The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) 2035 Plan: Roadways Element

Similar documents
INTRODUCTION Chapter 1

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

Oklahoma Long Range Transportation Plan

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS

Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS. Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation. Prepared by:

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Williamsport Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization

Chapter 6 Freight Plan

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

1.0 Introduction to Transportation Planning

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

AICP EXAM REVIEW. Transportation Planning. February 19, 2016

INTEGRATING FREIGHT IN CORRIDOR PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. Steve Linhart, AICP Caroline Mays, AICP

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Appendix E-1. FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook. (Excerpts)

APPENDIX TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING OVERVIEW MAJOR FEATURES OF THE MODEL

Technical Briefing Report

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

CHAPTER 4. Existing Roadway Conditions. Highway Element. Kanawha County Putnam County

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017

PennDOT Office of Planning

EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS

Corpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:

CHAPTER 5: TRANSPORTATION

Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

1RUWKZHVW#:LFKLWD 0DMRU#,QYHVWPHQW#6WXG\

11. POLICIES AND STRATEGIES

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015

This plan document is available at: Oklahoma Department of Transportation Planning and Research Division 200 NE 21 st Street Oklahoma City, OK 73105

Chapter 10. Intelligent Transportation Systems. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments Regional Transportation Plan

Congestion Management Process (CMP)

KAW CONNECTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Submitted by: Oklahoma Department of Transportation. Supporting information can be found at: US-75 & I-44 Tulsa County FASTLANE

CHAPTER 5. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Transportation Goals & Objectives

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

Transportation Advisory Board May 21, 2014

Designing the Future of NMDOT

Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan

Final Recommendations Identification of Improvements, Strategies, and Solutions

Mobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan

VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

HORIZON 2030: Plan Projects November 2005

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Appendix A: Project Planning and Development A-1 White Paper on Transit and the Tappan Zee Hudson River Crossing Project

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE I 76 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROJECT TO THE CONNECTIONS 2040 PLAN FOR GREATER PHILADELPHIA

Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,

Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAC August 2, 2017

Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

Recommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance

IX. Approach to Implementation

MTP VISIONS, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES

GOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Business Item Transportation Committee Item

2016 Arizona Pavement/Materials Conference. Dennis Smith MAG Executive Director (602)

Minnesota Statewide Freight System Plan Action Agenda Development Lead Agency (MnDOT or

CORE MPO Freight Transportation Plan. Project Advisory Committee December 3, 2014

Technical Memorandum#1A

Chapter 5 - Transportation

FY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL. Regional Intergovernmental Council. June 14, Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization

MARC Congestion Management Process Policy

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

PROJECTS. The KIPDA MPO s Central Location

3.0 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES

Chapter 5. Congestion Management Program. Chapter 5

Introduction. Begin Project at US 52/Rivers Avenue. End Project at US 17/Savannah Highway

2012 PAVEMENT CONDITIONS & SCENARIOS

RTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm

INTERSTATE CORRIDOR PLANNING

Transportation Planning Needs for Small and Medium-Sized Communities

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

CHAPTER 1. A New Transportation Plan

Transportation Committee

CDTC NEW VISIONS FREIGHT & GOODS MOVEMENT

Congestion Management Process 2013 Update

Chapter 9: Vision Plan. Chapter 9. Vision Plan. Lake Loveland. Image 179 Credit: City of Loveland

MAP-21 Planning Factors & Performance Measures Technical Report

CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK

Draft MAP-21 Planning Factors & Performance Measures Technical Report

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

GULF COAST RAIL DISTRICT VISION FOR REGIONAL RAIL

2016 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan Development

Transcription:

Roadways

The Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG) The Indian Nations Council of Governments is the designated regional planning organization for the Tulsa Transportation Management Area (TMA). The region encompasses Tulsa County and portions of four surrounding counties, Creek, Osage, Rogers and Wagoner Counties. INCOG is committed to creating a vibrant future for the region through planning for regional transportation, land use and economic development, under authority embodied in state and federal laws. INCOG seeks to maintain a common vision for the region s future, expressed through three connected major activities: Development of Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) that articulates the scope, purpose and need for all modes of transportation, Assisting communities within INCOG region attain specific objectives related to Transportation through strategic initiatives and technical assistance, and advances the economic vision for all communities in the TMA through the implementation of the plans. INCOG also distributes about $13 million a year to transportation projects and provides regional data for planning. INCOG is designated under federal law as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (required for receiving federal transportation funds). 2035 Plan: Roadways Element All TMA transportation plans and programs are based on a continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive planning process, conducted in cooperation with local and state governments and modal agencies. Representatives of each member community (principally elected officials) are appointed to INCOG s Board of Directors, which serves as a forum for cooperative decision making on issues of regional significance, including transportation. The transportation planning process involves both long-term transportation system objectives and short-term implementation of projects. Long-term objectives are realized through the implementation of various cities comprehensive plans such as Major Street and Highway Plans, which represents the ultimate roadway development, and the Long Range Transportation Plan, which identifies planned transportation improvements to be implemented within the next 20 to 25 years. Short-term projects are outlined in the Transportation Improvement Program, which identifies the projects to be undertaken principally with federal funding assistance during the upcoming four years. All aspects of the process are overseen by the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) and the Technical Committee (TTC). Committee members meet monthly and include federal, state, tribal and local governments and agencies; state and local authorities; and modal interests. The TTC, an advisory group to the TPC, provides technical expertise related to development of urban transportation plans and programs for the TMA. The TPC is an ongoing forum for policy development and adoption related to urban transportation planning, programming, and operation. Upon TPC approval, transportation plans and programs are forwarded to the INCOG Board of Directors for endorsement. Study Area The 1,400 square mile Tulsa Transportation Management Area (TMA) is comprised of Tulsa County and the adjacent urbanizing portions of Creek, Osage, Rogers, and Wagoner counties. It is a part of the seven county Tulsa Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), which also includes Okmulgee and Pawnee Counties. The TMA is predominately urban, with nearly 85% of its population being within the incorporated cities of Bixby, Broken Arrow, Catoosa, Claremore, Collinsville, Coweta, Fair Oaks, Glenpool, Jenks, Kiefer, Mounds, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sapulpa, Skiatook, Sperry, Verdigris and the core city, Tulsa. As of 2010, the population of the TMA was 778,051, which accounts 36

