III. Corrections and Additions

Similar documents
APPENDIX H Summary of Changes in the Recirculated Draft EIR

V. MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN

South Coast Air Quality Management District Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA (909)

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE PLANNING AREA 6 NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Mitigation Monitoring Program

RESOLUTION NO:

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Final Environmental Impact Report BARTON PLACE

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE

Orange County Central Utility Facility Upgrade IP

Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Terminals 2 and 3 Modernization Project. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

ERRATA TO THE FINAL EIR

Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Terminals 2 and 3 Modernization Project. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

ATTACHMENT F FINAL SUBSEQUENT EIR REVISION LETTER AND ERRATA TO 12EIR (SCH # ) FOR THE TAJIGUAS RESOURCE RECOVERY PROJECT

Chapter 1. Introduction

RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE MT. SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE TRANSIT CENTER PROJECT

TT A PAGE 1 CONDITIONS UNIT MAP CONDITION

SUPPLEMENTAL CEQA ANALYSIS OF REDUCED DENSITY PROPOSAL

MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PLAN

Introduction. Chapter 3 Modifications to the Draft EIS/EIR

MMRP for Metro Red/Purple Line Core Capacity Improvements Project

Exhibit G. Construction Mitigation Plan

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 CEQA REQUIREMENTS 1.2 PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS

Orange County Water District Mid Basin Centennial Park Injection Well Project

DECEMBER2014. CityofSantaAna. RBFConsulting PREPAREDFOR: PREPAREDBY:

PREPARED TESTIMONY OF LEE LISECKI. Q. Please state your name, professional position, and business address.

Responses to Comments

8.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. May State Clearinghouse No Prepared for: Prepared by: Consulting Engineers and Scientists

MEETING HANDOUT. Meeting: Board Meeting. Date: July 5, 2017

DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Document considered draft until Board considers document

ADDENDUM TO THE CITY OF LAKEPORT GENERAL PLAN EIR

Section 2.0 Introduction and Purpose

I. INTRODUCTION. Third Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report for The Grand Avenue Project

Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the Los Angeles Street Civic Building Project

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF IMPORT EXPORT (EFFECTIVE 5/17/2010) REV: 7/18 GGI-08

KINGS COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

NEPA THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT CEQA THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

V. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

Boulder Ridge Fitness and Swim Center

Date: May 4, Clare M. Look-Jaeger, P.E. Kevin C. Jaeger Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Weingart Projects Construction Traffic Analysis

2. Introduction. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code Section et seq.)

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

APPENDIX A: NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND COMMENTS RECEIVED

1.0 INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE OF THE DRAFT EIR 1-1

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura ( County ), State of California, ordains as follows:

FINAL RECOMMENDATION OF THE DEVIL S GATE DAM SEDIMENT WORKING GROUP

State Clearinghouse Number Prepared for: City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Avenue Fontana, CA

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. July 14, 2015

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) Terminal 1.5 Project. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

RUNWAY 7L/25R RUNWAY SAFETY AREA (RSA) AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 2017 PROGRESS REPORT

SECTION 9.0 Effects Found Not To Be Significant

RESOLUTION NO

Carpinteria Valley Water District Carpinteria Advanced Purification Project

II. Corrections and Additions to the Draft EIR

Section 4.8 Climate Change

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO REVELLE COLLEGE APARTMENTS AND COMMONS DINING RENOVATION PROJECT

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT

RINCONADA WATER TREATMENT PLANT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report

III. CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR

City of Malibu. Whole Foods and the Park Shopping Center Draft Environmental Impact Report Volume I. Prepared For: Prepared by:

q,ied, L/01013 OcToDER 3 6, 2-0 I 3

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Headquarters Building and Site Rehabilitation Project

Preliminary Project Assessment

Environmental Impact Report

MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PLAN

3.0 ERRATA TO THE DRAFT EIR

Response to Comments of Rudy Swiridoff (Letter I14) The commentor s objection to the project is noted.

