City of Palo Alto (ID # 7817) City Council Staff Report

Similar documents
CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR SUBJECT: INITIATED BY:

OVERVIEW OF DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE & VIDEO COMPETITION ACT OF 2006 (DIVCA)

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6096) City Council Staff Report

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY, STATE

City Council Agenda June 21, Date: June 12, Mayor and City Council. Michael Chandler, Assistant to the City Manager

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report. February 18, 2015 Council Meeting. Honorable Mayor Chu and Members of the City Council

SENATE ECONOMIC GROWTH COMMITTEE STATEMENT TO SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR. SENATE, No with committee amendments STATE OF NEW JERSEY

ORDINANCE NO. IT IS ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Carlos as follows:

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY ADDING CHAPTER ESTABLISHING A GREEN BUILDING PROGRAM FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

AGENDA March 26, :30 P.M. City Council Chambers

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANTECA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Government Code Section (j)(3) defines small residential rooftop solar energy systems; and

Ordinance Fact Sheet

ORDINANCE NO Section 2. Findings. The Board of County Commissioners relies upon the following findings in the adoption of this Ordinance:

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT. Meeting Date: March 5, 2019 Item Number: C 2 To: From:

WHEREAS, existing Chapter of the Truckee Municipal Code is not necessary and can be repealed;

ORDINANCE NO. (N.C.S.)

LIMITED USE TELECOMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE AGREEMENT

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1301

ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO DELEGATE THE OVERALL MANAGEMENT OF THE ANIMAL SERVICES PROGRAM TO THE MARIN GENERAL SERVICES AUTHORITY

ORDINANCE NO. C.S. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING GROUNDWATER RESOURCES WITHIN THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT

City of Los Angeles California

ORDINANCE NO. 809 BY DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the City of Poway supports the full participation of all citizens in electing members of the City Council;

a. i. ii. b. i. ii. iii. iv. c. i. ii. iii. d. e. i. ii. iii. iv. f. g. h. i. ii.

January 17, 2017 City Council Staff Report Green Building Ordinance

PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO COMMISSION POLICY 22 AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION POLICY

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the manufacture and distribution of single use carryout bags requires utilization of finite natural resources; and

Town of Lebanon. 15 Upper Guinea Rd. (207) Maine Uniform Building and Energy Code Administrative Ordinance - Town of Lebanon, Maine

ORDINANCE NO. TSD-67. Triunfo Sanitation District/Oak Park Water Service. Water Conservation Ordinance

CITY OF LARKSPUR Staff Report

Emeryville's Seismic Hazard Mitigation Ordinance

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

LJ Approved Recommendation 0 Info/Consent. o Ord. No(s). o Report ORes. No(s). X Public Hearing. o Other 0 Other

Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE AMENDING CHAPTER 24, ENTITLED ZONING, TO PROHIBIT THE STORAGE OR DISPOSAL OF

ORDINANCE NO U

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS MODEL ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO.

Introduced by Councilmember AN ORDINANCE

Attachment 1. Ordinance

ALISO VIEJO CALIFORNIA ENACTED PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura ( County ), State of California, ordains as follows:

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

City of Signal Hill Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Revising Freestanding Solar Energy Systems Permit Requirements

CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS MODEL ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO AMENDING CHAPTER 6.49 TO THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE TO REDUCE SINGLE-USE PLASTIC AND PAPER CARRY OUT BAGS

The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside ordains as follows:

Marin Telecommunications Agency Revised Strategic Plan

City of Aliso Viejo CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM

EXHIBIT LRP: :B ORDINANCE NO.

