DESIGN CALCULATIONS INSTA-FOOTING LOAD BEARING CAPACITIES ON CONCRETE SLAB. January 14, 2017 Rev -

Similar documents
RCKW Kneewall Connectors

Footings GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 15.2 LOADS AND REACTIONS 15.4 MOMENT IN FOOTINGS

Reinforced Concrete Spread Footing (Isolated Footing) Analysis and Design. Design Footing

> 0. 1 f, they are treated as beam-columns.

Structural vs Nonstructural Members. Roger LaBoube, Ph.D., P.E. Wei-Wen Yu Center for Cold-Formed Steel Structures

Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)

Steel Roof Deck EC X

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS, EVALUATION SERVICES EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR STEEL ROOF DECK.

ACI Code Revisions Impact on StructurePoint Software

Originally Issued: 07/29/2014 Revised: 07/31/2018 Valid Through: 07/31/2019

One-Way Wide Module Joist Concrete Floor Design

Perma-Column Deck Post Design Manual

REPORT HOLDER: FASTENING SPECIALISTS, INC. 726 CENTRAL FLORIDA PARKWAY ORLANDO, FLORIDA EVALUATION SUBJECT:

BROADSPAN. LVL Design Brochure. Design properties for LVL header and beam applications in the U.S. for residential floor and roof systems

Perma-Column Deck Post Design Manual DP4430, DP4440, DP4640, DP6630, DP6640, DP6430, and DP6440 models

REPORT HOLDER: MITEK USA, INC. (FORMERLY USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS) SOUTHCROSS DRIVE, SUITE 200 BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA EVALUATION SUBJECT:

Stone and Masonry Veneer

Figure: Grid or Waffle slab

Atkinson Engineering, Inc.

Supplemental Plan Check List for Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICE EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR

REPORT HOLDER: MITEK USA, INC. (FORMERLY USP STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS) SOUTHCROSS DRIVE, SUITE 200 BURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA EVALUATION SUBJECT:

Steel Design Guide Series. Steel and Composite Beams with. Web Openings

AISI Newly Developed Standard AISI S310-13, North American Standard for the Design of Profiled Steel Diaphragm Panels

REPORT HOLDER: ispan SYSTEMS LP 70 BRENTWOOD DRIVE PRINCETON, ONTARIO N0J 1V0 CANADA EVALUATION SUBJECT:

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC.

DIVISION: CONCRETE SECTION: REINFORCING STEEL REPORT HOLDER: MMFX TECHNOLOGIES A COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: EPIC METALS CORPORATION 11 TALBOT AVENUE RANKIN, PENNSYLVANIA 15104

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS, UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS, UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES

Supplemental Plan Check List for Concrete Special Moment Resisting Frame

DECK DAMAGE AND PENETRATIONS

MASONRY WALL DATA: Wall Height = ft. Nominal Wall Thickness = 8.00 in. Depth to c.g. Steel, Wall = 3.81 in.

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

Two-way slabs. Flat plate with or without drop panels / capitals

Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MOMENT RESISTING MIDWALL BY THE STEEL NETWORK, INC.

A Guide for the Interpretation of Structural Design Options for Residential Concrete Structures

2016 AISC Standards. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings & Code of Standard Practice for Steel Buildings and Bridges.

IBC 2015 and Cold-Formed Steel Design Standards and Design Aids. Roger LaBoube Wei-Wen Yu Center for Cold-Formed Steel Structures

AMERICAN LUMBER STANDARD COMMITTEE, INCORPORATED POLICY FOR EVALUATION OF RECOMMENDED SPANS FOR SPAN RATED DECKING PRODUCTS

OUR COMPANY OUR WARRANTY OUR GUARANTEE

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS DIVISION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC. EVALUATION SUBJECT:

Design of Reinforced Concrete Slabs

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR HELICAL PILE SYSTEMS AND DEVICES PREFACE

PRICELESS HEADER & KWIK-JAMB SYSTEM IAPMO UNIFORM ER 0342

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR HELICAL PILE SYSTEMS AND DEVICES PREFACE

Code Compliance Research Report CCRR-0238

PRODUCT: Structural Insulated Panels (SIP) DIVISION: Wood and Plastics (06) SECTION: Structural Panels ( )

Investigation for the Removal of Steel Tie Rods in a Historic Segmental Arch Floor

CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

TCC/SHORE TRANSIT BUS MAINTENANCE FACILITY - PHASE II

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1

PER See all Pei ES Listings at: Report Owner Evolutiondeck Inc. 25 Industrial Court B Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada P6B5Z9

Foundation Design. π = pi ( radians or 180 ) ρ = reinforcement ratio in concrete beam design = A s /bd µ = coefficient of static friction

(800) (562) A Subsidiary of the International Code Council

Structural Technical Report I October 5, 2006 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

DIVISION: EARTHWORK SECTION: BORED PILES REPORT HOLDER: GEOTECH ENTERPRISES, INC.