for 83% of the Tulsa MSA population of 937,478. The Tulsa MSA is the 54th largest metropolitan area in the county and the primary city, Tulsa, is the 46th largest city in the country in terms of population. Roadways The TMA roadway system is primarily comprised of expressways and arterial streets on a roughly 1 mile grid system. The roadway system is well served by Interstate highways (I-244 and I-44) and National Highway System routes (US-75, US-169, US-64, US-412, SH-51and SH-266), as well as numerous other state and federal highways in the region. The Present Plus Committed roadway system is comprised of approximately 742 lane miles of expressways, 314 lane-miles of turnpikes, 5,100 lane miles of arterials and other regionally significant streets, and numerous miles of local streets. Reflecting the Tulsa regional economy and the national economy, major expressway traffic counts in recent years have not changed in a significant manner, when compared to previous decade. Results of Regional Modeling Roadways and automobile continues to dominate the travel in Tulsa TMA. Ensuring safety and mobility has been a cornerstone for the regional transportation. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANS»» Plans must be for a period not less than 20 years into the future.»» Plans must reflect the most recent assumptions for population, travel, land use, congestion, employment and economic activity.»» Plans must be financially constrained, and revenue assumptions must be reasonable in that funds can be expected to be available during the time frame of the plan.»» Plans must conform to the Clean Air Act and its amendments, and to applicable State Implementation Plans for regional air quality.»» Plans must be developed through an open and inclusive process that ensures public input and seeks out and considers the needs of those traditionally underserved by existing transportation systems. THE EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS REQUIRED BY SAFETEA-LU Roadways and automobile continues to dominate the travel in Tulsa TMA. Ensuring safety and mobility has been a cornerstone for the regional transportation. Table 14: Traffic Counts and Forecast Traffic for 2035. Source: ODOT 2010 Average Annual Daily Traffic adjusted for seasonal or other factors and INCOG (2035 traffic is an average weekday forecast volume of traffic. ) Expressway Segment 2010 Traffic Count 2032 Forecast Traffic US-64/SH-51 Broken Arrow Exp. (East of Memorial Road) 105,700 134,000 US-169 (51st St. to 61st St.) 123,200 129,000 I-244 (Yale Ave to Sheridan Road) 71,600 82,500 I-44 (Yale Ave. to Sheridan Road) 93,800 123,500 I-44 (East of 145th E Ave.) 70,300 107,000 US-412/US-64 (33rd W Ave. to Downtown Tulsa) 64,000 76,000 US-75 (I-44 to 61st St. South) 55,000 104,000 US-75 (36th St. North to 56th St. North) 41,500 72,000»» Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity and efficiency.»» Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users.»» Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users.»» Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and for freight.»» Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and state and local planned growth and economic development patterns.»» Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.»» Promote efficient system management and operation.»» Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. 37

