STURGIS Barge Decommissioning Project

Similar documents
Sturgis MH-1A Decommissioning Project Summary

TIMELINE/SCHEDULE. * Pertains to Original Schedule. US Army Corps of Engineers

CHARACTERIZATION OF THE NUCLEAR BARGE STURGIS

WELCOME SM-1 DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT

Remediation and Decommissioning Technology

Waste Management for Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants An EPRI Decommissioning Project Report

Experiences on a Regulatory Clearance of the Radioactive Wastes at KAERI

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities. The Decommissioning Process. Lesson Objectives. Decommissioning. Decontamination. Decommissioning Objective

Lessons Learned from Shut-Down to Decommissioning Plan at the Army Pulse Radiation Facility

Upcoming Decommissioning Activities at the Buffalo Materials Research Center. Dave Vasbinder B.M.R.C. Director

DEACTIVATED NUCLEAR. Brenda Barber, P.E. Hans Honerlah, CHMM Baltimore District, CENAB-ENE. March 2018

So Now You Are The RSO Radiation Safety Programs. Norman W. Henry III, MS,CIH SHBP (Safety and Health By Protection) comcast.

DECOMMISSIONING STRATEGIES AND PLANS. By: Elna Fourie Necsa South Africa Manager: Decommissioning Services

ADVANCED DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING SYSTEM

Spent Nuclear Fuel, Low Level Radioactive Waste and Decommissioning

China, Philippines, Serbia, Brazil

San Onofre Unit 1 Decommissioning

Update on Atomic Energy of Canada Limited

ANSTO s POLICY for MOATA & HIFAR. Prepared by John Rowling November 2007

Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities. Waste Management

CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY

Linde FUSRAP Site Tonawanda, New York

NATIONAL PROGRESS REPORT INDONESIA

Applicability of EPRI Decommissioning Pre-Planning Manual to International Decommissioning Projects

Pham Hoai Phuong and Pham Van Lam NUCLEAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE, VAEC

DRAFT IMPLEMENTING DECREE. of 2016

Comparison of decommissioning options for the example of 2 research reactors of type TRIGA

Eric W. Abelquist, Ph.D., CHP President, Health Physics Society. August 2017

Overview of Philippine Nuclear Regulations. Eulinia M. Valdezco Nuclear Regulations, Licensing and Safeguards Division

Niagara Falls Storage Site Safety Measures During Remediation

RECYCLING OF URANIUM- AND PLUTONIUM-CONTAMINATED METALS FROM DECOMMISSIONING OF THE HANAU FUEL FABRICATION PLANT

Safety Culture Assessment for Design Organizations

Niagara Falls Storage Site

IAEA-TECDOC-272 IAEA PROVISIONAL CODE OF PRACTICE ON

Safety Requirements for Decommissioning of Research Reactors

APPLIED SYNERGY IN WASTE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES FOR DECOMMISSIONING AT THE LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY

November 16, 2012 SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT / , / , /

Radiation Safety Committee Control Functions and Administrative Procedures

Review of Radiological Conditions at Six Vicinity Properties (VPs) and Two Drainage Ditches at the Niagara Falls Storage Site (NFSS), New York

Annual Forum of the International Decommissioning Network (IDN) Vienna, Austria 5-7 December 2017

21 November 1995 No.170-FZ RUSSIAN FEDERATION FEDERAL LAW ON ATOMIC ENERGY USE

Future Challenges in Decommissioning of NPPs Worldwide

THE AMERICAN REINVESTMENT AND RECOVERY ACT: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP OPERATIONS

Nuclear Waste Management Forum

PRR-1 Decommissioning: Preparing for Dismantling and Decontamination. R2D2 Project Meeting, Manila, Philippines September

WM'07 Conference, February 25 - March 1, 2007 Tucson, AZ

Excellence in Control of Radiation Exposures

EPRI Research and Development Projects for NPP Decommissioning

New Swedish Regulations for Clearance of Materials, Rooms, Buildings and Land Efraimsson, Henrik Swedish Radiation Safety Authority, SWEDEN

Maria Taranger Foto: Kävlinge Municipality

FACILITY WASTE CHARACTERIZATION FOR D&D HEU, MIXED AND LLRW FOR CERCLA, RCRA, DOE AND NRC COMPLIANCE

CONDITIONING OF OPERATIONAL AND DECOMMISSIONING WASTES AT THE KARLSRUHE RESEARCH CENTER

Radiological Characterisation Know Your Objective. Veronica Lindow and Jennifer Möller Vattenfall Research & Development

US Ecology Update & Case Studies. Chad Hyslop Director of Sales & Marketing (208)

RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Safety Considerations in the Transition from Operation to Decommissioning of Research Reactors

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS for protecting people and the environment. Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste from Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities

RADIOACTIVE GRAPHITE MANAGEMENT AT UK MAGNOX NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS. G. HOLT British Nuclear Fuels plc, Berkeley, United Kingdom 1.

Joint ICTP-IAEA School on Nuclear Energy Management. 15 July - 3 August, Lecture Notes. I. Mele IAEA, Vienna, Austria

Regulatory Requirements for Site Approval Permit of Nuclear Power Plants

LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM, INC.

