P Oskarshamn site investigation. Hydrochemical logging in KLX06. Cecilia Berg, Geosigma AB. September 2005

Similar documents
P Oskarshamn site investigation. Hydrochemical logging in KLX05. Cecilia Berg, Geosigma AB. November 2005

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Hydrochemical logging in KLX20A. Kersti Nilsson, Geosigma AB. December 2006

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Hydrochemical logging in KLX13A. Anna Lindquist, Geosigma AB. December 2006

P Forsmark site investigation. Hydrochemical sampling and analyses in KFM12A

P Forsmark site investigation. Borehole KFM07A. Determination of porosity by water saturation and density by buoyancy technique

P Forsmark site investigation. Study of U oxidation states in groundwater with high U concentrations

P Forsmark site investigation. Control of microorganism content in flushing water used for drilling of KFM05A

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Drilling and sampling in soil. Installation of groundwater monitoring wells in the Laxemar area

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Groundwater flow measurements in permanent installed boreholes. Test campaign no. 1, 2005

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Groundwater monitoring program. Report for December 2002 October 2004

P Forsmark site investigations. Sampling and analyses of surface waters. Results from sampling in the Forsmark area, March 2002 to March 2003

P Forsmark site investigation. Hydro Monitoring Program. Report for August 2004 July Göran Nyberg, Eva Wass GEOSIGMA.

P Forsmark site investigation. Groundwater flow measurements in permanently installed boreholes. Test campaign no. 2, 2006

P Forsmark site investigation. Borehole KFM07A. Normal loading and shear tests on joints

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Monitoring of precipitation water chemistry Ulf Ericsson, Alf Engdahl Medins Biologi AB.

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Drilling of cored borehole KSH01. Henrik Ask, H Ask Geokonsult AB. Mansueto Morosini, Lars-Erik Samuelsson

P Forsmark site investigation. Control of microorganism content in flushing water used for drilling of KFM02A and KFM04A

P Forsmark site investigation. Hydrochemical characterisation in KFM04A

P Forsmark site investigation. Borehole KFM08A. Normal loading and shear tests on joints

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Groundwater Monitoring Program. Report for September 2007 September 2008

A Study of Groundwater Quality from Domestic Wells in the Sussex and Elgin Regions, New Brunswick

P Forsmark site investigation. Borehole KFM09A. Normal loading and shear tests on joints. Lars Jacobsson, Mathias Flansbjer.

KBS-3H DETUM Large fractures

P Forsmark site investigation. Drill hole KFM01A: Indirect tensile strength test (HUT)

6 SAMPLING OF WATER QUANTITIES, METHODS, POINTS OF ATTENTION

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Double control of microorganism content in flushing water used for drilling of KLX17A

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Monitoring of shallow groundwater chemistry Ulf Ericsson, Medins Biologi AB.

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Borehole KLX12A. Thermal properties of rocks using calorimeter and TPS method

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Monitoring of surface water chemistry Ulf Ericsson Medins Biologi AB. November 2009

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

P Forsmark site investigation. Production and respiration measurements in Lake Bolundsfjärden 2005

P Forsmark site investigation. Pumping tests and flow logging. Boreholes KFM06A (0 100 m) and HFM16

P Forsmark site investigation Hydro monitoring program. Report for April 2007 April Göran Nyberg, Eva Wass Geosigma AB.

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Complete chemical characterisation in KLX08

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Borehole KLX03, KLX05, KLX07, KLX10 and KLX11A

Appendix C Groundwater Quality

Analysis of Metals in Water, Stream Sediments and Floodplain Soils Collected March 21-23, 2005 from the Bayou Creek System. David J.

Certificate of Analysis

Assessment of Groundwater Quality in and around Neyveli Lignite Mines using GIS and Water Quality Index, Cuddalore District, Tamil Nadu

Uranium concentrations in the bedrock groundwater of the Riutta area results from 2009 sampling campaign Kaija Juha & Pullinen Arto

Low Pressure Bottom Hole Sample Collection For Complex Water Characterization

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Complete chemical characterisation in KLX15A. Results from the investigated borehole section: to 634.

P Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory. Difference flow logging in boreholes KA3011A01 and KA3065A01. Eemeli Hurmerinta, Janne Pekkanen Pöyry Finland Oy

P Forsmark site investigation. Chemical characterisation in borehole KFM07A. Results from the investigated section at

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Slug tests in groundwater monitoring wells in soil in the Laxemar area

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Difference flow logging of borehole KLX14A. Subarea Laxemar. Juha Väisäsvaara, PRG-Tec Oy.