Originally Issued: 05/18/2018 Valid Through: 05/31/2019

REPORT HOLDER: HILTI, INC. EVALUATION SUBJECT: HILTI LOW VELOCITY X-U AND X-U 15 UNIVERSAL FASTENERS AND X-P CONCRETE FASTENERS

PRODUCT: Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) DIVISION: Wood, Plastics, and Composites (06) SECTION: Structural Panels ( )

Report No Originally Issued: 05/2013 Revised: 07/17/2014 Valid Through: 05/2015

Code Compliance Research Report CCRR-0238

SECTION COMPOSITE METAL DECKING

Structural Calculations Amphitheater Middle School Building 400 AC Replacement 315 E. Prince Rd., Tucson, Arizona

Fire Resistive Design of Exposed Timber Structures

Guide to Attaching Exterior Wall Coverings through Foam Sheathing to Wood or Steel Wall Framing

calculated with factor of safety of 2.5 for bending stress, 3.0 for shear stresses and deflection limitation of L/180.

48.5% Throughput. 6 Connector 51.5% Plastic. 45.7% Throughput. 4 Connector 54.3% Plastic. 51.0% Throughput. 2 Connector 49.

Fundamentals of Wood Design and Engineering

Technical Report 3. Alyssa Stangl Structural Option Advisor Dr. Linda Hanagan L A J O L L A C O M M O N S P H A S E I I O F F I C E T O W E R

Table 3. Detailed Comparison of Structural Provisions of IRC 2000 and 1997 NEHRP (Continued)

COUNTRY MUSIC HALL OF FAME & MUSEUM

VOLUNTARY - EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING HILLSIDE BUILDINGS (Division 94 Added by Ord. No. 171,258, Eff. 8/30/96.)

Trusted ICC ES TEK USA, Evaluation. report, or as to any. ICC-ES Evaluation

SECTION NON-STRUCTURAL SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS

Lecture-06 Analysis and Design of Slab Systems

DIVISION: THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION SECTION: METAL ROOF PANELS SECTION: METAL WALL PANELS REPORT HOLDER:

Case Study in Steel adapted from Structural Design Guide, Hoffman, Gouwens, Gustafson & Rice., 2 nd ed.

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Issued February 1, 2011 This report is subject to re-examination in one year.

PRODUCT EVALUATION Effective Date: June 1, 2013 GDR-39

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS UNIFORM EVALUATION SERVICES EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR

Originally Issued: 12/18/2015 Revised: 04/14/2017 Valid Through: 12/31/2017

Trusted SECTION: 04 HILTI, INC. TULSA, Conformity! ICC-ES Evaluation. not specifically. Copyright 2015

A REPORT ON THE EFFECTS OF WIND SPEED ON TIMBER CONSTRUCTION JOSHUA HUENEFELD. B.S., Kansas State University, 2012 A REPORT

ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY COMPOSITE BUILDING

THE PLAZA AT PPL CENTER ALLENTOWN, PA

DIVISION: CONCRETE SECTION: CONCRETE ANCHORS DIVISION: METALS SECTION: POST INSTALLED CONCRETE ANCHORS

SJI Updates Expanded Load Tables for Noncomposite Joists / Joist Girders and Development of New Composite Joist Series

Schöck Isokorb Type CM

Listing Report: MUR Reissue Date: 12/07/17 This report is subject to annual review

INGHOUSE Page 1 of 48

ESR-2269 Reissued November 1, 2008 This report is subject to re-examination in one year.

Agricultural Hall and Annex East Lansing, MI. Structural Design. Gravity Loads. 1- Based on US Standards

DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FABRICATIONS REPORT HOLDER: QUALITY WAY PRODUCTS, LLC 407 HADLEY STREET HOLLY, MICHIGAN 48442

Product Designation As specified in the AISI standard for cold formed steel framing General provisions A5.2.

