Physiological Responses of Diverse Tall Fescue Cultivars to Drought Stress

Similar documents
CHAPTER VI TALL FESCUE ROOT GROWTH DYNAMICS IN RESPONSE TO DEFICIT IRRIGATION

FOR BETTER, SAFER SPORTS TURF. SPRING VOL. 26. NO. 1. IDEALLY IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO SELECT A TURFGRASS THAT CAN PERFORM WELL WITH LESS WATER.

TURFG. Turf quality decline of cool-season grasses during summer is a major problem in turfgrass MÊÊM2. Summer Decline of Cool-season Tlirfgrasses:

of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stoloniferia

were to rank the relative shade

The Effect of Endophyte on Salinity Tolerance in Perennial Ryegrass

Project Leaders: Dale Bremer1, Josh Friell2, Jack Fry1, and Andres Patrignani1. Affiliation: 1Kansas State University; 2The Toro Company

Turf Irrigation Series No. 2. Drought Resistance and Efficient Irrigation for the Cool-Humid Region

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF. Tod M. Blankenship for the degree of Master of Science in Horticulture presented on June 9, 2011.

The decline of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) putting

THE VIRGINIA SOYBEAN BOARD

Effects of High Temperature and Drought on a Hybrid Bluegrass Compared with. Kentucky Bluegrass and Tall Fescue

SUMMER DROUGHT: CAUSE OF DIEBACK IN PERENNIAL RYEGRASS SEED FIELDS?

Dr. James B. Beard, Professor Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University

Variety Trials. Recommending a single. Change over Time in Quality and Cover of Various Turfgrass Species and Cultivars Maintained in Shade

, DISSERTATION COOL SEASON TURFGRASS QUALITY AS RELATED TO

Cool Season Grasses for Stabilization. Selection, Establishment, and Use of Cool Season Turfgrasses

Herbicide Effects on Bermudagrass Turf

Rhizomatous tall fescue and regenerative perennial ryegrass performance in Ontario: Year 1.

Effects of Turfgrass, Cutting Height and Soil Conditions on Traction

IRON FERTILIZATION OF KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS. David J. Wehner and Jean E. Haley

A CO 2 Control System for a Greenhouse with a High Ventilation Rate

NUOVE PROSPETTIVE PER LE SPECIE MICROTERME DA TAPPETO ERBOSO

Creeping bentgrass (Agrosis stolonifera L.) is considered to be

GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF WHEAT SEEDLINGS AFTER DEHYDRATION AND REHYDRATION

COMPATIBILITY OF KURA CLOVER AND COOL SEASON GRASS MIXTURES IN MICHIGAN. P. Jeranyama, R.H. Leep and T. Dietz 1.

SOD ESTABLISHMENT & MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES STUDY FOR ATHLETIC TURF IN SAND BASED ROOTZONES. T.M.

Field evaluation of wetting agent efficacy against localized dry spot and hydrophobicity in creeping bentgrass putting green turf -AquaAid

op Science Report RESEARCH/EXTENSION

LEAF ELONGATION RATE OF MEDITERRANEAN AND TEMPERATE TALL FESCUE CULTIVARS UNDER WATER DEFICIT. Abstract

Salt-tolerant Turfgrass Mixtures for Minnesota Roadsides

Using canopy reflectance tools in turfgrass management

Natural rubber production and productivity have to be increased to meet the growing demands of rubber based industries

WARM-SEASON TURFGRASS N RATES & IRRIGATION BMP. Project 2: Effect of N Rate on Nitrate-N Leaching in Established Grasses DEP WM 869

K. Carey, A.J. Porter, E.M. Lyons and K.S. Jordan. Department of Plant Agriculture and the Guelph Turfgrass Institute, University of Guelph, Ontario.