1. Introduction. 2. Scope and application. 3. Objectives

ScienceDirect. Identification of saltwater intrusion/assessment scheme in groundwater using the role of empirical knowledge

P Forsmark site investigation. Groundwater flow measurements in permanently installed boreholes. Test campaign no. 4, 2008

Hydrochemical monitoring of near surface groundwater and surface waters

Factors Governing the Performance of Bauxite for Fluoride Remediation of Groundwater

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Hydraulic tests and flow logging in borehole HSH03. Jan-Erik Ludvigson, Jakob Levén, Stig Jönsson Geosigma AB

Waste Minimization Methods for Treating Analytical Instrumentation Effluents at the Source

P Forsmark site investigation. Difference flow logging in borehole KFM08C

SVENSK STANDARD SS-ISO :2005

Chemical composition of seawater; Salinity and the major constituents

P Forsmark site investigation. Chemical characterisation in borehole KFM06A

P Forsmark site investigation. Difference flow logging in borehole KFM10A. Mikael Sokolnicki, Jari Pöllänen, Janne Pekkanen PRG-Tec Oy

P Forsmark site investigation. Hydraulic interference test. Boreholes KFM04A, HFM10, HFM13, HFM19 and HFK252

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Hardness. Concentration is. What s the concentration of red triangles? What s in your pipes? 500 ml

CHARACTERIZATION OF DYE INDUSTRY EFFLUENT AND ASSESSMENT OF ITS SUITABILITY FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSE

Drinking of tap water is smart, but how do it better? A tap water quality research

OCN 201 Chemical Oceanography Class Notes, Fall 2014 The origin of sea salt Chris Measures, Department of Oceanography

Report Transmission Cover Page

ABSTRACT: Clean sampling and analysis procedures were used to quantify more than 70 inorganic chemical constituents (including 36 priority

Report on Activities

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

P Forsmark site investigation. Hydrochemical characterisation in KFM02A

P Forsmark site investigation Hydro monitoring program. Report for May 2008 April Göran Nyberg, Eva Wass Geosigma AB.

IPR Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory. International Progress Report. Backfill and Plug Test. Sensor data report (Period: ) Reprot No:2

ScienceDirect. Shallow hydrogeological and hydrochemical characterization of the Aquistore CO 2 sequestration site in Estevan, Saskatchewan, Canada

P Hydrochemical characterisation in borehole KFM10A

Groundwater Forensics to Evaluate Molybdenum Concentrations Near a CCR Landfill

Worldwide Pollution Control Association

SVENSK STANDARD SS-ISO 15473

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

REVIEW OF DEEP WAIRAU AQUIFER - GROUNDWATER CHEMISTRY ASPECTS. July 2008

Standard Solutions (Traceable to NIST)

Appendix C: Water Quality Data

Radiocarbon Dating, non-bone samples

Sampling and Sample Integrity

Investigation of the Impact of Forrest Fires on the Chemistry and Water Quality of Ground Water in Yellowstone National Park

Application Notes for COD Analysis DETERMINATION OF CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) IN WATER AND WASTE WATER.

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Hydraulic interference tests in HLX34, HLX37 and HLX42. Laxemar subarea

Blank Optimization Using Ultrapure Water Suitable for Trace Ion Analysis.

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012, 4(9): Research Article

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Hydraulic interference tests of HLX27, HLX28, HLX32 and single hole pumping test of KLX27A.

Background Statement for SEMI Draft Document 5134 Revision to SEMI C , Specifications for Hydrofluoric Acid

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Slug tests in groundwater monitoring wells in soil in the Simpevarp area

P Forsmark site investigation. Pumping tests and flow logging boreholes HFM23, HFM27 and HFM28. Stig Jönsson, Jan-Erik Ludvigson Geosigma AB

Environmental Chemistry - Water HL

Arsenic Detections. Florida 1995 to 2008 data. As exceedance (> 10 ug/l) As detection (< 10 ug/l) (Author Unknown)

INSPECTA SKB. Report No.: Revision No.: 2

P Oskarshamn site investigation. Groundwater flow measurements in borehole KLX21B. Pernilla Thur, Erik Gustafsson. Geosigma AB.

