II. NEG THIN FILM DEPOSITION

Similar documents
Non-Evaporable Getter Coating for UHV/XHV Applications

AC Reactive Sputtering with Inverted Cylindrical Magnetrons

Optimization of the Sputtering Process for Depositing Composite Thin Films

Previous Lecture. Vacuum & Plasma systems for. Dry etching

Vacuum properties of TiZrV non-evaporable getter films

ECE 541/ME 541 Microelectronic Fabrication Techniques

EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEM FOR VACUUM COATING METALLIZING, SPUTTERING, PLASMA and PECVD. Hybrid system KOLZER DGK 36

Graphite Sublimation Tests for the Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Target Development Program. J. R. Haines and C. C. Tsai

VERSATILE DEVICE FOR IN-SITU MULTIPLE COATINGS OF LONG, SMALL DIAMETER TUBES Ady Hershcovitch 1, Michael Blaskiewicz 1, J. Michael Brennan 1, Art

Plasma Quest Limited

A. Hershcovitch, M. Blaskiewicz, J.M. Brennan, W. Fischer, C-J Liaw, W. Meng, R. Todd Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, U.S.A A.

A Basic Introduction to Thin-Film Coatings. From the Experts at VaporTech

Thin Films: Sputtering Systems (Jaeger Ch 6 & Ruska Ch 7,) Can deposit any material on any substrate (in principal) Start with pumping down to high

RECENT EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ON AMORPHOUS CARBON COATINGS FOR ELECTRON CLOUD MITIGATION

Thermal Evaporation. Theory

Thin Films: Sputtering Systems (Jaeger Ch 6 & Ruska Ch 7,) Sputtering: gas plasma transfers atoms from target to substrate Can deposit any material

New Dual Magnetron Plasma Source Designed For Large Area Substrate Pretreatment and Oxide Film Deposition P. Morse, R. Lovro, M. Rost, and J.

Vacuum System of ERL High Voltage DC Gun at Cornell

Recent Experimental Results on Amorphous Carbon Coatings for Electron Cloud Mitigation

Overview of Advanced Surface Science activities at CERN. S.Calatroni, M.Taborelli TE-VSC-SCC

Keywords: Sputter deposition; Reactive deposition; Nitride coatings ABSTRACT

Vacuum deposition of TiN

ECE 440 Lecture 27 : Equilibrium P-N Junctions I Class Outline:

Maximizing the Potential of Rotatable Magnetron Sputter Sources for Web Coating Applications

Surface treatments for vacuum applications at CERN

Nonevaporable getter films for ultrahigh vacuum applications

Metallization deposition and etching. Material mainly taken from Campbell, UCCS

Linear Broad Beam Ion Sources ACC-30x150 IS, ACC-40x300 IS and ACC-40 x 600 IS

MAGNION Series Sputter Deposition Systems and Cathodes

A Design for an efficient cylindrical magnetron cathode with rotating magnets and optical emission incorporated

Lesker University Vacuum Technology Classes

Managing Anode Effects and Substrate Heating from Rotatable Sputter Targets

BEHAVIOUR OF GAS CONDITIONS DURING VACUUM ARC DISCHARGES USED FOR DEPOSITION OF THIN FILMS

Combinatorial RF Magnetron Sputtering for Rapid Materials Discovery: Methodology and Applications

SAES experience in NEG coating of narrow gap insertion devices and small diameter chambers for accelerators

NANOSTRUCTURED TiN THIN FILMS SUITABLE FOR MEDICAL APPLICATIONS

Lecture Day 2 Deposition

The Hummer VI. Brian Thomas Lithography. October 29, Hummer VI THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS ERIK JOHNSON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Linear Plasma Sources for Surface Modification and Deposition for Large Area Coating

The Material (in) Dependency of Impurity Affected Thin Film Growth

Introduction Sample deposition system Cavity deposition system prototype Surface characterization Beyond niobium

