General Instream Flow Methods Overview. Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24, 2011

Similar documents
Environmental Flows Allocation Process in Texas. Kevin Mayes Texas Parks and Wildlife Department March 2010

Flow-ecology relationships. Flow-ecology relationships Susitna case study

Stevens Creek Steelhead Limiting Factors Analysis. Stillwater Sciences

Overview of the Instream Flow/Fish Habitat Element of the WRIA 1 Watershed Management Project. By Jeremy Freimund, P.H.

Appendix I: Fixed-400,000 af Flood Storage Operation

Establishing Environmental Flows for California Streams. Eric Stein Southern California Coastal Water Research Project

Lower Yuba River Accord Monitoring and Evaluation Program Interim Report

Fish and Aquatics Instream Flow

F7 Stream Reach Summary

5/1/2013. Puget Sound Conditions. LID research, data, guidelines, specifications, and regulations are evolving rapidly.

Hood River Basin Study

Ongoing and Completed Studies

Quality metrics; dg, d50, Fi, So,

Environmental Flow Regimes. Joe Trungale s presentation to the Science Advisory Committee March 4, 2009

Comments from 4/12 - Draft Responses

Cedar River Watershed Habitat Conservation Plan

SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Hood River Basin Study

Restoration of Riparian Forests and Riparian Ecosystem Processes and Implications for Salmon Restoration. Katie Ross-Smith Jennifer Hammond

Outline. Regional Overview Mine Study Area. Transportation Corridor Study Area. Streamflow Low Flow Peak Flow Snow Small Pools.

Impacts of Permit-Exempt Wells

Science Supporting Policy: The Case For Flow Quantity

Climate Change & the Tongass NF: Potential Impacts on Freshwater Ecosystems. Gordon H. Reeves US Forest Service PNW Research Station

Management Objectives and Targets

Wapato Access Feasibility Study

Otter Creek Watershed TMDL Project. Stakeholder Meeting June 6, 2013

Fall 2013 HFE Protocol Decision Process

Lecture 9A: Drainage Basins

Natural Gas Development in the Susquehanna River Basin. Jennifer Hoffman September 29, 2010 Pittsburgh, PA

Instream Flows in the San Antonio River Basin From Science to Environmental flow Standards. Steven J. Raabe, P.E

Sturgeon & Habitat Response to Gavins Point Flow Modification Purpose Questions Plan to address questions Description of activities

Hood River Water Conservation Strategy: achieving long-term water resource reliability for agriculture & local fish populations

Instream Flows in the San Antonio River Basin From Science to Environmental flow Standards. Steven J. Raabe, P.E

United States Department of the Interior

SURFACE WATER WITHDRAWALS & LOW FLOW PROTECTION POLICY MICHAEL COLLEGE, P.E. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

EVALUATION OF THE POTENTIAL FOR IMPACTS ON SALMONID MIGRATION ASSOCIATED WITH CIRCULATION OF SALINE POND WATER DURING THE INITIAL STEWARDSHIP PERIOD

Camp Far West Hydroelectric Project Relicensing

Hood River Basin Study

Environmental Flows for the Galveston Bay Estuary. Scott A. Jones Environmental Policy & Outreach Galveston Bay Foundation

Assessment of Agricultural Flood Damages Along the James River in South Dakota

Duncan Dam Project Water Use Plan Monitoring Program Terms of Reference. DDMMON-16 Lower Duncan River Fish Stranding Impact Monitoring

Study 7.5 Groundwater

Real time Water Quality Monitoring

PEACE RIVER MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING December 5, 2018 ROUTINE STATUS REPORTS ITEM 1

Watershed - Lake Model to Support TMDL Determinations for Lake Thunderbird

The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology

Instream Flow Protection Efforts in Pennsylvania

1/30/2014. SR-BOK Outcomes. Sue Niezgoda, Gonzaga University January 28, Depth. Breadth

The Impacts of Climate Change on Portland s Water Supply

Climate Change and Fish in the Pacific Northwest: Case Study of the Snoqualmie River Basin

Regional Habitat Indicators Project. Workshop #1. Nov 9, 2016

Electric Forward Market Report

Scott River and Shasta River. Instream Flow Study Plan Development Orientation Meetings November 13 and 14, 2012

Modeling the Middle and Lower Cape Fear River using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool Sam Sarkar Civil Engineer

Environmental Environmental Flows Rebecca Tharme PhD Riverfutures Nile Eco

Water Planning and Stewardship Committee Item 6a February 8, 2016

Salinity TMDL Development and Modeling in the Otter Creek Watershed. Erik Makus DEQ Hydrologist June 6, 2013

From the cornbeltto the north woods; understanding the response of Minnesota. Chris Lenhart Research Assistant Professor BBE Department

Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration & Fish Passage

Irrigation modeling in Prairie Ronde Township, Kalamazoo County. SW Michigan Water Resources Council meeting May 15, 2012

The Contribution of Irrigation Seepage to Groundwater-Surface Water Interactions on the Snake River Plain, Idaho

Monitoring Networks for Assessing Small Stream Hydropower Potential, Cosmos Hills, Alaska

Warm Springs Hydro LLC 5203 South 11 th East Idaho Falls, ID

Overview of the Surface Hydrology of Hawai i Watersheds. Ali Fares Associate Professor of Hydrology NREM-CTAHR

ICELANDIC RIVER / WASHOW BAY CREEK INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN STATE OF THE WATERSHED REPORT CONTRIBUTION SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY REPORT

What is Run-of-river hydro?