Grazing Persistence of Perennial Cool-Season Grasses

In the Tall Fescue Division, Who is Georgia s Beauty Queen: 2004 Update on Tall Fescue Evaluations. Clint Waltz

Nitrogen Allocation of Three Turfgrass Species and Turf-type Buffalograss Management. Kevin W. Frank A DISSERTATION. Presented to the Faculty of

Equipment Performance for Determining Water Needs of Tomato Plants Grown in Sawdust Based Substrates and Rockwool

FINAL REPORT. Respond Formulation Effects on Localized Dry Spot Incidence and Putting Green Moisture

Field research at Kansas State University indicates that water requirements

PASTURE RENOVATION EFFECTS ON JIGGS BERMUDAGRASS PRODUCTION. Robert A. Lane 1. Abstract

Effects of Water Deficit at Tasseling on Photosynthesis, Development, and Yield of Corn

MANAGEMENT OF MULCH TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON CLAY SOILS

WATER SAVINGS FROM CROP RESIDUE MANAGEMENT

Competition for water is increasing between industry, the environmental and

Calibration of the Murrumbidgee Monitoring Network CS616 Soil Moisture Sensors

OBJECTIVES STUDY DESCRIPTION

Supplemental Lighting in High-Wire Cucumber Production on Raised- Troughs

Responses of Greenhouse Tomatoes to Summer CO 2 Enrichment

Ward Upham. Department of Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources Throckmorton Hall Kansas State University Manhattan, KS

Definitions. Background. Diversity in Urban Grasslands Effects Ecosystem Functioning. NYSTA Nov. 13, 2013 Research Update

Report to California Wheat Commission: GH Experiments

Climate, Soils, and Seed Production. Thomas G Chastain CSS 460/560 Seed Production

How to Create an Irrigation Schedule. Bernd Leinauer Professor & Extension Turfgrass Specialist New Mexico State University

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. College of Agricultural Sciences AN EVALUATION OF THE TRAFFIC TOLERANCE OF

Figure 1. Location of research sites in the Ameriflux network (from Ameriflux web site,

Surface Stability Reinforcement and Measurement. Thomas Serensits Penn State University USA

2017 Turfgrass Proceedings

Self-Study Course. Continuing Education. Water balance and nitrate leaching under corn in kura clover living mulch

L.M. Lauriault, T.D. Phillips, J.C. Henning, and E.L. Baker. Introduction

A-LIST: An Introduction

Cotton Crop Water Use. Craig W. Bednarz University of Georgia, Tifton

KEEPING livestock well fed during the

Seedling Establishment of Three Primary Cool-Season Turfgrass Species as Affected by Four Urea-based Nitrogen Fertilizer Products.

Proven Plant Health Benefits

Chapter 1 THE EFFECT OF MULCH TYPE ON TURFGRASS ESTABLISHMENT ON PLASTIC ABSTRACT

Methods of Irrigation Scheduling and Determination of Irrigation threshold triggers

LIGHT INTERCEPTION AND DRY MATTER YIELD IN GRASS/LEGUME MIXTURES. H.A. Jönsson

DROUGHT RESISTANCE OF LODGEPOLE PINE SEEDLINGS IN RELATION TO PROVENANCE AND TREE WATER POTENTIAL GARY F. DYKSTRA ', 1 :I,.

Plant Breeding for Stress Tolerance Part 1: Consider the Energy Balance

Elements of Defoliation

Developing and Implementing BMPs for Sports Field Water Conservation. Sustainability

Water Savings from Crop Residue in Irrigated Corn

Physiological Recovery of Kentucky Bluegrass from Simultaneous Drought and Heat Stress

Lawns. Background. Background. Background. Background. Background 2/26/2018

Other Design and Management Issues

WATER PRODUCTION FUNCTIONS FOR CENTRAL PLAINS CROPS

Factors affecting evaporation 3/16/2010. GG22A: GEOSPHERE & HYDROSPHERE Hydrology. Several factors affect the rate of evaporation from surfaces:

Osmotic Adjustment Associated with Variation in Bentgrass Tolerance to Drought Stress

Varietal Variation in Growth, Physiology and Yield of Sugarcane under Two Contrasting Water Regimes

EFFECT OF SOWING TIMES AND IRRIGATION REGIMES ON PHOTOSYNTHETIC RATE AND CO 2 CONCENTRATION AND YIELD OF SUMMER PEARL MILLET IN WESTERN MAHARASHTRA

Individual plot size was 5 x 10 and with four replications arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD).