Section A A: Slab & Beam Elevation

Murphy LVL Limit States Design Guide 2.0 E-LVL 2.2 E-LVL

Transcription:

DESIGN CALCULATIONS INSTA-FOOTING LOAD BEARING CAPACITIES ON CONCRETE SLAB January 14, 2017 Rev - Projection Name: Owner: Prepared by: Insta-Footing Design Calculations Insta-footing, LLC Richard Nolan, PE Nolan Engineering, PLLC 333 Kinglsey Road Burnt Hills, NY 12027 Reviewed by: Robert Mann, PE Date: 3/1/2017 Page 1

REPORT DESCRIPTION This report documents the structural design of Insta-footing steel bearing plates and determines and certifies their load bearing capacity along with the load bearing capacity of the concrete slab that the plates are mounted to. INSTA-FOOTING STEEL PLATE DESCRIPTION The Insta-Footing plates are manufactured from ½-inch thick A36 carbon steel with a minimum yield strength of 36 KSI. The plates have an 18-guage, u-shaped connector that is welded to the center of the Insta-Footing steel plate. The Insta-footing plates have two 5/8 diameter holes drilled in opposite corners and two 3/16 diameter holes drilled in opposite corners used to secure the plates to the concrete floor slab with either ½ diameter concrete expansion anchors or powder driven nails or concrete screws. The plates are galvanized for rust protection required by the 2015 International Residential Code and powder coated in safety yellow for added corrosion protection. R407.2 Steel column protection. All surfaces (inside and outside) of steel columns shall be given a shop coat of rust inhibitive paint, except for corrosion-resistant steel and steel treated with coatings to provide corrosion resistance. R301.1.1 Alternative provisions. As an alternative to the requirements in Section R301.1, the following standards are permitted subject to the limitations of this code and the limitations therein. Where engineered design is used in conjunction with these standards, the design shall comply with the International Building Code. R301.1.3 Engineered design. Where a building of otherwise conventional construction contains structural elements exceeding the limits of Section R301 or otherwise not conforming to this code, these elements shall be designed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. The extent of such design need only demonstrate compliance of nonconventional elements with other applicable provisions and shall be compatible with the performance of the conventional framed system. Engineered design in accordance with the International Building Code is permitted for buildings and structures, and parts thereof, included in the scope of this code. DESIGN METHODOLOGY ASD- Allowable Stress Design for the steel plate LRFD Load and Resistance Factored Design for concrete Page 2

DESIGN CODE REFERENCES American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Thirteenth Edition, Part 14, page 14-4, reference (a) American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Thirteenth Edition, Chapter F, page 16.1-46, reference (b) American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Thirteenth Edition, Chapter G, page 16.1-64, reference (c) 2015 International Building Code (IBC) with 2016 NYS Supplement 2015 International Residential Code (IRC) with 2016 NYS Supplement ASCE 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI-318) and Commentary, Fourth Printing January 2011 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS Minimum concrete compressive strength is 2500 psi concrete this is the minimum concrete compressive strength permitted per the 2015 International Residential Code with 2016 NYS supplement. 2000 psf soil bearing this is fair assumptions for most soils except the most undesirable level slab, condition of slab is fair tight contact of soil/stone beneath slab, soil/stone beneath slab is compacted normal practice during construction Insta-Footing plate placement is 7 inches away from any slab edge this requirement is in the product instructions Page 3

DESIGN PROCEDURE The baseplate itself is checked to determine the maximum load carry capacity to ensure that it does not fail in shear or beading under the column load. Then the concrete under the baseplate is checked to ensure that it does not fail under the baseplate load in compression, shear or bending. The limiting load carry capacity of the baseplate or concrete is used to determine the design capacity of the Insta-Footing plate. STEEL BASEPLATE ANALYSIS The steel plate is checked to determine the maximum load it can sustain in bending and in shear stress. Per reference (a), the column baseplate is assumed to distribute the column axial force to the concrete as a uniform bearing pressure by cantilevered bending of the plate. Steel Plate Bending Stress The baseplate is loaded by a square or rectangular shaped column. It was determined that a 12 x 12 baseplate can sustain a 14,300# load. For this load the uniform pressure on the bottom of the baseplate is defined as P12 and is solved below. P12 = 14,300#/ (12 x 12 ) = 99.3 PSI. The column width is 3.5 for a 4 by 4 post. This leaves a cantilevered extension on both sides of the post that is defined as L and is solved below. L= (12 3.5 ) / 2 = 4.25 The bending moment on a one-inch strip is determined. The total force on the cantilevered section of the one-inch strip is the strip area times the strip pressure: F = 1in x 4.25in x 99.3 PSI = 422# The moment arm is one-half the cantilevered strip length = 4.25in / 2 = 2.125in Therefore, the bending moment is the product of the force on the strip and the moment arm: M = 422# x 2.125in = 897 in # The moment of inertia on the one-inch strip is calculated below: I = (1/12) x b x h 3 = (1/12) x 1in x 0.5 3 = 0.01042 in 4 Half the plate thickness is, c = 0.5in / 2 = 0.25in. The bending stress in the one-inch strip is calculated below: S = Mc / I = ((897 in #) x (0.25 in)) / (0.0104 in 4 ) = 21,521 psi Minimum yield stress of steel plate: 36,000 psi. Page 4