Intro to sustainable hydropower and environmental flows

Water Supply Board Briefing. Water Operations Department March 22, 2016

CVC & TRCA Water Balance Guidelines for the Protection of Natural Features

1:24K Fish Habitat Distribution Development Project. Data Format Outlines and Data Compilation Protocols

San Joaquin River Restoration Program Restoration Administrator

Restoring River-floodplain Connectivity for Fish Spawning and Nursery in the Lower Missouri River: Use of a Constructed Fish Passage Facility

Lower Yuba River Redd Dewatering and Fry Stranding Study 2008 Annual Report

Coquitlam-Buntzen Water Use Plan

Ecological Flow Assessments in Eastern U.S. Basins Tara Moberg. December 10, 2014 NAS Roundtable on Science and Technology for Sustainability

Section 4. Mono Basin Tributaries: Lee Vining, Rush, Walker, and Parker Creeks. Monitoring Results and Analysis For Runoff Season

RESPONSE TO FEBRUARY 16, 2018 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, RESOURCE AGENCY LATE FILING, AND OTHER RELATED INFORMATION ATTACHMENT T

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Sobhalatha Kunjikutty

WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE PLAN

Climate Change Impacts for the Central Coast and Hunter Regions

Analysis of Vermillion River Stream Flow Data (Dakota and Scott Counties, Minnesota)

City of San Clemente Water Usage Report

Introducing the WBG Guidelines for selecting EFlow assessment methods. Cate Brown

Nichole M. Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District. May 2, 2012 Abbotsford-Sumas Aquifer Groundwater Nitrate Science Forum Abbotsford, CN

Change for Western North America. Hydrologic Implications of Climate. and the Columbia River Basin. Dennis P. Lettenmaier. Alan F.

Recovery of the Great Salt Lake Brine Shrimp Population

Meacham Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement: Application of the CTUIR River Vision

Working with the Water Balance

Lower Tuolumne River Water Temperature Modeling Final Study Plan

Appendix B. Input Assumptions and Flow Parameter Values Used In CALSIM II and DMS2 Modeling

Piloting Utility Modeling Applications: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

Hydrology in Western Colorado: Planning for Resilience

An Investigation into the 2012 drought on Apalachicola River. Steve Leitman, Bill Pine and Greg Kiker

FISHER RIVER INTEGRATED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN STATE OF THE WATERSHED REPORT CONTRIBUTION SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY REPORT

Climate Change & Urbanization Have Changed River Flows in Ontario

Heng Suthy, Regional Coordinator for CS, MRCS Regional Stakeholder Forum on Council Study 22 Feb 2017, Luang Prabang, Lao PDR

ECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SALMON RESTORATION: A BROADER PERSPECTIVE

DEVELOPMENT OF A HYDRO-GEOMORPHIC MODEL FOR THE LAGUNA CREEK WATERSHED

Water planning and climate change: actionable intelligence yet?

Transcription:

General Instream Flow Methods Overview Agency Meeting on 2012 Draft Study Descriptions January 24, 2011 1

Susitna River 2

Main Channel and Side Channels 3

Sloughs and Side Channels 4

Turbidity Portage Creek Whiskers Creek Slough 9 5

Upwelling, Incubation, & Juveniles 6

Spawning 7

Spawning 8

1980s Approach for Existing Habitat BL Devils Cyn 9

Project Water Diversion Impoundment Overview of Riverine Fish Habitat Land Cover Watershed Climate Precipitation Air Temperature Solar radiation/day length Geology Soil/rock types Topography Physical/ Chemical Habitat Hydrology Frequency Duration Timing Discharge Water Quality Temperature Turbidity DO Nutrients Salinity Pollutants Channel Geomorph. Channel shape Substrate Mesohabitat types Hydraulics Depth Velocity Water Surface Distance to waters edge Riparian Vegetation Types Regeneration Large woody debris Cover & distance to cover Groundwater Surface/groundwater interaction Algae and Macroinvertebrates Drift density/size (food) Fish individual / Population / Community Growth Immigration Tolerances Reproduction Emigration Distribution Abundance/Production Cohorts / Age Structure Diversity/Species Richness Predation Competition