Ordinance No. THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4162

STATE OF NEW JERSEY Board of Public Utilities Two Gateway Center, Suite 801 Newark, NJ

WHEREAS, littering single-use bags can result in blocked storm drains, fouled waterways, and increased marine debris; and

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, millions of plastic single use carryout bags are distributed by retailers in the City of Soledad each year; and

ORDINANCE NO. IT IS ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Carlos as follows:

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

(a) Every municipality has the power and is authorized to:

RESOLUTION NO SERIES 2013


ORDINANCE NO PASSED:OCTOBER 5, 1993 (AMENDED BY ORDINANCE #3718)

BEFORE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 330 WEST 20 TH AVENUE

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

City of Palo Alto (ID # 10026) City Council Staff Report

broadly empowers the City to plan for and regulate the use of land in order to provide for orderly

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL Cherry Avenue Signal Hill, CA

CHAPTER 37 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ARTICLE I INTERESTED PARTIES REGISTRY REGISTRATION RULES

TRANSIT REVITALIZATION INVESTMENT DISTRICT ACT - OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS Act of Nov. 4, 2016, P.L., No. 151 Cl. 74 Session of 2016 No.

WHEREAS, the Authority is in the process of amending the Authority JP A to formally change its name to the Golden State Finance Authority; and

ORDINANCE NO. 80. WHEREAS: The Program provides for regular inspections of Cross-Connections and Backflow Preventer devices; and

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE COASTSIDE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NO , Series of 2018

Rules and Regulations For the Implementation of The California Environmental Quality Act

ARTICLE 38: AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND VENTILATION REQUIREMENT FOR URBAN INFILL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS

ORDINANCE NO. 92. WHEREAS, the District produces Title 22 Unrestricted recycled water for customers to use in accordance with state law; and

NORTH EAST TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO.2013-

ADOPTION OF CHAPTER 120 (TREE CONSERVATION ORDINANCE) OF THE 1976 CODE OF THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA

2011, in which the City announced its intention to strive to implement zero waste strategies; and

City of Los Alamitos

Agenda Item No. 8c July 8, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

BE IT ORDAINED by the Borough Council of the Borough of Mountain Lakes, in the County of Morris and State of New Jersey, as follows:

RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY. Policy Subject: Number Page SOLAR POWER PLANTS B-29 1 of 7

City of Calistoga Staff Report

TOWNSHIP OF WANTAGE ORDINANCE #

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADDING ARTICLE 5 TO CHAPTER 6 OF DIVISION

WHEREAS many employers choose to employ workers on a part-time basis to avoid providing health insurance and other important job-related benefits; and

CITY OF SAN JOSE" CALIFORNIA

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY SECTION 3 LINE EXTENSION POLICY AND CONSTRUCTION CHARGES

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SUBMISSION March 28, 2017

ORDINANCE NO C.S.

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND 2013 Legislative Session

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CORPORATE SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING ON JANUARY 9, 2018

(4 November 2016 to date) ELECTRICITY REGULATION ACT 4 OF 2006

City Council Agenda Report Meeting Date: 5/6/14

Agenda Date: 2/24/16 Agenda Item: lila CABLE TELEVISION

AGENDA BILL ~ L4 ~3~)

ORDINANCE NO

Transcription:

City of Palo Alto (ID # 7817) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 4/17/2017 Summary Title: Adoption of Ordinance Reauthorizing Public, Education, and Government Access Fees Title: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.11 of Title 2 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Reauthorize Public, Education, and Government Access Fees That Will Apply to AT&T as it Provides Service Under its State Video Franchise From: City Manager Lead Department: IT Department Recommendation Staff recommends that the Council adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 2.11 of Title 2 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to reauthorize a fee to support Public, Education, and Government (PEG) Access that will apply to AT&T as it provides service under its State Video Franchise. Executive Summary In 2008, the Council adopted an ordinance establishing a PEG fee of $0.88 per residential subscriber per month. The City is required to reauthorize this fee by ordinance at the expiration and renewal of each state video franchise. AT&T has notified the City that it plans to renew its state-issued franchise that expires on March 30, 2017. The proposed ordinance provides for the continued payment of a PEG fee by AT&T. Background In 1983, the cities of Palo Alto, Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, the Town of Atherton and portions of San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JPA) for purposes of obtaining cable television service for residents, businesses and institutions within these jurisdictions. The JPA gives the City of Palo Alto the sole authority to grant and administer the cable franchise process on behalf of its members. The JPA members continue to rely on Palo Alto for such activities as franchise and PEG fee collection, PEG oversight, customer service and the like with respect to all state franchise holders. The Digital Infrastructure and Video Competition Act of 2006 (DIVCA) went into effect on January 1, 2007. DIVCA established a state franchising system administered by the Public Utilities Commission for video service providers. DIVCA allows the City to exact a fee from City of Palo Alto Page 1