Safety Factor, SF = 1.67per reference (b) Allowed bending stress: Sa = S / SF = 36,000 psi / 1.67 = 21,557 psi S<Sa therefore acceptable for a maximum load of 14,300#. Steel Plate Shear Stress The shear area is the perimeter around the 4 x4 posts (actual post dimensions 3.5 x3.5 ) times the thickness of the plate: As = 4x 3.5in x 0.5in = 7in 2 Minimum yield stress of steel plate: 36,000 psi. Safety Factor, SF = 1.67per reference (c) Allowed shear stress: Sa = S / SF = 36,000 psi / 1.67 = 21,557 psi The shear load is the product of the shear area and the allowed shear stress: Fs = 7in 2 x 21,557 psi = 150,899# Figure 1 and Figure 2 below show the calculations above performed using the spreadsheet program Microsoft Excel. Figure 1 is for the 12 x 12 plate and Figure 2 is for the 16 x 16 plate. The calculations show that the 12 x 12 plate is capable of 9,150 # and the 16 x 16 plate is capable of supporting 16,650 #. Page 5

Steel Thickness Calculation for 12 x12 plate w/4 x4 post Thickness of plate 0.5 in Baseplate length, W1 12 in Baseplate Width, W2 12 in Baseplate Area 144 in^2 Load 14300 # Factor of safety 1.67 Pressure 99.3 psi post width 1 3.5 in post width 2 3.5 in cantilevered part of plate, w1 4.25 in cantilevered part of plate, w2 4.25 in Maximum cantilever length 4.25 in Bending moment, 1 strip 897 in # Moment of Inertia 0.01042 in^4 Bending Stress 21524 psi Yield 36000 psi Allowed stress 21557 psi ratio 0.998 max deflection 0.013 in L/D 317 shear area 7 in^2 allowable shear stress 21557 psi max allowed load in shear 150898 # Figure 1 12 x 12 plate calculation for shear and bending Page 6

Steel Thickness Calculation for 16"x16" plate w/6"x6"post Thickness of plate 0.5 in Baseplate length, W1 16 in Baseplate Width, W2 16 in Baseplate Area 256 in^2 Load 16650 # Factor of safety 1.67 Pressure 65.0 psi post width 1 5.5 in post width 2 5.5 in cantilevered part of plate, w1 5.25 in cantilevered part of plate, w2 5.25 in Maximum cantilever length 5.25 in Bending moment, 1" strip 896 in # Moment of Inertia 0.01042 in^4 Bending Stress 21512 psi Yield 36000 psi Allowed stress 21557 psi ratio 0.998 max deflection 0.020 in L/D 257 shear area 11 in^2 allowable shear stress(.66) 23760 psi max allowed load in shear 261360 # Figure 1 16 x 16 plate calculation for shear and bending Page 7

