Electrical Conductivity & Hydraulic Profiling. The Combining of Two Subsurface Investigation Methods (With More to Come)

Similar documents
3. FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM

Lecture 4: Contaminated Site Characterization

MiHpt Membrane Interface Probe + Hydraulic Profiling Tool

USE OF HIGH RESOLUTION CHARACTERIZATION DATA TO OPTIMIZE SOURCE AREA REMEDIATION AT AOC 50 AT FORMER BASE FORT DEVENS

Exploring Dynamic Interactions Between Surface Water and Groundwater at a Point Bar System in the Muskegon River Watershed


CMYK. Pantone. Westbay System. Greyscale. Black on White. White on Black. Multi-level Technology for Subsurface Characterization and Monitoring

Converting Membrane Interface Probe Sensor Results Into Volatile Organic Chemical Non Aqueous Phase Liquid Distribution Information

Soil Improvement by Compaction Grouting

atertech Banff, AB. April 29-May 1, 2009

Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

Site Investigation MUHAMMAD AZRIL HEZMI

Introduction to CPT. Peter K. Robertson. Santiago, Chile. CPT in Geotechnical Practice. July, 2014

Subsurface Investigation Report. Proposed New 1-Story Building 6447 Grand Avenue Gurnee, Illinois

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Infiltration Testing Guide

SITE INVESTIGATION. Foundation Engineering

Vertex Environmental Inc.

Underground Heterogeneity 9/5/2017. Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction. Groundwater Sampling. Groundwater Movement and Related Terms.

#47 CASE STUDY INSTALLATION OF A SOIL-BENTONITE CUTOFF WALL THROUGH AN ABANDONED COAL MINE (GROVE CITY, PA)

SITE INVESTIGATION Validation and Interpretation of data

Geoprobe SDT45 Sonic Dual Tube Sampling System

Technical Bulletin No. MK3176. PREPARED: July, 2010

EXHIBIT G GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (DRAFT)

PILOT PROJECT «ILE DE FRANCE»

ZEBRA ENVIRONMENTAL MIP/EC ZEBRA ENVIRONMENTAL DIRECT SENSING SAMPLING INSTALLATION INJECTIONS

Subsurface Investigations PDCA Professor s Driven Pile Institute. Loren R. Anderson Utah State University June 25, 2015

SECTION SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION. 1. Protection of the environment; Section

June i TABLE OF CONTENTS

Determination of Design Infiltration Rates for the Sizing of Infiltration based Green Infrastructure Facilities

New Development -Sonic Drilling with Sampling

Design and Construction of Landfill Gas Monitoring Wells

HDD Training. Mitigation. Mark Miller, PE Jon Robison, PE

One Oxford Valley, Suite 200 Langhorne, PA Phone: (215)

Standard Practice for Thin-Walled Tube Geotechnical Sampling of Soils for Geotechnical Purposes 1

2. PLANNING AND MAKING A SOIL SURVEY

Westbay System. Multilevel Technology for Subsurface Characterization and Monitoring

Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering

A Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil & Soil investigation

Typical set up for Plate Load test assembly

Triad Case Studies from the Navy. Tim Shields and Adrianne Saboya U.S.Navy PWC Environmental Department San Diego, CA

Removal of Perchloroethylene within a Silt Confining Layer Using Hydrogen Release Compound

MiHpt Membrane Interface Probe + Hydraulic Profiling Tool

Exploration, Sampling, and In Situ Soil Measurements. Dr. Omar Al-Hattamleh

Stage 4 Geotechnical Investigations Information Sheet

Making Better Decisions: Real-Time Data Collection and Interpretation

Appendix VIII. Guidelines for groundwater bores and wells

The following sections provide the approved standard infiltration testing specifications.


GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT. FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK FOR PROPOSED 2 x 25 MVA 66/11kV G-1 SUB-STATION AT DWARKA, NEW DELHI.

