Ecological Integrity Monitoring Program

Similar documents
FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship

9/4/2013 CHAPTER 4 ECOLOGY AND GEOLOGY. Ecosystem. Ecology & Geology Linkage. Fundamental Ecology Terms. Natural Service Functions of Ecosystems

Draft Northwest Territories Conservation Areas Action Plan Frequently Asked Questions

RSVL (Network of Volunteer Lake Monitors)

CATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity.

Katahdin Forest Management 2016 SFI Summary Audit Report

Executive Summary: Report on Ecosystems Executive Summary: Report on Gatineau Park Ecosystems

Chapter Four: Overview. Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e. Case History: Endangered Trout. Ecology and Geology Linkage

Biodiversity and Global Change

INDICATOR MEASURE DATA SOURCES

Landscape planning contribution in ecosystem services concept implementation in Ukraine

FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship 1

Environment Canada Alberta Environment and Water March 2012

Ecological/Watershed Modeling. Cindy Ryals Taylor Carroll

BRIEF PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES, ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES BY THE KATIVIK REGIONAL GOVERNMENT

Private Woodland Owners - Meeting the Stewardship Challenge

Effects of offshore windfarms on marine wildlife a synthesis for Swedish waters

Katahdin Forest Management

Approaches for Incorporating Ecosystem Goods & Services in US Army Corps Planning and Benefits Evaluation*

Integration of climate change adaptation : site and landscape responses. Simon Duffield Natural England

Charter: Great Lakes Region Aquatic Habitat Connectivity Collaborative

Dang Thi Tuoi Biodiversity Conservation Agency (BCA) Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Vietnam (MONRE)

Flathead National Forest Assessment

STRATEGIC GUIDELINES FOR QUÉBEC PROTECTED AREAS. We Take Growth PERIOD

Ocean Energy Specialisation 2014 OER 1 and EPE 1&2 assignments

Habitat Coverage Targets for the Lower Columbia River - How Much is Enough?

St. Lawrence Action Plan Presentation to the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative. Québec City June 28, 2012

NATURE SCORE CARD. Funding & resources

Climate Change Adaptation for Natural Resources in the North Atlantic Region

Florida Forest Service 2018 Public Summary Audit Report

Community Benefits of Land Restoration

Testing the Global Surface Water Dataset for Canada

THE QUABBIN RESERVOIR Boston s Drinking Water Supply Area

How Much Habitat Is Enough? How Much Disturbance is Too Much?

THE FIRST IRAQI NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Belmont Forum Collaborative Research Action on Mountains as Sentinels of Change

NATIONAL ROAD MAP FOR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT May 17, 2004

2.4 Floodplain Restoration Principles

8/5/2011. Lesson Overview. Disturbance/Fragmentation. Shifting Mosaic. Number one cause of biodiversity loss. Types of disturbance. - Scale, frequency

Philmont Scout Ranch 2018 Public Summary Audit Report

Action Plan for West-Central Alberta Caribou Recovery

Operational Policy Statement

Status of the Ohio River Basin Fish Habitat Partnership

Measuring Ecological Integrity Across Jurisdictions and Scale

Sustainable Development Act

CCFM C&I REVIEW TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVED CCFM INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT

Where Funds are Spent

Development of a Statewide Wetland Reference Network for Montana. Karen Newlon and Linda Vance Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT

LCC Council Charter. Introduction

DEFINING SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN CANADA: CRITERIA AND INDICATORS Technical Supplement 2

IUCN Policy on Biodiversity Offsets

PUBLIC CONSULTATION FOLLOW- UP REPORT PAFIO AND MODIFICATIONS PAFIO

Year: IV Course Title: Biodiversity Conservation and Management Lecture hours: 150 Course Code: Env. 401

Ecosystems and Food Webs

Funding Guidelines State Fiscal Year 2016

Responsible Mining in the Lake Superior Basin Dec. 2013

Green Gold Label Program

Ecological restoration Efforts in Uganda by Tooro Botanical Gardens (TBG). Ruyonga Godfrey Miya Director Tooro Botanical Gardens

Public consultation as part of the Fitness Check of the EU nature legislation (Birds and Habitats Directives)

Linear Manmade Structures, Hydroscape Fragmentation, And Ecological Consequences

ALBERTA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION

Draft. Environmental Assessment Guidelines (including the Scope of the Environmental Assessment)

The U.S. Geological Survey s National Perspective on Restoration

WESTERN DIVISION POLICY

Dam removal on the Sélune River (France): Implementation of the ecological restoration project

Ecological Integrity in British Columbia s Parks and Protected Areas

DRAFT FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE APRIL 27, 2006 MEETING OF NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF THE HIGHLANDS COUNCIL

Performance Standard 6 V2

CWS Landscape Conservation Guidance and Planning. Graham Bryan CWS-ON September 16 th, 2016 Bracebridge

MARINE SYSTEMS Lecture Dan Cogalniceanu Course content Overview of marine systems

Forum on environmental flow needs in british columbia

Beverly. Produced in This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area.

