Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridors August 2016

Similar documents
Re: Docket No. DOT-OST , Establishment of Interim National Multimodal Freight Network

Virginia Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridor Designation WebEx Discussion. September 28, 2017, 10:30 12:00

Draft for Public Review

Multimodal Freight Transportation Policy Overview

BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

AAPA Executive Management Conference May 4, 2017 Rickey Fitzgerald, FDOT Freight & Multimodal Operations Office Manager

Minnesota s Statewide Freight System Plan and Freight Investment Plan

Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO

Status of Freight Planning in the Alamo Area MPO

Freight Investment Plan Update

Northeast Clean Freight Corridors Workgroup #5 Designating Alternative Fuel Corridors

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

CRITICAL RURAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS SWRPC Transportation Advisory Committee May 7, 2018

MULTIMODAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Freight Investment Plan Update

FREIGHT PLAN UPDATE/CRITICAL FREIGHT CORRIDORS. Association of Texas MPOs 2017 Summer Meeting

P.L Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

congestion management process

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN. Greater Houston Freight Committee Kick-Off Meeting

NC State Freight Plan

Delaware Valley Freight Planning

AGENDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Tuesday, July 18, :30 a.m Broadway Independence Pass Board Room

Overview of the Draft Highway Primary Freight Network. November 20, :00 2:30 pm ET Coral Torres Ed Strocko

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. AAMPO Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)

Business Item Transportation Committee Item

2018 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

Chapter 9: Vision Plan. Chapter 9. Vision Plan. Lake Loveland. Image 179 Credit: City of Loveland

KICK-OFF MEETING April 2, 2014 Topeka, Kansas

Transportation Committee

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: PRIORITIZING FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS

Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2. October 21, 2015

Corridors of Statewide Significance: Introduction

LOUISIANA FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN Donald Vary. March 1, 2016

Crystal Jones. Office of Freight Management and Operations. USDOT Federal Highway Administration

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional Classification System. Briefing to MPOs, PDCs, and Local Governments

Treasure Coast Regional Long Range Transportation Plan - Freight Element

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan. Minnesota Department of Transportation

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN UPDATE. Regional Freight Advisory Committee NCTCOG

Freight Provisions in the FAST ACT

MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

2016 Arizona Pavement/Materials Conference. Dennis Smith MAG Executive Director (602)

TH 13 Port of Savage Truck Access Study

Connectivity North and Beyond Nevada s I 80 Corridor

FAST Act House and Senate Freight Provisions

SIS Policy & Implementation

INDIANA S INTERMODAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Stephen C. Smith Planning Manager, Transportation Planning Division Indiana Department of Transportation

GREATER CHARLOTTE REGIONAL FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN

Are We Prepared for the Energy Movements? JEANNIE BECKETT THE BECKETT GROUP ENERGY EXPORT PERMITTING IN THE NW JUNE SEA-TAC CONFERENCE CENTER

FHWA Freight Performance Measures New York Workshop. Freight Performance Measures Program Background

TRANS-TEXAS CORRIDOR-35 CURRENT ISSUES

ACTION TRANSMITTAL

Updating Virginia s Statewide Functional. Brad Shelton, VDOT Chris Detmer, VDOT Ben Mannell, VDOT

New Approaches to Public Collaboration

IDENTIFYING INDIANA'S PORTION OF THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM

TRANS-TEXAS CORRIDOR-35 REGIONAL/STATE UPDATE

CHAPTER 5: TRANSPORTATION

State of Idaho Profile

PLANES, TRAINS & SEMIS South Carolina s Statewide Freight Plan

Federal-aid 101 A Financial Overview. Mark Newland FHWA, Financial Manager Purdue Road School, 2014

Trans-Texas Corridor-35 Update

Minnesota State Freight Investment Plan. For State Fiscal Years

Table 2: Recommended Improvement Projects - Northeast Area Transit Evaluation. Plan

2017 Freight System Plan

NEW YORK TRANSPORTATION FACTS ECONOMIC IMPACTS

Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee January 8, NCDOT Rail Division. Paul Worley, NCDOT Rail Division Director

Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

AASHTO Summary and Analysis of the Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy (DRIVE) Act August 28, 2015

PROLOGIS GEORGETOWN CROSSROADS

Prologis Georgetown Crossroads

AAPA Comment: FHWA s Primary Freight Network Should Include Connectors to All Trade Gateways and Freight Corridors

GNC Coalition Update. Washington Public Ports Association Trade and Transportation Committee November 18, 2015

Freight Profile Bismarck-Mandan MPO Regional Freight Plan FINAL

Chapter 6 Freight Plan


Moving Washington Forward: State and Ports working together for freight mobility in reauthorization

Mobility 2025 Update: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan

Final Recommendations Identification of Improvements, Strategies, and Solutions

Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance

SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN

Multimodal National Freight Policy Freight Corridors

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

PA Freight Discussion Transportation Engineering & Safety Conference December 6, Brian D. Hare, P.E. PennDOT Program Center

What is the Transportation Policy Plan (TPP)?

TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN 2017

I-70 East Webinar for Subcontractors. April 14, 2015

Freight Trends and Freight Rail

Chapter 3 Missouri Freight System

CHANGE IN THE FREIGHT MARKET: TRENDS, DISRUPTORS & FAST ACT

FREIGHT CORRIDORS AND GATEWAYS: DEVELOPMENT APPROACH AND EVALUATION CRITERIA COMPARISON IN NORTH AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

Regional Freight Corridors in the Southeast. Bruce Lambert Executive Director, ITTS

STATEWIDE ANALYSIS MODEL (SAM-V3) June 5, 2014 Janie Temple

Published by the Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) in coordination with Leftwich Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Task 3. Rural Priority Corridors. Technical Memorandum. prepared for SJVCOG. prepared by. Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

11. PHASED IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

Interstate and Strategic Corridor Plans. January 9, :30 AM

MARTINSVILLE SOUTHERN CONNECTOR STUDY CITIZEN INFORMATION MEETING Magna Vista High School 701 Magna Vista School Road Ridgeway, Virginia May 8,

All Roads Do Not End at the State Line: Methodologies for Enabling Geodata Sharing Across Boundaries

Peninsula Widening. Project Description. Overview of Project Status. Estimated Total Project Cost $4.7 - $7.3 Billion

Transcription:

Critical Rural and Urban Freight Corridors August 2016 1

National Highway Freight Network (NHFN) Established by FAST Act to strategically direct resources and policies toward improved performance of highway portions of the U.S. freight transportation system. Includes the following subsystems: Primary Highway Freight System (PHFS) Identified by FHWA as most critical highway portions of U.S. freight transportation system Other Interstate Portions not on the PHFS Critical Freight Corridors Public roads which provide access and connection to the PHFS and the Interstate with other important ports, public transportation facilities, or intermodal freight facilities. Critical Rural Freight Corridors (CRFCs) Not in an urbanized area > 50,000 Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFCs) In an urbanized area > 50,000 A project must be on the NHFN in order to be eligible for funding under the new formula freight program the National Highway Freight Program (NHFP). 2

3

Primary Highway Freight System (PHFS) Route No Start Point End Point Miles I 225 I 25 I 70 12.13 I 25 NM/CO Line CO/WY Line 299 I 270 I 76 I 70 4.95 I 70 UT/CO Li ne CO/KS Li ne 451.46 I 76 I 70 CO/NE Line 12.38 SH 2 CO12R I 70 0.28 E 470 CO22A I 70 7.33 US 6 CO11L I 270 0.33 US 85 TOTAL I25 2.08 Miles South of I 25 Non PHFS Interstate Route No Start Point End Point Miles 2.08 789.94 I 270 I 25 I 76 1.08 I 76 US 85 CO/NE Li ne 171.59 TOTAL 172.67 Colorado National Highway Freight Network Total: 1,217.17 miles PHFS: 789.94 PHFS Intermodal Connectors: 13.52 Non PHFS Interstates: 172.67 CRFC: 160.69 CUFC: 80.35 PHFS Intermodal Connectors Facility ID Facility Name Facility Description Miles CO10R CO11L CO12R CO22A CO6R CO7R CO8L CO9R TOTAL Burlington Northern RR Transfer Facility Conoco Pipeline Transfer Union Pacific RR Transfer Facility Denver International Airport Union Pacific RR Auto Transfer Burlington Northern RR Auto Transfer Kaneb Pipeline Transfer Southern Pacific RR Transfer Facility 53rd Pl. to Broadway to 58th Ave (S.H. 53) to I 25 From U.S. 6: W 0.8 mi on 56th Avenue to Terminal Entrance at Brighton Blvd (S.H. 265) From S.H. 2 (Colorado Blvd): W 1.4 mi on 40th Ave to terminal entrance at Williams Street Pena Blvd (E 470 interchange E 0.7mi) From I 76: E 0.1 mi on 96th Ave, N 1.0 mi on I 76 Frontage Road to Terminal Entrance From I 76: E 1.7 mi on 88th Ave, N 0.2 mi on Yosemite Ave to terminal entrance From I 76: E 0.1 mi on 88th Ave, S 1.2 mi on Brighton Rd, E 0.3 mi on 80th St to entr at Krameria St. From I 76: South on Pecos Street to Terminal Entrance at 56th Avenue 0.98 0.83 1.45 5.1 0.48 1.66 1.91 1.09 13.52 4

Critical Freight Corridors Critical Rural Freight Corridors (CRFC) 160.69 miles, designated by the State Outside of Adjusted Urbanized Area Boundaries > 50,000 Must meet one of several criteria Can be updated as priorities change, projects are completed, etc. Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFC) 80.35 miles, designated by the State in consultation with MPO, or designated by the MPO in consultation with the State (for MPOs > 500,000) Inside Adjusted Urbanized Area Boundaries > 50,000 Must meet one of several criteria States and MPOs determine how to distribute mileage Can be updated as priorities change, projects are completed, etc. 5

Critical Freight Corridors Identify corridors based on areas of greatest freight need/priority Use Colorado Freight Corridors identified in the State Highway Freight Plan as starting point Starting point, not limited to Less comprehensive of freight needs in metro areas Identify smaller corridor segments rather than entire corridors Review and solicit input on potential corridor segments from TPRs, MPOs, STAC, and FAC Align with project selection for National Highway Freight Program Submit initial designations to FHWA Conduct further analysis as part of Multimodal Freight Plan development Update annually 6

National Highway Freight Program Provides formula funds to the States to improve the efficient movement of freight on the National Highway Freight Network (NHFN) Approximately $15 million to Colorado annually, beginning in FY 16 Project must be on the NHFN, or be a freight intermodal or freight rail project Wide range of eligible activities Project selection for FY 16 17 planned this fall, in alignment with corridor identification Long term approach to the NHFP, including vision/goals for freight investment, identification of needs, criteria, project selection process, and priorities to be developed as part of Multimodal Freight Plan in 2016 2017. 7

8

9

10

11

Additional Resources National Highway Freight Network http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/infrastructure/nfn/index.htm Critical Corridors Guidance http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/crfc/sec_1116_gdnce.htm National Highway Freight Program http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/pol_plng_finance/policy/fastact/ s1116nhfpguidance/ CDOT Multimodal Planning Branch Freight Planning https://www.codot.gov/programs/planning/planning programs/freightprogram State Highway Freight Plan http://coloradotransportationmatters.com/other cdot plans/freight/ 12