2008 JINST 3 S The interface to the LHC machine. Chapter Beampipe Layout

Fundamental Characteristics of a Microwave Discharge Type Plasma Source Working under Atmosphere Pressure

ION`X HV ROUND MAGNETRONS INTRODUCTION SPECIFICATIONS OPTIONS ACCESSORIES

Study of Ion Beam Sputtering using Different Materials

III Fabrication of the samples

Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) Zheng Yang

EE 5344 Introduction to MEMS. CHAPTER 3 Conventional Si Processing

Ion-plasma technologies and equipment

Transactions on Engineering Sciences vol 2, 1993 WIT Press, ISSN

THIN NICKEL OXIDE LAYERS PREPARED BY ION BEAM SPUTTERING: FABRICATION AND THE STUDY OF ELECTROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS

New Approach to meet vacuum requirements in UHV/XHV systems by Non Evaporable Getter Technology

THE INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN CONTENT ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TiN x THIN FILMS PREPARED BY REACTIVE MAGNETRON SPUTTERING

Solar Selective Absorber Coating Methods Plasma Processes

Mass Production of Clear Barriers. Requirements on Vacuum Web Coaters for Quality Assurance. Rainer Ludwig, Applied Films, Alzenau, Germany.

HiPIMS Deposition of Metal and Oxide Coatings

Plasma Activated EB-PVD of Titanium and its Compounds by Means of Large Area SAD

Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) BY A.AKSHAYKRANTH JNTUH

Author(s) Chayahara, A; Kinomura, A; Horino, RightCopyright 1999 American Vacuum Soci

Lecture 12. Physical Vapor Deposition: Evaporation and Sputtering Reading: Chapter 12. ECE Dr. Alan Doolittle

TITANIUM MACROPARTICLE FRACTION SUPPRESSION WITH STEERED ARC AND NEGATIVE PULSE BIASING

J. B. Bates, Xiaohua Yu, C. F. Luck, and N. J. Dudney

INTRODUCTION OF SYS & System

Sputter Coating. Technical Brief

CHARGED PARTICLE PHYSICS BRANCH CODE 6750

A Plasma Emission Controller for Reactive. Magnetron Sputtering of Titanium Dioxide Films

Improvement of gas barrier properties by combination of polymer film and gas barrier layer

THE INCREASE IN THICKNESS UNIFORMITY OF FILMS OBTAINED BY MAGNETRON SPUTTERING WITH ROTATING SUBSTRATE

Growth Of TiO 2 Films By RF Magnetron Sputtering Studies On The Structural And Optical Properties

Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition

CORIAL D500. Large capacity batch system for 24/7 production environment

Cleaning and Processing for UHV/XHV at Daresbury Laboratory Keith Middleman

Report from WG1 DC guns. John Lewellen Nobuyuki Nishimori

BINP accelerator based neutron source S. Taskaev

A STUDY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMOVAL OF HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATION BY OXIDATIVE CLEANING INSIDE THE SEM.

The use of NEG Pumps and Coatings in Large Vacuum Systems: Experience and limitations

Denton 635 Sputter SOP

Status of Research on Deposition of Superconducting Films for RF Accelerating Cavities

Corial D500 No mechanical cleaning

Aluminium and silicon determination on two Si±Al sputter targets used for magnetron sputtering

Thermal Load And Heat Transfer Regarding EBPVD Of Plastic Web And Thin Metal Foils

Dr. Sabrina Lee and Dr. Rong Wei NDIA Gun and Missile Conference, New Orleans, LA April 21-24, 2008

Construction of an innovative cylindrical magnetron sputtering source for HIE- ISOLDE superconductive Nb/Cu QWRs

Thin Film Gas Sensor. Nanoelectronics and MEMS Laboratory National Electronics and Computer Technology

TOPOGRAPHY AND ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF SPUTTERED NIOBIUM FILMS

General Introduction to Microstructure Technology p. 1 What is Microstructure Technology? p. 1 From Microstructure Technology to Microsystems