CONCRETE SHEAR STRENGTH Per ACI 318-08, 9.3.5, the strength reduction factor for compression, shear and bearing for structural plainconcrete shall be = 0.60. ACI 318-08 11.11, provisions for slabs and footings. 11.11.1.2 For two-way action, the slab or footing shall be designed in accordance with 11.11.2 through 11.11.6. 11.11.2 The design of the slab or footing for two-way action is based on eq.(11-1) and eq.(11-2). Vc shall be computed in accordance with 11.11.2.1, 11.11.2.2 or 11.11.3.1. VS shall be computed in accordance with 11.11.3. Per section 11.11.2.1, Vc shall be the smallest of the following: V C = (2 + 4 β ) λ f C b 0 d (11-31) V C = ( α Sd b 0 + 2) λ f C b 0 d (11-32) V C = 4λ f C b 0 d (11-33) Where β is the ratio of the long side to the short side of the plate. Since the plate is square in shape, β is unity. λ is unity for normal weight concrete (ACI 8.6.1). f C 1 is the compressive strength of the concrete and is assumed to be 2500 psi since this is the minimum compressive strength required in the building code. The perimeter of the punching section (b0) of the concrete that is calculate to be the width of the plate plus thickness of the slab. α S is 40 for interior columns, 30 for edge columns and 20 for corner columns. b 0 = 4 (l + d) b 0 = 4 (12 + 3.5) = 62in Where l is the length of one side of the plate and d is the thickness of the slab. Assuming a slab thickness of 3.5 inches, equations 11-31 through 11-33 reduce to: V C = 6 2500b 0 3.5 (11-31) V C = ( α sd b 0 + 2) 2500b 0 3.5 (11-32) V C = 4 2500b 0 3.5 (11-33) Page 8

For the 12 x 12 plate, b0 is 4(12+3.5) = 62 inches. For interior columns, equations 11-31 through 11-33 result in: Vc = 65,100 # (11-31) Vc = 46,200 # (11-32) Vc = 43,400 # (11-33) φv N V U (11-1) VU is the factored shear force at the section considered (the actual plate force on the concrete) and Vn is the nominal shear strength computed by equation 11-2 below. The smallest, limiting load is 43,400#. Applying the strength reduction factor yields the following concrete strength for punching shear strength: VC = 0.6*43,400 = 26,040# Vn = Vc + Vs (11-2) Where VC is the nominal shear strength provided by the concrete calculated in accordance with 11.2, 11.3 or 11.11, and Vs is the nominal shear strength provided by shear reinforcement. No shear reinforcement is provided in plan concrete so Vs = 0. Figure 1 Schematic of load transfer through concrete slab Page 9

Figure 3 & 4 below show the same shear calculation performed above for the 12 x 12 and 16 x 16 plate carried out in an Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The limiting concrete shear for the 12 x 12 plate is 26,040# and the limiting shear for the 16 x 16 plate is 31,080#. 12" x 12" plate ACI 318-08, 9.3.5 Punching Shear Strength Reduction Factor 0.6 Beta 1 plate dimensions ration lambda 1 normal weight concrete fc 2500 psi alphas 40 plate width 1 12 in plate width 2 12 in slab thickness 3.5 in shear perimeter 62 in Vc_1 65100 lbs eq. 11-31 Vc_2 46200 lbs eq. 11-32 Vc_3 43400 lbs eq. 11-33 Minimum from (1-3 above) 43400 lbs Adjusted for strength reduction 26040 lbs Figure 3 concrete punching shear calculation for 12 x 12 plate 16" x 16" plate ACI 318-08, 9.3.5 Punching Shear Strength Reduction Factor 0.6 Beta 1 plate dimensions ration lambda 1 normal weight concrete fc 2500 psi alphas 40 plate width 1 16 in plate width 2 16 in slab thickness 3.5 in shear perimeter 78 in Vc_1 81900 lbs eq. 11-31 Vc_2 51800 lbs eq. 11-32 Vc_3 54600 lbs eq. 11-33 Minimum from (1-3 above) 51800 lbs Adjusted for strength reduction 31080 lbs Figure 4 concrete punching shear calculation for 16 x 16 plate Page 10

CONCRETE BENDING STRENGTH Per reference (d), the modulus of rupture, Mn, for plane concrete is: M n = 5λ f c S m Where, λ is 1.0 for normal weight concrete, f c is the compressive strength of the concrete and Sm is the section modulus. The section modulus is based on the perimeter around the edge of the plate and the thickness of the concrete and is calculated below. The perimeter of the 12 x 12 plate is p = 4 x 12 = 48in. and the minimum concrete thickness is assumed to be 3.5 inches. Therefore, the modulus of rupture is: Sm = (1/6) x 48 in x (3.5 in) 2 = 98 in 3 M n = 5 x 1 2500 x 98 in 3 = 24,500 in # The maximum load on the concrete before rupture occurs due to bending was calculated to be approximately 9,150#. At a soil bearing capacity of 2000PSF, this would require that the bearing area of the concrete be 4.58ft 2 (658.8in 2 ). If the bearing area is assumed to be square, the length of one side of the bearing area would be: L = 4.58ft 2 = 2.14ft or 25.67in Since the plate is 12 long, the projection of the slab length required for bearing past the edge of the plate is: Pr = (25.67in 12in) / 2 = 6.8in The moment arm of the slab portion that extends past the edge of the plate is one half the projection length = 6.8in/2 = 3.42in. The pressure under the concrete slab in the required bearing area is calculated below: = 9,150# / 658.8in 2 = 13.9psi The bearing area of the concrete that is not located underneath the 12 x 12 plate is calculated below: A = 658.8in 2 (12in x 12in) = 514.8in 2 The force under the portion of the cantilevered concrete that is not located directly under the plate is the pressure stress acting on the concrete times the area: F = 13.9 psi x 514.8in 2 = 7150# The bending moment in the concrete slab is calculated below: M = 7,150# x 3.42in = 24,453 in # Page 11