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ANALYSIS III

P Forsmark site investigation. Pumping tests and flow logging. Boreholes HFM33, HFM34 and HFM35

Sustainable waste water treatment. reuse option for commercial and residential buildings

P Forsmark site investigation. Hydrochemical characterisation in KFM03A

Transcription:

P-05-85 Oskarshamn site investigation Hydrochemical logging in KLX06 Cecilia Berg, Geosigma AB September 2005 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19

ISSN 1651-4416 SKB P-05-85 Oskarshamn site investigation Hydrochemical logging in KLX06 Cecilia Berg, Geosigma AB September 2005 Keywords: Core drilled borehole, Groundwater, Water sampling, Chemical analyses. This report concerns a study which was conducted for SKB. The conclusions and viewpoints presented in the report are those of the author and do not necessarily coincide with those of the client. A pdf version of this document can be downloaded from www.skb.se

Abstract Hydrochemical logging, or so called tube sampling, has been performed in the core drilled borehole KLX06. The method is a fast and simple sampling technique for obtaining information about the chemical composition of the water along an open borehole. The equipment consists of an approximately 1,000 m long polyamide tube divided into units of 50 m. The water content in each tube unit constituted one sample. Every other sample, starting with the uppermost tube unit, was analysed according to SKB chemistry class 3 (no options included). Samples for isotope determination were collected at the time of sampling and stored in a freezer (tritium ( 3 H) and carbon isotopes in a refrigerator); δ 18 O, deuterium (δd), 10 B, tritium, δ 37 Cl and 87 Sr from odd-numbered tube units and δ 34 S and carbon isotopes from even-numbered tube units. The content of flushing water remaining in the borehole after drilling was quite high in the deeper parts of the borehole. The maximum amount of flushing water was found at approximately 940 m where it was 60%. The relative charge balance error exceeded the acceptable limit of ± 5% in two out of ten analysed samples, no 7982 ( 5.33%) from section 0 40 m and no 7994 (8.21%) from section 590 640 m along the borehole. The charge balance error was just outside the acceptable limit for the first of the two samples above. 3

Sammanfattning Hydrokemisk loggning, eller så kallad slangprovtagning, har utförts i det kärnborrade borrhålet KLX06. Metoden är snabb och enkel att använda för att erhålla information om den kemiska sammansättningen hos grundvattnet längs ett öppet borrhål. Utrustningen består av en cirka 1 000 m lång polyamidslang uppdelad i enheter om vardera 50 m. Innehållet i en slangenhet utgör ett prov. Varannan slangenhet, med start från den översta, analyserades enligt SKB kemiklass 3 (exklusive tillval). Prover för bestämning av isotoptillvalen togs ut vid provtagningstillfället och sparades i frys (tritium ( 3 H) och kolisotoper i kylskåp); δ 18 O, deuterium (δd), 10 B, tritium, δ 37 Cl och 87 Sr ur udda enheter, δ 34 S och kolisotoper ur jämna enheter. Halten kvarvarande spolvatten i borrhålet efter borrning var ganska hög i de djupare sektionerna. Den högsta spolvattenhalten uppmättes till just över 60 % i botten på borrhålet. Det relativa felet i jonbalansen översteg den acceptabla nivån av ± 5 % i två av tio analyserade prover, nummer 7982 ( 5,33 %) från sektion 0 40 meter samt nummer 7994 (8,21 %) från sektion 590 640 meter längs borrhålet. Jonbalansfelet var just utanför den acceptabla gränsen i det första av de två fallen. 4

Contents 1 Introduction 7 2 Objective and scope 9 3 Sampling equipment 11 4 Performance 13 4.1 Hydrochemical logging 13 4.2 Sample treatment and chemical analysis 13 4.3 Data handling 15 4.4 Nonconformities 16 5 Results 17 5.1 Analysis results 17 5.2 Quality of the analyses 19 6 Conclusions 21 7 References 23 Appendix 1 Sampling and analysis method 25 Appendix 2 Water composition 27 5