Zion Project Overview S. Chris Baker VP EH&S

Questions Q1. * A resistor is a circuit component.

Two Approaches to Reactor Decommissioning: 10 CFR Part 50 License Termination and License Amendment, Lessons Learned from the Regulatory Perspective

Activities of the Midwest Interstate Low Level Radioactive Waste Compact Commission Biennial Report

-LESSONS LEARNED- GENERAL ATOMICS HOT CELL FACILITY DECONTAMINATION & DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT R. CUMMINGS J. DAVIS USDOE G. BRAMBLETT GENERAL ATOMICS

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT PROPOSED CALENDAR YEAR 2017 STANDARD PERMIT APPLICATION TURNAROUND TIMES

Methodology to Manage Material and Waste from Nuclear Decommissioning. Waste Management & Decommissioning Working Group

APPENDIX A OVERVIEW OF THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS

Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Update

International Shipbreaking Limited. Providing the Solution to an Environmental Threat

Analysis of Blending of Low-Level Radioactive Waste

// SAFE AND INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR THE TRANSPORT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS

S z5a MPC&D July 31, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C

IAEA CLASSIFICATION OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE

2 / 1. SUMMARY public, should be well documented, and should be reviewed on a regular basis to determine whether it continues to meet the operational

Standard Operating Procedure. RA01 Radiation Dose Assessment for Cases Requiring Detailed Analysis

Benefits from R&D for D&D Projects 15089

WM2014 Conference, March 2 6, 2014, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Overview and Activities of MEXT

2014 Decommissioning Cost Analysis of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 & 3

Ageing Management and Development of a Programme for Long Term Operation of Nuclear Power Plants

Presented By Quarterly Public Meeting August 22, 2012

Alec Kimber Australian Nuclear Science & Technology Organisation

Radioactive Waste Management at the NCSR Demokritos - Greece

AECL and Radioactive Waste Management

Nuclear Physics. Expertise in nuclear calculations, safety, radiation protection, fluid and structural dynamics simulations

Radiological Surveys Performed in Support of the Demolition and Bulk Disposal Decommissioning Method

Surprises & Challenges with Low Level Radioactive Materials. Presented by Mike Allsobrook (VertaseFLI)

MINIMIZATION AND SEGREGATION OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES IAEA, VIENNA, 1992 IAEA-TECDOC-652 ISSN

Decommissioning Worldwide and NEA Activities

Stage 3. DETERMINING THE POSSIBILITIES OF DECOMMISSIONING THE REACTOR COMPARTMENTS

University of Maryland Baltimore. Radiation Safety Procedure

MEDICAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN SAUDI ARABIA

Power Reactor Decommissioning: U.S. Perspective on Regulatory Insights and Challenges

Transportation of Radioactive Materials in Ontario Information Package

Nuclear Aircraft Carrier Inactivation Approach for Waste Management and Exposure Reduction 14201

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE FREE RELEASE CRITERIA FOR DECOMMISSIONING PROJECTS. Jas Devgun Sargent & Lundy 55 E. Monroe St.

President-Elect. Regis A. Greenwood, C H P Inletridge Drive Maryland Heights, MO

WM 2010 Conference, March 7-11, 2010 Phoenix, AZ

Transcription:

STURGIS Barge Decommissioning Project U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nov. 17, 2014 US Army Corps of Engineers

Today s Presentation History of the STURGIS Environmental Assessment Decommissioning Waste Segregation Safety Measures Oversight Milestones Economic Impact Questions 2

First Barge Mounted Nuclear Power Plant The former World War II Liberty Ship, SS Charles H. Cugle, was converted into a nuclear power plant in 1966. STURGIS was the first barge mounted nuclear plant to regularly supply power to a shore station. The STURGIS nuclear reactor, MH-1A, was used to generate electricity for military and civilian use in the Panama Canal from 1968-1976. 3

The STURGIS is a Historic Property Design schematic from 1959 The STURGIS is considered a historic property eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. During decommissioning, the Corps will preserve items of historic interest, including an electronic repository of documents 4

Fuel Removal and Long-term Storage In 1977, the STURGIS returned to Fort Belvoir where the nuclear fuel was removed, and the vessel was prepared for safe long-term storage. The STURGIS has been maintained in James River Reserve Fleet at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, VA since 1978. The Corps of Engineers has performed quarterly monitoring and periodic maintenance for the past 36 years. 5

Characterization Confirms Very Low Radiation Levels The vessel s radiological and chemical contaminants were evaluated in 2001. The extensive characterization confirmed that radiation levels have decayed to safe working levels. 6

Characterization 7

Basic Types of Ionizing Radiation 4 2 α+ + Alpha Paper Plastic Lead Concrete 0-1 β - Beta 0 0 γ Gamma and X-rays 1 0 n Neutron 8

Where Did the Radioactivity Come From? Radiation is emitted Neutron is emitted Materials become radioactive (e.g. Ni-63 & Co-60) Neutron source Materials become stable Co-60 > Ni-60 Ni-63 > Cu-63 9