The bending moment of 24,450 in # is less than the modulus of rupture of 24,500 in #. Figure 5 & 6 below show the same calculates performed in an Microsoft Excel spreadsheet for both the 12 x 12 plate and 16 x 16 plate. The calculations show that the concrete slab can support a bending load of 9,150# for the 12 x 12 plate and 12,700# for the 16 x 16 plate. Bending Calculations for 12"x12" plate allowable soil bearing 2000 PSF Concrete strength 2500 psi plate length 12 in b' 48 in d 3.5 in concrete thickness c 1.75 in Load 9150 # A 4.575 ft^2 area under concrete needed for bearing L 2.14 ft length of side of concrete bearing area L 25.67 in length of side of concrete bearing area Pr 6.8 in Projection past side of plate r 3.42 in Moment arm, half of projection A' 658.8 in^2 bearing area, in^2 Sigma 13.9 psi stress underside of bearing area A'' 514.8 in^2 bearing area of section not under plate F 7150 # force under perimeter M 24430 in # bending moment in concrete beyond plate edge I 171.50 in^4 modulus of inertial of leaf Bending stress 249.3 psi concrete bending stress Sm 98.0 in^3 section modulus Modulus of rupture 24500 in # ACI318-08, 22-2 Modulus of rupture 424 psi modulus of ruptur LSF 0.6 254 factored bending stress Figure 5 concrete bending calculation for 12 x 12 plate Page 12

Bending Calculations for 16"x16" plate allowable soil bearing 2000 PSF Concrete strength 2500 psi plate length 16 in b' 64 in d 3.5 in concrete thickness c 1.75 in Modulus 12700 # A 6.35 ft^2 area under concrete needed for bearing L 2.52 ft length of side of concrete bearing area L 30.24 in length of side of concrete bearing area Pr 7.1 in Projection past side of plate r 3.56 in Moment arm, half of projection A' 914.4 in^2 bearing area, in^2 Sigma 13.9 psi stress underside of bearing area A'' 658.4 in^2 bearing area of section not under plate F 9144 # force under perimeter M 32552 in # bending moment in concrete beyond plate edge I 228.67 in^4 modulus of inertial of leaf Bending stress 249.1 psi concrete bending stress Sm 130.7 in^3 section modulus Modulus of rupture 32667 in # Modulus of rupture 424 psi modulus of ruptur LSF 0.6 254 factored bending stress Figure 6 concrete bending calculation for 16 x 16 plate Page 13

Concrete Bearing Strength The minimum concrete compressive bearing strength, f C 1 required by the 2015 IRC building code is 2500 psi. The LFRD specification defines the concrete bearing limit state in Section J9 as Where: P U C P P P P = 0.85f c A 1 A1 is the area of the plate bearing on the concrete: A1 = 12in x 12in = 144in 2 PP = 0.85(2500psi)(144in 2 ) = 306,000# The actual bearing plate load is 15,800# which is less than 306,000# and therefore the concrete is acceptable in compression. A1 = 16in x 16in = 256in 2 PP = 0.85(2500psi)(256in 2 ) = 544,000# SUMMARY The summary table lists the strength checks of the various items, checked (ex. steel plate bending and shear and concrete shear, bearing and bending) and the last row is the limiting load. Analsysis 12"x12" 16"x16" check lbs lbs plate bending 14300 16650 plate shear 150898 261360 concrete shear 26040 31080 concrete bending 9150 12700 concrete bearing 30600 54400 limiting load 9150 12700 Figure 7 Page 14