Czochralski Crystal Growth

INFLUENCE OF THE ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE ON THE VACUUM PROPERTIES OF Ti-Zr-V NON-EVAPORABLE GETTER FILMS

Formation mechanism of new corrosion resistance magnesium thin films by PVD method

Performance Characteristics of a LaB 6 Bismuth Cathode for use with Hall Thrusters

Review of CMOS Processing Technology

To explore the ability of the DVD technology to create dense, pinhole-free metal oxide

Charge Breeding Experiences with an ECR and an EBIS for CARIBU

OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS. SAES GETTERS S.p.A. Italy

Spectroscopy Performance Note

CERTESS Carbon Diamond-like-Carbon (DLC) Tribological coatings Extreme Hardness + Very low friction = Exceptional Wear Resistance

EFFECT OF MATERIAL AND CONDITIONS OF MODIFICATION ON TRIBOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR OF ION-MIXED LAYERS

AC : MICROWAVE PLASMA CLEANER DESIGN FOR SEMI- CONDUCTOR FABRICATION AND MATERIALS PROCESSING LABO- RATORY USE

Pressure & Vacuum Measurement. Solutions. Series 274

Oerlikon PVD production solutions for piezoelectric materials

Transcription:

Deposition of Non-Evaporable Getter Thin Films and Vacuum Pumping Performances Ankit Sur Engineering Department, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202 The ERL (Energy Recovery Linac) proposed at Cornell University requires extreme high vacuum (XHV) conditions in many of the sub-systems, such as the photo-cathode electron gun, beam pipes adjacent to the superconducting cryo-modules, and the insertion devices [1]. Non-Evaporable Getter (NEG) thin films deposited onto the interior wall of the vacuum components is a very promising path to XHV. This project involved deposition of NEG thin films and vacuum pumping performance tests of the NEG films. I. INTRODUCTION Extreme high vacuum conditions will be required for many sub-systems, particularly the photocathode electron source, in the proposed ERL, in order to obtain and maintain high quantum efficiency [2]. To achieve and maintain the extreme high vacuum conditions in a limited space allowable, new challenges need to be met by the vacuum design team. The use of NEG (Non-Evaporable Getter) thin film deposited onto the components used in a vacuum system has revolutionized the design of vacuum systems. The NEG film brings pumping to sources of gas-loads; it provides distributed pumping in a space-limited environment and has a very low outgassing rate [1]. Vacuum Performance of NEG films deposited using argon as sputtering gas has been studied previously. This project entailed the comparison of the performance of the Titanium-Zirconium- Vanadium (TiZrV) NEG thin films, deposited using krypton (Kr) and using argon (Ar) as the discharge gas, onto the interior wall of stainless steel pipes. Krypton is being used as a discharge gas, even though it s a more expensive gas, because some tests have indicated that argon embeds itself in the NEG film. The embedded argon may reduce the quality of the NEG film. The aim of this project was to compare the NEG film pumping performance between krypton and argon as the discharge gas. II. NEG THIN FILM DEPOSITION NEG thin films can be deposited onto the objects that go inside a vacuum, using many different techniques such as Triode Discharge Devices, Magnetrons, RF Sputtering, Ion-beam sputtering, Planar Diode and the DC Glow Discharge [3]. The TiZrV NEG films were deposited using the DC Magnetron Sputtering technique. The deposition system is shown in Figure 1. The DC Magnetron Sputtering technique was employed due to its simplicity and lower sputtering gas pressure. The SST pipe to be coated was pumped by an 80 l/s turbo-molecular pump (TMP) through a gate valve, which was used to control the pumping speed of the coating chamber. A solenoid was placed around the SST pipe to generate the magnetic field. A sputtering cathode, formed by twisting 1 mm diameter wires of Zr/Ti/V, was connected to a SHV feedthrough at the top and a ceramic standoff at the bottom. Krypton was released into the system using a variable leak valve; and the Kr pressure in the sputtering chamber was controlled by the combination of the gate valve and the leak valve. Electron cloud was formed around the negatively biased cathode from the cross field (the DC electric field and the magnetic field) arrangement. Kr was ionized by the electron impact in the electron cloud and the Kr + ions were accelerated towards the cathode. Due to energized particles (ions) colliding with the cathode, atoms of TiZrV were freed from the cathode and traveled to the material to be coated to form thin films. The sputtering parameters, listed in Table I, were optimized to provide maximum allowable sputtering current at minimum krypton pressure. 1