Sepetember 27, Florida Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Dawn Templin 160 Governmental Center Pensacola, FL

Distribution Restriction Statement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

April 7, Webster Street Sub-Surface Stormwater Storage System Bid No Bid Date: 4/13/17 ADDENDUM NO 1

BS Geology, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas, May 1989

VERIFICATION OF GEOTECHNICAL GROUTING- STRATEGIES AND PLANNING. Michael J. Byle, D.GE, F. ASCE

MWH STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP-1 DRILLING METHODS

Environmental Management Chapter

Chlorinated DNAPL Identification using the Membrane Interface Probe (MIP)

GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE DATA REPORT

Monitoring Well Construction

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

The National Cooperative Soil Survey Program when complete. will have produced soil survey reports for all counties in the

SECTION XXXXX AGGREGATE PIERS PART 1 - GENERAL

Division Mandates. Supervise the drilling, operation, and maintenance of wells to prevent damage to life, health, property, and natural resources.

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

April 17, Dear Mr. Stella:

penetrometer test (CPT) soundings were done to supplement the SPT data. Construction recommendations were made for most of the new buildings.

Water for the World. Methods of Developing Sources

Overview Sonic Drilling Technology

Introduction to Horizontal Remediation Wells for Improved Site Cleanup Training Workshop

RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTAION OF DMG SPECIAL PUBLICATION 117 GUIDELINES FOR ANALYZING AND MITIGATING LIQUEFACTION IN CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ER U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CECW-CE Washington, DC Regulation No March 2006

REPORT OF LIMITED SUBSURFACE AND EXISTING PAVEMENT EVALUATION Melrose Street Reconstruction Winston-Salem, North Carolina S&ME Project No.

Implementation of Electrokinetic Based Soil Desalinization

April 21, Odom Investments, Inc. Attn: Mr. Jerry Odom 7100 Westwind Dr., Suite 230 El Paso, TX 79912

Grouting for Freezing

4.5 GEOTECHNICAL, SUBSURFACE, AND SEISMIC HAZARDS

Identification. Module 4 Water Well Drilling Agreements

Compaction and Jet Grouting

CONCENTRATE AND BRINE MANAGEMENT THROUGH DEEP WELL INJECTION. Abstract

1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION. 1.1 Site Location and Description. October 31, 2017

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I-15 SIGN BRIDGES LAS VEGAS EA JANUARY

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION: MATERIALS REPORT COVER SHEET. Revised Soil Survey Report November 24, 2015 Matthew G. Moore, P.E.

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION WEST MARJORY AVENUE TAMPA, FLORIDA

Figure (12.1) Foundation Grouting

mtec REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION FTFA Construct Bin Wall at HERD Eglin AFB, Florida

SECTION XXXXX STONE COLUMNS PART 1 - GENERAL

,.-,I. ?-.ET;,p\ L-,* :kg

P Temporary piezometer. MW Piezometer to remain in place. P Temporary piezometer

Interim Source Removal Summary Groundwater Extraction System Former American Beryllium Company Site Tallevast, Florida

1. All underground utilities under railroad tracks shall be encased in a larger pipe or conduit called the casing pipe.

APPENDIX A DRAINAGE STUDY PHASE 2 ALTERNATIVE IMPROVEMENTS CRYSTAL LAKE ALTERNATIVE 4C IMPROVEMENTS LAKEWOOD PIRATELAND SWASH HORRY COUNTY, SC

Multilevel Systems, Remediation & Drive-Points.

Practical Ways to Improve Remediation Well Performance

Subsurface Investigation and Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Volvo Dealership 1022 Hingham Street Rockland, Massachusetts

Design and Construction of Drilled Full Displacement Piles using the Penetration Resistance Method

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION BYFORGE ENGINEERING FOR REFERENCE ONLY

June 28, Test Well Flow Rate Report MSD Underground Injection Control Wells City of Richlawn Louisville, Kentucky 40207

Applied GeoScience, Inc Hammond Dr., Suite 6 Schaumburg, Illinois

November 13, IP3406. Mr. Uriah Sowell Rooney Engineering 115 Inverness Drive East, Suite 300, Englewood, CO 80112

RESPONSIBLE PLANNING FOR FUTURE GROUND WATER USE FROM THE GREAT FLATS AQUIFER : TWO CASE STUDIES: THE GEP ENERGY

Transcription:

Electrical Conductivity & Hydraulic Profiling The Combining of Two Subsurface Investigation Methods (With More to Come)