11

12

13

14

15

Target Species, Lifestages and/or Guilds 16

Target Species, Lifestages and/or Guilds 17

Periodicity (seasonal timing) 18

1 Observed Habitat Utilization by Target Species/lifestages/guilds Relative Suitability 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Velocity (cm/s) S 20-39 mm K 20-39 mm S DNEI 30 mm K DNEI 30 mm Relative Suitability Relative Suitability 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Velocity (cm/s) S 40-69 mm K 40-69 mm S DNEI 50 mm K DNEI 50 mm 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Velocity (cm/s) S 70-159 mm K 70-159 mm S DNEI 150 mm K DNEI 150 mm Relative Suitability 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Velocity (cm/s) S 160-400 mm K 160-400 mm S DNEI 300 mm K DNEI 300 mm 19

Important Physical Habitat Processes 20

River Stratification and Study Sites Study Area Segmentation (Channel Shape, Slope, Hydrology, Access) 21

River Stratification and Study Sites 22

Habitat Suitability Criteria 23

Suitability 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Habitat Suitability Criteria Observed Redband Spawning Velocity Frequency (N=148) Bovee Raleigh Roaring UNFFR Butt NF Kings E Sierra UARP Sm-Med Project SI UARP Lrg Project SI Stanislaus Project SI CAWG Project SI PCWA Project SI Spokane River 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 Mean Column Velocity (ft/s) 24

Habitat Suitability Criteria Observed Redband Spawning Depth Frequency (N=148) 1.0 0.8 Suitability 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Depth (ft) Bovee Raleigh Roaring UNFFR Butt NF Kings E Sierra UARP All Channels Project SI Stanislaus Project SI CAWG Project SI PCWA Project SI Spokane River 25

Barriers and Water Temperature Chinook 2011 Measured Yuba Rives Habitat Modeling (Macro) 26

Habitat Modeling (Micro) 2-dimensional hydrodynamics and habitat modeling 1-dimensional hydraulics and habitat modeling Empirical mapping of habitat over a range of flows 27

Habitat Modeling (Versus Flow) 713 cfs 1342 cfs 2500 cfs 5226 cfs 28

Habitat Modeling (Versus Flow) 29

Habitat Modeling (2D) 30

Habitat Modeling (2D) 31

Habitat Modeling (Rip. Veg. and Substrate) 32

Habitat Modeling (1D) 33

Habitat Modeling (1D) 34

Habitat Modeling (Empirical Mapping and Spatial Niche) 35

Habitat Modeling (Empirical Mapping Patchy Habitat) 36

Habitat Modeling (Empirical Mapping Patchy Habitat) 37

Habitat Modeling (Empirical Mapping Patchy Habitat) 38

Spawning / Incubation Habitat vs Flow Relationships Varied Widely by Patch Examples Habitat at high flow -- little habitat at low flow Patch not inundated at low flow Habitat at low flow -- little habitat at higher flow Too high of velocity at high flow 39

Habitat Modeling (Empirical Mapping Patchy Habitat) Spawning Habitat X 10-3 (ft 2 / 1000 ft) 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Cumulative Redband Spawning & Effective Incubation Habitat (all patches) 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 Discharge (cfs) Patch Study Results Effective Habit (13,000 cfs -> 1,000 cfs) Old 1D Cross Section 13000 cfs Spawn Discharge Total Spawning Habitat 40

Habitat Modeling (Empirical Mapping Patchy Habitat) Old 1D Cross-Section Study: Spawning Habitat Versus Flow Relationship Much Different Limited Sampling of Spawning Patches 41

Hydrology 42

Habitat Modeling (Time Series) 43

Habitat Modeling (Effective Habitat) 80 18000 Number of Redds Observed 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Apr 1-7 Apr 8-14 Apr 15-21 Apr 22-28 Apr 29 - May 5 May 6-12 May 13-19 May 20-26 May 27 - Jun 2 Number of Redds Observed Jun 3-9 Jun 10-16 Jun 17-23 Jun 24-30 Jul 1-7 Jul 8-14 Jul 15-21 Average Daily Discharge 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 Average Daily Discharge (cfs) 44

Discharge (cfs) 26000 24000 22000 20000 18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 Habitat Modeling (Effective Habitat) Spokane River at Spokane, WA (USGS Gage No.12422500) 1980-2010 0 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Median 80 % Eceedance 20% Eceedance Incubation Spawning 45

Habitat Modeling (Effective Habitat) 46

Habitat Modeling (Effective Habitat) 47

Habitat Modeling 48

Habitat Modeling Many Other Aspects Including: Channel Change / Substrate Change/ Riparian Passage into Habitats Temperature Food Growth, etc. Winter Spring Summer/Fall Key Considerations Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Mar Apr May Jun Jun Jul Aug Sep Channel/Riparian Maintenance Flow Maintain Schedule Riparian Recruitment (seed setting) Enhance Rainbow Trout Habitat Spawn Incubation Enhance Enhance Adult Maintain Enhance Maintain Juvenile Other Fish Species (brown trout) Productivity (Algae,Benthos) Maintain Maintain Enhance Recreation (angling) Enhance Hydrograph (shape) Enhance Water Temperature Maintain Enhance 49