BSI Smart City Standards and Mapping Research.

19/04/2016 Presentation Roadmap BSI s Approach to Smart City Standards Core Principles underpinning approach Overview of BSI s Smart City Portfolio of best practise Cities Standards Institute Smart City Standards Mapping Research Objective and audience Methodology overview Source of standards Perinorm Database Model requirements and 3 complementary views Keywords overview and main queries Some results and way forward 2

BSI Approach to Smart City Standards 19/04/2016 3

The principles that underpin our approach City- needs led portfolio approach A portfolio of materials addressing barriers to implementing smart city solutions promoting uptake at scale Tiers of materials Leadership Guides Management Frameworks Technical Interoperability Standards BSI Focus Relevance at all levels Leadership, to set direction and steer smart integrated improvements Mid & Small sized cities, that are often under-capacity and have capability issues Focus on Production & Dissemination 4

BSI Smart City Portfolio Standards Mapping Mapping of international standards to smart city model PD 8100 Smart city Overview Leadership engagement guide, providing useful assessment, and navigation to key BSI guidance PD 8101 Smart city Planning SCLP (Smart City Leadership Programme) PAS 182 Smart city Data Concept Model Intensive 2-3d programme supports pan-city leadership to refine vision; develop roadmap; identify leadership model Ontology that sits above data sets to make city data more discoverable Best practise for delivering smart development and infrastructure programmes PAS 181 Smart city Framework Overarching smart city framework addressing key issues in delivering smart prgrammes PAS 180 Terminology Basic lexicon of terms Published Planned/Under development PAS 183 Decision Framework for Data Sharing Decision making framework addressing wider datasharing issues PAS 184 Options & Good Practices for Commissioning new projects Leadership guide providing insight on alternative business models and use-cases to support these 5

Smart city development DELIVERED Smart City Leadership Programme PAS181- Decision-making framework PD8100 Smart City Overview Capability Assessment Vision, Goals, Strategy Performance Measurement KEY: Level 1: Leadership Guide Level 2: Mgmt Framework Level 3: Technical Std Resilience FUTURE City performance assessment method PD 8101 smart city planning guidelines PAS 182 Smart city concept model Smart Cities Standards Mapping PAS 180 Vocabulary Collaborative Procurement Enabling Capabilities Smart City Roadmap Data-sharing framework Service Transformation Data Privacy & Security Business Case, Models & Funding Citizen Engagement City Services Framework Use Cases (Street Lighting, Parking ) BIM Alignment Open Data CoP 6

19/04/2016 Cities Standards Institute Consortium of Partners Cities, businesses, government and other organisations Decide how new and existing standards should be developed and implemented Objectives Builds on existing foundations Create right conditions for future cities market growth Addressing key market barriers Standards uptake through urban innovation projects 7

BSI, FCC, BIS, DCMS 19/04/2016 SME WG CITIES STANDARDS INSTITUTE The Board Cities WG BSI Development Process Uptake of existing knowledge SMEs Others Steering Group Engagement with other initiatives Public Review Panel Cities Companies New Standards EIP ISO/CEN/ITU-T Other fora/alliances 9

Smart City Standards Mapping Research 19/04/2016 10

Smart city standards mapping project Core objective o Objective: overview of existing standards across all standards bodies not a list but a map of the landscape using a data flow model as inspiration for the search keywords o Audience: local government, industry and SDOs who are looking to develop necessary standards to help remove market barriers 11

Smart city standards mapping project - Methodology 1. Study and contrast a number of existing models and create best possible model for surveying existing standards 2. Choose keywords based on 3 view model - used to search standards databases 3. Keywords based on ICS (International Classification of Standards) 4. Combination of relevant queries constructed 12

Smart city standards mapping project Methodology cont. 5. Filter applied to queries to remove irrelevant results 6. Identify missing topics and refine results (iterative) 7. Perform separate searches for standards not covered by Perinorm, e.g. private SDOs 8. Verified with stakeholder consultations 13

Smart city standards mapping project - Output o Output - list of standards mapped on data flow model and classified: Technical: What needs to be done to implement Process: How which are the actions and steps to be taken to implement Strategic: Why which are the planning and management guidance 14