Menlo Park Planning Commission Draft EIR Public Hearing June 20, 2016

IV. Environmental Impact Analysis K.5 Utilities Natural Gas

Azusa Transit-Oriented Development Specific Plan. Final Environmental Impact Report SCH#

CONTINUING THE DISCUSSION ON-LINE

NOTICE OF PREPARATION. California Office of Planning and Research, Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, and Other Interested Parties

Addendum to Diablo Grande Specific Plan EIR and Water Resources Plan Supplemental EIR Diablo Grande Specific Plan, Phase I Page i.

4.16 Utilities and Service Systems

AUSTIN QUARRY PROJECT

SECTION 6.0 Alternatives to the Proposed Project

Purpose of the EIR. Chapter 1 Introduction

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

CNG Fueling Station. Fullerton Joint Union High School District. May 2016 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM. Prepared for:

FOR THE. State Clearinghouse Number: Prepared by:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS

RINCONADA WATER TREATMENT PLANT RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Second Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report

Mendocino Forest Products Grading For Industrial Land Improvements

PARKMERCED PROJECT EIR ERRATA

4.12 AIR QUALITY INTRODUCTION

MITIGATION MEASURES AND MONITORING. 5.1 Introduction

ROUTE 66 CORRIDOR SPECIFIC PLAN

Regional Connector Transit Corridor Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement/ Draft Environmental Impact Report

3 CONSTRUCTION-GENERATED CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT AND PRECURSOR EMISSIONS

Appendix A. Notice of Preparation and Comment Letters

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 BACKGROUND ES.2 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan

Attachment 1. Ordinance

Article 3. Density and Dimensional Standards

6.13 Utilities and Service Systems

V. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT

SUMMARY. Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Academic Building, Mission Bay Block 25A State Clearinghouse Number

Transcription:

A. Introduction The following corrections and additions are set forth to update the 100 W. Walnut Planned Development Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) in response to the comments received during the public review period. Changes to the Draft EIR are listed by section and page number and new text is provided in underline with strikeout of deleted text. These corrections and additions are in addition to any changes to the mitigation measures which are included in Section I, Introduction and Summary, and any changes to the Draft EIR that are set forth in Section II, Analysis of the Refined Project, of this Final EIR. The following additions and corrections have been reviewed in relation to the standards in Section 15088.5(a) and (b) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines on when recirculation of a Draft EIR is required prior to certification. The additions and corrections to the Draft EIR document do not constitute new significant information requiring recirculation of the Draft EIR. Sections 15088.5(a) and (b) of the State CEQA Guidelines state, (a) A lead agency is required to recirculate an EIR when significant new information is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of the draft EIR for public review under Section 15087 but before certification. As used in this section, the term information can include changes in the project or environmental setting as well as additional data or other information. New information added to an EIR is not significant unless the EIR is changed in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect (including a feasible project alternative) that the project s proponents have declined to implement. Significant new information requiring recirculation include, for example, a disclosure showing that: (1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented. Page III-1

(2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. (3) A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from other previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project, but the project s proponent decline to adopt it. (4) The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. (b) Recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR. B. Corrections and Additions Changes to the Draft EIR are identified below by the corresponding Draft EIR section and subsection, if applicable, and the page number. Additions are in underline and deletions are shown in strikethrough format. Summary The Summary of the Draft EIR is replaced by Section I, Introduction and Summary, of this Final EIR. IV.B.1 Transportation Section IV.B.1.5, page IV.B.1-55, replace Mitigation Measure B.1-6 with the Mitigation Measure B.1-6: The Project Applicant, or successor in interest, shall provide pedestrian lighting on both sides of the street along Holly Street from the Project Site to the Memorial Park Metro Gold Line Station (Arroyo Parkway) in accordance to the extent such lighting complies with the provisions of the Old Pasadena Streetscapes and Alley Walkways Plan and Elements. The location of this improvement is identified in Figure IV.B.1-20 on page V.B.1-82. Page III-2