The 2035 Roadways Plan identifies the following goals with regard to the to the above planning factors as well as federal requirements:»» Partner with all state and local agencies, trusts and tribal entities in the region to achieve set goals and objectives to ensure safe and economic transportation for all people and goods»» Support Oklahoma Department of Transportation and other state and local agencies under mutual agreements and partnership»» Actively work with the Port of Catoosa, Tulsa International Airport Authority, Metropolitan Tulsa Transit Authority & public and private Freight entities to advance regional connectivity, economic competiveness»» Pursue public/private partnership as appropriate to advance regional transportation goals»» Advance the Regional Intelligent Transportation System deployment through annual work program, planning support The 2035 Roadways Plan identifies following actions to implement goals identified in the Plan. Roadway Maintenance»» Maintain sufficiency rating of Adequate or higher per ODOT standards on all NHS routes in the region»» Monitor and increase funding to sufficiently maintain area roadways that are deemed regionally significant per the Long Range Transportation Plan»» Maintain pavement condition index on local roadways and seek funding solutions to enhance roadway maintenance Freight Network»» Maintain sufficiency rating of Adequate or higher per ODOT standards on all NHS routes Improve access to freight terminals through Intermodal connectors and freight network that sufficiently advances regional and statewide goals to all modes of transportation»» Assess and advance intermodal transportation activity based on economic development needs and goals Bridges»» Reduce or eliminate structurally deficient bridges on state, county and local roadways in the Tulsa Transportation Management Area»» Improve access across the region with additional river crossings»» Pursue safer railroad crossings via grade separation where possible and feasible»» Pursue funding for interchanges via flyovers over the key movements at regional bottlenecks across the freeway system Intelligent Transportation Systems»» Advance ITS and related activities to provide sufficient information to motorists and agencies to provide congestion relief»» Implement systems based on regional architecture to provide implementing agencies sufficient tools to advance the usage of ITS with respect to Travel monitoring»» Provide real time data access to the motoring public Safety & Security»» Explore, implement adequate level of Traffic Incident Management for the region involving various stakeholders»» Ensure adequate safety in the region related to motorist traffic»» Implement plans to improve safety with respect to multimodal traffic where needed Financial Feasibility & Coordination»» Coordinate all implementation activities to ensure timely completion of committed projects with all implementing agencies»» Ensure a financially viable plan of action related to each project and across the transportation system, to maintain the system that is built during its lifecycle 38

129th W Ave 113th W Ave 97th W Ave 81st W Ave 65th W Ave 49th W Ave 33rd W Ave Union Ave Elwood Ave Peoria Ave Lewis Ave Harvard Ave Memorial Dr Mingo Rd Garnett Rd 177th E Ave Roadways Enhanced Plan «11 «97 Skiatook «20 Sperry «11 Collinsville «20 «11 169 169 Owasso UV 266 «20 UV 167 64 244 Creek Tpke Roadways Enhanced Plan 166th St N 156th St N Expressway 8-lane, Existing Expressway 8-lane, Planned UV 266 «66 Verdigris «88 «66 Claremore «88 «20 146th St N 66th St N 56th St N 46th St N 36th St N Apache St Pine St 136th St N 126th St N 116th St N 106th St N 96th St N 86th St N 76th St N Expressway 6-lane, Existing Expressway 6-lane, Planned Expresswayl 4-lane, Existing Expresswayl 4-lane, Planned Arterial 6-lane, Existing Arterial 6-lane, Planned Arterial 4-lane, Existing Arterial 4-lane, Planned Arterial 2-lane, Existing Arterial 2-lane, Planned Bodies of Water County Boundaries TMA Boundary UV 97T Catoosa 412 Admiral Pl 11th St 21st St «51 «97 412 64 Sand Springs 244 Tulsa «66 «51 169 «51 31st St 41st St 51st St 61st St 71st St Sapulpa «66 Jenks Creek Tpke Broken Arrow Muskogee Tpke 81st St 91st St 101st St 111th St «33 «66 UV 117 A Kiefer «67 Glenpool «67 Bixby 64 «51 Coweta UV 51B 121st St «51 131st St 171st St 181st St 141st St 151st St 161st St Miles 0 1 2 3 4 5 Mounds Yale Ave Sheridan Rd 129th E Ave 145th E Ave 161st E Ave 193rd E Ave 209th E Ave 64 225th E Ave 241st E Ave 257th E Ave 273rd E Ave 289th E Ave «72 191st St 201st St The information on this map, including tables, numbers, graphics and text is provided on an AS IS basis. Neither INCOG nor any of its officials or employees or its member governments make any warranty of any kind for this information express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. This map is provided as a public resource for general information only. Although every effort has been made to produce the most current, correct and clearly expressed data possible, all geographic information has limitations due to scale, resolution, date and interpretation of the original source materials. The information on this map is collected from various sources that can change over time without notice. Therefore, the information provided is not intended to replace any official source. You should not act or refrain from acting based upon information on this map without independently verifying the information and, if necessary, obtaining professional advice. The burden of determining the accuracy, completeness, timeliness of information rests solely on the user. Copyright 2012 INCOG

Long Range Transportation Plan Modeling Summary Vehicle Miles Traveled Lane Miles Year 2010 2035 Scenarios Year 2010 2035 Scenarios Functional Class E+C 2032 Plan 2035 Plan E+C 2032 Plan 2035 Plan Interstate 12,017,000 14,134,000 15,028,000 15,083,000 742.3 756.5 875.8 875.8 Tollway 1,741,000 2,366,000 2,366,000 2,366,000 314.0 327.3 328.6 328.6 Arterials & Parkways 13,531,000 18,685,000 17,976,000 16,907,000 4,838 4,849 5,316 5,565 Other 1,804,000 2,334,000 2,126,000 2,248,000 498 503 503 503 Total 29,093,000 37,519,000 37,496,000 36,604,000 6,392 6,436 7,014 7,268 40