Institute of Ag Professionals

Integrated Turfgrass Management. Nebraska Extension

Elements of Defoliation

Rhizomatous Tall Fescue and Regenerative Perennial Ryegrass Performance in Ontario: Year 1

In temperate climates, fall is widely considered the most important time for

Seeding Rates of Annual Ryegrass That Maximize Turf Cover When Sown During Traffic

Early Intensive Grazing Research in the Missouri Coteau Region of North Dakota: Year Three

SPRING REGROWTH AND STEER PERFORMANCE ON TIFTON 85 AND COASTAL BERMUDAGRASS PASTURES FOLLOWING SOD-SEEDING WITH RYEGRASS

A NOVEL SCREENING METHOD OF WATER STRESS IN MULTIPLE COTTON VARIETIES

Genetic variation in perennial ryegrass for root profile characteristics

Redacted for Privacy

Shoot strength and seedling emergence of a range of pasture grasses and seed lots of timothy (Phleum pratense L.) of different mean seed weight

Utah State University Evaluation of Ring to GREEN Final Research Report. Prepared by Kelly Kopp, Ph.D. and Paul Harris

토양의세립분함량과염분농도가 TDR 측정값에미치는영향고찰

Objective: Experimental Procedures:

The Effect of the Plant Growth Regulator Primo on Winter Hardiness Levels J.B. Ross, M.A. Anderson and D.K. Tompkins

Descriptions and Characteristics of Common Horse Pasture Grasses and Legumes

Transcription:

