Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality

Similar documents
NORTH TEXAS CLEAN AIR STEERING COMMITTEE ROSTER

An Evaluation of the Correlation Between Shale Gas Development and Ozone Pollution Within the Barnett Shale Region

TRANSPORTATION AIR QUALITY BRIEFING. William E. Knowles, P.E. TxDOT-TPP October 16, 2013

Attaining Federal Ozone Air Standards: The Role of Transportation Control Measures

Environmental Regulatory Update

Texas Challenges & Texas Response

Technical Advisory Panel

Eight-Hour Ozone SIP Development Issues in DFW Air Quality Planning Section

Houston Ozone Past, Present, and Future?

OZONE IN NORTH TEXAS AND THE CLEAN AIR ACT

SIP Challenges in Houston-Galveston-Brazoria. Chief Engineer s Office, Air Quality Division

Distributed Generation. David C. Schanbacher, P.E. TCEQ Chief Engineer

ASSESSING CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR GROUND-LEVEL OZONE

APPENDIX E: RECORD OF NON-APPLICABILITY AND AIR QUALITY DATA

Dallas-Fort Worth Air Quality Training Manual

Texas Air Quality Nonattainment or Attainment-Maintenance Areas and Counties September 28, 2018

Oil and Gas Regulations and TCEQ Lessons Learned

2015 Ozone Standard. David Brymer. Air Quality Division. Presented to the 2016 Texas Transportation Planning Conference June 16, 2016

Presentation to Dallas City Council by Ed Ireland, Ph. D. August 1, 2012

DFW Conceptual Model Review

Air Quality 101. Presentation to the Transportation and Environment Committee

Air Quality Issues -- the Challenges

Baseline concentration and raw gas composition. Relevance for Shale Gas operations.

Emissions Inventory (EI): Reporting Requirements and What s New for 2011

Air Emissions 101. What are Some Types of Emissions? Oil & Gas Emissions: In Context VOC

The Road to a Cleaner Future

CHAPTER 4: CONTROL STRATEGIES AND REQUIRED ELEMENTS

Spatial Distribution of Criteria Pollutants within Region 4

~9~ Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS. DFW Air Quality and State Implementation Plan Update

Big, Beautiful Sky: The State and Future of Texas Air

Oil and Gas Drilling Linked to Air Pollution. Fracking Provides Many Opportunities For The Release Of Air Pollutants.

Prof. Daniel Cohan Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering Rice University

DFW SIP Development Update and Oil & Gas Inventory Follow-Up

Review of Ozone Emissions. Reductions Processes

START OF OZONE SEASON & OTHER AIR QUALITY UPDATES. NCTCOG Public Meetings April 2017

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - January 2012

Prepared by the Capital Area Council of Governments Air Quality Program. September 4, 2015

APPENDIX E EMISSIONS ESTIMATE FOR GENERAL CONFORMITY

LOCALLY ENFORCED IDLING RESTRICTIONS

Update on the Barnett Shale. Ed Ireland, Ph.D. Executive Director Barnett Shale Energy Education Council

EPA's Proposed Air Pollution Standards for the Oil and Natural Gas Sector Preliminary Analysis September 2011

New 2015 Ozone Standard and Implications. July 2016

Wyoming Natural Gas Waste Report

IMPLICATIONS OF BEING DESIGNATED NONATTAINMENT

Planning for Attainment: Ozone Advance

Tower 55 Rail Reliever Study

Crittenden County NOx, VOC & CO Emission Inventory Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment

EVALUATION OF THE INFLUENCE OF NON-CONVENTIONAL SOURCES OF EMISSIONS ON AMBIENT AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS IN NORTH TEXAS.

DFW 8-Hour Ozone SIP & Rules A&WMA Presentation May 21, Jay Tonne Kelly Keel TCEQ Air Quality Planning Section

COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT PERMITTING. Briefing to the Dallas City Council June 7, 2006

North Central Texas Council of Governments. Air Quality. Handbook Spring 2018

DRAFT MEMORANDUM TO FILE

Air Impacts of Shale Gas Extraction and Distribution

Overview of GP-5A, GP-5, and Exemption 38. June 8, 2018

Emissions to air and CO 2 footprint related to shale gas operations

WDEQ Winter Ozone Update. March 22, 2011 Public Meeting Pinedale, WY

What is idling? Or: leaving your car engine running when parked

Criteria Pollutants. Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)

Ozone Reduction Strategies

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT EXPEDITED BARCT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 617.