1 Introduction This document reports the performance and results from hydrochemical logging in borehole KLX06. The hydrochemical logging is one of the activities performed within the site investigation at Oskarshamn /1/. The work was carried out in accordance with activity plan SKB AP PS 400-04-109 (SKB internal controlling document). The controlling documents for the performance of this activity are listed in Table 1-1. The obtained data from the activity are reported to the database SICADA. Borehole KLX06 is a 997.98 m long telescopic borehole, drilled within the site investigation in the Oskarshamn area. The percussion borehole HLX20 served as the source of flushing water for the drilling of KLX06. The location of KLX06 is shown in Figure 1-1. Table 1-1. SKB internal controlling documents for the performance of the activity. Activity plan Number Version Hydrokemisk loggning i KLX06 AP PS 400-04-109 1.0 Method descriptions Number Version Metodbeskrivning för hydrokemisk loggning SKB MD 422.001 1.0 Figure 1-1. Location of the core drilled borehole KLX06 within the site investigation in the Oskarshamn area. 7

2 Objective and scope Hydrochemical logging was performed in order to obtain an overview of the chemical composition of the water along the open borehole KLX06. The technique used for sampling is fast and simple, even at great depth. The analysis program was carried out according to SKB chemistry class 3 except for optional isotopes. Sample portions intended for isotope analyses were collected at the time of sampling, but have not been analysed. The samples are stored in a freezer at SKB (except the samples collected for determination of tritium and carbon isotopes; these samples were stored in a refrigerator) until further notice. If samples from the activity are analysed for isotopes, the results from those analyses will be presented in a separate report. 9

3 Sampling equipment For the hydrochemichal logging an approximately 1,000 m long polyamide tube, divided into units of 50 m, was used. The equipment is described in the method description, see Table 1-1. A schematic picture of the equipment used for the hydrochemichal logging is shown in Figure 3-1. The tube units are connected using couplings. The length of each tube unit is given in Table 3-1. The first tube lowered down the borehole has a non-return valve at the bottom to prevent water outflow while lifting the tube units. The external and internal diameters of the tube units are 10 and 8 mm, respectively. The water content in each tube unit constitutes one sample, and the volume of each sample is approximately two and a half litres. At the lower end of the tube array, a weight is added in order to stretch the array and thereby prevent fastening. Figure 3-1. Equipment for hydrochemical logging in boreholes. At the lower end of the tube array there is a check valve and a weight connected. Each tube unit is 50 m long. 11

Table 3-1. Length of tube units used for the hydrochemical logging in KLX06. Unit Length (m) 1 49.71 2 50.08 3 49.77 4 49.28 5 49.97 6 50.01 7 49.85 8 49.87 9 49.57 10 49.72 11 49.67 12 50.25 13 50.62 14 49.70 15 49.22 16 49.20 17 49.30 18 49.63 19 49.62 20 49.87 Sum: 994.91 Couplings 2.812 Weight 0.817 Total tube length: 998.539 12

4 Performance 4.1 Hydrochemical logging The hydrochemichal logging in KLX06 was performed on December 21, 2004. The lowering of the tube units started at 08:17. The tubes were lowered down the borehole at a rate of about five metres/minute. The equipment was lowered to a depth of 990 m, i.e. the length of the borehole subtracted by 8 m, in order to avoid sedimentation of drilling debris at the bottom of the borehole, and thereby decrease the risk of fastening. The lifting of the tubes started at 12:03, and the last tube unit was retrieved at 13:29. The tube unit at the top of the tube array was lowered to 40 m of its length. This and a ground water level at the logging occation resulted in a not completely filled tube unit. Pressurized nitrogen gas was used to empty the tube units and the water samples were portioned into sample bottles. Each tube unit represents one sample. The ground water level before and after completed logging was 5.90 m and 5.96 m, respectively, measured from the top of the casing. 4.2 Sample treatment and chemical analysis An overview of sample treatment and analysis routines is given in Appendix 1. The routines are applicable irrespectively of sampling object or sampling method. An overview showing the samples obtained at the logging occasion is given in Table 4-1. Sample portions intended for isotope analyses were collected at the sampling occasion but not sent for analysis. These samples are stored in a freezer at SKB (except the sample collected for tritium determination which is stored in refrigerator). The collected samples intended for isotope analysis may be sent for analysis, and in that case, the results will be presented in a separate report. The data from the hydrochemical logging are stored in the database SICADA. The SKB sample numbers are 7982 7999 and 10000 10001. The uppermost tube unit was not completely filled, see Section 4.1. All other tube units seemed, by visual inspection, to be fully filled with sample water; only small bubbles of gas was observed during lifting. Due to the lack of water in the first tube unit, see above, archive samples from the second tube unit was not obtained. Water intended for archive samples in the second unit were used to fill sample bottles for analyses of δ 37 Cl, 10 B/ 11 B and 86 Sr/ 87 Sr from the first section (0 40 m). 13