Core Standards Database - Perinorm The Perinorm database is used to perform majority of queries It is the world s leading bibliographic database of national, European and international standards More than 200 standards publishing organizations in 23 countries, with a total of more than 1,400,000 records and only current standards are included 15

Countries and NSBs covered by Perinorm Leading European standardization organizations: Austria (ON) Belgium (NBN) Czech Republic (CSN) Denmark (DS) France (AFNOR, OJ) Germany (DIN) Italy (UNI) Lithuania (LSB) Netherlands (NEN) Norway (AS) Poland (PKN) Russia (GOST) Slovakia (UNMS) Spain (AENOR) Sweden (SIS) Switzerland (SNV) Turkey (TS) UK (BSI) European and international standardization organizations: CEN (European Committee for Standardization) CENELEC (European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization) ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute) IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission) ISO (International Organisation for Standardization) ITU (International Telecommunication Union) 16

Countries and NSBs covered by Perinorm US-based standardization organizations: ANSI (American National Standards Institute) API (American Petroleum Institute) ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) EIA (Electronic Industries Alliance) IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) UL (Underwriters Laboratories) Non-European or American National Standards Bodies: Canada (SCC) Jordan (JISM) Japan (JSA, JIS) South Africa (SABS) 17

Mapping smart city standards model requirements Model should: consider the fact that there is no one-size-fits-all smart city solution be useful to support a mapping exercise and not meant as a technical design for a smart city solution or platform enable identification of gaps in existing standard initiatives make clear how data and information flow through the city and between elements in the city. 18

Mapping smart city standards: Model s technical view how sub-systems interact supported by ICT which enables interaction between subsystems city divided in built environment, infrastructure based sectors and service based sectors make clear data and information flow across city and between elements in the city 19

Mapping smart city standards: Socio-technical view of data flow data created in social & physical systems Technical Challenges: Social Issues: collected, transmitted, stored and shared analysed, displayed and used different actors at each stage Actions generating new data Owners of sensors Maintainer of web platforms Owners of data social and technical challenges 20

Mapping smart city standards: stakeholder consultation & social view strategic and process standards gaps new model view proposed to cover city actors, their organization, as well as smart city objectives social interaction between stakeholders is emphasised over technical data flow model showing urban areas final keyword search included this view 21

19/04/2016 Keywords and ICS International Classification of Standards For identification of keywords, the ICS structure and hierarchy is used: 40 fields at level 1 Further detailed in 392 groups at level 2 Finally 909 sub-groups at level 3 Standards may be allocated to more than one category In this study, interface between city systems is of particular interest Standards that fall in more than one field might indicate some form of interaction between fields 22

19/04/2016 Smart Solution Applications Supporting/Enabling fields Smart Solution Applications 23

Mapping smart city standards final 7 searches categories o Fields supporting smart cities (Set A) ICT, Electronics, Software etc.. o Additional ICT keywords (to complement Set A) Not in ICS o Smart city application areas (Set B) Sector/domain focus o Smart city topics (Set C) Not in ICS and not part of supporting o City organizational terms (Set D) Actors, Structure etc o Smart city objectives (Set E) Sustainable, Resilient, Job creation etc o Project management and software management (Set F) 24

The 5 Main Queries Combining searches to gain insight 1. (Felds supporting smart cities (Set A) OR additional ICT keywords) AND Smart city application areas (Set B) Rationale: Smart city supporting domain or ICT keyword (e.g. sensors or smart ) as well as an application domain (e.g. transport or healthcare). The results should provide standards on how the supporting fields can be used in the various areas, with a focus on integration and interfaces. 2. Smart city topics (Set C) Considered technical topics Rationale: Specific topics which may be relevant to the smart city (e.g. smart grid ) - keywords not directly linked to ICS classifications. Standards returned directly applicable in those areas. 25

Main Queries - Continued 19/04/2016 3. City organizational terms (Set D) AND Smart city objectives (Set E) AND Smart city application areas (Set B) Rationale: For each smart city application domains, standards related to cities organization and decision-making processes as well as objectives of smart cities. Results yields strategic issues with focus on each domains. 4. City organizational terms (Set D) AND Project management keywords (Set F) AND Smart city application areas (Set B) Rationale: Find standards about project management which are relevant to stakeholder and decision makers in the city for each application area. 26