Public consultation as part of the Fitness Check of the EU nature legislation (Birds and Habitats Directives)

Landscape Conservation Design in the Connecticut River Watershed: A Pilot Project

FOREST SERVICE MANUAL NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Adapting Project Descriptions for Climate Change

LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

IMO PREVENTION OF AIR POLLUTION FROM SHIPS. Consideration of adoption of three principles for market-based instruments

Ecosystem accounting at the European Environment Agency: a summary of progress 1

CLAREMONT CONSERVATION COMMISSION CONSERVATION PLAN Adopted 7/21/2016

The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity , the Aichi Biodiversity Targets and National Implementation. CBD Secretariat 3 to 10 October 2011

Patrick Center for Environmental Research

Standards and Assessment

Invasive Species Project Guidance

"Introduction to the Birds & Habitats Directives"

RESTORATION OF RARE PLANTS OF THE PALOUSE. Trish Heekin Conservation Planner Latah Soil and Water Conservation District

Decision Analysis Framing and Structuring for the Western Alaska Landscape Conservation Cooperative. Summary of Workshop held February 16-17, 2011

Frequently Asked Questions about the Cohesive Strategy and the. Northeast Regional Action Plan

Natural Resource Management of Pipeline Infrastructure

Climate Change Considerations in Land Management Plan Revisions January 20, 2010

Performance Standard 6

A multi-tiered monitoring approach to address management-driven research questions

Wilderness, Wildlife, and Ecological Values of the Hyalite-Porcupine-Buffalo Horn Wilderness Study Area Executive Summary

New Hampshire s Wildlife Habitat Conditions

ENVIRONMENT ACT TERMS OF REFERENCE NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS. Beaver Bank Bypass

Lake Britton Planning Unit. Fish, Plant, and Wildlife Habitat LAKE BRITTON PLANNING UNIT

Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Prioritizing Local Action. Strengthening the Resilience of the Taunton River Watershed

Ecosystem Management (EM) and Historical Range of Variability (HRV)

Katahdin Forest Management 2014 SFI Summary Audit Report

Transcription:

Ecological Integrity Monitoring Program Patrick Graillon Conservation coordinator

Quebec s National parks mission Park means a national park whose primary purpose is to ensure the conservation and permanent protection of areas representative of the natural regions of Quebec and of natural sites with outstanding features, in particular because of their biological diversity, while providing the public with access to those areas or sites for educational or cross-country recreation purposes. - Quebec Parks Act

Parc national de la Jacques-Cartier

Parc national de la Gaspésie

Parc national du Bic

Parc national du Mont-Mégantic

Parc national de l Île-Bonaventure-et-du-Rocher-Percé

Parcs Quebec A network of: - 24 national parks (11 080 km 2 ) - 1 marine park (1 246 km 2 ) - 10 parks in project (60 000 km 2 ) - 6 territories reserved for park creation (24 000 km 2 )

Delegated management Local native communities

What is the PSIE? A grouping of measures of ecological and human parameters (indicators) whose aim is to monitor the evolution of the ecological integrity level in Quebec s national parks south of the 50th parallel.

Objectives, principles and approaches Specific objectives of the PSIE - Evaluate conservation management efficiency. - Detect the beginning or existence of undesirable situations and, if possible, implement corrective actions. - Communicate information on parks health evolution to governmental authorities, partners, park users and the general public.

Objectives, principles and approaches A little history - Parks Canada brings to attention a EI problem in Canada s national parks (1997 State of the Parks report). - Preparation of the Parcs Quebec PSIE in 2001 and 2002. - Pilot projects in 2003 at Mont-Megantic and Mont-Saint-Bruno national parks.

Objectives, principles and approaches A little history - 2004 to 2009: Implementation of indicators to all parks managed by Sepaq. Evaluation and adjustment of the indicators. - 2009: Stage report and recommendation to improve the program.

Objectives, principles and approaches A little history - 2010: Program consolidation - Justification and improvement of indicators - Scientific committee feedback - Production of the official document - 2011: Public release of the official document. - 2013: First state of the parks report.