video service providers with state-issued franchises for Public, Education, and Governmental channel purposes. In 2008, the Council adopted an ordinance, amending Chapter 2.11 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code, to establish a PEG fee of $0.88 per residential subscriber per month. At the time, the City had the option of selecting its existing PEG fee of $0.88 per subscriber or establishing a fee of 1 percent of the video service provider s gross video service revenues. The City adopted the $0.88 PEG fee because it yielded 30 percent more than the 1 percent fee. DIVCA requires the City to reauthorize the $0.88 PEG fee by ordinance at the expiration and renewal of each state video franchise. The term of a state franchise is 10 years. Discussion AT&T s State Video Franchise expires on March 30, 2017. AT&T has notified the City that is plans to renew its Franchise. Staff is proposing that the City adopt an ordinance reauthorizing a PEG support fee of $0.88 per residential subscriber per month that will apply to AT&T under its renewed State Video Franchise. Palo Alto has designated the Media Center, as its Community Access Organization, to operate and manage its PEG channels and to promote PEG access. The City forwards the PEG fees it receives from AT&T and Comcast (amounting to $329,813 in 2016) directly to the Media Center. Federal law restricts the use of PEG fees to capital expenditures. On May 10, 2016, following a review of the Cable Franchise and PEG Fee Audit, the Policy & Services Committee directed staff to work with the Media Center to ensure the PEG fee program complies with federal Cable Act provisions. The Media Center is now placing PEG fees in a restricted account that can only be used for capital expenditures. Staff plans to update Council on its work with the Media Center in the mid-2017. Prior to the expiration of the Comcast State Franchise on January 2, 2018, the City will once again return to Council to reauthorize its PEG fee by ordinance. Resource Impact In 2016, the JPA received PEG fees from AT&T in the amount of $39,486. In 2016, PEG fees from both AT&T and Comcast amounted to $329,813. The proposed ordinance provides for the continued payment of AT&T PEG fees. Attachments: PEG fees reauth 2.11.070 ORD City of Palo Alto Page 2

NOT YET APPROVED 170215 th 0140177 Ordinance No. Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Amending Chapter 2.11 of Title 2 of the Palo Alto Municipal Code to Add Section 2.11.070 Public, Education and Government Access Channel Capacity and Support The Council of the City of Palo Alto does ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations. The City Council finds and declares as follows: Palo Alto requires holders of State Video Franchises to pay a fee of $0.88 per residential subscriber per month to support Public, Education, and Government (PEG) Access. The City is required to reauthorize this fee by ordinance at expiration and renewal of each state video franchise. AT&T has notified the City that its state-issued franchise expires on March 30, 2017 and will be renewed thereafter. Accordingly, the City reauthorizes the support fee for PEG access according to the existing terms. SECTION 2. Section 2.11.070 (Public, education and government access channel capacity and support) of Chapter 2.11 (Video Service Providers- Applicable Requirements) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.11.070 Public, education and government access channel capacity and support. (a) PEG Channel Capacity. (1) A state franchisee shall designate and activate seven PEG channels on its network. The state franchisee shall designate and activate the seven PEG channels within three months from the date that the state franchisee receives a state franchise to provide video service in an area including the city, provided, however, that this three-month period shall be tolled for such a period, and only for such a period, during which the state franchisee's ability to designate or provide such PEG capacity is technically infeasible, as provided in Section 5870(a) of the California Public Utilities Code. (2) A state franchisee shall provide an additional PEG channel when the standards set forth in Section 5870(d) of the California Public Utilities Code are satisfied by the city or any entity designated by the city to be responsible for PEG access channel capacity and support. (b) PEG Support. (1) Amount of PEG Support Fee.