How has field work been progressing? Split Spoon and Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) Thin walled tube samples Soil Resistivity Testing Upgrades to SPT with the auto-hammer Cone Penetration Testing (CPT) Upgrades to CPT to include seismic testing Electrical Conductivity (soil resistivity going down-hole) Hydraulic Profiling Tool (HPT) Membrane Interface Probe (MIP)

What does EC provide? Electrical Conductivity (EC) measures the flow of electrical current through soil over a three inch interval. Based on the soil conductivity measurement, software estimates the soil type. Small particles with a larger surface to surface contact area transmit current better than larger particles that have less surface to surface contact.

The EC Probe The EC probe has four electrodes that send and measure electrical current. Measurement is similar to soil resistivity using the Wenner 4- probe system.

What Does Hydraulic Profiling Provide? HPT is used in conjunction with EC logging to assist in soil classification, identify permeable and impermeable zones in a soil profile, and determine groundwater depths.

EC & HPT Platforms EC & HPT are designed to work from direct push platforms The instrumentation is hydraulically pushed or advanced by hammering Logging depths are measured by attaching a string pot from the direct push unit to the advancing tool string.

Geoprobe 6620DT with EC/HPT

How does HPT work? The Hydraulic Profile Tool (HPT) measures the volume of flow and pressure required to inject water into the soil. Volume is used to determine the soil type Higher flow occurs in sand and gravel, or in loose materials Lower flow occurs in clays, or in dense materials Pressure is also used to determine soil and groundwater properties. Higher pressure can indicate clays or dense soil conditions Pressure that increases with increase depth can indicate depth below water Low pressure can indicate sand, gravel, or loose material

The HPT Probe The HPT portion of the probe has a screened discharge port to allow the water to be pumped into the soil formation. Both flow rate and pressure are measured. New models can also be reversed to collect water samples from an interval.

What can EC & HPT provide together? Using the EC & HPT data together we can better define: Soil types Location of the water table Soil density (relative measure) Estimated Soil permeability

Applications Water Well Siting Environmental Remedial Design Geotechnical Borrow Sources Directional Drilling

Some pros of EC & HPT Relatively simple to use Productivity 300 to 400 linear feet per day Low soil disturbance 1.5-inch diameter hole Produces no soil cuttings Data available on-site as the work progresses Direct push platform no tripping in and out of rods

Some cons of EC & HPT No physical soil samples are collected No direct soil strength data Use of the HPT can be limited in freezing conditions Exploration depth limited to the available electrical and fluid line Limited to soils that can be readily penetrated by hydraulic pressure and hammer action. Trouble shooting electrical problems may require some talent

Equipment for EC EC logging can be performed independently of HPT. EC requires the instrumented probe EC/HPT Rods typically 1.5 inch diameter The EC cable The Direct Imaging Unit A power source

The Probe The EC portion of the probe is near the base of the cone. It has four pins that produce or measure current. The HPT portion of the probe is located above the EC pins and provides a port for fluid to be introduced into the formation.

Setting up the equipment The equipment stack from top to bottom: EC/HPT Direct Image Unit (records the data) HPT Controller (controls pump pressure and flow rate) HPT Metering Pump (the pump unit)

The connections Water and electrical inputs on the back of the units. Everything is labeled and connections are made to fit only where they belong.

Setting Up The software walks you through the calibration and test set up

EC Calibration The electrical conductivity system is tested using a test conductivity block attached to the probe sensors. The EC software runs a self-test and will not allow data collection if anything is out of tolerance.

HPT Calibration The hydraulic profiling tool is calibrated by filling a test cylinder and measuring the pressure.

HPT Calibration Test Tough to see the pressure increasing as the calibration test cylinder fills.

EC & HPT Field Set Up

Trunk Line Length To provide ease of access when handling the rods the trunk line should be at least 25 feet and preferably 50 feet longer than the exploration depth.

Water Source The HPT flow rate is around 250 ml per minute (less than 0.07 gallons per minute) or about 4 gallons an hour. The two 5-gallon buckets provide the water source and a return.

