Joint Evaluation on Joint Programmes on Gender Equality in the UN System

Similar documents
Joint Evaluation of Joint Programmes on Gender Equality in the United Nations System Synthesis Report

Joint Evaluation of Joint Programmes on Gender Equality in the United Nations System Management Response

Joint Evaluation of Joint Programmes on Gender Equality

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme and of the United Nations Population Fund

Joint Meeting of the Executive Boards of UNDP/UNFPA/UNOPS, UNICEF, UN-Women and WFP 4 February 2013 New York

Terms of Reference (TOR) Evaluation of UN Volunteers intervention ( ) in the Tonle Sap Conservation Project

V High Level Intergovernmental Conference on Delivering as One. Tirana Conference June 2012, Tirana, Albania.

UNICEF Evaluation Management Response 1

UNICEF Evaluation Management Response

UNV s Experience in Strengthening Volunteer Infrastructure in TOGO

Establishment of a New Composite Entity for Gender Equality and Women s Empowerment: Key Messages, Background and Current Status

UNV s Experience in Strengthening Volunteer Infrastructure

UNEG Strategy

UN Delivering as One and UN support to implementation of the 2030 Agenda

Terms of Reference. Projects Outputs Evaluation

Terms of Reference for the Outcome Evaluation of Achieving the MDGs and Reducing Human Poverty Programme

National Evaluation Capacity in UNICEF

SDG Alliance 8.7. Joining forces globally to end forced labour, modern slavery, human trafficking and child labour

UNDAF MID-TERM REVIEW. TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANT (Team Leader)

Building on the recently adopted CEB Common Principles, the 2030 Agenda requires the UN Development System (UNDS) to:

Terms of Reference (ToR)

ECOSOC Dialogue on the longer-term positioning of the UN development system in the context of the post-2015 development agenda

JOINT EVALUATION OF JOINT PROGRAMMES ON GENDER EQUALITY IN THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM

UNFPA Strategic Plan Organizational effectiveness and efficiency Results framework

Management response to the evaluation of UNDP contribution to environmental management for poverty reduction: the povertyenvironment

Terms of Reference. Corporate Evaluation of UN-Women contribution to United Nations system coordination on gender equality and women s empowerment

Joint Meeting of the Executive Boards of UNDP/UNFPA/UNOPS, UNICEF, UN-Women and WFP 2 February 2015 New York

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME TERMS OF REFERENCE

Terms of Reference (ToR) End-of-the Programme Evaluation UNDP Support to Inclusive Participation in Governance May 2013

Terms of Reference (ToR) End-of-the Project Evaluation UNDP Support to the Strategic Capacity Building Initiative

Terms of Reference Mid Term Review (MTR) UNDP Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP )

CONSULTANT: Revision of Joint Programmes Guidelines

Inter-Agency Working Group on Evaluation Report of the Meeting 2-3 April 2001 Palais des Nations, Geneva, Switzerland

IMPLEMENTING UNCT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR GENDER EQUALITY AND THE EMPOWERMENT OF WOMEN (GENDER SCORECARDS)

INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE / TERMS OF REFERENCE Description of the assignment: Final Evaluation National Consultant

Progress Update to the Executive Board on Change Management (26, January) Comprehensive Resource Review

ECOSOC Dialogue The longer-term positioning of the United Nations development system. Session I ECOSOC Chamber, 15 December a.m. 6 p.m.

Deliverables, added value and limitations of the PDNA

Joint Evaluation of Joint Programmes on Gender Equality in the United Nations System

Joint Evaluation of Joint Programmes on Gender Equality in the United Nations System

Review of Guidance note on integrating Food and Nutrition Security into Country Analysis and UNDAF

Vacancy Announcement 062/UNDP HR/2018

Final Inception Report Joint Evaluation of Joint Gender Programmes in the UN System

DEMAC Diaspora Emergency Action & Coordination

Annex I Summary of reports and notes issued by the Joint Inspection Unit in 2016

Global Event: Dialogue on implementation of the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Participatory monitoring for accountability