HORTSCIENCE 34(5):897 901. 1999. Physiological Responses of Diverse Tall Fescue Cultivars to Drought Stress Bingru Huang 1 and Hongwen Gao 2 Department of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5506 Additional index words. drought tolerance, Festuca arundinacea, leaf water status, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate Abstract. Drought is among the most limiting factors for turfgrass growth. Understanding genetic variations and physiological mechanisms in turfgrass drought resistance would facilitate breeding and management programs to improve drought resistance. The experiment was designed to investigate shoot physiological responses of six tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) cultivars representing several generations of turfgrass improvement to drought stress. Grasses were grown in well-watered or drying (nonirrigated) soil for 35 days in the greenhouse. Net photosynthetic rate (P n ), stomatal conductance (g s ), transpiration rate (Tr), relative water content (RWC), and photochemical efficiency (Fv/ Fm) declined during drought progression in all cultivars, but the time and the severity of reductions varied with cultivar and physiological factors. The values of P n, RWC, g s, and Tr decreased significantly for Rebel Jr, Bonsai, and Phoenix when soil water content declined to 20% after 9 days of treatment (DOT) and for Houndog V, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II when soil water content dropped to 10% at 15 DOT. A significant decrease in Fv/Fm was not observed in drought-stressed plants until 21 DOT for Rebel Jr, Bonsai, and Phoenix and 28 DOT for Houndog V, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II. The decline in P n resulted mainly from internal water deficit and stomatal closure under mild droughtstress conditions. After a prolonged period of drought stress (35 DOT), Falcon II, Houndog V, and Kentucky-31 maintained higher P n than did Rebel Jr, Bonsai, and Phoenix, which could be attributed to their higher Fv/Fm. This study demonstrated variation in drought resistance among tall fescue cultivars, which was related to their differential responses in photosynthetic capacity and water relations. The popularity of tall fescue as a turfgrass has increased with the introduction of improved cultivars. This is partly due to its good drought resistance (Beard, 1989), as water resources are becoming increasingly limited. This species is better able to avoid drought than are other cool-season turfgrasses, such as perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) or Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) (Sheffer et al., 1987). This difference has been attributed to tall fescue s physiological characteristics and its deep, extensive root system (Beard, 1989; Qian and Fry, 1997; Younger et al., 1981). Within the tall fescue species, cultivars vary in drought resistance (Carrow, 1996; Huang et al., 1998; Huang and Fry, 1998; White et al., 1992, 1993). Carrow (1996) found that Bonsai, a dwarf-type tall fescue, had an inferior visual quality and more severe leaf Received for publication 17 Aug. 1998. Accepted for publication 19 Feb. 1999. Contribution 99-41-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. We thank Drs. Mary Beth Kirkham and Jack Fry for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station and Kansas Turfgrass Foundation. The cost of publishing this paper was defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Under postal regulations, this paper therefore must be hereby marked advertisement solely to indicate this fact. 1 Assistant Professor. 2 Visiting Scientist. Current address: Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Science, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030031, People s Republic of China. Six tall fescue cultivars were examined in this study. Kentucky-31 is a forage type; Houndog V, Phoenix, and Falcon II are turf types; and Rebel Jr and Bonsai are dwarf turf types. Sod pieces (15 cm in diameter and 3 cm deep) of the six cultivars were collected from 5-year-old plots at the Rocky Ford Turfgrass Research Center, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan. Sod pieces were scraped and washed free of soil before planting in 15- cm-diameter 60-cm-deep polyvinylchloride (PVC) tubes filled with a mixture of 1 coarse river sand : 2 top soil (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic, Aquic, Arquidolls) (by volume) collected from the field. Plants were grown from Feb. to May 1998 in a greenhouse with daily temperatures of 24 C maximum/15 C minimum and a photoperiod of 14 h. The light regime in the greenhouse was supplemented with 1-kW metal halide lamps placed 1.5 m above the turf canopy. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) on a horizontal plane just above the 1 canopy at noon averaged 800 µmol m 2 s during the experimental period. Plants were watered twice weekly to bring soil to near field capacity for 2 months before the drying treatment began. Controlled-release fertilizer (17N 6P 10K) was topdressed twice prior to drydown to provide a total of 17 g m 2 N. Turf was hand-clipped twice weekly at a 6-cm height. The experiment consisted of two soil moisture treatments: a) well-watered control (plants were irrigated every other day until drainage occurred) and b) drought stress (irrigation was withheld and soil was allowed to dry for 35 d). Volumetric soil water content in 0 20 and 40 60 cm soil layers was measured daily using time-domain reflectometry (TDR) (Topp et al., 1980). A set of three-pronged waveguides made of stainless steel, 20 cm long and 3.0 mm in diameter, were buried vertically 20 cm in each soil layer. Trase TDR (Soil Moisture Equipment, Santa Barbara, Calif.) provided a digital readout of soil volumetric water content (SWC). The field capacity of the soil medium is 30% ± 2% (mean of four replications ±SE), which was measured in four PVC tubes with TDR when drainage ceased following watering the soil to complete saturation. Soil water content in the 0- to 60-cm soil profile averaged 28% (93% of FC) over the experimental period under well-watered conditions. Soil water content in the dry-down treatment declined to 20% (67% of FC) by 7 d, 10% (33% of FC) by 14 d, and 5% (17% of FC) by 18 d and remained at this level during the remainder of the drying period. Several shoot characteristics, including net photosynthetic rate (P n ), stomatal conductance (g s ), transpiration rate (Tr), leaf relative water content (RWC), and leaf photochemical effifiring compared with forage-type and turftype cultivars during soil drying in a Georgia field study. White et al. (1993) suggested that tall fescue cultivars differ in both drought avoidance, conferred by total root length, and drought tolerance, conferred by low basal osmotic potential; dwarf cultivars exhibited shallower rooting than the other types. Studies by Huang et al. (1998) and Huang and Fry (1998) showed that the dwarf-type MIC18 not only was sensitive to drought stress because of its shallow rooting, but also had inferior recuperative capability than did a forage-type Kentucky-31. Tall fescue cultivars also vary in water use rate. Bowman and Macaulay (1991) and Kopec et al. (1988) reported that foragetype cultivars used more water than did turftype cultivars. However, the differential responses of leaf photosynthetic capacity and water relations to soil drying among genetically diverse tall fescue cultivars are not well understood. Maintenance of transpiration and photosynthetic activity as soil dries may have an important influence on drought tolerance of tall fescue. Knowledge of physiological responses to drought stress may facilitate tall fescue breeding and management programs to improve drought resistance. Improved drought resistance would enhance irrigation efficiency by increasing the number of days between irrigation and maximizing water use efficiency. The objectives of this study were to: 1) determine variation in several shoot physiological characteristics of diverse tall fescue cultivars in response to drought stress; and 2) investigate the relative importance of water relations, stomatal conductance, and photochemical efficiency in contributing to maintenance of photosynthetic capacity in tall fescue cultivars under drought conditions. Materials and Methods 897