Chemistry in the Environment: The Clean Air Game

Ethanol and Air Quality in Minnesota

HEI Exposure Workshop July 2018

Final Revisions to the Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 )

Air Quality Issues Facing North. Jeff Saitas (512)

Changes in the Ozone Standard: What will the impact be? February 9, 2016 Sara G. Smith

Pursuing Regional Transformations: NCTCOG Initiatives on Electric Vehicles and Solar Energy

Spatial Pattern of Ground-Level Ozone Concentration in Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Area

Environmental Impact Shale Gas: Regulatory Insights

North Texas 2050 For a Future That s Better Than Business As Usual Fort Worth City Council September 25, 2012

Regional Photochemical Modeling - Obstacles and Challenges. Extended Abstract No Prepared By:

PHOTOCHEMICAL GRID MODELING SUPPORTING INTER-PRECURSOR TRADING FOR NONATTAINMENT NEW SOURCE REVIEW

Initial Notifications Concerning Emissions Inventories for the Natural Gas Industry

or Truth spotlight Happy Earth Day North Carolina s air is worth celebrating

Denver Metropolitan Area and North Front Range 8-Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan

GLOSSARY OF TERMS. Appendix B

METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN AIR QUALITY

Maryland Clean Air Progress Report

Gasland Hydraulic Fracturing in the Marcellus Shale

AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY ANALYSIS of the 2015 CLRP Amendment and the FY TIP

Introduction and Methodology

Additional Monitoring in the AACOG Region Based on Network Design Analysis

A Report Prepared for: The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. Prepared by:

Curtis Taipale Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment Air Pollution Control Division

Serving Two Masters; Understanding Texas and EPA Permitting Programs

Fine Particles in the Air

Natural Energy Solutions

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. OU Meteorology Field Trip October 20, 2017

Air Quality and Climate Protection in Fort Collins

FIRE APPARATUS MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

Imperial County Air Quality. Felipe Solorzano. San Diego State University: Undergraduate. Project duration: March 2014-August 2014

Air Pollution Sources Overview. Amy Roberts, Division Manager January 24, 2019

I. Overview. II. Background. Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Emissions Standards

Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)

Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Air Quality Report - September 2011

Outer Loop/Rail Bypass Study

Analysis of Ontario s Industrial Emissions Reduction Program

What is California Cleaner-Burning Gasoline and Why is Flexibility Required in California?

NOx Reduction Program

Arlington WPCP Solids Master Plan Final Report 2018 Summary of Public Comments and Staff s Responses

Transcription:

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality By Ed Ireland, Ph.D. A study on air emissions from Barnett Shale natural gas production activities was recently released by an engineering professor, Dr. Professor Al Armendariz at Southern Methodist University. Entitled Emissions from Natural Gas Production in the Barnett Shale Area and Opportunities for Cost Effective Improvements, the study was commissioned by the Environmental Defense Fund, a New York City based environmental group. The study was released in the Austin offices of State Representative Lon Burnam, D Fort Worth, who serves on the Environmental Regulation Committee. The EDF study focuses on the 9 county Dallas Ft. Worth ozone non attainment area (DFW NAA) as designated by the Environmental Protection Agency which includes Tarrant, Denton, Parker, Johnson, Ellis, Collin, Dallas, Rockwall and Kaufman counties. However, the study refers to emissions for the entire 21 county Barnett Shale region. The EDF study attempts to estimate emissions of the pollutants nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOC), hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), and of the greenhouse gases methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2). Estimating emissions of NOx and VOC is important because these pollutants can contribute to the creation of ozone during certain weather conditions. High ozone levels in the DFW area are responsible for the area being designated a non attainment area by the Environmental Protection Agency. The primary result from the EDF study was a comparison of the amount of pollutants which come from natural gas production activities in a 21 county area to that which is generated from on road mobile sources and airports in the 9 county DFW NAA. After 35 pages of analysis, the EDF study offers the following conclusions:

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 2 Emissions of ozone and fine particle smog forming compounds (NOx and VOC) will be approximately 191 tons per day on an annual average basis in 2009. During the summer, VOC emissions will increase, raising the NOx + VOC total to 307 tons per day, greater than the combined emissions from the major airports and on road motor vehicles in the D FW metropolitan area. Keep in mind that the EDF study is comparing the air emissions from cars and trucks to the air emissions from the natural gas production activities themselves, not to air emissions as the natural gas is burned in homes or by other industries. The study asserts that: All categories in the Barnett Shale contributed to VOC emissions, but the largest group of VOC sources was condensate tank vents. If natural gas production activities are responsible for the creation of more ozone than all the cars and trucks in north Texas, as implied in the EDF study, that is a significant finding. Therefore, such an implication deserves close scrutiny. A simple test of the EDF study s implication is to compare measurements of air quality in the area to the number of Barnett Shale wells that have been drilled. If the EDF study s implication is correct, then given the exponential rise in the number of Barnett Shale wells, ozone levels in the region should have increased or at least remained steady in spite of the emissions reductions accomplished in the 9 county DFW NAA over the last several years.

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 3 Instead, the graph shows that as more and more Barnett Shale wells have been drilled, ozone levels in the area have decreased (as well they should given the emissions reductions accomplished in the 9 county DFW NAA). This data suggests that there is no clear relationship between Barnett Shale natural gas production activities and the highest average ozone levels. So why is there no clear relationship between the number of natural gas wells and highest average ozone levels, contrary to the implications in the EDF study? There are several primary reasons. First, most of the natural gas produced in and around the 9 county DFW NAA is very dry gas. The reason, geophysicists say, is that this part of the Barnett Shale is thermally mature, meaning that these natural gas wells produce no associated oil or other liquids. This means that the vast majority of Barnett Shale wells in the 9 county DFW NAA do not require tanks for condensate storage. Little or no VOC is emitted from these gas wells. The following map shows the

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 4 approximate boundary areas of dry gas (pink), richer gas with condensate production (yellow), and even richer gas with oil production (green) in the Barnett Shale. Individual well data from the Texas Railroad Commission shown in the table below also demonstrates this fact.

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 5 9-County EPA DFW Non-Attainment Area Barnett Shale in November, 2008 County No. of Zero No. of Measureable Total % Zero COLLIN 0 0 0 100 DALLAS 8 0 8 100 DENTON 1,838 696 2,534 72.5 ELLIS 29 0 29 100 JOHNSON 2,290 110 2,400 95.4 KAUFMAN 0 0 0 100 PARKER 585 511 1,096 53.4 ROCKWALL 0 0 0 100 TARRANT 1,970 99 2,069 95.2 9-County 6,720 1,416 8,136 82.6 Area Sources: Railroad Commission of Texas; Powell Barnett Shale Newsletter. The results are the same if we look at all oil and gas wells in the Barnett Shale area, not just wells that produce only from the Barnett Shale. The table below shows that 82.9 percent of all gas wells in the 9 county DFW NAA produce zero condensate. 9-County EPA DFW Non-Attainment Area ALL in November, 2008 County No. of Zero No. of Measureable Total % Zero COLLIN 0 0 0 100 DALLAS 8 0 8 100 DENTON 2,080 900 2,980 69.8 ELLIS 29 0 29 100 JOHNSON 2,290 110 2,400 95.4 KAUFMAN 0 0 0 100 PARKER 2,920 825 3,745 78.0 ROCKWALL 0 0 0 100 TARRANT 2,051 102 2,153 95.3 9-County 9,378 1,937 11,315 82.9 Area Sources: Railroad Commission of Texas; Powell Barnett Shale Newsletter.