UNDP-Spain MDG Achievement Fund. Terms of Reference for Thematic Window on Environment and Climate Change

Executive Board of the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women

PARTNERSHIP FOR MATERNAL, NEWBORN & CHILD HEALTH DRAFT 2015 Workplan and Budget

Terms of Reference Outcome Evaluation: Good Governance for Sustainable Development

DECENT JOBS FOR YOUTH

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Location

Botswana: Piloting the Middle Income Strategy

Final draft for final comments - 13 November 2015 VIENTIANE DECLARATION ON PARTNERSHIP FOR EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION ( )

Making the choice: Decentralized Evaluation or Review? (Orientation note) Draft for comments

United Nations Evaluation Group. Strategy

Terms of Reference (TOR)

OCHA s Management Response Plan (MRP) to Evaluation of the Common Humanitarian Fund Country Report: South Sudan

Stocktaking "Delivering as One in Uruguay 2008

Sida Terms of reference/ 1 (9) Requirements specification

TERM OF REFERENCE. Formative Evaluation of Monitoring Results for Equity System (MoRES) Approach

Evaluation of UNICEF Strategies and Programmes to Reduce Stunting in Children under 5 years of age

Proposals for a new Template for Habitat Country Programme Documents

Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services

Results-Based Management in the United Nations Development System

13 th Steering Committee Meeting of the Global Partnership. Summary

The 2018 evaluation policy of UNICEF. George Laryea-Adjei Informa Briefing of the UNICEF Executive Board 22 May 2018

EvalAgenda Global Evaluation Agenda Developed by a global, multi-stakeholder consultative process

UNICEF Evaluation Office Terms of Reference: External Assessment of UNICEF s Global Evaluation Reports Oversight System (GEROS)

Terms of Reference for a Terminal Evaluation of UNDP-Uganda Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP): ( /15)

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME JOB DESCRIPTION

THE EVALUATION OF UNDP S CONTRIBUTION AT THE COUNTRY LEVEL UNDP Evaluation Office, January 2009

Terms of Reference for Consultant to Facilitate UNCT SWAP Gender Equality SCORECARD assessment in Lebanon

Evaluation Strategy Evaluation Office

Terms of Reference (TOR)

IAS EVALUATION POLICY

TOR 1 for UNDAF CD Evaluation

UNICEF Strategic Plan, Advancing the rights of every child, especially the most disadvantaged

EIF Regional Workshop Bangkok, Thailand, November 8, By Sven Callebaut, Adviser, Aid-for-Trade

UNESCO CREATIVE CITIES NETWORK (UCCN) BUILDING A COLLECTIVE VISION FOR THE FUTURE STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

Location: Thailand, Bangkok, Samut Prakan, Trat. Job Title: Country Director and Project Manager. Starting date: 8th of January 2018

Evaluation of Partners for Prevention Regional Joint Programme

Technical Note Integrating Gender in WFP Evaluations

JOB DESCRIPTION. 1. Organizational Location

High-Level Workshop on the New Way of Working March 2017, Copenhagen. Action Areas

Terms of Reference: Outcome/Project Evaluation: Women s Empowerment, Gender Equality and Equity

Strategic Plans of UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and UN Women. Joint Informal Briefing Executive Boards 27 April 2017

Terms of Reference (TOR)

UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FRAMEWORK (UNDAF) END OF PROGRAMME EVALUATION

UNFPA. Policies & Procedure Manual South-South Cooperation Strategy UNFPA SOUTH_SOUTH COOPERATION STRATEGY

JOB PROFLE NO.: CCOG CODE: FUNCTIONAL CODE: PC/P-3 JOB CLASSIFICATION 20075

PRE-QUALIFICATION PROCESS FOR ROSTER OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS IN THE FIELD OF RULE OF LAW, JUSTICE AND SECURITY

VACANCIES. In furtherance of UNFPA mandate in Ghana, the following personnel are needed to strengthen its operations:

Social Economy and the Roma community challenges and opportunities Situation Analysis Report CONCEPT NOTE POSDRU/69/6.1/S/34922