TURF MANAGEMENT ciency as estimated by chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm ratio) were determined at various times after dry-down. All measurements were made on six young, fully expanded leaves from different plants in each PVC tube. The P n, g s, and Tr were measured with a LiCor 6400 (LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebr.) at a PAR of 1000 µmol m 2 s 1 and a chamber temperature of 22 C from 1000 to 1300 HR at each measurement time. The variable fluorescence/maximal fluorescence (Fv/Fm) ratio was determined with a plant efficiency analyzer (Hansatech Instrument Ltd., Kings Lynn, England). Leaf RWC was calculated based on leaf fresh weight, dry weight, and turgid weight measured after soaking leaves in water overnight. The experiment involved two factors (six cultivars and two soil moisture treatments) with four replications arranged in a completely randomized design. Treatments were replicated four times in space. Treatment effects were determined by analysis of variance according to the general linear models procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.). Variation was partitioned into cultivar and soil moisture as main effects and their corresponding interactions. The comparison of moisture treatments within a cultivar clearly showed performance of each cultivar under stress conditions. Thus, the emphasis was on comparing soil moisture treatment responses within a cultivar. Differences among soil moisture treatment means within each cultivar were separated by a protected least significant difference (LSD, P 0.05) test and the LSD values are illustrated in the figures. Cultivars were also compared under soil drying conditions. The LSD values for cultivar comparisons are presented in the figure legends. 898 Results Photosynthesis (P n ). Leaf P n declined with soil drying beginning at 9 d of treatment (DOT) for Rebel Jr, Bonsai, and Phoenix and at 15 DOT for Houndog V, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II (Fig. 1). Averaged over the remainder of the drying period, P n of drought-stressed plants was reduced by 62% for Rebel Jr, 52% for Bonsai, 48% for Phoenix, 40% for Houndog V, 37% for Kentucky-31, and 29% for Falcon II, relative to their respective well-watered controls. At 1 and 4 DOT, all cultivars had similar P n, but that of Kentucky- 31 was the lowest (Table 1). At 9, 15, and 21 DOT, Falcon II had a significantly higher P n than did Rebel Jr and Bonsai. By 28 DOT, P n of Falcon II was significantly higher than that of all other cultivars, and the values for P n of Houndog V and Kentucky-31 were higher than those for Rebel Jr and Bonsai. Transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (g s ). Transpiration rate (Tr) was reduced by soil drying beginning at 4 DOT for Rebel Jr ; 9 DOT for Bonsai, Phoenix, and Houndog V ; and 15 DOT for Kentucky-31 and Falcon II (Fig. 2). During the remainder of the drying period, Tr declined by 65% for Rebel Jr, 61% for Bonsai, 53% for Phoenix, 44% for Houndog V, 53% for Ken- Fig. 1. Net photosynthetic rate (P n ) in six tall fescue cultivars as affected by soil drying. Bars indicate LSD values for treatment comparisons within a given day of treatment for each cultivar (P 0.05). Table 1. Comparisons of physiological parameters of tall fescue cultivars under soil drying conditions. Days of drying Cultivar 1 4 9 15 21 28 35 P n Rebel Jr a z a b c b c --- Bonsai a a b b b c --- Phoenix a ab ab ab b bc --- Houndog V ab ab ab ab ab b --- K-31 b b ab bc ab b --- Falcon II a a a a a a --- g s Rebel Jr a c c c a a --- Bonsai a a a ab b a --- Phoenix a b b b b a --- Houndog V a ab ab a a a --- K-31 a a a ab a a --- Falcon II a a a a a a --- RWC Rebel Jr ab b b c b b b Bonsai ab b b ab b b b Phoenix a a a b ab ab a Houndog V b a a ab a a a K-31 ab a b ab a a a Falcon II ab a a a a a a Fv/Fm Rebel Jr a a a a b c b Bonsai a a a a b b b Phoenix a a a a b b b Houndog V a a a a a ab ab K-31 a a a a a a a Falcon II a a a a a a a z Mean separation within columns and parameters by LSD (P 0.05); a > b > c.