(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), every state franchisee operating within the jurisdictional boundaries of the city shall pay a PEG support fee to the city in the amount of eighty-eight cents ($0.88) per month per subscriber within the jurisdictional boundaries of the city. (B) Upon the expiration of the Comcast Franchise or its earlier termination pursuant to Section 5840(o)(3) of the California Public Utility Code, every state franchisee operating within the jurisdictional boundaries of the city shall pay a new PEG support fee to the city in the amount of eighty-eight cents ($.88) per month per subscriber in the city. (C) The PEG support fee established by the city pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(b) shall expire with respect to a particular state franchisee upon the expiration of that state franchisee's state franchise, and the city shall, by ordinance, reauthorize the PEG support fee for that state franchisee upon such expiration. (2) The PEG support fee shall be used by the city for PEG purposes consistent with state and federal law. (3) A state franchisee shall remit the PEG support fee to the city quarterly, within forty-five days after the end of each calendar quarter. Each payment shall be accompanied by a summary explaining the basis for the calculation of the PEG support fee. (4) If a state franchisee fails to pay the PEG support fee when due, or underpays the proper amount due, the state franchisee shall pay a late payment charge at an annual interest rate equal to the highest prime lending rate during the period of delinquency, plus one percent or the highest rate allowed by California law, whichever is lower. (c) PEG Carriage and Interconnection. (1) State franchisees shall ensure that all PEG channels are receivable by all subscribers, whether they receive digital or analog service, or a combination thereof, without the need for any equipment other than that needed to receive the lowest cost tier of service. PEG access capacity provided by a state franchisee shall be of similar quality and functionality to that offered by commercial channels on the state franchisee's lowest cost tier of service unless the PEG signal is provided to the state franchisee at a lower quality or with less functionality. (2) If a state franchisee and an incumbent cable operator cannot reach a mutually acceptable interconnection agreement for PEG carriage, the city shall require the incumbent cable operator to allow the state franchisee to interconnect its network with the incumbent cable operator's network at a technically feasible point on the state franchisee's network as identified by the state franchisee. If no technically feasible point of interconnection 170215 th 0140177 2

is available, the state franchisee shall make interconnection available to the PEG channel originator and shall provide the facilities necessary for the interconnection. The cost of any interconnection shall be borne by the state franchisee requesting the interconnection unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. (d) Institutional Network and Other In-Kind PEG Facilities and Cable Service Support Obligations. The incumbent cable operator's obligation to provide and support PEG channel facilities and institutional networks and to provide free cable service to schools and other public buildings as provided in the Comcast Franchise shall continue until July 25, 2010. (e) PEG support fee reauthorizations. (1) On expiration and renewal of AT&T s state franchise on March 30, 2017, the city hereby reauthorizes the PEG support fee. SECTION 3. Severability. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this ordinance, or the application to any person or circumstances, shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first date after the date of its adoption. SECTION 5. CEQA. The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not a project within the meaning of section 15378 of the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA ) because it has no potential for resulting in physical change in the environment, either directly or ultimately. In the event that this Ordinance is found to be a project under CEQA, it is subject to the CEQA exemption contained in CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) because it 170215 th 0140177 3

can be seen with certainty to have no possibility of a significant effect on the environment in that this Ordinance simply clarifies existing local regulations. INTRODUCED: PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSTENTIONS: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney APPROVED: Mayor City Manager Director of Information Technology Director of Administrative Services 170215 th 0140177 4