Wind Workshop. Technical Characterization: Dependable Capacity & Firm Energy 10:00-10:30am

Similar documents
Wind Generation and Grid Operations: Experience & Perspective

California Independent System Operator Corporation. California ISO. Import resource adequacy. Department of Market Monitoring

APRIL 23, Capacity Value of Wind Assumptions and Planning Reserve Margin

Electric Forward Market Report

System Needs: An Energy Planning Perspective. Randy Reimann

2001 Annual Report on the New York Electricity Markets

2005 Integrated Electricity Plan. Resource Options Workshop #2 Planning Criteria March 09, 2005

Capacity and Flexibility Needs under Higher Renewables

NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT

CO2, SO2 and NOX Emission Rates. March 15, 2018

Wind Update. Renewable Energy Integration Lessons Learned. March 28, 2012

ERCOT Public LTRA Probabilistic Reliability Assessment. Final Report

CO2, SO2 and NOX Emission Rates. August 21, 2015

2016 ISO Flexible Capacity Needs Assessment: Study Methodology, Assumptions, and Preliminary Results

Flexible Resource Adequacy Criteria and Must-Offer Obligation

A Bulk Energy Storage Resource Case Study with 40% RPS in 2024

Solar, Wind and Market Power in the New Zealand Electricity Market (and hydro lake dynamics) Mina Bahrami Gholami and Stephen Poletti

Comparison of Installed Capacity (ICAP) & Unforced Capacity (UCAP) Capacity Value Calculation Methods. Eligibility WG Meeting #3 July 4, 2017

Pumped hydro Storage Plants

PJM Wind Integration Initiatives

Electricity Supply. Monthly Energy Grid Output by Fuel Type (MWh)

21,363 MW 22,774 MW ONTARIO ENERGY REPORT Q JULY SEPT 2014 ELECTRICITY. Electricity Highlights Third Quarter Ontario s Power Grid

PJM ENERGY PRICES 2005 Response to Howard M. Spinner Paper

The Confluence Model. Presentation to Modeling and Forecasting Working Group January 21, 2015

Schedule 2 TECHNICAL INFORMATION

Results of California s Renewable Energy Program and Agricultural Biomass to Energy Program (SB704)

Estimation of the Capacity Value for Wind Power Generation in India Wind Discussion Forum August 22, 2014 New Delhi

Section 3 Characteristics of Credits Types of units. Economic Noneconomic Generation.

Woking. q business confidence report

Resource Capability Testing

The Texas Experience: Implications of 8,000+ MW Wind Generation Resources In ERCOT. David Campbell CEO, Luminant 2009 Summer Seminar August 3, 2009

The Future of Electricity: A Market with Costs of Zero? Marginal

olumbia River Treaty The Columbia by Steve Oliver, Vice President, Generation Asset Management, Bonneville Power Administration 16 Oct

Renewable Energy in The Netherlands

Integrating Energy Efficiency and Demand Response

The Future of Electricity: A Market with Costs of Zero? Marginal

Wyoming Pipeline Authority Happy Jack Wind Farm

Final 2014 Flexible Capacity Needs Assessment

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Review of Interconnection Assistance Reliability Benefits. May 12, NPCC CP-5 Working Group

Flexible Resource Adequacy Criteria and Must Offer Obligation Working Group Meeting

Energy from the Earth. Geothermal Two very different methods Tides, waves, currents. Unit 12 Energy from the earth - Slide 1

Stephen Batstone THE NZ ELECTRICITY MARKET: TEETERING ON THE EDGE OF TRANSFORMATION?

For Bandon Utilities Commission

Final Flexible Capacity Needs Assessment for 2019

California ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. February 10, Prepared by: Department of Market Monitoring

Solving Climate: The Need for Zero Carbon On-Demand Power

Ten Years After Gas & Power in Perspective

Leading Insights into Solar

Modernizing the Electricity Grid MILESTONES

DRAFT Version 1.2 of Installed Capacity Manual Attachment D For Discussion at Installed Capacity WG Meeting on January 27, 2005

RPM 301 Performance in Reliability Pricing Model

Final Flexible Capacity Needs Assessment for 2016

August 22, 2014 FIRE ISLAND WIND

Risk Evaluation of Meridian Substation Transformers

Draft Application for New License for Major Water Power Project Existing Dam

This appendix summarizes the data that was provided to GE for use in this project.

Assessing the Flexible Capacity Requirements for 2018 through 2020

University of Michigan Eco-Driving Index (EDI) Latest data: August 2017

BC Hydro Generation system operation Columbia Basin Regional Advisory Committee

PORTFOLIO OPTIMIZATION MODEL FOR ELECTRICITY PURCHASE IN LIBERALIZED ENERGY MARKETS

BRITISH INSTITUTE OF ENERGY ECONOMICS. RENEWABLES AND CCGTS: COMPETITORS OR COMPLEMENTARY? 11 October 2012 Andrew Morris

California ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. July 10, Prepared by: Department of Market Monitoring

The Seventh Power Plan The Proposed Mix of Generation Resources and Strategies for the Region

ISO-New England s Generating Unit Availability Study: Where s the Beef?