Table I Sputtering parameters Magnetic Field Cathode Voltage Kr Pressure Sputtering Current 230 Gauss 600 V 60 mtorr ~ 25 ma Figure 1 NEG Film Deposition System The deposition rate of the film can be calculated using: R growth I ion YSputter = ( nm / sec) (1) 2 π al q n e NEG where I ion is the sputtering ion current in ma, Y sputter is the average sputtering yield, a is the radius of the SST pipe in cm, L is the effective length of the sputtering plasma in cm, q e is the elementary charge of an electron in Coulombs, and n NEG is the atomic density of NEG film in cm -3. Y sputter and n NEG can be calculated using equation 2 and 3, respectively. Y sputter = 1.92 2.02e -.781E (2) n = 1 NEG ( xnti + ynv nzr ) x + y + 1 + (3) The Kr sputtering yield was compiled from Journal of Applied Physics, and Nuclear Instruments and Methods; and can be fitted by the empirical formula (2), where E is the Kr + energy in kev. The n Ti, n V, n Zr in equation 3 are the atomic number densities of pure Ti, V, Zr metals listed in Table II. The x and y are the fractional atomic ratios of Ti and V to Zr, respectively, determined by 2

Rutherford Back Scattering (RBS) measurement. The average values of x and the y were 1.05 and 1.85, respectively. The a and the L for the SST tube were 4.92 cm and 36.35 cm, respectively. The recorded film growth rate and accumulated film thickness are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively, as a function of deposition time. The average film deposition rate was 14.1 nm/sec and the final film thickness was 1.7 µm. Table II Atomic number densities [4] Titanium Zirconium Vanadium -3 n (cm ) 5.62*10 22 4.2*10 22 6.82*10 22 Figure 2 NEG thin film growth rate Figure 3 Accumulated NEG film thickness vs. deposition time 3

III. NEG FILM PUMPING PERFORMANCE Once the SST pipes were coated with TiZrV, they were installed in a testing apparatus shown in Figure 4, to evaluate its vacuum performance. A test gas, usually CO or N 2 was introduced from a calibrated leak at the top, the gas flows through the coated pipe, a 0.25 diameter orifice, and then pumped by a TMP at the bottom. Inverted magnetron cold cathode gauges are used to measure the pressures above (P 1 ) and below (P 2 ) the orifice [1]. After the initial pump down, the whole system is baked in order to reduce any outgassing from other components in the testing apparatus. After cooling down from a 150 C / 24 hours bakeout, the base pressure was about 1.0 x 10-9 torr. Figure 4 NEG film vacuum pumping test apparatus The SST tube with NEG coating was then activated at various temperatures (t act 150 C) for 48 hours. All the pumping tests are done after the SST tube cooled down close to ambient temperature. The pumping performance of the NEG films was tested by a test gas. The test gasses were introduced using a crimped capillary leaks to ensure reproducibility of the gas leak rate for each test. The leak rate for N 2 and CO were measured and are listed in Table III. The test gases were introduced into the system and the pressure P 1 and P 2 were recorded until the NEG film was saturated. The pumping speed of the NEG film can be calculated from the measured P 1 and P 2 : S NEG i Q. leak C( P1 P2) = P. where Q leak is the calibrated leak of the test gas (listed in Table III), and C is the conductance of the orifice. The amount of gas the NEG film pumped, Q pumped, can be calculated using: 1 (4) 4