tucky-31, and 37% for Falcon II, relative to their respective controls. Stomatal conductance paralleled as transpiration rate (Fig. 3). At the initiation of drought stress (1 DOT), g s did not differ significantly among cultivars. At 4, 9, and 15 DOT, g s was significantly higher for Bonsai, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II than for Rebel Jr and Phoenix (Table 1). By 28 DOT of drying, g s was reduced to low levels in all cultivars and did not differ significantly among cultivars. Cultivar variation in Tr in response to soil drying followed the same pattern as g s (Fig. 2). Relative leaf water content (RWC). During drying, RWC declined to a level below that of the well-watered controls starting at 4 DOT for Rebel Jr and Bonsai, and 9 DOT for Phoenix, Houndog V, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II (Fig. 4). When RWC had decreased to 30% to 40%, leaves became permanently wilted (without rehydration early in the morning), which occurred at 21 DOT for Rebel Jr, Bonsai, and Phoenix and at 28 DOT for Houndog V, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II. At 4, 9, 21, 28, and 25 DOT, Falcon II and Houndog V had higher RWC than did Rebel Jr and Bonsai (Table 1). Leaf photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm). Soil drying did not reduce Fv/Fm ratio significantly until 21 DOT for Rebel Jr, Bonsai, and Phoenix and 28 DOT for Houndog V, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II (Fig. 5). The Fv/Fm ratio did not differ significantly between cultivars before 15 DOT (Table 1). At 21, 28, and 35 DOT, Houndog V, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II maintained significantly higher Fv/Fm ratios than did Rebel Jr, Bonsai, and Phoenix. Fig. 2. Transpiration rate in six tall fescue cultivars as affected by soil drying. Bars indicate LSD values for treatment comparisons within a given day of treatment for each cultivar (P 0.05). Discussion Previous research based on turf quality, leaf wilting, and rooting has suggested that dwarf turf type cultivars of tall fescue have poorer drought resistance than turf-type or forage-type cultivars (Carrow, 1996; Huang and Fry, 1998; Huang et al., 1998; White et al., 1991, 1993). Various physiological responses (P n, Tr, g s, RWC, and Fv/Fm) in the present study also indicated that drought resistance of dwarf turf type cultivars Rebel Jr and Bonsai was inferior to that of the turf type ( Phoenix, Houndog V, and Falcon II ) and forage type ( Kentucky-31 ). Falcon II appeared to be more drought resistant than Phoenix, but similar to Houndog V and Kentucky-31, based on the responses of P n, g s, and Fv/Fm to prolonged periods of drought. Better performance and delayed leaf rolling of turf-type cultivars of tall fescue during drought stress have been attributed to low basal osmotic potential before stress, osmotic adjustment, prolonged turgor maintenance (White et al., 1992, 1993), and deep rooting (Carrow, 1996; Huang and Fry, 1998). Our study indicated that maintenance of photosynthetic activity and favorable transpiration during dry-down could be an important contributor to drought tolerance in tall fescue cultivars. Reductions in photosynthesis generally are considered to be the result of reduced avail- Fig. 3. Stomatal conductance (g s ) in six tall fescue cultivars as affected by soil drying. Bars indicate LSD values for treatment comparisons within a given day of treatment for each cultivar (P 0.05). 899