Operations Report. Stephanie Monzon Manager, Markets Coordination Operating Committee July 10, PJM 2018

Outline of Talk. Dynamic vs. Time-of-use pricing. Dynamic vs. Time-of-use pricing

Operations Report. Hong Chen Senior Lead Engineer, Markets Coordination Members Committee October 22, PJM 2018

ANNUAL REPORT ON MARKET ISSUES & PERFORMANCE

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Data Viewer, Member Voting, Account Manager, DR Hub, Power Meter, and Data Miner Roadmaps

California ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. November 1, Department of Market Monitoring

ERSTF Loads and Resources Balance

Hiroux, Céline ADIS/GRJM Université Paris XI Roques, Fabien - CERA Saguan, Marcelo RSCAS-EUI Mestre, Olivier MeteoFrance Libonetti, Sebastian - GRJM

Operations Report. Stephanie Monzon Manager, Markets Coordination MC Webinar January 22, PJM 2018

FLEXIBILITY HOW TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE STABILITY OF THE GRID THANKS TO THE FLEXIBILITY OF YOUR PRODUCTION PROCESSES?

TOTAL GENERATION WHOLESALE SALES

Potential Impact of Biomass Burning on Urban Air Quality: Case-study of Chiang Mai

Solar Power Realities

Keeyask Generation Project. Public Involvement. Supporting Volume. Environmental Impact Statement

Analysis of Wind Speed Data in East of Libya

INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN

Eugene Water & Electric Board. The Future of Utilities in the Pacific Northwest

March 5, SUBJECT: Additional Background Materials for Scenario Input Assumptions

ISO New England Inc. February /19 ICR Related Values 1

Winter Peak Load calculation maintenance outages and future WPL addbacks. DRS Meeting December 8th, 2017

Data Viewer, Member Voting, Account Manager, DR Hub, Power Meter, and Data Miner Roadmaps

April 30, 2013 MEMORANDUM. Council Members. Gillian Charles, Power Planning Division. Update on the Region s Wind Development

UCAP Calculation Comparison

TransCanada Power Market Update February 2018

Capacity Performance Training. March 16, 2015

Approved by the RCC November 27, Review of Interconnection Assistance Reliability Benefits. November 6, NPCC CP-8 Working Group

Final Flexible Capacity Needs Assessment for 2018

ENERGY AND WATER STATISTICS 2017

Project Risk Management Bootcamp. Contents are subject to change. For the latest updates visit

Virtual Workshop on PJM ARR and FTR Market 2017/2018

Analyst Presentation Managing Hydrology Risk

Analysis of Solar Capacity Equivalent Values for the South Carolina Electric and Gas System

ENERGY AND WATER STATISTICS 2016

Capacity Performance Training. June 24, 2015

Transcription:

Wind Workshop Technical Characterization: Dependable Capacity & Firm Energy 10:00-10:30am

Objective of this session: Understand BC Hydro s definitions and calculation methodology of dependable capacity Understand other definitions and calculation methodologies Formulate new approach?

Agenda Dependable Capacity Other jurisdictions (PJM,CallSO, NYISO) BC Hydro definition and methodology Geographic Smoothing Firm Energy Other jurisdictions (CallSO, NYISO) BC Hydro definition and methodology Monthly energy profile and coincident peak

Capacity Credit PJM From PJM News Release April 24, 2003: -Based on a wind farms actual performance -Calculated as three-year rolling average of a units output during Peak hours(3 pm and 6 pm) during June, July, August -Class average is 20%

Capacity Credit California From Study of Renewables Integration Costs for California s RPS (Phase 1) Based on California ISO Plant Information for wind farms in Altamont, San Gorgonio and Tehachapi Calculated as the Effective Load Carrying Capacity (ELCC) of wind farms Wind in the Altamont area contributed ELCC of 26%, San Gorgonio 24% and Tehachapi 22% The California class average is 24%

Capacity Credit New York From NYISO/NYSERDA Wind Study Unforced Capacity (UCAP) of wind farms when load exceeds 90% of peak load was used to estimate the ELCC This modified UCAP ranged between 3% and 23% The modified UCAP was low because New York wind farms have low outputs during summer evenings, which are the highest load times in the area

Capacity Credit PacificCorp Effective Load Carrying Capability - amount of load that can be supported by a wind unit while holding some risk measure constant (Energy not served) - for 100 MW Wind unit, contribution to load ranged from 19-24.5% - suggested using 20% contribution to load (study based on limited data)