Section IV.B.1.5, page IV.B.1-58, replace Mitigation Measure B.1-17 with the Mitigation Measure B.1-17: The Project Applicant, or its successor in interest, shall prepare a Construction Traffic Management Plan to the satisfaction of the City of Pasadena Department of Transportation at the time of final design. This Construction Traffic Management Plan shall include, at a minimum, the following key elements: Final haul routes, dust control, noise control and the methods demonstrating compliance with City regulations; Measures to be used to ensure that the construction activities and workers follow the provisions of the Project s Construction Traffic Management Plan; and Provide details of activities planned on-site at the time of final design, prior to commencement of construction;. Provide temporary traffic controls such as a flag person, during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow; Provide dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on-and off-site; and Reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas. IV.E.2 Cultural Resources Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Section IV.E.2.5, page IV.E.2-19, replace Mitigation Measure D.2-12 with the Mitigation Measure E.2-12: Within three months following completion of excavation, a final report of findings that summarizes the results of the work conducted under these mitigation measures shall be prepared by the Principal Archaeologist and the Principal Paleontologist and with regard to archaeological and paleontological resources respectively. These reports shall be submitted to the City of Pasadena. Page III-3

With regard to archaeological resources, the final report shall contain site forms, as needed, site significance, and mitigation measures. Any information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects shall be in a confidential addendum, and not made available for public disclosure pursuant to California Government Code Section 6254.10. A With regard to paleontological resources, a copy of the final report shall be filed at the museum repository. Submission of the reports as outlined above shall signify completion of the mitigation program. IV.F Air Quality Section IV.F.5, page IV.F-55-56, replace Mitigation Measure F-1 with the Mitigation Measure F-1: All off-road construction equipment, equal to or greater than 50 horsepower, that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours during any portion of Phase 1 or Phase 2 construction activities for the proposed Project shall meet Tier 3 standards where commercially available per SCAQMD. In addition, after January 1, 2015, all construction equipment subject to this mitigation measure shall meet Tier 4 standards, where available, and be outfitted with CARB-certified BACT devices, to the extent feasible and commercially available(e.g., void the manufacturer s engine warranty or create workplace conditions that are not consistent with OSHA requirements. The Project Applicant shall make available to the lead agency and the South Coast Air Quality Management District a comprehensive inventory of equipment subject to this mitigation measure. The inventory shall include the horsepower rating, engine production year, and certification of the specified Tier standard. A copy of each unit s certified tier specification, Best Available Control Technology documentation, and California Air Resources Board or Air Quality Management District operating permit shall be available onsite at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. Page III-4

The Project shall use as many haul trucks for soil export/ import that meet 2010 NO X emission levels as are commercially available. In the event that a sufficient number of haul trucks that meet 2010 NO X emission levels are not commercially available to meet the Project s requirements, then the Project shall use as many haul trucks for soil export/import that meet 2007 NO X emission levels as are commercially available. The Project Applicant shall make available to the City of Pasadena a comprehensive inventory of the haul trucks subject to this mitigation measure. Section IV.F.5, page IV.F-56, replace Mitigation Measure F-4 with the Mitigation Measure F-4: Architectural coatings for interiors shall meet super-compliant architectural coating requirements as identified by the SCAQMD (www.aqmd.gov.prdas/ brochures/super-compliant_aim.pdf), and where practical, the use of materials that do not require painting or the use of pre-painted construction materials shall be encouraged. Section IV.F.5, page IV.F-56, add Mitigation Measure F-5 as follows: Mitigation Measure F-5: Maximum daily soil disturbance during Phase 1 shall not exceed 6.66 acres of active grading area and 3,400 cubic yards of export of earth materials per day. Maximum daily soil disturbance during Phase 2 shall not exceed 5.6 acres of active grading area and 3,400 cubic yards of export of earth materials per day. IV.L.2 Utilities Sewer Section IV.L.2.2.b.(3), page IV.l.2-3, second paragraph, third and fourth sentences, are revised to read as follows: According to the Project s Engineering Analysis, the Whittier Narrows WRP has a design capacity of 15.0 million gallons per day and, as of 2010 (the most recent year for which data are available), it processed based on data from the County Sanitation Districts, currently processes an average flow of approximately 7.1 8.3 million gallons per day. The Los Coyotes WRP has a design capacity of 37.5 million gallons per day and, as of 2010 (the most recent year for which data are available), it processed based on data Page III-5

from the County Sanitation Districts, currently processes an average flow of approximately 26.8 21.7 million gallons per day. Page III-6