TURF MANAGEMENT Fig. 4. Relative leaf water content (RWC) in six tall fescue cultivars as affected by soil drying. Bars indicate LSD values for treatment comparisons within a given day of treatment for each cultivar (P 0.05). ability of CO 2 because of stomatal closure (Kaiser, 1987; Schulze, 1986) or nonstomatal factors, such as photoinhibition or damage to chloroplast biochemistry or chlorophyll fluorescence (Baker, 1993; Krause and Weis, 1991). Chlorophyll fluorescence is proportional to the photochemical efficiency of leaves (Baker, 1993). In the present study, decline in P n occurred and was accompanied by partial stomatal closure, as indicated by the reduced g s and Tr, when soil water content declined to 10% to 20% (33% to 67% of FC) and RWC declined to 60%. Photosynthetic rate was more sensitive to decline in soil moisture for Rebel Jr, Bonsai, and Phoenix than for Houndog V, Kentucky-31, and Falcon II. However, drought stress did not induce decreases in Fv/Fm in any cultivar until RWC decreased to 30% to 40%. The decline in P n in tall fescue cultivars appeared to be controlled mostly by stomatal closure under moderate drought-stress conditions. When permanent leaf wilting occurred after a prolonged period of drought stress (35 DOT), the cultivars that maintained higher Fv/ Fm ratios ( Falcon II, Houndog V, and Kentucky-31 ) also had higher P n than did the other cultivars, although their g s and Tr values were not different. This suggests that maintenance of photosynthetic capacity under severe stress condition could be associated with less damage to the photosynthetic apparatus. In a previous study, Huang et al. (1998) reported that the Fv/Fm ratio was reversible when soil was rewet following a 14-d dry-down, but became irreversible following a 21-d dry-down, at which time soil moisture had declined <10% and RWC was <30% in Kentucky-31 and MIC18. Kaiser (1987) reported that an irreversible decrease in photosynthetic capacity occurs as RWC drops <30%, leading to cell death from membrane damage in chloroplasts. In summary, tall fescue cultivars, even within the same type, varied in water relations and photosynthetic responses to drought stress. Use of drought-resistant cultivars would reduce water use. The decline in P n during shortterm drought stress was due mostly to internal water deficit and stomatal closure. During a prolonged period of drought stress, high P n could be attributed to high photochemical efficiency. Photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate could be used as drought stress indicators in selecting for drought resistance in tall fescue. Literature Cited Fig. 5. Photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) in six tall fescue cultivars as affected by soil drying. Bars indicate LSD values for treatment comparisons within a given day of treatment for each cultivar (P 0.05). 900 Baker, N.R. 1993. Light-use efficiency and inhibition of photosynthesis in plants under environmental stress, p. 221 235. In: J.A.C. Smith and H. Griffiths (eds.). Water deficits Plant responses from cell to community. Bios Scientific, Oxford, U.K. Beard, J.B. 1989. Turfgrass water stress: Drought resistance components, physiological mechanisms, and species genotype diversity, p. 23 28. In: H. Takatoh (ed.). Proc. 6th Intl. Turf. Sci. Soc., Jpn. Soc. Turf. Sci. Tokyo. Bowman, D.C. and L. Macaulay. 1991. Comparative evapotranspiration rates of tall fescue cultivars. HortScience 26:122 123.

Carrow, R.N. 1996. Drought avoidance characteristics of diverse tall fescue cultivars. Crop Sci. 36:371 377. Huang, B. and J.D. Fry 1998. Root anatomical, morphological, and physiological responses to drought stress for tall fescue cultivars. Crop Sci. 38:1017 1022. Huang, B., J.D. Fry, and B. Wang. 1998. Water relations and canopy characteristics of tall fescue cultivars during and after drought stress. HortScience 33:837 840. Kaiser, W.M. 1987. Effects of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. Physiol. Plant. 71:142 149. Kopec, D.M., R.C. Shearman, and T.P. Riordan. 1988. Evapotranspiration of tall fescue turf. HortScience 23:300 301. Krause, G.H. and E. Weis. 1991. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: The basics. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42:313 349. Qian, Y. and J.D. Fry. 1997. Rooting and drought avoidance of warm-season turfgrasses and tall fescue in Kansas. Crop Sci. 37:905 910. Schulze, E.D. 1986. Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and the soil. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. 37:247 274. Sheffer, K.M., J.H. Dunn, and D.D. Minner. 1987. Summer drought responses and rooting depth of three cool-season turfgrasses. HortScience 22:296 297. Topp, G.C., J.L. Davis, and A.P. Annan. 1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resource Res. 16:574 582. White, R.H., A.H. Bruneau, and T.J. Cowett. 1993. Drought resistance of diverse tall fescue cultivars. Intl. Turf. Soc. Res. J. 7:607 613. White, R.H., M.C. Engelke, S.J. Morton, and B.A. Ruemmele. 1992. Competitive turgor maintenance in tall fescue. Crop Sci. 32:251 256. Younger, V.B., A.W. Marsh, R.A. Strohman, V.A. Gibeault, and S. Spalding. 1981. Water use and quality of warm-season and cool-season turfgrasses, p. 257 259. In: R.W. Sheard (ed.). Proc. 4th Intl. Turf. Sci. Soc., Univ. of Guelph, Ont., Canada. 901