000 miles of streams on SFL www.dcnr.state.pa.us

State Forest Values Wood products 14,000 acres harvested annually producing nearly 80 million board feet of lumber and pulpwood www.dcnr.state.pa.us

State Forest Values Recreation & Tourism over 5,000 miles of trails open for public use www.dcnr.state.pa.us

State Forest Values Habitat for thousands of plants and animals www.dcnr.state.pa.us

State Forest Values Scenic and aesthetic beauty

State Forest values Energy natural gas, biomass, firewood www.dcnr.state.pa.us

Pipeline and Rights-of-Way Infrastructure on SF Lands www.dcnr.state.pa.us

Pipeline Infrastructure on SF Lands Types of Pipelines Gathering: from well to transmission line Transmission: from gathering line or storage facility to an oil or gas market, regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Distribution: from transmission system directly to the customer, regulated by the Public Utility Commission (PUC)

ROW Infrastructure on SF Lands Substances Pipelines Could Carry: o Oil o Gas o Water o Petroleum Products (gasoline, diesel, etc.) o Natural Gas Liquids (propane, butane, etc.) o Municipal Waste Water Other ROW: o Electric o Telephone

ROW Infrastructure on SF Lands ~1,700 miles of ROW s on State Forest lands Miles mostly pipelines Of those miles ~1,100 miles of ROW s assoc. with BOF license for ROW agreements ~500 miles pipelines on gas leases or severed rights ~60 transmission lines (20-36 in; most over 24) ~3 gas storage areas: Wharton, Leidy and Greenlick

Pipeline Infrastructure on SF Lands Gas Monitoring Program 2008-2012 data collected 7 Forest Districts in gas play (core forest area) Acres converted to non-forest by infrastructure: Well Pad: 786 acres (53%) Pipeline: 459 acres (31%) Road: 242 acres (16%)

www.dcnr.state.pa.us

A closer Look Existing Agreements

www.dcnr.state.pa.us

Management Challenges All pipelines have an impact Surface disturbance Forest fragmentation Habitat loss & species impacts Invasive plants spread Loss of wild character Soil Erosion & Sedimentation

Management Challenges Most Impacts Considered Negative but are Positive as well Provide energy to citizens of PA Less truck traffic transporting Wildlife openings Recreation Opportunities

Management Given Challenges and Potential Impacts, our analysis take into account the mantra: Avoid Minimize Mitigate Monitor

Avoid Comprehensive Planning and Review Evaluate Alignment Alternatives (whole project scope) Learn & understand company and project objectives Use Existing Disturbances Overview of sensitive areas to avoid Endangered & Threatened Species (PNDI) Parks, Wild & Natural Areas, and High Use Recreation Areas

Minimize Reduce Earth Disturbance o Reduce ROW width/disturbance o Collocate infrastructure Appropriately Site on the Ground o Early Planning followed by Field Assessment Employ Proper Wetland/Water Crossing Techniques Buffer Resources (social & ecological) Timing Restrictions o Recreation o Wildlife o Spring Mud

Mitigate--enhancements Wetland Enhancements Species Habitat Enhancements Invasive Species Removal Trail Re-routes

Mitigate--Restoration Reclamation and Restoration o Larger landscape-level plan and management o o Provide Clear Objectives to Operator early in process Enhance areas for target species or habitat Shrub plantings Feathering Pollinator

Monitor Monitoring Important in Adaptive Resource Mgmt o Gas Monitoring Program o Administrate lease/agreement provisions o Monitor for: Planting Success Use of Different Plantings Erosion or Sedimentation issues ROW Maintenance

How do we implement Avoid, Minimize, Mitigate, Monitor? Resource Management, Non-Regulatory Systems Approach to Analysis Holistic Comprehensive Ecosystem Management

Look at Entire Project Connected with Pipeline Well Pad, Compression, Other Pipelines Trails, T&E habitat, Core Forests etc. Reason for Pipeline Alternate Routes Landscape Analysis When assessing impacts: Landscape Approach

www.dcnr.state.pa.us

GIS Analysis many available for analysis Forest Resource layers: SF Zoning, Forest stands/typing, Community Classifications Roads Trails

GIS Analysis many available for analysis Special Resources & Areas Threatened and Endangered Species (PNDI) High Conservation Value Forests Important Bird & Mammal Areas Parks Wild & Natural Areas TNC Forest Patches and Blocks Natural Heritage Areas Viewsheds

GIS Analysis many available for analysis Gas/Energy Infrastructure Well Pads Access Routes Compression Existing Pipelines/ROW s Water storage

Management Approach Staffing (ROW Team, GMT) Rights of Way team Gas Management Team Professionals foresters, biologists, geologists Surface Use Agreements Rights-of-Way Agreements License, Road-Use Encumbered Easements

Management Approach Guidelines and BMPs Gas Guidelines are our BMP s Planning, Buffers, Siting, Planting, Monitoring Adaptive Management Monitoring Program Infrastructure Plants and Wildlife Water Threatened & Endangered Species PNDI Tool

Management Approach Work Closely with Company Mutual understanding of needs, objectives and concerns Lots internal work/research on concerns and issues Work with company so they understand concerns and how plans and work can be modified

Management of ROW s Bureau has over 75 years experience Application and Review Process Communicate alignment/route concerns early Discuss future management plans makes easier down line Siting Guidelines Route Planning: alternatives, collocation/parallel Special Protection Areas Restoration/Revegetation Herbaceous/Tree plantings Invasive Management

Management Successes One landowner Flexibility and adaptive measures to facilitate best possible solution (for resources and pipeline) Work Closely with Company Mutual understanding of needs Co-location Electric/Gas cooperation (shared utility corridors) Use existing disturbances: collocate or parallel Minimizing impacts New Technologies

Management Successes Land Management Tradeoffs/Enhancements Forest Road system improvements Wildlife Habitat Enhancements Elk Woodrat Trail head parking Recreation Snowmobile Trails

Management Successes Invasive Plant Management New techniques for treatment Awareness increase Effective Plantings to decrease spread Invasive Species Removal

Management Successes PA Conservation Explorer: PNDI Tool Effective for large project and ROW planning New tool incorporating conservation planning and PNDI environmental review

Timber rattlesnake Enhancement Area Electric and Gas Co-location

Water Pipeline: underground Snowmobile trail: on surface

Shrub and Wildflower Planting on ROW

Shared-Use: ROW and Road Separates to allow for canopy closure & narrow ROW

Tree Buffer left in place Reduces footprint and visual impact

Pipe Installation in Ditch Line

Feathered Edges of Corridor Slight Bends in Line Reduces Visible Distance

Websites

Take Home Messages Pipelines have impacts Proposed development should be viewed holistically Management strategies differ depending on scale Some impacts can be avoided, minimized and/or mitigated Tradeoffs are usually necessary in resource management decision making (different than environmental protection)

Working towards a balance of Contiguous forests Wetlands Plants and animals Wild character Recreation Water quality Responsible development

Thank You