STURGIS Primary Radionuclides Primary radionuclides are activation products Co-60 Ni-63 Most of the activity is in the form of radioactive metal in the reactor pressure vessel and the primary shield tank Ni-63 emits low-energy beta radiation Co-60 emits beta and gamma radiation 10

Characteristics of the Important Radionuclides Radionuclide Abbreviation Half-life (years) Radiation Emitted % Abundance 12/14 Cobalt-60 Co-60 5.27 Beta/gamma 27.05 % Nickel-63 Ni-63 100.1 Low-energy beta 72.46% 11

The Half-Life of a Radionuclide 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of half-lives Half life is the time it takes for 1/2 of the atoms to decay. The half-life of Co-60 is 5.27 yrs. The half-life of Ni-63 is 100.1 yrs. 12

Radioactive Decay Since Shutdown 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 Co-60 gamma emitting isotope Ni-63 low energy beta emitting isotope 13

Environmental Assessment 14

Four Coastal Cities Were Selected for the Assessment Galveston, TX Hampton Roads, VA Baltimore, MD, and Charleston, SC 15

Site Selection Was Based On: Proximity to the Corps of Engineers offices Proximity to waste disposal facilities, and Availability of shipyards and ship breaking operations. 16

An Environmental Assessment was Conducted in 2013 The purpose of an environmental assessment is to determine the potential environmental impacts associated with each selected site. 17

The Environmental Assessment Considered: Ecology, including marine mammals, essential fish habitat, benthic communities and protected species Cultural resources, including preservation of historical documents Water, including bays, estuaries and wetlands Air quality, including towing and decommissioning activities Waste management, including hazardous and radioactive waste 18

The Bottom Line: There are no significant impacts The environmental assessment concluded there are no significant environmental impacts, including impacts related to transportation. 19

Decommissioning 20

Primary Objectives Decommission, then dismantle the vessel. Remove radioactive material to permit the STURGIS to be released for unrestricted use. Segregate waste streams. Ensure wastes are disposed in licensed facilities. Recycle nonradioactive material. Terminate the Army Reactor Office permit. 21

Path Forward Inspect STURGIS prior to relocation. Conduct baseline radiological survey at Malin Shipyard prior to towing. Prepare STURGIS for towing to Malin Shipyard. Remove STURGIS' residual radiological and hazardous materials. 22

Path Forward All parts and contents of STURGIS and the MH- 1A reactor will be disposed as Clean (recycled/land filled) [Estimated ~90%] The shipbreaking is planned to be completed in Brownsville, TX Radioactive [Estimated ~8%] Hazardous [Estimated ~2%] Mixed waste (Radioactive and hazardous/ asbestos/universal) [Estimated <1%] 23

Towing Route 24

TAMU-Galveston Malin Shipyard 25

26

Risk Reduction and Safety The potential risks from radiation sources may result from Internal exposures, or External exposures Different control methods are used depending on the type of exposure 27

Internal and External Exposure Radiation Source External Exposure Internal Exposure 28

Risk Reduction and Safety External radiation protection - Establishing a security perimeter to control access - Using shielding on components that have higher exposure rates - Minimizing the time any of the higher exposure rate components are not shielded - Using 3-D laser mapping to facilitate planning Internal radiation protection - Conduct activities in a contained area of the barge using proven industry standards - Use contamination control methods such as glove bags, foaming, and fixatives - Control air flow and emissions using HEPA filtration units 29

Hurricane Plan A detailed hurricane plan will be prepared: Double tie the STURGIS in place and make sure it is water tight. STURGIS will be left in the shipyard to ride out the storm. Consistent with what Malin Shipyard has done before during previous hurricanes. 30

Project Team and Schedule 31

Contract Award March 2014, award of $34.6M to CB&I to complete the STURGIS decommissioning in Galveston Award was based on best value considering technical approach, management, past performance, and cost factors. 32

Project Team Members of the project and oversight team include: Professional Engineers Certified Health Physicists (Radiation Safety) Environmental Scientists Regulatory Specialists Safety Specialists Qualified Technicians 33

Highly Skilled and Experienced Contractor Team 34

Federal Oversight U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will provide quality assurance over the contractor and their quality control program Corps of Engineers National Environmental Center of Expertise Army Reactor Office and Reactor Council Oak Ridge Associated Universities Independent Review 35

State Oversight Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Disposal of Low level Radioactive Waste Remediation of Asbestos Containing Materials Texas Department of State Health Services Release of materials Materials in transport Licensing Asbestos workers 36

STURGIS Schedule Tow STURGIS in 2015 Begin decommissioning in 2015 Decommissioning will take 12-14 months 37

Economic Impact 38

Economic Impact Employment: EnergySolutions and Malin will require 45 people for the job EnergySolutions will hire four to six radiation technicians Malin Shipyard will hire ten employees: laborers, security officers, riggers, electricians and mechanics EnergySolutions will use union Longshoremen at transload facility for waste shipment The current estimate of direct economic impact for the City of Galveston is $17,500,000. 39

QUESTIONS? 40