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 6 In fact, approximately 65% of the condensate produced in the 21 county Barnett Shale region is produced in counties west of the DFW NAA. Also, of the condensate that is produced in the DFW NAA (the other 35%) most is produced in the western and northwestern edge of the DFW NAA in Denton and Parker counties. Second, a basic flaw in the EDF study is that it assumes that wells in the 21 county Barnett Shale area that do produce condensate all have the same amount of VOC emissions per barrel of condensate produced, regardless of the production pressure of the wells or other site specific variables. The study noted: and oil tanks can be significant emitters of VOC, methane and HAPs. A study was published by URS Corporation which presented the results of a large investigation of emissions from condensate and oil tanks in Texas. Tanks were sampled from 33 locations across East Texas, including locations in the Barnett Shale area. tanks in the Barnett Shale were sampled in Denton and Parker Counties, and oil tanks were sampled in Montague County. The results from the URS investigation were used in this study to calculate Barnett Shale specific emission factors for VOC, CH4, HAPs, and CO2, instead of using a more general Texas wide factor. From an engineering standpoint, it is simply wrong to apply one VOC emissions factor to all condensate storage tanks located in the 21 county Barnett Shale area and expect a reliable estimate of emissions. This is because well producing pressure greatly affects potential VOC emissions from a condensate storage tank. Additionally, although the URS study had samples taken from counties within the Barnett Shale area, there is no indication that the samples themselves were actually from the Barnett Shale production zone. Also, many times these VOC emissions are controlled by the operator to recover valuable products or to meet TCEQ permitting guidelines. An even worse flaw in the EDF study was to assume that summertime VOC emissions from condensate storage tanks are 4.8 times higher than those during the rest of the year. This assumption is not even close to

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 7 reality based on thermodynamic principals and results in a grossly overestimated number for VOC emissions during the summer. Third, wind rose data from the DFW Airport (shown below for the month of July) demonstrates that during the summer months the wind blows from the west or northwest only about 4% of the time. Therefore, during the summer months, any VOC emissions actually emitted from condensate production tanks in counties west or northwest of the DFW NAA, and even in western Denton and Parker counties, is blown away from the DFW metroplex the vast majority of the time. The probability of any actual VOC emissions from these western areas significantly impacting high average 8 hour ozone values in the DFW NAA is likely near zero.

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 8 There are other significant flaws in the EDF study that are too technical to air within any public article or debate. The main point to keep in mind is that it is the TCEQ that is responsible for evaluating pollutant emissions in the DFW NAA and their impact on ozone formation. Based on guidance from the EPA, Texas developed a State Implementation Plan (SIP) in 2007 to address these emissions challenges. As part of this plan, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality released estimated figures for 2010 NOx emissions by source. The TCEQ considers emissions of NOx as the most important precursor to the formation of ozone in the DFW NAA, rather than VOC, based on sensitivity air modeling studies. This is why most of the major emissions control efforts in the DFW NAA have been targeted for significant reduction of NOx emissions. The TCEQ data indicates that the majority (38%) of NOx emissions in the metroplex area are from

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 9 on road vehicles, such as cars and trucks. Non road mobile sources, such as planes, trains, and construction equipment (including some of the emissions from natural gas production activities) come in a close second at 32%. Emissions from area sources (including most of the oil and gas industry emissions) come in significantly lower at 9%. As you can see, everyone across the board shares in the challenge to reduce emissions and improve air quality. The natural gas industry is no exception. For instance, as part of Texas 2007 SIP, compressor engines over 50 HP are now required to meet NOx emissions standards that are three to four times more strict than current EPA standards. The natural gas industry will spend over a hundred million dollars to install emissions control equipment on compressor engines and monitoring to meet these federal and state standards and to demonstrate future compliance. Nonetheless, the citizens can be assured that the natural gas industry will continue to work with TCEQ in a cooperative manner to achieve an accurate assessment of emissions in the DFW NAA and do their part to achieve the new EPA ozone standard of 75 ppb.

Barnett Shale Natural Gas Production and Air Quality 10 In summary, it is clear that the data in the EDF study does not support it s implication that natural gas production activities in the Barnett Shale contribute to ozone levels in the D FW metroplex to the same extent, or even close to the same extent, as on road vehicles. To the contrary, natural gas, including that from the Barnett Shale, offers a way to help clean up the air. Natural gas is the cleanest burning hydrocarbon and is considered to be the bridge fuel to the future of more renewable and cleaner fuels. Natural gas will be the fuel of choice for decades to come for electric power generation and in natural gas powered vehicles. Production from the Barnett Shale has been and will continue to be an important part of the total supply of natural gas in the United States.