Q CO, N 2 pumped ( NEG 1) 2 CO, N = S P dt (5) Table III Leak rate for CO and N 2 Gas Leak Rate (torr l/s) Carbon monoxide 3.23 x 10-5 Nitrogen 6.04 x 10-6 IV. PUMPING TEST RESULTS After activating the NEG coating at different activating temperatures ranging from 150 C to 350 C for 48 hours, the NEG coating was saturated by leaking carbon monoxide into the SST tube. During the test, the pressures (P 1 and P 2 ) were recorded. The calculated pumping speed was plotted against amount pumped and the results are displayed in Figure 5. The NEG film pumping performance may be represented by the initial pumping speed and the pumping capacity of each activation cycle. The initial pumping speed, S initial, is defined as the measured pumping speed in the beginning of the saturation, which measures the NEG film reactivity after the activation. The pumping capacity, Q capacity, is defined as amount of pumped gas to reduce the pumping speed to a small level when the NEG film needs to be re-activated. Based on the data shown in Figure 5, the S initial and the Q capacity are plotted as a function of activation temperatures in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. CO Pumping Speed (L/cm 2 s) 10 1 0.1 0.01 Activation Temperatures ----------------------------------- 150 C 200 C 250 C 300 C 350 C 0.001 2 3 4 5 6 7 810-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 810-5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10-4 CO Q_pumped (Torr-L/cm 2 ) Figure 5 - Pumping Speed vs. Q pumped 5

Pumping Speed (L/cm 2 s) 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 150 200 250 300 Activation Temperatures ( C) 350 Figure 6 Initial Pumping Speed vs. Activation Temperatures 7x10-6 Q pumped (L/cm 2 s) 6 5 4 3 2 1 150 200 250 300 Activation Temperatures ( C) 350 Figure 7 Pumping Capacity vs. Activation Temperatures V. DISSCUSSION The pumping tests for NEG films deposited using argon as the discharge gas were performed previously and are shown in Figure 8, 9, and 10. As one can see the pumping speed for NEG films deposited using krypton, is much greater than the pumping speed for NEG films deposited using argon. This increase in the pumping speed could correspond to the fact that the NEG film deposited using krypton has a rougher surface texture, thus improving the adsorption rate. The pumping capacity for NEG films deposited using krypton is comparable to the NEG films deposited using argon. As for the activation temperature, the NEG film deposited using argon as the discharge gas seems to provide better pumping performance at T act < 200 C, than the NEG film deposited by krypton sputtering. 6

Figure 8 Pumping Speed vs. Q pumped of Ar-Sputtered NEG film S co (liter/cm 2 s) 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Activation Temperature ( C) Figure 9 Initial Pumping Speed vs. Activation Temperatures of Ar-Sputtered NEG film Q co x 10-6 (torr l/cm 2 ) 25 20 15 10 5 150 200 250 300 350 400 Activation Temperatures ( C) Figure 10 Pumping Capacity vs. Activation Temperatures of Ar-Sputtered NEG film 7

VI. CONCLUSION The NEG thin film was deposited using DC magnetron Sputtering onto SST pipe, using krypton as the discharge gas. It seems to have outperformed the NEG film when argon was used as the discharge gas. After studying the factors that affect the vacuum pumping performance, activation above 250 C, of the NEG thin films deposited using krypton as the discharge gas significantly improves its performance in a vacuum. This was a preliminary study, more studies are planned to confirm these results. VII. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank Dr. Yulin Li of LEPP, Cornell University for guidance in the research, to thank Dr. Giovanni Bonnivinici for providing the opportunity to conduct research, and to thank Dr. Rich Galik for doing an excellent job in directing the REU program. VIII. REFERENCES [1] http://www.lns.cornell.edu/public/erl/2003/erl03-8/erl_03_8.pdf [2] http://www.src.wisc.edu/meetings/sri2001/abstracts/list/html/2001-03-26-sinclair.html [3] R.F. Bunshah, Handbook of Deposition Technologies for films and coatings, 2 nd Ed. William Andrews, 1994 p.301-327 [4] http://cesrelog.lns.cornell.edu/mslog/vacuum/r_d/neg_coating/neg_coating.html (Restricted Access) 8