Organisational strategy

UNEG Evaluation of the Pilot Initiative for Delivering as One Evaluability Assessment Report on Mozambique

High-Level Workshop on the New Way of Working Advancing Implementation March 2017, Copenhagen. Action Areas

[AREA BASED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME /JOINT PROGRAMME] FINAL PROGRAMME 1 NARRATIVE REPORT

Comprehensive contribution:

Suriname. Terms of Reference UNDAF Mid Term Review Consultant. Consultant, UNDAF Mid Term Review

Transcription:

in partnership with Joint Evaluation on Joint Programmes on Gender Equality in the UN System UNEG EPE Session 4: Joint Evaluations 31 March 2014 Bangkok, Thailand Isabel Suarez Evaluation Specialist, UN Women Evaluation Office Member of the Evaluation Management Group

Evaluation Purpose and Use Commissioned to address a gap in evaluative evidence on country-level JGPs Unit of analysis is country level JGPs in the UN system; across a range of thematic areas and/ implemented 2006-2010 and with budget over US$100,000 Managed by UN Women, UNDP, UNICEF, UNFPA, the MDG-Fund and Governments of Norway and Spain Conducted: May 2012 November 2013 Primary users are UN agencies, UNDG, donor/partner countries, civil society, particularly women s advocacy groups or gender related networks

Evaluation Objectives The evaluation objectives were to assess: overall contribution of JGPs to national development results on gender equality, including intended and unintended results and efficiency in achieving their objectives; The extent to which JGP s objectives and results are relevant to national and UN development goals and policies; The overall sustainability of JGP s results, including the level of national ownership, national capacity development, and partnerships between the UN system and national partners; The extent to which JGP have created synergies between and among UN agencies and partners at national level; The overall level of integration of human rights based approaches.

Evaluation Governance Conducted by an external independent evaluation team Evaluation Management Group Evaluation Steering Committee Evaluation Reference Group National Evaluation Reference Groups

Evaluation Methodology In- depth desk review/interviews of a sample of 24 JGPs (out of 80) and web-based survey Field study of 5 JGPs : Albania, Kenya, Liberia, Nicaragua, State of Palestine; deepened analysis/interviews in Nepal Over 150 interviews with UN staff, donors, and national partners (governments and CSOs) at HQ and country level Main limitations were limited information on results and availability of data for comparative analysis

Findings Relevance Ownership and accountability; Coherence, synergies and efficiencies; Sustainable results; Added value

Lessons learned DaO environments, where appropriately leveraged, can provide a conducive setting for JGPs Successful implementation and the delivery of results within JGPs is strongly connected to a robust analytical basis A detailed and inclusive design process is the cornerstone for operational coherence Ownership and sustainability are not maximized where accountability is not grounded within the national context Realism is essential when seeking coordination and coherence across individual UN agencies with their own diverse systems and ways of operating;

Recommendations To UN agencies: Ensure a clear strategic rationale for JGPs - and firmly ground designs in development effectiveness efforts at country level To host governments and citizens: Ensure full ownership of, and accountability for, JGPs, as part of wider strategising and capacity development for gender To donors: Accompany demands for rigour and results in JGPs with supportive guidance and a partnership-oriented approach To the UN Development Group: Provide more specific guidance on JGPs whilst advocating for systemic change

in conclusion some positive findings Commonly demonstrated relevance and alignment with normative frameworks and national needs Recognized the importance of ownership and successfully featured strategies for its facilitation JGPs have achieved normative and corresponding operational results Strategies for sustainability have been put in place Added value of JGPs as a development cooperation modality for the UN at country-level demonstrated Valuable lessons and promising practices to improve the next generation of JGPs

with areas of improvement Design process (analysis and inclusion) Coherence and efficiency Ownership and accountability

Moving forward JGPs remain an accepted and integral part of the development cooperation landscape. There are potentially actionable steps which all JGPs should take if their potential is to be realized for contributing to transformational change and results on gender equality

Thank you very much for your attention