Table 4-1. Overview of samples collected at the hydrochemical logging in KLX06. Filled cells represent collected samples. Dark (blue) filling represents samples that has been analysed, light (yellow) filling represents samples collected and stored in a freezer (tritium and carbon isotopes in a refrigerator) and dashed (purple) cells represent archive samples. Sample information Collected sample portions Archive Tube unit Length (m) 1 0 40 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 90 140 190 240 290 340 390 440 490 540 590 640 690 740 790 840 890 940 990 SKB no Cond, ph, alk Major Comp Uranine Anions 3 H δd/ δ 18 O 7982 ж ж ж 7983 7984 7985 7986 7987 7988 7989 7990 7991 7992 7993 7994 7995 7996 7997 7998 7999 10000 10001 ж Filled with sample water from tube unit 2. δ 37 10 Cl B 87 Sr δ 34 S C-isotopes Filtered 2 250 ml 14

4.3 Data handling The following routines for quality control and data management are generally applied for hydrogeochemical analysis data, irrespectively of sampling method or sampling object. All analytical results were stored in the SICADA database. The applied hierarchy path Hydrochemistry/Hydrochemical investigation/analyses/water in the database contains two types of tables, raw data tables and primary data tables (final data tables). Data from basic water analyses are inserted into raw data tables for further evaluation. The evaluation results in a final data set for each sample. These data sets are compiled in a primary data table named water_composition. The evaluation is based on: Comparison of the results from different laboratories and/or methods. The analyses are repeated if a large disparity is noted (generally more than 10%). Calculation of charge balance errors. Relative errors within ± 5% are considered acceptable (in surface waters ± 10%). Relative error (%) = 100 cations cations ( equivalents) anions( equivalents) ( equivalents) + anions( equivalents) General expert judgement of plausibility based on earlier results and experiences. All results from special analyses of trace metals and isotopes are inserted directly into primary data tables. In cases where the analyses are repeated or performed by more than one laboratory, a best choice notation will indicate the results considered most reliable. An overview of the data management is given in Figure 4-1. 15

Water sample Comments on sampling Insertion of sampling activity and sample no SICADA Basic water analysis by SKB Mobile field laboratory or Äspö chemical laboratory Basic water analysis by external laboratory Special analysis by external laboratory SICADA - Insertion of raw data (- Calculation of result, SKB analysis) (- Selection of best determ or aver calc SKB analyses) - Storage in raw data tables Storage of raw data - File system - Binders SICADA - Charge balance calculation - Quality control - Selection of dataset for sample - Insertion of comments on control and evaluation - Transfer of data to primary data table SICADA - Storage in primary data table - QC Figure 4-1. Overview of data management for hydrogeochemical data. 4.4 Nonconformities The activity was performed according to the controlling documents without any deviations that can affect the quality of the data. 16

5 Results 5.1 Analysis results Results from the chemical analysis are given in Appendix 2. Diagrams showing the flushing water content and the electric conductivity along the borehole, at the time of the hydrochemical logging, are presented in Figures 5-1 and 5-2. Results from analyses of ph, some of the major constituents (Na, Ca and Cl ) and sulphate (SO 4 2 ) are shown in Figures 5-3 to 5-5, respectively. Results are plotted for the mid-length of each tube unit. For example, the first tube is plotted at 20 m. 200 Electric conductivity (ms/m) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Borehole length (m) Figure 5-1. Amount of flushing water remaining at different borehole lengths at the time of the hydrochemical logging in KLX06. 70.0 Amount flushing water (%) 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Borehole length (m) Figure 5-2. Electric conductivity values along the borehole KLX06 obtained from the hydrochemical logging. 17

8.80 8.60 8.40 ph 8.20 8.00 7.80 7.60 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Borehole length (m) Figure 5-3. Results from ph measurements obtained from the hydrochemical logging in KLX06. Concentration (mg/l) 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 Na Ca Cl 50 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Borehole length (m) Figure 5-4. Results from analysis of the constituents Na, Ca and Cl in water samples obtained from hydrochemical logging in KLX06. Sulphate (SO 4 2 ) analysed by using ion chromatography (IC) is compared with sulphate determined as total sulphur using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) in Figure 5-5. The values obtained from ICP-AES are higher than from IC in all samples. 18