Objectives, principles and approaches Science - Credibility - Relevancy - Management - Cost efficiency - Feasibility -

Objectives, principles and approaches Choices

Objectives, principles and approaches Ecological integrity as a gradient ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ATTRIBUTES Degraded Intact (natural)

Objectives, principles and approaches Ecological integrity as a gradient ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ATTRIBUTES Degraded Intact (natural) High Human activities impact Low

Objectives, principles and approaches Ecological integrity as a gradient ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ATTRIBUTES Degraded Intact (natural) High Human activities impact Low Low Ecological integrity level High

Objectives, principles and approaches PSIE judges changes in the level of ecological integrity. To do so, measures are compared to a EI reference level which simply is the state measured at the beginning of the monitoring.

Objectives, principles and approaches In comparison, Parks Canada and the U.S. NPS evaluate EI on a quality basis which is based on ecologically acceptable thresholds.

Objectives, principles and approaches Why we chose to judge EI level changes instead of using a EI quality basis : - Theoretical aspect are much simpler since there s no quality thresholds to establish, which can be a complex and arguable exercise (What is normal or acceptable? How do humans fit in? How far back do we temporally go? How do we know what should be there? Etc.). - Measures are easy to implement since what we mostly need to know is on which side it is changing.

Objectives, principles and approaches Why we chose to judge EI level changes instead of using a EI quality basis : - The approach works for every park, whatever their initial EI state. Parcs Quebec network as very heterogeneous ecological conditions, so this point is particularly important. - Minimal development and operational cost, which is a major advantage to ensure it s perpetuity. The PSIE in operated within normal parks budget. It isn't dependant on external or random financial resources.

Objectives, principles and approaches The PSIE is not perfect The PSIE will always have room for improvement But managers respond positively to it It is logistically and financially feasible It is based on sound science And it exists!!

Indicators What we look for is a small number of indicators which together can reflect the quality of all parameters that composes parks ecosystems. Easier said than done

Indicators Indicator structure - Groups indicators by parameter to ensure that all aspects of ecosystems are covered. - Similar to the U.S. NPS structure.

Indicators Indicator structure

Indicators Indicator structure

Indicators Indicator structure

Indicators Indicator structure

Indicators Indicator structure

Indicators «Network» indicators - Basic indicators that must be followed by every park, if applicable.

Indicators «Network» indicators Ecosystemic component Parameter Indicator Methodology Air quality Precipitation acidity Atmospheric pollutants Rain ph MDDEP stations Air quality index (IQA) MDDEP stations

Indicators «Network» indicators Ecosystemic component Parameter Indicator Methodology Water quality Benthic fauna quality Lake acidity level Lake trophic level Bacterial and physicochemical stream water quality Normalized global biological index (IBGN) ph of selected lakes Lake voluntary surveillance network (RSVL) Bacterial and physicochemical water quality index (IQBP)

Indicators «Network» indicators Ecosystemic component Parameter Indicator Methodology Biological quality Non indigenous plant propagation Invasive exotic species Incidence of anthropogenic events on natural processes Importance of human and wildlife interactions Quadra sampling Species list Disturbance / restoration index Depredation index

Indicators «Network» indicators Parameter Indicator Methodology Biological quality Situation of selected fauna species Rare and endangered species situation Exceptional or fragile habitat quality Halieutic resources quality Periphery fauna habitat quality Monitoring of diverse indicator species or group of indicator species Monitoring of rare and endangered species or group of rare and endangered species Monitoring of exceptional or fragile habitats Fishing quality index (IQP) Moose hunting success index

Indicators «Network» indicators Human component Parameter Indicator Methodology Landscape spatial organisation Infrastructure density Fragmentation Periphery land use Leases and vested interests Infrastructure density index Landscape dissection index (LDI) Land use index Mission prejudice index

Indicators «Network» indicators Human component Parameter Indicator Methodology Infrastructure quality Hiking trail quality Campsite quality Water bank infrastructure quality Hiking trail width Degradation index Degradation index

Indicators One park, one program - All network indicators are not in use in all parks. - Final indicator choices is adjusted to each park specific reality. - Local indicators can be added. - Each park manages its own PSIE.

Communicating results Different audiences - Raw data and indices: For field managers and scientific community. - Synthetic results: General public, high administrators, politicians.

Communicating results Communication pyramid Scientific Adapted from the National Park Service (NPS)

Communicating results Scoring system - Allows to synthesise information for a vast public; - Does not replace raw data and specific analysis of indicators for field managers; - Based on a model developed by NatureServe for the Environnemental Protection Agency (EPA) in the U.S..

Communicating results Scoring system Change Color code Score Significant improvement + 2 Improvement + 1 Stable 0 Deterioration - 1 Significant deterioration - 2

Communicating results Five-year report - Every 5 years, a report on EI level changes will be produced for every park. - Number one is scheduled for 2013

www.parcsquebec.com/integriteecologique Detailed program accessible on Parcs Quebec web site (french only)