HPT/EC Rod Carrier

Stringing the trunk line through the rods

Evaluating data on-site

Lessons Learned Where there is steam there is a problem. Encountering a hard strata that required extensive hammering heated the drive cap and melted the EC/HPT cable.

What it takes to run

The Problem Water bills are increasing, the available water is decreasing and the public wants answers.

Real Project Application Water Well Water well siting in Medicine Lodge, Kansas New municipal well location and depth is determined by locating the largest permeable zones with high flow capacity. A hydrogeologist analyzed the EC & HPT data to prepare crosssections of the area They located the largest sand seams using EC data, confirmed flow using HPT flow data and assessed the depth of water using HPT pressure data. From the data they sited the well and are preparing for a pump test.

What the client had available The client had a quarter section (160 acre) project site to investigate Subsurface data was limited to the Kansas Geologic Society on-line logs sporadic wells not consistently logged. A limited budget that must include: site investigation, test wells, pump testing, and production wells.

Using EC/HPT versus Auger Borings EC/HPT 14 locations varying from 60 to 80 feet in 2.5 days Continuous soil profile Continuous hydraulic flow data No spoil material to handle Client estimated cost savings of 60% Auger Boring with SPT 16 locations in 6 days Sampled at specific intervals No permeability data Problems with augers locking in the sand

Verifying the Conditions Based on the EC/HPT data, two auger borings were advanced at possible test well locations to verify the conditions. The EC/HPT corresponded very well with the auger samples.

Is it accurate? An EC/HPT log has been overlaid with the results of three split spoon samples taken at specific intervals. The results were remarkable.

What the final results look like

Installing the Test Well Once the subsurface conditions were verified with auger borings and split spoon sampling, a large diameter test well was installed.

Additional Data Based on the EC data, the clients hydrogeologist identified a possible issue with chlorides in the soil profile. An additional boring will be performed to collect water samples at specific intervals to determine if zones in the profile contain high chlorides.

Pump Testing Once the well was installed, a short term pump test was performed. The production was over 85 gallons per minute with a 24-inch draw down at the well. A long term well test will be performed this month.

An Environmental Project Use The project consisted of a spill that covered tens of acres and was believed to have migrated across a stream onto adjacent properties. The consultant needed to determine the lateral extent of the spill migration and needed to determine how deep the spill penetrated. Once the extent of the spill was determined, the consultant needed to design a remediation program.

What the Consultant Did The investigation program was on private properties with picky landowners Membrane interface probes were used on track mounted CPT rigs to determine the extent of the spill both laterally and in depth. Electrical conductivity logging was performed to depths of more than 125 feet to profile the soil and groundwater conditions. The consultant evaluated the soil, groundwater and spill data to determine a remedial plan.

The Plan The consultant remobilized to the site and used EC/HPT logging to define the soil types and permeability for a combination of injection and pump and treat remediation.

Remediation The consultant is working on a remediation plan and pilot test for the use of injection and/or pump and treat system.

Why did they use MIP, EC and HPT? The MIP provided the client with environmental data on-site in real time allowing them to adjust the testing locations. MIP, EC and HPT limited the disturbance to the properties and produced no soil cuttings. The schedule was expedited using these techniques over auger sampling that would require sending samples to an off-site laboratory for analysis.

Wrapping It Up the Pro s EC/HPT is a great tool for classifying soils and estimating permeability relatively quickly with little site disturbance. The combination of EC/HPT/MIP can provide consultants with data on the soil type, permeability and potential contamination in a single boring and in real time while on site saving time and money. In the right subsurface conditions investigation depths can exceed 125 feet. Its relatively easy to learn and use.

Wrapping It Up - the Limitations EC/HPT/MIP can only be used where advancement using hydraulic pressure and hydraulic hammering are possible. No physical samples are obtained using these methods. Separate borings are required to obtain samples. No strength data is obtained using these methods.

Wrapping it up Where are we going? In the last 10 years technology and the people using it have improved. Formerly considered Black Magic by engineers and geologists, technology like the CPT are becoming more readily accepted and used. The benefits of EC/HPT and MIP will become recognized and more readily accepted and used. Use of any of these technologies is dependent on competent field and office personnel. None of these can replace auger drilling, but will likely be used in conjunction with drilling.

Drillers Out Standing in Their Field