180 160 140 SO4 (IC) 3xSO4_S (ICP-AES) Concentration (mg/l) 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 Borehole length (m) Figure 5-5. Sulphate (IC) compared to total sulphur (ICP-AES). 5.2 Quality of the analyses The charge balance errors give an indication of the quality and uncertainty of the analyses of major constituents. The relative charge balance errors were calculated for the selected sets of data, see Appendix 2. If the relative errors are within ± 5% they are considered acceptable. The errors did exceed 5% in two out of ten cases, no 7982 ( 5.33%) and 7994 (8.21%). Sample 7994 indicates an error larger than the 8.21% charge balance error. 19

6 Conclusions At the hydrochemical logging in KLX06, the following chemical conditions were found: The amount of remaining flushing water at the time of the hydrochemical logging was increasing down the borehole. The maximum was found at the bottom of the borehole where it was just above 60%. The charge balance error, giving an indication of the quality and uncertainty of the analyses, exceeded the acceptable level in two cases, sample no 7982 (charce balance 5.33%) from section 0 40 m and sample no 7994 (charge balance 8.21%) from section 590 640 m. The electric conductivity and the chloride concentration increased only slightly down the borehole. The highest values were 190 ms/m and 430 mg/l, respectively (both values from the deepest part measured along the borehole). Sample no 7994 is somewhat deviating from the other samples with its charge balance error and deviation from the trend of increasing values for content of flushing water and major components down the borehole. The deviation may partly be explained by the higher amount of flushing water compared to the adjacent sections, but the electric conductivity is not lower in sample 7994 than in nearby sections as would be expected if that was the case. The results for this sample are questionable and error during sampling and/or analyses can not be excluded even if no deviations of such are reported. 21

7 References /1/ SKB, 2001. Generellt genomförande program för platsundersökningar. SKB R-01-10, Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB. 23

Appendix 1 Sampling and analysis method Table A1-1. Overview of general sample handling routines and analysis methods. Component group Component/element Sample container (material) Volume (ml) Filtering Preparation/ conservation* Analysis method Laboratory*** Analysis within or delivery time to lab Anions 1 HCO3 ph(lab) cond (lab) Plastic 250 No No Titration Pot. meas, Cond. meas Anions 2 Cl, SO4, Br, F, I Plastic 250 Yes (not in the field) Cations, Si and S according to SKB class 3 Environmental isotopes Na, K, Ca, Mg, S(tot), Si(tot), Li, Sr Plastic (at low conc acid washed bottles) 100 Yes (not in the field) 2 H, 18 O Plastic 100 No No Titration (Cl ) IC (Cl, SO 4, Br, F ) ISE (F ) Yes (not in the field, 1 ml HNO3) ICP-AES ICP-MS Äspö s chemistry lab Äspö s chemistry lab The same day maximum 24 hours Not critical (month) Analytica AB Not critical (month) MS IFE Not critical (month) Tritium, 3 H (enhanced.) Plastic (dry bottle) 500 No LSC Univ Of Waterloo Not critical (month) Chlorine-37 Chlorine-37 Plastic 500 No ICP MS Univ Of Waterloo Not critical (month) Carbon isotopes 13 C, 14 C Glass (brown) 100 2 No (A)MS Univ Of Waterloo The Ångström laboratory, Uppsala Sulphur isotopes 34 S Plastic 500 1,000 No Combustion, ICP MS IFE No limit A few days Strontium-isotopes 87 Sr/ 86 Sr Plastic 100 No TIMS IFE Days or Week Boron isotopes 10 B Plastic 100 Yes Yes (1 ml HNO 3) ICP MS Analytica AB No limit Archive samples without acid Plastic 250 2 ** Yes No Storage in freeze * Suprapur acid is used for conservation of samples. ** Minimum number, the number of archive samples can vary depending on how many similar samples that are collected at the same occasion. *** Full name and address is given in Table A1-2. 25