Capacity Credit Colorado Colorado PUC s decision regarding Xcel Energy - wind farm provides ~30% equivalent European Wide study by Giebel - suggests ~19% equivalent

BC Hydro Definition - Dependable Capacity A generating plants dependable capacity is the maximum megawatt output it can reliably produce when required, assuming all units are in service Reliably Produce: means availability coincident with system peak with high confidence level

BC Hydro Definition - Dependable Capacity Dependable Capacity is affected by factors external to the plant I.e. streamflow conditions; fuel supply constraints; wind Not affected by: Forced outages not included - in planning reserves Planned outages not included - assumed to be scheduled around winter peak

BC Hydro Definition - Dependable Capacity For annual supply-demand balance: 3 hours in peak load period of weekday during the continuous two weeks of cold weather Pragmatic definition for calculation capacity available during 2 consecutive months of low flow/fuel supply for the period of concern (i.e. 3 hours) based on 85% confidence level.

Dependable Capacity - calculation methodology Major Generating Plants with upstream storage: - 85% confidence level of assumed 50 years stream flows Existing IPP projects: - based on actual performance (85% confidence level ) Planned IPP projects: - based on their contracted capacity Projects in Resource Options Database: - some projects have site specific information available (Site C, Rev5), others base on class average Dependable Capacity Factors

BC Hydro Methodology for Wind Dependable Capacity Factor = dependable capacity/installed capacity class average percent Used data (Dec & Jan) from BC Hydro monitoring sites Moving minimum across 3-hour intervals (using average hourly data) Determine wind speed that is exceeded 85% of the time Use turbine power curve to determine the power Fraction of this value compared to nameplate capacity is DCF

DCF Results for BC Hydro Sites Average 85 % confidence Mt Hays 0.00 Mt Wartenbe 0.00 Aasen 0.00 Bear Mountain 0.00 Sugar Loaf 0.55 Ashcroft South 0.00 Rumble Ridge 0.05

Capacity Summary Capacity Equivalent other utilities 0 to 30% California 24% New York 3% to 23% PacifiCorp 20% Xcel 30% Dependable Capacity BC Hydro sites 0 to 55% Class Average 0%

Capacity Credit Vancouver Island From BC Hydro Rumble Ridge Meteorological Tower and BC Hydro Load Profile The ELCC of wind farms can be accurately calculated with an Expected Energy not Served (EENS) study Otherwise, the ELCC can be estimated using the modified (UCAP) methodology of the NYISO Study A Rumble Ridge farm with an annual capacity factor of 30% has a 40% capacity factor at times of peak loads The modified UCAP is high because Vancouver Island winds are strongest during winter, when BC loads peak

Wind Hydro Correlation 100 90 Percent of Peak 80 70 60 50 40 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May B.C. Reservoir Storage Wind Speed at Port Hardy Peak Load on Vancouver Island

BC Hydro Methodology for Wind Using the BC Hydro methodology for wind dependable capacity and Sea Breeze data The dependable capacity of a typical wind farm on Vancouver Island is 3% The dependable capacity of wind farms in a small region of Vancouver Island is 14% The dependable capacity of wind farms over the entire island would be greater still With PJM or NYISO methodology, the capacity credit would be 40%

Geographic Smoothing Concept instead of evaluating Dependable Capacity of an individual site, consider for a number of sites Journal of Geophysical Research (May 2003) - power output average over 1, 3, 8 stations - Intermittency of wind energy from multiple wind farms less than from a single farm. Example using BCH data: Rumble Ridge (VI), Mt Hays (Prince Rupert),and Bear Mountain (Peace)

BC Hydro Definition - Energy Capability Average energy - expected annual energy for hydro is based on average water conditions average energy for dispatchable thermals incorporates economic dispatch Small hydro, wind, wave etc.: Currently not enough information to discern firm & average in portfolios Firm energy - what a project can generate annually on an assured basis based on historic low water for BC Hydro projects for thermals - based on installed capacity, fuel supply & unit availability

Firm Energy other jurisdictions -Only an issue for Hydro systems that are energy constrained. Thermal systems are capacity constrained so do not usually consider firm energy. -BPA : Firm energy based on critical water years -North West Planning Council recently introduced standard to plan for energy based on 85% quantile.

Energy Capability of Wind Annual wind farm output has a standard deviation of about 7% 93% of the average annual output is exceeded by 85% of years Since wind has low annual variation, it can serve as energy insurance for the critical water years in the BC Hydro system

Monthly Energy Profile and load 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% Peace Van Island Load 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec % of Annual Energy

Monthly Energy Profile and load 120% Peace Van Island Load 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec % of of max month

Summary of Discussion: Dependable Capacity Firm Energy