Main Queries - Continued 19/04/2016 5. ICT keywords AND (City organizational terms (Set D) AND Smart city objectives (Set E)) Rationale: Yields standards where enabling type issues such as information exchange, automation and control and real-time are applicable to cities or any objectives for smart cities. Yields strategic type standards. 27

19/04/2016 Results of keywords searches Set B + (Set A or additional ICT keywords) Enabling type standards 28

19/04/2016 Results of keywords searches Set B + (Set A or additional ICT keywords) Cont Perhaps an opportunity? 29

19/04/2016 Results of keyword searches Set C Smart City topics 30

19/04/2016 City organizational terms (Set D) AND Smart city objectives (Set E) AND Smart city application areas (Set B) Perhaps an opportunity? 31

19/04/2016 ICT keywords AND (City organizational terms (Set D) AND Smart city objectives (Set E)) Wide range of topics mostly strategic and process related: A model for classification of quality approaches in e-learning Biometrics for public sector applications Business interoperability interfaces for public procurement Discovery of and access to e-government resources E-Tendering Process EU e-government metadata framework Open data communication in building automation, controls and building management 32

Mapping smart city standards Overview of existing standards across all standards bodies www.bsigroup.com/smartcitymapping 33

19/04/2016 What s next? The making accessible stage Standards categorized and tagged Different models specific to problem domain Queries through GUI 34

Saviour Alfino Project Manager Smart Cities Standards Strategy saviour.alfino@bsigroup.com www.bsigroup.com/smartcities 35

DETAIL OF BSI STANDARDS 19/04/2016 36

PAS 180 Smart cities terminology Open collation of 172 terms used across city services Smart city systems 75 Environment - 6 Public & Private service delivery models 27 Resource management processes 6 Technology and infrastructure 31 Finance and economy - 5 Mobility - 6 Governance 7 Lifestyle - 3 Community, education and skills - 6 37

19/04/2016 PD8100 - Route to a smarter city 38

19/04/2016 39

PD 8101 Role of planning and development Smart city foundation: development and infrastructure projects ideal due to scale to test/trial o Smart city products and services o Alternative business models and processes Recommendations to: City leadership Planning policy makers Planning case officers and Regeneration officers Developers and their partners 40

5 Key areas for integrated approach Partnerships/ Consortia Data Exploitation Digital Modelling Enabling Infrastructure New Business Models Agreements enable key city agencies to work together to deliver citizen-centric integrated services enabled by smart technology Data handling agreements and/or city wide open platform to allow information to be used to support operations and long-term decision making Get insight on people behaviour, asset performance and environment for neighbourhoods designed to support collaboration and innovation Plan and design early on for appropriate digital and communications infrastructure that supports new services and enable real-time data capture Create and test new transformational business models through 08/12/2015 integration of city systems and access to data 41

Planning and Development Guidance at each stage of the local authority planning and development process: o Local Development Framework o Detailed Planning o Development Management Guidance outside this process: o Major infrastructure projects o Streetworks and improvements o Refurbishment programmes 42

PAS 181 - Transforming the city s operating model 43

Source: PAS 181 44

19/04/2016 PAS 182 Model for data interoperability o Sectors have own models and terminologies o Data difficult be discovered by other sectors Example: Healthcare: Patient & Care Plan Education: Pupil & Curriculum Transport: Passenger & Travel Plan Overarching framework of concepts and relationships Describes data from any sector Reduces barrier to sector interoperability Focuses on the semantics of data from many sectors 45

What s in the scope? 19/04/2016 Does not cover following barriers to interoperability Compliance Privacy Security Validity Integrity Availability Quality Provenance Advocates shift to city-wide data-ecosystem To unlock potential of secondary use of data-sets Gain insights in citizens quality of life and behaviours To improve services and innovate 46

19/04/2016 Mapping a dataset to the SCCM Entity-relationships (Subject, Relation, Object) 22 Prime concepts 5 Group concepts Model represented in RDF/XML format 47

19/04/2016 Planning application data mapped to SCCM Data can be split into entities and published linked to model Can be combined and queried with data about other topics: What other CASEs are being considered in the area? What other SERVICEs does that local authority provide? What other DECISIONs have been made? 48

Saviour Alfino Project Manager Smart Cities Standards Strategy saviour.alfino@bsigroup.com www.bsigroup.com/smartcities 49