Abbreviations and definitions: IC Ion chromatograph ISE Ion selective electrode ICP-AES Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry ICP-MS Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry INAA Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis MS Mass Spectrometry LSC Liquid Scintillation Counting (A)MS (Accelerator) Mass Spectrometry GC Gas Chromatography Table A1-2. Consulted laboratories, full name and address. Äspö waterchemical laboratory (SKB) Analytica AB Aurorum 10 977 75 Luleå (Nytorpsvägen 16 Box 511 183 25 Täby) Environmental Isotope Laboratory Dep Of Earth Sciences University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 CANADA Institutt for energiteknik (IFE) Insituttveien 18 P.O Box 40 2027 Kjeller NORGE The Ångström laboratory Box 534 Se-751 21 Uppsala 26

Appendix 2 Water composition Compilation April 2005 Idcode Secup Seclow Sample Charge Na K Ca Mg HCO3 Cl SO4 2 SO4-S Br F Si Fe Mn Li Sr ph m m no Bal % mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l mg/l KLX06 0 40 7982 5.33 69.1 2.13 22.8 3.5 157 42.9 26.2 17.0 < 0.20 3.09 6.61 0.084 0.208 0.014 0.174 7.72 KLX06 40 90 7983 KLX06 90 140 7984 4.80 87.5 1.74 15.4 2.6 188 37.5 27.4 15.8 < 0.20 3.99 6.85 0.569 0.121 0.016 0.163 7.84 KLX06 140 190 7985 KLX06 190 240 7986 3.78 98.8 1.53 10.8 1.9 207 31.5 27.5 14.4 < 0.20 4.77 5.87 0.038 0.055 0.014 0.155 8.28 KLX06 240 290 7987 KLX06 290 340 7988 2.96 106.0 1.63 8.5 1.5 216 29.5 29.5 14.0 < 0.20 5.26 5.68 0.060 0.030 0.016 0.152 8.53 KLX06 340 390 7989 KLX06 390 440 7990 2.44 112.0 1.73 7.9 1.4 218 32.7 32.5 14.7 < 0.20 5.44 5.63 0.054 0.024 0.018 0.161 8.66 KLX06 440 490 7991 KLX06 490 540 7992 1.86 118.0 1.90 8.7 1.4 215 40.9 37.7 15.9 < 0.20 5.49 5.68 0.086 0.024 0.020 0.183 8.59 KLX06 540 590 7993 KLX06 590 640 7994 8.21 212.0 3.43 55.6 5.3 213 156.0 92.1 39.9 0.93 4.77 4.50 0.139 0.102 0.034 1.030 8.70 KLX06 640 690 7995 KLX06 690 740 7996 1.35 135.0 2.44 13.0 1.7 209 68.7 53.6 20.4 0.33 5.23 5.38 0.029 0.027 0.022 0.255 8.68 KLX06 740 790 7997 KLX06 790 840 7998 1.96 139.0 2.74 14.7 1.8 209 78.9 59.7 21.6 0.33 5.43 5.54 0.151 0.032 0.024 0.279 8.67 KLX06 840 890 7999 KLX06 890 940 10000 1.64 283.0 3.48 94.7 8.6 169 429.0 153.0 53.8 3.43 3.83 3.38 0.100 0.169 0.042 1.740 8.28 KLX06 940 990 10001 27

Compilation April 2005 Idcode Secup Seclow Sample Drill_water ElCond δ 2H δ18o 3H δ37cl 10B/11B 87Sr/86Sr δ34s δ13c 14C m m no % ms/m dev SMOW dev SMOW TU dev SMOC no unit no unit dev CDT dev PDB pmc KLX06 0 40 7982 8.1 48.7 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 40 90 7983 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 90 140 7984 7.5 48.5 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 140 190 7985 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 190 240 7986 9.6 50.2 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 240 290 7987 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 290 340 7988 14.4 52.0 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 340 390 7989 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 390 440 7990 19.4 54.4 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 440 490 7991 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 490 540 7992 23.9 58.1 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 540 590 7993 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 590 640 7994 50.4 63.8 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 640 690 7995 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 690 740 7996 37.6 69.4 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 740 790 7997 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 790 840 7998 37.9 73.5 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 840 890 7999 xxx xxx xxx KLX06 890 940 10000 64.0 185.0 xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx KLX06 940 990 10001 xxx xxx xxx = Not analysed A = results will be reported later x = No result due to sampling problems xx = No result due to analytical problems xxx = Stored in freezer/refrigerator < = result below detection limit Charge Bal % = Relative charge balance error % 28